Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 30 January 2008
Received in revised form 6 April 2008
Accepted 7 May 2008
Ventilation principles that integrate exible and responsive elements have grown in popularity in ofce
buildings due to increasing concerns about the impact of indoor environment quality on ofce workers
well-being and productivity, as well as concerns over the rising energy costs for space heating and
cooling in the ofce building sector. Such advanced elements as underoor air distribution (UFAD), passive
swirl diffusers, and demand controlled ventilation have posed challenges to system design and operation. This paper is concerned with the development and implementation of a practical and robust
optimization scheme, aiming to assist ofce building designers and operators to enhance thermal
comfort and indoor air quality (IAQ) without sacricing energy costs of ventilation. The objective function
was constructed in a way attempting to aggregate and weight indices (for thermal comfort, IAQ, and
ventilation energy usage assessment) into one indicator. The path taken was a simulation-based optimization approach by using computational uid dynamics (CFD) techniques in conjunction with genetic
algorithm (GA), with the integration of an articial neural network (ANN) for response surface approximation (RSA) and for speeding up tness evaluations inside GA loop.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Ofce indoor environment
Ventilation system
CFD simulation
Articial neural network
Genetic algorithm
1. Introduction
Ventilation systems satisfy air quality and thermal comfort
requirements in ofce spaces by delivering conditioned air (return
air plus outdoor fresh air). Despite the fact that modern ventilation
systems strive to offer the capacity for subtle indoor climate control,
thermal conditions in ofce spaces are still far from satisfactory.
Every year, the international facility management association (IFMA)
announces survey data, identifying that predominant ofce occupants complaints are its too hot and too cold, simultaneously [1].
Triggered by the advent of the energy crisis in the early 1970s,
emphases have been put on the energy efciency of ofce buildings. Space conditioning contributes substantially to energy
consumption in ofce buildings. In 2004, approximately 60% of the
total energy consumed by Canadian commercial/institutional
buildings was used for space heating and cooling [2]. To reduce this
high energy cost, ofce building design has shifted towards high
levels of insulation and air tightness, and minimal ventilation rate
as well. However, this led to the deterioration in IAQ and raised the
problem of sick building syndrome (SBS) [3,4]. Previous research also
revealed that the risk of SBS and associated sick-leave rates were
strongly correlated with ventilation rates in ofce buildings [3,4].
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 1 514 848 2424x7257; fax: 1 514 848 7965.
E-mail address: grace_zhouliang@yahoo.com (L. Zhou).
0360-1323/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.009
652
50a
Real value
0.8
0.2
2
Stochastic uniform
Fitness-based replacement
Reach 100 generationsb/exceed 50
stall generations
a
Population size of 50 was found to be sufcient in terms of maintaining population diversity and avoiding excessive computational cost.
b
After 100 generations, no improvement was found in the cases studied here.
653
654
3. Assessment indices
Accurate and quantitative evaluation of indoor environment can be
only realized by considering reasonable independent variables and by
selecting appropriate criteria to assess the objectives of interest. Based
on a literature survey, the following indicators were selected in the
current study to cover all the issues under consideration. These indices
were calculated based on output quantities from CFD simulation and
were integrated into the objective function for optimization.
3.1. Predicted mean vote (PMV) for overall thermal comfort
assessment
The PMV model [19] is the most frequently used and bestunderstood model for quantitative thermal comfort analysis. PMV
reects the mean vote of a large group of occupants who are
exposed to a given combination of thermal parameters. PMV index
evaluates thermal environment in an indoor space by using
a thermal sensation range scale: 3 (cold), 2 (cool), 1 (slightly
cool), 0 (neutral), 1 (slightly warm), 2 (warm), 3 (hot) [19]. PMV
is dened as a function of six thermal variables related to the indoor
air conditions and human behaviors, including air temperature, air
humidity, air velocity, mean radiant temperature (Tmrt), clothing
insulation level, and human activity. The optimizer attempted to pull
the PMV value in adjacent to the occupant closer to neutral value.
3.2. Equivalent temperature for asymmetric thermal sensation
Despite the provision of acceptable whole-body comfort level,
UFAD systems are sometimes found to cause asymmetric thermal
ET Ts Icl Q t
(1)
( C),
3v
creturn csupply
cbr csupply
(2)
where creturn is the CO2 concentration in the return air (ppm), csupply
is the CO2 concentration in the supply air (ppm), and cbr is the CO2
concentration at breathing level near the occupant (ppm).
The transportation of CO2 in room air was predicted by the CFD
simulations; furthermore, the optimizer intended to search for
better system design and operation parameters, so as to decrease
the CO2 concentration at breathing level and improve 3v as much as
possible.
655
hfan
V_ air;total
0:25
400
(4)
_ air;total cp Treturn Tsupply
Q cooling Q space Q vent m
_ fresh hout hreturn
m
(3)
where Qcooling is the total cooling load (W), Qspace is the cooling
energy portion used to remove sensible heat load in the indoor
space (W), Qvent is the cooling energy portion used to condition the
_ air;total is the total mass
outdoor fresh air to return air states (W), m
ow rate of supply air (outdoor fresh air plus the re-circulated
portion of return air) (kg/s), cp is the specic heat of air (J/kg C),
Treturn is the temperature of return air ( C), Tsupply is the tempera_ fresh is the mass ow rate of outdoor fresh
ture of supply air ( C), m
air (kg/s), and hout and hreturn are the specic enthalpy of the
outdoor air and return air (J/kg), respectively.
Accordingly, the total energy consumed by cooling can be
determined provided that the operating states of ventilation
system, the return air conditions, and the outdoor air states are
_ air;total , the
specied. Thermo-physical quantities such as Tsupply, m
mean moisture content indoors (dreturn), Treturn, and the moisture
content (dout) and the temperature (Tout) of outdoor air would be
treated as the independent variables here. One point need to be
explained is the relative humidity throughout the ofce space was
assumed to be maintained at a constant level around 40% and the
outdoor relative humidity was assumed to be at 70%. Based on the
relative humidity and air temperature, the moisture content and
enthalpy in return/outdoor air can be determined accordingly.
As a supplement to the above statement, the following
assumptions were imposed on the energy analysis for the ventilation system:
where DP is the pressure rise through the supply fan (Pa), V_ air;total is
the overall volumetric ow rate of supply air (L/s), and hfan is the fan
efciency. It is straightforward and understandable that the value
of V_ air;total can be directly extracted from the CFD model; whereas
the pressure rise and fan efciency remain to be determined.
Based on previous studies on UFAD system [25,26], the static
pressure rise via the central fan with the MS was assumed to be at
750 Pa in this study while, with the UFAD system, 562.5 Pa was the
static pressure rise assigned to the central fans (25% reduction). The
efciency of central supply fan in current study was characterized
Efan
DP V_ air;total
1000hfan
656
"
JX Min wtc
!
XABSPMVi
i
wfan
Efan
Efan max
PMVmax
!
wcooling
wiaq
3v max
3v
Ecooling
Ecooling max
#
PT
(6)
construction), ANN training/testing, sensitivity analysis (for objective function specication), and GA optimization search will be
presented.
Acknowledgements
This work was nancially supported by the funding of the
Innovations & Solutions Directorate at Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC). The authors would like to thank Dr.
E. Morofsky and Dr. S. Rastan of PWGSC for their support and for the
many inspiring suggestions.
References
[1] International Facility Management Association. Too cold and too hot rank at
top of workplace complaints; 2003. Available online: http://www.ifma.org/
tools/monthly_media/insider/2003/03_may_16.html.
[2] Natural Resources Canada. Energy use data handbook tables (Canada): Tables
2 and 3; 2005. Available online: http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/corporate/statistics/
neud/dpa/handbook_totalsectors_ca.cfm?attr0.
[3] Pejtersen J, Brohus H, Hyldaard CE. The effect of renovating an ofce building
on occupants comfort and health. Proceedings of Indoor Air, Edinburgh, vol. 2;
1999. p. 1605.
[4] Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Sundell J, Clausen G, Fanger PO. The effects of outdoor
air supply rate in an ofce on perceived air quality, Sick Building Syndrome
(SBS) symptoms and productivity. Indoor Air 2000;10:22237.
[5] Nielsen PV. Flow in air conditioned rooms. Ph.D. Thesis. Technical University of
Denmark, Copenhagen; 1974.
[6] Airpak documentation. Version 2.1. Fluent Inc; 2002.
[7] Wetter M, Wright JA. Comparison of a generalized pattern search and
a genetic algorithm optimization method. Proceedings of Building Simulation,
Eindhoven, vol. 3; 2003. p. 14018.
[8] Lu L, Cai WJ, Xie LH, Li SJ, Soh YC. HVAC system optimizationdin building
section. Energy and Buildings 2005;37:1122.
[9] Wang SW, Jin XQ. Model-based optimal control of VAV air-conditioning
system using genetic algorithm. Building and Environment 2000;35:4718.
[10] Wright JA, Loosemore HA, Farmani R. Optimization of building thermal design
and control by multi-criterion genetic algorithm. Energy and Buildings
2002;43:95972.
[11] Huang W, Lam HN. Using genetic algorithms to optimize controller parameters
for HVAC systems. Energy and Buildings 1997;26:27782.
[12] Wang WM, Zmeureanu R, Rivard H. Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Building and Environment
2005;40:151225.
[13] Sakamoto Y, Nagaiwa A, Kobayasi S, Shinozaki T. An optimization method of
district heating and cooling plant operation based on genetic algorithm.
ASHRAE Transactions 1999;105(2):10415.
[14] Chow TT, Zhang GQ, Lin Z, Song CL. Global optimization of absorption chiller
system by genetic algorithm and neural network. Energy and Buildings
2002;34:1039.
[15] Matlab documentation. Version 7.1. MathWorks Inc; 2006.
[16] Mengistu T. Aerodynamic design and optimization of turbomachinery blading.
Ph.D. Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal; 2005.
[17] Zhou L, Haghighat F. Simplied method for modelling swirl diffusers.
Proceedings of IAQVEC conference, Sendai, Japan; 2007.
[18] Zhou L, Wan MP, Chao CYH, Haghighat F. A comparison of an underoor air
distribution system and a mixing system: measurements and CFD simulations.
Proceedings of Healthy Buildings conference, Lisbon, Portugal, vol. 4; 2006. p.
299304.
[19] Fanger PO. Thermal comfort. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press; 1970.
[20] Wyon DP. Standard procedures for assessing vehicle climate with a thermal
manikin. SAE Technical Paper Series 1989.
[21] Bauman FS, Inkarojrit V, Zhang H. Laboratory test of the ARGON personal airconditioning system (APACS); 2000. Available online: http://www.argonair.
com/pdf/Argon%20Test%20Report.pdf.
[22] ASHRAE. ANSI/ASHRAE standard 55-2004: thermal environmental conditions
for human occupancy, Atlanta; 2004.
[23] Cermak R. Design strategies for personalized ventilation. Ph.D. Thesis. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen; 2004.
[24] Awbi HB. Ventilation of buildings. London: Spon Press; 2003.
[25] Webster T, Bauman FS, Ring F. Supply fan energy use in pressurized underoor
air distribution systems. Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment, University of California; 2000.
[26] Bauman FS. Underoor air distribution (UFAD) design guide. Atlanta: ASHRAE;
2003.
[27] Xu HT, Niu JL. Numerical procedure for predicting annual energy consumption
of the under-oor air distribution system. Energy and Buildings 2006;38:
6417.