Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Analysed building :
Total cost of building
GFA
650 m2
Tender date
2008
Based index
243
GFA
750 m2
Tender date
2011
Current index
251
External works
Preliminaries
Contingencies
5%
Proposed building :
RM 70,000.00
RM 30,000.00
Fire protection
RM 15,000.00
RM 50,000.00
Total cost
GFA
552,500.00
650
= RM 850.00
Proposedindex
x cost/m2
GFA
251
x 850.00
243
New cost/m2
= RM 877.98
658,485.00
165,000.00
823,485.00
123,522.75
947,007.75
D Preliminaries @ 3% (of A + B + C)
28,410.23
975,417.98
E Contingencies @ 5% (of A + B + C + D)
Total construction cost
Cost/m2 of GFA =
1,024,188.88
750
48,770.90
1,024,188.88
1,365.59
B. The following table shows the Tender Price Index for government project
from 2004 to 2007. Use this index to estimate :
i.
ii. A block of school administrative building with total gross floor area of
1,500m2 to be constructed in the first half of 2007. The average cost/m2 of a
similar building constructed in the first half of 2005 was RM 750.00.
1/2004
243.69
2/2004
288.59
1/2005
312.09
2/2005
312.56
1/2006
393.64
2/2006
412.62
1/2007
415.44
Source : Kos Purata Semeter Persegi Kerja-Kerja Pembinaan Bangunan, 2007, JKR
Current index
x Analysed cost
Based index
412.62
x RM 60,000.00
243.69
= RM 101,593.00
Total cost
% Price change =
=
= 69.32%
Current index
x Analysed cost
Based index
415.44
x RM 750.00
312.09
= RM 998.37
Total cost
% Price change =
=
= 33.12%
C. Calculate the new total cost target for element internal wall and partition of
a proposed building to be constructed at the end of year 2012 using the
following information :
Analysed building :
GFA
= 125 m2
= 35 m2
Year completed
= 2005
Material costs :
Half brick wall
= RM 28.00/m2
= RM 7.50/m2
= RM 6.50/m2
4
Proposed building :
GFA
= 145 m2
= 45 m2
Cost/m2 (EUR) :
Half brick wall
= 28.00
= 15.00
= 13.00
Total EUR
56.00
Price Adjustment
EUR
= 56.00
= 5.60
New EUR
61.60
Quality Adjustment
EUR
= 61.60
5% Quality increase
= 3.08
New EUR
64.68
Quantity Adjustment
Total cost of element
= EUQ x EUR
= 45 x 64.68
= RM 2,910.60
Cost/m2 GFA
2,910.60
145
= RM 20.07
5
Conclusion
Analysed Building
Proposed Building
EUQ
35 m2
45 m2
EUR
RM56.00
RM 64.68
GFA
125 m2
145 m2
35 x 56.00 = RM 1,960.00
45 x 64.68 = RM 2,910.60
1,960.00
= RM 15.68
125
2,910.60
= RM 20.07
145
20.07 15.68
x 100%
15.68
% Difference
D. Calculate the new total cost target for element internal wall finishes of the
following building.
Analysed Building
Proposed Building
EUQ
350 m2
359 m2
EUR
RM 45.45
RM 56.81
GFA
415 m2
450 m2
Index
182
175
Change of cost/m2 of wall finishes from
RM 7.50 to RM 9.75.
Price Adjustment
New EUR
Proposed Index
x EUR (Analysed)
Analysed Index
175
x 45.45
182
= RM 43.70
Quality Adjustment
Change of wall finishes from RM 7.50/m2 to RM 9.75/m2
% Change of quality =
9.75 7.50
x 100%
7.50
= 30%
= 43.70
Quantity Adjustment
Total cost of element = EUQ x EUR
= 359 x 56.81
= RM 20,394.79
Cost/m2 GFA
20,394.79
450
= RM 45.32
Conclusion
Analysed Building
Proposed Building
EUQ
350 m2
359 m2
EUR
RM 45.45
RM 56.81
GFA
415 m2
450 m2
15,907.50
= RM 38.33
415
20,394.79
= RM 45.32
450
45.32 38.33
x 100%
38.33
E. The table below shows the summary of the cost analysis of a double-storey
office building in Shah Alam, Selangor which was completed in year 2010.
You are required to prepare a new cost plan of the elements shown in the table
for a similar building to be built in Klang, Selangor at the end of 2012.
Date : 2010
Total Cost of Element
Cost/m2 GFA
(RM)
(RM)
SUBSTRUCTURE
1A
Piling
1B
65,589.30
145.75
65,589.30
145.75
SUPERSTRUCTURE
2A
Frame
2B
Upper floor
2C
Roof
100.69
2D
Stairs
16.87
2E
External walls
19.46
2F
Windows
55.51
2G
28.13
2H
Doors
24.44
100.75
36.84
172,215.49
382.70
FINISHES
55,234.56
122.74
45,000.00
100.00
EXTERNAL WORKS
60,275.42
133.95
PRELIMINARIES
25,832.32
57.41
424,147.10
942.55
TOTAL
Example of calculation :
Figures in the table need to be adjusted to accommodate changes in time (price),
quality and quantity. On the next page are examples of the methods of adjustment for
two elements. All elements involve the adjustment on time and quantity except for
element Finishes (time, quality and quantity).
i.
Proposed Index
x Cost/m2 (Analysed)
Analysed Index
245
x 145.75
185
= RM 193.03
Total cost of element = GFA x New Cost/m2
= 515 x 193.03
= RM 99,408.17
ii. Finishes
New Cost/m2
Proposed Index
x Cost/m2 (Analysed)
Analysed Index
245
x 122.74
185
= RM 162.55
New Cost/m2
= 162.55
= 16.26
New Cost/m2
178.81
Date : 2012
Total Cost of Element
Cost/m2 GFA
(RM)
(RM)
SUBSTRUCTURE
1A
Piling
1B
99,408.17
193.03
99,408.17
193.03
SUPERSTRUCTURE
2A
Frame
2B
Upper floor
2C
Roof
133.35
2D
Stairs
22.34
2E
External walls
25.77
2F
Windows
73.52
2G
37.25
2H
Doors
32.37
133.43
48.79
261,012.49
506.82
FINISHES
178.81
132.43
EXTERNAL WORKS
177.39
PRELIMINARIES
TOTAL
76.02
651,215.40
1,264.50
10
Element
Total cost
Cost/m2 GFA
EUQ
EUR
(RM)
(RM)
(m2)
(RM)
WBLFF
15,000.00
50.00
300
50.00
Frame
14,000.00
46.67
300
50.00
Roof
13,500.00
45.00
310
43.55
External walls
10,350.00
34.50
240
43.13
600.00
2.00
150.00
Doors
Prepare a new cost analysis for a proposed guardhouse based on the drawing and
information provided in the above analysis.
Cost data :
i.
vi. Roof - change to better specification of roof covering costing 15% more
vii. Door - similar to analysed building
Floor to ceiling height, 3.50 m
PLAN
25 m
FRONT ELEVATION
11
Element : WBLFF
i.
RM
Current index
x EUR
Analysed index
230
x 50.00
185
ii.
Quality adjustment
No adjustment
iii.
25 x 15
iv.
62.16 x 375 m2
v.
Cost/m2 GFA =
62.16
375 m2
23,310.00
23,310.00
375
62.16
Element : FRAME
RM
i.
ii.
Quality adjustment
iii.
25 x 15
iv.
85.00 x 375 m2
v.
Cost/m2 GFA =
375 m2
31,875.00
31,875.00
375
85.00
Element : ROOF
i.
ii.
85.00
RM
Current index
x EUR
Analysed index
Quality adjustment
230
x 43.55
185
54.14
Increase 15%
62.26
Length
375 m2
25.00
Add
wall 2/0.115
oh 2/0.60
1.43
26.43
12
Width
15.00
Add
wall 2/0.115
eaves 2/0.60
1.43
16.43
26.43 x 16.43
= 434.24
iv.
v.
62.26 x 434 m2
27,020.84
27,020.84
375
72.06
ii.
Current index
x EUR
Analysed index
Quality adjustment
RM
230
x 43.13
185
53.62
Decrease 10%
48.26
277 m2
Length
25.00
Add
wall 2/0.115
0.23
25.23
Width
15.00
Add
wall 2/0.115
0.23
15.23
13
Total area
(25.23 + 15.23)2 x 3.50
= 283.22
Ddt
Door 0.90 x 2.10
1.89
4.32
277.01
iv
.
v.
Cost/m2 GFA =
48.26 x 277 m2
13,368.02
375
Element : DOORS
i.
Current index
x EUR
Analysed index
230
x 150.00
185
Quality adjustment
No adjustment
iii.
iv.
186.49 x 2 m2
Cost/m2 GFA =
35.65
RM
ii.
v.
13,368.02
372.98
375
186.49
2 m2
372.98
0.99
14
Total cost
Cost/m2 GFA
EUQ
EUR
(RM)
(RM)
(m2)
(RM)
WBLFF
23,310.00
62.16
375
62.16
Frame
31,875.00
85.00
375
85.00
Roof
27,020.84
72.06
434
62.26
External walls
13,368.02
35.65
277
48.26
372.98
0.99
186.49
Doors
G. The table below shows the building elements abstracted from an Elemental
Cost Analysis (ECA) of an eight-storey office building in the state of Pahang,
tendered in 2010. The quantity surveyor had used the ECA as the main
source of reference to prepare a cost plan for a proposed six-storey office
building in Negeri Sembilan scheduled to be tendered out in the year 2012.
Element
Cost of
Element
Cost of
Element/m2 GFA
Element Unit
Quantity
Element Unit
Rate
(RM)
(RM)
(m2)
(RM)
WBLFF
170,400.00
71.00
500
340.80
Frame
408,000.00
170.00
2,400
170.00
Roof
135,600.00
56.50
520
260.77
External Walls
220,200.00
91.75
6,300
34.95
Internal Walls
135,141.00
56.31
4,000
33.79
Windows
42,000.00
17.50
300
140.00
45,000.00
18.75
1,800
25.00
50,000.00
20.83
Internal
Finishes
Floor
M & E services
Calculate the new elemental cost targets to be inserted in the cost plan based on the
information given below :
i.
The tender price index for the proposed building is 312.50, the location index is
1.0918 compared with the analysed building which are 291.15 and 1.0477
respectively.
15
ii. There is a decrease in the storey height of the proposed building from 3.50m to
3.20m compared with the analysed building.
iii. Changes in the roof design for the proposed building from flat roof to pitch roof
by using steel structure. The following are the composite rates involved :
a) Roof structure
: RM 350.00/m2
b) Roof finishes
c) Roof drainage
iv. Shortage of clay bricks necessitates the use of cement and sand bricks. The
current cost of cement and sand brick wall is RM 70.00/m2.
v.
Mild steel frame for windows is anticipated instead of anodised aluminum frame
that was used in the cost analysis. A saving of 15% is expected from the changes.
vi. Improved specification for internal floor finishes as two (2) floors are to be
occupied by the owner. The analysed building used cement render and ceramic
tiles for wet area.
a) The improvements for the two (2) floors are as follows :
Allow carpet - 40% (for managing directors room and meeting room)
Ceramic tiles for other areas (including wet area)
b) The remaining floors used cement render.
c) Given current costs :
Carpet
: RM 210.00/m2
Ceramic Tiles
: RM 80.00/m2
i.
16
(6 x 3.20m) - (8 x 3.50m)
x 100%
(8 x 3.50m)
= - 31.42%
= Assume, 30% (any figure less than 31% is acceptable).
Element : WBLFF
1
312.50
x 340.80
291.15
365.79
Location index adjustment
Current location index
x EUR
Analysed location index
1.0918
x 365.79
1.0477
381.19
Less loading adjustment
381.19 x -30%
266.83
114.36
Quality adjustment
None
500 m2
266.83 x 500
133,415.00
1,800
133,415.00
74.12
17
Element : FRAME
1
312.50
x 170.00
291.15
182.47
Location index adjustment
Current location index
x EUR
Analysed location index
1.0918
x 182.47
1.0477
190.15
Less loading adjustment
190.15 x -30%
133.10
57.04
Quality adjustment
None
1,800 m2
133.10 x 1,800
239,584.57
239,584.57
1,800
133.10
Element : ROOF
1
350.00
- Roof finishes
70.00
420.00
None
None
Quality adjustment
15% x 420.00
420.00
63.00
483.00
18
483.00 x 520
251,160.00
251,160.00
1,800
139.53
Quality adjustment
70.00
None
None
70.00
None
3,240 m2
70.00 x 3,240
226,800.00
226,800.00
1,800
126.00
Quality adjustment
70.00
None
None
70.00
None
2,057 m2
70.00 x 2,057
143,990.00
19
79.99
Element : WINDOWS
1
312.50
x 140.00
291.15
150.27
Location index adjustment
Current location index
x EUR
Analysed location index
1.0918
x 150.27
1.0477
156.59
Less loading adjustment
None
Quality adjustment
15% x 156.59
23.49
156.59
133.10
133.10 x 154
20,497.40
20,497.40
1,800
11.39
Carpet
40% x 210.00
84.00
20
10.00
2/6 x 132.00
44.00
4/6 x 10.00
6.67
50.67
None
None
Quality adjustment
None
Combined in EUR
3
50.67
50.67
1,013 m2
50.67 x 1,013
51,328.71
1,800
51,328.71
28.52
None
Quality adjustment
None
None
New cost
85,000.00
1,800
85,000.00
47.22
21
Cost of
Element
Cost of
Element/m2 GFA
Element Unit
Quantity
Element Unit
Rate
(RM)
(RM)
(m2)
(RM)
WBLFF
133,415.00
74.12
500
266.83
Frame
239,584.57
133.10
1,800
133.10
Roof
251,160.00
139.53
520
483.00
External walls
226,800.00
126.00
3,240
70.00
Internal walls
143,990.00
79.99
2,057
70.00
Windows
20,497.40
11.39
154
133.10
Internal Floor
Finishes
51,328.71
28.52
1,013
50.67
M
&
Services
85,000.00
47.22
Carpet
210.00
Ceramic
80.00
Cement
10.00
None
None
Quality adjustment
None
22
338 m2
40% x 338m2
135
Cement 675 m2
4
28,350.00
Cement
203 x 80.00
16,200.00
675 x 10.00
6,750.00
51,300.00
51,300.00
1,800
28.50
23
H. How would the change in the number of storeys affect the construction cost
of two building with similar gross floor area? Explain factors that might be
affected due to these changes.
Building K
Building F
10.00
10.00
20.00
20.00
Plan
Plan
3.00 m
Section
3.00 m
Section
If two building have the same GFA and specifications but vary in the number of
storeys, and if the specifications are similar, then the construction cost is generally
higher for the higher building.
Refer to the following calculation :
Building K
Building F
3.00
3.00
GFA (m2)
(20 + 20) x 2 = 80
(10 + 10) x 2 = 40
(80 x 3) x 2 = 480
(40 x 3) x 8 = 960
No. of storeys
Storey height (m)
24
a.
b.
Foundation for F may likely be deeper and a more expensive type due to load
being spread over a smaller area;
c.
Upper floors are generally more expensive than ground floor not only because of
the hoisting but also because of the need for formwork and additional
reinforcement. In K half the total area is upper floor while in F it is seven to eight
floors;
d.
e.
f.
Lifts will be required in F. Vertical transportation will reduce the usable floor
area;
g.
Internal layout will affect the cost of partitions, but they are likely to be greater in
K. It is seldom, however, that the increased cost of partitions will offset the large
difference in external wall cost;
h.
Other elements - doors, windows and services are likely to be affected by the
difference in total height; and
i.
Roof - though the roof in F is only 25% of K, it is unlikely that the saving on this
will completely offset the extra cost of the upper floors, as roofs are generally of
lighter construction.
25