Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Presented to
Presented by
ANIFE L. MOSQUEDA
BOOK SUMMARY
ETHICS
A Class Manual in Moral Philosophy
By
Right Rev. Msgr. PAUL J. GLENN, Ph.D., S.T.D.
GENERAL ETHICS
CHAPTER 1. HUMAN ACTS
In this Chapter, we have studied the human act itself, the definition of its terms,
classify its varieties, discerns its essential elements, and discuss the things that way
modify the human act make it less human.
This Chapter is conveniently divided into the following Articles:
Article 1. The Human Act in Itself
Article 2. The Voluntaries of Human Acts
Article 3. The Modifiers of Human Acts
We also learn the definition of the Human Act stated that A human Act is acts
which proceed from the deliberate free will of man.
We have defined human act that have contrasted it with act of man. We have
noticed in passing that the human act stands related to the dictates of reason, and is, in
consequence, a moral act.
We have classified human acts as elicited and commanded acts, and have
viewed them in their moral aspect as good, evil and indifferent acts. We have seen that
the human act is essentially the product to the will (voluntary act) acting with native
freedom in the light of intellectual knowledge.
We have studied also the subject of voluntariness in human acts. We have
distinguished voluntariness as perfect and imperfect; simple and conditional; direct and
indirect; positive and negative; actual, virtual, habitual and interpretative. We gave
special study to the subject of indirect voluntariness, stating and exemplifying two
important ethical principles, viz., 1. The Principle of Immutability of Evil indirectly willed.
2. The Principle of Immutability of a twofold effect.
In this lengthy Article we have studied the modifiers of human acts, and have
endeavoured to determine their general influence upon human acts. We have studied
the following principles, learning how and why each is valid:
Regarding Ignorance
Invincible ignorance destroys the voluntariness of an act.
Vincible ignorance does not destroy the voluntariness of an act.
Vincible ignorance in one way lessens the voluntariness and in
another way increases it.
Regarding Concupiscence
Antecedent concupiscence lessens the voluntariness of an act.
Antecedent concupiscence does not destroy the voluntariness of an
act.
Consequent concupiscence, however great, does not lessen the
voluntariness of an act.
Regarding Fear
An act from fear, however great, is simply voluntary, although it is
regularly also conditionally involuntary.
Regarding Violence
Acts elicited by the will are not subject to violence; external acts
Caused by violence, to which due resistance is offered, are in no
wise imputable to the agent.
Regarding Habit
Habit does not destroy voluntariness; and acts from habit are
always voluntary, at least in cause, as long as the habit is allowed
to endure
what living is, and merely to say what is to be done without explaining how it is to be
done, still we cannot but take from the study of sound Ethics an urge to upright conduct.
As Christians, we take an especial pleasure in finding the scientific exposition of the
bases of morality and of the rational nature of good human action.
SPECIAL ETHICS
CHAPTER 1. RIGHTS AND DUTIES
The Nature of Right is subjectively as a moral power residing in a person and has
seen that its basis is law and ultimately the Eternal Law. The right divided as Natural,
Positive, Divine, Human, Ecclesiastical, and civil; as right of property and right of
jurisdiction; as alienable and inalienable; as juridical and non-juridical. We also learn the
properties of right such as coaction, limitation, and collision, and have discussed, under
the last named subject, the solution of an apparent conflict of rights. Its expressed and
justified the true doctrine of the subject of right, and has seen that this must be a person
and only a person. We also learn the Nature of duty as a moral obligation binding a
person to do or to omit something. We have seen that duty is the necessary correlative
of right. We distinguished duty as natural, positive, affirmative, negative, perfect and
imperfect. We have considered greater and lesser duties, and have seen that where
these come in conflict, the lesser ceases to be a duty.
SOCIAL ETHICS
CHAPTER I THE FAMILY
The Family is the root of the society. This chapter treats briefly of society in
general and of domestic society in particular. Family is founded by marriage and
parenthood. It discusses the subjects of marriage and the rights and duties of parents.
Its shown that man is a social animal and that society is a requirement of his nature and
not the result of a free agreement or convention among men. It also shown the divisions
of society and have noticed the important fact that the only perfect societies are the
Church and the State. Marriage is truly a natural institution, obliging mankind collectively
but not distributive. Its also shown that the reasonable position of the Church in the
matter of marriage legislation. The two properties of marriage are unity and
indissolubility and have demonstrated the illicit character of practices opposed to these
properties, such as polyandry, polygamy, and divorce. Husband and wife and in the
family, which is established by father, mother and child. Its justified the declaration that
the normal and natural seat of that authority is the husband and father.