12/2/2016

IslamicPopulismAcriticalapproachtostudyingpoliticalIslamMon,September192016TheJakartaPost

NEWS

BUSINESS

SE ASIA

COMMUNITY

OPINION

LIFESTYLE

TRAVEL

VIDEO

PAPER EDITION

JOBS

TODAY'S PAPER

Islamic Populism - A critical approach to studying

political Islam
Iqra Anugrah
Contributor

DeKalb, Illinois | Mon, September 19 2016 | 09:36 am

Topics

407
Share this article

Follow Us

Islamic Populism in Indonesia and the Middle East

By Vedi R. Hadiz
Cambridge University Press, 2016
228 pages
The relationship between Islam and politics continues to be a pertinent aspect of the
study of religion and politics.
In the mainstream approach to the study of religion and politics, the main research
questions typically revolve around the (in)compatibility of Islam and liberal democratic
institutions and ideas electoral politics, the market economy and civic values.
Such an approach, however, has become an orthodoxy and is pervasive in studies of
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/09/19/islamicpopulismacriticalapproachstudyingpoliticalislam.html

1/3

12/2/2016

IslamicPopulismAcriticalapproachtostudyingpoliticalIslamMon,September192016TheJakartaPost

political Islam, especially in the Indonesian context. Vedi Hadizs Islamic Populism in
Indonesia and the Middle East manages to challenge the mainstream approach and offers
a refreshing way of studying the trajectory of political Islam in Indonesia, Egypt and
Turkey in relation to capitalist development.
Vedi traces the evolution of Islamic populism a cross-class alliance in the name of the
ummah (the Islamic masses) against elites formed in response to the contradictions of
development in the three countries under study.
Covering a period from the anti-colonial struggle all the way to the neoliberal phase of
capitalism, Vedi focuses on several key historical contingencies the early period of
nation-state building, the heyday of capitalist development during the Cold War, and the
current era of electoral democracy and neoliberalism.
Through a structuralist and comparative historical analysis, Vedi shows how material
factors class relations and conflicts in the struggle for economic resources and state
power explain the varying strategies of Islamic populist forces in the three countries,
from rebellion at the margins to an embrace of electoral democracy and market reforms.
The key element for the success of Islamic populism is whether it is able to consolidate a
cross-class alliance connecting the lower and middle classes as well as the large
bourgeoisie from a Muslim background and mainstream its politics through electoral
participation.
This is what the Turkish Justice and Development Party (AKP) has managed to do,
something which its Egyptian and Indonesian brethren the Muslim Brotherhood and
the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) have not succeeded in yet due to their lack of access
to big capital (the military in Egypt and the Chinese in Indonesia) and the relative absence
of significant Muslim capital in the two countries.
The rise of the Islamic-oriented capitalists in Turkey also known as the Anatolian
bourgeoisie was made possible due to the shift toward a more export-oriented
economic policy in 1990s, further integrating the Turkish economy into the global
market. This shift sidelined the secular yet state-dependent Kemalist bourgeoisie and
paved the way for the solidification of a cross-class alliance of Anatolian businesses,
middle-class professionals, and urban lower-classes which became AKPs social base.
It is important to note however that a particular historical context specific to Turkey
allows for the ascendency of native Turkish bourgeoisie whether it is Kemalist or
Islamic: the displacement of the Greeks, Armenians, and Jews the business-oriented
minorities in the process of post-Ottoman Turkish state formation.
Theoretically informed and empirically rich, Vedis work is a breakthrough in the study of
political Islam in Indonesia.
While his is not the first work using a Marxian or critical materialist approach in studying
political Islam in general, it is safe to say that Islamic Populism is a novel and innovative
book in the study of Indonesian political Islam.
It debunks the culturalist and essentialist view of the relationship between Islam and
modern politics in Indonesia and reorients the scholarly debate in that field.
Furthermore, while its theoretical approach is clearly materialist, it does not exclude
ideational factors. Rather, it looks at the interaction between the two and its impact on
the political articulation of Islamic populism. This is in sharp contrast with the existing
literature, which reinforces the moderate-conservative dichotomy of Indonesian Islam
and overemphasizes cultural and ideational factors in understanding it.
However, one thing is missing from Vedis work: a deeper engagement with the
comparative politics literature on religion and politics. More specifically, Vedi could have
looked at works on Christian Democracy in Western Europe (for instance by SN Kalyvas,
1996) and Hindutva or Hindu Nationalism in India (Thachil, 2011) and draw parallels
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/09/19/islamicpopulismacriticalapproachstudyingpoliticalislam.html

2/3

12/2/2016

IslamicPopulismAcriticalapproachtostudyingpoliticalIslamMon,September192016TheJakartaPost

between them and their Islamic populist brethren.

Albeit different in many ways, these religious populists share something in common: an
emphasis on cross-class alliance, the construction of civil society institutions with statelike and service-provision capacities, the religious appeal to the masses, and, in recent
years, neoliberal or market-oriented economic policies.
By engaging with this set of literature, Vedi could have challenged the myth of Islamic
exceptionalism more comprehensively and therefore strengthened his thesis.
All in all, Islamic Populism deserves appreciation for offering a fresh perspective in the
study of political Islam and analyzing its trajectory in different Muslim countries in a new
way. This is progress compared to many earlier works on political Islam, particularly in
the Indonesia context.
A critical materialist approach in studying political Islam has been long overdue and
Islamic Populism provides a good exemplar for future works in this vein.

Join the discussions

NEWS
PAPER EDITION
ACADEMIA
COMMUNITY

TRAVEL
MULTIMEDIA
LIFE
SOUTHEAST ASIA
JOBS

NEWS

TRAVEL

JOBS

email address

SUBSCRIBE

OUR PARTNERS

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/09/19/islamicpopulismacriticalapproachstudyingpoliticalislam.html

3/3