Judicial Conduct Board LETTER Re COMPLAINT No. 2016-788 For JUDGE ASHWORTH and 2016-789 For JUDGE REINAKER Dated January 10, 2017

COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD

Pennsylvania Judicial Center
601 Commonwealth Ave., Suite 3500
P.O. Box 62525
Harrisburg, PA 17120-0901
Recd:
JCB No:
County:
(717)-234-7911
CONFIDENTIAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION

INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print. If you wish to provide documents to support your allegations, please attach copies of those
documents. We cannot return documents. The Boards jurisdiction extends only to Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices, Superior
and Commonwealth Court Judges, Common Pleas Court Judges, Philadelphia Municipal and Traffic Court Judges and Magisterial
District Judges. Once completed, you must sign and return this form to the address above.
NOTICE: The Judicial Conduct Board has no authority to change a Judges decisions or rulings. Our jurisdiction extends only to
conduct that violates the Code of Judicial Conduct or the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, which
may be found at our website at www.jcbpa.org.
Your Information:
Name:
Stan J. Caterbone
Address: 1250
Telephone:
( 717 ) 598-2200
Fremont Street
City: Lancaster
State: PA
Zip: 17603
Judicial Officers Information:

Name: Judge David Ashworth
Type of Judicial Officer:

Magisterial District Judge
County: Lancaster
Judge
Case Information: (If misconduct allegations relate to Court Proceedings.)
Case Has Been Appealed
Case Docket Number: CI-16-08472
Case Name: CATERBONE v. Lancaster General

Health, et.al.,
Your Attorney:
Opposing Attorney:
Witness:
Name: Stan
Name:
Name: Stan
J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Address: same
Phone: same
as above
as above
Address:
Phone:
J. Caterbone
Address:
Phone:
I certify that I have read the information concerning the Judicial Conduct Boards function, jurisdiction, and
procedures included in the accompanying brochure. I further swear (or affirm) that the above information is true
and accurate. The statements in this complaint are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 4904 (relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities).
Date:_December 12, 2016________
Your Signature:___________________________________________
Please explain your complaint on the reverse of this form.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM
Please use this page to explain your complaint, providing as much detail as possible.
Attach additional pages if needed.
Please note, it is not required that you present your grievance to the Board in person. Personal interviews are not required and are not
usually necessary for our preliminary review, investigation, and understanding of grievances. If we need further information relative to
your grievances, you will be contacted by phone or letter and arrangements will be made for an interview if deemed necessary.
1. On September 22, 2016 A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF FOR PAIN
MEDICATIONS AND A THERAPEUTIC SPA Via His Medicare Supplemental Insurance Was
Filed By Stan J. Caterbone, In Pro Se
2. On September 22, 2016 The Caption Entry Was Listed As: Stan J. Caterbone Vs. Lancaster
General Hospital; Abbeyville Family Medicine; Patient First Urgent Care; Southeast
Medical; Medexpress Urgent Care; Lancaster Regional Medical Center And The Lancaster
City Police
Department
3. On October 3, 2016 A Motion For A 30-Day Continuance, Was Filed By Stan J. Caterbone
4. On October 3, 2016 An Exhibit Was Filed By Stan J. Caterbone In Pro Se
5. On October 31, 2016 The Case Was Assigned To Judge Ashworth
6. On November 15, 2016 A Motion For Summary Judgment, Was Filed By Stan J. Caterbone
SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR YOUR REVIEW.

LEGALQUESTION AND COMPLAINT WHY DID THE JUDGE NOT RULE ON THE IN FORMA
PAUPERIS AND THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF?
THIS IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, A VIOLATION OF THE OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE CLAUSES, AND FURTHERS THE TORTURE PROGRAM BY NOT ALLOWING THE PLAITIFF
THE RELIEF REQUESTED AND COVERING UP THE ENTIRE CASE.
Dated: December 12, 2016
_ _________________________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Revised: 06/01/2009
JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth
Page 2 of 31
Monday December 12, 2016
PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Katherine Wood-Jacobs
Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL (et al.)
Case Number
CI-16-08472
PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES

09/22/2016
COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, IN PRO SE
09/22/2016
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL; ABBEYVILLE
FAMILY MEDICINE; PATIENT FIRST URGENT CARE; SOUTHEAST MEDICAL; MEDEXPRESS
URGENT CARE; LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
10/03/2016
MOTION FOR A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE, FILED
10/03/2016
EXHIBIT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE IN PRO SE
10/31/2016
CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH
11/15/2016
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED
December 09, 2016

Page 3 of 31
(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
CIVIL ACTION LAW

_______________________________________________________________________________
In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
PLAINTIFF
v.
Lancaster General Hospital
Dr. Brian Sullivan, Abbeyville Family Medicine
Patient First Urgent Care
Southeast Medical Center at Brightside Church
Medexpress Urgent Care
Dr. Anthony Mastropietro, Medical Director, Lancaster Regional Medical Center
Lancaster Regional Medical Center
Lancaster City Police Department
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Police Department
DEFENDANTS
Case No. CI- _____________
Preliminary Emergency Injunction for EMERGENCY Relief:

In-Home Spa and Pain Medications
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page
Page14of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction
OF TORTURE
for Emergency
PROGRAM
Relief
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FILING - FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS - Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief September 22, 2016
1. Cover Page - FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS - Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief September 21, 2016
1. PLAINTIFF ACTIVE COURT CASES
2. BACKGROUND OF CASE
3. Irreparable Harm
4. Jurisdiction for Injunction
5. Relief Sought
6. Declaration by the PLAINTIFF Stanley J. Caterbone
7. Statement by the PLAINTIFF Stanley J. Caterbone
8. ORDER
9. EXHIBIT PAGE
2. EXHIBITS - FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS AND TREATMENTS - Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief September 21,
2016
3. June 22, 2016 Claim to Humana Insurance for In-Home-Therapy-Spa
1. 1. January 29, 2016 MedExpress Medical File
2. January 29, 2016 - Smithgall Pharmacy Oxecotin Prescription from
MedExpress
1. January 29, 2016 MedExpress Medical Discharge Instructions and
Diagnosis
4. 2. October 7, 2015 Patient First Emergency Visit for Back and Groin Pain
5. 3. March 23, 2016 - MedExpress Medical File - Visit for Back and Groin Pain
1. March 23, 2016 - MedExpress Discharge Instructions with Percoset
Prescription
6. 4. May 10, 2016 - MedExpress Prescription for Oxycodone
1. May 10, 2016 - MedExpress Medical File - Visit for Back and Groin Pain
7. 5. Private Criminal Complaint v. Patient First Urgent Care and Southeast Medical
Clinic for Medial Malpractice
8. A. May 25, 2010 - Lancaster General Hospital No-Trespass Notice and Patient
Termination Notice
9. B. August 5, 2015 - Approved PERMANENT Penn DOT Handicapp Placard
Application
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page
Page51of
of31
4
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction
OF TORTURE
for Emergency
PROGRAM
Relief
10.6. September 11, 2009 -MEDICAL FILE from Dr. Sullivan of Abbeyville Family
Health for Back Pain
11.7. December 11, 2015 - Medical File from LGH Plastic Cosmetic Surgery Group re
Cyst Removal
1. C. LGH Plastic Cosmetic Surgery Group Listing Current Medications Including
Vicodin
12.D. January 2008 - Article by Expert Cheryl Welsh Titled "CIA "No Touch" Torture
Makes Sense Out of Mind Control Allegations
13.8. MedExpress Pain Visit and Prescriptions for Pain on Saturday August 19, 2016
DR. WOULD NOT EVEN INTERVIEW ME
14.9. June 10, 2016 - Lancaster Regional Medical Center Pitt Bull Attack at 1252
Fremont St. Emergency Room Medical File of June 10, 2016
1. PHOTOS
2. Lancaster Regional Medical Center EMERGENCY ROOM MEDICAL FILE
3. HYDROCODENE PRESCRIPTION
15.E. TABLE OF CONTENTS: EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies of
Targeted Individuals and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Published by Advanced
Media Group September 17, 2016
1. 1. Background of Stan J. Caterbone as a Targeted Individual
2. 2. In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom CIA No-Touch Torture Makes
Sense, by Cheryl Welsh 2008
1. Table of contents
2. Introduction
3. I. A university professor uncovers CIA no touch
4. II. The beginnings of CIA no touch torture and how it
5. III. What is no touch torture?
6. IV. An example of no touch torture
7. V. The long history of U.S. Torture
8. VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control
9. VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research
10.VIII. Why CIA no touch torture has been so successful
11.IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing
12.X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW,
13.XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of no touch
14.XII. The three key behavioral components of no touch
15.XIII. Torture as a kind of total theater
16.XIV. A comparison of no touch torture to mind
17.XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation
18.XVI. Comparing no touch torture techniques of
19.XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on
16.3. Allstate Sworn Testimony of Stan J. Caterbone TRANSCRIPT Volume 2 and
Volume 1 July 12, 2016
17.4. Transcript of the Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19, 2015 Passing
a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based Weapons in Support of the Many
Targeted Individuals Suffering Symptoms of the City.
18.News Articles of Richmond City Council Resolution To Ban Spaced Based Weapons
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page
Page62of
of31
4
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction
OF TORTURE
for Emergency
PROGRAM
Relief
19.5. Karen Stewart, NSA Whistleblower and Targeted Individual
1. Transcript "There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and
sociopaths "
2. The Interview: EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its
Corruption by Karen Stewart
3. NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light by Karen
Stewart
4. Second Interview
20.6. Julianne McKinney, US Army Intelligence Officer, Whistleblower, and Targeted
Individual
1. Transcript Of Greg Szymanskis Interview With Julianne Mckinney
21.7. Dr. Nick Begich, Author and Expert Researcher of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1. October 1, 2015 Nick Begich Lecture at the Covert Harassment Conference
in Berlin, Germany
22.8. Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group Executive Summary
1. 1. Advanced Media Group Anti-Harassment Legislation and Executive
Summary
2. 2. Letter from Pennsylvania Representative Mike Sturla re Organized
Stalking Bill of June 8, 2009
3. 3.PRESS RELEASE - Stan J. Caterbone Anti-Stalking Proposed Legislation
4. 4. Cover Page for Executive Summary
5. 5. Executive Summary
6. 6. Updates for Executive Summary October 10, 2015
7. 7. History of Federal Whistleblowing Case and Targeted Individual
8. 9. The Courts and the United States Legal System
9. 10. Family History
10.11. The Public Record
11.12. Is Lancaster County Ground Zero for U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
12.13. Affidavit of Joinment of October 10, 2015
13.14. 29 FALSE ARRESTS RECORD Since 1987
14.15. 28 ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES
15.16. Stan Caterbone's Notarized Affidavit for FFCHS September 16, 2010
Redacted Version
16.17. Stan Caterbone's Detailed Victimization Affidavit of 2010
17.18. Samuel P Caterbone US Sponsored Mind Control Affidavit 1996
18.19. Sammy A. Caterbone Affidavit of US Sponsored Mind Control 1991
23.9. 1975 TESTIMONY FROM DIRECTOR OF CIA STANSFIELD TURNER for the 1975
United States Senate Select Hearings on Mkultra
1. MKultra Part 1.pdf
10.MKultra Part 10.pdf
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page
Page73of
of31
4
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction
OF TORTURE
for Emergency
PROGRAM
Relief
24.10. Proposed U.S. Government Settlement for TI via Change.org Petition by Stan
J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group March 17, 2016 with Affidavit and Kane
Op Ed Letter Sent to President Obama
1. Letter re Good Old Boys Coup of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen
Kane's Attorney General Office
2. Stan J. Caterbone Affidavit
3. Bill Keisling of Newslanc.com "Palace Coup - What the Kathleen Kane
Prosecution is Really About"
25.F. PACTS [People Against Covert Torture & Surveillance, International, Formerly
FFCHS] TARGETED INDIVIDUALS TESTIMONIALS
1. Introduction
2. Table of Contents
3. Background
4. Bio-Electromagnetic Weapons
5. Gang Stalking
6. Testimonials
7. FEDERAL STATUTES
8. 2015 City of Richmond Califonia Resolution Banning Spaced Based
Weapons
9. Letters
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page
Page84of
of31
4
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016
Page 9 of 31
Page 10 of 31
Page 11 of 31
Page 12 of 31
Page 13 of 31

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF

In-Home Spa and Pain Medications
AND NOW, on this 21st day of September, 2016 I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, Plaintiff's, appearing pro se, and In Forma Pauperis, do hereby file a Preliminary
Injunction for EMERGENCY Relief according to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1531(a). In determining whether a
preliminary or special injunction should be granted and whether notice or a hearing
should be required, the court may act on the basis of the averments of the pleadings or
petition and may consider affidavits of parties or third persons or any other proof which
the court may require. Pa. R. Civ. P. 1531(a). The decision whether or not to grant a
hearing on an emergency injunction is therefore left to the sound discretion of the court;
the mere filing of a motion by the plaintiff does not automatically entitle him to a
hearing.
Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 126 Liberal Construction and Application of Rules, which states "the
rules shall be liberally construed to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every
action or proceeding to which they are applicable. The court at every stage of any such action or
proceeding may disregard any error or defect of procedure which does not affect the substantial
rights of the parties.
Date: September 22, 2016
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page 14
2 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
ACTIVE COURT CASES FOR STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGANT

1. J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 153400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
2. U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Appeal; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
3. U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4641 Petition for Habeus
Corpus; Case No. 16-cv-4014 2005 Conitued Case; Case No. 16-cv-49 Chapter 11
Appeal; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650,
08-02982;
4. U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
5. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462

Complaint against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
6. Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 495 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Residents; Case No. 496 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster City Police Dept.; Case No.
353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
7. Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-MD-1219 Preliminary Emergency

Injunction; AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA
2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
8. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349,
CI-06-03401
9.
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page 15
3 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
BACKGROUND OF CASE
For the past 11 years the pain attacks have been regular and consistent with pain levels of
10 out of 10. The PLAINTIFF has been treated by conventional medical providers since 2005. In
1987 the PLAINTIFF began experiencing back spasms and back pain in 1987.
In August of 1987
the Avalon Police Department had pulled the PLAINTIFF over and a black plastic film container was
confiscated and tested for containing illegal drugs. The PLAINTIFF had declared the pills were overthe-counter muscle relaxers for pain and suffering due to back pain purchased at a drug store. The
pills were tested and found to be the over-the-counter muscle relaxers the PLAINTIFF had declared.
Most recently, as of last week the PLAINTIFF has been treated with Laser Therapy and Adjustments
by Dr. Paul Newhart, a chiropractor with a practice in Leola, Pennsylvania. The PLAINTIFF has been
a
patient since 2005.
From 2010 to 2015 the PATIENT had been using his inventory of pain
medications that were not used in 2009 and 2010. The last time pain medications were prescribed
to the PLAINTIFF was on June 10, 2016 in the EMERGENCY ROOM of the Lancaster Regional
Medical Center when the PLAINTIFF was purposefully and maliciously attacked by the pitt bull of
the hostile residents of 1252 Fremont Street, which was a successful effort to stop the PLAINTIFF
from continuance the construction and installation of a screened-in-porch and renovated fence and
yard. All efforts have been ceased since that date and building materials sit unused.
In 2009 the PLAINTIFF, after again experiencing harassment by medical staff at Mastropietro
Family Medicine, visited the ABBEYVILLE FAMILY PRACTICE on Abbeyville Road in
Pennsylvania.
Lancaster,
The medical staff notified the PLAINTIFF that two (2) Family Physicians were
accepting patients; Dr. Brian Sullivan and Dr. Denise Copley. The PLAINTIFF selected Dr. Denise
Copley and an appointment was made for a physical and medical review after waiting for the
medical file to be transferred from Mastropietro and Associates.
Upon arrival for the physical to
start the treatment of pain, the ABBEYVILLE FAMILY PRACTICE refused to honer the original
agreement and made the PLAINTIFF be treated by Dr. Brian Sullivan (Irish).
In 2009 Dr. Brian Sullivan was prescribing Vicodin at 60 tablet prescriptions as needed for
pain.
Most of the prescriptions were refiled by a phone call.
Then on March 22, 2010 after
harassing treatment by the medical staff and Dr. Sullivan the PLAINTIFF legally and with merit tape
recorded an office visit to review the treatments for the daily pain and suffering the PLAINTIFF was
experiencing on a daily basis. Dr. Brian Sullivan tried desperately to dispute the fact of symptoms
and illnesses of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, which was already supported and verified by the
Social Security Administration in the Award of Benefits the year before, 2009. The PLAINTIFF in an
effort to counter the libel and slander campaign, posted the recording on his WORDPRESS blog.
THE LANCASETER GENERAL HOSPOITAL retaliated by filing a formal NO TRESPASS NOTICE to the
PLAINTIFF that includes any or all facilities owned and operated by the LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, which includes most FAMILY DOCTORS in or around the City of Lancaster.
The
PLAINTIFF filed a civil action v. Lancaster General Hospital in 2006 that is still not adjudicated in
the legal
sense.
JUDICIAL
Lancaster
COMPLAINT
County
Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page 16
4 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
In 2016 the PLAINTIFF
was prescribed opiod pain medications for pain and
suffering in the back and groin area on January 29, 2016; March 23, 2016; May 10, 2016
and finally June 10, 2016 by the Lancaster Regional Medical Center.
The MedExpress
facility has been prescribing opiods (Vicoden and Hydrocodene) on a regular basis but
had ceased to continue the prescriptions for no reasons in July and August of 2016. The
visits were used to harass and torture the PLAINTIFF by refusing to adhere to the
HYPOCRATIC OATH OF DO NO HARM. THE PLAINTIFF HAS EXTENSIVE DOCUMENTATION
INCLUDING PAIN LOGS WHICH DETAIL THE PAIN AND THE DOSES OF THE OPIOD
MEDICATIONS. Due to the PLAINTIFF's efforts to minimize change in tolerance of the
medications, the PLAINTIFF uses a strategy of only taking pill doses and uses other
counter measures to offset the change in tolerance which leads most patients to needing
higher doses over time which then leads to addiction problems. Muscle Relaxers were
also prescribed but DO NOT provide the pain relief needed and have a side effect of a
sedative nature.
In 2009 the PLAINTIFF, appearing pro se, applied for Social Security Disability Benefits for
symptoms and illnesses related to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control. Included in the application and
Approval process was the submittal of medical files and declarations regarding the pain and
suffering of pain the groin and back.
The PLAINTIFF's case was reviewed by the Office of
Vocational Assessment and in August of 2009 the Social Security Administration AWARDED benefits
and declared the PLAINTIFF disabled as of December of 2005.
A check for $21,456.00 was
awarded for retroactive benefits back to April of 2008, according to federal law. The PLAINTIFF is
considered a CHRONIC case according to Social Security Administration Police which is evidenced
by the fact that a BENEFICIARY REVIEW is only conducted every seven (7) years, whereas all other
beneficiaries are reviewed ever three (3) years. The first review for the PLAINTIFF was conducted
in 2015, which is seven (7) years from the 2008 date of benefits. The PLAINTIFF contains some
200 pages of authentic documents as evidence.
In 2015 the PLAINTIFF applied for and was granted a PERMANENT HADICAPP
PLACARD from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation for pain and suffering of
groin and back pain.
The Placard does not renew until September of 2020 and was
signed by Dr. Paul Newhart of Leola.

In April of 2016 the PLAINTIFF communicated with Medicare requesting the
benefit of an in-home-therapy-spa. The PLAINTIFF had a hot tub since 1996 and found it
to be of tremendous help in alleviating pain and allowing more flexibility which in turn
allowed for more stretching and exercising. In 2012 the PLAINTIFF sold his outdoor hot
tub. Medicare informed the PLAINTIFF that such benefits are routinely awarded and
instructed the PLAINTIFF to petition HUMANA Insurance through the PLAINTIFF'S
JUDICIAL COMPLAINT
Lancaster
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page 17
5 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
Medicare Supplemental Insurance Policy. On April 22, 2016 the PLAITIFF was visited by
a Nurse from the firm MEDICAL MATRIX, which is a third party vendor for HUMANA
INSURANCE that provides an In-Home Consultation to update any the medical files of the
insureds and provide any services that may be needed.
The Medical Matrix Nurse
promised to submit a request for the In-Home-Spa that the PLAINTIFF had specifically
researched for to accommodate the upstairs bathroom. Nothing had happened since the
visit so on June 21, 2016 the PLAINTIFF filed a 100 page MEDICAL CLAIM with authentic
medical files to support the claim. Again, after numerous attempts, HUMANA refuses to
acknowledge the CLAIM.
During the current period of Medicare Policy Exchanges, the
PLAINTIFF will seek another Medicare Supplemental Plan.

The Lancaster City Police Department, specifically Detective Clark Bearinger, has
been engaged in a slander campaign of mass proportions since 2005, which included
several false arrests. There was an overt and obvious intent to derail all of the civil and
criminal claims in federal and state courts that the PLAINTIFF has filed since 2005.
These efforts include fabricated allegations of mental illness and fabricated activities
used on numerous involuntary psychiatric commitments, or 302 petitions.
It is these
efforts and the illegal and criminal involuntary psychiatric commitments which the
MEDICAL-COMMUNTIY-AT-LARGE uses to refuse the prescriptions of pain medications
resulting in a mass torture campaign and a criminal conspiracy to commit a landmark
case of obstruction of justice.
Since 2005 the PLAINTIFF has been prescribed opiod pain medications from a variety of
physicians and medical facilities. They include the following:
1.
Lancaster General Hospital
2.
Lancaster Regional Medical Center
3.
Dr. Anthony Mastropietro Family Practice
4.
Dr. Brian Sullivan, Abbeyville Family Practice
5.
Patient First Urgent Care, Butler Avenue Office
6.
MedExpress, Rohrerstown Road Office
7.
Lancaster Plastic Surgery Center

The PLAINTIFF has used the following treatments and therapies to counter the pain and
suffering in the back and groin areas with success:

1.
Spa Therapies, hot tubs and whirlpool baths
2.
Message Therapies
3.
Laser-Light Therapies
4.
Stretching and basic excising
5.
Walking
6. Bicycling
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page 18
6 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
The PLAINTIFF currently uses the following medical devices and aids in his home:
1.
Handicap Rails for basement toilet
2.
Toilet Seat Riser in upstairs bathroom
3.
Tommy Copper back and knee braces
4.
Standard Walker
5.
PennDOT Handicap Placard
6.
Elevated Computer on Desk to stand while using the computer
7.
Shoe Inserts
8.
2 - 3ft pickers used to retrieve objects without bending over
9.
Memory Foam Adjustable Bed with Vibrating at the lower and upper regions
Irreparable Harm: The irreparable harm and injure that has resulted from the above
circumstances includes but is not limited to the following:
1. EXCRUCIATING PAIN AND SUFFERING ON A DAILY BASIS.

2. Loss of personal property and real estate.
3. Loss of opportunity to secure personal property, business assets, and court related
assets, information, and evidence; including when sleeping (rape drug rohypnol).
4. Loss of protection from law enforcement at every level; local, state, and federal.
5. Loss of relationships including family; friends; and professional.
6. Loss of time and loss of life as a normal person would know it.
7. Loss of freedom of movement in Downtown Lancaster Entertainment Venues and
Constant and Never Ending Threats of Physical Harm, Harassment, Over-Charging on
Cost of Goods, intimidation, discrimination, and barring from entering public places
and entertainment venues, violations of intellectual property rights, and obstruction
of justice.
8. Loss of freedom of movement; complainant has been denied every opportunity to

secure his personal and business assets at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania making it impossible to travel or leave for any amount of time without
fear of harm.
9. Loss of freedom of movement may constitute false imprisonment and may invoke the
federal habeas corpus laws of freedom.
10. Loss of female companionship, and under constant mocking for it.
11. Loss of business opportunities.
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page 19
7 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF

There are six essential prerequisites that a party must establish prior to obtaining a Preliminary
Emergency Injunction For Relief:
1) that the injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be
adequately compensated by damages;
2) that greater injury would result from refusing an injunction than from granting it, and,
concomitantly, that issuance of an injunction will not substantially harm other interested parties in
the proceedings;
3) that a preliminary injunction will properly restore the parties to their status as it existed
immediately prior to the alleged wrongful conduct;
4) that the activity it seeks to restrain is actionable, that its right to relief is clear, and that the
wrong is manifest, or, in other words, that it is likely to prevail on the merits;
5) that the injunction it seeks is reasonably suited to abate the offending activity; and,
6) that a preliminary injunction will not adversely affect the public interest
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page 20
8 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
RELIEF SOUGHT BY PLAINTIFF

The Complainant seeks immediate relief from the above in the form of A COURT
ORDER FOR MEDEXPRESS TO CONTINUE THE PRESCRIPTIONS OF PAIN MEDICATIONS
AND
AN
ORDER
FOR
HUMANA
TO
PROVIDE
FUNDS
FOR
THE
PURCHASE
AND
INSTALLATION OF THE IN-HOME-SPA.

Date September 22, 2016
______/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth
Page 21
9 ofof813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
DECLARATION: I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250

Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years
of age, that I am a citizen or a legal resident of the United States of America, that I am of sound
mind, and that I am the person whose signature follows on this Preliminary Emergency Injunction
for Relief. The purpose of this document is (1) to advise the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas as well as state and local officials of the participation of the residents of Lancaster County in
organized stalking and/or electronic and mind manipulation torture being committed against me
and (2) to request a cease and desist order of their participation of the activities described herein.
Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that
covertly harass, torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through
organized stalking and remote electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that
certain elements of Government either engage in these activities or protect those who perform
them. I seek the complete dismantling of any officially-sanctioned covert Government torture
programs, and organized stalking and harassment programs and the passage of legislation
specifically outlawing that high-tech torture, and the full prosecution of any person, regardless of
his rank or position, who has violated my civil rights and my most basic human rights.
The
assaults on my mind, body, person, property, intellectual property, and business interests have
been occurring for 29 year(s)
and include, but are not limited to the following
victimization's:
1.Blanketing
my
dwelling
and
surroundings
with
electromagnetic
energy.
Bombarding my body with debilitating electronic and mind manipulation effects.

Directed Energy Weapons Causing Severe Pain to Body and Brain.
Began in at least
2005 and still continuing, with complaints to Freedom From Covert Harassment and
Surveillance, FFCHS in 2009, and in cited in various state and federal court cases over the past
several years.
Attacks causing severe artificial pain most likely from Directed Energy Devices
synchronized with telepathic harassment and organized stalking and harassment have been
logged and reported to law enforcement and medical professionals since 2008.
Prior to 2008
the attacks were experienced and reported to medical professionals but the sources were not
known.
Also reported attacks of pain to a family physician, emergency room personnel and
psychiatrists.
2.Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies.
Was sent an autonomous
email in 1998 introducing the term remote viewing. Various technologies and tactics are being
used to create emotional signatures that induce various emotional states; a systematic
complete hacking of my mind.
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page10
22of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
3.Making me mentally hear others' voices through the microwave hearing effect.
Synthetic and/or Mental Telepathy. First started to experience telepathy/synthetic
telepathy in 2005 with full-time 24/7 connection during the same time to present. When fulltime telepathy started a male conducted interrogations lasting several hours at a time
concerning a wealth of subjects including ISC/CIA Knowledge.
Cannot disconnect from
continuous conversations at all times with one female person. The handlers know everything I
know and experience in real time. During 2006 and 2007 have been telepathic with some 10 or
more persons, both male and female for short durations. Can recall most conversations and
subject matter with identities of who they said they were. Interrogation type harassment is still
being used telepathically to harass and for some sleep deprivation. Made first complaints to
DARPA, the FBI, and U.S. Senator Arlen Specter in 2007. Some conversations by the persons
that are telepathic with me elude to some program similar to the DARPA datalog program
where they record your entire life.
Everything that you try to do on a daily basis is subject
matter for conversation and harassment.
Interference with thought, harassment, and
interrogation is used often times with electromagnetic weapon attacks to the brain or body.
4.Depriving me of sleep due to neurological intervention. Mostly Experienced Sleep

Deprivation Techniques during periods of time in 2008 to 2010.
Mostly with attacks of pain
from Directed Energy Weapons to back, neck, head (brain); and heart on a few occasions; and
with harassment from telepathy.
5.Introducing poisonous gas and radiation toxins into my home.

gases (Chloroform?) in heavy doses in 2006-2007.
Police Department and the Southern Regional Police.
First experienced toxic
Made complaints to the Lancaster City

Experienced attacks that would cause
dizziness at home, in automobile and in public. Was informed it was being released through a
distribution system the size of fishing line. To counter attacks used cotton in nostrils and gas
mask. In 2009 experienced attacks of what is said to be sleeping gas, when attacked could not
open eyes. Took Pictures during some attacks.
6.Having me stalked en masse on foot and in vehicles. vandalizing my home and/or

car.
Gang Stalking or Organized Stalking began in 1987 and continues today.
It includes
strangers using gestures such as finger under eye; various forms of harassment; and public
mobbing. Complaints have been filed in 1987; 1992;1998 and 2005 to 2010. Complaints were
made to various public officials and local, state, and federal agencies as mental duress. The
terms organized stalking, gang stalking, targeted individual, etc., was not learned until a few
years ago. The organized stalking and harassment followed in several states, some while
traveling from Lancaster, Pennsylvania to California. Tracking technologies may have been used
and most likely are still being used. Police were involved in most places.
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page11
23of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
7.Tapping (Bugging) my phones.
Complaints of phone tapping/tampering were made to
New Jersey Bell in 1987 with a service call to Stone Harbor, New Jersey to check lines and
phones. The same was done by a Bell Atlantic repairman in Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1998.
In 2004 a complaint with a report number was filed with the Pennsylvania Attorney General
Office in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Agent Amy Zelnick) regarding interference with phone calls
and impersonations by perps intercepting and rerouting calls.
Computer Hacking complaints
were filed to local authorities in the County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to 2010.
8.Blacklisting me in the labor market. Filed complains of employment discrimination with

the Pennsylvania Attorney General in 2006 and the Lancaster County Human Relations
Commission in 2008.
9.Workplace mobbing. Experienced in 1987 at Financial Management Group, Ltd., American

Helix of High Industries in 1991 and Pflumm Contractors, Inc., in 1997/1998. Filed complaints
and logs as mental duress and harassment. Was forced out of all 3 organizations as a result of
the mobbing and harassment.
10.Public Mobbing.
Public type mobbing and organized stalking and harassment was
perpetrated heavily in the years 2005 to 2010 in the following places: The Lancaster County
Courthouse, The Lancaster County Public Library, the Pennsylvania Career Link, and the
Millersville University Library and University Offices.
I was given suspicious and illegal No
Trespass Notices in some 18 public places in Lancaster County in the years 2005 to 2009
without just cause.
I was complaining of stalking and harassing in most all of those public
places. The Lancaster County Public Library and the Millersville University took away my access
to a computer after my personal computers were vandalized and/or hacked inoperable. Fulton
Bank took away my safe deposit box. Others included my church of worship, various bars and
restaurants and one attorneys office. Complaints have been filed regarding the same in courts
and with various authorities.
11.Attempted Murder.
Experienced with an attempt of vehicular homicide in 1991 after
National News Media reported ISC/CIA-NSA connection of Arms to Irag.
The incident
involved a vehicle changing lanes and direction and heading directly toward me in the wrong
direction running me off the road, narrowly missing a tree. I Filed the incident in federal courts
and used as a motion to seal federal case no. 05-2288 in 2005 in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
12.Pet Killing.
Cat was killed in 2005 with complaints to the Lancaster County Humane
Shelter and the Southern Regional Police Department.

Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page12
24of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
13.Illegal Entries of Home/Properties.
First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then
again in 1991; 1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010.
Filed Police Reports and
insurance claims, most with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga,
Pennsylvania , State Farm and Harleysville Insurance Companies.
14.Illegal
Repossessions.
Airplane
in
1987
containing
legal
and
business
files.
Home/Property and Contents in 2006 also containing legal and business files and documents.
15.Physical Assaults. One attack and filed complaint with police report in Los Osos California
in 2005 and one in the City of Lancaster. Police reports were filed and obtained for both.
16.False Arrests. Experienced 7 in 1987 and more than 20 in 2005 and 2006 in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
The false arrests
were charges that were all dismissed prior to court hearings.
17.False Imprisonments. Spent 7 to 10 days in Lancaster County Prison in 1987 with all
charges dismissed and again for some 60 days in 2006 with all charges dismissed. The 60 Days
of imprisonment of 2006 was triggered with a false report of missing a bail supervision meeting,
which was confirmed to be false in court; however bail was maliciously and purposefully
reinstated as secured instead of unsecured. The appropriate appeal was filed which secured my
release after some 60 days of false imprisonment. There were no charges that resulted in any
convictions.
18.Psychiatric Abuses with False Suicide Allegations from Perpetrators/Stalkers. One

in 1987 resulting in a forced hospitalization for several hours by police in Stone Harbor, New
Jersey. And one again in February of 2005 resulting in police restraining me in my home and
abusing me.
This one was a fraudulent and phony email sent to police by a perp.
The
Southern Regional Police had to vacate after the email was proven to be a fraud.
19.Vandalism to Property. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991;
1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most
with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania
and Harleysville
Insurance Company. 3 computers have been rendered inoperable since 2005 along with various
electronics equipment; dvd recorders; printers; household items; appliances; etc.,
Most
insurance claims have been paid. In the past years a wave of purchased items, online and in
stores, were received broken or the wrong item and all had to be returned.
Some included
items to secure my property, and others included computer related items, others were
household and clothing items.
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page13
25of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
20.Gas Lighting.
The illegal entering of home and causing psychological duress by moving
items and or hiding items.
First reported in 1998 to the Conestoga Police and continued to
present. Clothing was also manipulated and altered. The term gas lighting was only learned
in 2010, although it was reported to police as harassment by neighbors of friends. The daily
draining of my hot tub was also used as a psychological warfare tactic and used to run up utility
bills. Numerous complaints were made to police in 2008 to 2010.
21.Thefts of Property.
As evidenced by various police complaints, insurance claims, and
incident reports.
22.Vandalism to Car/Truck. Since 2005 have experienced years of gas siphoning, battery
outages, letting air out of tires, and wetting of inside of floor mats as psychological warfare
tactics by perps and stalkers.
Made numerous complaints the Lancaster City Police
Department.
23.Toxic Chemical Causing Running Nose. Experienced on regular basis in 2009 when in
public places. Was not in conjunction with cold/flu symptoms. Research states it is a tactic
used in organized stalking.
24.Computer Hacking.
Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the
County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to
2010. Numerous complaint numbers have been secured. Complaints of cell phone hacking was
also reported in 2010. Websites and blogs were regularly hacked and sometimes taken off-line.
Electronic calenders, court documents, and financial records were often hacked causing many
problems of the years, including having to withdraw civil complaints.
25.Cyber Stalking.
Most in 2005 to 2010.
Complaints to Microsoft legal counsel, Yahoo
Message Board, and the FBI Cyber Crime Unit.
26.Interference/Delay/Theft of U.S. Mails. First reported to U.S. Postmaster of mail

tampering and illegal changing of address in 1987. In 2008 to 2009 have made several more
complaints to the U.S. Postmaster Inspector General who claim to have begun investigations.
Some caused missed court hearings and other missed appointments and or meetings.
27.Electromagnetic
Weapons
Causing
Severe
Muscle
Spasms/Cramps.
First
experienced in 2006 to present. One experience in 2006 was while I was in my hot tub and the
pain and cramp was so severe in my left calf muscle (you automatically bend over to rub it out,
which placed my head underwater) I had to crawl out of the hot tub before almost drowning.
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page14
26of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
28.Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Sexual Stimulation. First experienced in 2005.
29.Forced Hospitalizations. Forced Hospitalizations in 1987 (2) one for 6 hours and one for
5 days; 2006 one for 3 days; 2009 one for several hours while in intensive care for emergency
surgery; and 2010 one for 8 days. Filed complaints to Citizens Commission for Human Rights in
1991 and 2008.
30.Manipulation and Theft of Documents. Numerous thefts and manipulation of all legal
and business documents both in paper and in electronic format have occurred since 1987.
Microfiche/Microfilming began in 1987 and other measures to secure documents have been
ongoing to present. Numerous complaints have been filed with law enforcement since 1987.
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page15
27of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
Statement: I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim most likely since 1987. In 1987 I
blew the whistle (public Allegations and Complaints to State and Federal Authorities regarding
Fraud during merger negotiations with British Defense Contractor Ferranti International) on an
international defense contractor named International Signal & Control, or ISC, who was selling
arms (Everything from Telemetry Systems to Cluster Bombs) to Iraq via South Africa and was
convicted of a $1 Billion dollar Fraud in 1992 by the United States Attorney and several other
federal agencies.
See ABC/News 20/20 and Nightline in 1991. They were founded and
headquartered in my hometown of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited

by a top ISC Executives (Convicted as a Mastermind of the Billion Dollar Fraud) to help finance
some of their operations through an affiliate called United Chem Con.
ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States
Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's.
One of it's first contracts was
Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland. Former Secretary of
the Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was on the Board of Directors of ISC and was also on the Board of
Directors of Science Applications International Corporation, or SAIC.
SAIC was a huge defense
contractor that was the recipient of the Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA, program on Remote
Viewing, which SAIC named Project Stargate. It was reported that Bobby Ray Inman declined the
nomination for Secretary of Defense under the first Clinton Administration because of the ISC and
Trecor scandals.
In the early 1990's I was a subcontractor on a project for the Defense Advanced
Research Project Agency, or DARPA, with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or
NIST called TIMIT.
The project developed speech corpora for the development of computer based
speech recognition systems. I was also involved in the bidding of other Department of Defense
contracts dealing with information technologies.
In 1998 I was stalked and approached by an
employee of the National Security Agency, or NSA in York, Pennsylvania who said my problems
were not with the NSA, but the good ole boys.
In 2005 I was detained by 2 Defense Intelligence
Agency, or DIA officers in a museum on a military base in Austin, Texas and was questioned and
interviewed regarding my civil actions filed in federal court for several hours. I was released and
told to stay off of all military bases. My brother, a Family Physician in Austin Texas had to verify my
travel plans and the fact that I was staying with him prior to my release.
My father alleged he was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced
synthetic telepathy in the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's as outlined in memos and documents he had
authored; and from my personal conversations with him prior to his death. Ms. Amy Fuchs of the
Disclosure Project confirmed that he was most likely given an ET experience via synthetic
telepathy. He died a suspicious death in 2001 when he, like me experienced pain and was not able
to walk. He summoned me to his New York City apartment on Memorial Day Weekend of 2001 to
help him navigate his apartment and get him food. Six weeks later he died of an alleged form of
lung cancer.
the
timing of
his16
death
in
that he had
JUDICIAL
Lancaster
COMPLAINT
County Unfortunately
Court- of
Judge
Common
David
Pleas
Ashworth
Page
Page
28
of
of813
31is even more suspicious
Monday
September
December
22, 2016
12,

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
just received his $70,000 payout from his inheritance of his Mother, Mary Caterbone,
who had passed in 2000.
HE HAD LIVED A LIFE OF DESTITUTE SINCE 1980! This is
consistent with how lethal these weapons can be.
My brother was in the U.S. Air Force in the late 1960's and I allege was a victim of the LSD
experiments relating to MKULTRA in the late 1960's and a victim of murder (Suspicious Suicide with
tainted medical reports) in Santa Barbara California in 1984; The PLAINTIFF had filed Notarized
Complaints to the California Attorney General in 1991. He made a declaration type statement prior
to his death that he got bad LSD while in the U.S. Air Force.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I thought that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed". During the times that legal Counsel and attorneys were solicited in 1987, 1991, and 1997
Organized Stalking and Harassment and other forms of attacks experienced by Targeted Individuals
were severely increased. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of
mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy
devices and/or electromagnetic weapons.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began
simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This targeting has ruined every aspect of my life and must be stopped as much as
possible by eliminating the residents of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania from participating.

___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page17
29of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
Court of COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
CIVIL ACTION LAW

______________________________________________________________________________
In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
Plaintiffs
Case No. CI-______________
ORDER
The Plaintiff's Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group are requesting your honor to
expeditiously prepare an ORDER that provides the immediate and expeditious relief requested in
the PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR RELIEF dated _____________________.
___________________________________
J.
Dated:
_________________________________

_/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page18
30of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016

Preliminary
FURTHERENCE
Injunction OF
for TORTURE
EMERGENCY
PROGRAM
RELIEF
EXHIBITS
Lancaster COMPLAINT
JUDICIAL
County Court- of
Judge
Common
DavidPleas
Ashworth Page
Page19
31of
of813
31
MondaySeptember
December 12,
22, 2016
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD

Pennsylvania Judicial Center
601 Commonwealth Ave., Suite 3500
P.O. Box 62525
Harrisburg, PA 17120-0901
Recd:
JCB No:
County:
(717)-234-7911
CONFIDENTIAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION

INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print. If you wish to provide documents to support your allegations, please attach copies of those
documents. We cannot return documents. The Boards jurisdiction extends only to Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices, Superior
and Commonwealth Court Judges, Common Pleas Court Judges, Philadelphia Municipal and Traffic Court Judges and Magisterial
District Judges. Once completed, you must sign and return this form to the address above.
NOTICE: The Judicial Conduct Board has no authority to change a Judges decisions or rulings. Our jurisdiction extends only to
conduct that violates the Code of Judicial Conduct or the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, which
may be found at our website at www.jcbpa.org.
Your Information:
Name:
Stan J. Caterbone
Address: 1250
Telephone:
( 717 ) 598-2200
Fremont Street
City: Lancaster
State: PA
Zip: 17603
Judicial Officers Information:

Name: President
Type of Judicial Officer:
Judge Dennis Reinaker
Magisterial District Judge
County: Lancaster
Judge
Case Information: (If misconduct allegations relate to Court Proceedings.)

Case Name: Commonwealth
v. Stanley J. Caterbone
Case Has Been Appealed
Case Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Your Attorney:
Opposing Attorney:
Witness:
Name: Stan
Name:
Name: Stan
J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Address: same
Phone: same
as above
as above
Address:
Phone:
J. Caterbone
Address:
Phone:
I certify that I have read the information concerning the Judicial Conduct Boards function, jurisdiction, and
procedures included in the accompanying brochure. I further swear (or affirm) that the above information is true
and accurate. The statements in this complaint are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 4904 (relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities).
Date:_December 9, 2016________
Your Signature:___________________________________________
Please explain your complaint on the reverse of this form.
JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD COMPLAINT
Page 1 of 37
Friday December 9, 2016
Please use this page to explain your complaint, providing as much detail as possible.
Attach additional pages if needed.
Please note, it is not required that you present your grievance to the Board in person. Personal interviews are not required and are
not usually necessary for our preliminary review, investigation, and understanding of grievances. If we need further information
relative to your grievances, you will be contacted by phone or letter and arrangements will be made for an interview if deemed
necessary.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
On October 28, 2016 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, mailed a NOTICE OF APEAL TO SUPERIOR
COURT via USPS Priority Mail Tracking No. 9405 5036 9930 0417 6700 86 to the CLERK OF
COURT of LANCASTER COUNTY. The tracking delivery confirmation reads Your item has been
delivered and is available at a PO Box at 8:28 am on October 31, 2016 in LANCASTER,
PA 17608. In it contained the NOTICE, an In Forma Pauperis Application, and a Money
Order for $75.00 from PNC Bank on Duke Street, across the street from the Lancaster
County Courthouse, No. 00677971.
On December 7, 2016 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se did an audit of Pennsylvania MDA Superior
Court cases and found no docket number for the filed appeal. A call was made to the
Prothonotary at Superior Court and the clerk also did an audit and confirmed there was no docket
number for the filed appeal.
On December 8 and December 9 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, made repeated calls to the
Lancaster County Clerk of Court with no answer. I also requested the clerk at Superior Court to
inquirer, however they instructed me to make the calls.
This is not an isolated case, as you are aware. I have had many problems in the past with the
Clerk of Courts, in fact Ryan Aument, former Clerk of Courts, had to enlist the services of Mr.
Frankhouser, Attorney from Underhill and Brubaker, to defend against similar complaints. You
have copies of the correspondence in other case numbers.
This act amounts to extortion and theft by deception of the $75.00 of real monies.
This act amounts to a Civil Rights Violation of Obstruction of Justice for not granting me my
Constitutional Right To Appeal.
SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR YOUR REVIEW.
Dated: December 9, 2016
_________________________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Revised: 06/01/2009
Page 2 of 37
Appellate Courts Docket Sheets
1 of 1
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which
can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act (18 Pa.C.S. Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
The webpage you are viewing is operated and maintained by Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System as a source of public information. The webpage
is not affiliated with any search system for public records provided by private organizations for which fees may be incurred. The ability to search for
and review information contained in these web docket sheets is a free public service.
Select a Docket Sheet Search Type from the dropdown (default search type is by Docket Number)
Search Type:
Enter the desired search criteria and click Search (available search criteria changes based upon the type selected above)
* Court Name:
and any combination of
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Attorney First Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed:
Click the Print Preview icon to display the report
Docket Number
Short Caption
through
Case Status Filing Date
1219 MDA 2016 Caterbone, S. v. Lancaster City Bureau of Police Active
Page 3 of 37
07/27/2016

12/7/2016 5:15 AM

Search Type:
* Court Name:
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed:
through
No Records Found

1 of 1
Page 4 of 37

12/7/2016 5:16 AM
1 of 1

Search Type:
* Court Name:
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed:
Docket Number
Short Caption
through
1461 MDA 2006 Caterbone, S. et al v. Southern Reg. Police et al Closed
08/30/2006
1462 MDA 2006 Caterbone, S. v. Dept. of Transportation
Closed
08/30/2006
1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Caterbone, S.
Closed
08/30/2006
950 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. v. Totaro, D. et al
Closed
05/24/2007
951 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. v. Totato, D. et al
Closed
05/24/2007
1103 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. v. Com of PA/Dept Trans
Closed
06/12/2007
125 MDA 2007 Com. v. Caterbone, S.
Closed
01/19/2007
Closed
03/09/2007
Closed
05/01/2007
1097 MDA 2007 Com v. Caterbone, S.

First Previous 1 2 Next Last
Closed
06/15/2007
Page 5 of 37

12/7/2016 5:17 AM
1 of 1

Search Type:
* Court Name:
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed:
Docket Number
Short Caption
through
1565 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. et al v. Lancaster General et al
Closed
09/10/2007
Closed
11/21/2007
Closed
11/21/2007
Closed
01/14/2008
234 MDA 2008 In Re: Petition for Review
Closed
01/24/2008
783 MDA 2010 In Re: S. Caterbone
Closed
05/12/2010
784 MDA 2010 In Re: S. Caterbone
Closed
05/12/2010
1915 MDA 2015 Caterbone, S. & Adv. Media Grp. v. Lanc. Police Closed
11/02/2015
1561 MDA 2015 Caterbone, S. v. Residents of Lancaster County Closed

First Previous 1 2 Next Last
09/16/2015
Page 6 of 37

12/7/2016 5:17 AM
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

CRIMINAL DIVISION CLERK OF COURT
___________________________________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
CASE NO. Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AND NOW, on this 28th day of October, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, appearing pro se,
do hereby file this NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA as per the
ORDER of October 5, 2016 and do file the attached APPLICATION FOR IN FORMA
PAUPERIS.
Attached is also a Money Order for the $75.00 filing fee as per your previous
instructions.
Dated October 28, 2016
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 NOTICE OF APPEALPage 1 of 23
Friday October 28, 2016
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
ISSUES TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL

1. Judicial Misconduct
2. Selective and Retaliatory Discrimination under the 1990 Disabilities Act
3. Not Considering the MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Docketed on September 30, 2016 as
seen in the Court Record
4. By Not Considering the Motion For Continuance in Advance the APPEALLANT was not given
the opportunity to attend the HEARING and was maliciously found GUILTY IN ABSTENTIA
as the APPEALLANT used his PaeDock Mobile App to check the Court Record Daily waiting
for a RULING on the MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE.
5. Using the Courts for Political Vendettas
6. Attempted Extortion of Real Monies
7. Libel and Slander
8. Collusion of COINTELPRO-LIKE Tactics with Law Enforcement
Date: October 28, 2016
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED

On August 3, 2016 the APPELLANT received a phone call from a Loan Representative of
Huntington Bank, Columbus, Ohio concerning the APPELLANT'S auto loan for his 2007 Honda CRV.
The APPELLANT as 11 phone calls back and forth up to and including yesterday, August 30, 2016.
In June of 2015 the APPELLANT borrowed some $12,000 for the auto, a 100,000 mile warranty
and GAP Insurance.
On December 8, 2015 the APPELLANT was rear ended in Carlisle,
Pennsylvania in a suspicious incident. The APPELLANT fixed all repairs for a nominal cost of $300
to a minimum degree noticeability. On May 7, 2016 the APPELLANT FINALLY received the payout
from NATIONWIDE insurance and accepted full liability, documented the Honda CRV as Totaled.
On May 10, 2016 three days later the APPEALLANT'S front end was demolished, again by a
suspicious incident causing the APPELLANT'S insurer to pay over $5,000 in repairs.
In August
Huntington Bank tried to convince the APPEALLANT that payment was due for July and August, yet
in July of 2016 there was not one communication from Huntington Bank. On or about August 18,
2016 the APPEALLANT gave the Huntington Bank Loan Officer a routing number and account
number to a checking account with over $9,000 in available cash to make a payment.
The
Huntington Bank Loan Officer refused to process the payment and instead, as usual KEPT
HARASSING the APPEALLANT. On Sunday, August 20, 2016 the APPEALLANT cleaned out the car
in
anticipation
of
repossession
and
REFUSED
ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS AND HARASSMENT.
FURTHER
NEGOTIONS
REGARDING
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 another
suspicious incident occurred and left the front end severely damaged. On Monday the
APPEALLANT drove the Honda CRV to a parking garage in Harrisburg, notified
Huntington Bank and took a train home to Lancaster. The APPEALLANT has a bike.
AFFIDAVIT THAT COMPLIES WITH RULE 24(A)(1)

In 2015 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas began a campaign of DENYING In
Forma Pauperis Applications, and demanding that current cases with legitimate In Forma Pauperis
Status be DENIED in an effort to again subvert the laws of due process and obstruction of justice.
The Superior Court had followed, as did the U.S. District Court in this case by Judge Diamond.
This was an outright effort to extort monies from the APPELLANT and in the long term make
service of the complaints cost prohibitive due to the fact that Pro Se Litigants with In Forma
Pauperis Status, by law, receive free service from the Lancaster County Sheriffs and the U.S.
Marshalls.
APPELLANT.
This tactic, in the end, would have effectively dismissed all legitimate claims of the
The Judges used the excuse of monies in bank accounts as the rationale for the
illegal tactic, however, attached are 5 cases of GRANTED In Forma Pauperis applications in both
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, and the United
States District Court with financial affidavits containing amounts of monies in bank accounts
exceeding $10,000.00, all prior to 2015.
This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the
complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to
support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements.
with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
These documents will also provide the Court
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059.
The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings,
however this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in
the government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back
to the days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC)
Executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons
under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating to U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that no medical reports
or physicians were reported in the entire application process and there was never a psychiatric
evaluation for the same said purposes.
I am receiving a net monthly benefit of $1330.00 and
have been since April of 2008 and was declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said
month that I reported that I became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other
related symptoms and illnesses.
If the Court would consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the APPELLANT as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The APPELLANT wil argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the APPELLANT In Forma Pauperis Status. The
APPELLANT has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad.
Therefore any
attempt to subject the APPELLANT to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following:
Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.
The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.

The prosecutorial misconduct the the APPELLANT has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the APPELLANT
from completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and
18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
The attached 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that
may be proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant
an inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of
facts formed for the purpose
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to
strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a

performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1

Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt
to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as
a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could
be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to
concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been
brought before the courts.
These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of
limitations has run out.
1References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December

2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct

PUBLIC
Public
Case
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
- Clerk
- Clerk
of Courts
of Courts
NOTICE
& Prothonot
& Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF APPEAL
Page
Page
Page
Page20
918
18
of
of
of
of
23
128
85
89
Monday
Friday October 28,
21,
17, 2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct

DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET

Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Date Filed: 07/07/2016
OTN:
Page 1 of 5
Initiation Date: 07/07/2016
Originating Docket No: MJ-02301-TR-0000861-2016
LOTN:
Initial Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert
Final Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert
Arresting Agency: East Hempfield Twp Police Dept
Arresting Officer: Keen, Christopher Michael
Complaint/Incident #: E 0007452-4
Case Local Number Type(s)
Case Local Number(s)
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
Status Date
10/05/2016
Processing Status
10/05/2016
Awaiting Sentencing
07/07/2016
Awaiting Original Papers
07/07/2016
Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Complaint Date:
05/10/2016
Sentenced/Penalty Imposed
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:
07/15/1958
City/State/Zip: Lancaster, PA 17603
Alias Name
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
Caterbone, Stanley Joseph
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Name
Defendant
Caterbone, Stanley J.
CHARGES
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
75 3322
Vehicle Turning Left
05/09/2016
OTN
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Credit For Time Served
Start Date
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
Guilty by Trial (Lower Court)
Lower Court Disposition

1 / Vehicle Turning Left
Albert, Scott E.
Defendant Was Present

06/10/2016
Guilty by Trial (Lower Court)
Not Final
S
75 3322
06/10/2016
Guilty
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only
be provided
by
State
Police.
Moreover
an
employer
who
does
Criminal
History
Record 15,
PUBLIC
Public
Case
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
- Clerk
- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
Courts
ofofCourts
of
NOTICE
D.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF
Prothonotary
APPEAL
Page
P
Page
Page
Page
Page
age 10
11
12
15
313
13
of
of
of
of
of
61
23
69
82
128
83
85
89 not comply with the provisions of the
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Friday
October
October
October
14,
16,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Page 2 of 5
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Credit For Time Served
Start Date
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
Summary Appeal Trial
10/05/2016
Final Disposition
Guilty
1 / Vehicle Turning Left

Totaro, Donald R.
75 3322
10/05/2016
No Further Penalty
COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Rep. Status:
Phone Number(s):
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
07/07/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Notice of Summary Appeal Filed

1
09/06/2016
SA Hearing Notice Sent

09/06/2016
First Class/Certified
Lancaster County District Attorney's

Office
Lancaster County District Attorney's

Office
Hand Delivered
09/06/2016
1
09/30/2016
Motion for a 30-Day Continuance

1
10/05/2016
Totaro, Donald R.
10/05/2016
Totaro, Donald R.
Guilty
2
Order - Sentence/Penalty Imposed
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by
State
Police.
Moreover
an
employer
who
does
Criminal
History
Record 15,
PUBLIC
Public
Case
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
- Clerk
- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
Courts
ofofCourts
of
NOTICE
D.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF
Prothonotary
APPEAL
Page
P
Page
Page
Page
Page
age 11
12
13
16
414
14
of
of
of
of
of
61
23
69
82
128
83
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Friday
October
October
October
14,
16,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
ENTRIES
Document Date
Page 3 of 5
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Filed By
10/13/2016
Pfursich, Jacquelyn E.
10/13/2016
Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster

County
DL-21S to be Prepared
2
Penalty Assessed
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by
State
Police.
Moreover
an
employer
who
does
Criminal
History
Record 15,
PUBLIC
Public
Case
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
- Clerk
- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
Courts
ofofCourts
of
NOTICE
D.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF
Prothonotary
APPEAL
Page
P
Page
Page
Page
Page
age 12
13
14
17
515
15
of
of
of
of
of
61
23
69
82
128
83
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Friday
October
October
October
14,
16,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page 4 of 5
Last Payment Date:

Total of Last Payment:

Assessment
Payments
Adjustments
Defendant
Non Monetary
Payments
Total
Costs/Fees
ATJ
CAT/MCARE/General Fund
$4.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$4.00
$45.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.00
$2.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.25
$27.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$27.50
Clerk of Court Auto Fee-Costs

6593AAB1211 (Lan)
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
Commonwealth Cost - HB627 (Act 167

of 1992)
$8.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.55
County Court Cost (Act 204 of 1976)
$21.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21.40
DA Administration Fee 6421AB130019021 (Lan)
$25.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.00
DA Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211

(Lancaster)
$10.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$10.00
Emergency Medical Services (Act 45 of

1985)
$10.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$10.00
JCPS
$21.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21.25
Judicial Computer Project
$8.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.00
Sheriff Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211

(Lancaster)
$2.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.00
State Court Costs (Act 204 of 1976)
$8.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.55
Hearing Costs
$8.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.00
Prosecution Cost - 6411AB1211

(Lancaster)
$6.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$6.68
$213.18
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$213.18
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License

Fund)
$12.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$12.50
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License

Fund)
$12.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$12.50
Fines Totals:
$25.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.00
Grand Totals:
$238.18
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$238.18
CJES
Clerk Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211
(Lancaster)
Costs/Fees Totals:
Fines
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by
State
Police.
Moreover
an
employer
who
does
Criminal
History
Record 15,
PUBLIC
Public
Case
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
- Clerk
- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
Courts
ofofCourts
of
NOTICE
D.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF
Prothonotary
APPEAL
Page
P
Page
Page
Page
Page
age 13
14
15
18
616
16
of
of
of
of
of
61
23
69
82
128
83
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Friday
October
October
October
14,
16,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
Page 5 of 5
** - Indicates assessment is subrogated
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by
State
Police.
Moreover
an
employer
who
does
Criminal
History
Record 15,
PUBLIC
Public
Case
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
- Clerk
- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
Courts
ofofCourts
of
NOTICE
D.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF
Prothonotary
APPEAL
Page
P
Page
Page
Page
Page
age 14
15
16
19
717
17
of
of
of
of
of
61
23
69
82
128
83
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Friday
October
October
October
14,
16,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016

PUBLIC
Public
Case
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
- Clerk
- Clerk
of Courts
of Courts
NOTICE
& Prothonot
& Prothonot
OF APPEAL
P
Page
Page
age 15
23
21of
of
of23
128
89
Friday October 28,

21, 2016

PUBLIC
Public
Case
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
- Clerk
- Clerk
of Courts
of Courts
NOTICE
& Prothonot
& Prothonot
OF APPEAL
P
Page
Page
age 16
24
22of
of
of23
128
89
Friday October 28,

21, 2016

PUBLIC
Public
Case
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
- Clerk
- Clerk
of Courts
of Courts
NOTICE
& Prothonot
& Prothonot
OF APPEAL
P
Page
Page
age 17
25
23of
of
of23
128
89
Friday October 28,

21, 2016

PUBLIC
Public
Case
No.
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
- Clerk
- Clerk
of Courts
of Courts
NOTICE
& Prothonot
& Prothonot
OF APPEAL
P
Page
Page
age 18
22
20of
of
of23
128
89
Friday October 28,

21, 2016
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Lancaster
XXXXXXXXXX
July 7, 2016
IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

Page 1 of 5
PUBLIC
Public
IN
PUBLIC
FORMA
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
PAUPERIS
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
MDJ
APPLICATION
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
ofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page57
36
44
66
58
60
1
64of
of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89
October 28, 2016

Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Lancaster

Page 2 of 5
PUBLIC
Public
IN
PUBLIC
FORMA
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
PAUPERIS
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
MDJ
APPLICATION
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
ofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page58
37
45
67
59
61
2
65of
of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89

Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct

Page 3 of 5
PUBLIC
Public
IN
PUBLIC
FORMA
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
PAUPERIS
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
MDJ
APPLICATION
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
ofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page59
38
46
68
60
62
3
66of
of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89

Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
REPOSESSED
See Attached Docket

Page 4 of 5
PUBLIC
Public
IN
PUBLIC
FORMA
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
PAUPERIS
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
MDJ
APPLICATION
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
ofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page60
39
47
69
61
63
4
67of
of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89

Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
CivilCivil
Civil
Rights
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
October 28, 2016
XXXXXXXXX

Page 5 of 5
PUBLIC
Public
IN
PUBLIC
FORMA
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
PAUPERIS
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
MDJ
APPLICATION
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
ofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page61
40
48
70
62
64
5
68of
of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89

Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
28,
21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
2016

Judicial Conduct Board LETTER Re COMPLAINT No. 2016-788 For JUDGE ASHWORTH and 2016-789 For JUDGE REINAKER Dated January 10, 2017

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Judicial Conduct Board LETTER Re COMPLAINT No. 2016-788 For JUDGE ASHWORTH and 2016-789 For JUDGE REINAKER Dated January 10, 2017

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

COMMONWEALTH OF

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD

CONFIDENTIAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION

Judicial Officers Information:

Type of Judicial Officer:

Case Information: (If misconduct allegations relate to Court Proceedings.)

Case Has Been Appealed

Case Docket Number: CI-16-08472

Case Name: CATERBONE v. Lancaster General

Please explain your complaint on the reverse of this form.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM

SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR YOUR REVIEW.

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth

Monday December 12, 2016

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM

PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY

PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES

COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, IN PRO SE

MOTION FOR A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE, FILED

EXHIBIT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE IN PRO SE

CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED

December 09, 2016

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth

Monday December 12, 2016

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY

1250 Fremont Street

CIVIL ACTION LAW

Preliminary Emergency Injunction for EMERGENCY Relief:

1250 Fremont Street

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

1250 Fremont Street

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth

Monday December 12, 2016

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth

Monday December 12, 2016

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth

Monday December 12, 2016

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth

Monday December 12, 2016

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, FURTHERENCE OF TORTURE PROGRAM

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT - Judge David Ashworth

Monday December 12, 2016

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

Preliminary Emergency Injunction for EMERGENCY Relief:

1250 Fremont Street

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

ACTIVE COURT CASES FOR STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGANT

5. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462

7. Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-MD-1219 Preliminary Emergency

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS,

patient since 2005.

Upon arrival for the physical to

Most of the prescriptions were refiled by a phone call.