Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Major assignment
Due in around three weeks time
Tuesday 4 October 2016 no later than 5
pm.
Online submission only.
Public holiday
Monday 3 October 2016 (immediately
after mid-semester break) is a public
holiday.
No lecture that day.
Monday lecture students will need to
listen to recording of Wednesday
lecture, which will be uploaded to
Moodle.
3
This week
Consumer Protection
Consumer Law - the statutory provisions:
Unconscionable conduct
Misleading or deceptive conduct
False representations
Defences
Remedies
No refunds
Implied guarantees for sellers and manufacturers
Overview
On completion of this week in you should be able to:
Explain what is unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the Australian
Consumer Law (ACL)
Explain what is meant by misleading or deceptive conduct in s 18, ACL and
identify different types of conduct that might be misleading or deceptive
Identify the different types of false representations set out in s 29, ACL
Identify defences available for breaches of the consumer protection provisions
Suggest possible remedies for breaches of the consumer protection provisions
Explain what the law says about no refund signs
Identify the non-excludable implied guarantees applicable to consumer
contracts
10
The Regulator
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)
Regulator responsible for administering the CCA
Primary responsibility: to ensure individuals and businesses
comply with Commonwealth consumer protection, fair trading
and competition/trade practices laws
Until 1995, was the Trade Practices Commission (TPC)
Also see: http://www.accc.gov.au
(Further discussion on role of ACCC later in lecture)
11
12
13
Unconscionable conduct
The unconscionability provisions provide consumers
(and small business) with protection from
unconscionable (unfair) conduct
14
Unconscionable conduct
Where one party to a transaction is at a disadvantage, because
of:
age
sickness
illiteracy
financial needs
lack of explanation when required
language (i.e. non-English speaking) and the other party
takes advantage of this for gain
15
Unconscionable conduct
Amadios case:
The plaintiff has to establish:
They were in a position of special disadvantage
That substantially affected their ability to protect
themselves
The defendant knew, or ought to have known, of the
plaintiffs disability and not taken advantage of it
AND
Actions of defendant were unconscionable
16
Unconscionable conduct
Section 20 (ACL): defines unconscionability in general terms
A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct
that is unconscionable within the meaning of the unwritten law
from time to time.
Applies equitable principles from Commercial Bank of Australia
Ltd v Amadio to business disputes
Section 21: prohibits statutory unconscionability in connection with
the supply or acquisition of goods or services
Section 22: statutory checklist (see next slide)
17
Unconscionable conduct
Section 22
Relative bargaining positions of the parties
Did the consumer have to comply with conditions that were
not reasonably necessary?
Did the consumer understand the documentation?
Was there any undue influence, pressure or unfair tactics?
Could the consumer have obtained the same goods or
services elsewhere
See Gibson & Fraser at pp 629-632
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Misleading/deceptive conduct
What is conduct?
Conduct has a broad meaning and includes:
Statements of opinion
Broken promises and false predictions
Statements that are literally true but which create a false impression
Pre-contractual statements
Silence
BUT: 'puffery' or self-evident exaggeration that are promotional
statements in advertising and that cannot be taken literally (eg 'the
juiciest oranges in Qld, Red Bull gives you wings), will not be taken to
infringe s 18
30
'Silence'
Silence may be misleading or deceptive:
No general duty of disclosure BUT conduct may be misleading
or deceptive if failure to communicate a relevant fact may cause
the true representation of another fact to be misleading
ASK: is there a REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF
DISCLOSURE?
Case: Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd
See Gibson & Fraser at p 621
31
Misleading/deceptive conduct
What is NOT misleading or deceptive?
Mere confusion or causing uncertainty will not amount to conduct
that is misleading or deceptive.
McWilliams Wines Pty Ltd v McDonalds System of Australia Pty
Ltd
Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu
32
33
False Representations
False Representations: s 29 (ACL)
Breach of section 29 will result in either:
- prosecution by the ACCC for a criminal offence
OR
- the injured party being provided with civil remedies (eg
damages).
The section prohibits the making of false representations in
connection with the promotion and supply of goods and services
in 14 subsections.
False Representations
s 29(1)(a): No false representation about the standard, degree
of quality, value, grade, composition, style, model, history
or previous use of goods
s 29(1)(b) no false representations regarding services
s 29(1)(c): no false representations that goods are new
s 29(1)(d): no false representations that goods or services
have been ordered
s 29(1)(e)/(f): no false representations regarding testimonials
relating to goods or services
s 29(1)(g): no false representations about performance
characteristics, accessories, uses or benefits of goods or
services
s 29(1)(h): no false representations regarding sponsorship,
approval or affiliation
35
False Representations
s 29(1)(i): no false representations about the price of goods or
services
s 29(1)(j): no false representations about repair facilities or
spare parts
s 29(1)(k): no false representations about place of origin
s 29(1)(l): no false representations about the need for any
goods or services
s 29(1)(m): no false representations about the existence,
exclusion or effect of any condition, warranty, guarantee,
right or remedy
S 29(1)(n): no false representations concerning a requirement
to pay for a contractual right
36
37
38
39
Consumer Guarantees
when goods are supplied
40
41
42
Defences
Defences for breach include:
reasonable mistake of fact
breach caused by a third party or due to some cause beyond the
control of the defendant
defendant took reasonable precautions and exercised due
diligence to avoid contravention
publishers defence: reliance on information supplied by another
person, information/advertisement received in the ordinary course
of business and publisher had no reason to suspect that
publication would breach the ACL
See Gibson & Fraser at p 655
43
44
45
46
47
48
Next lecture
Competition law
Gibson & Fraser, ch 23
49