Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
119
120
8.1 Background
121
Rainfall
Water use
122
Underground water
North
South
1000
200
900
1300
1900
44.7
Surface water
Total
300
150
200
200
1500
150
1100
1300
200
35.3
3.5
25.9
30.6
4
850
20.0
4250
1500
35.3
100
Note: 1 hm3/year is equivalent to 1,000,000 m3/year. AEP = drinking water supply (lalimentation en eau potable).
users of water;
Safeguarding public health and the
protection of water resources and
aquatic environments against the
risks of pollution by the collection and
purification of domestic and industrial
used water as well as rainwater and runoff water in urban zones;
The valorization of non-conventional
water of all kinds to increase water
supply possibilities.
Agricultural water
The tariffs for agricultural water use are
established according to a binomial formula
based on the maximum subscribed flow and
the actual consumed volume. The water
tariff rates applied in different regions are
presented in Table 8.2.
Volumetric
m3
Fixed
l/s/ha
Sig
1.20 DA
250 DA
Habra
1.20 DA
250 DA
Mined
1.00 DA
250 DA
Low Chlif
1.00 DA
250 DA
Chlif medium
1.15 DA
250 DA
High Chlif
1.25 DA
400 DA
Western Mitidja
1.00 DA
400 DA
Hamiz
1.25 DA
400 DA
Saf Saf
1.00 DA
400 DA
Bou Namoussa
1.20 DA
400 DA
Irrigated Perimeters
Water services
The use, management and sustainable
development of water resources aim to
ensure a regular supply. The objectives are:
Providing a water supply by mobilizing
and distributing water in sufficient
quantity and of the required quality, to
satisfy the needs of the population and
the watering of livestock and to meet
the demands of agriculture, industry and
other economic activities and social
123
8.2.1 Introduction
124
Ecological impact
Negligible impact on the physicochemical qualities of soils;
Site location
18 km from
Constantine
4 km from Souk Ahras
Effective flow in
m3/day
16,000
13,000
Wadi El Athmania
2,700
7,000
1.8 km
2,000
Periphery of
Touggourt
10,000
Ain Sfiha
12,000
15,000
Boumerdes
2 km from city
5,000
Thenia
2 km from city
3,000
Maghnia
Ain El Hadjar
Touggourt
Stif
Tizi Ouzou
125
Proximity to
arable land
moderately
close
close
moderately
close
moderately
close
moderately
close
near palmerais
surrounded by
arable land
surrounded by
arable land
surrounded by
arable land
surrounded by
arable land
Socioeconomic impact
The area is characterized by a lack
of knowledge of the potential of
natural resources, the existence of
extensive production systems with a
high percentage of fallow, very strong
disparities in livestock numbers, significant
inadequacies in farm management,
and a low level of diffusion of innovative
technologies;
Low level of technical performance,
and very strong sensitivity of outputs to
climatic risks, reflecting a low level of
technical control;
Low level of agricultural incomes, in
particular of very small-scale farming
and collective farms that do not have
livestock;
Some technical and economic
progress in performance, though not
very significant, due to the National
Program on Agricultural Development
(PNDA), which has had net impacts
(diversification of farming systems,
irrigation, equipment);
Quantity of mobilizable wastewater is
only enough to irrigate a limited area: 40
to 50 ha, by supplemental irrigation;
Lack of precise knowledge of the area
currently irrigated with used water, and
this in spite of prohibition of the use of this
resource; Consequently,
Gender
Report on the situation of women who
are prevented taking initiatives to access
external resources information, credit,
subsidies and other State aid, employment
opportunities;
Women contribute significantly to the
productive activities of the household
(livestock production);
Very strong degradation of the knowhow of women (craft industries, in
particular working with wool);
High recognition of the situation of
women and young people who
are confronted by unemployment
and difficulties of acceding to high
responsibility in various State action
programs.
Reuse of wastewater for supplemental
irrigation project background and design
Issues
Over the last 25 years, Algeria has
experienced a period of intense and
persistent drought, characterized by a
significant rainfall deficit of 30% over the
whole country (during the year 2001/2002,
this deficit was 50%).
The Algerian climate is characterized by its
aridity; so the majority of the arable land is
located where water is frequently scarce.
The negative impact of climate change and,
in particular, the rainfall deficit recorded over
recent decades has resulted in a reduction in
the volume of stored water, thus limiting the
amount available for irrigation. The priority
in the allocation of water is given to drinking
water supply. This has involved a reduction in
126
Soils
The soils of the study area are calcareous
with a clayey texture upstream and a loamyclayey texture downstream of the terraces.
They are suitable for growing field crops,
vegetables and adapted fruit trees, except
under some conditions upstream, where
there is swelling clay. In these conditions, soil
moisture has to be high enough to avoid soil
cracking.
Water quality
The main data concerning the physicochemical characteristics of wastewater are
presented in Table 8.4.
127
Treated water
pH
7.45
EC dS/m
3.09
Heavy metals
Elements (ppm)
Raw water
Treated water
7.81
Zn
trace
trace
2.59
Cu
trace
trace
K me/l
1.52
1.19
Fe
15
10
Na me/l
14.24
10.94
Mn
NH4 me/l
129.6
144
Cd
zero
zero
Ca me/l
5.75
4.75
Pb
zero
zero
Mg me/l
74.16
80.02
Co
zero
zero
SO4 me/l
1.82
1.57
Cr
zero
zero
Cl me/l
7.29
7.65
12
10.5
2.41
1.66
HCO me/l
SAR
128
Table 8.5: Effect of irrigation with treated wastewater on wheat yields for WAHA variety over two years: 06/07
and 07/08.
Years
2006/2007
2007/2008
Treatment
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CA
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CS
Average
grain yield
(kg/ha)
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CA
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CS
Average
grain yield
(kg/ha)
Rainfed T1
T2
T3
T4
1423
1706
1740
2003
1923
1871
1953
4359
1673
1788
1846
3181
528
658
715
1430
439
681
655
2218
510
670
685
1824
129
Table 8.6: Effect of irrigation with treated wastewater on wheat yields for Boussalem variety over two years:
06/07 and 07/08.
Years
2006/2007
2007/2008
Treatment
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CA
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CS
Average
grain yield
(kg/h)
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CA
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
CS
Average
grain yield
(kg/ha)
Rainfed,T1
T2
T3
T4
1625
1738
1673
2254
1344
1512
1943
3793
1485
1700
1808
3023
354
576
665
1332
729
1435
1590
1964
542
1006
1128
1643
8.3 References
130