Surname 1

Name
Professor
Course
Date
Anthropology
Human beings relate to each other in terms of social, economic and political, hence it is
paramount to study how each individual live since they come from different background. The
study of how people have to relate to each other understanding and respecting one another is
referred to Anthropology. It is subdivided into how they speak (linguistic), relate with each other
(social), how they lived in the past (archaeology), and their physical development (biological,
and physical) (Nair et al., 212).
A thesis study by two scientist states that all human beings have their origin, but the crisis
arises because they continuously undergo transitional period. The old nature elapses without
being replaced by viable elements, but rather develops mutations in nature. Despite the above
fact, in the late 1970s another study was carried out showing how various disciplines relate to
each other producing a completely new offspring, which bears the two characteristics of their
original parent. Through such experimental researches about life, Anthropologist came with a
concrete hypothesis to counter the problem of living in a diverse world. A thesis of crisis has
emerged from time in memorial, but currently few theories have tried to solve it (Besterfield and
Dale 113).
Besterfield and Dale (214), States that such uncertainties emerge due to failure of the
total, describing the social reality of how people relate with each other despite their past lives.

Surname 2
The second phase of the problem is failing to explain the various differences that arise within
such individuals. Thirdly, tracing the origin of such people is paramount, so as to enable scorers
understand in order to solve the crisis. By so doing, the interpretive mechanism has enabled ease
communication between the two parties. Series of experiment follows, allowing various diverse
communities to talk and understand each other. Language in any party enables each other to
know where they come from hence respecting each others culture and traditions. Concisely, this
segment of interpretive Anthropology, outline two main pillars of tension, such as tendency in
writing of the Old Stone Age people in relation to how they communicated amongst themselves.
The second pillar entailed conventional Anthropology that concentrated on social- economic. It
entails the anthropology on how people live, and relate to each other. In actual sense, people live
in hardship where they do not understand one another effectively as they belong to different
ethnic society, which practice different cultures and speak unfamiliar language to each other
(Nair et al., 201).
In the later stages Anthropologist, used defamiliarization as a way to deal with cultural
differences where they keenly study how each and every community practiced their culture.
They used various experiment to explain their findings, and at the long end, they came up with a
concrete analysis of the crisis caused by human anatomy. In comparison, Breslow and Lester
(210), argues that Anthropologist had a rough time to discern, understand each as a language
barrier, hostility from some communities, adverse weather conditions among others.
Ethnographic was repatriated due to cultural differences; they tried all they could to assemble
interpreters to give their ideas in order to make them understand each other. When they were
successful cultural differences were juxtapositioned, leading to sharing and borrowing of cultures
from one community to another enabling a conducive living amongst them. The large globe was

Surname 3
transformed into one tiny community that shared values in the surrounding as one (Breslow and
Lester 221)
Despite the above fact, little differences still emerge, which make people fight over petty
issues majorly on land disputes from grazing fields and livestock raiding among others. The
spirit of anthropology to study how human relate to each other cannot immediately end opting
successes to their motives. The study seems interesting, as learners never get bored at all, as they
learn various ethnic differences (Besterfield and Dale 217).

Surname 4
Works Cited
Besterfield, Dale H. anthropology as cultural crisis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2013.
Print.
Breslow, Lester. anthropology. New York: Macmillan Reference, 2012. Print: Theory and
Practice. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2010. Print.
Nair, Raj, and Donald Bennett. Power Integrity Analysis and anthropology Circuits. Upper
Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010. Print.
.