Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Downstream processing of
bio-product
(Chapter 3: Filtration)
Contact:
Mrs. Rozyanti Mohamad
06-551 2077 / 012-652 0389
rozyanti@unikl.edu.my
Learning outcomes
1. Describe and apply the principle of filtration
2. Explain membrane fouling
3. Identify and explain various type of filtration
equipment and process
4. Perform experiment using filtration unit
Introduction
Filtration is a
technique to separates solid and liquid through a solid
support or filter medium
Process description
The liquid to be clarified
is passed through a
porous barrier
Pressure-driven process
Usually involves in early
stages of product
purification
Filtration rate
Area of
filter cloth
Volume of
filtrate
Time
Viscosity of
filtrate
Pressure drop
across the filter
Resistance between
cloth and cake
Reduce liquid
viscosity
Increase filtration
pressure drop
Principle of filtration
Two broad categories based on the direction of the fluid
feed in relation to the filter medium.
Cross flow
Conventional filtration:
Darcys law
Darcys law describe the flow of liquid through a
porous bed of solids:
1 dV
p
=
......Eq(3.1)
A dt o R
R = Rm + Rc ......Eq(3.2)
V
Rc = c ......Eq(3.3)
A
Where,
V
t
A
p
R
Rm
Rc
: volume of filtrate
: time
: cross-sectional area of filter medium
: pressure drop through the filter
medium
: viscosity of filtrate
: resistance (filter medium + solid cake)
: filter medium
: solid cake
: specific cake resistance
: mass of dry cake solid per volume of
filtrate
Conventional filtration:
Darcys law
Combining previous equation will obtain:
p
1 dV
=
......Eq(3.4)
A dt o [ c (V / A) + Rm ]
......Eq(3.5)
+
2p A p
t
V
Plot of V / A vs A
Conventional filtration:
Specific cake resistance
Specific resistance of the cake is directly affected by the
pressure drop across the cake:
= (pc)s Eq(3.6)
where and s are empirical constants
The power s has been called the cake compressibility
factor, range from zero for incompressible cakes such as
sand and diatomite to near unity for highly compressible
cakes.
Conventional filtration:
Washing rate
For products that are recovered in the filtrate, it is
often necessary to wash the filter cake with water or a
salt solution to maximize the recovery yield as
correlated by Choudhury & Dahlstrom:
n
R ' = 1
......Eq(3.7)
100
Where:
R : weight fraction of solute remaining in the cake after washing (R=1.0
prior to washing)
E : percentage wash efficiency (usually between 35-86%)
n : volume of wash liquid per volume of liquid in unwashed cake (n=1.0)
Conventional filtration:
Washing rate
Assume P and during washing and filtration are the
same, washing rate per cross-sectional area is
represented as:
p
1 dV
=
......Eq(3.8)
A dt V =V f o c (V f / A)
dV
Vw = t w
......Eq (3.9)
dt V =V f
Conventional filtration:
Washing rate
From (3.9) we obtain:
Vw
t w p
1 dV
= tw
......Eq (3.10)
=
A
A dt V =V f o c (V f / A)
At the end of filtration process, the equation (3.5),
with neglecting Rm can be written as:
1
2pt f
......Eq (3.11)
=
A o c
Vf
Conventional filtration:
Washing rate
Subtitute (Vf / A) from equation 3.11 into 3.10:
p
Vw
=
A 2 o c t f
t w ......Eq (3.12)
Conventional filtration:
Washing rate
Write tw / tf in terms of (n), the ratio of the volume Vw
of wash liquid to the volume Vr of residual liquid in
cake:
tw
Vw Vr
=2
= 2nf ......Eq (3.14)
tf
Vr V f
Crossflow filtration:
Introduction
Divided into two categories depending on whether the
component being filtered is soluble or insoluble.
Crossflow filtration:
Dissolved species
A solution under pressure flows across the surface of
a membrane fluid is forced through the
membrane.
For a solute that is rejected by the membrane, there
will be a concentration gradient of this solute across
a stagnant boundary layer next to the surface of the
membrane.
Concentration polarization: elevation of the solute
concentration at the membrane surface (cw)
compared to that in the bulk solution (cb).
Crossflow filtration:
Dissolved species
At steady state, the rate of convective mass transfer of solute toward
the membrane surface must be equal to the rate of mass transfer of
solute diffusion away from the membrane surface:
dc
Jc = D ......Eq(3.15)
dx
For boundary layer thickness :
cw
J = ln ......Eq (3.16)
cb
D
Or
cw
J
= exp
......Eq(3.17)
cb
D
where;:
J = transmembrane fluid flux
c = solute concentration
D = diffusion coefficient of solute
= boundry layer thickness
k = mass transfer coefficient
cw/cb = polarization modulus
Crossflow filtration:
Dissolved species
For high Mw solutes (small D) and membrane with
high solvent permeability (high J), concentration
polarization can become severe, with cw/cb >10.
At high cw/cb, the solubility of the solute can be
exceeded, resulting in the precipitation of the solute
and the formation of a solid or gel layer on the
membrane surface.
Crossflow filtration:
Dissolved species
Mass transfer coefficient, k for laminar flow (Re < 1,000 or
2,000):
D
k = 0.816 w
L
3ub
w =
h
For a circular tube
8ub
w =
D
Where:
w : fluid shear rate at the membrane surface
L : length of flow channel over membrane
ub : bulk stream velocity
Crossflow filtration:
Dissolved species
Mass transfer coefficient, k for turbulent flow (Re >2,000 or
4,000):
Dh b
kDh
Where
:
Re
=
and
=
Sc
Sh =
= f (Re, Sc, L Dh )
D
D
Typical correlation for Sherwood number:
Crossflow filtration:
Insoluble species
o Suspended particles form a cake layer (a.k.a gel layer in
ultrafiltration) at the surface of membrane.
o Microfiltration membranes are generally utilized
membranes having pores 0.1m and larger.
o Allow dissolved components pass through but retain
particles above a certain size.
Crossflow filtration:
Insoluble species
Cake layer initially grows with time, thus reducing the permeate
flux.
At steady state conditions, the layer reaches a constant
thickness, which is relatively thin if the shear exerted by the
fluid flowing tangentially to the membrane surface is high
enough.
Crossflow filtration:
Insoluble species
Two different theories developed for particles larger than
1m.
1. Shear-induced diffusion theory for small particle
Particles are randomly displaced from the streamlines in a
shear flow and collide with other particles.
Dominate for particles up to 30 to 40 m in size
The shear induce for 0.2 <<0.45, ( is particle volume
fraction in the bulk suspension):
Ds = 0.3 w 2 Where
yw
: particle radius
: fluid shear rate at membrane surface
Crossflow filtration:
Insoluble species
For laminar flow mass transfer coefficient in concentration
polarization model
k = 0.366 w
L
Crossflow filtration:
Insoluble species
2. Inertial lift for larger particle
Arises when the Re based on the particle size is not negligible.
Produces a velocity that carries particles away from the
membrane surface.
For fast laminar flow of dilute suspensions with thin fouling
layers, the steady state transmembrane flux, J :
J=
0.036 o 3 w2
where
: density of permeate
: viscosity of permeate
: particle radius
w : fluid shear rate at membrane surface
Crossflow filtration:
Insoluble species
The flux strongly dependent on the particle size &
shear rate at the membrane surface.
Flux also not dependent at all on the length of the
filter (L) or on the concentration of particles in the
bulk suspension.
Membrane fouling
Membrane fouling
Fouling results from physical or chemical interactions
between the membrane and various components that
are present in the process stream.
Membrane fouling
It can be divided into reversible and irreversible fouling based on the
attachment strength of particles to the membrane surface.
Reversible fouling can be
removed by a strong shear
force or backwashing.
Membrane fouling :
Mechanisms
Filtration process starts (based on the
diameter of the particles)
1. Pore become narrowing &
constriction
2. Pore plugging
Membrane fouling :
Mechanisms (example)
Flux decrease caused by proteins can be attributed to the
following processes:
Protein adsorption :
Interaction of proteins and
membrane, which occurs without
convective flow through the
membrane
Use
hydrophylic
membrane
Protein accumulation :
Membrane surface exposed to the
flowing process stream as a result of
concentration polarization, which can
lead to formation of a gel layer.
Protein deposition :
Addition of more protein that
is associated with membrane,
over and above the protein
that would be adsorbed in a
non-flowing system.
Increase fluid
shear rate at
filtering surface
Membrane fouling :
Mechanism
The three process can lead to pore narrowing:
o constriction, plugging and solute deposition
Membrane fouling :
Control measures
1) Cleaning
Physically
Biologically
Uses biocides to
remove all viable
microorganisms.
Chemically
Use of acids and
bases to remove
foulants and
impurities.
Membrane fouling :
Control measures
2) Appropriate membrane selection
The nature of the feed water must first be known; then a
membrane that is less prone to fouling with that solution is
chosen. For aqueous filtration, a hydrophilic membrane is
preferred.
3) Choice of operating conditions
For instance, crossflow filtration is always preferred to dead-end
filtration, because turbulence generated during the filtration
entails a thinner deposit layer and therefore minimizes fouling.
Metal fabric
Chemical resistance of
the fabric is a primary
consideration.
Minimal or no
leaching of
components from the
fabric during filtration
Withstand any
chemicals used during
cleaning.
Minimum size of
particles trapped in
woven fabrics is 10
m.
Available in several
types of weave in nickel,
copper, brass,
aluminum, steel,
stainless steel.
Desirable when good
resistance to leaching
and corrosion is
required & at high
temperature operation.
Minimum size of
particles trapped in
woven wire media is 5
m.
Rigid porous
medium
Available in sheets &
tubes.
A wide variety of
materials are available
for rigid porous media,
including sintered
stainless steel and other
metals, silica, porcelain,
and some plastics.
Vent filter
Installed on all equipment that need to be filled or drained such as
product tank.
Hydrophobic asymmetric membrane filters
Rated at 0.22m.
2.
Added
directly to the
feed
Applied to the
filtration
equipment
Perlite
Glassy volcanic material
consisting mainly of aluminum
silicate with some combined
water
Expands on heating during
processing to give highly porous
particles
Used for rough filtration: high
flowrate and less significance is
given to filtrate clarity.
Vacuum
Gravity
Mechanized system to
open and close the
filter press.
Operation:
Drum rotates slowly and is partially
submerged in a slurry reservoir.
Surface of the drum is covered with the
filter medium and a vacuum is maintained
below the medium on the inside of the
drum.
Liquid is sucked through the filter medium
and solids are retained on the filter
medium.
Filtration is followed by cake washing and
dewatering.
Microfiltration
Nanofiltration
Ultrafiltration
Hyperfiltration /
Reverse osmosis
REVERSE OSMOSIS
Process of forcing a solvent from a region of high
solute concentration through a semipermeable
membrane to a region of low solute concentration by
applying a pressure in excess of the osmotic pressure.
Assymetric:
Consist of a number of
layers, each with different
structures and permeability
Composites:
Similar to the asymmetric membrane
but layers of the membrane are made
of different types of material.
Rotating
Tubular
Flat plate
Spiral
wound
Filtration Principles
Direction of feed
flows to the
medium
Conventional
Darcys Law
Crossflow
Dissolves species
(soluble)
Suspended particles
(insoluble)
Woven
fabrics
Metal
fabrics /
screens
Rigid
porous
media
Aid
Sterile
filtration
of
solution
HEPA
Vent
filter
Equipment
Diatomite
Batch
Perlite
Semicontinuous/
continuous
Crossflow
Media /
membrane
Types
Equipment / Module
configuration
Basic structure
Materials
Hollow fiber
Tubular membrane
Ultrafiltration
Homogenous
Polymer
Flat plate
Microfiltration
Nanofiltration
Hyperfiltration /
RO
Asymmetric
Composite
Organic
material
Spiral wound
Rotating type