Você está na página 1de 8


A Musical Distortion Primer
Copyright 1993-2000

R.G. Keen - Geo-Fex Cybernetic Music

A Musical Distortion Primer

Copyright 1993-2000 R.G. Keen - Geo-Fex Cybernetic Music
This is an introduction to the basic means of distorting a signal in a musically useful way. The approach is as nontechnical as possible. I use the simplest signal waveform, a sine wave, to illustrate all these, although a guitar is
much more like a sawtooth than a sine wave. The clipped waveforms will be shown in their raw state. Tone
controls or filters after the clipping will radically alter the waveshapes.
Sine wave. This is the purest tone possible, just a single
frequency. No musical instrument does a really pure sine wave,
although tuning forks and some flute tones approach this.
Notice that the waveform is smoothly rounded everywhere, no
sudden changes in direction.
To engineers and mathematicians, the sine wave is the
simplest waveform, because any other repetitive waveform can
be built up from a collection of sine waves of different
frequencies and sizes. Sine waves, on the other hand, are not
made up of anything more basic that anyone has found yet.
In music, we recognize the significance of the sine wave by talking about fundamentals and partials. A
fundamental is taken to be the basic tone of any given note - for instance the frequency A-440 is the standard for
musical tuning. This is a sine wave that has a frequency of 440 Hz (Hz is short for "Hertz", and stands for one
cycle per second). We recognize that a tone of A-880 is one octave higher than A-440. Musicians may refer to a
musical note that has both A-440 and A-880 mixed as have a fundamental and the first partial. A frequency of
three times the basic note frequency is also referred to as the third partial of the basic note. Four times the
fundamental is the fourth partial, and so on into the stratosphere.
Engineers call partials "harmonics". When we talk of "total harmonic distortion", we mean whatever is left after
taking out the fundamental sine wave in some waveform. All the harmonics, or partials and any noise make this
Mild clipping. If we take that same sine wave and
electronically clip off the tops and bottoms at some clipping
level, we get something like this:
Just snipping off those tips has a big effect on the sound. A
pure sine wave is kind of boring sounding. Distorting the sine
wave by clipping introduces a whole bunch of partials or
harmonics. The sound is much more interesting to listen to, as
long as we don't get too carried away with it.

There is a real difference in the sound depending on how sharp the "edges" are where the clipping occurred.
Perfect, sharp corner edges cause buzzy, hard edged sounds. Rounded, smooth edges give a smooth sound.
While there is no particular reason why these two effects should be related, it does seem to be true that smooth
sounds are related to smooth waveforms, and buzzy or harsh sounds are related to sharp corners on waveforms.

Musically, some so-called "overdrive" pedals do something like this. It's just a bit of clipping. While I have shown
the positive and negative clipping levels as the same - so-called symmetrical clipping - there is no reason that
they must be the same. The human ear can clearly hear the difference between symmetrical and nonsymmetrical clipping.
If we want to get really distorted, we can amplify the sine wave a lot, and then clip it off at the same level as we
just did the un-amplified sine wave. The amplified sine wave get really, really tall, then is clipped back. It looks like
As you can see, the sine wave has been amplified a lot, then
clipped off so that only the starting part of the sine wave
remains. This has even more harmonics than the moderately
clipped one. The result is a heavily buzzy sound.
You can see where this is headed, right? The more we amplify
the sine wave and clip the excess back off, the more it
approaches a square wave. The next two examples show the
completion of this .

There are in fact instruments that are designed to create perfect square waves from sine waves by amplifying the
crud out of them and then clipping the result back down to a very small fraction of its amplified size.
REALLLY clipping the sine wave gives a sound that's a high gain, hard edged metal kind of sound. Lots of heavy
metal distortion pedals pedals do this then round the corners with some filtering.
You eventually get to a true square wave. Some early
fuzzboxes actually did this. It sounds something like a
synthesizer; very buzzy. This can sound OK, even useful,
unless you hit two notes at once, then makes an unpleasant
harsh distortion from the two (intermodulation distortion).
Intermodulation distortion is the bane of fuzzbox technology. If
you take any two pure sine waves and intermodulate them, you
get not only the two sine waves, but two other frequencies - the
sum of the two originals, and the difference. If we had A-440
and A-880, and intermodulated them, we'd get 440, 880, 440
again from the difference, and 1320, which is three times A440. This would actually sound pretty good.
The bad part about this is that we picked the best possible example. However, if we take A-440 and the note an
octave and a third up, 1467 Hz, we get the original notes plus 1026 Hz, and 1907 Hz. These frequencies are NOT
related to the original note and sound harsh or out of tune. We're also talking about sine waves. Real world
signals always have some harmonics, and we get the sums and difference of all the harmonics, too. Very
So the name of the game is to produce harmonic distortion, which makes musically good sounding notes and to
minimize intermodulation distortion, which makes un-musical squarks and harsh buzzes. Unfortunately, no matter
how hard we try, we can never get all harmonic distortion and no intermodulation distortion. But we can pick
between distortion mechanisms to use the better ones and avoid the worse ones.

One way to keep mostly harmonic distortion is to not have sharp corners.
"Tube-ish" distortion is much like this.
It has very softly rounded, squashed tops when done on square waves.
From the engineer's standpoint, something very different from the clipping
progression above has happened here.
A true techie thinks of any wiggle of a waveform as carrying information. A
pure sine wave is almost devoid of information, having no wiggles or corners
in that smoothly rounded top. However, if we took a square wave and
massively amplified it, or a triangle wave, or a wave with spikes all over its
top and did the same amplify/clip operation on it, we'd get exactly the same
result as with the sine wave with massive clipping.
In effect, we can't tell after massive clipping what we originally started with. We've actually lost the information
about what the wave used to be - it's forever removed by the clipper. We should not be surprised that all
waveforms sound alike after massive clipping. It's kind of the Veg-a-matic of sound.
The compression-limiting clipping that does this tube-ish distortion is very different in the information sense. The
top of the wave is compressed, sometimes massively; however, the original information about what the input
wave used to be is not lost, just compressed. Distortion with this compression nature keeps some of the flavor of
the original input, which many guitar players like.
This is not a perfect replica of vacuum tube distortion. Vacuum tubes are not symmetrical enough to do this. The
CMOS gate based pedals like the ElectroHarmonix Hot Tubes can. Tubes are similar, but the tops and bottoms
are not mirror images. The sound is soft, smooth onset, touch sensitive, "bluesy".
There are things we can do other than clip or limit a signal.
To get an octave sound, we can full wave rectify it.
A full wave rectified sine wave just has either all the positive or
negative half-cycles inverted. A lot of math is needed, but it
eventually tells us that the lowest frequency component in this is
twice the original sine frequency - an exact octave higher than
the original sine.
This trick has been used to one degree or another in the Tycho
Brahe Octavia, UniVox SuperFuzz, Foxx Fuzz-Wah, and Foxx
Tone Machine pedals. It is common to follow full wave
rectification with diode clipping and some filtering, as the raw
waveform sounds a bit buzzy and strange - it literally has
information in it we don't want!
Having the signal completely full wave rectified does eliminate the fundamental frequency. Sometimes this is not
desirable. If we half wave rectify a sine wave, the result still has a lot of the fundamental in it, but also has a
noticeable octave sound. We can also partial full wave rectify a signal, which makes for an even more noticeable
octave sound. There is a continuum of sounds between pure sine, partially rectified and full wave rectified, having
more octave sound as we go.

In fact, anything we do to one side of a sine wave but not the other will introduce an octave sound.
The following picture illustrates this. From an undistorted sine wave (1), we progressively clip the negative half
cycle (2) until the signal is half wave rectified (3); adding even more second harmonic (4) progresses until full
wave rectification (5).

One specialized form of distortion is worth noting. High gain followed by, asymmetrical clipping, hard clip on top,
soft compression on bottom turns out to be a good sounding compromize for guitar. The fabled Fuzz Face did this
- at least when you got one of the good ones.

And some comments on the circuits that actually produce the distortions:
I tried to catalog all of the ways I could think of that have been or might be used for musically useful distortion,
with some running critique.
Two kinds of distortion: As I noted above, simple harmonic distortion, which generates distortion products that
are related to the fundamental frequency by low-integer multiples, is universally accepted as adding character to
instrument sound. Intermodulation distortion, which produces non-musically related frequencies at multiples of the
sum and differences of two frequencies, is considered to sound harsh to the ear. Unfortunately, all known
harmonic distortion methods also produce intermodulation distortion when fed two or more different frequencies
simultaneously, but the exact method of producing distortion may result in lower or higher amounts of harsh
sounding intermodulation; there is no exact way to predict the harshness. In general, the "softer" the clipping or
distortion (that is, the fewer and softer the "corners"), the less intermodulation, but this is only a generality.
PRE and POST distortion EQ: Filtering of the signal both before and after the distortion usually has at least as
much if not more to do with how the distortion sounds than the actual method of distortion.
A combo amp with a speaker or two and an open back implements a multi-pole lowpass filter all by itself. This is
at least one of the reasons that a miked amp is preferable to running a distortion signal directly into a PA mixer.
The speaker cabinet's lowpass action smooths off those offending treble shrieks. An electronic multipole lowpass
filter is the essence of all those "cabinet simulators" you see.
Filtering BEFORE the distortion is also interesting. Hendrix is reputed to have used a Wah pedal before his Fuzz
Face. The bandpass effect makes the signal bigger at the frequencies boosted by the Wah, so those frequencies
get distorted most. You get an interesting change in distortion depending on what notes you hit. This cuts a lot of
the harsh sounding intermodulation distortion, too. Anderton used this principle in designing his "QuadraFuzz",
which split the incoming signal into four frequency bands and distorted each band separately, then mixed them
back together. This method gives a much lower intermodulation distortion by avoiding having more than one
frequency distorted together.
One of the most interesting experiments with distortion most guitarists ever make is to put a multiband graphic
equalizer both in front of and behind a distortion pedal. Some time spent playing with the knobs on this one will
give you a whole new outlook on distortion.
Duty Cycle: Based on an article in Electrical Engineering Times, continuously changes in the relative amounts of
clipping between the positive and negative halves of the signal may be an important factor in distortion sound.
This article (by Brian Murphy, interviewing John Murphy, who used to be chief engineer at Carvin; EET, October
3, 1994) outlines Murphy's ideas on the degree to which he can simulate tube distortion in solid state designs. He
holds that if you filter properly, soft clip, and arrange for the duty cycle of the clipped signal to vary with varying
signal levels, you get something very close to tube distortion. This is the basis of the "tube emulation" circuitry in
Carvin's SX series of amps.
Circuit Types:
1. Common Cathode Triode: "preamp distortion", used in the revered Bassman, Marshalls, modern tube
preamps; frequency response easily made lowpass (sometimes unintentionally) by grid circuit and stray
capacitances. Thought to be the object of our search. Typically 2% distortion when "clean". Clips
asymmetrically, although as typically used, cutoff is mushy and more of progressive compression than
clipping, and "saturation" is defined by the grid going more positive than the cathode, with a dramatic drop
in grid impedance when this happens, perhaps "saturating" the previous triode stage. Lots of even order

distortion products until harder clipping reached, then third harmonic rises Almost no fifth or higher order
harmonic production until massively over driven.
2. Single ended Pentode: "output stage distortion", as in smaller, cheaper amps, like Fender Champ,
several Gibsons, others. Asymmetrical clipping, asymmetric distortion from the single ended transformer.
Distinct second and third harmonics. Very noticeable compression effects from screen grid bias drop,
power supply sag.
3. Double ended Pentode: "output stage distortion" as in large amps, including the Bassman. Push pull
operation cancels even harmonic distortion generated in the output stage, so it can contribute only odd
harmonics, principally third. Noticeable bias shift when driven hard can cause compression. Other
compression effects include screen grid bias sag, and power supply sag. This may be the origin of the
"tube rectifiers sound better" school of guitar amps, as silicon replacement power supply rectifiers give
much less sag on signal peaks and higher power supply voltages, so sound cleaner. Symmetric
4. Voltage feedback/biased bipolar Germanium: "Fuzz Face" distortion. Single high gain stage
saturates with guitar signal, is biased in a way that can not hard saturate, but can swing a long way
towards cutoff without distortion. Low input impedance loads guitar and pre-filters out highs. Asymmetrical
clipping, with prominent second harmonic. Prominent third, and noticeable fourth and fifth harmonics. This
is the basic circuit in several vintage fuzzes, including the Vox Tone Bender. Fuzz faces changed from
Germanium PNP (NKT-275) to silicon NPN (BC 108 etc) transistors in about 1970. For a detailed review
of the Fuzz Face, see "The Technology of the Fuzz Face".
5. Voltage feedback/biased bipolar Silicon: Some fuzz face units have this. Widely reputed to sound a
little harsher than germanium.
6. Common emitter bipolar Silicon: "transistor sound". Nominally well designed CE stages clip
symmetrically and hard. No noticeable even order harmonics, prominent fifth, seventh, and higher
harmonics. Widely held to be an example of what is wrong with transistors for musical instruments. It can
be a useful effect, as the Big Muff Pi from Electro-Harmonix used a variation of this circuit with limiting
diodes from collector to emitter.
7. Common emitter bipolar Germanium: Never seen this. Probably same as silicon.
8. Common Source JFET: This has been the basis of some experimental devices in the DIY area. Well
designed JFET CS stages generate only second order harmonics in the linear range, but who knows
about clipped? I have seen postings that say that a well-designed JFET common source stage produces
clipping very similar to tubes..
9. Common Source MOSFET: The common source MOSFET is the basic circuit in Anderton's Tube Sound
Fuzz. A similar circuit is used in Fender's Stage Lead, and EH "Hot Tubes" pedals. This circuit can
produce very convincing tube-like distortion if it is carefully designed. The commonest way to do this
circuit is with the CD4049 or CD4069 CMOS logic (yes, logic) IC. It can be misapplied by biasing it into its
linear region and to function as an amplifier. I don't know of any discrete transistor versions, although
Fender used a CD 4007 IC in the Stage Lead amps to get tubey sound. The 4007 is essentially a CMOS
transistor array. If you use the 4007, you can put two P-channel devices and three N-channel devices in
parallel and achieve an asymetrical transfer function.
10. Differential amplifier: Differential amps built with bipolar transistors have a 25 millivolt input range over
which the output is linear. Clipping is symmetrical, but possibly soft. This is the basic stage in most op
amps. This basic circuit can be implemented as silicon bipolar, germanium bipolar, JFET, MOSFET and
vacuum tube. Electronics Now published a DIY article for just such a pedal, claiming (as every distortion
pedal does...) that it sounded very tube-y.
11. One diode: One diode as a half wave rectifier or clamp generates prominent second harmonic distortion;

12. Back to back diodes, Silicon, Zener, Germanium, LED. Many examples of this. This and the back to
back feedback op amp are the basis for a lot of effects, such as the Ibanez Sonic Distortion 9, Proco Ratt,
MXR Distortion +, and the DOD Overdrive. Also many that need to remain unmentioned. A lot seems to
depend on how the diodes are driven and what filtering is done before and after the diodes.
Silicon is reputed to clip abruptly, causing a harsh sound. Germanium clips at about half the voltage of a
silicon diode, but is reputed to turn on more slowly in its smaller range. LEDs turn on at about two silicon
diode drops, and are also reputed to be slower turn on, with it and germanium giving more "tube like"
sounds. Some units with "tube" in the title use LEDs or germanium for clipping.
Oddly enough, the Marshall JCM800 uses a set of two pairs of silicon diodes back to back as clippers.
This seems strange in a Marshall, but it is there. When I looked at the schematic, I first thought it was a
protective clamp for a tube grid, but the circuit doesn't work that way. They are there for the distortion.
I've never seen a schematic with zener clipping for music, but they are used in the signal processing
One recent entry is the diode-connected MOSFET transistor. This connection makes for a "diode" that
has about a two volt forward drop, but a "knee" that is very softly curved.
13. Back to back diode feedback Op Amp: Silicon, Germanium, Zener, LED. In well designed units, this is
very much the same as the back to back diode units. If the opamp gain is low, the diodes produce about
the same end waveform as if they were driven by an external circuit. In poorly designed circuits, the
opamp gain is high, and the diode characteristics are lost, giving just a lower-voltage clipping op amp,
which suffers from all of the problems of the bipolar common emitter stage, and perhaps a few of its own.
The most famous example I can think of of the diodes-in-the-feedback-loop pedal is the Ibanez TS-9
Tube Screamer. Almost every commercial pedal manufacturer has made one of these. The quality of the
sound seems to depend heavily on the overload and recovery characteristics of the opamp and the preand post- clipping filtering. For more info on the Tube Screamer pedal, see "The Technology of the Tube
14. Op amp or comparator: Craig Anderton published a design for a "triggered fuzz" that is pure, open loop,
op amp clipping. This is an odd effect, akin to a synthesizer rather than a guitar in sound.
15. Full wave rectifier: Anderton again. An op amp circuit for emulating ideal diodes produces a full wave
rectification of the input waveform. Gives a very prominent octave up by producing a second harmonic
and removing the fundamental. Works best with single notes. Multiple notes simultaneously give a
metallic or clanging effect something like a ring modulator. An odd effect.
The Octavia pedal and the the old Foxx Tone Machine (as well as the "new" Experience pedal, which is
almost exactly the same circuit as the Foxx) use a form of full wave rectification followed by diode clippers
and filtering. The clipping and filtering seem to tame the odd buzziness of the raw rectification.