Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Page 1 of 18
1. Introduction
High-rise Apartment
(S+32 upper floors)
Luxury
Apartment
(S+25 upper
floors)
Premium Apartment
(S+18 upper floors)
Page 2 of 18
The project consists of 5 towers of high rise apartment structures, 24 nos. villas, 5
towers of premium apartments and 4 towers of Luxury apartments.This Report briefs the
structural analysis and design process involved.
Page 3 of 18
2. Structural system:
Column elements
Beam elements
Slab elements
Page 4 of 18
Column elements
Beam elements
Slab elements
Image: Extruded view of the structural system at the 1st floor level
The Structural system is cast in-situ RCC framed structure having Slabs, Beams &
Columns.
The podium system is a waffle slab system for long spans and such a system
possesses high Strength to Weight ratios.
The lift walls are idealized as Shear walls to transmit lateral forces to the foundation.
3. Structural Analyses and Design
A three dimensional structural analysis iscarried out to obtain stress resultants and
deflections. Standard finite element software namely ETABS was used to analyze and design
the structure.
Beams and Columns are modeled as Frame Elements with 6 DOFs,majority of the
floor objects as Membrane Elements and rest of the floor as Shell Elements with 6 DOFs.
The RCC floor slabs are idealized as Rigid Diaphragms to effectively transfer the
lateral forces.
The Lift walls are modeled as Shear walls connected with link elements, to the main
structure for their composite action in resisting the lateral forces derived from Wind and
Earthquakes.
Page 5 of 18
Image: Floor plans line diagram indicating column sizes (upto 1st Floor)
Image: Floor plans line diagram indicating column sizes (for typical floors)
The reaction from the superstructure at the foundation level, obtained from
preliminary analysis is tabulated below.
Page 6 of 18
Load
FX
KN
FY
KN
FZ(gravi
ty)
KN
SW
0.1
-0.06
214631.
2
MX
KN-M
189828
5
49747.0
2
417174
104402.
1
33948.5
9
10966.5
6
413695.
4
918675
287081
102048
LIVE
0.06
-0.01
WALL
0.16
-0.06
FF
0.02
-0.01
FILL
0.04
0.01
=
MZ
KN-M
1.256
0.378
2.985
0.042
1.115
( 41370 MT)
SW
LIVE
WALL
FF
FILL
super built-up per floor
MY
KN-M
458564
8
106536
3
222067
7
726972
234384
704 m2
Page 7 of 18
4. Material specification
a) Proposed Concrete grades:
All structural concrete shall have characteristic cube strength varying from 25 N/mm 2
to 60 N/mm2 at 28 days (M25, M30, M35, M40,M45, M50, M55& M60).Leveling course
of plain cement concrete shall have characteristiccube strength of 10N/mm2 at 28 days
(M10).
b) Proposed Reinforcement grades
High yield strength deformed (HYSD) bars withYield Strength of 500N/mm 2shall be
used within all R.C.C members exceptfor stirrups,wherein bars with Yield Strength of 415
N/mm2 are to be used. Bars of diameter 8, 10, 12,16,20,25& 32 shall be used.
5. Soil data
Soil data used in the design of foundations are strictly in accordance with the detailed
report provided by the soil consultant. After in-depth study of the bore-log data furnished
by the soil consultant, a Raft foundation is found to be ideal.
6. Load data
A) Super imposed loads
Weight of materials shall be calculated on the basis of unit weights given in I.S:875PART 1.
Unit weight of reinforced cement concrete
= 25 KN/m3
= 24 KN/m3
= 78.5 KN/m3
= 20.40 KN/m3
= 20 KN/m3
= 20 KN/m3
Water load
= 10 KN/m3
Page 8 of 18
= 19.2 KN/m3
= 1.5 KN/m2
= 1.0KN/m2
c) Live load
On the basis of intended occupancy & use,the loading shall be based on I.S: 875PART2.
Stair case
= 3kN/m2
Electrical Room
=7.5kN/m2
Toilets
=2kN/m2
Parking
=3.5kN/m2
D.G Room
Lobby
Balcony
Terrace
All other rooms
Page 9 of 18
d) Wind load
Wind loads for design of structures shall be based on the design wind speeds based on
I.S:875- PART 3.
= 33 m/sec
Risk co-efficient, k1
= 1.05
= 1.21
Page 10 of 18
Topography factor, k3
Design wind speed,vz
=1.00
= vb x k1 x k2x k3
= 0.6vz2
e) Seismic loads:
II
Zone factor
0.10
Importance factor
Page 11 of 18
3
=
ZxIxSa
2 xRxg
Medium Soil
The following Load cases were analyzedfor
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Load Combinations
1.5DL
1.5(DL+LL)
1.2(DL+LL+WLX)
1.2(DL+LL-WLX)
1.2(DL+LL+WLY)
1.2(DL+LL-WLY)
1.5(DL+WLX)
1.5(DL-WLX)
1.5(DL+WLY)
1.5(DL-WLY)
0.9DL+1.5WLX
0.9DL-1.5WLX
0.9DL+1.5WLY
0.9DL-1.5WLY
1.2(DL+LL+EQX)
1.2(DL+LL-EQX)
1.2(DL+LL+EQY)
1.2(DL+LL-EQY)
1.5(DL+EQX)
1.5(DL-EQX)
1.5(DL+EQY)
1.5(DL-EQY)
0.9DL+1.5EQX
0.9DL-1.5EQX
0.9DL+1.5EQY
0.9DL-1.5EQY
1.2(DL+LL+SPECX)
1.2(DL+LL+SPECY)
1.2(DL+LL+SPECZ)
1.5(DL+SPECX)
1.5(DL+SPECY)
1.5(DL+SPECZ)
0.9DL+1.5SPECX
0.9DL+1.5SPECY
0.9DL+1.5SPECZ
Page 12 of 18
Minimum
beam
width
200
Rib
width
of
slabs
Minimum
thickness
of floors
125
125
Column dimensions
Fully
exposed
50%
300
200
exposed
P<
0.4%
0.4%1%
P>1%
160
100
Beams
s.sup
40
Slabs
cont
30
s.sup
35
Ribs
cont
25
s.sup
45
Columns
cont
35
40
Page 13 of 18
Appendix:
Few results of Lateral load analysis
Drift-x at terrace
0.00014 < 0.004
Image: Deformed shape In the Analytical Model (Scaled to 200 times the actual)
Page 14 of 18
Page 15 of 18
Page 16 of 18
IS 456 2000
SP 16
SP- 34
IS 1786
IS 4326 1993
IS 1904
IS 2950
IS 800-1980
Page 17 of 18
Page 18 of 18