Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montral, Qubec, Canada H3A 0E8
1
2
Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Abstract
Although gold in high-sulfidation epithermal deposits generally occurs as the native metal or electrum, in
some deposits, a significant proportion of the gold is hosted in pyrite. Here we use a combination of petrography, whole-rock geochemistry, pyrite chemistry, crystallography, and phase stability relationships to
deter- mine how gold was transported and incorporated into pyrite in two relatively young high-sulfidation
epithermal deposits, where the gold occurs almost exclusively in solid solution or as nanoparticles in pyrite.
The genetically related Bawone and Binebase Au (Cu-Ag) deposits, located 1 km apart on the volcanic island
of Sangihe, northeastern Indonesia, are hosted by andesitic volcaniclastic rocks that were altered to a proximal
advanced argillic association of quartz + pyrite (py I) + pyrophyllite + natroalunite + alunite + dickite + kaolinite and a more distal intermediate argillic association of quartz + pyrite (py I) + kaolinite + dickite + illite. The
economic mineralization takes the form of multiple generations of auriferous pyrite, the first of which, pyrite
I (py I), developed during advanced argillic alteration. Mass balance calculations show that all elements were
mobile with the exception of Nb, Ti, some rare earth elements, and possibly Al.
The highest gold concentration is in pyrite II (py II), which occurs in veins that cut pyrite I. This drusy variety of pyrite is characterized by complex growth and sector zoning, and contains as much as 6.0 wt % Cu. The
elevated Cu concentrations correlate positively with Au and As concentrations, whereas the Ag concentration
correlates strongly with Au but not Cu. Later barite-enargite mineralization exploited py II veins and vugs, and
significant concentrations of Ag and Au are hosted by enargite, although the Au concentration in enargite is
lower than in py II or py I.
A model is presented in which the fluid responsible for advanced argillic and intermediate argillic alteration
and associated stage 1 gold mineralization was a condensed magmatic vapor derived from an oxidized magma.
The gold and other metals were transported as hydrated species that ascended through the volcanic pile via
fractures and zones of enhanced permeability to a depth between 900 and 1300 m, where the vapor condensed
at a temperature between 250 and 340C to form an acidic liquid with a pH of ~2.5; fO2 ranged up to four log
units above the hematite-magnetite buffer. Interaction of this liquid with the host andesites caused advanced
argillic and intermediate argillic alteration, including sulfidation of mafic minerals to form py I. During crystallization of py I, Au, Cu and Ag were adsorbed onto the surface of the pyrite and deposited as nanoparticles, or
were incorporated in the pyrite structure. Adsorption of Au, Cu, and Ag from the condensed vapor reached a
peak during the crystallization of vein-hosted py II, and the uptake of Ag and minor Au continued during later
crystallization of enargite. From the distribution of metals among growth and sector zones in py II, incorporation of gold and other metals appears to have been maximized when physicochemical conditions were relatively
stable. This is in contrast to the requirement for native gold precipitation, namely that physicochemical gradients be steep to ensure supersaturation of gold in the ore fluid.
Introduction
Although considerable progress has been made in understanding the formation of high-sulfidation epithermal precious metal deposits, opinion is still divided over the nature
of the ore fluid. There is general agreement that the characteristic residual (vuggy) silica and advanced argillic alteration are the result of interaction of rocks with the condensate
of highly acidic and oxidizing vapors (e.g., HCl, and H2S and
H2SO4 produced by reaction of H2O with SO2) from a proximal magma source (e.g., Hemley and Jones, 1964; Stoffregen
1987; Rye, 1993; Arribas 1995). However, until recently,
most researchers, noting that the ore minerals commonly fill
vugs and therefore postdate the alteration, have concluded
that the fluid responsible for the alteration did not transport
the ore
Corresponding author: e-mail, julia.j.king@gmail.com
*A digital supplement to this paper, containing four Appendices with raw
data, is available at http://economicgeology.org/ and at http://econgeol.geoscienceworld.org/.
0361-0128/14/4246/1705-29
metals (Stoffregen, 1987; White and Hedenquist, 1990; Arribas, 1995; Hedenquist et al., 1998). Instead, these researchers
have attributed the mineralization to collapse of the vapordominated system and transport of the metals by a magmatichydrothermal liquid with a large meteoric water component.
The discovery that gold mineralization in the Pascua deposit,
Chile, was contemporaneous with advanced argillic alteration
(Chouinard et al., 2005a), indicates that for some high-sulfidation epithermal deposits (cf. Voudouris, 2010) the two-stage
hydrothermal model does not apply. This, and a combination of fluid inclusion (Heinrich et al., 1999; Landtwing et
al., 2010) and experimental evidence (Archibald et al., 2001,
2002; Williams-Jones et al., 2002; Zezin et al., 2011b;
Migdisov and Williams-Jones, 2013; Hurtig and WilliamsJones, 2014) showing that gold, silver, and copper may be
considerably more
soluble in aqueous
vapors than
previously suspected, supports a model for these deposits
in which hydrothermal alteration
and economic
mineralization
were both
products of a magmatic
hydrothermal vapor (cf. Williams-Jones and
1705
1706
KING
Heinrich, 2005; Mavrogenes et al., 2010; Berger and Henley,
2011; Henley and Berger, 2011; Scher et al., 2013).
Most studies of high-sulfidation epithermal systems have
focused on deposits in which the gold occurs as a discrete
mineral or minerals (e.g., native gold, electrum, and/or a telluride phase, such as calaverite; Kesler et al., 1981; Stoffregen,
1987; Moritz et al., 2004; Deditius et al., 2008). However, in
some high-sulfidation deposits, notably the Pascua deposit in
Chile, a high proportion of the gold is hosted in sulfide
miner- als, particularly pyrite (e.g., Chouinard et al., 2005b;
Deditius et al., 2009). Here, we report results of a study of
two high- sulfidation epithermal deposits, Bawone (9.5 Mt
of ore with an average grade of 1.32 g/t Au and 3.97 g/t
Ag) and Bine- base (17.9 Mt of ore with an average grade of
0.76 g/t Au and
18.7 g/t Ag), located on Sangihe Island, Indonesia, in which
virtually all the hypogene gold is hosted in pyrite. Most
signifi- cantly, greater than 50% of this gold is in pyrite that
forms part of the early advanced argillic alteration mineral
association; the rest is contained mainly in pyrite veins that
cut the altered rocks. Thus, gold mineralization was both
contemporaneous with and postdated alteration. Based on
this and other obser- vations, we develop a model designed to
explain the genesis of the Bawone and Binebase deposits
involving transport of the metals in a highly acidic vapor and
sorption of the gold onto the surfaces of growing pyrite
crystals. Given the early tim- ing of the Au-Ag mineralization
and the observation that it is hosted almost exclusively by
pyrite, we also propose that these deposits are representatives
of a subclass of high-sulfidation epithermal precious metal
deposits, in which the bulk of the metal is hosted in pyrite
and the ore fluid was a condensed magmatic vapor.
Regional Geologic Setting
The Bawone and Binebase Au (Ag-Cu) deposits are located
in the southern part of Sangihe Island, the largest of the
islands in the 500 km long Sangihe arc, which runs northsouth from southern Mindanao, Philippines, to the north arm
of Sulawesi, and separates the Celebes and Molucca Seas
(Figs. 1, 2; Hall, 2000). The Sangihe arc formed as a result of
the westerly subduction of the Molucca Sea plate under the
Eurasian plate, whereas the facing Halmahera arc was produced by the easterly subduction of the Molucca Sea plate
under the Philippine Sea plate (Morrice et al., 1983; Morrice
and Gill, 1986; Garwin, 1990; Hall, 1996, 2000). Twenty-five
Quaternary stratovolcanoes are located along the length of the
arc; eight of these are active, including Awu at the northern
tip of Sangihe Island (Morrice and Gill, 1986; Fig. 1). Previous studies of volcanism along the Sangihe Arc have shown
that the arc is composed mainly of two-pyroxene and hornblende andesites. Calc-alkaline suites dominate and vary from
low to high K, depending on their distance from the volcanic
front (Morrice and Gill, 1986).
Sangihe Island has a lobate form defined by volcanic centers, the active stratovolcano, Awu, at the northern end and
the dormant/extinct stratovolcanoes, Tahuna and Kakiraeng,
and strongly weathered centers of Taware and Malisang to
the south (Fig. 1). The oldest part of the island is in the
southeast and the youngest in the northwest; new volcanoes
are forming off the northwestern tip and western shores of
Sangihe Island (Beaulieu, 2010). Given the heavy rainfall
(greater than 3 m
ET AL.
1707
340'0"N
Sangihe I.
Awu (1327m)
Kakiraeng (1006m)
335'0"N
Binebase (65m)
Bawone (86m)
Malisang (295m)
325'0"N
330'0"N
Tahuna (697m)
320'0"N
Taware (306m)
10
Km
12540'0"E
12530'0"E
Fig. 1. Inset: Location of Sangihe Island. Digitial elevation model of Sangihe Island showing the locations and elevations
of the active volcano, Awu, dormant and/or extinct volcanic centers (Tahuna, Kakiraeng, Malisang) and the Bawone and
Bine- base deposits. Bathymetry contours are at 50-m intervals.
Tonnes
Au (g/t)
Ag (g/t)
Au (oz)
Ag (oz)
Oxide
Sulfide
3,475,000
5,999,000
1.66
1.12
9.16
0.97
185,464
216,020
205,933
187,089
Binebase Oxide
Sulfide
7,851,000
10,002,000
1.10
0.49
25.13
13.60
277,661
157, 573
6,343,299
4,373,443
Bawone
samples, the andesite contains 5 to 30 vol % white plagioclase laths (2 mm long) and rare, rounded quartz phenocrysts
(2 mm in diameter) in an aphanitic matrix. Conformable layers of welded crystal tuff are locally present in the andesite.
These contain 10 vol % of megascopic crystals of <3-mm-long
plagioclase laths and rare, rounded <3-mm-diameter quartz
grains. This unit is intruded by hypabyssal andesitic porphyry (Fig. 3A). The hypabyssal porphyry contains 20 vol %,
5 mm long, subhedral to euhedral hornblende, magnetite,
biotite and plagioclase phenocrysts, and rare quartz eyes in
an aphanitic matrix. An intrusive breccia with subangular
to subrounded, 1- to 10-cm-diameter fragments of the host
andesite and dacite generally defines the margins of the hyp-
HIGH-SU
KING ET AL.
12535'0"E
12540'0"E
Extinct Volcano
Intrusions
330'0"N
330'0"N
Quaternary Alluvium
Pinterang Formation
Tamako Group
Binebase (65 m)
Batunderang Group
Malisang Group
Bawone (86 m)
Binebase Group
Taware Group
Malisang (295 m)
Taware (306 m)
325'0"N
325'0"N
1708
4
Km
12540'0"E
12535'0"E
Fig. 2. The geology of south Sangihe Island and the location of the Bawone and Binebase deposits, modified from Garwin
(1990).
Soil
Pinterang Formation
Oxide zone
A
BID63
Binebase Group
Andesitic crystal tuff
BID27 BID72
BID11
BOD42
BOD3
BID69
BID16
BID56
BID15
BOD1
BID57
Soil
BID60
BID66
Pinterang Formation
Oxide zone/weathered
Binebase Group
Porphyritic Intrusion
Binebase Group
Andesite porphyry
Andesitic tuff
Dacite
100 m
25 m
100 m
25 m
Fig. 3. Representative lithological cross sections (A) through the Binebase deposit (NW-SE) and (B) through the Bawone
deposit (SW-NE) based on drill holes. The black lines show the locations of the drill holes. Most primary features have been
destroyed in the oxide zone but the original nature of the rock is assumed to have been the same as that of the underlying
bedrock.
1709
B
Mag
Pl
Bt
Hbl
C
D
Kao + Qtz + Al
Py I
Py I + Qtz
Py II
Fig. 4. Photographs of the host rocks of the Bawone and Binebase deposits (cut slabs and core). (A) Argillically altered
flow-banded dacite, the basal unit of the Binebase Group at Bawone, showing phenocrysts and a matrix replaced by kaolinite
and quartz. (B) Plagioclase (Pl)-biotite (Bt), hornblende (Hbl)-magnetite (Mag) andesite porphyry. (C) Vein of py II (brassy)
with fragments of py I (black) in a matrix of vuggy py I with py II occasionally lining vugs. (D) Advanced argillic (alunite =
Al, pyrite = Py, quartz = Qtz) alteration of fragments (light gray) in a matrix of fine-grained quartz and pyrite (dark gray).
The scale bar is 1 cm.
Pinterang Formation (poorly consolidated volcaniclastic sandstones and siltstones, organic-rich siltstones, and calcareous
mudstones) ranges up to 100 m thick and is separated from
the Binebase Group rocks by a thin (several-cm) oxide layer,
possibly a paleosol. The Pinterang Formation is overlain by
an oxidized soil that is up to 4 m thick.
Hydrothermal Alteration
In hand sample, the altered rocks vary from dark gray to
white in color, depending on the pyrite content, and from very
hard (quartz dominated; Fig. 4C) to powdery (clay dominated;
Fig. 4D) in drill core; the latter variation commonly occurs
over intervals of tens of centimeters to tens of meters. Alteration intensity is variable. In some samples, the primary minerals have been completely replaced by secondary minerals,
destroying all primary textures, whereas in other samples, volcanic textures are preserved (Figs. 4D, 5A). The pervasively
altered samples comprise very fine-grained, clay particles
intergrown with fine-grained, generally anhedral, equigranular quartz and pyrite (Fig. 5A, B, D). Less intensely altered
Qtz
Py I
Al
Py I
D
Py II
Py II
Cc
Brt
Py I + Qtz
F
Py II
Sp
El
Ccp
Apy
En
Brt
Brt
Fig. 5. Photomicrographs showing the textures of the altered and mineralized rocks in reflected light (10 m scale bar).
(A) Amphibole phenocrysts replaced by py I in a groundmass replaced by fine-grained quartz, py I, kaolinite dickite.
(B) Fine-grained association of quartz, alunite and py I, typical of argillic alteration. (C) Massive py II and a vug containing
rare chalcocite (Cc) and barite (Brt) crystals. (D) Growth zoned drusy crystals of py II infilling a vug in andesite altered to
fine-grained py I and quartz (blue-grey is epoxy). (E) Fractured and zoned crystals of massive py II cut by a barite-enargite
(En) vein. (F) Sphalerite (Sp), arsenopyrite (Apy), chalcopyrite (Ccp) and electrum (El) crystals in a coarse-grained barite
matrix. The earliest stage of gold-silver mineralization is manifest by fine-grained py I associated with equally fine-grained
quartz and clay minerals (A, B). This was followed by a second generation of Au-Ag mineralization in the form of coarsegrained py II (C, D, E). The third generation of Au-Ag mineralization is represented by barite-enargite (En) veins that commonly contain brecciated py II crystals (E). Rare cm-scale veins of barite containing electrum, sphalerite, arsenopyrite and
chalcopyrite that cut py I and py II mineralization constitute a fourth generation of Au-Ag mineralization observed only in
the Binebase deposit.
1711
1711
A
BID 27
BID 63
BID 16
BID 15
BID 11
BID 72
BID 69
BID 56
BID 57
Overburden and
Pinterang Fm.
AA I (qtz+py+prlnal)
AA II (qtz+pynaldckkao)
BOD 1
AA III (qtz+py+kaoal)
IA I (qtz+kaopy)
BOD 42
BOD 3
BID 60
BID 66
100 m
25 m
100 m
25 m
Fig. 6. Representative cross section (A) NW-SE through the Binebase (BID) deposit and (B) SW-NE through the
Bawone (BOD) deposit showing the distribution of hypogene alteration facies established using X-ray diffraction analysis and
core log- ging. The locations of drill holes are indicated by the black lines. Abbreviations: alunite = al, dickite = dck, illite =
ill, kaolinite
= kao, natroalunite = nal, pyrite = py, pyrophyllite = prl, quartz = qtz.
blanket of intermediate argillic I alteration with several subvertical roots that pass downward and laterally into intermediate argillic II alteration (Fig. 6B).
Hypogene Mineralization
Neither free gold nor electrum is observed in the hypogene zone of the Bawone deposit and very rarely in the Binebase deposit. Instead, the hypogene gold in both deposits is
invisible, i.e., hosted almost exclusively by pyrite. Silver is
also invisible, hosted by both pyrite and enargite, and copper occurs mainly in pyrite and enargite (volumetrically much
less abundant than pyrite), as well as rare grains of chalcocite
in vugs (Fig. 5C). Gold (-silver) mineralization occurred in
three stages: (1) an early stage of disseminated Au-Agbearing pyrite during advanced argillic and intermediate argillic
(minor) alteration (pyrite I; Figs. 5A, B, D, 7B), (2) an intermediate stage characterized by multiple generations of lenses,
veins and breccias containing subhedral to euhedral, drusy,
and massive to semimassive Au-Ag-Cu-bearing pyrite II (py
II; Figs. 5C-E, 7A, C), and (3) late-stage barite-enargitepyrite II veins (Figs. 5C, E, 7C). At Binebase, there is a fourth
stage in the form of rare barite, base-metal sulfide, and electrum veins (Figs. 5F, 7D).
The earliest gold occurs in py I, which is an ubiquitous
alteration product intergrown with quartz and hydrous alumina-rich phases and occurs as small (230 m diameter),
isotropic, anhedral grains, accounting for 2 to 20 vol % of the
rock; the gold grade corresponds to the proportion of pyrite
in the rock. As part of the advanced argillic alteration and to
a much lesser extent the intermediate argillic alteration, this
stage of mineralization was focused along vertical structures
and spread out laterally near the top of the deposit where
fluids were confined by less-permeable strata or paleo-water
tables. At the Bawone deposit, advanced argillic I alteration is
also concentrated in a subhorizontal zone below an impermeable andesitic tuff about 75 m below the base of the Pinterang
formation (Figs. 3A, 6A).
The second stage of gold mineralization is characterized
by veins, veinlets, blebs, breccias, lenses, and massive bodies
of coarse-grained, brassy py II, which overprinted advanced
argillic alteration and intermediate argillic I alteration,
exploited the secondary porosity created during alteration,
Qtz + Al
Py II
Py I
Brt
D
Brt
Py II
En
Brt
Ccp
El
Fig. 7. BSE images of auriferous pyrite, py I and py II, and later generations of mineralization. The scale bar is 100 m
unless otherwise indicated. (A) Fragment of drusy py II exhibiting strong growth zoning in a barite (Brt) vein. (B) Disseminated PyI in a matrix of quartz (Qtz) and alunite (Al). (C) Barite-enargite (En) vein with m-scale, homogeneous subhedraleuhedral enargite crystals intergrown with mm-scale subhedral barite surrounding fragments of py II. (D) Electrum (El)
grain surrounded by subhedral chalcopyrite (Ccp), barite (Brt), and sphalerite (Sp) (10 m scale bar).
Au
Ag Cu
As
Sb
40
Depth (m)
60
80
3000
20
10
20
0
2000
50
00
10
00
250
50
Concentration (ppm)
Fig. 8. The concentrations of Au, Ag, Cu, As, and Sb (ppm) in a drill hole
from the Bawone deposit (BOD1); Pb and Zn concentrations were below the
detection limit and Mo and Ba were not analyzed.
d.l.
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
P2O5
Total
LOI
IA I
BOD1-134.5
IA I
BOD3-158.8
IA I
BOD3-85.4
IA I
BOD3-74.1
IA I
BOD3-106.4
IA I
BOD3-83.3
IA I/BaEn
BOD3-99.2
IA I/BaEn
BOD3-96.8
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
0.01
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
55.4
0.546
19.8
4.26
0.008
0.75
0.78
0.35
2.17
0.1
98.53
14.36
64.68
0.547
14.36
8.38
0.009
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.08
100.1
11.82
8.2
0.036
0.33
35.08
0.005
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.02
b.d.
66.75
23.02
58.66
0.528
9.13
13.45
0.006
0.01
0.06
0.56
0.69
0.06
99.83
16.69
51.41
0.484
2.91
27.98
0.007
0.02
0.05
0.06
0.02
0.04
100.3
17.33
48.19
0.541
2.85
30.09
0.006
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.04
0.05
100.3
18.38
19.69
0.185
0.3
40.04
0.006
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
b.d.
82.61
22.25
85.78
0.501
2.34
6.14
0.006
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.08
99.49
4.49
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Y
Yb
Lu
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.5
0.01
0.002
15.8
32.1
3.83
14
2.66
0.791
2.18
0.36
2.19
0.45
1.41
0.237
12.8
1.78
0.31
8.91
16.5
1.94
8
1.64
0.596
1.2
0.14
0.72
0.15
0.52
0.103
4
0.72
0.119
11
7.29
0.49
1.21
0.34
b.d.
1.51
0.04
0.09
0.02
0.09
0.014
1.3
0.08
0.012
5.52
8.67
0.96
3.95
0.81
0.197
0.61
0.13
0.76
0.19
0.75
0.157
5.6
1.02
0.173
5.38
8.77
1.17
4.15
0.78
0.155
0.57
0.08
0.42
0.09
0.43
0.08
3
0.61
0.101
6.03
10
1.33
4.67
0.84
0.185
0.58
0.09
0.44
0.08
0.39
0.067
2.8
0.52
0.091
8.38
8.03
0.79
2.55
0.61
0.472
1.02
0.1
0.28
0.07
0.23
0.042
2.5
0.31
0.053
13.9
26
2.97
12.1
2.31
0.649
1.49
0.16
0.89
0.16
0.73
0.146
5.2
1.03
0.174
Ag
As
Au
Ba
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppb)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
Bi
Co
Cr
Cs
Cu
Ga
Ge
Hf
In
Mo
Nb
Ni
Pb
Rb
Sb
Sc
Sn
Sr
Ta
Th
Tl
U
V
W
Zn
Zr
0.5
5
2
3
0.1
1
20
0.1
10
1
0.5
0.1
0.1
2
0.2
20
5
1
0.2
1
1
2
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
5
0.5
30
1
b.d.
487
b.d.
327
b.d.
13
b.d.
0.5
40
18
1.8
2.2
b.d.
b.d.
6.4
b.d.
8
36
b.d.
11
b.d.
248
0.35
2.79
2.28
1.02
128
b.d.
1,060
81
0.5
64
306
129
8.4
10
b.d.
b.d.
170
28
2.8
1.8
b.d.
5
2.2
b.d.
49
b.d.
2.8
13
b.d.
702
0.18
1.53
1.34
0.59
158
4.1
140
78
11.5
1,350
1,500
178,900
26.7
47
b.d.
0.2
4,550
4
0.6
0.2
0.4
28
1.1
b.d.
174
b.d.
112
b.d.
15
1,484
0.06
0.5
4.56
0.14
8
19.2
b.d.
6
b.d.
124
751
6,822
0.6
23
b.d.
b.d.
1,780
7
b.d.
2.4
b.d.
4
2.7
b.d.
12
1
10
9
b.d.
477
0.18
1.51
0.68
0.47
80
4
1,030
86
0.8
66
1,110
3,050
1
108
30
0.2
490
10
b.d.
2
b.d.
12
2.6
30
38
3
2.5
7
1
298
0.2
1.19
1.31
0.87
46
4.4
360
75
0.7
22
1,190
4,094
1.4
112
30
b.d.
2,590
7
b.d.
1.6
b.d.
6
2.7
30
25
b.d.
b.d.
5
b.d.
310
0.15
1.96
0.48
0.55
39
9.9
100
58
3.9
1,180
2,000
98,830
3.6
104
60
0.3
4,540
3
0.5
0.8
0.2
14
1.3
40
57
2
70.5
3
5
772
0.08
0.5
0.16
0.38
11
2.6
b.d.
30
b.d.
19
723
212
5
18
b.d.
b.d.
270
8
1.2
3.1
0.1
13
2.3
b.d.
18
b.d.
4.8
10
b.d.
515
0.21
2.05
0.36
1.68
33
6.4
320
144
AA I
BOD3-55
AA I
BOD3-85.5
56.29
0.53
13.22
8.23
0.009
0.01
0.08
0.76
1.35
0.12
99.58
18.98
43.28
0.373
6.17
15.17
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.42
0.47
0.04
84.1
18.11
42.65
0.492
3.28
32.38
0.007
0.02
0.04
0.15
0.15
0.04
99.82
20.61
8.79
16.3
1.92
7.94
1.49
0.442
1.13
0.18
1.04
0.25
0.86
0.174
6.6
1.16
0.189
9.01
14.8
1.96
7.17
1.56
0.349
1.55
0.16
0.69
0.15
0.56
0.101
5.2
0.78
0.13
4.95
8.42
1.14
3.91
0.75
0.176
0.53
0.07
0.39
0.08
0.35
0.065
2.5
0.45
0.085
b.d.
38
166
779
b.d.
10
20
b.d.
AA I
BOD3-48.6
AA I
BOD3-100
AA I
BOD3-78.7
48.8
0.492
10.38
17.76
0.007
b.d.
0.06
0.48
0.71
0.1
99.86
21.06
29.11
0.377
0.26
46.64
0.009
0.02
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.02
100.1
23.58
8.74
0.22
1.25
59.44
0.014
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.02
0.02
100.8
31.01
63.84
0.43
7.59
10.06
0.005
0.01
0.06
0.84
0.81
0.08
99.15
15.42
49.79
0.46
10.59
16.73
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.38
0.36
0.12
97.66
19.13
51.37
0.474
11.21
12.06
0.003
b.d.
0.07
0.92
1.21
0.08
97.92
20.52
53.65
0.603
12.29
12.72
0.008
0.02
0.12
0.71
0.71
0.2
100
19
20.65
0.684
19.21
30.85
0.012
0.03
0.07
0.17
0.18
0.22
99.21
27.12
7.79
14
1.62
6.71
1.36
0.377
0.98
0.16
0.82
0.19
0.73
0.148
5.5
1.04
0.177
2.93
4.48
0.57
2
0.37
0.086
0.27
0.04
0.26
0.08
0.3
0.057
2.1
0.46
0.075
2.58
3.36
0.41
1.35
0.26
0.058
0.2
0.03
0.16
0.03
0.14
0.026
1.1
0.17
0.029
6.53
11.5
1.63
5.76
1.13
0.318
0.82
0.14
0.75
0.15
0.66
0.134
4.5
0.9
0.154
8.76
17
2.08
8.38
1.8
0.453
1.23
0.15
0.77
0.16
0.56
0.104
4
0.84
0.162
7.62
13.9
1.61
6.79
1.43
0.425
1.15
0.15
0.85
0.17
0.62
0.122
5.2
0.84
0.137
10.8
20.5
2.43
10.4
2.33
0.689
2.15
0.31
1.69
0.36
1.21
0.237
10.4
1.64
0.274
8.29
15.5
2.06
7.02
1.25
0.319
0.87
0.13
0.71
0.16
0.59
0.115
4
0.83
0.138
0.6
b.d.
b.d.
2.3
2.2
314
14
20
167
36
666
1,470
580
1,710
1,690
95,970
1,990
1,344
1,473
511
b.d.
0.3
b.d.
5.6
1.7
22
115
10
157
188
50
b.d.
b.d.
20
20
0.1
b.d.
b.d.
0.2
b.d.
230
1,550
1,450
1,010
2,870
2,010
18
19
7
32
1
3
0.8
b.d.
b.d.
b.d.
b.d.
b.d.
2.5
1.9
1.5
2
2.4
0.6
b.d.
0.2
b.d.
b.d.
0.1
b.d.
b.d.
3
4
b.d.
21
29
2.6
2
2.6
2.2
1.9
1
b.d.
b.d.
30
b.d.
40
60
23
b.d.
47
62
84
15
b.d.
2
1
2
b.d.
1
1
6.5
b.d.
b.d.
11.5
9.3
13
8
6
13
5
2
b.d.
b.d.
b.d.
b.d.
2
b.d.
669
564
310
592
60
83
0.2
0.14
0.14
0.12
0.14
0.06
1.61
1.3
1.08
1.38
0.72
0.31
0.72
0.33
0.75
4.03
0.61
0.82
0.51
0.45
0.79
0.68
0.77
0.35
132
73
42
148
21
32
3.3
1.6
20.3
0.8
1.7
6.1
430
260
360
460
80
50
95
68
59
70
87
18
AA I/BaEn
AA II
AA II
BOD3-113.7 BOD42-62.3 BOD3-125.4
0.6
8
287
370
0.1
25
30
b.d.
490
11
b.d.
2.2
0.1
3
2.1
b.d.
14
b.d.
0.8
8
b.d.
455
0.14
1.05
0.6
0.56
88
46
270
69
1
74
487
1,865
3.2
9
b.d.
0.3
410
10
0.9
2
b.d.
2
2.1
b.d.
354
2
2.1
11
5
641
0.15
1.24
2.7
0.57
94
0.5
120
65
b.d.
28
300
688
1.1
28
b.d.
b.d.
350
10
0.6
1.7
0.2
2
2
b.d.
14
b.d.
1.3
10
1
532
0.15
1.25
1.15
0.54
109
6.4
500
75
AA II
BOD3-46.9
AA II
BOD3-34.4
b.d.
1.9
56
141
396
1,390
1,458
1,736
0.2
0.7
12
28
b.d.
30
b.d.
0.2
710
1,460
48
58
b.d.
b.d.
2.8
3.3
b.d.
b.d.
4
9
3
2.9
b.d.
30
30
46
1
1
1.9
8.7
13
28
b.d.
4
931
1,717
0.19
0.21
1.78
2.41
2.52
4.41
0.63
1.25
174
259
7.9
2.2
1,070
290
98
99
1716
1716
Table 2.
Porphyry
AA II
BOD3-27.3
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
P2O5
Total
LOI
AA II
BOD3-79.5
AA II
BOD3-132.9
AA II
BOD3-41
AA II
BOD3-65.4
AA II/BaEn
BOD3-65.8
AA III
BOD1-115
AA III
BOD1-124.9
AA III
BOD3-122.6
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
7.08
1.029
24.05
19.86
0.005
0.03
0.12
1.22
3.49
0.43
98.86
41.55
65.52
0.485
6.24
14.38
0.006
b.d.
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.1
98.17
11.31
59.09
0.624
16.11
7.88
0.016
0.02
0.08
0.23
0.17
0.18
98.46
14.06
39.59
0.567
3.97
32.64
0.017
0.02
0.07
0.16
0.21
0.13
99.66
22.28
56.91
0.431
5.67
18.17
0.005
0.02
0.08
0.43
0.42
0.11
100
17.79
17.64
0.082
0.81
31.27
0.003
0.02
0.04
0.06
b.d.
b.d.
77.25
22.94
59.72
0.61
16.49
7.98
0.014
0.02
0.11
0.07
0.03
0.21
98.39
13.13
61.62
0.773
16.96
5.73
0.022
0.03
0.1
0.14
0.03
0.11
99.98
14.47
39.9
0.298
3.6
32.09
0.006
0.02
0.04
0.31
0.29
0.04
98.21
21.62
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Y
Yb
Lu
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
16.8
31.1
3.44
13.5
2.4
0.496
1.53
0.19
0.95
0.2
0.71
0.14
5.3
1.06
0.183
8.97
15.8
2.12
7.48
1.34
0.368
0.88
0.12
0.65
0.13
0.6
0.123
4.2
0.9
0.15
11.4
22.1
2.59
11.2
2.45
0.854
1.96
0.24
1.23
0.26
0.99
0.184
6.9
1.35
0.218
10.4
19.4
2.68
9.94
2.19
0.68
1.77
0.22
1.14
0.22
0.83
0.144
6.6
1.02
0.164
8.48
15.4
2.08
7.45
1.4
0.415
1
0.15
0.77
0.18
0.74
0.151
5.1
1.07
0.174
6.84
5.76
0.53
1.48
0.35
0.18
0.76
0.05
0.17
0.03
0.13
0.022
1.7
0.16
0.028
12.1
24.7
2.84
12
2.44
0.616
1.59
0.2
1.04
0.23
0.78
0.142
6.2
1.17
0.23
9.83
17.9
2.1
8.17
1.56
0.784
1.19
0.2
1.25
0.28
0.99
0.18
7.1
1.42
0.28
3.87
5.81
0.71
2.53
0.53
0.181
0.49
0.06
0.28
0.06
0.24
0.044
1.8
0.31
0.055
Ag
As
Au
Ba
Bi
Co
Cr
Cs
Cu
Ga
Ge
Hf
In
Mo
Nb
Ni
Pb
Rb
Sb
Sc
Sn
Sr
Ta
Th
Tl
U
V
W
Zn
Zr
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
3.2
55
1,240
1,546
1.2
17
40
0.1
640
184
b.d.
4
0.2
12
4.2
20
149
2
8.8
35
5
2,840
0.3
3.8
3.81
5.45
410
5.3
310
141
b.d.
106
717
2,354
b.d.
53
30
b.d.
1,440
13
1.7
3.6
b.d.
18
2.4
20
b.d.
b.d.
34.4
10
3
682
0.21
1.66
0.93
1.91
69
2.1
40
109
b.d.
104
345
1,517
1.5
11
20
b.d.
180
18
0.7
2.1
b.d.
15
2.6
b.d.
17
b.d.
2.1
14
b.d.
1,060
0.2
1.85
1.53
1.45
157
0.8
120
95
1.6
442
1,310
2,519
0.7
25
30
b.d.
3,500
24
0.6
2.1
b.d.
11
2.2
30
11
1
35.6
10
6
655
0.17
1.52
0.49
0.84
91
3.4
70
55
2.8
311
1,080
4,145
0.3
26
30
b.d.
2,720
19
1.2
2.2
0.1
5
2.2
b.d.
181
1
24.6
9
4
571
0.16
1.33
4.59
0.51
59
12.9
300
73
3.7
2,500
1,280
106,900
0.3
54
30
b.d.
15,000
6
1.2
0.3
0.2
21
0.6
20
b.d.
1
120
2
6
1,109
0.04
0.32
0.07
0.25
17
1.6
190
9
b.d.
60
273
802
0.4
8
30
b.d.
70
13
3.7
2.4
b.d.
58
4.2
b.d.
74
b.d.
4.5
14
4
685
0.19
1.83
1.21
0.67
120
b.d.
360
89
1.1
125
130
1,609
1
10
20
0.3
90
19
2.1
2.8
b.d.
49
2.9
b.d.
120
b.d.
10.4
23
2
295
0.2
1.93
3.13
12.6
199
b.d.
960
101
4.5
242
1,760
13,280
0.6
111
30
0.3
2,470
8
0.6
1.1
0.1
38
1.5
50
28
2
27.7
5
3
411
0.1
0.52
0.4
0.4
36
2.5
b.d.
36
Note: The sample name indicates the drill hole number and the depth; samples are organized by lithology (porphyry or crystal tuff) and alteration-type
(IA = intermediate argillic, BaEn = barite-enargite veins, AA = advanced argillic; see text for description), identified based on petrographic observations,
bulk rock geochemistry and/or X-ray diffraction analyses
(Cont.)
Crystal Tuff
Least altered
IA I
PANTAI
BID70-61.7
58.37
0.546
15.2
63.89
0.627
11.62
IA I
BID39-41.2
65.1
0.706
12.71
IA II
IA II
IA II
IA II
IA II
IA II
BID43-39.5 BID26-102.5 BID15-84.2 BID18-144.5 BID18-183.2 BID23-68.6
29.58
1.423
26.73
66.18
0.587
12.6
60.58
0.68
14.96
58.02
0.771
16.24
56.54
0.796
17.84
56.83
0.852
18.21
IA II
BID26-58
56.02
0.667
15.5
47.52
0.902
19.49
5.59
0.132
2.86
7.02
2.79
1.1
0.2
99.55
5.74
9.89
0.005
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.26
0.15
98.27
11.69
8.13
0.005
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.16
98.77
11.81
18.12
0.004
0.06
0.11
0.07
0.05
0.43
98.61
22.04
5.45
0.017
0.99
0.33
0.04
3.55
0.16
99.88
9.97
6.7
0.023
1.04
0.38
0.03
3.79
0.17
99.07
10.72
7.15
0.018
0.96
0.14
0.07
4.29
0.15
99.25
11.44
6.92
0.015
1.86
0.45
0.06
2.12
0.23
98.31
11.47
6.79
0.027
0.84
0.8
0.06
2.41
0.2
99.5
12.49
6.86
0.019
1.15
0.57
0.06
4.17
0.14
100.5
15.38
6.34
0.025
0.68
0.62
0.09
6.09
0.23
98.29
16.31
12.5
24.6
3.13
12.8
2.96
1.03
2.89
0.48
2.87
0.6
1.81
0.283
6.6
1.97
0.331
7.53
14.6
1.52
6.08
1.05
0.352
0.73
0.12
0.81
0.21
0.75
0.136
6.1
1.09
0.205
9.05
18.6
2.13
8.82
1.88
0.595
1.36
0.17
0.86
0.19
0.71
0.135
5.5
1.1
0.209
10.5
16.1
1.35
3.57
0.39
0.2
0.32
0.05
0.32
0.09
0.37
0.079
2.4
0.75
0.173
6.12
11.7
1.46
6.05
1.98
0.581
2.46
0.46
2.94
0.61
1.79
0.277
17.7
1.92
0.322
6.04
13.5
1.69
7.94
2.51
0.84
3.12
0.57
3.59
0.73
2.19
0.344
21.7
2.4
0.411
8.04
18.3
2.52
11.1
2.98
0.858
3.11
0.55
3.39
0.69
2.04
0.324
19.2
2.39
0.435
10.3
21.5
2.83
12.2
3.37
0.947
3.49
0.58
3.58
0.77
2.38
0.37
21.6
2.62
0.445
10.5
21.7
2.93
12.4
3.36
1.09
3.58
0.63
3.9
0.81
2.36
0.379
22.2
2.67
0.466
11.9
23.3
3.04
12.6
2.91
0.891
2.97
0.52
3.28
0.68
2.04
0.319
19.2
2.25
0.374
12.7
25.6
3.33
14.1
3.51
1.1
3.74
0.65
4.01
0.82
2.42
0.382
22.4
2.64
0.452
b.d.
b.d.
b.d.
181
b.d.
14
20
1.5
30
14
1.5
2.3
b.d.
b.d.
2.7
b.d.
b.d.
21
b.d.
18
b.d.
367
0.17
1.83
0.1
0.77
171
2.4
130
IA I
BID24-101
60
89
0.6
10
57
664
0.4
8
b.d.
b.d.
200
8
1.4
2.1
b.d.
b.d.
2.7
b.d.
15
4
1.7
14
3
1,040
0.15
1.22
0.38
0.38
120
0.8
b.d.
72
b.d.
19
66
107
0.5
21
b.d.
b.d.
100
12
1.7
2.2
b.d.
10
2.4
b.d.
25
b.d.
b.d.
14
3
688
0.17
1.03
0.75
0.91
123
0.8
80
80
1.9
25
391
1,837
4.2
80
200
0.3
490
16
2
4.2
b.d.
19
4.9
30
55
3
4.1
18
11
3,854
0.3
1.73
0.39
0.59
222
2.4
b.d.
12.7
204
317
8,105
b.d.
16
20
1.1
160
14
0.8
1.9
b.d.
16
2.1
b.d.
1,080
79
12.7
21
2
184
0.13
1.29
4.04
5.01
178
3.6
3,450
67
6.5
43
27
2,045
b.d.
14
b.d.
2
40
14
0.6
2.2
b.d.
3
2.3
b.d.
44
82
9.7
26
b.d.
73
0.14
1.23
0.9
0.74
201
5.6
320
76
3.2
15
54
1,381
b.d.
14
b.d.
1.7
50
15
0.5
2.4
b.d.
b.d.
2.8
b.d.
54
93
1.8
29
b.d.
59
0.16
1.63
1.07
0.61
248
8.7
300
82
b.d.
9
21
130
b.d.
21
20
1.2
60
16
1.5
2.6
b.d.
3
2.7
b.d.
10
42
b.d.
25
b.d.
23
0.15
1.59
0.35
0.52
245
2
70
92
b.d.
10
13
139
b.d.
21
b.d.
1.3
80
17
1.7
2.4
b.d.
b.d.
3.1
b.d.
23
52
6.7
32
b.d.
47
0.16
5.43
0.28
1.84
285
1.3
320
85
b.d.
94
b.d.
749
b.d.
16
b.d.
3
60
15
0.7
2
b.d.
b.d.
2.3
b.d.
30
80
11.5
25
b.d.
54
0.12
1.31
3.85
0.6
221
b.d.
350
70
b.d.
118
b.d.
744
b.d.
18
b.d.
4.4
70
19
0.8
2.7
b.d.
b.d.
3.3
b.d.
b.d.
105
9.7
32
b.d.
61
0.18
1.85
2.83
0.65
283
b.d.
470
100
the compositions of the altered rocks to those of their leastaltered equivalents. This was done by making binary plots of
the data, and determining which element pairs were linearly
distributed, as such a distribution would correspond to a relatively constant mass ratio for the elements and could indicate
that they were immobile (e.g., MacLean and Kranidiotis,
1987; Warren et al., 2007; Agrawal et al., 2008). These plots
show that concentrations of pairs of the following elements,
Zr, Ti, Nb, Hf, and Ta, form linear arrays. However,
because Ti, Nb, and Ta are not incorporated into the same
minerals as Zr and Hf (Ti, Nb, and Ta occur in rutile and Zr
and Hf in zir- con), the linear variation of Zr with Ti was taken
as evidence of immobility (Fig. 9). Assuming that Zr and Ti
were immobile, the concentration of these elements in each
altered sample was normalized to their concentration in a
least altered sam- ple for each rock type using the method of
Grant (1986). To scale the changes for each element
proportionally so that the mass change for an unaltered rock
is zero, the concentration of each element was multiplied by
the ratio of the immobile element concentrations (Zr and Ti)
in the fresh rock to that in the altered rock. Values less than
unity indicate losses of ele- ments relative to their
concentrations in the unaltered rock, and values greater than
unity indicate gains (Fig. 10).
Three distinct patterns of relative gains and losses are
observed for advanced argillic alteration (the small size
of the data set precluded separate treatment of advanced
argillic I, II, and III alteration) and intermediate argillic I
(Bawone and Binebase) and II (Binebase) alteration (Fig.
10). As expected from the mineralogy, the advanced argillic
and intermediate argillic I samples were strongly depleted
in the major elements, Mn, Mg, Ca, and Na, moderately
depleted or unchanged in K, weakly depleted in Al and P,
and relatively undepleted in Si. Somewhat unexpectedly,
however, these samples appear to be enriched in Fe. As py II
1.6
BOD
BID
Least Altered
TiO2 (wt. %)
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
40
80
120
160
Zr (ppm)
Fig. 9. Plot showing the distribution of TiO2 and Zr in variably altered
rocks of the Bawone (BOD) and Binebase (BID) deposits. See the text for an
interpretation of the significance of these data. The Pearson correlation coefficient for both deposits (r) = 0.80.
commonly occurs in the form of blebs that filled pores created by advanced argillic and intermediate argillic I alteration (and thus postdated this alteration), we suspect that most
if not all of the apparent enrichment in Fe is an artifact due
to unavoidable inclusion of py II in the samples analyzed to
represent this alteration. The intermediate argillic alteration II samples were also depleted in Mn, Mg, Ca, P, and
particularly in Na, but appear to have conserved Al, Si, and
Fe. In contrast to advanced argillic and intermediate argillic
I alteration, these samples are strongly enriched in K. The
overall distribution of trace metals and semimetals (Au, Cu,
As, Ag, Cr, Co, Ni, Zn, Mo, Sn, Sb, Tl, W, and Pb)
indicates that they were added during all stages of alteration,
albeit in variable quantities (it should be noted that because
of the py II problem referred to above, the additions of Cu
and Au for advanced argillic and intermediate argillic I
alteration may be overestimated). However, whereas Rb and
Cs were depleted (or unchanged) and Sr added during
advanced argillic and intermediate argillic I alteration, the
opposite occurred dur- ing intermediate
argillic II
alteration, i.e., Sr was depleted and Rb and Cs enriched
(Fig. 10).
Both the advanced argillic and intermediate argillic I
altered rocks underwent substantial mass losses in all REEs,
with the degree of depletion increasing progressively with
atomic number from La to Dy and then decreasing progressively to Lu (Fig. 10). In contrast to advanced argillic and
intermediate argillic I alteration, the depletion of REEs during intermediate argillic II alteration was greatest for La and
decreased with atomic number to Gd with the exception of
Eu. We consider that the very small additions of the heavy
rare earth elements (HREEs: Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu)
reflect uncertainties in the mass transfer calculations and that
these elements were immobile during alteration. The preferential leaching of the light rare earth elements (LREEs: La,
Ce, Pr, Nd) during intermediate argillic II alteration is consistent with results of experiments showing that the LREEs
are more mobile in chloride-bearing hydrothermal fluids than
the HREEs (Migdisov et al., 2009). The reason for the preferential depletion of Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho during advanced
argillic and intermediate argillic I alteration is unclear. A
pos- sible explanation for this anomalous behavior is that
depletion of the LREEs was inhibited because of their
incorporation by sulfates and clay minerals (e.g., Miller et
al., 1982; Hopf,
1993; Fulignati et al., 1999; Karakaya, 2009), and that without this uptake they would have been more depleted, consistent with the experimental predictions (Migdisov et al.,
2009). The differential behavior of the REEs reported above
supports observations from active hydrothermal systems that
REE chemistry offers a useful tool for distinguishing alteration types (e.g., Michard, 1989; Fulignati et al., 1998, 1999;
Lottermoser, 1992; Lewis et al., 1997; Salan et al., 2011).
Ore mineral composition
The compositions of pyrite and enargite were analyzed
using a combination of electron microprobe (EMP) and laser
ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LAICP-MS). Quantitative electron microprobe analyses for Fe, S,
Cu, As, Sb, Co, Ni, Zn, Se, and Te were conducted on carboncoated samples at McGill University using a JEOL 8900
instru- ment equipped with five wavelength dispersive
spectrometers
Fe 2O3
K2 O
La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu
10
1
Ag Au
P2 O5
Na2 O
MgO
100
0.1
10
Fe 2O 3
1000
100
Sr
La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu
Cs
0.1
Rb
MgO
CaO
MnO
0.01
1
Ag Au
Na2O
10
K 2O P 2O5
3
2
SiO2
10
0.1
0.1
10
K2 O
1000
10
1
0.1
Au Ag Cu As Sn
CaO
P2 O 5
100
1
Na2O
0.01
MgO
0.1
MnO
Fe 2O3
10
Al2O 3 SiO2
Intermediate Argillic II
1000
0.1
Al O
Intermediate Argillic I
0.01
CaO
MnO
0.1
SiO2
10
1
Al2O 3
Advanced Argillic
10
La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu
0.1
Fig. 10. Relative gains and losses of elements for advanced argillically altered rocks from Bawone (red), intermediate
argillically altered I porphyry and crystal tuffs from Bawone and Binebase (yellow) and intermediate argillically II altered
(purple) crystal tuffs from Binebase, calculated using the method of Grant (1986). A value of 1 indicates immobility, less
than
1 indicates a relative mass loss and greater than 1 indicates a relative mass gain.
Ag are 1.0 ppm (IQR = 0.61.5 ppm) and 9.1 ppm (IQR =
1.129.6 ppm), respectively. Somewhat surprisingly, the concentrations of Se and Te, elements that with As are commonly
elevated in auriferous pyrite (e.g., Fleet et al., 1993; Reich et
al., 2005), are relatively low with median values of 9.6 ppm
(IQR = 6.141.1 ppm) and 3.8 ppm (IQR = 2.210 ppm),
respectively (Table 3).
The concentrations of all trace elements detected in py I
are higher in py II. The median concentration of Cu in py II
is 1.1 wt % (IQR = 0.423.4 wt %) and the maximum concentration 6.0 wt % (EMP Analysis, Table A1). The median concentration of Co in py II is 148 ppm (IQR = 48.4533 ppm),
that of Pb is 69.9 ppm (IQR = 2.7557 ppm) and that of As
is
118 ppm (IQR = 16.1417 ppm). Unlike py I, the concentration of Te is relatively high, with a median value of 31.3 ppm
(IQR = 11143 ppm) and that of Se is significant, with a
median of 25.9 ppm (IQR = 12.8102 ppm). The maximum
Au concentration in py II is 13.6 ppm, and the median, 2.4
ppm (IQR = 0.93.2 ppm), and the Ag maximum
concentration is
1,273 ppm, and the median, 3.7 ppm (IQR = 1.419 ppm).
Although the concentrations of the trace elements, on average, are lower in py I than in py II, the interelement associations are similar. Binary plots (Fig. 11) and element maps
(Fig. 12) show that high Au concentrations in py I and II are
generally associated with elevated Cu, As, Ag, and Te, but
Au concentration may be high even if concentrations of
these elements are relatively low; this is especially true for
Ag and Te. Gold concentration
is almost entirely
independent of Se concentration and shows no correlation
with Co (or Ni, Sb, Zn, Pb, and Bi, which are not shown)
concentration. The inter-element correlations for Ag are
similar to those for gold, except that Ag and Te are negatively
correlated.
As mentioned above, py II is complexly compositionally
zoned and py I is unzoned. The backscatter electron images
indicate that this zonation reflects differences in concentrations of trace elements, mainly of Cu (Fig. 7A). Compositional
As
(ppm)
Au
(ppm)
Bi
(ppm)
Co
(ppm)
Cu
(wt %)
Fe
(wt %)
Ni
(ppm)
Pb
(ppm)
S
(wt %)
Sb
(ppm)
Se
(ppm)
Py I
Mean
Median
Min
Max
1st quartile
3rd quartile
33.0
9.1
0.3
145.8
1.1
29.6
95.4
43.9
2.3
467.3
15.6
83.0
1.1
1.0
d.l.
2.5
0.6
1.5
10.1
3.9
0.1
47.9
1.0
13.3
117.1
62.5
0.1
404.3
15.6
206.1
0.4
0.3
d.l.
1.5
0.2
0.6
59.7
58.4
52.3
71.7
53.1
62.5
43.1
33.7
0.5
182.9
14.2
49.9
55.3
59.6
0.5
199.8
9.5
79.7
53.3
53.4
51.7
54.6
53.4
53.4
3.7
3.7
0.3
11.0
0.8
4.3
31.8
9.6
1.2
118.6
6.1
41.1
Py II
Mean
Median
Min
Max
1st quartile
3rd quartile
80.6
3.7
d.l.
1,273.2
1.4
19.0
329.7
117.6
0.8
1,636.6
16.1
417.2
3.0
2.4
d.l.
13.6
0.9
3.2
9.4
5.9
d.l.
43.2
3.0
13.9
3,015.6
148.0
d.l.
21,417.7
48.4
533.6
1.1
0.6
d.l.
4.4
0.3
1.6
48.6
49.0
30.9
76.1
40.7
54.5
138.3
40.3
0.1
800.2
11.8
124.2
511.8
69.9
0.1
7,205.3
2.7
557.2
52.3
52.6
48.3
55.2
52.1
53.6
10.7
3.7
0.1
169.6
2.2
8.7
121.0
25.9
0.7
640.1
12.8
102.1
Enargite Mean
Median
Min
Max
1st quartile
3rd quartile
101.6
108.5
31.1
214.5
52.7
114.9
13.5
13.4
11.8
15.5
12.5
14.2
0.5
0.6
0.1
0.8
0.4
0.7
33.8
33.2
24.9
45.8
28.8
37.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
32.7
32.7
32.7
32.7
32.7
32.7
6,410.8
5,527.7
4,273.7
9,543.1
4,876.6
8,167.5
3.1
3.2
1.8
5.5
2.6
3.4
Te
(ppm)
10.1
3.8
0.7
35.5
2.2
10.0
Zn
(ppm)
5.8
2.8
0.6
22.9
1.0
6.1
218.3
91.7
31.3
6.8
0.1
0.5
1,430.9 1,936.3
11.0
1.1
142.7
40.4
141.0
135.9
79.5
211.3
95.1
188.9
10-4
10-4
10-6
10-6
-1
10-1
10-3
10-3
10-5
Cu (afu)
10
Cu (afu)
10-2
As (afu)
Pyrite I
Pyrite II
10-2
10-5
10-3
10-7
10-7
10-5
10-3
Se (afu)
Te (afu)
10-5
10-5
10-5
Sb (afu)
Te (afu)
10-3
10-5
10-7
10-1
10-4
10-3
10-5
Co (afu)
Ag (afu)
10-7
10-5
-6
10
10-7
10-7
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
Au (afu)
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
Ag (afu)
Fig. 11. Binary plots of trace element concentration in pyrite analyzed by LA-ICP-MS and shown in atoms per formula
unit (afu).
BSE Images
Cu map
Co
pp
er
Iro
n
F
Ar
se
nic
Co
pp
er
Iro
n
H
Se
le
ni
u
m
Co
pp
er
Iro
n
PyI
PyII
PyI
33S
34S
36S
2.94
2.54
2.48
5.73
4.93
4.86
10.82
9.59
9.39
Note: The full analytical uncertainty (1s) for sulfur isotope analysis is
estimated to be 0.13 for 34S values, based on the long-term standard
deviation for repeat analyses of in-house standards
Discussion
Geologic setting
The Bawone and Binebase deposits occur at the southeastern end of a young volcanic island with an active volcano to
the northwest and a chain of extinct/dormant volcanic edifices
to the south. Both deposits are hosted by rocks of the Binebase Group, a thick andesitic sequence of alternating, interbedded porphyritic lava flows or epiclastic deposits and crystal
tuffs that were probably deposited in close proximity to a volcanic center. If, as seems likely, a volcano was located above
the Binebase and Bawone deposits (and was thus close to the
coast), its erosion would have been very rapid due to a combination of rising sea level (as indicated by the marine deposits
of the overlying Pinterang Formation), thermal subsidence as
the magmatic center moved northwest, and the hot, wet tropical climate. Consequently, all traces of the volcanic edifice
could have disappeared in tens of thousands of years.
Paleodepth and pressure
A very crude, approximate estimate of the depth and pressure of emplacement of the Bawone and Binebase deposits
can be made by comparing their current elevation to that of
the base of the crater of Awu volcano, the only active
volcano on Sangihe Island. This assumes that the volcano
overlying these deposits reached an elevation similar to that
of Awu vol- cano, and although this cannot be known, it is
suggested by the crater elevation of the somewhat larger
dormant/extinct Kaki- raeng volcano located immediately to
the west of the deposits. The elevation of the crater of this
volcano is 1,006 m (it has likely been reduced in height due
to erosion), whereas that of the crater of Awu volcano is
1,327 m (Fig. 1). By contrast, the Bawone and Binebase
deposits are exposed at elevations of 86 and 65 m,
respectively. Thus, if the crater of the volcano above the
deposits was at an elevation similar to those of Awu
Fig. 12. BSE images (A, C, E, G) and corresponding copper map (B) or composite Cu (green), Fe (blue) and As/Se (red)
maps (D, F, H) showing strong sector and growth zoning in py II. Brighter colors correspond to higher concentrations of the
given element. (A) BSE image of complex, m-scale, strongly growth zoned drusy pyrite overgrowing massive, porous pyrite,
also zoned. (B) Cu map of the same crystal, light blue-green represents higher Cu concentration; the darker the blue, the
lower is the Cu concentration. The growth zoning is perpendicular to the crystal growth direction and records the primary
growth history (50 m scale). (C, D) Drusy, py II with growth and sector zones and very high Cu concentrations (green)
and variably As-rich (red) bands transitioning outward into massive, porous py II with lower Cu concentration and isolated
zones of As enrichment (scale bar is 50 m). (E, F) Cross section is through a euhedral py II crystal displaying growth zoning
with alternating As (red) and Cu (green) enriched bands. Sector zoning most strongly evident as a Cu enrichment on three
equivalent faces about a three-fold axis (scale bar is 500 m). (G, H) Drusy py II crystals displaying complex growth zoning
in either Cu (green) or Se (red) bands. Sector zoning in Cu is also present in the form of a cross at the center of a cubic
pyrite grain, top-center (scale bar is 500 m).
Growth Zone 1
Growth Zone 2
Growth Zone 3
Co59
1 000 000
Fe57
Cu65
S34
100 000
Ni60
10 000
As75
Se77
1000
Te125
Bi209
Sb121
100
Au197
Zn66
Ag107
10
Pb208
50
100
150
200
250
Time (s)
Fig. 13. An example of a depth profile through three growth zones of a py II crystal produced by LA-ICP-MS, in counts
vs. time (depth) for major and trace elements. Arsenic, Te, and Au covary through the three growth zones and are
independent of Co, Cu, Ni, Zn, Se, and Bi, whereas Ag, Pb, and to some extent Sb covary independently of the other two
groups.
400
And
350
Py
Na-Al
Pyr
300
T (C)
Mag
Albite
Musc
Microcline
Hem
Fe2+
250
Al
Range of alteration
conditions
Kao
200
AA I fields 1 & 2
AA II field 1
AA III fields 4 & 5
150
100
IA I field 5
IA II field 3
10
12
14
pH
Fig. 14. Stability relationships among minerals in the K-Na-Al-Si-O-H and Fe-S-O systems as a function of temperature
and pH. Also shown are the fields of stability of the five main alteration facies (shaded areas), advanced argillic I (AA I),
advanced argillic II (AA II), advanced argillic III (AA III), intermediate argillic I (IA I), and intermediate argillic II (IA II).
The diagram was calculated for 200 bar (SVP), log fO2 = 30, quartz saturation, Na+/K+ = 10, aS = 0.01 and aAl3+ = 0.1 (see
text for details). Silicate and sulfate species are shown by solid lines, Fe species by dashed lines and sulfur species by dotted
lines. The model was calculated using SULF34 (Zhang, 1993) and The Geochemists Workbench (GW; Bethke, 2005) with
thermodynamic data from Holland and Powell (1998), Stoffregen et al. (2000), Helgeson (1978), Robie and Hemingway
(1995), and Johnson et al. (1992).
HSO
4
2-
-20
250C 15
SO
Al
Kao
log fO2
-25
-30
Musc
10
Microcline
Hem
+
AlSO
4
Mag
-35
0
H2S
Py
Fe2+
Pr
-40
2
H
S-
-20
AlSO4+
300C
2SO
4
log fO2
-25
Na-Al
Pyr
Musc
SO2
10
5
Albite
Hem
Mag
-30
HSO- 4
pH
Py
-35
Fe+2
Pr
pH
H2S
-40
0
-5
H
S-
Fig. 15. Log fO2-pH diagrams showing stability relationships for minerals in the K-Na-Al-Si-O-H and Fe-S-O systems
(A) at 250C, and (B) at 300C. The diagrams were created assuming a pressure of 200 bar (SVP), quartz saturation, Na+/K+
= 10, aS = 0.01 and aAl3+ = 0.1 (see text for details). Silicates and sulfate species are shown by solid lines, Fe-species by
dashed lines and sulfur species by dotted lines. The red lines are 34SH2S contours at 1, 5 (the measured 34S value for
Sangihe pyrite) and 10, and constrain the range of log fO2 values for Au-Ag mineralization to approximately 32 (Fig 16A)
and 27 (Fig 16B) assuming a pH of 2.5 (see text for details). The term log fO2 (HM) refers to the number of log units of fO2
above or below that of the hematite-magnetite buffer (calculated using The Geochemists Workbench).
fO2
Ore-forming high-sulfidation epithermal systems are characteristically oxidizing, with oxygen fugacity straddling or just
below that of the hematite-magnetite buffer. For example,
val- ues for log fO2 (HM) reported for some other highsulfidation deposits have ranges of 4.24 to 1.32 (Thiersch et
al., 1997),
2.4 to 0.07 (Muntean et al., 1990) and <2.5 (Voudouris, 2011).
If the sulfur source were dominantly magmatic, which is considered to be the case for most high-sulfidation deposits (e.g.,
Muntean et al., 1990; Rye et al., 1992; Rye, 1993; Arribas,
1995;
For example, Migdisov and Williams-Jones (2013) and Hurtig and Williams-Jones (2014) have shown that HCl-bearing
aqueous gases can dissolve ppm levels of Ag and Au, respectively, at temperatures as low as 400C. They have shown,
moreover, that the solubility of these metals increases exponentially with increasing f H2O. At the temperature and pressure predicted for the formation of the Bawone and Binbase
deposits, i.e., close to those of the H2O vapor-liquid boundary,
conditions would have been optimal for the transport of gold
and silver by magmatic vapor.
Direct evidence that condensed gases in environments
analogous to those of high-sulfidation epithermal deposits
can transport significant concentrations of metals is provided
by Kawah Ijen, an active volcano in eastern Java, Indonesia.
There, advanced argillic alteration (and residual silica alteration) is ongoing and accompanied by the crystallization of
pyrite enriched in Cu, Ag, and Au (Scher et al., 2013). The
fluid responsible for this alteration is a condensed magmatic
gas with a pH <1 containing ppm concentrations of Cu and
As (the concentrations of Au and Ag are below the level of
detection). Although the concentrations of Cu, Ag, and Au
in the Kawah Ijen pyrite are much lower than those in the
pyrite at Bawone and Binebase (because of the much lower
pressure and hence density of the gas), the metal ratios, e.g.,
Cu/Au and Ag/Au are very similar to those of the two Sangihe
Island deposits (Fig. 16). We can therefore conclude that the
two pyrite occurrences likely formed by the same process and
that the fluid which transported the ore metals in the Bawone
and Binebase deposits was therefore a magmatic gas. Several
other ore deposit studies have also documented gold mineralization associated with early advanced argillic alteration (e.g.,
Muntean et al., 1990; Voudouris, 2011).
Ore deposition
For the reasons presented above, we propose that the fluid
responsible for the formation of the Bawone and Binebase
deposits was a condensed magmatic gas. However, we consider it likely that this gas encountered a physicochemical
barrier, such as the water table or an impermeable cap rock.
This seems to have been the case for the deeper mineralization at Bawone (Figs. 3A, 6A), as the gas condensed to a lowpH liquid from which the ore mineral (pyrite) precipitated
or formed by replacement of primary iron-bearing minerals.
According to this interpretation, the ore metals were transported in the vapor as hydrated species, e.g., MeCl-H2O or
MeHS-H2O (Migdisov et al., 1999; Williams-Jones and Heinrich, 2005; Zezin et al., 2011b; Migdisov and Williams-Jones,
2013; Hurtig and Williams-Jones, 2014), whereas after condensation of the vapor to liquid, they would have been trans
ported as charged or neutral aqueous species like MeCl2 or
o
MeHS (Crerar and Barnes, 1976; Gammons and Barnes,
1989; Zotov et al., 1990; Gammons and Williams-Jones,
1997; Mountain and Seward, 2003; Stefnsson and Seward,
2004; Williams-Jones et al., 2009).
If saturation of the fluid with the metal had occurred, ore
deposition would have been controlled by reactions such as
the following:
Au(HS)o + H2O(l) = Au(s) + H2S + O2
AuCl2
+ H2O(l) = Au(s) +
2Cl
(1)
+
+ H + O2(g)
(2)
As (ppm)
1000
100
10
Cu (ppm)
1000
100
10
1
Ag (ppm)
1000
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
Au (ppm)
Fig. 16. Log-log plots comparing the trace element composition of py I
and py II with that of pyrite from an active high-sulfidation epithermal system
at Kawah Ijen volcano (Scher et al., 2013). From these plots, it is evident that
the ratios, Cu/Au and Ag/Au of py I and py II, and particularly the Ag/Au
ratio of py I, are broadly similar to those of Kawah Ijen pyrite.
16.79
Kd
Cu light
Au (ppm)
11.46
12.22
Kd
Cu (wt %)
1
1
2.65
2.23
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Distance
Fig. 17. A plot showing the variation in the partition coefficient (Kd; black line) and the concentration of Cu (red line)
as a function of the distance (in percent) from the core to the rim of a single pyrite crystal (BID34-84). In this plot, the Kd
corresponds to the ratio of the Cu concentration in one sector zone (the one with the higher overall Cu concentration, i.e.,
the light zone in BSE images, e.g., Fig. 13) to the Cu concentration in the adjacent sector zone (the dark zone), within
the same growth zone. The Kd is inferred to vary inversely with temperature following van Hinsberg and Schumacher (2007).
The yellow squares represent gold concentrations analyzed by LA-ICP-MS, with the width of the square corresponding to
the diameter of the pit in relation to the growth zones. The vertical scale on the right hand side of the diagram indicates the
Cu concentration. The highest gold concentrations correspond to regions where the Kd is stable, whereas lower gold concentrations correspond to intervals over which there is a rapid change in Kd values; Cu concentrations show the same behavior.
conduits (Al and particularly Si experienced only minor depletion; Fig. 10). Iron and many trace elements, except for the
REE, Rb and Cs, were enriched, in some cases by orders of
magnitude, relative to their original abundance.
Auriferous py II was deposited in veins and in open space
created by mineral dissolution. These same veins were fractured and the fractures filled by barite and enargite. Rare, late
auriferous (electrum) barite-base metal (sphalerite and chalcopyrite) veins formed at Binebase.
Py I, which is associated with advanced and intermediate
argillic alteration, and py II, precipitated under conditions
for which metals, including gold, were undersaturated in
the fluid. The metals, i.e., Au, Ag, and Cu, were adsorbed
onto the surfaces of the growing pyrite crystals and incorporated in the pyrite either as a solid solution or as nanoparticles. Some gold and silver were incorporated in enargite by
the same mechanisms (Fig. 18). The Bawone and Binbase
deposits were subsequently exhumed and partially oxidized,
creating an upper zone of supergene-enriched oxide ore and
deeper lower-grade hypogene ores.
Impermeable
AuHS . nH2O
H2 SO42AuCl
AuHSo
H O
2
Impermeable
Advanced Argillic
AuHS . nH 2O
H SO
2
24
AuCl2 Cu
Cu
CuHS . nH 2O
AuCl2 . nH 2O
Cu
Py II Ba-En veins
Pyrite
Au
AgCl . nH 2O
H2S
CO2
SO2
H2O
Argillic
CuHS. nH2O
AuHSo
Fig. 18. A cartoon cross section through the stratovolcano that may have hosted the Bawone and Binebase gold deposits.
Moderately dipping flows and volcaniclastic units with variable porosity and permeability are crosscut by structures that
permitted transfer of heat and fluids (red) upward. The latter caused hydrothermal alteration of the adjacent rocks (pink).
Some of the conduits vented at the surface, producing solfataras, whereas others terminated at impermeable barriers, such as
the welded andesite tuff in the Bawone deposit, or at perched water tables corresponding to permeable and less permeable/
impermeable layers. The small circle in the cross section indicates the location of the large circles, labeled A to C. Circle A
illustrates the transport of the metals as hydrated species in magmatic vapor rising through the volcanic pile and condensing at
an impermeable boundary. Circle B shows the distribution of rocks altered by highly acidic condensed vapor, and the
accom- panying pyrite-hosted gold (copper, silver) mineralization. Finally, Circle C depicts a pyrite crystal with two types
of faces onto which copper and gold adsorbed preferentially from a gold-undersaturated condensed vapor to produce gold
(copper, silver)-rich sector- and growth-zoned pyrite II. Multiple iterations of this process are likely required to produce an
economic high-sulfidation deposit of this style.
Conclusions
Textural and geochemical observations provide compelling evidence that the Bawone and Binebase gold deposits
were the products of a condensed acidic magmatic vapor.
This fluid produced the advanced argillic and intermediate
argillic alteration that is characteristic of high-sulfidation epithermal systems and deposited gold, as well as copper and
silver, either within the structure of pyrite or as nanoparticles
within this mineral. The fluid did not deposit native gold or
electrum (except in very late veins at Binebase) and so we
conclude that it was undersaturated in respect to these metals. Instead of precipitating directly from the fluid, gold and
silver were concentrated by adsorption onto the surfaces of
growing pyrite (and to a much lesser extent enargite) crystals,
where they either formed nanoparticles or substituted for iron
in the structure of the mineral. Much of the auriferous pyrite
formed during advanced and intermediate argillic alteration
as a result of the sulfidation of primary mafic minerals. Auriferous pyrite (py II) crystallized later, filling fractures in the
earlier formed pyrite, and was joined even later by Au-Ag
bearing enargite that precipitated in reopened pyrite II veins.
Although the later pyrite II is richer in Au than pyrite I, and
enargite is richer in Ag than both pyrite generations, the precious metals in both minerals are interpreted to have concentrated from a condensed magmatic vapor by adsorption
during crystal growth. The Bawone and Binebase deposits are
part of the continuum of high-sulfidation deposits, formed
from a condensed magmatic vapor, and record a mineralizing
process that likely has contributed to the formation of many
other high-sulfidation deposits.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank East Asia Minerals for their financial and
logistical support, in particular Tom Mulja for suggesting the
project and for his assistance and comments. The field component of the research would not have been possible without
the help of Arodji Wisanggono, Johnnedy Situmorang, Mardy
Posumah, Grace Kapal, and the staff on Sangihe Island and
in Jakarta. Simon Jackson and Jeanne Percival at the GSC,
Boswell Wing and Libby Sharman of the Sulfur Isotope laboratory at McGill University, Lang Shi and Jeanne Paquette
provided invaluable assistance with the analytical aspects of
the research. The project was funded by East Asia Minerals
and an NSERC-CRD grant to A.E. Williams-Jones and G.
Williams-Jones with additional support by DIVEX. Constructive reviews by R. Fifarek, R.W. Henley, and associate editor
D. John improved the paper considerably.
REFERENCES
Abraitis, P.K., Pattrick, R.A.D., and Vaughan, D.J., 2004, Variations in the
compositional, textural and electrical properties of natural pyrite: A review:
International Journal of Mineral Processing, v. 74, p. 4159.
Agrawal, S., Guevara, M., and Verma, S., 2008, Tectonic discrimination of
basic and ultrabasic volcanic rocks through log-transformed ratios of immobile trace elements: International Geology Review, v. 50, p. 10571079.
Archibald, S., Migdisov, A.A., and Williams-Jones, A.E., 2001, The stability
of Au-chloride complexes in water vapor at elevated temperatures and
pres- sures: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 65, p. 44134423.
Archibald, S.M., Migdisov, A.A., and Williams-Jones, A.E., 2002, An experimental study of the stability of copper chloride complexes in water vapor at
elevated temperatures and pressures: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,
v. 66, p. 16111619.
investigated by SIMS and EMP, and color staining and surface oxidation
by
XPS and LIMS: The Canadian Mineralogist, v. 31, p. 1
17.
Fulignati, P., Gioncada, A., and Sbrana, A., 1998, Geologic model of the magmatic-hydrothermal system of Vulcano (Aeolian Islands, Italy): Mineralogy
and Petrology, v. 62, p. 195222.
Fulignati, P., Gioncada, A., and Sbrana, A., 1999, Rare-earth element
(REE) behaviour in the alteration facies of the active magmatichydrothermal sys- tem of Vulcano (Aeolian Islands Italy): Journal of
Volcanology and Geother- mal Research, v. 88, p. 325342.
Gammons, C.H., and Barnes, H.L., 1989, The solubility of Ag2S in near-neutral aqueous sulfide solutions at 25 to 300C: Geochimica et Cosmochimica
Acta, v. 53, p. 279
290.
Gammons, C.H., and Williams-Jones, A.E., 1997, Chemical mobility of gold
in the porphyry-epithermal environment: Economic Geology, v. 92, p. 45
59. Garwin, S.L., 1990, South Sangihe Regional Reconnaissance
Program:
Jakarta, Indonesia, Report for P.T. Meares Soputan Mining, 84 p.
Grant, A., 1986, The isocon diagram: A simple solution to Gresens equation
for metasomatic alteration: Economic Geology, v. 81, p. 19761982.
Hall, R., 1996, Reconstructing Cenozoic Southeast Asia, in Hall, R., and
Blundell, D. eds., Tectonic evolution of Southeast Asia: Geological Society,
London, Special Publication 106, p. 153184.
2000, Neogene history of collision in the Halmahera region, Indonesia,
in Proceedings of the Indonesian Petroleum Association 27th Annual Convention, Jakarta, Indonesia, p. 487493.
Hedenquist, J.W., Matsuhisa, Y., Izawa, E., White, N.C., Giggenbach, W.F.,
and Aoki, M., 1994, Geology, geochemistry, and origin of high sulfidation
Cu-Au mineralization in the Nansatsu district, Japan: Economic Geology, v. 89, p. l30.
Hedenquist, J.W., Arribas, A.R., and Reynolds, J.T., 1998, Evolution of an
intrusion-centered hydrothermal system: Far Southeast-Lepanto porphyry
and epithermal Cu-Au deposits, Philippines: Economic Geology, v. 93,
p. 373404.
Hedenquist, J.W., Arribas, A.R., and Gonzalez-Urien, E., 2000, Exploration for epithermal ore deposits: Reviews in Economic Geology, v. 13, p.
245277.
Heinrich, C.A., Gnther, D., Audtat, A., Ulrich, T., and Frischknecht, R.,
1999, Metal fractionation between magmatic brine and vapor, determined
by microanalysis of fluid inclusions: Geology, v. 27, p. 755758.
Helgeson, H.C., 1978, Summary and critique of the thermodynamic properties of rock-forming minerals: American Journal of Science, v. 278, p. 1229.
Hemley, J.J., Hostetler, P.B., Gude, A.J., and Mountjoy, W.T., 1969,
Some
stability relations of alunite: Economic Geology, v. 64, p. 599612.
Hemley, J.J., and Jones, W.R., 1964, Chemical aspects of hydrothermal
alteration with emphasis on hydrogen metasomatism: Economic Geology, v.
59, p. 538569.
Henley, R.W., and Berger, B.R., 2011, Magmatic-vapor expansion and the
formation of high-sulfidation gold deposits: Chemical controls on alteration
and mineralization: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 39, p. 6374.
Holland, T.J.B., and Powell, R., 1998, An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest: Journal of Metamorphic
Geology, v. 16, p. 309343.
Hopf, S., 1993, Behaviour of rare earth elements in geothermal systems of
New Zealand: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 47, p. 333357.
Hurtig, N., and Williams-Jones, A.E., 2014, An experimental study of the
transport of gold through hydration of AuCl in aqueous vapour and vapourlike fluids: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 127, p. 305325.
Huston, D.L., Sie, S.H., Suter, G.F., Cooke, D.R., and Both, R.A., 1995,
Sulfide deposits: Part I. Proton microprobe analyses of pyrite, and part II.
Selenium levels in pyrite: Comparison with 34S values and implications
for the source of sulfur in volcanogenic hydrothermal systems: Economic
Geology, v. 90, p. 11671196.
Jannas, R.R., Beane, R.E., and Ahler, B.A., 1990, Gold and copper mineralization at the El Indio deposit, Chile: Journal of Geochemical Exploration,
v. 36, p. 233266.
Johnson, J.W., Oelkers, E.H., and Helgeson, H.C., 1992, SUPCRT92: A software package for calculating the standard molal thermodynamic properties
of minerals, gases, aqueous species, and reactions from 1 to 5000 bar and 0
to 1000C: Computers & Geosciences, v. 18, p. 899947.
Karakaya, N., 2009, REE and HFS element behaviour in the alteration facies
of the Erenler
Dag Volcanics (Konya, Turkey) and kaolinite
occurrence: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 101, p. 185208.
Kesler, S.E., Russell, N., Seaward, M., Rivera, J., McCurdy, K., Cumming,
G.L., and Sutter, J.F., 1981, Geology and geochemistry of sulfide mineralization underlying the Pueblo Viejo gold-silver oxide deposit, Dominican
Republic: Economic Geology, v. 76, p. 10961117.
Knight, J.E., 1977, A thermochemical study of alunite, enargite, luzonite, and
tennantite deposits: Economic Geology, v. 72, p. 13211336.
Landtwing, M.R., Furrer, C.F., Redmond, P.B., Pettke, T., Guillong, M.,
and Heinrich, C.A., 2010, The Bingham Canyon porphyry Cu-Mo-Au
deposit: III. Zoned copper-gold ore deposition by magmatic vapor
expansion: Eco- nomic Geology, v. 105, p. 91118.
Lewis, A.J., Palmer, M.R., Sturchio, N.C., and Kemp, A.J., 1997, The rare
earth element geochemistry of acid-sulphate and acid-sulphate-chloride
geothermal systems from Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 61, p. 695706.
Lottermoser, B.G., 1992, Rare earth elements and hydrothermal ore formation processes: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 7, p. 2541.
MacLean, W.H., and Kranidiotis, P., 1987, Immobile elements as monitors
of mass transfer in hydrothermal alteration: Phelps Dodge massive sulfide
deposit, Matagami, Quebec: Economic Geology, v. 82, p. 951962.
Maske, S., and Skinner, B.J., 1971, Studies of the sulfosalts of copper: I.
Phases and phase relations in the system Cu-As-S: Economic Geology,
v. 66, p. 901918.
Mavrogenes, J., Henley, R.W., Reyes, A.G., and Berger, B., 2010, Sulfosalt
melts: Evidence of high-temperature vapor transport of metals in the formation of high-sulfidation lode gold deposits: Economic Geology, v.
105, p. 257262.
Meyer, C., and Hemley, J., 1967, Wall rock alteration, in Barnes, H.L., ed.,
Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits: New York, Holt, Rinehart, and
Winston, p. 166234.
Michard, A., 1989, Rare earth element systematics in hydrothermal fluids:
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 53, p. 745750.
Migdisov, A.A., and Williams-Jones, A.E., 2013, A predictive model for transport of silver chloride by aqueous vapor in ore-forming magmatic-hydrothermal systems: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Actamica, v. 104, p. 123135.
Migdisov, A.A., Williams-Jones, A.E., and Suleimenov, O.M., 1999,
Solubility of chlorargyrite (AgCl) in water vapor at elevated temperatures
and pres- sures: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 63, p. 38173827.
Migdisov, A.A., Williams-Jones, A.E., and Wagner, T., 2009, An
experimental study of the solubility and speciation of the rare earth
elements (III) in fluo- ride- and chloride-bearing aqueous solutions at
temperatures up to 300C: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 73, p.
70877109.
Miller, S.E., Heath, G.R., and Gonzalez, R.D., 1982, Effects of temperature
on the sorption of lanthanides by montmorillonite: Clays and Clay Minerals,
v. 30, p. 111122.
Moritz, R., Kouzmanov, K., and Petrunov, R., 2004, Late Cretaceous Cu-Au
epithermal deposits of the Panagyurishte district, Srednogorie zone, Bulgaria: Swiss Bulletin of Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 84, p. 7999.
Morrice, M.G., and Gill, J.B., 1986, Spatial patterns in the mineraloogy of
island arc magma series: Sangihe Arc, Indonesia: Journal of Volcanology
and Geothermal Research, v. 29, p. 311353.
Morrice, M.G., Jezek, P.A., Gill, J.B., Whitford, D.J., and Monoarfa, M.,
1983, An introduction to the Sangihe Arc: Volcanism accompanying arc-arc
collision in the Molucca Sea, Indonesia: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 19, p. 135165.
Mountain, B.W., and Seward, T.M., 2003, Hydrosulfide/sulfide complexes of
copper (I): Experimental confirmation of the stoichiometry and stability of
Cu (HS)2 to elevated temperatures: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v.
67, p. 30053014.
Muntean, J.L., Kesler, S.E., and Russell, N., 1990, Evolution of the Monte
Negro acid sulfate Au-Ag deposit, Pueblo Viejo, Dominican Republic:
Important factors in grade development: Economic Geology, v. 85, p.
17381758.
Oberthr,
T., Weiser, T., Amanor, J., and Chryssoulis, S., 1997,
Mineralogi- cal setting and distribution of gold in quartz veins and sulfide
ores of the Ashanti mine and other deposits in the Ashanti belt of
Ghana: Genetic implications: Mineralium Deposita, v. 32, p. 215.
Pacevski, A., Libowitzky, E., Zivkovic, P., Dimitrijevic, R., and Cvetkovic, L.,
2008, Copper-bearing pyrite from the Coka Marin polymetallic deposit,
Serbia: Mineral inclusions or true solid-solution?: The Canadian Mineralogist, v. 46, p. 249261.
Pals, D.W., Spry, P.G., and Chryssoulis, S.L., 2003, Invisible gold and tellurium in arsenic-rich pyrite from the Emperor gold deposit, Fiji: Implications for gold distribution and deposition: Economic Geology, v. 98, p.
479493.
Stone, M., 2010, Sangihe property, Sangihe Island, North Sulawesi, Indonesia: Independent technical report, 130 p.
Taylor, B.E., 2007, Epithermal gold deposits, in Goodfellow, W.D. ed.,
Min- eral deposits of Canada: A synthesis of major deposit-types, district
metal- logeny, the evolution of geological provinces, and exploration
methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division,
St. Johns, p. 113139.
Thiersch, P.C., Williams-Jones, A.E., and Clark, J.R., 1997, Epithermal mineralization and ore controls of the Shasta Au-Ag deposit, Toodoggone District, British Columbia, Canada: Mineralium Deposita, v. 32, p. 4457.
Thode, H.G., Monster, J., and Dunford, H.B., 1961, Sulphur isotope geochemistry: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 25, p. 150174.
Thode, H.G., and Rees, C., 1979, Sulphur isotopes in lunar and meteorite
samples: Proceedings of Lunar Planetary Science Conference 10th, Houston, Texas, March 1317, 1979, p. 16291636.
Ulrich, T., Gunther, D., and Heinrich, C.A., 1999, Gold concentrations
of magmatic brines and the metal budget of porphyry copper deposits:
Nature, v. 399, p. 676679.
van Hinsberg, V.J., and Schumacher, J.C., 2007, Intersector element partitioning in tourmaline: A potentially powerful single crystal thermometer:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 153, p. 289301.
Voudouris, P.C., 2010, Conditions of formation of the Mavrokoryfi highsulfidation epithermal Cu-Ag-Au-Te mineralization (Petrota Graben, NE
Greece): Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 101, p. 97113.
Warren, I., Simmons, S.F., and Mauk, J.L., 2007, Whole-rock geochemical
techniques for evaluating hydrothermal alteration, mass changes, and compositional gradients associated with epithermal Au-Ag mineralization: Economic Geology, v. 102, p. 923948.
White, D., 1957, Thermal waters of volcanic origin: Geological Society of
America Bulletin, v. 68, p. 16371657.
White, N.C., and Hedenquist, J.W., 1990, Epithermal environments and
styles of mineralization: Variations and their causes, and guidelines for
exploration: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 36, p. 445474.
Wilder, A.M., and Seward, T.M., 2002, The adsorption of gold(I)
hydrosulfide complexes by iron sufide surfaces: Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta, v.
66, p. 383402.
Williams-Jones, A.E., and Heinrich, C.A., 2005, Vapor transport of metals
and the formation of magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits: Economic
Geology, v. 100, p. 12871312.
Williams-Jones, A.E., Migdisov, A.A., Archibald, S.A., and Xiao, Z., 2002,
Vapor-transport of ore metals, in Hellmann, R., and Wood, S.A. eds.,
Water- rock interactions, ore deposits, and environmental geochemistry: A
tribute to David A. Crerar: The Geochemical Society, p. 279306.
Williams-Jones, A.E., Bowell, R.J., and Migdisov, A.A., 2009, Gold in solution: Elements, v. 5, p. 281287.
Zezin, D., Migdisov, A.A., and Williams-Jones, A.E., 2011a, PVTx properties of H2O-H2S fluid mixtures at elevated temperature and pressure based
on new experimental data: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 75, p.
54835495.
2011b, The solubility of gold in H2O-H2S vapour at elevated temperature and pressure: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 75, p. 51405153.
Zhang, X., 1993, SULF34: A QUICKBASIC program for calculating sulfur
isotope distribution in log fO2-pH diagram: Computers & Geosciences, v.
19, p. 817823.
Zotov, N., Petrov, K., and Dimitrova-Pankova, M., 1990, Infrared spectra of
Cu (II)-Co (II) mixed hydroxide nitrates: Journal of Physics and Chemistry
of Solids, v. 51, p. 11991205.