Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257433085
CITATIONS
READS
172
5 authors, including:
Chang S Hsu
Clifford Walters
ExxonMobil
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Kenneth E. Peters
Schlumberger Limited
128 PUBLICATIONS 6,126 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Chapter 9
BIOMARKER ANALYSIS IN PETROLEUM
EXPLORATION
C. S. Hsu1 , C.C. Walters2 , G. H. Isaksen3 , M. E. Schaps 3 , and K.E. Peters3
1. ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co.
Baton Rouge, LA 07821
2. ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co.
Annandale, NJ 08801
3. ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co.
Houston, TX 77252
1.
INTRODUCTION
223
224
Chapter 9
Trap
STRATIGRAPHIC
EXTENT OF
PETROLEUM SYSTEM
nt
me
e
s
Ba
Essential
elements of
POD OF ACTIVE petroleum
SOURCE ROCK
system
Petroleum accumulation
Top of oil window
Bottom of oil window
Trap
Overburden
Seal
Reservoir
Source
Underburden
Sedimentary
basin-fill
Trap
225
and locations and determining their relationship to each other. Such oil-oil
correlations are performed on basin to field scales. Basin-wide studies can lead
to new play and prospects along inferred migration pathways; single field studies
provide understanding of reservoir compartmentalization needed for proper
reservoir development and management.
Economics ultimately determine whether a petroleum accumulation is
developed and brought to market. One of the key factors in financial assessment
is the quality of the petroleum. Biogenic input and depositional environment
determines initial petroleum quality. Marine and evaporate source rocks tend to
generate high sulfur, asphaltic crudes while lacustrine (lake) and terrestrially
influenced (coals, coastal plains, and deltas) tend to generate low sulfur,
paraffinic crudes. Petroleum can be altered greatly by physical, chemical, and
biological processes. Increased thermal stress, either during generation in the
source or while accumulated in the reservoir, leads to hydrocarbon cracking
forming lighter hydrocarbons and solid char. As petroleum migrates, changes in
pressure and temperature may result in a single-phase fluid separating into
distinct liquid and gas phases that may then migrated independently. Once in the
reservoir, petroleum can be altered by microbial activity (biodegradation),
chemical reactions (e.g., thermochemical sulfate reduction), water washing, and
the addition of light hydrocarbons causing asphaltene precipitation. Each of
these alterations leaves a distinct chemical signature and analyses of known
petroleum samples are used to predict trends in oil quality in unexplored regions.
The questions imposed by the demands of exploration and production have
profound influence on the manner in which petroleum geochemists analyze oil.
The interplay of source, thermal maturity, and secondary alteration processes are
often revealed by subtle variations in the isomer distributions of trace molecules
and the isotopic ratios of individual compounds. Consequently, petroleum
geochemists tend to analyze small classes of hydrocarbon compounds in
extraordinary detail, while ignoring others classes that are less diagnostic. In
contrast, refinery chemists are interested mostly how oil behaves as a feedstock
to be processed into marketable products. Their analyses attempt to characterize
all major components and tend to group compounds according to their behavior
during refinery processes and its refined products.
2.
Nearly all of the Earth's natural hydrocarbons and all of its economic
accumulations of petroleum (oil and/or natural gas) and coals are derived from
the thermal alteration of sedimentary organic matter.2,3 On the surface and near
sub-surface, autotropic organisms utilize either solar or chemical energy to
convert inorganic carbon into organic matter, while other organism live off this
organic matter by converting the biomass back into inorganic species. The short-
226
Chapter 9
term carbon cycle between the atmosphere, oceans, biota, and soils is not totally
efficient and a small portion of this organic matter (~4 x 109 g/year) become
sequestered as peat and in sedimentary rocks as insoluble kerogen (Figure 2).
Over the millenium, the pool of sedimentary organic matter has accumulated to
more than 15 x 106 Gt of carbon (1Gt = 1 x 1015 g). A very small portion of this
sedimentary carbon has been converted to coal (~3.5 x 103 Gt) and petroleum
(4.7 x 102 Gt)4 . As petroleum is derived from the organic carbon of once living
organisms, these resources are correctly termed fossil fuels.
AEROBIC
ANAEROBIC
Photosynthesis
Photosynthesis
Cyanobacteria
Algae
Green Plants
Phototrophic
Bacteria
CO2
Organic
Matter
Matter
Burial
Methanogenic
Bacteria
CH4
4
Respiration, Fermentation
Respiration
Burial
Methylotrophic
Bacteria
Organic
Matter
Matter
Coal,
Kerogen
227
O2
O2
OH
OH
OH
Bacteria
Eukaryotic algae
and higher plants
Angiosperms
(flo wering land plants)
OH
Lanosterol
HO
D -pentose
O
OH
Bacteriohopanetetral
O
Diploptene
Oleanonic Acid
Cholesterol
HO
DIAGENESIS
Pentakishomohopane
Oleanane
Cholestane
H opane
Figure 3. Biosynthesis of numerous biochemicals from squalene and their equivalents found in the
geosphere after diagenesis.
228
Chapter 9
11
7
13
9 10
12
14 15
17
16
19
18
20
25
30
Figure 4. Gas chromatogram (FID) of an Ordovician oil from the Michigan Basin showing an
enrichment of odd carbon numbered n-alkanes over the range of n-C11 to n-C19. Such distributions
are characteristic of G. prisca, an extinct organism believed to be related to Botyroccoccus, a
modern green microalgae.
229
B otryococcane
in crude oil
cis-cis-trans-bicadinane
Dipterocarpaceae
4,23,24-trimethylcholestane (dinosterane)
Dinoflagellates
Steranes and triterpanes are ubiquitous in most oils and rock extracts. Some
of these are diagnostic for specific biota. Dinosteranes are produced by
dinoflagellates, n-propylcholestane indicates input from chrysophyte marine
algae, and gammacerane is thought to be derived from tetrahymanol, a
triterpanoid that is produced by anaerobic green-sulfur bacteria and found in
ciliates that consume such organisms. Much of the information gleaned from
steranes and triterpanes arise not from the occurrence but from their relative
distribution. For example, the ratio of hopanes-to-steranes can serve as an
indicator of source facies.9 Low ratios were found in marine sources, while high
ratios were observed for lacustrine and terrigenous sources, shown in Figure 6.
230
Chapter 9
Marine
Paralic
Lacustrine/Terrigenous
Salinity
1 2
10
15
20
25
30
35
Hopane / Sterane
Figure 6. Correlation of source facies with the total hopane/sterane ratio.
231
MESOZOIC
>20%
Oleanane
Quaternary
Neogene
Paleogene
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Pennsylvanian
Mississippian
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
<20%
CENOZOIC
Tertiary
PHANEROZOIC
PALEOZOIC
Terpanes
Cadinanes
Beyerane, Kaurane, Phyllocladane
24-Isopropylcholestanes 24-Nordiacholestanes
24/27 > 0.35
> 0.60
24-Norcholestanes
24/27 > 0.25
> 0.55
DinosteranesAbsent
>30%
< 0.5
Steranes
> 0.7
Botryococcane
AromaticDinosteroidsAbsent
Diterpanes
Isoprenoids
Aromatics
n-Alkanes
232
Chapter 9
OH
21
OH
22
17
17
Diagenesis
22
OH OH
Bacteriohopanetetrol in
Prokaryotic Organism
Hopane in Sediment
(Biological Configuration) 22R
22R
22R
22S
Figure 8. Origin of hopanes in petroleum from bacteriohopanetetrol (1) found in the lipid
membranes of prokaryotic organisms. Stereochemistry is indicated by open () and solid () dots
where the hydrogen is directed into and out of the page, respectively. The biological configuration
(17,21,22R) imposed on bacteriohopanetetrol and its immediate saturated product (2) by
enzymes in the living organism is unstable during catagenesis and undergoes isomerization to
geological configurations (e.g., 3,4,5). The 17,21-hopanes (e.g., 3) are called moretanes, while
all others are hopanes (e.g., 2, 4, 5).
233
20
20
24
24
17
17
Diagenesis
14
14
HO
5
5
R
24
24
24
17
17
14
5,14, 17-20S
20
20
17
20
14
14
5
5,14,17-20R
5,14,17-20S
3.
The majority of major components in petroleum and fossil fuels have been
extensively converted from their biological origins; thus, it would be very
difficult to use them for inference of their biological precursors. Gas
chromatography (GC) has been used for biomarker analysis, particularly for nalkanes, branched alkanes and acyclic isoprenoid hydrocarbons, as they are
234
Chapter 9
usually abundant in crude oils.12 The napthenic biomarkers are present in much
lower quantities and are poorly resolved from interfering non-biomarker
compounds (Figure 10)
4
56
9
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22
23 24
2526
pristane
phytane
27 28293031
323334
35363738
39 40
cyclic biomarkers
Figure 10. Gas chromatogram of a whole oil from onshore California (Monterey Fm.). Normal
alkanes are indicated by their carbon number. Except for the isoprenoid hydrocarbons
(? ),biomarkers are largely undiscernable.
235
Steranes
Saturates
2024 ppm
Whole Oil
17 -Hopanes
38 ppm
24-Ethylcholestane
29%
1773 ppm
145 ppm
17 -Hopanes
Monoaromatic Steroids
Aromatics
24%
1479 ppm
104 ppm
C29 MA-Steroid
Triaromatic Steroids
1086 ppm
49 ppm
C29 TA-Steroid
Figure 11. Biomarkers occur in parts per million (ppm) in most petroleums. The example above
shows the concentration for selected oil fractions in four individual biomarkers in a biodegraded oil
from Hamilton Dome, Wyoming.
236
Chapter 9
assessment in petroleum exploration since the 1960's has largely been due to the
availability of GC-MS, especially after its computerization since the late
1970's.12
R
191
259
217
hopanes
steranes
diasteranes
Figure 12. Formation of characteristic fragment ions of m/z 191 for hopanes and m/z 217 for
steranes.
Figure 13 shows typical reconstructed ion chromatograms (m/z 191 and 217)
for a saturated fraction of an oil from onshore California (a high sulfur crude
derived from the Monterey Formation). The distribution of pentacyclic hopanes
is typical of the Monterey source facies. The oil is enriched with C28
bisnorhopane and C35 pentakishomohopane, characteristic of marine deposition
under highly reducing conditions. The ratio of two C27 hopanes (Ts & Tm) is
used an indicator of thermal maturity. The C31-C35 homohopanes are doublets,
representing the 22S and 22R epimers. These are in equilibrium proportions, as
is typically observed in oils.
The tricyclic terpanes and the steranes are derived from algal marine
phytoplanton. The steranes are dominated by four major isomers of C27 , C28 , and
C29 steranes. The middle two peaks, the 5,14,17-isomers, are more abundant
than the flanking 5,14,17-isomers; consistent with deposition under anoxic,
saline conditions. When summed by carbon number, the steranes are
approximately equal in proportion, typical of a Tertiary marine source with
mixed phytoplanktonic input that includes diatoms. The ratios of 20S to
-20R isomers is a maturity indicator. In this oil, the ratio is slightly below
equilibrium indicating generation early in the oil window. Diasteranes
(rearranged) in this oil are low compared to the normal (non-rearranged)
steranes. This observation is consistent with deposition in a clay-poor
environment (the Monterey Fm. is mostly siliceous chert derived from diatoms)
and with low thermal maturity.
237
Hopanes
28
30
29
31
35
32
23
33
34
24
29
19
20
25
21
22
26
28
Tm
30
Ts
27
28
Normal Steranes
29
20
Diasteranes
21
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Figure 13. Reconstructed m/z 191 and 217 ion chromatograms showing the distribution of
saturated biomarkers in an oil from the Monterey Formation, onshore Californa. Tricyclic terpanes
are indicated by their carbon number in italic. The distribution of pentacyclic hopanes (indicated
by their carbon number) is typical of an anoxic source facies. Four major isomers of C27, C28, and
C29 regular steranes are observed in the m/z 217 ion chromatogram.
Conventional GC-MS resolves and identifies most of the major saturated and
aromatic biomarkers. The steranes, however, are particularly problematic as
there are numerous compounds that co-elute and yield that same diagnostic
fragment (Figure 14). The C26 steranes and diasteranes are very useful indicators
of geological age. These compounds are typically an order of magnitude less
abundant than C27 diasteranes that co-elute. C30 steranes occur as npropylcholestanes, isopropylcholestanes, and numerous methylated variations.
The latter biomarkers are characterized by the m/z 231 ion, but also yield an
interferring m/z 217 ion fragment. The C30 steroidal hydrocarbons occur in
highly variable amounts, ranging from total absence to concentrations greater
238
Chapter 9
than the regular C28 -C29 steranes which may co-elute. In oils from lacustrine and
paralic environments, the steranes may be substantially less abundant then
hopanes, bicadinanes, and other hydrocarbons. In such samples the m/z 217 ion
trace may be dominated by the response from these non-steroidal hydrocarbons.
C26
M+ 368
C27
M+ 372
C 28
M+ 386
C2 9
M+ 400
C 30
75
80
85
90
Time (min)
M+ 414
95
100
105
110
Figure 14. Reconstructed (m/z 217) ion chromatogram showing the elution range of diasteranes
and steranes by carbon number.
4.
239
through while the first stage MS is scanned to monitor the molecular ions of
biomarkers that produce the selected characteristic ions. By linking the
molecular ions and characteristic fragment ions together, only biomarker
compounds that yield both ions are detected while other co-eluting nonbiomarker compounds are filtered out. Thus, GC-MS-MS provides interferencefree measurement of biomarker compounds, resulting in baseline resolution of
the chromatographic peaks.
Mass
Collision-Induced
Separation
Fragmentation
Fixed on
Specific Mass
X
A+
X+
AB
AC
Y
A+
B+
C+
AB+
AC+
Y+
Compound
Separation
B+
C+
Ion
Ion
Ionization Separation Reaction Separation Detection
Syringe
Ion
Source
Gas Chromatograph
Analyzer
Collision
Chamber
Analyzer
Electron
Multiplier
Figure 15. Isomer specificity provided by GC-MS-MS. Co-eluting compounds can be resolved
by a first stage mass filter that passes only molecular ions of a specific mass (AB and AC). These
are fragmented (by collosion with a gas in second quadrupole). Ions diagnostic for a biomarker are
passed through to the detector.
240
Chapter 9
The GC-MS m/z 217 ion trace for this same sample is shown in Figure 14.
A comparison of the two clearly shows the advantage of using MS-MS over MS
dectection. Most, but not all, of the major C27 -C29 peaks are comparable, but
lack baseline resolution. Quantifying the C26 and C30 steranes is nearly
impossible in the GC-MS analysis, but easily accomplished using GC-MS-MS.
Another characteristic more apparent in the GC-MS-MS is the partial separation
of several of the C28 (386 ? 217) peaks into doublets. These are 24S and 24R
epimers that are not chromatographically resolved in the C29 and C30 steranes.
M+ 368
C2 6
A
H
F
G
E
M+ 372
C2 7
M+ 386
M+ 400
M+ 414
C2 8
C2 9
C3 0
Figure 16. GC-MS-MS ion chromatograms showing the distribution of C26-C30 steranes. The GCMS m/z 217 trace for this same oil is shown in Figure 14.
241
Figure 17. GC-MS-MS resolves interfering biomarkers for thermal maturity assessment.
242
5.
Chapter 9
23 C2 9 S
Principal Component 2
0.2
C29 R 24 4
C2 7 S
C2 9 R
29
26
20 C29 S
2117
25
27
11
16
86
20
15 13
16
10
61
916
7
214
C2 8 R
19
C30 35 16
3 C22
C2 7 R 5
C27 40 C30 R
C29 27
-0.2
C28 18
12 C27 R
31 C29 R
-0.4
C2 8 R
22
-0.6
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
Principal Component 1
Figure 18. Loading plot of Western Canadian Basin source rock extracts for the first two principal
components.
Principal Component 2
0.1 D DD
D
D
DTT TT
D M
0
JJ
JJ
J
J J
J
JJ
J J
J J
J
K: Cretaceoujs
J: Jurassic
T: Triassic
M: Mississippian
D: Devonian
D
D
-0.1
243
-0.2
K
K
KK
-0.4
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
Principal Component 1
Figure 19. Score plot of Western Canadian Basin source rock extracts for the first two principal
components. Rock sources - K: Cretaceous Manville Formation, J: Jurassic Nordegg Formation,
T: Triassic Doig Formation, M: Mississippian Exshaw/Bakken Formation, and D: Devonian
Duvernay Formation.
6.
FUTURE PROSPECTIVES
244
Chapter 9
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
245
REFERENCES
Magoon, L.B.; Beaumont, E.A. "Petroleum Systems". In Handbook of Petroleum Geology:
Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps, Beumont, E.A.; Foster, H.N. (eds). AAPG 1999, 3-1 to 334.Hunt, J. M. Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology, W. H. Freeman and Co.: San
Francisco, 1979
Tissot, B. P.; Welte, D. H. Petroleum Formation and Occurance, 2nd ed. Spinger-Verlag:
Berlin, 1984
Hunt, J. M. Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co.: San
Francisco, 1996
Falkowski, P.; Scholes, R.J.; Boyle, E.; et al. Science, 2000, 290(5490), 251-259
Philp, R. P. Fossil Fuel Biomarkers: Applications and Spectra, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1985.
Johns, R.B. (ed.) Biological markers in the sedimentary record., Methods in Geochemistry
and Geophysics 24 Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1986.
Peters, K.E.; Moldowan J.M. The Biomarker Guide; Interpreting Molecular Fossils in
Petroleum and Ancient Sediments Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, United States, 1993
Summons, R.E.; Metzger, P.; Largeau, C.; Murray, A.P.;Hope, J.M. Organic Geochemistry
2002 33(2), 99-109.
Isaksen, G. H. Oil & Gas J. 3/18/91; pp. 130
Brocks J. J.; Logan, G.A.; Buick, R.; Summons, R. E. Science, 1999 285, 1033-1036.
Holba A.G.; Dzou, L.I.P.; Masterson, W. D.; et al (1998). Organic Geochemistry, 1998, 29,
1269-1283.
Hsu, C. S.; Drinkwater, D. "Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry in the Petroleum
Industry" In Current Practice of Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, W. M. A. Niessen
(Ed.), Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001.
Warburten, G. A.; Zumberge, J. E. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 123-126.
Watson, J. T. Introduction to Mass Spectrometry, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia,
1997
Karr, D.E.; Walters C.C.Rapid Comm. Mass Spec. 1996, 10, 1088-1092.
Kramer, R. Chemometric Techniques for Quantitative Analysis, Marcel Dekker: New York,
1998
17. Christie, O.H.J. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory System 1992,14, 319-329.
18. Peters, K.E., Sarg, J.F., Enrico, R.J., Snedden, J.W. & Sulaeman, A. AAPG Bulletin 2000, 84,
12-44.
19. Hsu, C. S.; Dechert, G. J.; Schaps, M. E.; Hieshima, G. B. Proc. 43rd ASMS Conf. on Mass
Spectrom. and Allied Top., Atlanta, GA, May 21-26, 1995; P. 474
20. Frysinger, G.S. ;Gaines, R.B. Journal of Separation Science 2001, 24, 87-96.
21. Talbot, H.M.; Watson, D.F.; Murrell, J.C.; Carter, J.F.; Farrimond, P. Journal of
Chromatography A 2001, 921, 175-185.
22. Watson, D.F.; Farrimond, P. Organic Geochemistry 2000, 31, 1247-1252.
23. Hayes J. M.; Takigiku, R.; Ocampo, R.; Callot, H. J.; Albrecht, A. Nature 1987, 329, 48-51.
24. Freeman K. H.; Hayes, J. M.; Trendel, J. M.; Albrecht, P. Nature 1990, 343, 254-256.