Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
KEYNOTE SPEECH:
“MICRO-FINANCE/CREDIT INSTITUTION: ITS PRINCIPLES, AND RELEVANCE IN
LIBERIA’S POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION”
PRESENTED BY:
MR. GLEH HUSTON APPLETON (BBA)
NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
COMMUNITY-BASED RECOVERY PROGRAMME, ZWEDRU
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME-LIBERIA
Mr. Superintendent, and Other Government officials here present;
Members of the United Nations Family and International Non-
Governmental Institutions; The Grand Gedeh Business Community and
Members of The AMUYAN Credit Union. Other Credit Unions here
present, Distinguished Guests, My very important Audience, fellow
Liberians; Ladies and Gentlemen.
Definitions:
As we discuss the above topic, it is important that we understand what is
Micro-finance and Micro-Credit. There are several definitions of micro-
finance and micro-credit, but for our context, Micro-finance is “any small
and short-term loan, which administrative circle is usually within 3-months
per application, that helps poor people who wish to start or expand their
small businesses but, are not able to get banks to lend to them”. This
contextual definition, with great emphasis on women, is usually
administered to individuals formed in solidarity groups with the group
commitment serving as a base for loan administration. While, Micro-Credit
is the extension of small loans to individual small-business entrepreneurs too
poor to qualify for traditional bank loans. In developing countries especially,
micro-credit enables very poor people to engage in self-employment projects
that generate income. Micro-credit is the most important part of the micro-
finance field, which can comprise all other financial products such as micro-
insurance, micro-savings, etc. These micro-credit loans are usually applied
for longer periods between 3-months and 1-year respectively.
Historical Context:
It is probable that there is no definite “18th Century or earlier” origin of
micro-finance thoughts fully documented and that can be referenced as in
the case of many of our conventional disciplines such as Accounting,
Economics, Agriculture, Sociology, etc. But counting from the early
historical framework of financial practices, the concept of micro-finance can
be very closely related to the emergence of banking activities during the
“Financial Revolution in England at the second half of the 17th century,
when London's goldsmith-bankers (whose traditional role was the
fabrication of jewellery and plate) formed a system of banking through
mutual debt acceptance and inter-banker clearing which was than largely
viewed as an essential part of the formal business sector” .1 This was when
business merchants and traders, for security purposes of capital, began
micro-savings schemes of surplus bars of gold (than the medium of
exchange) with the Gold Smith for deposit in his “Vault”. Then, with the
increase in the demand from poor people for money either for emergency
consumption or trading purposes, the Gold Smith Bankers soon found
themselves able to lend as well. And from this, they became the middlemen
(intermediaries) in a developing market and began the practice of lending
for interest on borrowed capital. (You can visit the official government site of the USA's public
debt (http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpenny.htm)
In one Bangladeshi Scenario: “…a very poor woman was allowed to borrow
$50 to buy chickens so she could sell eggs in one local community. As the
chickens multiply, she was able to produce more eggs to sell. Soon she was
also able to sell the chicks. Each expansion pulled her further from the
devastation of poverty to recovery and self-sustainability”. 3
1. Poor people need a variety of financial services, not just loans. Like
everyone else, the poor need a range of financial services that are
convenient, flexible, and affordable. Depending on circumstances, they
want not only loans, but also savings, insurance, and cash transfer
services.
7. Interest rate ceilings hurt poor people by making it harder for them to
get credit. It costs much more to make many small loans than a few
large loans. Unless micro-lenders can charge interest rates that are well
above average bank loan rates, they cannot cover their costs. Their
growth will be limited by the scarce and uncertain supply of soft
money from donors or governments. When governments regulate
interest rates, they usually set them at levels so low that micro-credit
cannot cover its costs, so such regulation should be avoided. At the
same time, a micro-lender should not use high interest rates to make
borrowers cover the cost of its own inefficiency. And
While on the other hand, our donor funds should complement private
capital, not compete with it. Donors like UNDP, UNCDF, IMF, World Bank,
and other development partners should provide grants, loans, and equity for
micro-finance. Such support should be temporary. It should be used to build
the capacity of micro-finance providers; to develop supporting
infrastructure like rating agencies, credit bureaus, and audit capacity; and
to support experimentation. In some cases, serving sparse or difficult-to-
reach populations can require longer-term donor support. Donors should
try to integrate micro-finance with the rest of the financial system. They
should use experts with a track record of success when designing and
implementing projects. They should set clear performance targets that must
be met before funding is continued. Every project should have a realistic
plan for reaching a point where the donor’s support is no longer needed.
My very important Audience, let us also recall here that a key bottleneck to
the viability of micro-finance services is the shortage of strong institutions
and managers. Micro-finance is a specialized field that combines banking
with social goals. Skills and systems need to be built at all levels: to include
managers and information systems of micro-finance institutions, the central
bank of Liberia that regulates micro-finance activities, other government
agencies, and donors. Public and private investments in micro-finance
should focus on building this capacity, not just moving money.
Micro-finance has a positive impact far beyond the individual client. The
vast majority of the loans go to women because studies have shown that
women are more likely to reinvest their earnings in their businesses and in
their families. Let us also remember here that women still remain the most
vulnerable in every sphere of Liberian life and must be given the 1st priority
this time around along these lines. As families cross the poverty line and
micro-businesses expand, their communities benefit. Jobs will be created,
knowledge will be shared, civic participation will increase, and women will
be recognized as valuable members of their families and communities. If
these are upheld, the relevance of Micro-finance, as I strongly believe, will
be met in the shortest possible time playing a very significant role in
Liberia’s Post-War Reconstruction Process.
At the local Grand Gedeh level, UNDP, under her Small Arms Programme
and Community-Based Recovery Programme in conjunction with local
communities and the County Authorities launched, on January 26, 2007, the
Tchein Menyean kenneh Chiefdom Community-Based Cooperative Credit
Union with initial administrative and financial training conducted for 15
elected officials. UNDP has also provided start-up package for this initiative
as a pilot programme to introducing the concept at the County level. We like
to assure here that the initiative is purely community-based, community
driven and participatory. And that while we encourage increased private
sector involvement and participation in the socio-economic development of
Liberia, let us base our efforts on building sustainable Micro-Finance
Institutions that would attract Increased Domestic Savings, promote social
outreach to meet the needs of the poorest of the poor and as well as attract
donor confidence for capacity building.
I thank you.