Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
txt
Citation Nr: 1626431
Decision Date: 06/30/16
DOCKET NO.
)
)
09-47 921 )
2.
3.
This appeal arises from a July 2007 rating decision of the Department of Ve
This claim was remanded by the Board to the AOJ in December 2012.
That add
The preponderance of the evidence does not demonstrate that the Veteran's i
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Prior to initial adjudication, VA sent the Veteran a July 2006 letter satis
The Board finds that VA met the duties to notify and assist for the claim f
The Board must determine the value of all evidence submitted, including lay
When the positive evidence supporting a claim and the negative evidence ind
A review of the service treatment records shows that the Veteran reported b
As for treatment records that do not relate to UTIs, menstrual pain, or ect
The May 2014 VA examiner specifically noted much of the Veteran's foregoing
After reviewing the service medical records, February 2014 X-rays, and Apri
Additionally, the Board notes that the Veteran submitted a medical article
The Veteran has a diagnosis of intervertebral disc syndrome.
Additionally, the Board notes that the Veteran had normal X-ray results aft
The Board finds that the Veteran herself is not competent to offer an opini
Accordingly, the Board finds that the preponderance of the evidence is agai
ORDER
Entitlement to service connection for a low back disability is denied.
REMAND
The Veteran claims service connection for sinus infections due to recurrent
Consistent with VA's duty to assist, the Veteran was provided VA examinatio
As for the chest pain claim, although the Veteran raised the theory that he
Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action:
1.
2.
3.
The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on t
This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment.
______________________________________________
Harvey P. Roberts
Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals
Department of Veterans Affairs