Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • Master Data Hasil

    Enviado por

    Onga Iki
    15 visualizações4 páginas
    The document contains frequency tables and crosstabulations analyzing the relationships between air quality group (airgrp), jungle quality group (JJgrp), and swamp quality group (JSgrp) and the occurrence of diarrhea (diare) in a sample of 129 people. It finds that those in the "baik" quality groups for air, jungle and swamp had lower rates of diarrhea than those in the "tdk baik" groups, with air quality showing the strongest association. Risk estimates show those in the "baik" air quality group were 5.9 times less likely to have diarrhea than the "tdk baik" group.

    Descrição original:

    sdf

    Direitos autorais

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formatos disponíveis

    DOCX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    The document contains frequency tables and crosstabulations analyzing the relationships between air quality group (airgrp), jungle quality group (JJgrp), and swamp quality group (JSgrp) and the occurrence of diarrhea (diare) in a sample of 129 people. It finds that those in the "baik" quality groups for air, jungle and swamp had lower rates of diarrhea than those in the "tdk baik" groups, with air quality showing the strongest association. Risk estimates show those in the "baik" air quality group were 5.9 times less likely to have diarrhea than the "tdk baik" group.

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato DOCX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    15 visualizações4 páginas

    Master Data Hasil

    Enviado por

    Onga Iki
    The document contains frequency tables and crosstabulations analyzing the relationships between air quality group (airgrp), jungle quality group (JJgrp), and swamp quality group (JSgrp) and the occurrence of diarrhea (diare) in a sample of 129 people. It finds that those in the "baik" quality groups for air, jungle and swamp had lower rates of diarrhea than those in the "tdk baik" groups, with air quality showing the strongest association. Risk estimates show those in the "baik" air quality group were 5.9 times less likely to have diarrhea than the "tdk baik" group.

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato DOCX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 4

    Frequencies

    Statistics
    airgrp
    N

    Valid
    Missing

    129
    0
    .57

    Mean

    airgrp

    Valid

    baik
    tdk baik
    Total

    Frequency
    55
    74
    129

    Percent
    42.6
    57.4
    100.0

    Valid Percent
    42.6
    57.4
    100.0

    Cumulative
    Percent
    42.6
    100.0

    Frequencies
    Statistics
    JJgrp
    N

    Valid
    Missing

    129
    0
    .66

    Mean

    JJgrp

    Valid

    baik
    tdk baik
    Total

    Frequency
    44
    85
    129

    Percent
    34.1
    65.9
    100.0

    Valid Percent
    34.1
    65.9
    100.0

    Cumulative
    Percent
    34.1
    100.0

    Frequencies
    Statistics
    JSgrp
    N

    Valid
    Missing

    Mean

    129
    0
    .79
    JSgrp

    Valid

    baik
    tdk baik
    Total

    Frequency
    27
    102
    129

    Percent
    20.9
    79.1
    100.0

    Valid Percent
    20.9
    79.1
    100.0

    Cumulative
    Percent
    20.9
    100.0

    Crosstabs
    Case Processing Summary

    airgrp * diare

    Cases
    Missing
    N
    Percent
    0
    .0%

    Valid
    N
    Percent
    129
    100.0%

    Total
    N
    129

    Percent
    100.0%

    airgrp * diare Crosstabulation


    diare
    tidak
    airgrp

    baik
    tdk baik

    Total

    Count
    % within airgrp
    Count
    % within airgrp
    Count
    % within airgrp

    28
    50.9%
    11
    14.9%
    39
    30.2%

    ya

    Total

    27
    49.1%
    63
    85.1%
    90
    69.8%

    55
    100.0%
    74
    100.0%
    129
    100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Value
    19.433b
    17.762
    19.667

    Pearson Chi-Square
    a
    Continuity Correction
    Likelihood Ratio
    Fisher's Exact Test
    Linear-by-Linear
    Association
    N of Valid Cases

    19.283

    df
    1
    1
    1
    1

    Asymp. Sig.
    (2-sided)
    .000
    .000
    .000

    Exact Sig.
    (2-sided)

    Exact Sig.
    (1-sided)

    .000

    .000

    .000

    129

    a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


    b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.
    63.
    Risk Estimate

    Value
    Odds Ratio for airgrp
    (baik / tdk baik)
    For cohort diare = tidak
    For cohort diare = ya
    N of Valid Cases

    95% Confidence
    Interval
    Lower
    Upper

    5.939

    2.589

    13.627

    3.425
    .577
    129

    1.872
    .433

    6.265
    .767

    Crosstabs
    Case Processing Summary

    JJgrp * diare

    Cases
    Missing
    N
    Percent
    0
    .0%

    Valid
    N
    Percent
    129
    100.0%

    Total
    N
    129

    Percent
    100.0%

    JJgrp * diare Crosstabulation


    diare
    tidak
    JJgrp

    baik
    tdk baik

    Total

    Count
    % within JJgrp
    Count
    % within JJgrp
    Count
    % within JJgrp

    19
    43.2%
    20
    23.5%
    39
    30.2%

    ya

    Total

    25
    56.8%
    65
    76.5%
    90
    69.8%

    44
    100.0%
    85
    100.0%
    129
    100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Value
    5.309b
    4.418
    5.181

    Pearson Chi-Square
    a
    Continuity Correction
    Likelihood Ratio
    Fisher's Exact Test
    Linear-by-Linear
    Association
    N of Valid Cases

    5.268

    df
    1
    1
    1
    1

    Asymp. Sig.
    (2-sided)
    .021
    .036
    .023

    Exact Sig.
    (2-sided)

    Exact Sig.
    (1-sided)

    .027

    .019

    .022

    129

    a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


    b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.
    30.
    Risk Estimate

    Value
    Odds Ratio for JJgrp
    (baik / tdk baik)
    For cohort diare = tidak
    For cohort diare = ya
    N of Valid Cases

    95% Confidence
    Interval
    Lower
    Upper

    2.470

    1.133

    5.383

    1.835
    .743
    129

    1.100
    .560

    3.061
    .986

    Crosstabs
    Case Processing Summary

    JSgrp * diare

    Cases
    Missing
    N
    Percent
    0
    .0%

    Valid
    N
    Percent
    129
    100.0%

    Total
    N
    129

    Percent
    100.0%

    JSgrp * diare Crosstabulation


    diare
    tidak
    JSgrp

    baik
    tdk baik

    Total

    Count
    % within JSgrp
    Count
    % within JSgrp
    Count
    % within JSgrp

    13
    48.1%
    26
    25.5%
    39
    30.2%

    ya

    Total

    14
    51.9%
    76
    74.5%
    90
    69.8%

    27
    100.0%
    102
    100.0%
    129
    100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Value
    5.196b
    4.178
    4.913

    Pearson Chi-Square
    a
    Continuity Correction
    Likelihood Ratio
    Fisher's Exact Test
    Linear-by-Linear
    Association
    N of Valid Cases

    5.156

    df
    1
    1
    1
    1

    Asymp. Sig.
    (2-sided)
    .023
    .041
    .027

    Exact Sig.
    (2-sided)

    Exact Sig.
    (1-sided)

    .033

    .023

    .023

    129

    a. Computed only for a 2x2 table


    b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.
    16.
    Risk Estimate

    Value
    Odds Ratio for JSgrp
    (baik / tdk baik)
    For cohort diare = tidak
    For cohort diare = ya
    N of Valid Cases

    95% Confidence
    Interval
    Lower
    Upper

    2.714

    1.130

    6.521

    1.889
    .696
    129

    1.131
    .476

    3.155
    1.018

    Você também pode gostar