Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
3
Copyright 2001 by
THE NA'nONAI. COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS, INC.
'-
lgebra:
What Are We Teaching?
Mark Saul
Cuoco, Albert A.
The roles of representation in school mathematics / Albert A. Cuoco, Frances R. Curcio.
p. cm. (Yearbook; 2001)
Includes bibiiographical references.
ISBN 0-87353-495-6
1. MathematicsStudy and teaching. 2. Mental representation. I . Curcio, Frances R. II.
Title. III. Yearbook (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) ; 2001.
Q A l .N3 2001
[QAin
W H A T are we teaching when we think that our students are learning lgebra? lgebra is certainly a representational system. But what does it represent? How can we give students access to the concepts represented by algebraic notation?
To explore answers to these questions, we will here borrow a methodology
from the medicai profession. When a medicai researcher wants to know how
a certain chemical or physiological process works, he or she often looks at
the pathological cases, fmding a patient for whom the process works exceptionally well or extremely poorly. I n just this way, we can learn much from
our least able students.
510'.71dc21
2001030155
MEET BARRY
The publications of the National Council of Teachers of Mathenatics present a variety of viewpoints. The views expressed F
implied in this publication, unless otherwise noted, shoiild not be
interpreted as oficial positions of the Coimcil.
Ri;
36
LGEBRA: W H A T A R E W E T E A C H I N G ?
37
MEET MERRY
Merry graduated from high school three years ago. She aiso has significant
problems learning but has gotten further than Barry. After two years in a seifcontained classroom, she was mainstreamed into a regular mathematics class,
two years behind her grade levei. This was, for Merry, a major achievement.
Where B a r r y was taciturn, M e r r y was voiubie. On her good days, she
would iight up the classroom with her enthusiasm. On her bad days, everyone had to attend to Merry's excited conversation, which became a significant obstacie to learning for others.
Merry initiaiiy faced many of Barry's difficuities: a tendency to learn by
rote, a shaiiow grasp of operations on rationai numbers, a method of soiving
equations by trial and error, and a quick reach for the calculator before she
had decided what to do with it.
She learned to handie linear equations by "operating on both sides," when
they were posed in the form ax + b- c. (She had more difficulty if these were
in some other form.) She could solve quadratic equations by factoring (if the
coefflcient of x^ was 1) or by using the formula (with some difficulty if the
radicai had to be reduced or the fraction put in lowest terms). She had trouble putting a quadratic equation in canonicai form, and she had more trouble adding aigebraic fractions unless both denominators were the same simple monomiai.
Merry was not fiuent in the language of lgebra. Although she could factor
3x + 3y, the factoriziation of 3x + 7x gave her pause, and 3x + 7x^ was difficult. For Merry, these were three different kinds of problems. Similarly, she
could add 1/3 + 4/7, but not l / x + 4/y.
Merry knew how to factor x^ - y^. She learned to appiy this knowiedge to
factor a number like 2499 as 50^ - l l But when asked to factor 2CX^ - ISuy^
or I6x^y^ - 64ad or ( x -t- y)^ - (x + 3)^, she would say that she hadnt learned
this yet and would stare at the problem uncomprehendingiy.
What did Merry know that Barry did not know? What did Merry herseif
not know? What did the symbols of lgebra represent for each of these students? I needed some time and a certain amount of heip to figure this aU out.
38
LGEBRA: W H A T A R E W E TEACHING?
39
they were the ones sought, so as at length and in any manner to attain some conclusionthat is, equationfrom which it is permissible to derive the quantity
sought. In this fashion the most difficult problems are accomplished, ones whose
solution it w o u l d be useless to seek of arithrhetic aione. Yet arithmetic is so
instrumentai to lgebra in ali its operations that they seem jointiy to constitute
but a unique, complete computing science, and for that reason I shall expiain
both together.
40
LGEBRA: W H A T A R E W E T E A C H I N G ?
41
Merry does not understand this notion that the symbols of lgebra can
represent rationai expressions. For her, each factoring problem involving the
difference of two squares is a new chaiienge. For us, who can manipulate
rationai expressions easily, they are ali alike.
Our traditional lgebra texts are organized in just this way. Each page of
drill is a set of instances of a particular identity in the field of rationai expressions. When we use these drills with students, we are helping them to recognize how they are ali alike and helping them to build an internai representation of their similarity. This representation is the notion of aigebraic form
and is a significant step in abstraction. So in one sense, Gelfand's remark,
unlike Newtons, is a pedagogical note couched in mathematical terms.
Getting students to work in the field of rationai expressions is an important
pedagogical step in turning students' attention from the numbers of arithmetic
to operations in general. It is the step that I was not able to take with Merry.
INSTRUCTIONAL INTERVENTIONS
So now I defined for myself the problems I had to solve with Barry and
Merry. How could I go about trying to solve them? I had no simple answers,
but only suggestions and approximations.
For Barry, I tried using a "number story" technique as a transition to lgebra: there was this number x, and it got muitipiied by 2. Then I got added,
and the result was 7. What was the original number?
Barry knew the answer quickly i f I used small numbers. So I used the same
story to model the equation 2x + 1 = 247.1 reasoned, with Barry, that if 1 got
added to twice the number, and the result was now 247, then twice the number, before 1 was added, must have been 246. Then, i f the number was 246
after it had been doubled, it must have been 123 before it was doubled.
Barry followed this reasoning and could do a few more problems like this.
But he balked when the reasoning was expressed aigebraicaiiy. He dutifully
wrote down the following:
2x-F 1 = 247
-1
-1
2x = 246
E-2
^2
X = 123
42
This was just to please me. For the longest time, it had no meaning at ali
for Barry. Tellingly, he did not usuaiiy "get" the story solution unless I asked
the questions first ("What must the number have been before we added 1?").
This situation improved with time, and Barry was eventually able to solve
simple linear equations with numbers for which he could not use trial and
error. A n essential part of this process was played by the calculator. I would
give Barry an equation like 4.1567x- 3.2564 = 7.5342 and hold the calculator out of bis reach. He had to tell me what he wanted to do with the calculator, after which I allowed him to use it. This seemed to heip Barry turn bis
attention to the operations he was performing and away from the numbers
to which the operations applied. Barry was taking step two.
Both Barry and Merry benefited from another technique involving simple
rationai expressions. I asked them questions of the following form:
I f 2x + 3y = 3 and if 6x + 3 / = 5, how much does 8x + 6y equal?
I approached this set of exercises very concretely: I f 2 pens and 3 pencils cost
$3, and 6 pens and 3 pencils cost $7, how much will 8 pens and 6 pencils
cost?
They quickly found that they could not use trial and error. The problem
did not call for the values of x and y. They could, conceivably, guess at the
correct values for x and y, but these were fractions and not readily guessed.
Just in case they could guess, I would give them problems like this:
If X -F 2 / + 3z = 10 and 2x + y = 12, what is the value ofx + y+z?
The students learned to manipulate these expressions without evaluating
them, and so they began to think of aigebraic expressions in their own right,
without evaluating them. They aiso learned, later, to solve simultaneous
equations aigebraicaiiy and deveioped the idea of a linear combination of
vectors. That is, they could expiain that ix+2y
+ 3z=A and 2x + y= B,
then X -F y -F z = I / 3 ( A + B), sometimes using exactly the representation presented in this sentence.
Barry and Merry both learned from these techniques. Merry benefited
fforn one further technique, for which Barry was not yet ready.
This technique involved identiying the "role" of various expressions. That
- i s , after Merry f a t o r e d 4 x T - 9y^ as ( 2 x + 3 y ) ( 2 x - 3y), I would remind her
of the identity A^-B^ = {A + B){A - B) and ask her how the twFprBTeins
were the same. Eventually, she was able to articulate that 2x "played the role
of" A and 3y "played the role of" B. This phrase became part of her vocabulary, so that when she had trouble factoring or simplifying an expression, I
would ask her to compare it with a simpler expression and ask her for the
roles.
This last technique is one I find valuable for students at every levei: the
comprehension of aigebraic form is not a process that develops simply. For
LGEBRA: W H A T A R E W E TEACHING?
43
more advanced students learning to tame aigebraic fractions, I tell them that
simpliying
X + 1
X - 2
+
X -F 4
X + 3
is "the same as" simplifying 3/5 + 2/7. It seems to heip, and students learn
from this how to decide for themselves which arithmetic pattern the problem follows. (This technique exploits the fact that both rationai numbers
and rationai expressions have the structure of a field.)
And on a higher levei still, I use the "roles" idea with students doing aigebraic proofs. For example, such students often have trouble seeing that (x +
y)(p + q)^ (x+ y)p + (x + y)q is an appiication of the distributive law. I f we
State the latter as A(B + C) = AB + AC, asking "what plays the role of A," and
so forth, things often clear up. Indeed, if students cannot answer this question, they cannot understand the proof they are reading (or even writing!).
CONCLUSION
In working with Barry and Merry, I tried to use their difficuities in learning mathematics to probe more deeply into the nature of the mathematics
they were learning. I then tried to use what I found out to heip them surmount their difficuities.
I have described what I learned from the process, but what did the students learn? I have already seen Merry, in her mainstream class, get further
than I think she might have without my interventions. Barry didn't get as far,
but Tve noticed that bis understanding of arithmetic has advanced, and it
seems to me that it was pushed by bis experience with lgebra.
Neither Barry nor Merry may do any further academic work in mathematics, and neither may even need much mathematics in their careers. It
seems iikeiy to me, however, that their wrestling with the lgebra as a representation of generalizations in arithmetic and then as a study of operations,
and their using the abstraction of work with rationai expressions, shouid ali
contribute to their understanding of abstractions in general, and this understanding is a basic and valuable cognitive tool.
REFERENCE
Whiteside, Derek Thomas, ed. The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton, vol. 5. London: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
Promoting Multiple
Representations in lgebra
Alex Friedlander
Michal Tabach
no
174
P R O M O T I N G M U L T I P L E R E P R E S E N T A T I O N S I N ALGEBR.A
175
tions constrain each other, so that the space of permissible operators becomes
smaller; (c) when required to relate multiple representations to each other, the
learner has to engage in activities that promote understanding.
With lgebra learning, the use of computers contributes considerably to
the promotion of multiple representations (Heid 1995). As students work
with spreadsheets and graph plotters, aigebraic expressions become a natural
requirement and provide an effective means for obtaining a numerical and
graphical representation of the relevant data. In a learning environment that
lacks computers, drawing graphs or producing extended lists of numbers
tends to be tedious and unrewarding.
In the process of soiving a problem, isolating representations can be difficult. Thus in most situations, any approach is accompanied by verbal explanations or by numerical computations. I n this article we restrict ourselves to
the use of representations as mathematical tools (and less as means of communication) in the context of beginning lgebra. The use of a sequence or a
table to answer a question w i l l be an example of a numerical approach,
whereas the use of verbal reasoning (possibly including some computations
and numbers) will be considered a verbal approach. The use of graphs or
aigebraic expressions is easier to define and detect.
We cannot expect the ability to work with a variety of representations to
develop spontaneously. Therefore, when students are learning lgebra in
either a technologically based or a conventional environment, their awareness of and ability to use various representations must be promoted actively
and systematically. We describe some ways in which tasks can be designed to
promote the use of multiple representations. The following section presents,
as an example, an activity taken from a beginning lgebra course for seventh-grade students and discusses its potentiai to achieve this goal. We aiso
report some findings about students' use of representations in an assessment
task given at the end of one week of work on the activity.
DESIGNING TASKS
Students will be better able to solve a range of lgebra problems if they can move
easily from one type of representation to another. I n the middle grades, students
often begin with tables of numerical data to examine a pattern underlying a linear
function, but they shouid aiso learn to represent those data in the form of a graph
or equation when they wish to characterize the generaiized linear relationship.
Students shouid aiso become flexible in recognizing equivalent forms of linear
equations and expressions. This flexibility can emerge as students gain experience
with multiple ways of representing a contextualized problem.
In our attempts to promote student thinking and actions in a variety of representations, we found some effective types of tasks and questions. Our analysis of the structure of an activity called Savings illustrates the claim that tasks
can be designed to encourage the simultaneous use of several representations.
More specifically, Ainsworth, Bibby, and Wood (1998) mention three ways
that multiple representations may promote learning: (a) it is highly probable
that different representations express different aspects more clearly and that,
hence, the Information gained from combining representations will be greater
than what can be gained from a single representation; [b) multiple representa-
Questions, tasks, or even more complex activities are usuaiiy presented in one
representation, and they may, or may not, require the solver to make a transition
to another representation. For example, students may decide to solve a verbally
posed problem graphically or aigebraicaiiy. (In some classrooms, the use of verbal
reasoning to solve an lgebra problem has not yet received full legitimization.)
176
PROMOTING M U L T I P L E REPRESENTATIONS I N L G E B R A
1
7
2
14
3
21
5
35
4
28
6
42
7
49
8
56
9 ...
63 ...
177
Exploratory questions
amount
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
O
10
15
20
25
waGk#
178
T H E R O L E S OF R E P R E S E N T A T I O N I N S C H O O L
MATHEMATICS
179
Another possible way to raise awareness of the potentiai of various representations is to give a problem situation in one or multiple representations
(possibly collected from students' previous work) and ask students to design
(and solve) a question that in their view can be answered by using the given
representation. I n our activity, for example, we can pose this task and
enclose the tables, graphs, expressions, or verbal descriptions of the savings
of ali four children.
Description of work
The requirement to describe one's work is attached to many questions.
This "habit" is more than routine, and its importance is beyond the need to
document the solution. It allows students to reevaluate their solution strategies and eventually to consider other possibilities. Sometimes we make the
task more specific by attaching to the text of a problem a blank page called
Work Area, with the words Tables, Graphs, Expressions, and Descriptions on
various parts of the page. I n this example, the use of any particular representation is recommended, but optional. At other times, we directly ask students to mention the representation they used on each occasion.
11
77
12
84
13
91
14
98
15
105
She looked at the table and found that the amount Is $105. Motty
clalmed that he had another way. SInce Dina had no savings at the
beginning of the year and her savings Increased by 7 each week,
she would have 7 times the number of weeksthat Is, 7 15 = 105.
Do you think that both methods are correct? Which method do you
preter?
180
PROMOTING M U L T I P L E REPRESENTATIONS I N L G E B R A
T H E R O L E S O F R E P R E S E N T A T I O N I N S C H O O L MATHE-MATICS
The table and the graph below describe the savings of Danny and
Moshon during the year.
Savings
Week#
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Danny's Moshon's
300
295
290
285
280
275
270
265
260
255
250
245
240
235
230
225
220
215
210
205
200
195
190
185
180
175
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
Savings
Week#
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Dannv's
170
165
160
155
150
145
140
135
130
125
120
115
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
Moshon's
160
165
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
181
182
Using the table to answer question 1 seems natural and simple. The following two examples show, however, that the approaches to the solution
were quite varied. Some pairs of students preferred the aigebraic expressions
(first example) or graphs (second example).
After half a year, Moshon had $160. During the first week,
Moshon had $30, and each week he added $5. Therefore we
made the expression 30 + 5x. x Is the number of weeks and In
order to compute [the amount after] half a year, the expression
will he 30 + 5 26 and In order to calculate on a calculator we
need [to keep] the order ot operation. Thus, we found 5 -26 =
130 and added 30 = 160.
We marked the mldpolnt ot the horizontal axis and drew a Une
upwards (untll our Une Intersects Danny's and Moshon's points).
From Danny's and Moshon's points we drew a horizontal Une to
the vertical axIs. We discovered that Danny had $175 hy the
middle ot the year and Moshon had only $150.
P R O M O T I N G M U L T I P L E REPRESENTATIONS I N L G E B R A
183
answers to question 3 (finding cases when the difference between the savings
is $60) illustrate this situation.
We compared the expressions: Moshon 30 + 5 x a n d Danny
300 - Sxand then ... ah ... then we switched to an unsystematIc and sllly search ot each number In the tahle (the resuits- the
21 st, and the 33rd week).
Table 14.1 presents the distribution of the students' choice of representations on each of the first seven questions. Besides the obvious dominance of
the n u m e r i c a l representation, it shouid be noted that some questions
attracted a relatively large proportion of other representations. Thus, about
20 percent of the answers to question 5 (finding when the savings are equal)
were based on graphs, and more than half of the answers to question 7 (finding when the total savings exceed $400) were either verbal or aigebraic.
GONCLtStON
A n analysis of the students' answers to ali seven questions showed that students were remarkably flexible in their use of representations. Only five pairs
of students were consistently numerical. A l i the others used two, three, or
four representations ( 3 1 , 37, and 12 percent, respectively). Sometimes, a pair
used more than one representation to answer a question. Such transfers
between representations usuaiiy occurred when work with the initiaiiy chosen representation seemed too difficult or unrewarding. The following two
'
184
PROMOTING M U L T I P L E REPRESENTATIONS I N L G E B R A
TABLE 14.1
Choice of Representation as a Percent of Total Responses* for Each Question and the
Assessment Task as a Whole
Question
Numerical
Verbal
Graphical
Aigebraic
Unidentifiable
68
16
11
74
13
71
10
51
14
19
16
10
61
24
59
13
13
13
25
41
13
13
Total
60
13
12
times even require m o r e t h a n one representation. To internalize the p r i n c i pie o f m u l t i p l e representations, student reflection o n these actions is aiso
needed and shouid be promoted by the task design.
T h e Savings activity a n d its follow-up task were conducted as regular classr o o m activities a n d were not p l a n n e d a n d c a r r i e d out as research. However,
the analysis o f students' responses supports our c l a i m that suitable p r o b l e m
posing and questioningand systematic encouragement o f students' experimentation w i t h v a r i o u s representationscan increase the awareness of, a n d
the ability to use, various representations i n the solution of a problem.
T h e p r e d o m i n a n t use o f the n u m e r i c a l representation w a s expected. We
relate this preference to the students' early stage i n their l e a r n i n g o f l g e b r a
and to the fact that i n m a n y situations the nature o f a task makes the use o f a
n u m e r i c a l approach mathematically sound.
T h e good news, however, is that i f students are given an appropriate learning e n v i r o n m e n t , they w i l l be able a n d w i l l i n g to e m p l o y a w i d e v a r i e t y o f
solution tools a n d paths. I n our analysis o f students' w o r k , we f o u n d that the
c h o i c e o f a r e p r e s e n t a t i o n c a n be the r e s u l t o f the task's n a t u r e , p e r s o n a l
preference, the p r o b l e m solver's t h i n k i n g style, or attempts to overcome difficuities encountered d u r i n g the use o f another representation. Frequently,
the choice o f representation is i n f l u e n c e d by a c o m b i n a t i o n o f several fact o r s . T o a n s w e r a q u e s t i o n , s t u d e n t s m a y choose a r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o n the
basis o f their analysis o f the p r o b l e m a n d personal preference, a n d they m a y
s w i t c h to another representation at a later stage as a result o f difficuities i n
the solution process.
185
REFERENCES
Ainsworth, Shaaron E . , Peter A. Bibby, and David J. Wood. "Analysing the Costs and
Benefits of Multi-Representational Learning Environments." I n Learning with
Multiple Representations, edited by Maarten W. van Someren, Peter R e i m a n n ,
Henry P. A. Boshuizen, and Ton de Jong, pp. 1 2 0 - 3 4 . Oxford, U . K . : Elsevier Science, 1 9 9 8 .
Heid, M . Kathleen. lgebra in a Technological World. Curriculum and Evaluation
Standards for School Mathematics Adenda Series, Grades 9 - 1 2 . Reston, Va.:
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1 9 9 5 .
Hershkowitz, Rina, and Baruch Schwarz. "Reflective Processes in a Mathematics
Classroom with a R i c h Learning Environment." Cognition and Instruction 1 7
(1999): 65-91.