Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
www.elsevier.com/locate/powtec
Abstract
In the present work, a grinding rate constant, i.e., a selection function was measured for five solid materials using a tumbling ball mill, and
effects of a grinding ball diameter and a feed particle size on the grinding rate constant of the materials were investigated. The tendency in the
variation of the grinding rate constant with the feed size was similar in the all materials used, but was independent of the ball diameter. These
relations for all materials can be expressed by modifying Snows equation. In addition, we examined the descriptions of the grinding rate
constant using two kinds of selection functions derived theoretically by Tanaka.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Grinding rate constant; Selection function; Ball mill; Ball diameter; Feed size
1. Introduction
Comminution is an important operation and is widely
utilized in many industries in which raw materials are converted into intermediate or finer sized products. For a long
time, grinding processes, especially on tumbling ball mills,
have been subjected to statistical and kinetic analysis [1,2].
According to the comminution kinetics, a batch grinding
process can be expressed by using two basic functions, i.e.,
the selection function which indicates the fracture probability of a particle, and the breakage function which shows the
size distribution of fractured particles.
Eq. (1) is a typical expression of the rate in a batch
grinding process [3,4],
i1
X
dmi t
Si mi t
bi;j Sj mj t;
dt
j1
where mi(t) is the mass fraction of the particles of component i, Si the selection function, bi,j the ratio at which
particles of the ground component j become particles of
component i, and t the grinding time.
dR
K1 R:
dt
Silica glass
Quartz
Limestone
Gypsum
Talc
197
Density
(kgm 3)
Mohs
hardness
()
Vickers
hardness
(kgf mm 2)
Youngs
modulus
(GPa)
Poissons
ratio ( )
2,150
2,620
2,700
2,300
2,780
6.5
6.5
4
2
1
465
245
115
36 70
12
73.5
87.1
68.0
37.8
15
0.16
0.16
0.32
0.32
0.33
3=2
Austin [6] and Zhao et al. [9] used the following equation
to express the change in K1( = S1) with the feed size but the
equation could not explain on the experimental values in the
coarse particle size range,
lnxf =l
a
a
S1 axf Qz axf Q
;
4
lnr
where a and a are constants, Q(z) is the Gaussian distribution function, xf and z are the feed size and a dimensionless
parameter, respectively. l is the feed size when Q(z) = 0.5,
and lnr denotes the standard deviation of Q(z).
Snow [14] quoted the ball milling data reported by
Kelsall et al. [5] and showed that the relationship between
the selection function and the feed size could be empirically
expressed by Eq. (5),
a
S1
xf
xf
exp
;
5
Sm
xm
xm
where xm is the feed size at which S1 is the maximum value,
which is defined as Sm. In the previous studies [12,13], it
was reported that Eq. (5) proposed by Snow could not
sufficiently explained the dependency of the dimensionless
grinding rate constant on the feed size. Thus, we revised the
Snow s equation as follow;
a
K1
xf
xf xm
exp c
;
6
Km
xm
xm
S1;b ~
, nc1 16;
xf
dm
xf
xf
exp
~ exp cV
dB
dB
dB
dB
, dm ~xf 17;
where cVis a constant.
It is necessary to consider simultaneously the influences of the impact force of ball media to particles and the
contact between particles and impacting balls on the
breakage rate in a ball mill. From the points of view
mentioned above, the geometrical mean of these relations
can be shown as Eq. (9),
s
xf
xf
3=2
d B xf
exp cV
dB
dB
cV xf
dB0:25 xf exp
;
2 dB
p
K1 ~ S1;a S1;b ~
uK1
C1 VdB0:25 xf exp
xf
C2 V
;
dB
2. Experiment
where c is a constant.
This equation enables us to be consistent with the
experimental results, so that we have proposed Eq. (6) to
Table 2
Experimental conditions in silica glass
Ball diameter, dB (mm)
Feed size, xf (mm)
Number of feed size
xf/dB ( )
3
1.68 1.41 to
0.105 0.088
12
0.515 0.032
5
2.38 2.0 to
0.149 0.105
11
0.438 0.023
10
3.36 2.83 to
0.149 0.125
11
0.31 0.0137
20
4.0 3.36 to
0.149 0.125
12
0.184 0.0069
30
8.0 6.7 to
0.105 0.088
19
0.245 0.032
198
Table 3
Experimental conditions in quartz
Ball diameter, dB (mm)
Feed size, xf (mm)
Number of feed size
xf/dB ( )
3
1.18 1.0 to
0.075 0.038
12
0.36 0.019
5
2.0 1.7 to
0.075 0.038
15
0.37 0.011
10
1.7 1.4 to
0.075 0.038
14
0.16 0.0057
20
4.0 3.35 to
0.075 0.038
19
0.18 0.0028
30
4.0 3.35 to
0.075 0.038
19
0.12 0.0019
Table 4
Experimental conditions in limestone
Ball diameter, dB (mm)
Feed size, xf (mm)
Number of feed size
xf/dB ( )
3
1.0 0.85 to
0.075 0.038
11
0.31 0.019
5
2.0 1.7 to
0.75 0.038
12
0.37 0.011
10
1.4 1.18 to
0.075 0.038
13
0.13 0.0057
20
3.36 2.8 to
0.075 0.038
17
0.154 0.0028
30
3.36 2.8 to
0.075 0.038
18
0.103 0.0019
Table 5
Experimental conditions in gypsum
Ball diameter, dB (mm)
Feed size, xf (mm)
Number of feed size
xf/dB ( )
3
0.85 0.71 to
0.075 0.038
10
0.26 0.019
5
1.7 1.4 to
0.075 0.038
14
0.31 0.011
10
1.7 1.4 to
0.075 0.038
13
0.155 0.0057
20
3.36 2.8 to
0.075 0.038
17
0.154 0.019
30
3.36 2.8 to
0.075 0.038
17
0.103 0.0019
3
0.6 0.5 to
0.075 0.038
8
0.18 0.019
5
0.71 0.6 to
0.075 0.038
9
0.13 0.011
10
1.18 1.0 to
0.075 0.038
12
0.11 0.0057
20
1.7 1.4 to
0.075 0.038
14
0.078 0.0028
30
1.7 1.4 to
0.075 0.038
14
0.052 0.0019
Table 6
Experimental conditions in talc
Ball diameter, dB (mm)
Feed size, xf (mm)
Number of feed size
xf/dB ( )
199
Fig. 1. Relationship between mass fraction of feed size and grinding time
(dB = 20 mm, Quartz).
Fig. 3. Relationship between mass fraction of feed size and grinding time
(dB = 10 mm, Quartz).
Fig. 2. Relationship between mass fraction of feed size and grinding time
(dB = 20 mm, Talc).
200
other, suggesting that the basis of comminution processes in a ball mill results from the interactions
between grinding balls and particles, and that the
essence of this mechanism does not change even if
the feed materials are changed. Eq. (6) can follow the
experimental results well with by choosing parameters,
a = 1.23 and c = 1.08.
3.4. Grinding rate constant of materials used
Fig. 6 shows the relationship between the dimensionless grinding rate constant and the dimensionless
feed size for the five kinds of solid materials used in
this experiment. The relationships look similar to each
201
Table 7
Values of constants in Eqs. (10) and (11)
Material
AV
BV
Silica glass
Quartz
Limestone
Gypsum
Talc
0.13
0.22
0.19
0.17
0.17
0.84
0.60
0.51
0.60
0.48
0.012
0.015
0.0092 (dB V 20 mm)
0.027 (dB V 20 mm)
0.082 (dB V 10 mm)
1.27
1.21
1.42 (dB V 20 mm)
1.06 (dB V 20 mm)
0.89 (dB V 10 mm)
Table 8
Values of constants in Eq. (12)
Material
C1
C2
Silica glass
Quartz
Limestone
Gypsum
Talc
0.36
0.28
0.22
0.70
2.1
8.3
4.9
6.0
6.4
6.4
0.35
0.47
0.80
0.32
0.30
0.84
0.60
0.51
0.60
0.48
10
11
into Eq. (6), the grinding rate constant for the each
material can be expressed by the ball diameter and the
feed size;
xf
K1 C1 dBm xaf exp C2 n
dB
ua 1:23;
12
202
13
C2 V 34:5Y 0:34 :
14
Substitution of Eqs. (13) and (14) into Eq. (9), Eq. (15) can
be given,
xf
K1 31:4Y 1:07 dB0:25 xf exp 34:5Y 0:34
:
dB
15
4. Conclusion
In this study, we performed batch grinding tests of five
kinds of materials with a ball mill and investigated the
influences of ball diameters and feed sizes on the grinding
rate constant, i.e., selection function. The results were
summarized as follows.
1. The correlations were observed between the optimum
feed size and the ball diameter, and between the
maximum grinding rate constant and the ball diameter
for the materials used.
2. The empirical equations of the grinding rate constant for
the solid materials were obtained as a function of the ball
diameter and the feed size.
3. It was confirmed experimentally that the variation of
dimensionless grinding rate constant with feed size was
roughly analogous irrespective of ball diameters and
kinds of materials, and the revised Snows equation was
useful to explain experimental results.
4. The empirical equation based on Tanakas theories was
roughly possible to estimate the grinding rate constant
when varying with not only the ball diameter and the
feed size but also the property of material.
Nomenclature
a
constant in Eq. (4) (min a)
bi, j
fraction of broken particles of size j which falls
into the particle size i ( )
c
constant in Eq. (6) ( )
cV
constant in Eq. (8) ( )
C1
constant in Eq. (12) ( )
C2
constant in Eq. (12) ( )
C 1V
constant in Eq. (9) ( )
C 2V
constant in Eq. (9) ( )
dB
ball diameter (mm)
K1
grinding rate constant of feed size reduction ( = S1)
(min 1)
K1,calc. calculation value of K1 (min 1)
K1,exptl. experimental value of K1 (min 1)
Km
maximum value of K1 ( = Sm) (min 1)
m
constant in Eq. (12) ( )
m1(t)
mass fraction of maximum particle size at time t ( )
mi(t)
mass fraction of particle component i at time t ( )
mj(t)
mass fraction of particle component j at time t ( )
n
constant in Eq. (12) ( )
Q(z)
Gaussian distribution function ( )
R
mass fraction of feed size ( = m1(t)) ( )
S1
S1,a
S1,b
Si
Sj
Sm
t
Y
xf
xm
z
a
l
lnr
References
[1] B. Epstein, Logarithmic-normal distribution in breakage of solids,
Ind. Eng. Chem. 40 (1948) 2289 2291.
[2] J.A. Herbst, D.W. Fuerstenau, The zero-order production of fine sizes
in comminution and its implications in simulation, Trans. AIME 241
(1968) 538 549.
[3] A.M. Gaudin, T.P. Meloy, Model and a comminution distribution
equation for repeated fracture, Trans. AIME 223 (1962) 43 50.
[4] K.J. Reid, A solution to the batch grinding equation, Chem. Eng. Sci.
20 (1965) 953 963.
[5] D.F. Kelsall, K.J. Reid, C.J. Restarick, Continuous grinding in a small
wet ball mill: Part I. A study of the influence of ball diameter, Powder
Technol. 1 (1968) 291 300.
203
[6] L.G. Austin, K. Shoji, P.T. Lukie, The effect of ball Size on mill
performance, Powder Technol. 14 (1976) 71 79.
[7] Y. Kanda, H. Gunji, H. Takeuchi, K. Sasaki, Rate constants of wet and
dry ball mill grinding, J. Soc. Mat. Sci., Jpn. 27 (1978) 663 666.
[8] Y. Kuwahara, Doctoral thesis, Tohoku University, p. 67 (1985).
[9] Q.Q. Zhao, G. Jimbo, The effect of grinding media on the breakage
rate of planetary mill, J. Soc. Powder Technol., Jpn. 25 (1988)
603 608.
[10] S. Nomura, K. Hosoda, T. Tanaka, An analysis of the selection function for mills using balls as grinding media, Powder Technol. 68
(1991) 1 12.
[11] T. Tanaka, A design procedure for various types of closed circuit
grinding systems including plural mills and classifiers, J. Soc. Powder
Technol., Jpn. 31 (1994) 333 337.
[12] Y. Kanda, K. Shimodaira, N. Kotake, Y. Abe, Experimental study on
the grinding rate constant of a ball mill: effects of feed size and ball
diameter, Kona 17 (1999) 220 225.
[13] N. Kotake, K. Suzuki, S. Asahi, Y. Kanda, Experimental study on the
grinding rate constant of solid materials in a ball mill, Powder Technol. 122 (2002) 101 108.
[14] R.H. Snow, Grinding mill simulation and scale-up of ball mills, in: D.
Wanson, ed., Advances in particle science and technology, Academic
Press, 1973.
[15] M. Hayashi, T. Tanaka, Analysis of the selection function of comminution kinetics, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 5 (1972) 308 310.
[16] T. Tanaka, Funtai-process-nyumon, Kougaku-Toshyo, Tokyo, 1981,
pp. 205 209.
[17] T. Tanaka, Determining the optimum diameter of grinding media used
for ultrafine grinding mechanisms, J. Soc. Powder Technol., Jpn. 31
(1994) 25 31.
[18] Powder Technology Hand Book, 2nd edn., Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1997, pp. 538 539.
[19] N. Kotake, K. Shimodaira, H. Nishihara, Y. Abe, Y. Kanda, Production of submicron particles by ball milling and its evaluation, J. Soc.
Mater. Sci., Jpn. 42 (1993) 1265 1270.