Bibliografía Fonética Judicial

FORENSIC PHONETICS. THEMATIC BIBLIOGRAPHY.
BIBLIOGRAFA TEMTICA DE FONTICA JUDICIAL

Juana Gil, 2012
Esta bibliografa es el germen de un recurso electrnico puesto al servicio de todas aquellas
personas interesadas en Fontica Judicial. Cualquier nueva contribucin o correccin que
pueden dirigir a juana.gil@cchs.csic.esser muy bienvenida, as como la incorporacin de
nuevos ttulos en otras lenguas distintas del ingls y del espaol, que, por razones obvias, son
los dos idiomas en los que est escrita la mayora de los trabajos citados.
NDICE:
1 Sobre el efecto CSI..1
2 Sobre las reas de actuacin de los expertos en fontica
judicial (estudios de carcter general) 2
3 Sobre el LADO3
4 Sobre la diferenciacin de tareas y la especializacin
terminolgica.4
5 Sobre las ruedas de reconocimiento de voz y la identificacin
por testigos...4
6 Sobre los distintos mtodos de anlisis...6
7 Sobre la tcnica basada en las huellas vocales7
8 Sobre el rendimiento judicial comparado de los
diferentes parmetros.8
9 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la estructura formntica.9
10 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la F0.10
11 Sobre el rendimiento judicial del LTAS...11
12 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de los rasgos temporales
y de las pausas12
13 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la cualidad de voz...13
14 Sobre la admisibilidad y la tica de los peritajes y sobre
la formulacin de las conclusiones...14
15 Sobre la prueba pericial de voz en la legislacin espaola.16
16 Sobre la identificacin de voces disimuladas (transformacin).16
17 Sobre la identificacin de voces disimuladas (conversin)18
18 Sobre el efecto del telfono en la comparacin de voces18
19 Sobre los efectos del transcurso del tiempo: muestras
de habla no contempornea..20
20 Sobre los efectos en el habla de la intoxicacin etlica..20
Sobre el efecto CSI:
17 Cole, S. A. y Dioso-Villa, R. (2009). Investigating the CSI effect effect: Media and litigation crisis
in criminal law. Stanford Law Review, 61(6), 1335-1374.
18 Georgette, L. F. (2010). The hung jury: Scholarly consensus on the value of the CSI Effect in the
future of American justice. Intersect, 3(1), 1-20.
19 Lawson, T. F. (2009). Before the verdict and beyond the verdict: The CSI infection within modern
criminal jury trials. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 41, 121-173.
20 Podlas, K. (2006). The CSI Effect: Exposing the media myth. Fordham Intellectual Property,
Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 16, 430-465.
21 Podlas, K. (2009). The CSI effect and other forensic actions. Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment
Law Review, 27, 87-125.
Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Juana Gil. CSIC
22 Robbers, M. (2008). Blinded by science: The social construction of reality in forensic television
shows and its effect on criminal jury trials. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 84-102.
23 Schweitzer, N. J. y Saks, M. J. (2007). The CSI effect: Popular fiction about forensic science affects
the publics expectations about real forensic science. Jurimetrics, 47, 357-364.
24 Shelton, D., Barak, G. y Kim, S. J. (2007). A study of juror expectations and demands concerning
scientific evidence: Does the CSI Effect exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology
Law, 9(2), 331-368.
25 Smith, S., Patry, M. y Stinson, V. (2007). But what is the CSI effect? How crime dramas influence
peoples beliefs about forensic evidence. The Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services,
5(3/4), 187-195.
26 Stinson, V., Patry, M. y Smith, S. (2007). The CSI effect: Reflections from police and forensic
investigators. The Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 5(3/4), 25-133.
27 Tyler, T. R. (2006). Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: Managing truth and justice in reality and
fiction. The Yale Law Journal, 115, 1050-1085.
28 Wise, J. (2011). Hollywood profiling: The impact of the CSI effect on the use of forensic science in
New South Wales. Comunicacin presentada en la Expert Evidence Conference, National Judicial
College of Australia y Australian National University College of Law, Canberra.
2 Sobre las reas de actuacin de los expertos en fontica judicial (estudios de carcter
general)
29 Amino, K., Osanai, T., Kamada, T., Makinae, H. y Arai, T. (2012). Historical and procedural
overview of Forensic Speaker Recognition as a science. En A. Neustein y H. A. Patil (Eds.),
Forensic Speaker Recognition. Law Enforcement and Counter-Terrorism (pp. 3-20). Nueva York:
Springer.
30 Baldwin, J. y French, P. (1990). Forensic Phonetics. Londres: Pinter.
31 Bijhold, J., Ruifrok, A., Jessen, M., Geradts, Z., Ehrhardt, S. y Alberink, I. (2007). Forensic audio
and visual evidence 2004-2007: A review. Comunicacin presentada en el 15th INTERPOL Forensic
Science Symposium. Lyon.
32 Broeders, A. P. A. (2001). Forensic speech and audio analysis. 1999-2001. A review. Comunicacin
presentada en el 13th INTERPOL Forensic Science Symposium. Lyon.
33 Broeders, A. P. A. (2002). Forensic speech and audio analysis: The state of the art in 2000 A.D.
Acstica Forense. Revista Oficial de la Sociedad Espaola de Acstica Forense, 1, 33-42.
34 Butcher, A. (2002). Forensic Phonetics: Issues in speaker identification evidence. En Proceedings of
the Inaugural International Conference of the Institute of Forensic Studies: Forensic Evidence:
Proof and Presentation. Prato, Italia.
35 Campbell, J. P. (1997). Speaker recognition: A tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE, 85(9), 1437-1462.
36 Cicres, J. (2011). Transcripci y autenticaci de gravacions en contextos judicials. En A. M.
Fernndez Planas (Ed.), Lingstica forense (pp. 25-31). Monogrfico on line de la Revista de
Sociolingstica de la Universitat de Barcelona. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona.
http://www.ub.edu/cusc/revista/lsc/hemeroteca/numero9/lsc_actual.htm
37 Eriksson, A. (2005). Tutorial on forensic speech science. Part I: Forensic phonetics. Comunicacin
presentada en INTERSPEECH-2005. Eurospeech. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on
Speech Communication and Technology. Lisboa.
38 Fernndez Planas, A. M. (1998). Fontica forense. L'anlisi pericial de la veu com una aplicaci de
la fontica. En M. A. Pradilla (Ed.), El mn dels sons (pp. 153-166). Benicarl: Alambor.
39 Fernndez Planas, A. M (Ed.). (2011). Lingstica Forense. Monogrfico on line de Llengua,
Societat y Comunicaci. Revista de Sociolingstica de la Universitat de Barcelona, 9. Barcelona:
Universidad de Barcelona.
40 French, P. (1994). An overview of forensic phonetics with particular reference to speaker
identification. Forensic Linguistics, 1(2), 169-181.
41 French, P. y Harrison, Ph. (2006). Investigative and evidential applications of forensic speech
science. En A. Heaton-Armstrong, E. Sepherd, G. Gudjonsson y D. Wolchover (Eds.), Witness
Testimony, Psychological, Investigative and Evidential Perspectives (pp. 24762). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
42 Gold, E. (2011). Forensic speaker comparison evidence: The international picture. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2011. Viena.
43 Hammarstrom, C. (1987). Voice identification. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 19(3), 95-99.

Juana Gil. CSIC
44 Hollien, H. (1990). The Acoustics of Crime. The New Science of Forensic Phonetics. Nueva York:
Plenum Publishing Corporation.
45 Hollien, H. (2002). Forensic Voice Identification. San Diego: Academic Press.
46 Kreiman, J. y Sidtis, D. (2011). Foundations of Voice Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. (Cap. 7).
47 Knzel, H. J. (1998). Forensic speaker identification: A view from the crime lab. Comunicacin
presentada en 8th COST 250 Workshop: Speaker Identification by Man and by Machine: Directions
for Forensic Applications. Ankara.
48 Knzel, H. J. (2004). Tasks in forensic speech and audio analysis: A tutorial. The Phonetician, 90, 922.
49 Meuwly. D. (2000). Voice analysis. En J. Siegel, P. Saukko y G. Knupfer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of
Forensic Science (pp. 1413-1420). Londres: Academic Press.
50 Nolan, F. J. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
51 Nolan, F. (1991). Forensic Phonetics. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 483-493.
52 Nolan, F. J. (1994). Auditory and acoustic analysis in speaker recognition. En J. Gibbons (Ed.),
Language and the Law (pp. 326-345). Londres / NuevaYork: Longman,
53 Nolan, F. J. (1997). Speaker recognition and forensic phonetics. En W. J. Hardcastle y J. Laver
(Eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 744-767). Oxford: Blackwell.
54 Olsson, J. (2004). Forensic Linguistics. An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. Londres:
Continuum. (Cap. 11).
55 Rodrguez Bravo, . (1998). La identificacin de la voz humana. Revista Catalana de Seguretat
Pblica, 3, 97-99.
56 Rose, Ph. (2002). Forensic Speaker Identification. Londres: Taylor & Francis.
57 Watt, D. (2010). The identification of the individual through speech. En C. Llamas y D. Watt (Eds.),
Language and Identities (pp. 76-85). Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
3 Sobre el LADO
58 Broeders, A.P.A. (2010). Decision-making in LADO: A view from the forensic arena. En K. Zwaan,
P. Muysken y M. Verrips (Eds.), Language and Origin. The Role of Language in European Asylum
Procedures: A Linguistic and Legal Survey (pp. 51-60). Nimega: Wolf Legal Publishers.
59 Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2010). The role of linguists and native speakers in language analysis for the
determination of speaker origin. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(1), 6793.
60 Eades, D., Fraser, H., Siegel, J., McNamara, T. y Baker, B. (2003). Linguistic identification in the
determination of nationality: A preliminary report. Language Policy, 2(2), 179-199.
61 Eades, D. (2009). Testing the claims of asylum seekers: The role of language analysis. Language
Assessment Quarterly, 6, 30-40.
62 Eades, D. (2010a). Guidelines from linguists for LADO. En K. Zwaan, P. Muysken y M. Verrips
(Eds.), Language and Origin. The Role of Language in European Asylum Procedures: A Linguistic
and Legal Survey (pp. 35-41). Nimega: Wolf Legal Publishers.
63 Eades, D. (2010b). Language analysis and asylum cases. En M. Coulthard y A. Johnson (Eds.),
Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 411-422). Londres: Routledge.
64 Foulkes, P. y Wilson, K. (2011). Language analysis for the determination of origin: An empirical
study. Comunicacin presentada en el XVII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. HongKong.
65 Fraser, H. (2009). The role of 'educated native speakers' in providing language analysis for the
determination of the origin of asylum seekers. International Journal of Speech, Language and the
Law, 16(1), 113-138.
66 Language and Asylum Research Group. (2011). LADO Bibliography. University of Essex.
http://www.essex.ac.uk/larg/resources/bibliography.aspx
67 LNOG - Language and National Origin Group. (2004). Guidelines for the use of language analysis in
relation to questions of national origin in refugee cases. International Journal of Speech, Language
and the Law, 11(2), 261-66.
68 Maryns, K. (2004). Identifying the asylum speaker: Reflections on the pitfalls of language analysis in
the determination of national origin. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2),
240-260.

Juana Gil. CSIC
69 Moosmller, S. (2010). IAFPA position on language analysis in asylum procedures. En K. Zwaan, P.

Muysken y M. Verrips (Eds.), Language and Origin. The Role of Language in European Asylum
Procedures: A Linguistic and Legal Survey (pp. 43-47). Nimega: Wolf Legal Publishers.
70 Morgades, S. (2010). The asylum procedure in Spain: The role of language in determining the origin
of asylum seekers. En K. Zwaan, P. Muysken y M. Verrips (Eds.), Language and Origin. The Role of
Language in European Asylum Procedures: A Linguistic and Legal Survey (pp. 159-175). Nimega:
Wolf Legal Publishers.
71 Patrick, P. L. (2010). Language variation and LADO (Language Analysis for Determination of
Origin). En K. Zwaan, P. Muysken y M. Verrips (Eds.), Language and Origin. The Role of Language
in European Asylum Procedures: A Linguistic and Legal Survey (pp. 73-87). Nimega: Wolf Legal
Publishers.
72 Reath, A. (2004). Language analysis in the context of the asylum process: Procedures, validity and
consequences. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 209-233.
73 Tax, B. (2010). The use of expert evidence in asylum procedures by EU member states - the case for
harmonised procedural safeguards. En K. Zwaan, P. Muysken y M. Verrips (Eds.), Language and
Origin. The Role of Language in European Asylum Procedures: A Linguistic and Legal Survey (pp.
225-232). Nimega: Wolf Legal Publishers.
74 Wilson, K. (2009). Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin: Native Speakers vs. Trained
Linguists. MSc dissertation in Linguistics, University of York.
4 Sobre la diferenciacin de tareas y la especializacin terminolgica

75 Bimbot, F., Chollet, G. y Paoloni, A. (Eds.) (1995). Special section on automatic speaker recognition,
identification and verification. Speech Communication, 17(1-2), 81-298.
76 Bricker, P. D. y Pruzansky, S. (1976). Speaker recognition. En N. J. Lass (Ed.), Conteporary Issues in
Experimental Phonetics (pp. 295-326). Londres: Academic Press.
77 Broeders, A. P. A. (2004). Forensic speech and audio analysis forensic linguistics. A review: 20012004. Comunicacin presentada en el 14th INTERPOL Forensic Science Symposium. Lyon.
78 French, J. P. y Harrison, P. (2007). Position statement concerning use of impressionistic likelihood
terms in forensic speaker comparison cases. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law,
14, 137-144.
79 French, J. P., Nolan, F., Foulkes, P. y McDougall, K. (2010). The UK position statement on forensic
speaker comparison: A rejoinder to Rose and Morrison. International Journal of Speech, Language
and the Law, 17(1), 143-152.
80 Jessen, M. (2007). Speaker classification in forensic phonetics and acoustics. En C. Mller (Ed.),
Speaker Classification I: Fundamentals, Features, and Methods (pp. 180204). Berln: Springer.
81 Jin, M. y Yoo, Ch. (2010). Speaker verification and identification. En L. Wang, y X. Geng (Eds.),
Behavioral Miometrics for Human Identification: Intelligent Applications (pp. 264-289). Hershey,
Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
82 Knzel, H. J. (1995). Field procedures in forensic speaker recognition. En J. Windsor Lewis (Ed.),
Studies in General and English Phonetics. Essays in Honour of Prof. J. D. OConnor (pp. 68-83).
Londres: Routledge.
83 Mller, C. (Ed.) (2007). Speaker Classification. Berln: Springer, vols. I y II.
84 Rose, P. y Morrison, G. S. (2009). A response to the UK position statement on forensic speaker
comparison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 16, 139-163.
5 Sobre las ruedas de reconocimiento de voz y la identificacin por testigos

85 Barry, M. C. (2008). Conducting a voice parade: Methods and assumptions. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2008. Lausanne.
86 Barry, M. C. (2009). Methodological failures in police conduct of a voice parade. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
87 Bastiaansen, M., Rietveld, A. C. M., y Broeders, A. P. A. (1996). Repeated testing in auditory
identification by witnesses. Comunicacin presentada en el 1996 Annual Meeting of the
International Association for Forensic Phonetics, Wiesbaden.
88 Braun, A. (1996). Age estimation by different listener groups. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 6573.

Juana Gil. CSIC
89 Broeders, A. P. A. (1996). Earwitness identication: Common ground, disputed territory, and

uncharted areas. Forensic Linguistics 3(1), 113.
90 Broeders, A. P. A., Cambier-Langeveld, T. y Vermeulen, J. (2002). Arranging a voice lineup in a
foreign language. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(1), 104-112.
91 Broeders, A. P. A. y Rietveld, A. C. M. (1995). Speaker identification by earwitnesses. En A. Braun
y J.-P. Kster (Eds.), Studies in Forensic Phonetics (pp. 24-40). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher.
92 Broeders, A. P. A. y Van Amelsvoort, A. G. (2001). A practical approach to forensic earwitness
identification: Constructing a voice lineup. En J. Wjcikiewicz (Ed.), Problems of Forensic Sciences:
Proceedings of EAFS Meeting (pp. 237-245). Cracovia.
93 Bull, R. y Clifford, B. R. (1984). Earwitness voice recognition accuracy. En G. L. Wells y F. Loftus
(Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 92-123). Nueva York: Cambridge
University Press.
94 Bull, R. y Clifford, B. R. (1999a). Earwitness testimony. En A. Heaton-Armstrong, E. Shepherd y D.
Wolhover (Eds.), Analysing Witness Testimony: A Guide for Legal Practitioners and Other
Professionals (pp. 194-206). Londres: Blackstone Press.
95 Bull, R. y Clifford, B. R. (1999b). Earwitness testimony. Medicine, Science, and Law, 39(2), 120127.
96 Butcher, A. (1996). Getting the voice line-up right: Analysis of a multiple auditory confrontation. En
P. McCormack y A. Russell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Australian International Conference on
Speech Science and Technology (pp. 97-102). Adelaida: Flinders University.
97 Clifford, B. R. (1983), Memory for voices: The feasibility and quality of earwitness evidence. En S.
M. A. Lloyd-Bostock y B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating Witness Evidence (pp. 189-218). Toronto:
Wiley.
98 Clifford, B. R., Rathbor, H. Y Bull, R. (1981). The effects of delay on voice recognition accuracy.
Law and Human Behavior, 5, 201-208.
99 Cort, S. y Murry, T. (1972). Aural identification of childrens voices. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 51, 131(A).
100 De Jong, G. (1998). Earwitness Characteristics and Speaker Identification Accuracy. Ann Arbor, MI:
Dissertation-Abstracts-International.
101 Eriksson, A. y hman, L. (2008). All ears. An earwitness research program. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2008. Lausana.
102 Goggin, J. P., Thompson, C. P., Strube, G. y Simental, L. R. (1991). The role of language familiarity
in voice identification. Memory and Cognition, 19, 448-58.
103 Goldstein, A. G., Knight, P., Bailis, K. y Conover, J. (1981). Recognition memory for accented and
unaccented voices. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 217-20.
104 Hjortshj Srensen, M. (2009). Voice line-ups: Some voices are easier to remember than others and
some people are better at it. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
105 Hollien, H. (1996). Consideration of guidelines for earwitness lineups. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1),
1423.
106 Hollien H., Huntley R., Knzel, H. J. y Hollien P. A. (1995). Criteria for earwitness lineups.
Forensic Linguistics, 2(2), 143-15.
107 Kapardis, A. (2010). Psychology and Law: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 3 edic.
108 Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J. M., Van Amelsvoort, A. G. y Broeders, A. P .A. (2004). Earwitnesses:
Effects of speech duration, retention intervals and acoustic environment. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 18(3), 327-336.
109 Kster, O., Hess, M. M., Schiller, N. O. y Knzel, H. J. (1998). The correlation between auditory
speech sensitivity and speaker recognition ability. Forensic Linguistics, 5(2), 22-32.
110 Kster, O., Jessen, M., Khairi, F. y Eckert, H. (2007). Auditory-perceptual identification of voice
quality by expert and non-expert listeners. Comunicacin presentada en el XVIth International
Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrcken.
111 Kster, O. y Kster, J.-P. (2004). The auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice quality in forensic
speaker recognition. The Phonetician, 89, 937.
112 Kster, O., Schiller, N. O. y Knzel, H. J. (1995). The influence of native-language background on
speaker recognition. En K. Elenius y P. Branderud (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International
Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 3 (pp. 306-9), Estocolmo: KTH y Stockholm University.
113 Kster, O. y Schiller, N. O. (1997). Different influences of the native language of a listener on
speaker recognition. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 4, 18-28.
114 Kreiman, J., Gerrat, B. R., Precoda, K. y Berke, G. S. (1992). Individual differences in voice quality
perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(5), 1220.

Juana Gil. CSIC
115 Knzel, H. J. (1994). On the problem of speaker identification by victims and witnesses. Forensic
Linguistics, 1(1), 45-58.
116 Ladefoged, P. (1978). Expectation affects identification by listening. Language and Speech, 21(4),
373-374.
117 Ladefoged P. y Ladefoged J. (1980). The ability of listeners to identify voices. UCLA Working Papers
in Phonetics, 49, 43-51.
118 Mc Gehee, F. (1937). The reliability of the identification of the human voice . Journal of General
Psychology, 17, 249-271.
119 McGehee, F. (1944). An experimental study of voice recognition. Journal of General Psychology,
31, 53-65.
120 Manzanero, A. L. (2010). Memoria de testigos: Obtencin y valoracin de la prueba
testifical. Madrid: Pirmide.
121 Michel, F. J. (1980). Use of the voice line-up. Convention Abstracts of the American Academy of
Forensic Sciences, 937 (A).
122 Nolan, F. y Grabe, E. (1996). Preparing a voice line-up. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 74-94.
123 Nolan, F. (2003). A recent voice parade. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law,
10(2), 277-291.
124 Papcun, G., Kreiman, J. y Davis, A. (1989). Long-term memory for unfamiliar voices. Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 85, 913-925.
125 Rodrguez Bravo, A. (2005). Identificacin perceptiva de locutores para la acstica forense.
Comunicacin presentada en el III Congreso de la Sociedad Espaola de Acstica Forense, Santiago
de Compostela.
126 Saslove, H. y Yarmey, A. D. (1980). Long-term auditory memory: Speaker identification. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 65, 111116.

127 Schiller, N.O. y Kster, O. (1998). The ability of expert witnesses to identify voices: a comparison
between trained an untrained listeners. Forensic Linguistics, 5(1), 1-9.
128 Schlichting, F. y Sullivan, K. P. H. (1997). The imitated voice a problem for voice line-ups?
129 Stuart Laubstein, A. (1997). Problems of voice line-ups. Forensic Linguistics, 4(2), 262-279.
130 Van Lancker, D. y Kreiman, J. (1985). Unfamiliar voice discrimination and familiar voice
recognition are independent and unordered habilities. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 62, 50-60.
131 Yarmey, A. D. (1995). Earwitness and evidence obtained by other senses. En R. Bull y D. Carson
(Eds.), Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts (pp. 261-273). Chichester: Wiley.
132 Yarmey, A. D. (2001). Earwitness descriptions and speaker identification. Forensic Linguistics 8(1),
113-122.
133 Zetterholm, E., Sarwar, F. y Allwood, C. M. (2010). Earwitnesses: The effect of type of voice lineup
in identification accuracy and the realism in confidence judgments. En S. Schtz y G. Ambrazaitis
(Eds.), Lund University Centre for Languages and Literature Working Papers, 54, (Proceedings from
Fonetik 2010), 113-119.
6 Sobre los distintos mtodos de anlisis

134 Benzeghiba, M., De Mori, R., Deroo, O., Dupont, S., Erbes, T., Jouvet, D., Fissore, L., Laface, L.,
Mertins, A., Ris, C., Rose, R., Tyagi, V. y Wellekens, C. (2007). Automatic speech recognition and
speech variability: A review. Speech Communication, 49(10-11), 763-786.
135 Broeders, A. P. A. (2000). Speech as a biometric: Separating the goats from the sheep? En C. M.
Breur, M. M. Kommer, J. F. Nijboer y J. M. Reijntjes (Eds.), New Trends in Criminal Investigation
and Evidence II (pp. 83-94). Amberes: Intersentia.
136 Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2007). Current methods in forensic speaker identification: Results of a
collaborative exercise. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 14(2), 223-243.
137 Chollet, G. (1994). Automatic speech and speaker recognition: Overview, current issues and
perspectives. En E. Keller (Ed.), Fundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition. Basic
Concepts, State of the Art and Future Challenges (pp. 129-148). Chichester, R.U.: John Wiley &
Sons.
138 Cosi, P. (1982). Speaker recognition: A survey. En J. P. Haton (Ed.), Automatic Speech Analysis and
Recognition (pp. 277-308). Dordrecht: Reidel.
139 Doddington, G. (1985). Speaker recognition. Identifying people by their voices. Proceedings of the
IEEE, 73, 1651-1664.

Juana Gil. CSIC
140 Doddington, G., Liggett, W., Martin, A., Przybocki, M. Y Reynolds, D. A. (1998). Sheep, goats,
lambs and wolves: A statistical analysis of speaker performance. En 5th International Conference on
Spoken Language Processing. Sydney: ISCA.
141 Eriksson, A. (2012). Aural/acoustic vs. automatic methods in forensic phonetic case work. En A.
Neustein y H. A. Patil (Eds.), Forensic Speaker Recognition. Law Enforcement and CounterTerrorism (pp. 41-69). Nueva York: Springer.
142 Fandez, M. y Monte, E. (2005). State-of-the-art in speaker recognition. IEEE Aerospace and
Electronic Systems Magazine, 20(5), 7-12.
143 Furui, S. (1996). An overview of speaker recognition technology. En C. H. Lee, F. K. Soong y K. K.
Paliwal (Eds.), Automatic Speech and Speaker Recognition (pp. 31-56). Dordrecth: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
144 Hollien, H., Bennett, G. T. y Gelfer, M. P. (1983). Criminal identification comparison: Aural vs.
visual identifications resulting from a simulated crime. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 28, 208-221.
145 Hollien, H. y Schwartz, R. (2000). Aural-perceptual speaker identification: Problems with noncontemporary samples. Forensic Linguistics 7(2), 199-211.
146 Jessen, M. (2009). Forensic phonetics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 671-711.
147 Knzel, H. J. (1994). Current approaches to forensic speaker recognition. En Proceedings of the
ESCA Workshop on Automatic Speaker Recognition, Identification and Verification (pp. 135-142).
Martigny, Suiza,
148 Lucena, J. y Daz, J. J. (2000). Evaluacin del sistema de reconocimiento automtico de locutores
IdentiVox 2000 con la base de datos AHUMADA. Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad Espaola de
Acstica Forense, 183-192.
149 Meuwly, D. (2001). Reconnaissance de locuteurs: Lapport dune aproche automatique. Tesis
Doctoral, Universidad de Lausanne.
150 Meuwly, D. (2006). Forensic individualization from biometric data. Science and Justice, 46(4), 205
213.
151 Moreno, A., Garca Gomar, M., Bautista, R. y Castao, J. (2005). Influencia de variables en el
reconocimiento automtico de locutor. Comunicacin presentada en el III Congreso de la Sociedad
Espaola de Acstica Forense, Santiago de Compostela.
152 Nolan, F. (1990). The limitations of auditory-phonetic speaker identification. En H. Kniffka (Ed.),
Texte zur Theorie und Praxis forensischer Linguistik (pp. 457-479). Tubinga: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
153 Nolan, F. (1994). Auditory and acoustic analysis in speaker recognition. En J. Gibbons (Ed.),
Language and the Law (pp. 326-345). Londres: Longman.
154 Ortega, J., Cruz, S. y Gonzlez, J. (1998). Quantitative influence of speech variability factors for
automatic speaker verification in forensic tasks. En CSLP 98 Conference Proceedings CD-ROM. The
5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Sydney: Causal Productions.
155 Ortega, J. y Gonzlez, J. (1994). Robust speech modeling for speaker identification in forensic
acoustics. En European Speech Communication Association (Ed.), Workshop on Automatic Speaker
Recognition and Verification (pp. 217-220). Martigny: ESCA.
156 Ramos, D. (2007). Forensic Evaluation of the Evidence Using Automatic Speaker Recognition
Systems, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Autnoma de Madrid, Madrid.
157 Rose, P. (2006). Technical forensic speaker recognition: Evaluation, types and testing of
evidence. Computer Speech and Language, 20(2-3), 159-191.
158 Schmidt-Nielsen, A. y Crystal, T. H. (1998). Human vs, machine speaker identification with
telephone speech. En R. H. Mannell y J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.), Proceedings of the International
Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 222-225). Sydney: Australian Speech Science and
Technology Association Incorporated (ASSTA).
159 Stevens, K. N., Williams, C. E., Carbonelli, J. R. y Woods B. (1968). Speaker authentication and
identification: A comparison of spectrographic and auditory presentations of speech material. Journal
of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 1596-1607.
160 Wayman, J. L. (2001). Theory, characterization and testing of general biometric technologies.
Comunicacin presentada en 2001-A Speaker Odyssey. Creta.
7 Sobre la tcnica basada en las huellas vocales

161 Black, J. W., Lashbrook, W., Nash, E., Oyer, H. J., Pedrey, C., Tosi, O. y Truby, H. (1973). Reply to
'Speaker identification by speech spectrograms: Some further observations'. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 54(2), 535-537.

Juana Gil. CSIC
162 Bolt, R. H., Cooper, F. S., David, E. E., Denes, P. B., Pickett, J. y Stevens, K. N. (1969).
Identification of a speaker by speech spectrograms. Science, 166, 338-343.
163 Bolt, R. H., Cooper, F. S., David, E. E., Denes, P. B., Pickett, J. y Stevens, K. N. (1970). Speaker
identification by speech spectrograms: A scientists' view of its reliability for legal purposes. Journal
of the Acoustical Society of America, 47(2), 597-612.
164 Bolt, R. H., Cooper, F. S., David, E. E., Denes, P. B., Pickett, J. y Stevens, K. N. (1973). Speaker
identification by speech spectrograms: some further observations. Journal of the Acoustical Society
of America, 54(2), 531-534.
165 Bolt, R. H., Cooper, F. S., Green, D., Hamlet, S. L., Hogan, D. L., Mc Knight, J. G., Pickett, J. M.,
Tosi, O. y Underwood, B. D. (1979). On the theory and practice of voice identification. Technical
report. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.
166 Endres, W., Bambach, W. y Flosser, G. (1971). Voice spectrograms as a function of age, voice
disguise and voice imitation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1842-1848.
167 Greene, B. G., Pisoni, D. B. y Carell, T. D. (1984). Recognition of speech spectrograms. Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America, 76(1), 32-43.
168 Gruber, J. S. y Poza, F. T. (1995). Voicegram Identification Evidence. American Jurisprudence
Trials, vol. 54. Nueva York: Lawyer Cooperative Publishing.
169 Hazen, B. (1973). Effects of differing phonetic contexts on spectrographic speaker
identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(3), 650-660.
170 Hecker. M. (1971). Speaker Recognition: An Interpretive Survey of the Literature. Nueva York:
American Speech and Hearing Association Monographs, 16.
171 Kersta, L. (1962). Voiceprint identification. Nature, 196, 1253-1257.
172 Koenig, B. (1986). Spectrographic voice identification: A forensic survey. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 79(6), 2088-2090.
173 Ladefoged, P. (1971). An opinion on 'voiceprints'. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 19, 84-87.
174 Ladefoged, P. y Vanderslice, R. (1967). The voiceprint mystique. UCLA Working Papers in
Phonetics, 7, 126-142.
175 Lindh, J. (2004). Handling the "voiceprint" issue. En Proceedings of Fonetik 2004. Universidad de
Estocolmo, Estocolmo.
176 McDermott, M. C., Owen, T. y McDermott, F. M. (1996). Voice identification. The AuralSpectrographic Method. Nueva York: Owl Investigations, Inc.
177 Meuwly, D. (2003a). Le mythe de Lempreinte vocale (I). Revue Internationale de Criminologie
et de Police Technique et Scientifique, 56(2), 219236.
178 Meuwly, D. (2003b). Le mythe de Lempreinte vocale (II). Revue Internationale de Criminologie
et de Police Technique et Scientifique, 61(3), 361374.
179 National Research Council. (1979). On the Theory and Practice of Voice Identification. Washington:
National Academy of Sciences.
180 Pollack, I., Pickett, J. y Sumby, W. H. (1954). On the identification of speakers by voice. Journal of
181 Schwartz, R. (2006). Voiceprints in the United States Why they wont go away. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2006, Gotemburgo.
182 Stevens, K. N., Williams, C. E., Carbonell, J. R. y Woods, B. (1968). Speaker authentication and
identification: A comparison of spectrographic and auditory presentations of speech material. Journal
of the Acoustical Society of America, 44(6), 15961607.
183 Tosi, O. I. (1979). Voice Identification. Theory and Legal Applications. Baltimore: University Park
Press.
8 Sobre el rendimiento judicial comparado de los diferentes parmetros

184 Brown, R. (1981). An experimental study of the relative importance of acoustic parameters for
auditory speaker recognition. Language and Speech, 24, 293-351.
185 Doddington, G. (1985). Speaker recognition - Identifying people by their voices. Proceedings of the
IEEE, 73, 1651-1664.
186 Doherty, E. T. (1975). Evaluation of selected acoustic parameters for use in speaker identification.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, S 107.
187 Doherty, E. T. y Hollien, H. (1978). Multiple-factor speaker identification of normal and distorted
speech. Journal of Phonetics, 6, 1-8.

Juana Gil. CSIC
188 Itoh, K. y Saito, S. (1982). Effects of acoustical feature parameters of speech on perceptual
identification of speaker. Transactions of the Institute of Electronics and Communication Engineers
of Japan, J65-A, 101-108.
189 Kuwabara, H. y Sagisaka, Y. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of speaker individuality: Control and
conversion. Speech Communication, 16(2), 165-173.
190 Rosas, C. Y Sommerhoff, J. (2010). Implicancias y proyecciones forenses en el anlisis de la voz.
Estudios Filolgicos, 46, 101-118.
191 Schriberg, E. (2007). Higher level features in speaker recognition. En C. Mller (Ed.), Speaker
classification I. (pp. 241-59). Berln: Springer.
192 Stevens, K. N. (1972). Sources of inter- and intra- speaker variability in the acoustic properties of
speech sounds. En ICPhS 1972. Proceedings of the 7 th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
(pp. 206-32). La Haya: Mouton.
193 Van Dommelen, W. A. (1990). Acoustic parameters in human speaker recognition. Language and
Speech, 33, 259-272.
194 Wolf, J. J. (1972). Efficient acoustic parameters for speaker recognition. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 51, 2044-2056.
9 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la estructura formntica

195 Albal, M. J., Battaner, E., Carranza, M., Gil, J., Llisteri, J., Machuca, M. J., Marrero, V. y Ros, A.
(2008). VILE: Nuevos datos acsticos sobre vocales del espaol. Language Design. Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics. Special Issue: New Trends in Experimental Phonetics, 114.
196 Alderman, T. (2005). Forensic Speaker Identification: A Likelihood Ratio-based Approach Using
Vowel Formants. Munich: Lincom Europa.
197 Bachorowski, J. A. y Owren, M. J. (1999). Acoustic correlates of talker sex and individual talker
identity are present in a short vowel segment produced in running speech. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 106(2), 105463.
198 Battaner, E., Carb, C., Gil, J., Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., Madrigal, N., Marrero, V., de la Mota,
C., Riera, M. y Ros, A. (2005). VILE: Estudio acstico de la variacin inter- e intralocutor en
espaol. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 35, 435-436.
199 Cerd, R. (2011). Creus que la teva veu s nica? En A. M. Fernndez Planas (Ed.), Lingstica
forense (pp. 32-40). Nmero monogrfico de la Revista de Sociolingstica de la Universitat de
Barcelona.
Barcelona:
Universidad
de
Barcelona.
http://www.ub.edu/cusc/revista/lsc/hemeroteca/numero9/lsc_actual.htm.
200 Cerd, R., Farrs, M., Hernando, J. y Veyrat, M. (2007). Propuesta de experimento sobre la nocin
de campo de dispersin fonemtica. Actas do III Congreso da Sociedade Espaola de Acstica
Forense, 127-139.
201 Eriksson, E. J., Cepeda, L. F., Rodman, R. D., McAllister, D. F., Bitzer, D. y Arroway, P. (2004).
Cross-language speaker identification using spectral moments. En P. Branderud, O. Engstrand y H.
Traunmller (Eds.), Proceedings of FONETIK 2004, The Seventeenth Swedish Phonetics Conference
(pp. 76-79). Estocolmo: Stockholm University.
202 Greisbach, R., Esser, O. y Weinstock, C. (1995). Speaker identification by formant contours. En A.
Braun y J.-P. Kster (Eds.), Studies in Forensic Phonetics (pp. 49-55). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher
Verlag.
203 Ingram, J. Prandolini, R. y Ong, S. (1996). Formant trajectories as indices of phonetic variation for
speaker identification. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 129-145.
204 Jessen, M. (2008). Continuous vs. categorical variations between speakers. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2008. Lausanne.
205 Jessen, M. y Becker, T. (2010). Long-Term Formant Distribution as a phonetic-forensic feature.
Comunicacin presentada en ASA 2nd Pan-American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics, Cancn.
206 Kasuya, H., Tan, X. y Yang, C.-S. (1994). Voice source and vocal tract characteristics associated
with speaker individuality. En Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language
Processing (pp. 145962). Yokohama: Acoustical Society of Japan.
207 Kinoshita, Y. (2001). Testing Realistic Forensic Speaker Identification in Japanese: A Likelihood
Ratio Based Approach Using Formants. Tesis Doctoral. Department of Linguistics, The Australian
National University.

Juana Gil. CSIC
208 Marrero, V., Gil, J. y Battaner, E. (2003). Inter-speaker variation in Spanish. An experimental and
acoustic preliminary approach. En Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic
Sciences (pp. 703-06), Barcelona: UAB / Casual Productions.
209 Marrero. V., Battaner, E., Gil, J., Llisterri, J., Machuca, M., Marquina, N., de la Mota, C. y Ros,
A. (2008). Identifying speaker-dependent acoustic parameters in Spanish vowels. En Proceedings of
Acoustics'08 (pp. 5673- 5677). Pars: Acoustical Society of America - European Acoustics
Association - Societ Franaise d'Acoustique.
210 McDougall, K. (2004). Speaker-specific formant dynamics: An experiment on Australian English /a/.
International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(1), 103-130.
211 McDougall, K. (2006). Dynamic features of speech and the characterisation of speakers.
212 Molina de Figueiredo, R. (1995). Speaker identification using a spectral moments metrica with the
voiceless fricative /s/. Comunicacin presentada en el XIII International Congress of Phonetic
Sciences. Estocolmo.
213 Moos, A. (2008). Long Term Formant Distribution based on German spontaneous and read speech.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2008. Lausana.
214 Morrison, G. S. y Kinoshita, Y. (2008). Automatic-type calibration of traditionally derived
Likelihood Ratios: Forensic analysis of Australian English /o/ formant trajectories. En
INTERSPEECH-2008. ISCA: Brisbane, 1501-1504.
215 Morrison, G. S. (2008). Forensic voice comparison using likelihood ratios based on polynomial
cur
International Journal of Speech,
Language and the Law, 15, 249266.
216 Morrison, G. S. (2009). Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations
of the formant trajectories of diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2387
2397.
217 Nolan, F. y Grigoras, C. (2004). Formant analysis in forensic speaker identification: A justification
and a new method. Comunicacin presentada al Congreso de la IAFPA 2004. Helsinki.
218 Nolan, F. y Grigoras, C. (2005). A case for formant analysis in forensic speaker identification.
219 Hughes, V., McDougall, K. y Foulkes, P. (2009). Diphthong dynamics in unscripted speech.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
220 Rodman, R., McAllister, D., Bitzer, D., Cepeda, L. y Abbitt, P. (2002). Forensic speaker
identification based on spectral moments, Forensic Linguistics, 9(1), 2243.
221 Rose, Ph.. Osanai, T. y Kinoshita, Y. (2003). Strength of forensic speaker identification evidence:
Multi-speaker formant- and cepstrum-based segmental discrimination with a Bayesian likelihood
ratio as threshold. Forensic Linguistics, 10(2), 179-202.
222 Rose, Ph. (2006). The intrinsic forensic discriminatory power of diphthongs. En P. Warren y C. I.
Watson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Sciences and
Technology (pp.492-497). Auckland: University of Auckland.
223 Rose, P., Kinoshita, Y. y Alderman, T. (2006). Realistic extrinsic forensic speaker discrimination
with the diphtong /aI/. Proceedings of the 11th Australasian International Conference on Speech
Sciences and Technology (pp. 329-334). Sydney: University of Sydney.
10 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la F0

224 Aberton, E. y Fourcin, A. J. (1978). Intonation and speaker identification. Language and Speech, 21,
305-318.
225 Adami, A. G. (2007). Modelling prosodic differences for speaker recognition. Speech
Communication, 49, 277-291.
226 Atal, B. S. (1972). Automatic speaker recognition based on pitch contours. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 52, 1687-1697.
227 Atkinson, J. E. (1976). Inter- and intraspeaker variability in fundamental voice frequency. Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 440-445.
228 Barlow, M. G. (1993). Prosodic Acoustic Correlates of Speaker Characteristics. Dissertation
Abstracts International, Ann Arbor, 54.
229 Barry, W. J., Goldsmith, M., Fourcin, A. J. y Fuller, H. (1991). Stability of voice frequency measures
in speech. En Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 38-41). Aixen-Provence.
10

Juana Gil. CSIC
230 Boss, D. (1996). The problem of F0 and real life speaker identification: A case study. Forensic
231 Braun, A. (1995). Fundamental frequency. How speaker-specific is it? En A. Braun y J.-P. Kster
(Eds.), Studies in Forensic Phonetics (pp. 9-23). Trier: Wissenschftlicher Verlag.
232 Carrell, T. D. (1985). Contibutions of Fundamental Frequency, Formant Spacing and Glottal
Waveform to Talker Identification. Dissertation Abstracts International, Ann Arbor, 45.
233 Cicres, J. (2005). La variabilidad de la entonacin dentro y entre hablantes y su utilidad en fontica
forense. Comunicacin presentada en el III Congreso de la Sociedad Espaola de Acstica Forense,
Universidad de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela.
234 Cicres, J. (2007). Aplicacin del anlisis de la entonacin y de la alineacin tonal a la identificacin
de hablantes en fontica forense. Tesis doctoral. IULA. Universidad Pompeu Fabra.
235 Dommelen, W. A. van (1997). The contribution of speech rhythm and pitch to speaker recognition.
Language and Speech, 34(4), 325-338.
236 Farrs, M. (2011). La prosdia com a identificador biometric. En A. M. Fernndez Planas (Ed.),
Lingstica forense (pp. 41-46). Nmero monogrfico de la Revista de Sociolingstica de la
Universitat
de
Barcelona.
Barcelona:
Universidad
de
Barcelona.
237 Fitch, J. L. (1990). Consistency of fundamental frequency and perturbation in repeated phonations of
sustained vowels, reading, and connected speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 5, 360363.
238 Gfroerer, S. y Wagner, I. (1995). Fundamental frequency in forensic speech samples. En A. Braun y
J.-P. Kster (Eds.), Studies in Forensic Phonetics (pp. 41-48). Trier: Wissenschftlicher Verlag.
239 Hudson, T., de Jong, G., McDougall, K., Harrison, Ph. y Nolan, F. (2007). F0 statistics for 100 young
male speakers of Standard Southern British English. En Proceedings of the 16th International
Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Sarbrucken, Alemania.
240 Iles, M. W. (1973). Speaker Identification as a Function of Fundamental Frequency and Resonant
Frequencies. Dissertation Abstracts International, Ann Arbor, 34.
241 Jassem, W. (1971). Pitch and compass of the speaking voice. Journal of the International Phonetic
Association, 1, 59-68.
242 Jiang, M. (1996). Fundamental frequency vector for a speaker identification system. Forensic
Linguistics, 3(1), 95- 107.
243 Johnson, K. (1990). The role of perceived speaker identity in F 0 normalization of vowels. Journal of
244 Kinoshita, Y. (2005). Does Lindleys LR estimation formula work for speech data?: Investigation
using long-term F0. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 12, 235-254.
245 Kinoshita, Y., Ishihara, S. y Rose, P. (2008). Exploring the discriminatory potential of F0 distribution
parameters in traditional forensic speaker recognition. International Journal of Speech Language
and the Law, 16(1), 91-111.
246 LaRivire, C. (1975). Contribution of fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to speaker
identification. Phonetica, 31, 185-197.
247 Schiller, N. y Kster, O. (1995). Comparison of four widely used F0-analysis-systems in the forensic
domain. En A. Braun y J.-P. Kster (Eds.), Studies in Forensic Phonetics (pp. 146-158). Trier:
Wissenschftlicher Verlag.
248 Steffen-Batog, M., Jassem, W. y Gruszka-Koscielak, H. (1970). Statistical distribution of short term
F0 values as a personal voice characteristic. En W. Jassem (Ed.). Speech Analysis and Synthesis II
(pp. 195-206). Varsovia: Polish Academy of Sciences.
249 Zraick, R. I., Skaggs, S. D. y Montague, J. C. (2000).The effect of task on determination of habitual
pitch. Journal of Voice, 14(4), 484-489.
11 Sobre el rendimiento judicial del LTAS

250 Gelfer, M. P., Massey, K. P., y Hollien, H. (1989). The effects of sample duration and timing on
speaker identification accuracy by means of long-term spectra. Journal of Phonetics, 17,327-338.
251 Hargraves, W. y Starkweather, J. (1963). Recognition of speaker identity. Language and Speech, 6,
63-67.
252 Hollien, H. y Majewski, W. (1977). Speaker identification by long-term spectra under normal and
distorted speech conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(4), 975-980.
11

Juana Gil. CSIC
253 Keller, E. (2003). Voice Characteristics of MARSEC Speakers. VOQUAL: Voice Quality: Functions,
Analysis and Synthesis (2003).
254 Keller, E. (2005). The analysis of voice quality in speech processing. Lecture Notes in Computer
Science,
Berln:
Springer
Verlag.
Disponible
en
la
direccin:
http://www.springer.de/comp/lncs/index.html.
255 Kitzing, P. (1986). LTAS criteria pertinent to the measurement of voice quality. Journal of Phonetics,
14, 477-82.
256 Klasmeyer, G. (2000). An automatic description tool for time-contours and Long-term Average voice
features in large emotional speech databases. SpeechEmotion-2000, 66-71.
257 Klingholz, F., Penning, R. y Liebhardt, E. (1988). Recognition of low-level alcohol intoxication
from speech signal, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 929-935.
258 Leino, T. (1994). Long-Term Average Spectrum study on speaking voice quality in male actors. En
Friberg, A., Iwarsson, J., Jansson, E. y Sundberg, J. (Eds.), SMAC 93 Proceedings of the Stockholm
Music Acoustics Conference (pp. 206-210). Estocolmo: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
259 Lofqvist, A. (1986). The long-time-average spectrum as a tool in voice research, Journal of
Phonetics, 14, 471-476.
260 Majewski, W. y Hollien, H. (1974). Euclidean distance between long-term speech spectra as a
criterion for speaker identification. Speech Communication Seminar, Estocolmo, 1-3.
261 Molina de Figueiredo, R. (1993). A eficcia de medidas extradas do espectro de longo termo para a
Identificao de Falantes. Cadernos de Estudos Lingsticos, 25, 129-160.
262 Molina de Figueiredo, R. y Bernales, M. (1999). Reconocimiento de hablantes basado en el espectro
a largo tiempo. En Actas del VI Simposio Internacional de Comunicacin Social (pp. 1372-1378).
Santiago de Cuba.
263 Nordenberg, M. y Sundberg, J. (2003). Effect on LTAS of vocal loudness variation. TMH Quarterly
Progress
Status
Report
1/2001.
Disponible
en
la
direccin:
http://www.speech.kth.se/qpsr/tmh/2003/03-45-093-100.pdf.
264 Pittam, J. (1987). The long term spectral measurement of voice quality as a social and personality
marker: A review. Language and Speech, 30,1-12.
265 Zalewski, J., Majewski, W. y Hollien, H. (1975). Cross-correlation between Long-Term Speech
Spectra as a criterion for speaker identification. Acoustics, 34, 20-24.
12 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de los rasgos temporales y de las pausas

266 Braun, A. y Schilz, J. (2009). Speaking tempo in forensic phonetics. Comunicacin presentada en el
Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
267 Butcher, A. (1981). Aspects of the Speech Pause. Kiel: Universitt Kiel.
268 Cicres, J. (2007). Anlisis discriminante de un conjunto de parmetros fontico-acsticos de las
pausas llenas para identificar hablantes. Sntesis Tecnolgica, 3(2), 87-96.
269 Cicres, J. (2011). Acoustic discriminant analysis of full pauses for voice comparison. Comunicacin
presentada en IAFPA 2011. Viena.
270 Clark, H. H. y Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84,
73111.
271 Dellwo, V. y Koreman, J. (2008). How speaker idiosyncratic is acoustically measurable speech
rhythm? Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2008, Lausana.
272 Foulkes, P., Carrol, G. y Hughes, S. (2004). Sociolinguistic and acoustic variability in filled pauses.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2004. Helsinki.
273 Gelfer, M. P., Massey, K. P. y Hollien, H. (1989). The effects of sample duration and timing on
speaker identification. Accuracy by means of long-term spectra. Journal of Phonetics, 17(4). 327338.
274 Grabe, E. y Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. En
C. Gussenhoven y N. Warner (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 515-43). Berln,
NuevaYork: Mouton de Gruyter.
275 Jessen, M. (2007). Forensic reference data on articulation rate in German. Science and Justice, 47,
50-67.
276 Johnson, C., Hollien, H., y Hicks Jr., J. (1984). Speaker identification utilizing selected temporal
speech features. Journal of Phonetics, 12(4), 319-326.
277 Kim, K. (2004). A forensic phonetic investigation into the duration and speech rate.
En INTERSPEECH-2004, 2353-2356.
12

Juana Gil. CSIC
278 Koreman, J. (2006). Perceived speech rate: The effects of articulation rate and speaking style in
spontaneous speech, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 582-596.
279 Knzel, H. J. (1997). Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic
280 Knzel, H. J., Masthof, H. R. y Kster, J.-P. (1995). The relation between speech tempo, loudness,
and fundamental frequency: An important issue in forensic speaker recognition. Science and Justice,
35, 291-295.
281 Miller, J. L., Grosjean, F. y Lomanto, C. (1984). Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous
speech: A reanalysis and some implications, Phonetica, 41, 215225.
282 Molina de Figueiredo, R. (1993). Variabilidade inter e intra-Falante da freqncia fundamental em
funo da velocidade de emisso. Estudos Lingsticos, XXIII, 697-704.
283 Molina de Figueiredo, R. (1994). The effects of speaking rate on inter- and intra-speaker variability
of selected speech parameters. The Phonetician, CL-67, 13.
284 Molina de Figueiredo, R. (1996). The effects of fast speech rate on some selected speech parameters.
Comunicacin presentada en el 14th Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences.
Tokio.
285 Mori, L. y Paoloni, A. (2004). Sulla sociolinguistica forense: La constituzione di corpora vocali per
lanalisi della velocit di articulazione in italiano. En Atti delle XIV Giornate del GFS, Viterbo.
286 Ramus, F., Nespor, M. y Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.
Cognition, 73, 265-292.
287 Romito, L., Lio, L. y Galat, V. (2005). Fluency articulation and speech rate as new parameters in
the speaker recognition. Comunicacin presentada en el III Congreso Internacional de Fontica
Experimental. Santiago de Compostela.
288 Shriberg, E. (2001). To errrr is human: Ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of
the International Phonetic Association, 31, 153-169.
289 Tsao, Y. C. y Weismer, G. (1997). Interspeaker variation in habitual speaking rate: Evidence for a
neuromuscular component. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 858866.
290 Tschpe, N., Trouvain, J., Bauer, D. y Jessen, M. Idyosincratic patterns of filled pauses.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2005, Marraquech.
13 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la cualidad de la voz

291 Beck, J. M. (2004). Perceptual analysis of voice quality: The place of voice profile analysis. En W.
Hardcastle, y J. M. Beck, (Eds.), A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver (pp. 285-322),
Nueva York: Routledge.
292 Czajkowski, A. y Dellwo, W. (2009). The effect of whispered speech on speaker discrimination by
nave and expert listeners. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
293 Dellwo, V., Huckvale, M. y Ashby, M. (2007). How is individuality expressed in voice? An
introduction to speech production and description for speaker classification. En C. Mller
(Ed.), Speaker Classification I. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Series (pp. 1-20). Berln:
Springer Verlag.
294 Evans, I. y Foulkes, P. (2009). Speaker identification in whisper. Comunicacin presentada en el
Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
295 Hollien, H. y Michel, J. F. (1968). Vocal fry as a phonational register. Journal of Speech and
Hearing Research, 11, 600-604.
296 Hollien, H. y Wendahl, K. W. (1968). Perceptual study of vocal fry. Journal of the Acoustical Society
o America, 43, 506-9.
297 Hurme, P. y Sonninen, A. (1985). Normal and disordered voice quality: Listening tests and longterm spectrum analyses. Puheentutkimuksen Alalta, 6, 49-72.
298 Hurme, P. y Sonninen, A. (1992). On the terminology of voice research. Journal of Voice, 6(2), 188193.
299 Jessen, M. (1997). Speaker-specific information in voice quality parameters. Forensic Linguistics,
4(1), 84103.
300 Kster, O. y Kster, J.-P. (2004). The auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice quality in forensic
speaker recognition. The Phonetician, 89, 9-37.
301 Kster, O., Jessen, M., Khairi, F. y Eckert, H. (2007). Auditory-perceptual identification of voice
quality by expert and non-expert listeners. Comunicacin presentada en el XVI International
Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Saarbrcken.
13

Juana Gil. CSIC
302 Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
303 Laver, J. (1991). The Gift of Speech. Papers in the Analysis of Speech and Voice. Edimburgo:
Edinburgh University Press.
304 Nolan, F. (2005). Forensic speaker identification and the phonetic description of voice quality. En W.
J. Hardcastle y J. Mackenzie Beck (Eds.), A Figure of Speech (pp. 385-411). Londres: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
305 Nolan, F. (2007). Voice quality and forensic speaker identification. GOVOR: Casopis Za Fonetiku,
24(2), 111-128.
306 Nolan, F., French, P., McDougall, K., Stevens, L. y Hudson, T. (2011). The role of voice quality
settings in perceived voice similarity. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2011.
Viena.
307 Wagner, I. (1995). A new jitter-algorithm to quantify hoarseness: An exploratory study. Forensic
308 Wenndt, S. J., Cupples, E. J. y Floyd, R. M. (2002): A study on the classification of whispered and
normally phonated speech. Comunicacin presentada en la International Conference on Spoken
Language Processing. Denver,
309 Yarmey, D. (2004). Commonsense beliefs, recognition and the identification of familiar and
unfamiliar speakers from verbal and non-linguistic vocalization. International Journal of Speech,
Language and the Law, 11(2), 267-277.
14 Sobre la admisibilidad y la tica de los peritajes y sobre la formulacin de las conclusiones

310 Aitken, C. G. C. (2000). Statistical interpretation of evidence Bayesian analysis. En J. A. Siegel, G.
K. Knupfer y P. J. Saukko (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences (pp. 717-724). Nueva York:
Academic Press.
311 Aitken, C. G. G. y Taroni, F. (1998). A verbal scale for the interpretation of evidence. Science and
Justice, 38(4), 279-281.
312 Aitken, C. G. G. y Taroni, F. (2004). Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists.
Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
313 Bimbot, F., Chollet, G. y Paoloni, A. (1994). Assessment methodology for speaker identification and
verification systems. Comunicacin presentada en el ESCA Workshop on Automatic Speaker
Recognition, Identification and Verification. Martigny.
314 Black, B., Ayala, F. J. y Saffran-Brinks, C. (1994). Science and the law in the wake of Daubert: A
new search for scientific knowledge. Texas Law Review, 72(4), 715-802.
315 Bo, L.-J. (1998). Lidentification juridique de la voix: Le cas franais. Historique, problmatique et
propositions. Comunicacin presentada en el RLA2C Workshop on Speaker Recognition and its
Commercial and Forensic Applications. Avignon.
316 Bonastre, J.-F., Bimbot, F., Bo, L.-J., Campbell, J. P., Reynolds, D. A. y Magrin-Chagnolleau, I.
(2003). Person authentication by voice: A need for caution. Comunicacin presentada en
EUROSPEECH 2003. Ginebra.
317 Butters, R. R. (2009). The forensic linguists professional credentials. International Journal of
Speech, Language and the Law, 16(2), 237-252.
318 Champod, C. y Meuwly, D. (2000). The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition. Speech
319 Daubert. (1993). Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786.
320 Eriksson, A. y Lacerda, F. (2007). Charlatanry in forensic speech science: A problem to be taken
seriously. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 14, 16993.
321 Eriksson, A. (2011). Presenting evidence in court: Some fundamental problems to be considered.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2011. Viena.
322 Evett, I. W. (1991). Interpretation: A personal odyssey. En C. G. G. Aitken y D. A. Stoney (Eds.),
The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science (pp. 9-22). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
323 Evett, I. W. (1998). Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science
casework. Science and Justice, 38(3), 198-202.
324 Finegan, E. (2009). Expert linguists and the whole truth. International Journal of Speech, Language
and the Law, 16(2), 267-277.
325 French, J. P. y Harrison, P. (2006). Investigative and evidential applications of forensic speech
science. En A. Heaton-Armstrong, E. Shepherd, G Gudjonsson y D. Wolchover (Eds.), Witness
14

Juana Gil. CSIC
Testimony: Psychological, Investigative and Evidential Perspectives (cap. 14). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
326 French, J. P. y Harrison, P. (2007). Position statement concerning use of impressionistic likelihood
terms in forensic speaker comparison cases. International Journal of Speech, Language and the
Law, 14(1), 137-144.
327 French, J. P., Nolan, F., Foulkes, P., Harrison, Ph. y McDougall, K. (2010). The UK position
statement on forensic speaker comparison: A rejoinder to Rose and Morrison. International Journal
of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(1), 143-152.
328 Frye. (1923). Frye vs. United States. 293 Federal Reports (1 serie), 1013, 1014.
329 Gonzlez, J., Drygajlo, A., Ramos, D., Garca, M. y Ortega, J. (2006). Robust estimation,
interpretation and assessment of likelihood ratios in forensic speaker recognition. Computer Speech
and Language Special Issue, 20(2-3), 331-355.
330 Good, I. J. (1991) Weight of evidence and the Bayesian Likelihood Ratio. En C. G. G. Aitken y D.
A. Stoney (Eds.), The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science (pp. 85-106). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
331 Hodgson, D. (2002). A lawyer looks at Bayes Theorem. The Australian Law Journal, 76, 109-118.
332 Hollien, H. (1990). The phonetician as an expert witness: Ethics and responsabilities. En R. Rieber y
W. Stewart (Eds.), The Language Scientist as an Expert in the Legal Setting (pp. 33-45). Nueva
York: New York Academy of Sciences.
333 Ishihara, S. y Kinoshita, Y. (2008). How many do we need? Exploration of the population size effect
on the performance of forensic speaker classification. En INTERSPEECH-2008. ISCA: Brisbane,
1941-1944.
334 Law Commission (2011). Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales. Law
Com. 325. Londres: The Stationary Office.
335 Levi, J. N. (1994). Language as evidence: The linguist as expert witness in North American courts.
336 Morrison, G. S. (2010a). Forensic voice comparison. En I. Freckelton y H. Selby (Eds.), Expert
Evidence (Captulo 99). Sydney: Thomson Reuters.
337 Morrison, G. S., Thiruvaran, T., y Epps, J. (2010b). Estimating the precision of the likelihood-ratio
output of a forensic-voice-comparison system. Proceedings of Odyssey 2010: The Language and
Speaker Recognition Workshop, Brno, pp. 6370.
338 Morrison, G. S. (2011a). La comparacin forense de la voz y el cambio de paradigma. Cuadernos de
Trabajo del Posgrado Oficial en Estudios Fnicos, 1, 1-38.
339 Morrison, G. S. (2011b). A comparison of procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios
from acoustic-phonetic data: Multvariate kernel density (MVKD) versus Gaussian mixture model
universal background model (GMM-UBM). Speech Communication, 53, 242256.
340 Nolan, F. (2001). Speaker identification evidence: Its forms, limitations, and roles. En T. SalmiTolonen, R. Foley e I. Tukiainen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference "Law and Language:
Prospect and Retrospect" (pp. 12-15). Levi: Rovaniemi.
341 Olsson, J. (2004). Forensic Linguistics. An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law (Captulo
3). Londres: Continuum.
342 Robertson, B. y Vignaux, G. A. (1995). Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the
Courtroom. Chichester: Wiley.
343 Rodman, R. (2002). Linguistics and the law: How knowledge of, or ignorance of, elementary
linguistics may affect the dispensing of justice. Forensic Linguistics, 9(1), 92-101.
344 Rose, Ph. (2005). Forensic Speaker Recognition at the beginning of the Twenty-First century. An
overview and a demonstration. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 37(2), 49-71.
345 Rose, Ph. y Morrison, G. S. (2009). A response to the UK Position Statement on forensic speaker
comparison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 16, 139-163.
346 Shuy, R. (2009). Ethical questions in forensic linguistics. International Journal of Speech, Language
and the Law, 16(2), 219-226.
347 Stygall, G. (2009). Guiding principles: Forensic linguistics and codes of ethics in other fields and
professions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 16(2), 253-266.
348 Thompson, C. y Schumann, E. L. (1987). Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The
prosecutors fallacy and the defense attorneys fallacy. Law and Human Behaviour, 11(3), 167-187.
15

Juana Gil. CSIC
15 Sobre la prueba pericial de voz en la legislacin espaola

349 Banacloche Palao, J. (1998). Reconocimiento de voces como prueba vlida para enervar la
presuncin de inocencia. Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal Supremo de 3 de noviembre de
1997. Revista Tribunales de Justicia, 7, 806-810.
350 B.O.E. (2010). Real Decreto de 14 de septiembre de 1882, por el que se aprueba la Ley de
Enjuiciamiento Criminal. Madrid: BOE.
351 De Diego Dez, L. A. (2003). La voz como elemento identificador del delincuente. Revista del Poder
Judicial, 69, 399-419.
352 Fungairio, E. (2002). Notas sobre la prueba de audio en el proceso penal. Acstica Forense. Revista
Oficial de la Sociedad Espaola de Acstica Forense, 1, 21-32.
353 Lucena Molina, J. J. (2002). Marco legal espaol en la prueba pericial de voz. Acstica Forense.
Revista Oficial de la Sociedad Espaola de Acstica Forense, 1, 46-60.
354 Martnez Snchez, C. (1999). Intervencin en la Mesa Redonda sobre El valor de la prueba
pericial en el II Simposio sobre Reconocimiento de Voz con Fines Forenses, Cartagena [CD Servicio
de Informtica de la Universidad Politcnica de Cartagena].
355 Morales, A. M. y Welsch, G. (2011). El reconocimiento de imputados en Chile y a nivel comparado.
Santiago de Chile: Ed. Paz Ciudadana.
356 Prez Gonzlez, L. (2005). Perspectivas del desarrollo del peritaje lingstico en Espaa. En M. T.
Turell, (Ed.), Lingstica forense, lengua y derecho (pp. 67-84). Barcelona: Edicions Institut
Universitari de Lingustica Aplicada.
16 Sobre la identificacin de voces disimuladas (transformacin)

357 Clark, J. y Foulkes, P. (2007). Identification of voices in electronically disguised speech.
358 Dellwo, V., Ramyead, S. y Dankovicova, J. (2009). The influence of voice disguise on temporal
characteristics of speech. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
359 Docherty, E. T. y Hollien, H. (1978). Multiple factor speaker identification of normal and
distorted speech. Journal of Phonetics, 6, 1-8.
360 Endres, W., Bambach, W., y Flosser, G. (1971). Voice spectrograms as a function of age, voice
disguise and voice imitation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 18421848.
361 Eriksonn, E., Green, J., Sjstrm, M., Sullivan, K. P. H. y Zetterholm, E. (2004). Perceived age: A
distractor for voice disguise and speaker identification? Comunicacin presentada en Fonetik 2004.
Estocolmo.
362 Eriksson, A. (2010). The disguised voice: Imitating accents or speech styles and impersonating
individuals. En C. Llamas y D. Watt (Eds.), Language and Identities (pp.86-96). Edimburgo:
Edinburgh University Press.
363 Hirson, A. y Duckworth, M. (1993). Glottal fry and voice disguise: A case study in forensic
phonetics. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 15, 193-208.
364 Hollien, H. y Majewski, W. (1977). Speaker identification by long-term spectra under normal and
distorted speech conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(4), 975-980.
365 Hollien, H., Majewski, W., y Hollien, P. A. (1974). Speaker identification by long-term spectra under
normal, stress and disguised conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55(1),
820.
366 Hollien, H., Majewski, W., y Doherty, E. T. (1982). Perceptual identification of voices under normal,
stress and disguise speaking conditions. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 139-148.
367 Knzel, H. J. (2000). Effects of voice disguise on speaking fundamental frequency. Forensic
368 Knzel, H. J., Gonzlez, J. y Ortega, J. (2004). Effect of voice disguise on the performance of a
forensic automatic speaker recognition system. Comunicacion presentada en Odissey 2004. The
Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop. Toledo.
369 Markham, D. (1999). Listeners and disguised voices: The imitation and perception of dialectal
accent. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 6(2), 289-299.
370 Masthoff, H. R. (1996). A report on a voice disguise experiment. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 160167.
371 McGlone, R., Hollien, H. y Hollien, P. (1977). Acoustic analysis of voice disguise related to voice
identification. En Proceedings of the International Conference on Crime Countermeasures (pp. 3135). Kentucky: University of Kentucky.
16

Juana Gil. CSIC
372 Molina de Figueiredo, R. y de Souza Britto, H. (1996). A report on the acoustic effects of one type of
disguise. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 168-175.
373 Molina de Figueiredo, R. (2000). Algumas consideraes sobre o disfarce de voz. Estudos
Lingsticos, XXIX, 543-548.
374 Moosmller, S. (2001). The influence of creaky voice on formant frequency changes. International
Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 8(1), 10-112.
375 Moosmller, S. (2006). Articulatory avoidance. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la
IAFPA 2006. Gotemburgo.
376 Neuhauser, S. y Simpson, A. P. (2007). Imitated or authentic? Listeners' judgements of foreign
accents. Comunicacin presentada en el XVI International Congress of Phonetic Sciences,
Saarbrcken.
377 Neuhauser, S. (2009). VOT as a parameter in identification of voice disguise. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
378 Neuhauser, S. y Simpson, A. P. (2007). Phonetic correlates of accent authenticity in voice disguise.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2007. Plymouth.
379 Ochard, T. y Yarmey, A. (1995). The effects of whispers, voice sample duration and voice
distinctiveness on criminal speaker identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 249-260.
380 Perrot, P. y Chollet, G. (2012). Helping the Forensic Research Institute of the French Gendarmerie to
identify a suspect in the presence of voice disguise or voice forgery. En A. Neustein y H. A. Patil
(Eds.). Forensic Speaker Recognition. Law Enforcement and Counter-Terrorism (pp.469-503).
Nueva York: Springer.
381 Perrot, P., Aversano, G. y Chollet, G. (2007). Voice disguise and automatic detection: Review and
perspectives. En Y. Stylianou, M. Faundez y A. Esposito (Eds.), Progress in Non-Linear Speech
Processing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 101-117). Berln: Springer Verlag.
382 Perrot, P., Preteux, C., Vasseur, S., y Chollet, G. (2007). Detection and recognition of voice disguise.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAPFA 2007. Plymouth.
383 Reich, A. (1975). Certain effect of selected vocal disguises upon spectrographic speaker
identification. Tesis Doctoral. University of Iowa.
384 Reich, A. (1981). Detecting the presence of vocal disguise in the male voice. Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 69(5), 1458-60.
385 Reich, A. y Duke, J. (1979). Effects of selected vocal disguises upon speaker identification by
listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 10231028.
386 Reich, A., Moll, K. y Curtis, J. (1976). Effects of selected vocal disguises upon spectrographic
speaker identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 919 925.
387 Rhodes, R. y Setter, J. (2009). Using the formant dynamic approach to forensic speaker comparison
in a case of voice disguise. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
388 Rodman, R. (1998). Speaker recognition of disguised voices. En M. Demirekler, A. Saranli, H.
Altincay y A. Paoloni (Eds.) Proceedings of the Consortium on Speech Technology Conference on
Speaker Recognition by Man and Machine: Directions for Forensic Applications (pp. 922). Ankara: COST 250 Publishing Arm,
389 Rodman, R. (2003). Speaker Recognition of Disguised Voices: A Program for Research. Raleigh,
Carolina del Norte: North Carolina State University.
390 Rodman, R. y Powell, M. (2000). Computer recognition of speakers who disguise their voice. En
Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing Applications and Technology
(ICSPAT2000). Dallas.
391 Rose, Ph. y Simmons, A. (1996). F-pattern variability in disguise and over the telephone.
Comparisons for forensic speaker identification. En Proceedings of the 6th Australian International
Conference on Speech Science and Technology -SST'96 (pp.127-132). Adelaida: ASSTA.
392 Sample, J. (1984). Methods of Disguise. Port Townsend: Loompanics Unlimited.
393 Shinan, L. y Almeida, A. (1986). The effects of voice disguise upon formant transitions.
Comunicacin presentada en la 1986 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal
Processing (pp. 885-88).
394 Simpson, A. P. (2007). Phonetic details of nonpulmonic stop release in German: inter- and
intraindividual variation. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2007. Plymouth.
395 Simpson, A. P. y Neuhauser, S. (2009). Enduring nature of epiphenomenal non-pulmonic sound
production under disguise a preliminary study. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la
IAFPA 2009. Cambridge.
396 Simpson, A. P. y Neuhauser, S. (2010). The persistence of ephiphenomenal sound production in
foreign accent disguise. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2010. Trier.
17

Juana Gil. CSIC
397 Storey, K. C. J. (1996). Constants in auditory and acoustic voice analysis in forensic speaker
identification in cases of disguised voice. En H. Kniffka y S. Blackwell (Eds.). Recent Developments
in Forensic Linguistics (pp. 203-216). Frankfurt: Lang.
398 Zhang, C. (2005). Acoustical Study on Disguised Voices. Tesis Doctoral. Nankai University.
399 Zhang, C., y Tan, T. (2008). Voice disguise and automatic speaker recognition. Forensic Science
International, 175, 118-122.
17 Sobre la identificacin de voces disimuladas (conversin)

400 Bessler, P. (1991). La caricature de de Gaulle par Tissot: tude phonostylistique.
Information/Communication, 12, 1932.
401 Blomberg, M., Elenius, D. y Zetterholm, E. (2004). Relating acoustic features of a professional
impersonator with the score of a speaker verification system. Proceedings of Fonetik 2004.
Universidad de Estocolmo, Estocolmo.
402 Cerd, R. (2009). Camps de dispersi voclica en imitacions de veu: Primers indicis d'un experiment
sobre identificaci de locutor. Estudios de Fontica Experimental, 18, 65-88.
403 Eriksson, A. (1997) How flexible is the human voice? A case study of mimicry. En Proceedings of
EUROSPEECH 97 (pp. 1043-1046). Vol. II. Rodas.
404 Schlichting, F. y Sullivan, K. P H. (1998). Can voice imitation be detected in voice line-ups in a
language unknown by the listeners? Phonum. Reports in Phonetics, 6, 105-18.
405 Sullivan, K., Zetterholm, E., Van Doorn, J., Green, J., Kgler, F. y Eriksson, E. (2002). The effect of
removing semantic information upon the impact of voice imitation. Comunicacin presentada en la
9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Melbourne.
406 Zetterholm, E. (1997). A phonetic case study of impersonation. Phonum. Reports in Phonetics, 4, 3336.
407 Zetterholm, E. (1997). Impersonation: a phonetic case study of the imitation of a voice. Lund
University, Department of Linguistics Working Papers, 46, 269-287.
408 Zetterholm, E. (2001). Impersonation - reproduction of speech. Lund University, Department of
LinguisticsWorking Papers, 49, 176-179.
409 Zetterholm, E. (2002a). A comparative survey of phonetic features of two impersonators.
En Proceedings of Fonetik 2002. TMH-Quarterly Progress Status Report, 44, 129-132.
410 Zetterholm, E. (2002b). Intonation pattern and duration differences in imitated speech.
Comunicacin presentada en Speech Prosody 2000. An International Conference. Aix-en-Provence.
411 Zetterholm, E. (2003a).Voice Imitation. A Phonetic Study of Perceptual Illusions and Acoustic
Success. Tesis Doctoral. Travaux de linstitut de Linguistique de Lund 44, Lund University.
412 Zetterholm, E. (2003b). The same but different. Three impersonators imitate the same target voices.
Comunicacin presentada en el 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona.
413 Zetterholm, E. (2005). Voice Imitation. A phonetic study of perceptual illusions and acoustic success.
International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 12, 133-135.
414 Zetterholm, E. (2010). Detection of imitated voices: Who are reliable earwitnesses? International
Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17, 25-44.
18 Sobre el efecto del telfono en la comparacin de voces

415 Arcienega, M. y Drygajlo, A. (2002). Robust voiced-unvoiced decision associated to continuous
pitch tracking in noisy telephone speech. En ICSLP, 2433-2436.
416 Besacier, L. Grassi, S., Dufaux, A., Ansorge, M. y Pellandini, F. (2000). GSM speech coding and
speaker recognition. Comunicacin presentada en la International Conference on Acoustics, Speech
and Signal Processing. Estambul.
417 Byrne, C. y Foulkes, P. (2004). The mobile phone effect on vowel formants. International Journal of
Speech, Language and the Law, 11, 83-102.
418 Cerrato, L., Falcone, M. y Paoloni, A. (2000). Subjective age estimation of telephonic voices. Speech
419 Chen, N. F., Shen, W., Campbell, J. y Schwartz, R. (2009). Large scale analysis or formant
frequency estimation variability in conversational telephone speech. Comunicacin presentada en
INTERSPEECH-2009, Brighton.
18

Juana Gil. CSIC
420 Foulkes, P. y Barron, A. (2000). Telephone speaker recognition amongst members of close social
network. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 7, 180-198.
421 Gazit, R. Metzger, Y. y Toledo, O. (2001). Speaker verification over cellular networks.
Comunicacin presentada en 2001: A Speaker Odyssey, Creta.
422 Guillemin, B. J. y Watson, C. I. (2005). Impact of the GSM AMR speech codec on formant
information important to forensic speaker identification. En P. Warren y C. I. Watson (Eds.), 11th
Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology (pp. 483-488). Aukland:
University of Auckland.
423 Guillemin, B. y Watson, C. I. (2008). Impact of the mobile phone network on the speech signal Some preliminary findings. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 15(2). 193-218.
424 Guillemin, B., Watson, C. I. y Dowler, S. W. (2005). Impact of the GSM-AMR speech codec on
acoustic parameters used in forensic speaker identification. Comunicacin presentada en el 8th
International Symposium on DSP and Communication Systems, DSPCS'2005. Noosa Heads,
Australia.
425 Harrison, P. (2001). GSM interference cancellation for forensic audio: A report on work in progress.
Forensic Linguistics, 8(2), 923.
426 Hennebert, J., Melin, H., Petrovska, D. y Genoud, D. (2000). Polycost: A telephone-speech database
for speaker recognition. Speech Communication, 31, 265-270.
427 Hirson, A., French, J. P. and Howard, D. (1995). Speech fundamental frequency over the telephone
and face-to-face: Some implications for forensic phonetics. En J. Windsor Lewis (Ed.), Studies in
General and English Phonetics in Honour of Professor J. D. OConnor (pp. 23040). Londres:
Routledge.
428 Hirson, A. y Howard, D. M. (1994). Spectrographic analysis of a cockpit voice recorder tape.
Forensic Linguistics, 1(1), 5969.
429 Hudson, T. McDougall, K. y Nolan, F. (2008). Effects of the telephone on perceived voice similarity.
Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA 2008. Lausana.
430 Jimnez, J. J. (2011). Estructura formntica y campo de dispersin de las vocales del espaol en
telefona mvil. Cuadernos de Trabajo del Posgrado en Estudios Fnicos, 1, 39-58.
431 Kuitert, M. y Boves, L. (1997). Speaker verification with GSM coded telephone speech. En
Proceedings of Eurospeech97 (pp. 975-978). Rodas.
432 Knzel, H. J. (2001). Beware of the telephone effect: The influence of telephone transmission on
the measurement of formant frequencies. Forensic Linguistics, 8(1), 80-99.
433 Knzel, H. J. (2002). Rejoinder to Francis Nolans The Telephone Effect on Formants: A
Response. Forensic Linguistics, 9(1). 83-86.
434 Livijn, P. (2004). A comparison between four common ways of recording and storing speech:
Implications for forensic phonetics. En Proceedings o Fonetik04 (pp. 104-107). Estocolmo:
Stockholm University.
435 McDougall, K., Hudson, T. yNolan, F. (2009). Voice identification accuracy following telephone and
full-bandwidth exposure to a voice. Comunicacin presentada en el Congreso de IAFPA 2009.
Cambridge.
436 Moye, L. S. (1979). Study of the Effects on Speech Analysis of the Types of Degradation Occurring
in Telephony. Standard Telecommunication Laboratories, Harlow.
437 Nolan, F. (2002). The telephone effect on formants: A response. Forensic Linguistics, 9(1), 74-82.
438 Reynolds, D. A. (1995). The effect of telephone transmission degradations on speaker recognition
performance. Comunicacin presentada en la International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and
Signal Processing. Detroit.
439 Ruiz, C. y Hernando Sacristn, E. (2005). Valoracin de apuestas a priori en reconocimientos
forenses de voz en escuchas telefnicas. Comunicacin presentada en el III Congreso de la Sociedad
Espaola de Acstica Forense. Santiago de Compostela.
440 Sanders, E., Van den Heuvel, H. y Choukri, K. (1999). Building speech databases for cellular
networks. Comunicacin presentada en la Sixth European Conference on Speech Communication and
Technology (Eurospeech99). Budapest.
441 Trawiska, A. y Kajstura, M. (2004). The inbuilt recorder of mobile phones possibilities of
forensic speaker identification. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 57, 5180.
442 Yarmey, A. D. (2003). Earwitness identification over the telephone and in field settings.
443 Yoon, T. J., Cole, J., Hasegawa-Johnson, M. y Shih, C. (2005). Acoustic correlates of non-modal
phonation in telephone speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(4), 2621.
19

Juana Gil. CSIC
19 Sobre los efectos del trascurso del tiempo: muestras de habla no contempornea
444 Hollien, H., Green, R. y Massey, K. (1994). Longitudinal research on adolescent voice change in
males. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 96(5), 26462654.
445 Hollien, H. y Schwartz, R. (2000). Aural-perceptual speaker identification: problems with
noncontemporary samples. Forensic Linguistics, 7(2), 199211.
446 Hollien, H. y Schwartz, R. (2001). Speaker identification utilizing noncontemporary speech. Journal
of Forensic Sciences, 46, 6367.
447 Knzel, H. (2007). Non-contemporary speech samples: auditory detectability of an 11 year delay and
its effect on automatic speaker identification. International Journal of Speech, Language and the
Law, 14(1), 109136.
448 Rose, Ph. (1998). A forensic phonetic investigation in non-contemporaneous variation in the Fpattern of similar-sounding speakers. En R. H. Mannell y J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.), Proceedings of the
5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 217-220). Camberra: ASSTA.
449 Rose, Ph. (1999). Long- and short-term within-speaker differences in the formants of Australian
hello. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 29(1), 131.
20 Sobre los efectos en el habla de la intoxicacin etlica

450 Behne, S. M. y Rivera, S. M. (1990). Effects of alcohol on speech: Acoustic analysis of Spondees.
Research on Speech Perception. Progress Report No. 16 (pp. 263-292). Bloomington: Speech
Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
451 Behne, S. M., Rivera, S. M. y Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Effects of alcohol on speech: Duration of isolated
words, sentence, and passages. Progress Report No. 17 (pp. 285-302). Bloomington: Speech
Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
452 Braun, A. (1991). Speaking while intoxicated: Phonetic and forensic aspects. En Actes du XIIme
Congrs International des Sciences Phontiques (pp. 146-149). Aix-en-Provence: Universit de
Provence.
453 Brenner, M. y Cash, J. R. (1991). Speech analysis as an index of alcohol intoxication. The Exxon
Valdez accident. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 62(9), 893-898.
454 Chin, S. B. y Pisoni, D. B. (1997). Alcohol and Speech. San Diego: Academic Press.
455 Chin, S. B., Large, N. R. y Pisoni, D. B. (1996-1997). Effects of alcohol on the production of words
in context: A first report. Research on Spoken Language Processing, Progress Report No. 21 (pp.
403-420). Bloomington: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
456 Cooney, O. M., McGuigan, K. G., Murphy, P. J. P. y Conroy, R. M. (1988). Acoustic analysis of the
effects of alcohol on the human voice. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(5), 2895.
457 Cummings, K. E., Chin, S. B. y Pisoni, D. B. (1995). Acoustic and glottal excitation analyses of
sober vs. intoxicated speech. Research on Spoken Language Processing, Progress Report No. 20
(pp. 359-386). Bloomington: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
458 Cummings, K. E., Chin, S. B. y Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Analysis of the glottal excitation analyses of
intoxicated vs. sober speech. A first report. Comunicacin presentada en el 131 Congress of the
Acoustical Society of America. Indianpolis. Indiana.
459 DeJong, G., Hollien, H., Martin, C. y Alderman, C. A. (1995). Speaking rate and alcohol intoxication.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97. 3364.
460 Dodge, R. y Benedict, F. G. (1915). Psychological Effects of Alcohol. An Experimental Investigation
of Moderate Doses of Ethyl Alcohol on a Related Group of Neuro-muscular Processes in Man.
Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
461 Dunker, E. y Schlosshauer, B. (1964). Irregularities of the laryngeal vibratory pattern in healthy and
oarse persons. En D. W. Brewer (Ed.), Research Potentials in Voice Physiology (pp. 151-184).
Syracuse: State University of New York.
462 Fontan, M., Bouanna, J., Piquet, M. y Wgeux, F. (1978). Les troubles articulatoires chez lthylique.
Lille Mdicale, 23, 529-542.
463 Forney, R. B. y Hughes, F. W. (1961). Delayed auditory feedback and ethanol: Effect on verbal and
arithmetic performace. Journal of Psychology, 52, 185-192.
464 Hollien, H. (1993). An oilspill, alcohol and the captain. Forensic Science International, 60, 97-105.
465 Hollien, H., DeJong, G. y Martin, C. A. (1998a). Production of intoxication states by actors:
Perception by lay listeners. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 6, 1153-1162.
20

Juana Gil. CSIC
466 Hollien, H., DeJong, G. y Martin, C. A. (1998b). Suprasegmental speech shifts as a function of
intoxication level. Comunicacin presentada en el International Phonetic Sciences Conference,
Bellingham, WA.
467 Hollien, H., DeJong, G., Martin, C. A., Schwartz, R. y Liljegren, K. (2001). Effects of ethanol
intoxication on speech suprasegmentals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(6), 31893206.
468 Hollien, H., Harnsberger, J. D., Martin, C., Hill, R. y Alderman, G. A. (2009). Perceiving the effects
of ethanol intoxication on voice. Journal of Voice, 23(5), 552-559.
469 Hollien, H., Liljegren, K., Martin, C. A. y DeJong, G. (1999). Prediction of intoxication levels by
speech analysis. En A. Braun (Ed.), Advances in Phonetics (pp. 40-50). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner
Verlag.
470 Hollien, H., Liljegren, K., Martin, C. A. y DeJong, G. (2001). Production of intoxication status by
actors: Acoustic and temporal characteristics. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(1), 68-73.
471 Hollien, H. y Martin, C. A. (1996). Conducting research on the effects of intoxication on speech.
Forensic Linguistics, 3, 107-128.
472 Hnig, F., Batliner, A. y Nth, E. (2011). Does it groove or does it stumble. Automatic classification
of alcoholic intoxication using prosodic features. En Proceedings of INTERSPEECH-2011. Florencia.
http://www5.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Forschung/Publikationen/2011/Hoenig11-DIG.pdf
473 Johnson, K., Pisoni, D. B. y Bernacki, R. H. (1990). Do voice recordings reveal whether a person is
intoxicated? A case study. Phonetica, 47(3/4), 215-237.
474 Johnson, K., Southwood, M. H., Schmidt, A. M., Mouli, C. M., Holmes, A. T., Armstrong, A. A.,
Critz-Crosby, P., Sutphin, S. M., Crosby, R., McCutcheon, M. J. y Wilson, A. S. (1993). A
physiological study of the effects of alcohol on speech and voice. Comunicacin presentada en el
22th Annual Symposium on the Care of the Professional Voice. Voice Foundation, Filadelfia.
475 Klingholz, F., Penning, R. y Liebhart, E. (1988). Recognition of low-level of alcohol intoxication
from speech signal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(3), 929-935.
476 Knzel, H. (1990). Inuence of alcohol on speech and language. Comunicacin presentada en la
American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Cincinnati, Ohio.
477 Knzel, H., Braun, A. y Eysholdt, U. (1992). Einflu von Alcohol auf Sprache und Stimme.
Heidelberg: Kriminalistik Verlag.
478 Knzel, H. y Braun, A. (2003). The effect of alcohol on speech prosody. En Proceedings of the XVI
International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 2645-2648.
479 Lester, L. y Scousen, R. (1974). The phonology of drunkenness. En A. Bruck, R. Fox y M. W.
LaGaly (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology (pp. 233-239). Chicago: Chicago
Linguistic Society.
480 Levit, M., Huber, R., Batliner, A. y Noeth, E. (2001). Use of prosodic speech characteristics for
automated detection of alcohol intoxication. En M. Bacchiani, J. Hirchsberg, D. Litman y M.
Ostendorf (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Prosody in Speech
Recognition and Understanding (pp. 22-25), Red Bank, NJ: International Speech and
Communication Association.
481 Lewis, A. y Watt, D. (2009). The effects of alcohol intoxication on vowel articulation. Comunicacin
presentada en el Congreso de la IAFPA-2009. Cambridge.
482 Martin, C. S. y Yuchtman, M. (1986). Using speech as an index of alcohol intoxication. Research on
Speech Perception. Progress Report No. 12 (pp. 413-426). Bloomington: Speech Research
Laboratory, Indiana University.
483 Menik, R. (1999). Recognition of alcohol influence on speech. En Proceedings of Workshop on Text,
Speech and Dialogue, Plzen, 384-387.
484 Pisoni, D. B., Hathaway, S. M. y Yuchtman, M. (1985). Effects of alcohol on the acoustic-phonetic
properties of speech. Research on Speech Perception. Progress Report No. 11 (pp. 109-172).
Bloomington: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
485 Pisoni, D. B. y Martin, C. (1989). Effects of alcohol on the acoustic-phonetic properties of speech:
Perceptual and acoustic analyses. Alcoholism: Clinical Experimental Research, 13(4), 577-587.
486 Pisoni, D. B., Yuchtman, M. y Hathaway, S. M. (1986). Effects of alcohol on the acoustic-phonetic
properties of speech. En Society of Automotive Engineers (Ed.), Alcohol, Accidents, and Injuries
(pp. 131-150). Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers.
487 Schiel, F. (2009). Laying the foundation for in-car alcohol detection by speech. En INTERSPEECH2009, Brighton, pp. 983-986.
488 Schiel, F. (2011). Perception of alcoholic intoxication in speech. En INTERSPEECH-2011, Florencia,
pp. 3281-3284.
21

Juana Gil. CSIC
489 Schiel, F., Heinrich, Ch. y Neumeyer, V. (2010). Rhythm and formant features for automatic alcohol
detection. En INTERSPEECH-2010, Chiba, 458-461.
490 Schiel, F., Heinrich, Ch. y Barfsser, S. (2011), Alcohol language corpus: The first public corpus of
alcoholized German speech. Language Resources and Evaluation, Berlin-New York:Springer,
491 Sigmund, M., Prokes, A. y Zelinka, P.. (2010). Detection of alcohol in speech signal using LF model.
En Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Innsbruck,
193-196.
492 Sigmund, M. y Zelinka, P. (2011). Analysis of voiced speech excitation due to alcohol intoxication.
Information Technology and Control, 40(2), 145-150.
493 Sobell, L. C. y Sobell, M. B. (1972). Effects of alcohol on the speech of alcoholics. Journal of
Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 861-868.
494 Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B. y Coleman, R. F. (1982). Alcohol-induced dysfluency in nonalcoholics.
Folia Phoniatrica, 34, 316-323.
495 Schuller, B., Steidl, S., Batliner, A., Schiel, F. y Krajewski, J. (2011). Speaker State Challenge.
Intoxication and Slepiness. 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication
Association (ISCA). INTERSPEECH-2011. Florencia. http://emotion-research.net/sigs/speechsig/is11-speaker-state-challenge
496 Stevens, K. N. (1971). Sources of inter- and intra-speaker variability in the acoustic properties of
speech sounds. En Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Montreal,
206 232.
497 Swartz, B. L. (1992). Resistance of voice onset time variability to intoxication. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 75, 415-424.
498 Trojan, F. y Kryspin-Exner, K. (1968). The decay of articulation under the influence of alcohol and
paraldehyde. Folia Phoniatrica, 20, 217-238.
499 Watanabe, H., Shin, T., Matsuo, H., Okuno, F., Tsuju, T., Matsuoka, M., Fukaura, J. y Matsunaga, H.
(1994). Studies on vocal fold injection and changes in pitch associated with alcohol intake. Journal
of Voice, 8, 340-346.
500 Zaimov, K. (1969). Die Sprachstrungen als Kriterium der Bewusstseinstrbungen. Psychiatrie,
Neurologie, und Medizinische Psychologie, 21, 218-225.
22

Bibliografía Fonética Judicial

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Bibliografía Fonética Judicial

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

FORENSIC PHONETICS. THEMATIC BIBLIOGRAPHY.

BIBLIOGRAFA TEMTICA DE FONTICA JUDICIAL

Sobre el efecto CSI:

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

69 Moosmller, S. (2010). IAFPA position on language analysis in asylum procedures. En K. Zwaan, P.

4 Sobre la diferenciacin de tareas y la especializacin terminolgica

5 Sobre las ruedas de reconocimiento de voz y la identificacin por testigos

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

89 Broeders, A. P. A. (1996). Earwitness identication: Common ground, disputed territory, and

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Applied Psychology, 65, 111116.

6 Sobre los distintos mtodos de anlisis

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

7 Sobre la tcnica basada en las huellas vocales

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

8 Sobre el rendimiento judicial comparado de los diferentes parmetros

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

9 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la estructura formntica

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

10 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la F0

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

11 Sobre el rendimiento judicial del LTAS

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

12 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de los rasgos temporales y de las pausas

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

13 Sobre el rendimiento judicial de la cualidad de la voz

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

14 Sobre la admisibilidad y la tica de los peritajes y sobre la formulacin de las conclusiones

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

15 Sobre la prueba pericial de voz en la legislacin espaola

16 Sobre la identificacin de voces disimuladas (transformacin)

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

17 Sobre la identificacin de voces disimuladas (conversin)

18 Sobre el efecto del telfono en la comparacin de voces

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

20 Sobre los efectos en el habla de la intoxicacin etlica

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Bibliografa Temtica de Fontica Judicial.

Você também pode gostar