Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Energy Systems II
Turbomachinery
Part II
Axial
Radial
1.
2.
3.
Multistaging easy
Multistaging difficult
Compressor
1.
Design is simple
Complicated design
2.
3.
No BL separation
BL separation
4.
Efficiency high
Efficiency low
5.
High P & T
Low P & T
6.
7.
Schematic
Work producing machine
High T & P relative to Compressor
Annular expansion!
Flow
Separation?, Diffusion?
Velocity Triangles
1: Inlet to nozzle
2: Inlet to Rotor
3: Exit from rotor
3: Inlet to nozzle
: angle of absolute vel
: angle of relative to vel
ASSUMPTIONS:
Constant axial velocity
Constant u velocity
Courtesy: Turbines, Compressors & Fans Yahya
Velocity Triangles
Work
Work due to expansion of high pressure hot gases
Due to change in momentum
Force, torque on both stator & rotor; Work only by rotor
Energy / wok transfer only by rotor
2.
Flow coefficient ()
3.
Degree of Reaction
Fraction of stage expansion in rotor
Rather than Pressure drop, Useful to express in terms of static
enthalpy (temp.) drop
Defined & expressed in terms of: p, h, T, Flow vel, blade geometry
Several forms of R
Types of Stages
1.
R=0
2.
R = 0.5
3.
R=1
R<0
Multistage Velocity-compounded
Huge pressure drop
Single stage: Very high rotational speed
Two stages : Curtis Stages
Multistage Pressure-compounded
Disadvantages of velocity-compounding
1. C-D nozzle
2. shocks
Multistage Pressure-compounded
Actual adiabatic
Irreversible adiabatic
Courtesy: Turbines, Compressors & Fans Yahya
R =
(h1 h2) = (h2 h3) = (h1 h3)
100% R
Entire change in static properties in Rotor
Work is only due to change in KE in rotor
h1 = h2;
c2 = c3;
2 = 3
R > 100%
Flow is decelerating in Nozzle / fixed blades
h2 > h1;
c2 > c1;
3 > 1
Undesirable
c3 > c2;
2 > 3
Undesirable
Necessary Evil to limit high R at blade tips
Losses
Losses in Impulse stage
Loss Coefficients
Nozzle / Stator
Enthalpy loss coefficient:
N = (h2 h2s) / ( c2^2)
Stagnation Pressure loss coefficient :
YN = (P01 P02) / ( c2^2)
Rotor
Enthalpy loss coefficient:
Efficiencies:
Total-to-Total:
Ratio of
actual shaft work
&
Ideal SW between TOTAL
conditions at entry & exit
Total-to-Static:
Ratio of
actual shaft work
&
Ideal SW between TOTAL
conditions at entry &
STATIC condition at exit
Courtesy: Turbines, Compressors & Fans Yahya
Total-to-Static:
Ratio of
actual shaft work
&
Ideal SW between TOTAL
conditions at entry &
STATIC condition at exit
Courtesy: Turbines, Compressors & Fans Yahya
Effect of Reheat
Expansion 1-2: divide 4 stages
Reheat factor = (ws) / ws
>1
T > st
Thermodynamic effect
No actual heat transfer to stage
Reappearance of stage losses
as increased enthalpy during
constant Pressure heating
Courtesy: Turbines, Compressors & Fans Yahya
Turbine Performance:
External
Courtesy: Turbines, Compressors & Fans Yahya
Salient Features
Critical component
Energy input
Complex problem of design due to high stresses and temp.
knowledge of FM, combustion, Mechanical design, Materials
CFD comes to rescue
Material development -> 1100 K to 1850 K
Fuels: Liquid petroleum distillates, Natural gases
Can Type
Combustion Process
Swirl type combustor
Upstream:
Afterburners
Walking-Stick
Courtesy: Gas Turbine Theory HIH S, H C, GFC R
Compact
Mechanically rugged
Courtesy: Gas Turbine Theory HIH S, H C, GFC R
Turboprop
Turbofan
Ramjet
Courtesy: Web nptel lectures
Centrifugal Compressors
Salient Features
Working fluid: Air (largely), steam, Gas
= f (P, T)
Compressible flow machine: Pressure producing machine
Performance: Euler equation + Equation of state
Mechanical energy is converted to static pressure head
2nd world war: centrifugal compressors
Renewed interest: in conjunction with axial for
turbofan, turboprop
Salient Features
Radically different geometry of flow & passage than Axial
Suitable for: Low specific speed, high P ratio, low mass
Performance wise 3-5% less efficient than axial
Advantages: much higher P ratio (~ 4) per stage,
Simple blade geometry
not affected by small foreign material
Disadvantage: large frontal area
lower efficiency
Multistaging is difficult
Uses: Refrigeration units, petrochemical plants, industrial
small turbo props
Components
3 main components:
Impeller: imparts E
Diffuser: increases P
Stationary
casing
Courtesy: Turbines, Compre`ssors & Fans Yahya
Impeller
Imparts mechanical energy to the fluid
Single
sided
Double
sided
Diffuser
Increases P
Reduces Velocity
@ 50% P increase in I & D
Velocity Triangles
r, , x coordinate system
Angles are measured from tangential direction
Different peripheral velocity at Inlet and Outlet
without IGVs
Work
NO work in diffuser
Energy input / work: only in Impeller
Axial entry at impeller eye: angular mom. zero
Slip Factor: Inertia of air in passage (Stanitzs formula)
Slip factor (): inversely proportional to no. of vanes
Power input factor (): effect of friction, other losses
Compressor efficiency (c): isentropic to actual work
T-S Plot
Diffuser
Combustor needs low velocity gas
Danger of separation: eddy formation, waste of KE, low pressure rise
small divergence angle -> long diffuser -> high skin friction loss
optimum angle ~ 7 to 14 deg.
Compressibility Effects
Shock wave formation -> losses
Usually, Ma ~ 0.8
Impeller inlet Ma = V1 / (r T1)0.5
Reduce V1: use pre-whirl -> IGV
This reduces work capacity
suitably twist IGV, such that pre-whirl is zero at root of eye
Ma at LE of diffuser should be low;
Variation in circumferential static pressure
transmit to impeller -> mechanical failure
avoid resonance: n(I) should not be multiple of n(D)
common practice: n(I) = prime number & n(D) = even number
Why vane-less space between I and D is important?
Courtesy: Gas Turbine Theory HIH S, H C, GFC R
Losses in Compressor
1. Frictional losses:
skin friction & BL separation
f (friction factor, length of flow passage, sq. of flow vel)
Compressor Losses
Non-dimensional numbers
performance depends on several factors
to avoid severe experimentation, dimensional analysis
Some assumptions:
Performance Characteristics
Performance Characteristics
Gas turbine plant should be designed such that compressor will always be
operating on this curve
wise to operate when efficiency is maximum
Courtesy: Gas Turbine Theory HIH S, H C, GFC R
Module 4:
Steam Turbine
Carnot Cycle
Rankine Cycle
Why not Carnot Cycle ?!
Salient Features
Idealized model for steam power plant
exploits phase change: liquid-vapour
Maximizes diff. in sp. Volume during compression & expansion
to increase :
increase avg T of heat addition, lower avg T of rejection
Courtesy: Fundamental of Thermodynamics S, B, Wylen
2. High Boiler P
3. Superheating
Issue: quality of steam
Courtesy: Fundamental of Thermodynamics S, B, Wylen
Reheat
Advantage of superheat
Avoid moisture
avg. T: not much change
little gain in
High T material --> No need of reheat
Regeneration
Rankine & Carnot
Ideal
uses FWH
reversible
regeneration = Carnot ?
Courtesy: Fundamental of Thermodynamics S, B, Wylen
Regeneration: Actual
avg T of heat addition increases
Closed FWH
Open FWH:
better, cost, construction
Regeneration: Reality
Economy driven....
Losses
1. Piping losses:
loss in P and loss in T due to friction
2. Turbine losses:
Frictional effects & heat loss to surrounding
Isentropic efficiency
3. Pump losses:
similar to turbine
4. Condenser losses:
loss of pressure, condensate cooling below sat
usually small
Courtesy: Fundamental of Thermodynamics S, B, Wylen
Regeneration
Rankine & Carnot
Ideal
Actual:
uses FWH
reversible
Impossible
Moisture
regeneration = Carnot ?
Courtesy: www.youtube.com
(for videos)