Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Desalination
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/desal
H I G H L I G H T S
Formation mechanism of bedding scale from produced water is hypothesized and proved.
Anti-corrosion, crude oil dispersing and Ca2 + chelation are essential for scale inhibition.
The compound (PBTCA, HEDP and ATMP) achieves desired effect of scale inhibition.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 April 2014
Received in revised form 1 August 2014
Accepted 2 August 2014
Available online 15 August 2014
Keywords:
Produced-water
Reuse
Scale buildup
Compound inhibitor
Optimization
a b s t r a c t
Inhibition of scale buildup and optimization of the selected compound inhibitor were investigated during the
recycling and reuse of oileld produced-water. Particular attentions were paid to the factors of scale inhibition,
and the changes of scale phase composition and morphology. The results showed that the addition of Zn2+
ions can effectively inhibit the process of corrosion, and then reduce scale growth. A dispersing agent was required to buffer against the adhesion of crude oil with the precipitates. The compound inhibitor (ratio of
PBTCA, HEDP and ATMP, 2:2:1) achieved a higher efciency of scale inhibition (97.34%) than any of the inhibitors
individually. Moreover, structural anomalies of the crystals also revealed signicant differences in the presence
and absence of the compound inhibitor. The results proved that the pipelines rst corrode, then, mechanical impurities, residual petroleum hydrocarbons and calcium scale gradually attach to the corrosion point to form a dirt
scale layer. After n periods, a bedding black-and-white scale layer forms. During the eld trial, it was found that
dosing the compound inhibitor at 70 ppm results in a 92.46% inhibition efciency (IEs) at 85 C. Therefore, the
compound inhibitor could be applied to prevent the buildup of scale during produced-water reuse.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Oileld produced-water is co-produced during oil extraction, and is
considered to be the largest stream of waste, in terms of volume generated during the processes of petroleum exploration and production. To
reduce the excessive consumption of clean water resources and protect
the water environment, it is necessary to nd an effective way to reuse
these wastewaters, especially in water-scarcity regions. During the process of high pour-point crude oil or heavy oil exploitation, producedwater can be used to transport crude oil after heating in the petroleum
pipeline [1]. The benets of recycling and reusing produced-water include not only a saving of vast quantities of fresh water, but also an absolute recovery of the thermal energy. However, in contrast to fresh
water, produced-water contains abundant organic substrates and inorganic ions, despite processing in the form of oatation and ltration
Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +86 024 83970449.
E-mail address: shuhaiguo@iae.ac.cn (S. Guo).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.08.003
0011-9164/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
214
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of scale formation in a pipeline during the recycling and reuse of high pour-point oil produced-water.
Table 1
Analysis results of produced-water samples.
Parameter
Concentration (mg/L)
Mg2+
HCO
3
SO2
4
Ca2+
Cl
Oil
Total alkalinity
Total mineralization
Total dissolved solids
Total residue
2.31
23.04
47.19
94.37
1159.43
28.53
2014
2349
2559
2825
A eld trial test was constructed at the 5th Metering Station of the
Shenyang Production Plant, Liaohe Oileld, China, in which the optimum compound inhibitor was used in the oileld produced-water
recycling system. A control pipe and a treated pipe were established
to compare the efciencies of the inhibitors. After a 90-day test, the control pipes and the treated pipes were treated according to the steel specimen treatment process. The corrosion rate (R) and the corrosion
inhibition efciency (IEc%) were calculated using Eqs. (2) and (3). And
the scale inhibition efciency (IEs%) was calculated using Eq. (1).
Table 2
Analysis results of scale samples.
Parameter
wt.%
Moisture content
Acid non-soluble substance
Fe
Crude oil
Loss on ignition
CaO
0.78
0.90
1.32
4.71
35.60
50.82
a
IEs % G0 G=G0 100
215
where G0 is the scale weight of the control sample, and G is the scale
weight of the treated sample.
The weight loss measurement was tested to verify anti-corrosion
performance of the agents in the static jar tests. It was performed with
carbon steel specimens for 24 h at 85 C. Prior to all measurements,
the steel samples were washed thoroughly with double-distilled
water, degreased with ethanol and acetone, then dried at room temperature and accurately weighed. After the test, the steel samples were
carefully washed in double-distilled water, dried and weighed again.
The corrosion rate (R) and the corrosion inhibition efciency (IEc%)
were calculated using Eqs. (2) and (3):
R W=At
where W is the weight loss, is the density of carbon steel, A is the total
area, t is the immersion time, R0 and R are the values of the corrosion
rate, respectively.
A
a
B
Fig. 2. Carbon steel coupons in the presence and absence of Zn2+: (A), coupons after the
24-h jar test; (B), coupons cleaned by hydrochloric acid. In each panel, coupon (a) is the
blank test,(b) is test 1, and (c) is test 2.
80
70
40
80
120
160
200
240
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
IEs
30
20
Compound inhibitor
PBTCA
HEDP
ATMP
90
60
100
216
10
20
30
40
50
IEc
60
70
80
2+
Ratio of Zn (%)
Fig. 3. Efciencies of scale and corrosion inhibition with different ratios of Zn2+ to compound agents (compound inhibitor at 50 mg/L).
95
20 mg/L
40 mg/L
60 mg/L
80 mg/L
100 mg/L
90
85
10
217
Fig. 6. Inuence of inhibitors concentration on scale inhibition performance (the composition and constituents of compound inhibitor: PBTCA:HEDP:ATMP, 2:2:1; Zn2+, 30%
ratio of compound inhibitor; OP-15, 4 mg/L).
Fig. 7. SEM images of scale: (A) blank and (B) in the presence of compound inhibitor.
3.1.4. Comparison of SEM and XRD results in the presence and absence of
compound inhibitor
Panels of Fig. 7A and B are SEM images of the scale crystals deposited
on the stainless steel surface. It can be seen that, in the absence of
inhibitor, all of the crystal growth was normal, exhibiting regular
rhombohedrum shapes. The crystal-shaped blocks are typical of calcite
formation [34]. The blank test showed that only one homogeneous
layer of cubic crystals was smaller than 0.1 m. After treatment with
the inhibitor, the edges of scale crystals disappeared and were more
spherical in shape. This is because the inhibitor adsorbed onto the active
growth sites of the crystal surfaces and inhibited the regular outgrowth
of scale crystals during the crystal growth process. Also, the modication of crystal morphology could affect the adherence of CaCO3 on the
stainless steel surface. The morphological study of the scale crystals
Table 3
Corrosion rate and corrosion inhibition efciency of inhibitors.
Inhibitor
IEc (%)
R (mm/a)
Blank
Compound inhibitor
PBTCA
HEDP
ATMP
97.95
88.32
85.59
87.67
1.84
0.02
0.21
0.26
0.23
Fig. 8. XRD images of scale: (A) blank and (B) in the presence of compound inhibitor.
218
Acknowledgment
Table 4
Corrosion rate, scale and corrosion inhibition efciency in the oileld.
Pipe
IEs (%)
IEc (%)
R (mm/a)
Control pipe 1#
Treated pipe 1#
92.46
95.12
1.019
0.037
[1] R. Martnez-Palou, M. Mosqueira, B. Zapata-Rendn, E. Mar-Jurez, C. BernalHuicochea, J. Clavel-Lpez, J. Aburto, Transportation of heavy and extra-heavy
crude oil by pipeline: a review, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 75 (2011) 274282.
[2] J.M. Younker, M.E. Walsh, Bench-scale investigation of an integrated adsorption
coagulationdissolved air otation process for produced water treatment, J. Environ.
Chem. Eng. (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.11.009.
[3] E.S. Mona, R. Mahmoud, A.M. Thanaa, Analysis of oileld waters by ion chromatography to determine the composition of scale deposition, Desalination 249 (2009)
748756.
[4] X.Y. Liu, J.G. Li, Q.Y. Zhu, J.L. Feng, Y.L. Li, J.X. Sun, The analysis and prediction of scale
accumulation for water-injection pipelines in the Daqing Oileld, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
66 (2009) 161164.
[5] R. Touir, N. Dkhireche, M. Ebn Touhami, M. Lakhrissi, B. Lakhrissi, M. Sfaira, Corrosion and scale processes and their inhibition in simulated cooling water systems
by monosaccharides derivatives part I: EIS study, Desalination 249 (2009) 922928.
[6] M.M. Jordan, C.J. Graff, K.N. Cooper, Deployment of a scale squeeze enhancer and oilsoluble scale inhibitor to avoid oil production loses in low water-cut well, SPE Prod.
Facil. 16 (2001) 267276.
[7] M.B. Tomson, G. Fu, M.A. Watson, A.T. Kan, Mechanisms of mineral scale inhibition,
SPE Prod. Facil. 18 (2003) 192199.
[8] B. Senthilmurugan, B. Ghosh, S.S. Kundu, M. Haroun, B. Kameshwari, Maleic acid
based scale inhibitors for calcium sulfate scale inhibition in high temperature application, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 75 (2010) 189195.
[9] M. Amiri, J. Moghadasi, The effect of temperature on calcium carbonate scale formation in Iranian Oil Reservoirs using OLI ScaleChem Software, Petrol. Sci. Technol. 30
(2012) 453466.
[10] S.J. Dyer, G.M. Graham, The effect of temperature and pressure on oileld scale formation, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 35 (2002) 95107.
[11] X.K. Xing, C.F. Ma, Y.C. Chen, Mechanism of calcium carbonate scale deposition
under subcooled ow boiling conditions, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 13 (2005) 464470.
[12] T. Kumar, S. Vishwanatham, S.S. Kundu, A laboratory study on pteroyl-L-glutamic
acid as a scale prevention inhibitor of calcium carbonate in aqueous solution of synthetic produced water, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 71 (2010) 17.
[13] B. Senthilmurugan, B. Ghosh, S. Sanker, High performance maleic acid based oil well
scale inhibitorsdevelopment and comparative evaluation, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 17
(2011) 415420.
[14] Y.A. Roomi, K.F. Hussein, M.R. Riazi, Inhibition efciencies of synthesized anhydride
based polymers as scale control additives in petroleum production, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
81 (2012) 151160.
[15] C. Garcia, G. Courbin, F. Ropital, C. Fiaud, Study of the scale inhibition by HEDP in a
channel ow cell using a quartz crystal microbalance, Electrochim. Acta 46 (2001)
973985.
[16] Y.M. Tang, W.Z. Yang, X.S. Yin, Y. Liu, P.W. Yin, J.T. Wang, Investigation of CaCO3 scale
inhibition by PAA, ATMP and PAPEMP, Desalination 228 (2008) 5560.
[17] National development and reform commission of PR China standard test method,
Practice for analysis of oileld waters. Item no. SY/T 5523-2006, 2006. (in Chinese).
[18] Z.H. Wang, The research on scale inhibitor of circular injection sewage in oileld,
Northeast Petroleum University, 2005. (in Chinese).
[19] K.D. Demadis, S.D. Katarachia, M. Koutmos, Crystal growth and characterization of
zinc-(amino-tris-(methylenephosphonate)) organicinorganic hybrid networks and
their inhibiting effect on metallic corrosion, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 8 (2005) 254258.
[20] J.Y. Hu, D.B. Huang, G.L. Song, X.P. Guo, The synergistic inhibition effect of organic
silicate and inorganic Zn salt on corrosion of Mg10Gd3Y magnesium alloy, Corros.
Sci. 53 (2011) 40934101.
[21] C.M. Anbarasi, S. Rajendran, Investigation of the inhibitive effect of octanesulfonic
acidzinc ion system on corrosion of carbon steel, Chem. Eng. Commun. 199
(2012) 15961609.
[22] H. Amar, J. Benzakour, A. Derja, D. Villemin, B. Moreau, T. Braisaz, A. Tounsi,
Synergistic corrosion inhibition study of Armco iron in sodium chloride by
piperdin-l-yl-phosphonic acid-Zn2+ system, Corros. Sci. 50 (2008) 124130.
[23] T. Gu, P.C. Su, X.Y. Liu, J.C. Zou, X.Y. Zhang, Y. Hu, A composite inhibitor used in
oileld: MA-AMPS and imidazoline, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 102 (2013) 4146.
[24] G.L. Jing, T. Shan, X.X. Li, H.Y. Wang, The analysis of scaling mechanism for waterinjection pipe columns in the Daqing Oileld, Arab. J. Chem. (2013), http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.02.023.
[25] S.B. Deng, G. Yu, Z.X. Chen, D. Wu, F.J. Xia, N. Jiang, Characterization of suspended
solids in produced water in Daqing oileld, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng.
Asp. 332 (2009) 6369.
[26] F. Zhang, Y.H. She, H.M. Li, X.T. Zhang, F.C. Shu, Z.L. Wang, L.J. Yu, D.J. Hou, Impact of
an indigenous microbial enhanced oil recovery eld trial on microbial community
structure in a high pour-point oil reservoir, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 95 (2012)
811821.
[27] H.H. Qin, C.T. Li, H. Liu, W. Zhang, G.M. Zeng, H.L. Gao, H.L. Li, Comparison of scaleinhibiting properties of polyaspartic acid, polyacrylic acid and 2-phosphonobutane1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid, China Environ. Sci. 30 (2010) 14661472 (in chinese).
219
[33] L.N. Plummer, E. Busenberg, The solubilities of calcite, aragonite and vaterite in
CO2H2O solutions between 0 and 90 C and an evaluation of the aqueous model
for the system CaCO3CO2H2O, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46 (1982) 10111040.
[34] B. Ghosh, B. Senthilmurugan, Low molecular weight co-polymer for calcium scale
inhibition at high temperature, The SPE International Symposium on Oileld Chemistry, Woodlands, Texas, USA, SPE 121784, 2009.
[35] N.P. Tung, N.T.P. Phong, B.Q.K. Long, N.H. Duy, Scale inhibitors for co-deposited calcium sulfate and calcium carbonate in squeeze process in white tiger oileld. SPE
2004, 87467.
[36] J.S. Baker, S.J. Judd, S.A. Parsons, Antiscale magnetic pretreatment of reverse osmosis
feedwater, Desalination 110 (1997) 151165.
[37] T. Hodgkiess, K.H. Al-Omari, N. Bontems, B. Lesiak, Acid cleaning of thermal desalination plant: do we need to use corrosion inhibitors? Desalination 183 (2005)
209216.