Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Marcelo
supposed to be the first ever inmate to be executed instead of Leo Echegaray. But at the last
minute, Galera was saved and charged innocent. What if the declaration was 5 minutes late? The
execution was irreversible, and Galera could have been dead by then. There is also the incident
of Carlos Gorbilla, a corn vendor who was sentenced to death only minutes after being accused
of rape, even without enough evidences. Was he guilty or innocent? The court never found out,
but he was executed instantly. This just proves that death penalty is really anti-poor because of
the unjust trials and giving out of death sentences to innocent or wrongly accused people who
cannot afford to pay good lawyers to defend them. Death penalty robbed the criminals a chance
to fight for their freedom.
Thirdly, death penalty beats its purpose of eliminating or decreasing the crime rate in the
Philippines. According to newspaper clippings and web articles that we read, the crime rate in
the Philippines during the implementation of the death penalty steadily rose instead of
decreasing. This shows that the harsh punishment implemented was not effective. Instead of
spreading fear to all crime makers, it seems that it has only raised a thrilling and inviting
challenge for them. It also destroyed its purpose of maintaining peace and order. Instead, it has
raised arguments and issues raised by pro-life groups, religious organizations and the families of
criminals begging for justice. The implementation of death penalty served justice to only a
handful of individuals, but for the others, it has only raised hatred and vengeance.
Lastly, death penalty shows the ineffectiveness of the Philippine government. The
implementation of the death penalty law shows the government is incapable of making the
citizens follow the law. As stated earlier, crime rates continued to increase with the
implementation of death penalty. If the law handed out by the government is ineffective, then
what is the sense of re-imposing it today when clearly, no major change on the constitution has
happened? As political science major Vertine Beler puts it, Whether death penalty is reimposed or not, criminals will continue to commit crimes with little fear or restraint, as long as
the police is inept and the justice system is so frustratingly slow.
To sum it all up, we are against the re-implementation of the death penalty law because
of four reasons. Death penalty robs the criminals a right to live, a right to defend themselves and
a right to build a new life. It also damages our morals as Filipinos and as Catholics, making us
hug a culture of blood and death. More importantly, death penalty defeats its purpose of
eliminating crimes and as showed by the trial and error period during the reign of Pres. Marcos
to Pres. Arroyo, death penalty did nothing to improve the quality of justice we have in the
Philippines. We believe that more than 10 years of experimenting with the law is enough
death penalty is clearly not the answer to the countrys crime problems.
"An execution is not simply death. It is just as different from the privation of life as a
concentration camp is from prison. It adds to death a rule, a public premeditation known to the
future victim, an organization which is itself a source of moral sufferings more terrible than
death. Capital punishment is the most premeditated of murders, to which no criminal's deed,
however calculated can be compared. For there to be an equivalency, the death penalty would
have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a
horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for
months. Such a monster is not encountered in private life."
Albert Camus---"Reflections on the Guillotine, Resistance, Rebellion & Death" (1956).
RESOURCES:
A. Clippings:
a. Roses and Thorns Article by Alejandro Recos
b. Kultura ng Pagpaslang by Reuel Aguila
c. Are Filipinos really this bloodthirsty by Neal H. Cruz
d. Pope condemns death penalty
e. Ipaglaban Mo Article by Atty. Sison
B. Book:
a. When the State Kills: The Death Penalty vs. Human Rights by the Amnesty
International
C. Websites:
a. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_debate
b. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_Philippines
c. http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno7659.htm
d. http://wiki.lawcenter.ph/index.php?title=Death_penalty
e. http://pcij.org/blog/2006/04/18/a-timeline-of-death-penalty-in-thephilippines
f. http://www.helium.com/items/68046-death-penalty-in-the-philippines
g. http://the-diplomat.com/asean-beat/2011/01/24/philippines-death-penaltyback/
h. http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20110119i.
315382/Aquino-against-death-penalty
http://www.gluckman.com/Death'Penalty.htm