Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
The hair shampoo is widely used amongst the other hair
care products used in daily life. Shampoos are used mainly
for cleansing the hair and scalp. The leaves Zizyphus
oenoplia (L) MILL plant, locally called as Rhamnus oenoplia
L or jackal jujube belonging to family Rhamnacae, this plant
distributed throughout the tropical parts of India, Ceylontropical Asia and Australia. [1] The roots of Zizyphus
oenoplia herbs have various activities like antiulcer,
antioxidant, [1-2] anthelminthic. [3-4] Chemical investigation
of this plant has shown the presence of cyclopeptide
alkaloids such as Zizyphus oenoplia A, B, C, D, E, abyssinine
B and A in stem bark of the plant angiogenic potential, [5]
antidenaturation and antibacteial activity, [6] wound
healing activity [7] hepatoprotective potential against
antitubercular drugs induced hepatotoxicity [8] and the part
of stomach pain medicine (pills) with the Munda tribe. [9]
Leaves numerous, 2.5-6.5 by 2-2.5 cm, ovate, acute to
mentose tips, galabarous, densely silky with hair, petioles
6-8 mm long, flower 12-20 sub sessile calyx hairy outside,
petals obviate. Fruits are edible. The bark, fruits, leaves and
stem of plant is extensively used in the rural area for
stomachache, hypotensive, low diuretic activity, wound
healing, antibacterial, anti-fungal, anti-inflammatory,
analgesic etc. Hence the ideology of preparation of a self
preserved with low concentration of a detergent will be
reducing the risk of chemicals. Sodium lauryl sulfate based
detergents are the most common but the concentration will
vary substantial from brand to brand and even within a
manufacturers product range. Objective of work was to
1Department
2Department
3Guru
50
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Table 1: Composition of the Prepared Zizyphus oenoplia (L) MILL Shampoo Formulations
Ingredients (% w/w)
Ziziphus extract
Sodium lauryl sulfate
Glycerin
EDTA
Distilled water (ml) q.s.
F0
15.00
1
0.15
100.00
F1
5
10.00
1
0.15
100.00
F2
10.00
5.00
1
0.15
100.00
F3
20
0.00
1
0.15
100.00
Table 2: Physical Appearance of the Prepared Zizyphus oenoplia (L) MILL Shampoo Formulation
Formulations
F0
F1
F2
F3
Reference
Physical Appearance
Transparent
Dark green
Dark green
Light green
Light green
Clear four types of shampoo formulations designated as F0, F-1, F-2 and F-3 were prepared as shown in Table 1. F1,
F2 and F3 were prepared by assimilation of 5, 10 and 20%
w/w extract of Zizyphus oenoplia (L) MILL in 10%, 5% and
0% w/w of sodium lauryl sulfate. The volume was making
up to 100 ml with distilled water. As control sample, F-0
was taken (without plant extract).
5. Wetting Time
The canvas was cut into 1-inch diameter discs which having
an average weight of 0.44 g. The disc was floated on the
surface of prepared herbal shampoo solution 1% w/v and
started the stopwatch. The time necessary for the disc to
begin to sink was measured accurately and noted as the
wetting time.
6. Rheological Property
The viscosity of the organized herbal formulations was
measured at room temperature using a digital Rheometer
(Brookfield DV-III ultra, Brookfield Engineering Lab. Inc.,
USA) fitted the spindle No. S 17 at dissimilar spindle
speeds, the best approach is optimized for measurements.
[11] Three times performed all measurements, at room
temperature and the viscosity profile of the herbal
shampoo was measured.
7. Dirt Dispersion
In a large test tube, two drops of herbal shampoo was
added which have 10 ml of distilled water and add one
drop of Indian ink. Shack the test tube for ten times. The
amount of ink in the foam was estimated like as none, light,
moderate, or heavy etc.
2. Determination of pH
Determination of pH of herbal shampoo formulation (10%
w/v) was done in distilled water at room temperature [10]
using digital pH meter (Mettler Teledo USA).
3. Percentage of Solid Contents
4 grams of the prepared herbal shampoo was placed in a
well clean dry evaporating dish. The liquid portion of the
shampoo was evaporated by placing on a hot plate
instrument, after that weight of the shampoo and total
solid contents after complete drying was measured.
4. Surface Tension Measurement
The surface tension measurement of the formulated
herbal shampoo (10% w/v in distilled water) was
passed out at 20C by using Nuoy tensiometer (Lauda
Germany).
51
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Table 3: In-vitro Evaluation of the Prepared Zizyphus oenoplia (L) MILL Shampoo Formulations
Formula
pH
F0
F1
F2
F3
Reference
5.510.07
5.530.03
5.810.04
7.630.02
6.910.01
Solid Contents
(%)
19.110.02
22.510.02
25.110.02
28.110.02
29.110.02
Surface Tension
(dynes cm-1)
34.90.32
37.70.02
32.80.12
34.60.62
33.10.42
Wetting Time
(Sec)
2270.22
1710.19
1760.74
1590.79
1850.81
Detergency (%)
Cleaning (%)
61.100.32
76.710.12
67.670.49
63.570.26
80.120.90
18.200.02
24.500.08
32.200.05
33.610.09
34.200.02
9. Detergency Evaluation
Thompson method [23] was used to evaluate the detergency
of the prepared herbal shampoo with minor adjustment
given that our results were evaluated gravimetrically. Hair
tresses of Asian (Indian) origin were obtained from the
market. The tresses prewashed with 5% sodium lauryl
sulfate solution and dried and cut into 10 inch, 3 gm
swatches. The sebum composition was selected to include a
variety of functional groups similar to that in actual
sebum.
The genuine formula for the artificial sebum was used in
our study, olive oil 2%, coconut oil 15% and oleic acid 15%,
paraffin wax 15% and cholesterol 20%. The hair swatch (3
gm) was floating in 20 ml of a 10% sebum solution in
hexane for 15 min with intermittent shaking, the swatch
was removed. For the determination of sebum load the
solvent was evaporated at room temperature and the hair
swatch weighted. Fifteen swatches were treated as same
and the soil levels were found in range from 9.97 to 11.06
%. Each swatch was then split into two equal samples of 1.6
gm each; one for the herbal shampoo action and the other
to act as internal control to conquer the tress-to-tress
variation in soil levels. Left untreated for control swatch.
The test swatch was washed with 0.1 ml of herbal shampoo
solution 10% using the finger method. [14] Dry the herbal
shampoo solution 10% using a hair dryer and further dried
in an oven at 60 degrees for 4 hours to ensure uniform
moisture content.
The remaining solution in the test swatch after herbal
shampoo and extracted the unwashed control swatch by
using 20 ml hexane in a stopper flask for 30 minutes on a
rotary shaker. Evaporate the hexane solution to dryness
and the sebum extracted from the test and control
swatches were weighed. According to the following
equation percentage of detergency was evaluated as of
sebum removed after shampooing:
52
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Table 4: Foam Volume of Shampoo Formulations
Formulas
F0
F1
F2
F3
Reference
DW
0 Min
168
153
158
175
166
3 Min
109
116
131
138
135
DW + Soil
0 Min
63
57
136
92
142
3 Min
59
53
90
90
98
1 Month
Clear, dark green
5.510.02
22.510.02
33.220.12
67.001.89
65.120.12
160
3 Month
Clear, dark green
5.610.82
26.511.02
35.200.72
66.195.89
54.110.52
158
5. Detergency Evaluation
The principal aim of evaluation of shampoo is removing
and cleaning of soil/sebum, experimental detergency has
been difficult to standardize, since there is no genuine
agreement on a standard soil, a reproducible soiling
procedure or the quantity of soil a shampoo should ideally
remove.
By means of greasy wool yarn by Barnette and Powers,
detergency evaluation was done in prior study. For
evaluation of detergency using 10 mg of hair clippings
obtained from salons. [18-20] Thompson et al., [14] used hair
tresses soiled with artificial sebum for evaluating
detergency. [21]
Conversely our formulas were evaluated gravimetrically
and results indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) in
the quantity of sebum removed by different shampoos.
Shampoo F0, being a frequent-use cleanser, was expected
to have the smallest amount detergency. Shampoos F2 and
F3 also show moderate detergency and may be regarded as
mild cleansers. However shampoo F1 and reference are
active cleanser and are more appropriate for oily hair then
normal hair (Table 3).
3. Surface Tension
All prepared herbal shampoo formulations observed with
similar reduction in surface tension (p less than 0.05), as
presented in Table 3. Surface tension reduction is one of
the mechanisms of detergency. The decrease in surface
tension of water from 72.8 dynes cm-1 to 32-37 dynes cm-1
by the shampoos reflects of their good properties of
detergent action.
4. Wetting Action
The rate of wetting or the wetting ability of surface-active
agents is normally used to find out their comparative
efficacies. Even though the Draves test [19] has been
adopted as the official test, the canvas disc wetting test [20]
offers a number of advantages over it. The canvas disc
technique is more accurate and time reducing then the
official test. For the canvas test also, the different materials
and apparatus required which is easily available in the
laboratory, unlike the Dreves test, [19] which requires cotton
2 Month
Clear, dark green
5.531.02
24.110.92
32.520.32
65.280.99
67.100.10
160
6. Cleaning Action
Cleaning action of herbal shampoo was evaluated on wool
yarn in grease. Though cleaning or soil/sebum removed is
53
RESEARCH ARTICLE
the main aim of a shampoo, experimental detergency
evaluation has been difficult to standardize, as there is no
genuine concord on a standard soil, a reproducible soiling
process or the amount of soil a shampoo should preferably
remove. As given in the results, there is a major difference
in the amount of sebum removed by the different shampoo.
The final herbal formulation results of detergency showed
that has significantly similar detergency ability, when
compared to the marketed preparations and it was found in
between 19-33 % (Table 3).
7. Dirt Dispersion
Herbal Shampoo that causes link to concentrate in the foam
is considered as poor quality product, the dirt should not
stay in the foam because it will be difficult to rinse away. All
three formulated herbal shampoos (F1, F2 and F3) showed
similar results as compared the marketed one, except the
control (F0). These results illustrate that no dirt would
stays in the foam, so prepared formulations were
satisfactory. [22-23]
CONCLUSION
The current study intended to prepare a stable, self
preserved herbal shampoo formulation which contains less
concentration of detergent to reduce the risk of skin
infection. No significant difference between both F2 and F3
in comparison with the reference marketed shampoo was
seen regarding the physicochemical properties and in-vivo
evaluation.
8. Viscosity
Product of viscosity plays a vital role in physical properties
like as shelf life stability and product aesthetics such as
clarity ease of flow on removal from packing a spreading on
application to hair and product consistency in the package.
The flow properties of non-newtonian formulations are
usually not measured with a single data point, since their
viscosity is reliant on the shear rate. The best way is to take
multipoint measurements determined to those of the
process being modeled. [24-25]
Shampoo F0 and F1 indicates low viscosity products,
whose viscosity remains almost unchanged over the range
of r.p.m. used. Shampoo F2 and F3 illustrate pseudoplastic
behavior same as the commercial one (reference), which is
a pleasing quality in a shampoo preparation. On raising the
shear, the viscosity drops, which would allow ease of
distribution on the hair.
REFERENCES
1. Jadhav S A, Prassanna S M. Evaluation of antiulcer activity of
Ziziphus oenoplia (L.) Mill roots in rats. Asian J Pharm Clin Res,
1(1):92-95, 2011.
2. Jadhav S A, Chavan S D. In-vitro antioxidant activity of Ziziphus
oenoplia (L.) Mill Root extract. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci,
4(4):586-588, 2012.
3. Majumder P. In-vitro anthelmintic activity of Zyziphus oenoplia
(L.) Mill root extracts a promising ethnomedicinal plant. Int J
Res Rev Pharm Appl Sci, 1(4):334-340, 2011.
4. Jadhav S A, Chavan S D, Jadhav D P. Preliminary Phytochemical
and anthelminticactivity of Ziziphus oenoplia (L.) Mill. J Chem
Pharm Res, 2(3):543-545, 2012.
5. Suksamrarn S, Suwannapoch N, Aunchai N, Kuno M,
Ratananukul P, Haritakun R. Ziziphine N O P and Q new
antiplasmodial cyclopeptide alkaloids from Ziziphus oenoplia
var. brunoniana. Tetrahedron, 61:1175- 1180, 2005.
6. Mahapatra S S, Mohanta S, Satyaranjan, Nayak K A. Preliminary
investigation of the angiogenic potential of Ziziphus oenoplia
root ethanolic extract using the chorioallantoic membrane
model. Science Asia, 37:72-74, 2011.
7. Ramalingam R, Madhavi B B, Nath A R, Duganath N, Sri U E,
Banji D. In-vitro antidenaturation and antibacterial activities
of Ziziphus oenoplia. Scholars Research Library, Der Pharmacia
Lettre, 2(1):87-93, 2010.
8. Kuppast I J, Kumar K V S. Wound healing activity of aqueous
and alcoholic extracts of fruits of Ziziphus oenoplia. Int J Chem
Sci, 10(2):1021-1027, 2012.
9. Rao Ch V, Rawat A K S, Singh A P, Singh A, Verma N.
Hepatoprotective potential of ethanolic extract of Ziziphus
oenoplia (L.) Mill roots against antitubercular drugs induced
hepatotoxicity in experimental models. Asian Pac J Trop Med,
283-288, 2012.
10. Griffin J J, Corcoran R F and Akana K K. The pH of hair
shampoo. J Soc Cosmet Chem, 54:553-554, 1997.
11. Hart J R and Dc George M T. The lathering potential of
surfactants- a simplified approach to measurement. J Soc
Cosmet, 31:223-236, 1980.
54
RESEARCH ARTICLE
12. Mainkar A R and Jolly C I. Evaluation of commercial herbal
shampoos. International Journal of Cosmetic Science,
22(5):385-391, 2000.
13. Sandhu S S, Ramchandran R and Robbins C R. A simple and
sensitive method ysing protein loss measurements to evaluate
damage to human hair during cumbing. J Soc Cosmet Chem,
46:39-52, 1995.
14. Thompson D, Lemater C, Allen R and Whitten J. Evaluation of
relative shampoo detergency. J Soc Cosmet Chem, 36:271-286,
1985.
15. Barenett G and Powers D H. A quantitative method for the
evaluation and study of shampoo. J Soc Cosmet Chem, 2:219228, 1951.
16. Shaw D A. The extraction, quantification and nature of hair
lipid. Int J Cosmet Sci, 1:291-302, 1979.
17. Ishii M K. Objective and instrumental method for evaluation of
hair care product efficacy and substantiation of claims. In
Johnson D H, Hair and hair care. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York,
260-302, 1997.
18. Gloor M. Determination and analysis of sebum on skin and
hairs. Cosmet Sc, 1:217, 1978.
19. Draves C Z and Clarkson G R. A new method for the evaluation
of wetting agents. Am Dyestuff Reptr, 20:201, 1931.
20. Seyperth H and Morgan O M. The canvas disc wetting test. Am
Dyestuff Reptr, 27:525-532, 1977.
55