Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
In the case of temporary groups, like project team, task force, or any other such group,
which have a limited task at hand, also have a fifth stage, This is known as adjourning.
The group decides to disband. Some members may feel happy over the performance, and
some may be unhappy over the stoppage of meeting with group members. Adjourning may
also be referred to as mourning, i.e. mourning the adjournment of the group.
The readers must note that the four stages of group development mentioned above for
permanent groups are merely suggestive. In reality, several stages may go on
simultaneously.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
group might lead a work group, the formally designated leader (appointed by
management) has authority that others in the group don't have.
Organizational Culture: Every organization has an unwritten culture that defines
standards of acceptable and unacceptable behavior for employees. Members of work
groups have to accept the standards implied in the organization's dominant culture if
they are to remain in good standing.
Formal Regulations: Organizations create rules, procedures, policies and other forms
of regulations to standardize employee behavior. The more formal regulations that
the organization imposes on all its employees, the more the behavior of work group
members are consistent and predictable.
Organizational Resources: When organizations have limited resources, so do their
work groups. What a group actually accomplishes is, to a large degree, determined
by what it is capable of accomplishing. The presence or absence of resources such as
money, time, raw materials and equipment which are allocated to the group by the
organization has a large bearing on the group's behavior.
Physical Work Setting: The physical work setting imposed on the group by eternal
parties has an important bearing on work group behavior. They physical setting
creates both barriers and opportunities for work group interaction. Workers will not be
able to waste time if their superiors work close to them.
Reward System: Since work groups are part of the larger organizational system,
group members will be influenced by how the organization evaluates performance
and what behaviors are rewarded.
Group Cohesiveness:
1. Cohesiveness refers to the bonding of group members or unity, feelings of attraction
for each other and desire to remain part of the group.
2. Many factors influence the amount of group cohesiveness agreement on group
goals, frequency of interaction, personal attractiveness, inter-group competition,
favorable evaluation, etc.
3. The more difficult it is to obtain group membership the more cohesive the group will
be.
4. Groups also tend to become cohesive when they are in intense competition with
other groups or face a serious external threat to survival. Smaller groups and those
who spend considerable time together also tend to be more cohesive.
5. Cohesiveness in work groups has many positive effects, including worker satisfaction,
low turnover and absenteeism, and higher productivity.
6. However, highly cohesive groups may be detrimental to organizational performance
if their goals are misaligned with organizational goals.
7. Highly cohesive groups may also be more vulnerable to groupthink.
8. Groupthink occurs when members of a group exert pressure on each other to come to
a consensus in decision making.
9. Groupthink results in careless judgments, unrealistic appraisals of alternative courses
of action, and a lack of reality testing.
10. Evidence suggests that groups typically outperform individuals when the tasks
involved require a variety of skills, experience, and decision making.
11. Groups are often more flexible and can quickly assemble, achieve goals, and disband
or move on to another set of objectives.
12. Many organizations have found that groups have many motivational aspects as well.
13. Group members are more likely to participate in decision-making and problemsolving activities leading to empowerment and increased productivity.
14. Groups complete most of the work in an organization; thus, the effectiveness of the
organization is limited by the effectiveness of its groups.
Avoidance
Accommodation
Forcing
Compromise
Collaboration
Collaboration:
The team should understand group processes and work effectively and cooperatively with
other members of the team. For it they have to understand the roles and responsibilities of
team members, team leaders, and team recorders.
It's called consensus building, and it is needed to help the team determine the relative
importance of topics, issues or problems. Consensus is a technique that allows everyone on
the team to equally play an active role in determining the group's final decision.
Leadership Functions:
Following are the important functions of a leader:
1. Setting Goals:
1. A leader is expected to perform creative function of laying out goals and
policies to persuade the subordinates to work with zeal and confidence.
2. Organizing:
1. The second function of a leader is to create and shape the organization on
scientific lines by assigning roles appropriate to individual abilities with the
view to make its various components to operate sensitively towards the
achievement of enterprise goals.
3. Initiating Action:
1. The next function of a leader is to take the initiative in all matters of interest
to the group. He should not depend upon others for decision and judgement.
He should float new ideas and his decisions should reflect original thinking.
4. Co-Ordination:
1. A leader has to reconcile the interests of the individual members of the group
with that of the organization. He has to ensure voluntary co-operation from
the group in realizing the common objectives.
5. Direction and Motivation:
1. It is the primary function of a leader to guide and direct his group and
motivate people to do their best in the achievement of desired goals. He
should build up confidence and zeal in the work group.
6. Link between Management and Workers:
1. A leader works as a necessary link between the management and the
workers. He interprets the policies and programs of the management to this
subordinate and represent the subordinates interests before the
management. He can prove effective only when he can act as the true
guardian of the interests of the subordinates.
Leadership Styles or Types of Leaders:
The term leadership style, refers to the consistent behavior pattern of a leader as perceived
by people around him. Every leader develops a pattern in the way he handles his
subordinates or followers in various situations. The leadership style is the result of the
philosophy, personality and experience of the leader. It also depends upon the types of
followers and the conditions prevailing in an organization.
I. Leadership Style Based on Attitude and Behavior:
According to their attitude and behavior patterns leaders are classified as under:
1.
2.
3.
4.
3. Task Management:
Efficiency in operations result from arranging conditions for work in such a way, that human
elements interfere to a minimum degree. As shown in the grid at 9.1, the leaders with high
concern for production fall under this style. Their concern for people, however, is minimum.
4. Team Management:
Work accomplishment is from committed people, interdependence through a common
stake in organization purpose leads to relationships of trust and respect. As shown in the
grid at 9.9, the leaders having high concern for production as well as people fall under this
style.
5. Middle of the Road:
Adequate organization performance is possible through balancing the necessity to get out
work while maintaining morale of people at a satisfactory level. This has been shown in the
grid at 5.5. The leaders of this style have medium concern for both people and production
and try to maintain a balance in the two.
The managerial grid implies that the most desirable leader behavior is team management
(9.9) in which the leader has high concern for production as well as people. The managerial
grid is useful for identifying various combinations of leadership styles. But it is unable to
point out the factors which lead the manager to such a style.
IV. Leadership Style Based on Decision Making:
Rensis Likert was the Director of Michigan Institute of Social Research, U.S.A. He conducted
extensive research for fourteen years with the help of 40 researchers in the field of
leadership. His famous writings include: New Patterns of Management published in 1961
and Human Organization published in 1967.
Likert treats the organization as a complex system based on the principle of supporting
relationships, in which decision-making, leadership, motivation, communication and control
move together. He was of the view that these variables are measurable and could be related
to production and profit over time. He recognized the organization as a social system made
up of interrelated work groups having group loyalties. He was also of the view that
traditional job oriented supervision was the cause of low productivity and low morale. He
suggested participating management in the field of decision-making.
He classified leadership styles into four categories:
Exploitative Autocratic:
In this style, there is no participation of workers because these leaders have no
confidence and trust in subordinates.
Benevolent Autocratic:
There is no proper confidence in subordinates and the relationship is that of a master
and servant.
Participative:
The subordinates are allowed to participate in decisions involving their lives. Leader
does not have full confidence in them.
Democratic:
In this style the confidence and trust in subordinates is full and they meaningfully
participate in decision-making. Likert has used a continuum of four managerial
systems, i.e., from system 1 to system 4. Table given below shows some of the main
characteristics of these systems.