Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258058235
CITATIONS
READS
67
4 authors:
Sau Har Lee
Indu Jaganath
University of Malaya
8 PUBLICATIONS 49 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Rishya Manikam
University of Malaya
University of Malaya
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer constitutes one of the malignancies with the greatest incidence and mortality rates with
1.6 million new cases and 1.4 million deaths each year. Prognosis remains poor due to deleterious development of
multidrug resistance resulting in less than 15% lung cancer patients reaching five years survival. We have previously
shown that Phyllanthus induced apoptosis in conjunction with its antimetastastic action. In the current study, we
aimed to determine the signaling pathways utilized by Phyllanthus to exert its antimetastatic activities.
Methods: Cancer 10-pathway reporter array was performed to screen the pathways affected by Phyllanthus in lung
carcinoma cell line (A549) to exert its antimetastatic effects. Results from this array were then confirmed with
western blotting, cell cycle analysis, zymography technique, and cell based ELISA assay for human total iNOS.
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was subsequently carried out to study the differential protein expressions in
A549 after treatment with Phyllanthus.
Results: Phyllanthus was observed to cause antimetastatic activities by inhibiting ERK1/2 pathway via suppression of
Raf protein. Inhibition of this pathway resulted in the suppression of MMP2, MMP7, and MMP9 expression to stop
A549 metastasis. Phyllanthus also inhibits hypoxia pathway via inhibition of HIF-1 that led to reduced VEGF and
iNOS expressions. Proteomic analysis revealed a number of proteins downregulated by Phyllanthus that were
involved in metastatic processes, including invasion and mobility proteins (cytoskeletal proteins), transcriptional
proteins (proliferating cell nuclear antigen; zinc finger protein), antiapoptotic protein (Bcl2) and various glycolytic
enzymes. Among the four Phyllanthus species tested, P. urinaria showed the greatest antimetastatic activity.
Conclusions: Phyllanthus inhibits A549 metastasis by suppressing ERK1/2 and hypoxia pathways that led to
suppression of various critical proteins for A549 invasion and migration.
Keywords: Phyllanthus, Metastasis, Apoptosis, ERK1/2, HIF-1
Background
Lung cancer constitutes one of the malignancies with
the greatest incidence and mortality rates with 1.6 million
new cases and 1.4 million deaths each year [1,2]. Although
initial use of platin-based cytotoxic chemotherapy improved
the overall survival rate and life quality of the patients, the
outcome remains poor due to deleterious development of
drug resistance resulting in less than 15% lung cancer
patients surviving for at least five years [2,3]. Approximately
* Correspondence: shamalamy@yahoo.com
1
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Page 2 of 20
[21,22]. Regulation of metastasis by MAPK is mainly via controlling the cells expression of matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs) enzymes by decreasing the nuclear levels of NFB,
c-Fos, or c-Jun [21,22]. The MMPs are a family of at
least 20 members of highly homologous, zinc- and
calcium-dependent endopeptidases which can degrade
virtually all extracellular matrix (ECM) components
[23]. Among these MMPs, MMP2 and MMP9 are
abundantly expressed, secreted, and activated in various
malignant tumors [22,24]. Recent studies also shown that
MMP7 plays an essential role in ectodomain shedding of
cell-surface molecules such as EGFR, HB-EGF, Fas ligand,
and E-cadherin in addition to its ability to degrade ECM
components. Therefore, these enzymes are the most vital
ones implicated in cancer invasion and metastasis [24,25].
Hypoxia pathway is another chief regulator of metastatic
process. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is the determining factor for oxygen-dependent gene regulation and is
a dimer of HIF-1 and HIF-1. Its regulation is mainly
governed by the transactivation and stabilization of HIF-1
protein resided in the cytoplasm [26]. Under normoxia condition, HIF-1 instantaneously interacts with von Hipple
Lindau (pVHL) ubiquitin E3 ligase complex and is targeted
for proteasomal degradation due to hydroxylation of two
specific proline residues within the oxygen-dependent degradation domain by prolyl hydroxylases [7,26]. Contrarily,
HIF-1 will be stabilized with increased expression during
hypoxic condition, allowing it to translocate into the nucleus and dimerize with HIF-1. HIF-1 will subsequently
bind to the hypoxia response elements to regulate transcription of over 100 target genes which favors tumor growth
and metastasis, including vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) as well as genes that regulate cellular processes
such as energy metabolism, cell proliferation, vascular
development and remodelling, as well as vasotone [2,7,26].
In our previous study, Phyllanthus extracts were shown
to inhibit A549 (lung carcinoma) cells growth with IC50
values ranging from 60130 g/ml and 200470 g/ml
for methanolic and aqueous extracts respectively [17]. We
also demonstrated that they effectively reduced invasion,
migration, and adhesion activities of A549 cells in a dosedependent manner and was capable of inducing apoptosis
along with its antimetastastic action [17]. Therefore, the
main objective of this study was to determine the protein
expression profile of Phyllanthus-treated A549 cells and
how the signaling pathways were utilized by Phyllanthus
in order to exert its antiproliferative and antimetastatic
activities on this cell line.
Methods
Plant extracts and standard drugs
Cancer is a group of diseases strongly correlated with defects in signal transduction proteins. Various key signaling
pathways have been implicated in human tumorigenesis.
Analysis of these signaling pathways was performed
using Cignal Finder Cancer 10-pathway Reporter
Array kit (SABiosciences, QIAGEN, USA). Transient
transfection was performed using TransIT-LT1 (Mirus
Bio, USA). Both plasmid DNAs for the respective signaling pathways provided in the kit as well as TransIT-LT1
were diluted using Opti-MEM I reduced serum medium
Table 1 Cytotoxic effect [IC50 (g/ml)] of Phyllanthus
extracts against A549 and MCF-7
IC50 (g/ml) SEM
Cancer cell lines
Plant
extracts
P. niruri (P.n)
P. urinaria (P.u)
P. watsonii (P.w)
P. amarus (P.a)
Solvents
A549
MCF-7
Aqueous
466.7 41.63
179.7 0.58
Methanolic
128.3 17.56
62.3 9.07
Aqueous
215.0 21.79
139.3 1.16
Methanolic
69.0 11.53
48.7 10.02
Aqueous
198.3 10.41
104.0 10.39
Methanolic
61.3 16.17
49.0 8.19
Aqueous
240.0 26.46
156.7 5.77
Methanolic
126.7 7.64
56.3 6.66
Page 3 of 20
Page 4 of 20
Page 5 of 20
proteins were identified in a single spot. The proteins identified were then compared with Uniprot KB/Swiss-Prot
database and grouped according to the Eukaryotic
Orthologous Group of Classifications (COGs).
Data analysis
Results
Determination of signaling pathways affected by
Phyllanthus
Page 6 of 20
Figure 1 Expression level of ten cellular signaling pathways in A549 cells treated with (a) aqueous Phyllanthus extracts and (b)
methanolic Phyllanthus extracts. Error bar indicates the standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. PN P. niruri,
PU P. urinaria, PW P. watsonii, PA P. amarus. *P < 0.05 vs untreated-control.
Page 7 of 20
Figure 2 Percentage of cell cycle phase distribution of A549 cells treated with both aqueous and methanolic Phyllanthus extracts and
standard drugs at their IC50 (g/ml) concentrations for (a) 24 hours, (b) 48 hours, and (c) 72 hours. Error bar indicates the standard error
of the mean of three independent experiments. Aq Aqueous, MeOH - Methanolic, Control Untreated cells. *P < 0.05 vs untreated-control.
Page 8 of 20
Figure 3 Expression level of Pan-Ras, c-Raf, c-Jun/AP-1, Elk-1, c-Myc, HIF-1, Bcl-2, and FUSE-binding proteins in (a) untreated A549 cells
and cells treated with (b) aqueous P. niruri, (c) aqueous P. urinaria, (d) aqueous P. watsonii, (e) aqueous P. amarus, (f) methanolic P. niruri,
(g) methanolic P. urinaria, (h) methanolic P. watsonii, and (i) methanolic P. amarus, (j) Expression level of VEGF in untreated-control and
Phyllanthus-treated A549 cells, (k) Percentage of individual protein expression analysed using Image J software.
Page 9 of 20
Figure 4 Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression level in A549 cells treated with (a and c) aqueous Phyllanthus extracts and
(b and d) methanolic Phyllanthus extracts. M protein marker, C untreated control, L treatment at 200 g/ml and 20 g/ml for aqueous
and methanolic extracts respectively, I treatment at their respective IC50 concentrations, H treatment at 500 g/ml and 50 g/ml for aqueous
and methanolic extracts respectively, PN P. niruri, PU P. urinaria, PW P. watsonii, PA P. amarus.
Figure 6 showed representative 2D-PAGE gels for untreatedcontrol, aqueous P. watsonii-treated, and methanolic
P. watsonii-treated A549 samples. Two-dimensional
gel electrophoresis proteomic analysis picked out 68
and 79 protein spots differentially expressed in aqueous
and methanolic extracts-treated groups respectively.
Subsequent mass spectrometry analysis and database
examination using MASCOT identified 52 protein spots
significantly downregulated by aqueous Phyllanthus
extracts as listed in Table 2. These protein spots were
further categorized according to Clusters of Orthologous
Groups (COGs) classification and majority of them fell into
the category of post-translational modification, protein
turnover, and chaperones, followed by intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport, cytoskeleton, as well
as energy production and conversion (Figure 7A). On the
other hand, methanolic Phyllanthus extracts significantly
suppressed 64 proteins as tabulated in Table 3. Most of
these proteins fell into the category of signal transduction
mechanisms, transcription, defense mechanisms, amino
acid transport and metabolism, as well as secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism (Figure 7B).
The negative (-) symbol in both Tables 2 and 3 signified
suppression of the proteins and a value of 1.00 indicates the
complete absence of this protein in the Phyllanthus-treated
sample as compared to the untreated-control sample and
the degree of suppression reduces as the value increases.
Discussion
Numerous reports describe poor therapeutic efficacy
and prognostic survival for lung malignancy which is
Page 10 of 20
Figure 5 Expression level of (a) iNOS and (b) VEGF in untreated and Phyllanthus-treated A549 cells. APN - aqueous P. niruri, APU - aqueous
P. urinaria, APW - aqueous P. watsonii, APA - aqueous P. amarus, MPN - methanolic P. niruri, MPU - methanolic P. urinaria, MPW - methanolic P. watsonii,
MPA - methanolic P. amarus, CIS Cisplatin, DOX Doxorubicin. Error bar indicates the standard error of the mean of three independent experiments.
P < 0.05 for all extracts-treated A549 compared to untreated-control A549.
Page 11 of 20
Figure 6 Representative 2D-PAGE gels for (a and b) untreated-control A549 and its aqueous P. watsonii-treated A549, as well as
(c and d) untreated-control A549 and its methanolic P. watsonii-treated A549.
Spot ID
Possible proteins
Fold change
UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT
Acc. Number
Database
0.84
P60709
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
APN
APU
APW
APA
0.88
0.95
Actin, cytoplasmic 1
0.81
Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase
0.50
N/A
0.28
0.10
P40261
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Alpha-Enolase
0.62
0.57
0.48
0.58
P06733
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
1.00
0.20
N/A
1.00
P49720
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Retinal dehydrogenase 1
0.23
N/A
0.13
N/A
P00352
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Galectin-1
1.00
0.13
0.57
0.38
P09382
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.12
0.22
0.32
0.10
P04792
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
0.30
0.93
0.99
0.91
P04406
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.32
0.39
0.27
0.80
P63241
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
10
0.46
0.82
0.90
0.75
P10809
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
11
N/A
0.45
N/A
0.22
P78417
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
12
0.19
0.18
N/A
1.00
Q06323
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
13
Annexin A4
0.29
0.29
0.21
0.65
P09525
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
14
Vimentin
0.91
0.82
0.24
0.79
P08670
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
15
0.13
0.36
1.00
0.42
P62937
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
16
1.00
1.00
0.32
N/A
P62937
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
17
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.71
P04406
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
18
0.37
0.19
0.20
N/A
P21796
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
19
0.80
0.37
N/A
0.80
Q9NY65
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
20
0.51
0.54
0.66
0.88
Q8N5W8
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
21
0.41
N/A
0.38
0.75
P05013
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
22
1.00
1.00
0.93
0.79
O94762
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
23
Sorting nexin-3
0.25
1.00
1.00
1.00
O60493
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
24
0.36
0.16
0.32
0.41
O95377
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
25
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.38
P39019
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.19
0.22
N/A
N/A
P38646
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
O15511
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
28
Sorting nexin-3
0.36
0.35
0.37
1.00
O60493
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
29
0.19
N/A
0.41
1.00
P17927
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
30
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P62847
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
31
Corticotropin-lipotropin precursor
0.73
0.88
1.00
1.00
P01189
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
32
1.00
0.67
1.00
1.00
Q9BY32
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Page 12 of 20
26
27
Table 2 Identified proteins of A549 downregulated (-) in the presence of aqueous Phyllanthus extracts
Peroxiredoxin-1
0.08
0.56
1.00
0.33
Q06830
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
34
Protein memo
0.95
0.88
0.56
0.47
Q9Y316
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
35
1.00
0.31
0.46
0.21
P45880
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
36
0.28
0.19
0.27
N/A
P30048
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
37
RuvB-like 2
0.24
N/A
0.43
0.11
Q9Y230
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
38
0.36
0.17
0.37
0.29
Q5JST6
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
39
0.89
N/A
0.20
0.97
P48643
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
40
Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1
0.54
0.62
0.44
0.21
P31948
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
41
Retinal dehydrogenase 1
0.33
0.79
0.58
0.61
P00352
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
42
Prostaglandin E synthase 3
0.26
0.36
0.97
0.16
Q15185
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
43
Trypsin-1 precursor
0.37
1.00
0.28
0.35
P07477
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
33
44
Serpin B9
0.51
0.14
0.21
0.51
P50453
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
45
N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase
0.64
0.57
0.50
0.28
Q8NFW8
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
46
Cofilin-1
0.76
N/A
0.85
0.38
P23528
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
47
ADP-ribosylation factor 1
1.00
0.21
0.15
1.00
P84077
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
48
Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P04075
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
49
Sorting nexin-3
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
O60493
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
50
Phosphoglycerate mutase 1
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P18669
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
51
Triosephosphate isomerase
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P60174
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
52
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P63241
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Table 2 Identified proteins of A549 downregulated (-) in the presence of aqueous Phyllanthus extracts (Continued)
The negative (-) symbol signified suppression of the proteins and a value of 1.00 indicates the complete absence of this protein in the aqueous Phyllanthus-treated sample as compared to the untreated-control sample and
the degree of suppression reduces as the value increases. APN Aqueous P. niruri, APU Aqueous P. urinaria, APW Aqueous P. watsonii, APA Aqueous P. amarus, N/A Not Affected.
Page 13 of 20
Page 14 of 20
Figure 7 Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) classification of identified proteins in A549 cells treated with (a) aqueous Phyllanthus
extracts and (b) methanolic Phyllanthus extracts.
Spot ID
Possible proteins
Fold change
UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT
Acc. Number
Database
P05109
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.50
Q53FP2
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.73
Q9Y3D8
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
1.00
1.00
Q06830
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.23
0.39
P81277
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.96
1.00
0.75
Q7RTT6
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.79
1.00
0.51
P48637
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.61
0.63
0.98
0.94
Q3MHX9
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
N/A
N/A
0.47
0.36
Q8ND25
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.46
0.59
0.43
0.93
Q9VEA5
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Q9NQ50
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
12
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Q15697
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
13
0.21
0.15
1.00
N/A
Q6PRD1
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
14
Histatin-1 precursor
0.24
0.66
0.78
0.27
P15515
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
15
0.33
0.57
0.19
0.54
Q9Y4Y9
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
16
Bcl-2-like protein 11
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.70
O43521
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
17
Contactin-2 precursor
0.29
0.60
0.42
0.39
Q02246
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
MPN
MPU
MPW
MPA
Protein S100-A8
0.47
0.10
0.48
0.55
Transmembrane protein 35
0.82
0.78
1.00
0.32
0.62
0.81
Peroxiredoxin-1
0.78
1.00
0.59
0.29
0.46
Glutathione synthetase
0.38
10
11
Bis(5-adenosyl)-triphosphatase
1.00
1.00
N/A
1.00
P49789
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Trypsin-1 precursor
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
P07477
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
20
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P12004
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
21
Endoplasmin precursor
N/A
1.00
1.00
0.37
P14625
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
22
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Q9UBQ5
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
23
Serine/threonine-protein kinase 6
1.00
0.96
0.19
1.00
O14965
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
24
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Q9NSD9
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
25
0.78
0.49
0.20
0.88
P59665
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
26
0.58
N/A
0.34
0.55
P56703
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
27
1.00
N/A
0.97
0.80
Q8N4Z0
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
28
0.19
0.36
N/A
0.36
Q6IAA8
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
29
0.31
0.25
1.00
0.87
P59665
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
30
0.33
0.67
0.67
N/A
P42127
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
31
0.42
0.48
0.48
0.45
Q9VEA5
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
32
0.21
N/A
0.62
0.61
Q8IZN7
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
Page 15 of 20
18
19
Table 3 Identified proteins of A549 downregulated (-) in the presence of methanolic Phyllanthus extracts
0.58
0.59
0.56
0.79
Q15369
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
34
Metallothionein-1M
0.55
0.52
0.48
0.48
Q8N339
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
35
0.60
0.66
0.59
0.61
P01112
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
36
Neuromedin-B precursor
0.24
0.32
0.23
0.34
P08949
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
37
Protein-tyrosine sulfotransferase 2
0.36
N/A
N/A
0.33
O60704
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
38
0.23
0.23
0.13
0.37
P02652
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
39
0.58
0.52
1.00
0.29
Q9H0F7
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
40
Alpha-enolase
0.27
0.51
N/A
0.56
P06733
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
41
1.00
1.00
0.44
0.71
P62140
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
42
N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Q8NFW8
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
43
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Q9BY32
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
44
Alkyldihydroxyacetonephosphate synthase
1.00
0.55
1.00
1.00
O00116
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
45
1.00
0.57
1.00
1.00
P67812
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
46
0.89
0.75
0.67
0.21
O75896
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
47
Metallothionein-2
0.71
0.17
0.14
0.53
P02795
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
48
0.57
0.48
0.39
0.48
P58499
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
49
Metallothionein-1H
0.52
0.48
N/A
0.29
P80294
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
50
Metallothionein-2
0.34
0.59
0.49
1.00
P02795
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
51
Protein BEX5
0.48
0.33
0.30
0.48
Q5H9J7
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
52
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Q9VEA5
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
53
0.93
0.24
1.00
0.14
P12074
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
33
54
N/A
0.94
1.00
0.30
MASCOT;COGS
55
0.15
0.28
0.35
0.27
P21796
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.47
0.13
1.32
N/A
P21796
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
0.64
0.76
0.43
0.32
P62136
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
58
0.95
1.00
0.17
1.00
Q9BWD1
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
59
Glutathione synthetase
0.50
0.45
0.38
0.61
P48637
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
60
Actin-related protein 10
0.94
0.70
0.13
0.73
Q9NZ32
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
61
Enteropeptidase precursor
0.63
0.19
1.00
0.70
P98073
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
62
Metallothionein-1L
0.86
0.79
0.96
0.44
Q93083
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
63
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P63218
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
64
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
O95715
MASCOT;UNIPROT KB/SWISS-PROT;COGS
The negative (-) symbol signified suppression of the proteins and a value of 1.00 indicates the complete absence of this protein in the methanolic Phyllanthus-treated sample as compared to the untreated-control
sample and the degree of suppression reduces as the value increases. MPN Methanolic P. niruri, MPU Methanolic P. urinaria, MPW Methanolic P. watsonii, MPA Methanolic P. amarus, N/A Not Affected.
Page 16 of 20
56
57
Table 3 Identified proteins of A549 downregulated (-) in the presence of methanolic Phyllanthus extracts (Continued)
Page 17 of 20
Conclusions
All the findings obtained in this study point to the involvement of ERK1/2 and hypoxia pathways which were
Page 18 of 20
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Page 19 of 20
23. Chen YY, Chou PY, Chien YC, Wu CH, Wu TS, Sheu MJ: Ethanol extracts of
fruiting bodies of Antrodia cinnamomea exhibit anti-migration action in
human adenocarcinoma CL1-0 cells through the MAPK and PI3K/AKT
signaling pathways. Phytomedicine 2012, 19(89):768778.
24. Hsiao YC, Kuo WH, Chen PN, Chang HR, Lin TH, Yang WE, Hsieh YS, Chu SC:
Flavanone and 2-OH flavanone inhibit metastasis of lung cancer cells
via down-regulation of proteinases activities and MAPK pathway.
Chem-Biol Interact 2007, 167(3):193206.
25. Liu D, Nakano J, Ishikawa S, Yokomise H, Ueno M, Kadota K, Urushihara M,
Huang CL: Overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7)
correlates with tumor proliferation, and a poor prognosis in non-small
cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2007, 58(3):384391.
26. Hanze J, Eul BG, Savai R, Krick S, Goyal P, Grimminger F, Seeger W, Rose F: RNA
interference for HIF-1alpha inhibits its downstream signalling and affects
cellular proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003, 312(3):571577.
27. Teijido O, Dejean L: Upregulation of Bcl2 inhibits apoptosis-driven BAX
insertion but favors BAX relocalization in mitochondria. FEBS Lett 2010,
584(15):33053310.
28. Weber A, Kristiansen I, Johannsen M, Oelrich B, Scholmann K, Gunia S, May
M, Meyer HA, Behnke S, Moch H, et al: The FUSE binding proteins FBP1
and FBP3 are potential c-myc regulators in renal, but not in prostate
and bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2008, 8:369.
29. Xu K, Liang X, Gao F, Zhong J, Liu J: Antimetastatic effect of ganoderic
acid T in vitro through inhibition of cancer cell invasion. Process Biochem
2010, 45(8):12611267.
30. Cullis ER, Kalber TL, Ashton SE, Cartwright JE, Griffiths JR, Ryan AJ, Robinson
SP: Tumour overexpression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)
increases angiogenesis and may modulate the anti-tumour effects of the
vascular disrupting agent ZD6126. Microvasc Res 2006, 71(2):7684.
31. Nalivaeva NN, Turner AJ: Post-translational modifications of proteins:
acetylcholinesterase as a model system. Proteomics 2001, 1(6):735747.
32. Walsh G, Jefferis R: Post-translational modifications in the context of
therapeutic proteins. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24(10):12411252.
33. Ruvinsky I, Meyuhas O: Ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation: from
protein synthesis to cell size. Trends Biochem Sci 2006, 31(6):342348.
34. Martineau Y, Derry MC, Wang X, Yanagiya A, Berlanga JJ, Shyu AB, Imataka
H, Gehring K, Sonenberg N: Poly(A)-binding protein-interacting protein 1
binds to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 to stimulate translation.
Mol Cell Biol 2008, 28(21):66586667.
35. Khalil AA, Kabapy NF, Deraz SF, Smith C: Heat shock proteins in oncology:
Diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets? Biochim Biophys Acta 2011,
1816(2):89104.
36. Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Harper JR, Duguay AR, Pinkner JS, Bann J, Frieden C,
Silhavy TJ, Hultgren SJ: Periplasmic peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerases
are not essential for viability, but SurA is required for pilus biogenesis in
Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2005, 187(22):76807686.
37. Yoo BC, Fountoulakis M, Dierssen M, Lubec G: Expression patterns of
chaperone proteins in cerebral cortex of the fetus with Down syndrome:
dysregulation of T-complex protein 1. J Neural Transm Suppl 2001,
61:321334.
38. Walsh N, ODonovan N, Kennedy S, Henry M, Meleady P, Clynes M, Dowling
P: Identification of pancreatic cancer invasion-related proteins by
proteomic analysis. Proteome Sci 2009, 7:3.
39. Li S, Shang Y: Regulation of SRC family coactivators by post-translational
modifications. Cell Signal 2007, 19(6):11011112.
40. Crow T, Xue-Bian JJ: Proteomic analysis of post-translational
modifications in conditioned Hermissenda. Neuroscience 2010,
165(4):11821190.
41. Tuteja N: Signaling through G protein coupled receptors. Plant Signal
Behav 2009, 4(10):942.
42. Cross TG, Scheel-Toellner D, Henriquez NV, Deacon E, Salmon M, Lord JM:
Serine/threonine protein kinases and apoptosis. Exp Cell Res 2000,
256(1):3441.
43. Nishida E, Gotoh Y: The MAP kinase cascade is essential for diverse signal
transduction pathways. Trends Biochem Sci 1993, 18(4):128.
44. Hindley A, Kolch W: Extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen
activated protein kinase (MAPK)-independent functions of Raf kinases.
J Cell Sci 2002, 115(Pt 8):15751581.
45. Roberts PJ, Der CJ: Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein
kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer. Oncogene 2007,
26(22):32913310.
Page 20 of 20