Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
:
ROYM. WHI-rhrAN, n m .
FORGETTING DREAMS
IN PSYCHOANALYSIS
HE DmzAhr remains the royal road to the unconscious i n psychoanalysis. Few analyses proceed without the examination of
the patients dreams a t one time or another. Factors, then,
which block the bringing of dreams to the analytic session must be
delineated. T h e aim of this paper is to examine processes operative
in dream forgetting and the implication of these for theory and
practice.
Theoretical and practical conclusions in this paper will come
from three sources: (1) psychophysiological research using the
Kleitman-Aserinsky technique of recovering dreams (2, 3, 1 1, 12,
13, 34, 43, 45, 46,47); (2) the psychoanalytic literature bearing on
this problem (1, 8, 17, 19, 32, 33, 36); and (3) a specific psychoanalytically oriented research project (44) done on the problem of
dream recall using the Kleitman-Aserinsky technique.
752
Downloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
753
754
755
Psychoanalytic Fornzulations
I n his chapter on The Forgetting of Dreams, Freud (19) emphasized the importance of repression or censorship in the forgetting of dreams. H e had published a previous paper on the psychical mechanism of forgetting i n general which later became,
with modifications, the first chapter of The Psychopathology of
Everyday Life. H e had outlined the process of repression and censorship and called it resistance when describing this process in the
course of analysis. H e was careful, however, not to claim an absolute role for repression and resistance: the forgetting of dreams
is to a great extent a product of resistance. . . . the forgetting of
dreams depends far more upon the resistance than upon the fact
stressed by the authorities, that the waking and sleeping states are
alien to each other. This more cautious statement using the
terms, great extent and far more is in contrast to Bertram
Lewin who wrote the most complete recent paper on the forgetting of dreams (33) and said, All forgetting of dreams o r dream
elements, all blurring of the picture, all of the dreamers doubts
about the contents, are signs of resistance to the dream elements.
Freud (21) goes on to say that the agent chiefly responsible
for this forgetting is the mental resistance to the dream which
has already done what i t could against it during the night. His
explanation as to why dreams should occur at all in the face of
this resistance is that during the night the resistance loses some of
its power though not the whole of it. Then, on awakening, i t regains its power and proceeds to get rid of what it was obliged to
permit when it was weak.
As is well known, the concept of repression underwent a
number of revisions through the years of Freuds writings. Brenners (9) excellent summary of these changes divides them into
four periods. I n the first (1894-1896) repression was seen as the
active suppression of a memory, at first considered to be a conscious, voluntary act. From 1896-1906, Freud described a psychic
apparatus (19, Chapt. VII) composed of the three traditional systems, the unconscious (Ucs.), the preconscious (Pcs.), and the perceptual conscious (Pcpt.-Cs.). T h e repression of infantile experiences, later (191 1) called primal repression, he ascribed to the
Downloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
756
ROY M. WHIThfAN
system Pcs. This store of infantile memories and wishes gave rise
to preconscious derivatives which were barred from consciousness
by repression proper, a withdrawal of cathexis* from these derivatives by the Pcs.
During 1911-1915, Freud added the concept of countercathexis as repressing forces which, if unsuccessful, led to a return
of the repressed. I n the fourth period, 1923-1939, Freud reformulated his theory of the psychic apparatus in structural terms. T h e
concept of repression both contributed to these changes and was
affected by these changes. Anxiety became the motive for repression which the ego employs against an instinctual drive. T h e target
of repression is usually a libidinal drive but may be also an aggressive drive. T h e mechanism is the establishment of a countercathexis by the ego. T h e drive, however, persists i n the id and
may return via dreams which are compromise formations illustrating the return of the repressed which occurs during any weakening of the egos defenses such as by illness or sleep.
T h e other major trend in psychoanalytic writings which we
must consider since Lewin makes it the crucial issue in his formulation of the forgetting of dreams is the notion of the dream
screen. Fliess (17) in his coverage of the dream literature u p until
1953 says that Lewins (32) hypothesis of the dream screen has
perhaps contributed more than any other to the sustaining of the
current revival of interest i n the dream. Lewins concept of the
screen is that it represents the breast. Fliess quotes a flawless interpretation of a dream of a patient by Lewin which demonstrates
the heuristic value of this hypothesis.
Lewin (33) describes a striking example of watching a patient
forget a dream right before his eyes. T h e patient was ready to tell
the dream when she saw it suddenly curve over backwards away
from her and then like a canvas or a carpet roll u p and away into
the distance. . , , For the patient, it was a weaning experience.
To Lewin, then, dream forgetting stands for weaning. H e gives
a number of impressive examples from his own and others practices where the associations lead rather convincingly to the equivalence of dream forgetting and loss of the breast.
H e goes on to quote William Jamess analogy of looking for a
forgotten idea, and of rummaging i n the house for a lost object.
Downloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
757
In both cases we visit what seems to us the probable neighborhood of that which we miss. Using this allegory, Lewin offers the
intriguing thought that the house must be a symbol for the body
and that his experience indicates that the foigotten dream takes
one of two paths: either it goes inward, that is, stomachward, or it
goes away carried along by the illusively departing breast.
Lewin adds that to remember the dream is a quasi prolongation of sleep and stands for sleep, while forgetting the dream
repeats and stands for waking u p and is a step in the weaning
process.
Rycroft (38) has further elaborated Lewins concept. He suggests that, i n addition to the fulfillment of the wish to sleep at the
maternal breast (Lewin), the dream screen may represent an attempt in the course of an analysis to re-establish an object relationship with the mother via the transference. H e points out that
this type of dream is likely to occur when patients with narcissistic fixation are attempting to establish emotional contact with
the outside world. Boyer (8) continuing Rycrofts suggestions
added that the dream. screen-phenomenon appears when there is
not only a state of development when narcissistic identification is
giving way to true object relationships, but also when there is a
threat of loss of the new object, and an event occurs reminiscent
of an old desertion trauma.
758
759
atrist. This fact increased the original scope of this research from,
TVhich dream does the patient tell? to include, TVhich dream
does the patient not tell?
These two patients, a male and a femaie, the latter being a
volunteer patient, recalled 31 dreams and 54 dreams respectively of 16 and 13 nights awakenings and reported 22 and 78 per
cent of these to the therapist. TVith the male patient, dreams were
not specifically asked for until half way through the experiment,
and this may partly explain the striking difference in percentages.
However, individual factors, educational and psychodynamic,
were also crucial. T h e male was a sociopathic veteran with a grammar school education, and the woman, a graduate student, highly
verbal, was a compliant, schizoid patient highly motivated to produce and perform well. Examination of the dreams which were
left out led to the hypothesis that dreams which were ego alien in
terms of the relationship with the psychiatrist at that moment
were repressed even though they had already been remembered
and recorded during the night by the experimenter. TVe were able
to expand this hypothesis to include the relationship with the
listener when some strikingly hostile and sexual dreams about
the experimenter were told only to the psychiatrist, and hostile
and sexual dreams about the psychiatrist were told only to the
experimenter.
Thus, the male patient reported dreams to the experimenter
which consisted of one man tattooing another, one man asking another to come and see his drawings, and being shown a picture oE
where a bullet entered a man (all, even at a thematic manifest
level, clearly referring to homosexual situations and penetration
fantasies). All of these dreams were omitted when the patient was
asked to recount his dreams one day later to the therapist. I n contrast, dreams which zuere reported consisted of telling the therapist
of helping a girl look for a dog, getting out of jail and going to
search for his family so as to provide for them, and dating women
in addition to his wife. All of these defended against his passivedependent, homosexual relationship to the therapist by presenting
himselE as a highly adequate male, who takes care of family responsibilities and seduces women.
Several examples of the woman subjects dreams could be
Downloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
760
ROY M. WHlTAIAN
761
were not recalled the next day. O n a more microscopic level, one
can observe that even the change in the relationship which occurred during the course of a session caused previously repressed
dreams to appear, Oh, yes, now I remember a dream I had. . . .
This is another way of looking at the process of working through
an intrapsychic resistance as it manifests itself in the interpersonal
analytic relationship. T h e teller no longer fears the disapproval
of the listener.
T h e dream material could be divided into three categories:
(1) material which is told to both the experimenter and the psychiatrist and seems to contain the characteristic personality theme,
nuclear conflicts, and genetic trauma of the person; (2) dreams not
told to the experimenter which were related to the patients specific attitude toward him at that time; and (3) dreams not told to
the psychiatrist which were related to the patients specific attitude
toward him at that time. T h e last two dream groups are suppressed
o r repressed on he basis of anticipated negative responses by the
listener. T h e communicative function of the dream seems to become crucial.
I n a paper on the communicative function of the dream,
Mark Kanzer (28) suggests that the dream, in addition to serving
the function of guarding sleep, also serves to preserve object relations and the function of communication. Both the urge to tell
dreams and the primitive belief that they are divine messages
point to this function. H e quotes Freud as saying that the dream
thought, I must tell this to the analyst, as with the impulse to
write down the dream, is often associated with a resistance to
communication. Changes in the dreamers relationship to objects
may be expressed by falling and climbing and separation from the
object: for example, such typical dreams as losing teeth.
I t is important to emphasize the communicative function of
the dream i n order to explain the differential communications to
the experimenter and the psychiatrist. One must postulate that the
dreamer, at some level, has an understanding of how the latent
content of his communication and its potential affect the object.
I n this connection, it should be stressed, as did Rapaport (36), that
psychologists have vastly oversimplified Freuds concept of forgetting in terming it a forgetting of unpleasant material. Actually,
Downloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
762
ROY
nr.
WHITMAN
Disczcssio12
T h e Dream and Dreaming
Most workers using the Kleitman-Aserinsky techniques of recovering dreams are more interested in the process of dreaming,
whereas the above study placed its emphasis on the dream. TYhichever direction the current research i n dreaming may take, there
has already been established a physiological process of dreaming
occurring in all human beings and, if REhl is the judge, in other
mammals as well. But the dream itself is a uniquely individual
product as well as the expression of a psychophysiological property of the higher neural centers of dreaming.
Only Ranzer (29) has emphasized this dichotomy as a determinant of forgetting and recollecting dreams. Thus lie points out
that not only may the forgotten dream represent a part of the
body (such as the breast, feces, a baby, the genitals, etc.) but i t
may also represent a bodily function (such as urinating, menstruating, defecating, etc.). H e emphasizes the common clinical
observation that recall of the dream often occurs when the analysand is engaged in some automatic action and these actions, as, for
example, in his morning ablutions, often are clues to the meaning
of the dream.
A n Attempt at a Theoretical Formulation
We have seen that experimental studies in dream forgetting support Freuds earlier emphasis on two types of repression, primary
and secondary. Apparently both groups of dreams are accessible to
recovery in the course of the day or in a therapeutic session by
some perception touching off a chain of associations leading to the
manifest content of the dream.
Neurophysiologically and neuropsychologically oriented investigators have been intrigued with the problem of dream forDownloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
763
I64
765
766
ROY M. WHITMAN
767
may be, and often is, used as a resistance, but then so can free
association itself. T h e patient may compulsively free associate and
when the analyst tries to interpret his remarks or get him to
cooperate in an examination of his productions, the patient will
answer that he has been told his job is only to free associate.
Many of my patients occasionally write down single words
of dreams which enables them to hold onto the dream. Much like
a string attached to it, one patient said. This is reminiscent of the
fantastically fruitful observation of Freuds concerning the boy who
could symbolically recapture his mother via a string attached to a
toy. This leads back to the initial remarks of Lewin directly equating the breast and the dream screen.
T h e usefulness of some patients writing down dreams has
been shown repeatedly in practice. But theoretically there is also
substantiation for this. This resides in the reasoning wherein
not every instance of dream forgetting is due to resistance. Much
dream forgetting seems to be due to a functional demand on the
ego and the incompatibility of the primary and secondary processes. Therefore it is reasonable that the patient might use the
ego technique of recording a fraction or all of the dream, overcoming the tendency of most dreams to be forgotten and superimposing the secondary process of writing and recording on
primary-process activity. Once written, just as once recorded in our
study, the dreamer often need look no longer at his notes. Because
some patients find this helpful, however, is no reason to make
this a necessity for all, as Gutheil does (25). He labels failure to
write down the dream as resistance. If the analyst recommends
this, it often may become a pivotal point of ongoing stubbornness.
Patients refuse to do their homework or do it uselessly as a
passive-aggressive resistance. But accepting spontaneous writing
down does not make it a focus of defiance or resistance. Indeed,
one patient would often say that he was resistant when he failed
to make a note or two on his dreams. And, of course, there is no
doubt that written dreams easily make themselves available to
resistance, since writing may have the function of acting out rather
than remembering.
There are patients who think of no association, or of only
highly intellectual ones. I have had patients read the dream from
Downloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
768
the paper so quickly that I could not follow it, and then crumple
the paper and throw it into the wastebasket. Also, some patients
carefully record the dream and then equally carefully leave it at
home. There is no doubt that the resistances i f the moment may
overpower the wish to tell the dream.
But often the manifest text is very helpful to the analyst in
telling him just what are the resistances and against what the
patient is defending himself. T h e dream frequently offers an orientation of just where the analysis is at that time. This is really
a statement which raises a question as to who finds the dream most
valuable at a certain time. I think we would have to agree that it
may be more useful to the analyst, i n alerting him to certain
material or trends he should be interpreting or understanding in
other associations of the session. Thus an obsessive patient who
had few or no dreams during 300 hours of analysis complained
that he could not remember a dream long enough. Finally, it was
suggested to him that he might make a note about a dream. He
brought in a drcam to which he had no associations. A young
doctor was helping an older man sit up in the hospital. T h e
doctor was getting a great deal of praise for his ministrations and
help. This dream clarified for the analyst the chief resistance of
the analysis at that time, i.e., if the patient got well, the analyst
would get the credit since the patient was a well-known figure in
the community. His envy was actually causing a negative therapeutic reaction. I n later hours, this idea was demonstrated to the
patient who then spontaneously related i t back to the dream
himself.
T h e increasing use of the manifest content by the practiced
dream interpreter is a re-emerging phenomenon in psychoanalysis.
Freuds brilliant hypothesis about the latent as opposed to the
manifest content was so i n opposition to the way dreams were
dealt with in centuries before, that he had to stress, it seems, the
unimportance of the manifest content. As skill increases, intuitive
initial hypotheses about the manifest dream text become more
and more accurate (cf. Fromm and Frenchs use of intuitive
hunches in dream interpretation [22]).
I n recent years there has been an increasing number of attempts to use the manifest content as something more than the
Downloaded from apa.sagepub.com by Allan de Guzman on November 20, 2016
769
770
ROY M. WIIITMAN
771
also, in and of itself, a self-gratifying oral experience which substitutes for a primary nursing experience.
It would then seem that a satisfying oral experience is usually,
though not always, forgotten.3 Interruption of completion of the
dream, with the failure of oral satisfaction we are hypothesizing,
leads to a much higher percentage of dream recall. But again this
is only a single factor, for some patients dream recall is easier
when the dream finishes and is rounded off.
Thus the ever-recurring wish for a primary breast experience
becomes the prototype of hallucinatory wish fulfillment i n all subsequent dream life. Though the wishes of life become progressively more complex and subtle, this remains as the deepest
substrate occasionally to be revealed in regressive experiences
during the course of analysis or other intense psychological vicissitudes. T h e dream may be conceptualized as a minute oral
experience which maintains sleep by not only discharging drive
cathexis but offering a certain amount of oral gratification. This is
completely compatible with Freuds basic postulate that the dream
has a sleep-protecting function.
Summary
772
ROY M. WHITMAN
773
774
ROY M. WHITMAN