Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
April
p 14,, 2009
Yoshitaka USHIO
The Energy Conservation Center
1
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction
PROMEEC Project for ASEAN Countries
EE&C Benchmark for Buildings
Energy Management Tool for Buildings in Process
Benchmarking
Conclusion
7,000
oil equivalentmillion t.
Asia
Annual % in
increase
6,000
04-30
5 000
5,000
4,000
World
1.7%
Asia
2.8%
NA
1 0%
1.0%
North America
3,000
OECD EU
2,000
Non OECD EU
Latin America
Middle East
Africa
Oceania
1,000
0
1971
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
ASIA
2004
3.1billion toe.
2030
1 4billion toe
1.4
2030
7000
oil
equivalent million tone
6000
5000
16%
4000
3000
12%
S Korea
Japan
9%
China
46%
17%
1000
45%
2030
6%
7%
2000
INDIA
2004
India
0
1971
1980
1990
2004
2010
2020
2030
Primary
energy supply per GDP unit of each country (2005)
Index
(Japan=1.0)
1.6
1.5
Approx. 37%
improvemen
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
2005
Fiscal
Year
2000
3.0
1995
3.2
1990
86
8.6
6.0
1985
3.1
1980
2.4
1975
2.0
1970
1.9
1965
1.0
0.8
7.9
6.0
0.9
17.4
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10 0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
1.7
7
2
5
5
1981)
PROMEEC Project
Achievement & Key Direction
ECCJ
Technology &
Experience of Japan
Successful Completion
Learning through
thro gh Assistance
Phase-1 : Completed (FY 2000- 2004)
Transfer of Technology /Experience
Japanese
Expertise
Creative Activities
For Localization
To Pha
T
ase-3
Evaluation to Find
W Forward
Way
F
d !!
2000--2008 Activity
2000
Phase 1
2002, 2003 :
(1) Energy Audit on a basis of OJT
(2) Workshops
- Introduction of technologies and experience for EE&C realized in Japanese
buildings
- Explanation and discussion of result of energy audits
Phase 2
PROMEEC-Building
Seminar/Workshop
p in Malaysia
y Kuala
(Nov
( Lumpur 13,
, 2008))
MALAYSIA
8.30
9.00
9.00
9.10
Registration
Welcome Remarks by the Host Country
9.10
9.20
Opening Statement
Mr. Nguyen Manh Hung
9.20
9.30
Opening Statement
Mr. Yoshitaka Ushio
9.30
10.00
10.00
10.20
10.20
10.40
11.10
11.30
11.30
12.00
12.00
12.30
12.30
13.30
13.30
14.00
14.00
14.30
14.30
15.00
15.00
15.15
15.45
15.15
15.45
15.50
15.50
16.10
16.10
16.20
16:20
16:35
16.35
16.45
16.45
17:00
10.40
11.10
ACE
Q & A Session
Closing Remarks:
Mr Ahmad Zairin Ismail,
Acting Chief Executive Officer, Pusat Tenaga Malaysia
10
Seminar-Workshop
N
Number
b off th
the Participants
P ti i
t in
i Phase
Ph
2
Country
IN
CA
TH
PH
MM
ML
LP
VN
BR
PH
VN
Y
Year
(FY)
2004
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
Number of Participants
81
60
45
88
69
138
64
47
60
60
85
No. of Presentation by
H tC
Host
Countries
ti
No. of Presentation by
Other ASEAN
No. of Presentation by
ECCJ & ACE
Country
CA
IN
SN
PH
LP
BR
ML
YearFY
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2008
2008
Number of Participants
60
66
22
64
36
54
118
No. of Presentation by
Host Countries
No. of Presentation by
Other ASEAN
No. of Presentation by
ECCJ & ACE
1217
for last 5 years
11
12
13
ML
2006
LP
VN
BR
PH
VN
FS-1
FS-2
EA-1
EA=1
EA-2
EA-1
FS-1
FS-1
EA-2
EA-1
EA-2
EA-1
EA-2
Host
Country
y
15
15
13
10
16
20
11
10
15
14
ECCJ &
ACE
2008
Cambodia
Indonesia
Philippines
Lao PDR
Brunei
Malaysia
EA-1
EA-2
EA-1
EA-2
EA
FS
EA
FS
EA
FS
EA
FS
Host
Country
10
14
10
13
10
11
12
10
ECCJ &
ACE
M
Many
trainees
t i
participated
ti i t d in
i all
ll the
th OJT activities.
ti iti
14
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
HT-1
Energy Audit
OF-1
OF 1
OF-1
Phase
OF 1
OF-1
OF-1
HT-1
HT-1, OF-1
HT-1
HT-1
Energy Audit
HT-1
Follow-up
HT-1
OF-1
HT-1
OF-1
OF-1
HT-2
Energy Audit
OF-1
OF-1
HT-1
Follow-up
HT-1
OF-1, HT-1
Energy Audit
OF-1
Follow-up
HT-1
OF-2
Phase
MK-1, HS-1
Site visit
2007
Energy Audit
2008
Energy Audit
SC-1
OF-1
OF-1
OF-1
Follow-up
p
OF-1
HT-1
OF-1
OF-1
HT 1 MK
HT-1,
MK-1
1 MK-1,
MK 1 HS
HS-1
1
Follow-up
Note 1: Abbreviation : OF: Office, HT: Hotel, HS: Hospital, MK: Market
Note 2: Number of the buildings which have been audited before: total 31
(14 Offices, 11 Hotels, 2 Hospital, 3 Markets and one School)
15
2. Energy
Consumption
3. Energy
Intensity (GFAPFA)
Average
7,111m2
to
199,928m2
48,637m2
829MWh
to
56 391MWh
56,391MWh
8,192MWh
87.5kWh/m2/yr
to
366.5kWh/m2/yr
195.8kWh/
m2.yr
1. Scale of the
buildings
(GFA)
Range
10
8
6
4
2
0
<100 150 200 250 300 350
200 250 300 3150
16
y = 0.2391x - 775.18
2
R = 0.8839
20,000
15,000
Hotel
Office
(Hotel)
(Office)
y = 0.1383x + 1495.8
2
R = 0.6856
10,000
5,000
0
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
Office
Number of Buildings
GFL
Energy
Intensity
(GFL-PFL)
200,000
Hotel
14
11
Range
2 663m2 - 156,249m2
2,663m2
156 249m2
7 111m2 40,000m2
7,111m2
40 000m2
Average
57,857m2
25,356m2
Range
87.5kWh/m2/yr
366 5kWh/m2/yr
366.5kWh/m2/yr
Average
178.6kWh/m2/yr
190.0kWh/m2/yr
17
Others
19%
Lighting
Li
hti &
outlets
30%
13
ASEAN
Offices
Japan (Reference)
Heat
Source
38%
Heat
Handling
13%
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Others
15%
Heat Source
Heat Handling
Lighting &
outlets
Others
Lighting &
outlets
42%
Heat
Handling
12%
177
68
Heat
Source
31%
186
ASEAN
Japan
79
58
53
33 27
22 22
H
Heat
Source
S
H
Heat
Handling
H dli
Lighting
Li
hi &
outlets
Oh
Others
BEI
EEI
18
Japan (Reference)
H
Heat
Source
S
18%
18%
Heat Handling
36%
38%
Hot water &
St
Steam
Lighting &
outlets
Others
16%
8%
20%
23%
12%
11%
350
297
7 Hotels
kWh/m2/yr
300
250
200
200
150
100
ASEAN
Japan
107
77
68
39 33
50
17
36
35
32
53
0
Heat
Source
Heat
Hot water Lighting &
Handling & Steam outlets
Others
BEI
EEI
19
Energy
gy Audit :Recommendations for Improvement
p
Item
Results
Recommendation Items
1. Number of the
recommendation items
2-8
20%
2 Air conditioning
2.
42%
40MWh
4,207MWh
Average: 647MWh
1% - 27%
Average: 9.2%
13%
11%
8%
8%
2%
3. Lighting
9%
5%
5. Transformer
3%
6. Co-generation system
14%
7. Others
7%
100%
20
Example 1 : Recommendations
C li T
Cooling
Tower
Office Building with shopping mall.
EEI=366.5kWh/m2/yr
COWT: In 36 Out 40
21
Example 1 :Recommendations
Cooling water temperature and the efficiency of the chiller
Cooling water temperature in the cooling tower
20
32
24
36
28
10%
120
P ow er Inpu
ut (%)
100
80
CT-1
CT-2
CT-3
Cooling water in
37
3637
37
Cooling water
out
34
3637
32
33
60
40
20
Temperature
0
20%
40%
60%
80%
RH
(DB)
100%
Temperature
WB)
Sep 2 11:50
33 4
33.4
50%
25 5
25.5
Sep 2 12:00
32.4
61%
25.8
22
Office Building
EEI=232.1kWh/m2/yr
AHU
3rdFL
Outdoor air intake
damper Close
2ndFL
1stFL
Return air
Supply air
Office Rm
Under floor Plenum
GFL
Supply air diffuser
23
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
M
Measurement
poit
i N
No.
North
South
117(18)
15(16)
13(14)
20.7
18
19.8
16 17.7
18
Av
e.
16
17
14
15
13
12
11
9
10
Temperat
ure(
20.6
18.6
22
Tem
mperature(
Room Temp.
21.9
30
Temperat
ure(
21.9 18.6
20 23.4
10
22.8
19.8
0
1(2)
20 6
20.6
30
North
South
2(3)
( )
3(4)
Temperatu
re(
20
22.4
10
19.6
0
(8)
21.1
North
South
9(10)
11(12)
24
PROMEEC-Building
Follow up Survey
Follow-up
A udit
done
Follow up done
Im provem ent
(%)
T hailand
O ffice
2000
2004
27.0
C am bbodi
dia
H otel
l
2001
2004
24 0
24.
P hilippines
O ffice
2001
2004
11.0
V ietnam
H otel
2002
2005
4.0
M yanm ar
O ffice
2002
2005
2.0
M yanm ar
H otel
2002
2005
-3.0
B runei
H otel
2003
2006
14.5
M alaysia
O ffice
2005
2008
-5.5
Lao P D R
H otel
2005
2008
11.0
P hilippines
O ffice
2006
2008
7.3
B runei
O ffice
2006
2008
33.0
T otal
8%/year improving
1,400,000
P ow
w e r Conw um ption
n
(kW h/Y)
T ype of
B uildings
C ountry
20 05 y= 10 0%
20 07 y=6
6 7%
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200 000
200,000
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
Ye a r
2004
2005
2006
2007
11.4
25
Energy Data
Number
of
Buildings
9
160,000
2004
2005
120,000
2006
80,000
40,000
2000
2001
0
5
13
17
21
25
29
33
37
41
45
49
53
57
61
65
69
73
77
Month
2003
2002
2. GFA available
4. All necessary
Information available
200,000
MSB2
ASB1
ASB2
800
700
Electric Con
nsumptiom(kWh)
Gategories
Power Consumption
n (kWh/M)
Floor Area
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0
22008/11/4
22008/11/5
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
26
450-500
25
15:00
14:57
14:54
14:51
14:48
14:45
14:42
14:39
L ttemperature
Low
t
att the
th rooms (EDL 3F)
14:36
20
750-1,000
Toilet (W/lamp)
22
14:33
59
14:30
21
1,500-1,800
Stair
26
24
500-750
300-1,050
Stair corridor
60
14:27
Meeting rm
22
28
14:24
1150
57
14:21
400
54
23
14:18
24
Recorded by Ondotori
30
14:15
600
70
14:12
32
22
14:09
Lecture rm (Students)
14:06
500
30 SEP, 2008
34
58
14:03
400-500
Lecture rm (empty)
(degree Celsius)
14:00
Library-feading are
Temp.(
500
Temterrature
Usage
Library-common
73
27
Electriccity Consuumption
(M
MWh/mon th)
200
2003
2005
2008
150
y = 7.4279x - 66.885
(2003) R 2 = 0.4894
y = 7.4149x - 104.33
(2005) R 2 = 0.6993
100
50
y = 6.9814x - 103.25
(2008) R 2 = 0.7748
0
20
22
24
26
28
30
Outdoor Temperature()
((4)) Occupancy
p
y Ratio and Operation
p
Hours
Operation Hours
Electric poweer kW
400
300
200
100
1,700
23:48:59
22:33:59
21:18:59
20:03:59
18:48:59
17:33:59
16:18:59
15:03:59
13:48:59
12:33:59
11:18:59
8:48:59
10:03:59
7:33:59
6:18:59
5:03:59
3:48:59
2:33:59
0:03:59
1,800
1:18:59
1,900
1 600
1,600
25
1,400
20
1,500
1,300
y = 2037.9x - 158.56
2
R = 0.6979
23:08:55
22:08:55
21:08:55
20:08:55
19:08:55
18:08:55
17:08:55
16:08:55
15:08:55
14:08:55
13:08:55
12:08:55
11:08:55
9:08:55
10:08:55
Occupancy ratio
8:08:55
7:08:55
6:08:55
100%
5:08:55
90%
4:08:55
80%
3:08:55
70%
0%
SUN(11/9)
( / ) BUILDING
MON(11/10) FROM DCP
10
2:08:55
1,100
SAT(11/8)
( / ) FROM DCP
MON(11/10) BUILDING
15
1:08:55
1,200
0:08:55
Electric
c Cons. MWH/
/month
MON(11/10)
500
Occupancy Ratio
1,000
60%
SUN(11/9)
600
29
Outdoor climate
Condition
Equipment
Design
Architectural
Design
Energy
S i
Saving
Specification Standards*
Specification Standards*
To be emphasize
CEC: Coefficient of Energy Consumption
PAL: Perimeter Annual Load by
b PROMEEC Control &
Activities
Management Process Benchmarking:
Benchmark for Operation for EE&C
* The Specification
Standards allow to be
applied for the buildings of
less than 5,000 square
meters in gross floor area
Judging Standards
30
Smaller EEI
Top Level
Performance Benchmark (Best Practice of
Each Group of Buildings)
Average
Process Benchmark (The Best
Practice of Each Building)
Improvement
[Kaizen]
Present Position
(In-house Database)
31
Implementation of EC
measures
Energy Management Tool
In house
In-house
Database
Process
Benchmark
Energy Audit
Computer Simulation
(ESUM/ECCJ)
Tuning Manual
32
33
Architectural Data
Input
Temperature, Humidity,
Amount of Solar
Radiation, Wind Direction,
Wind Velocity
(Data of Meteorological
Agency)
Planar Shape,
O i t ti
Orientation,
Dimensions,
Glass, Blinds
Compare
Facility Data
Number, Capacity, and
Temperature of Air
Conditioners, Heat
Sources, Lights, Plug
Sockets Water Heaters
Sockets,
Heaters,
and Ventilators
Energy Consumption
Track Record Data
I
Input
t
Input
Building Use
Circumstantial
Ci
t ti l D
Data
t
Hours used
No. of In-office
Persons
And so on
34
0.3%
Cooking Steam
0.7%
Washing Steam
0 7%
0.7%
Medical
Disinfection
3.7%
Steam
Hot Water Supply Facility
5.7%
Ventilation Facility
1.9%
Pumps
3.4%
84,289 GJ/Year
3.376 MJ/m2-Year
35
Item
Shielding of the sunshine
Indoor Load
Heat insulation
Eased setting
Air Conditioning
Equipment
Operation control
Reduced load
Secondary Pump
Ventilation Facility
Hot Water Supply Facility
Minimized power
Reduced hot water supply load
36
(GJ)
16,035
1,809
1,024
2 834
2,834
5,824
1,022
6,846
25,714
11,016
1,626
ELV Tr
ELVTr
Case-1
(MJ/m2 )
Case-1
6,458
1,680
8,138
8,138
DHC
11,053
6,568
17,621
17,621
4,808
3,150
549
587
288
146
2,840
1,004
6 177
6,177
48,523
1,943.8
16,035
1,809
1,024
2 834
2,834
23,335
9,270
32,605
51,474
11,016
1,626
4,808
3,150
549
587
288
146
2,840
1,627
6 177
6,177
84,289
16,035
1,631
987
2 618
2,618
5,190
1,000
6,190
24,843
11,016
1,626
26,716
362.5 1,070.2
4,108
1,249
5,357
5,357
DHC
16,035
1,631
987
2 618
2,618
19,730
8,778
28,508
47,161
11,016
1,626
4,808
3,150
549
587
288
146
2,840
1,627
6 175
6,175
79,974
-4,315
3,203.7
-172.9
10,432
6,530
16,961
16,961
4,808
3,150
549
587
288
146
2,840
1,004
6 175
6,175
47,649
-874
3,376.5 1,908.8
-35.0
624
9,050
Case-2
_KCRC060713_2005
624
6,268 26,056
-2,782
-660
251.1 1,043.8
-111.4
-26.4
CASE1:Before Application
CASE2: After Application of Air
Total HEAT EXCHANGERS for
Outdoor air intake
-5.12 %
Annual
primary energy consumption source unit
Air-conditioner
(MJ/m2)
(MJ/
2)
4,000.0
3,500.0
Pump
Light outlet
3,000.0
Ventilating equipment
2,000.0
1,500.0
Case-1
CASE1
Gas
2,000.0
1,500.0
E Power
1,000.0
500.0
Total
0 0
0.0
Oil
2 500 0
2,500.0
Restaurants
500.0
DHC
3,000.0
Medical electricity
1,000.0
Oil
Gas
Gas
3,500.0
Medical steam
Cooking steam
Cooking gas
Cooking electricity
2,500.0
Electricity
(MJ/m2)
4,000.0
0 0
0.0
Case-1
CASE1
Case-2
CASE2
Case-2
CASE2
37
Measure Item
Reduction
(MJ/m2-year)
3376.5
3336.8
3334 2
3334.2
3343.1
3298.8
3308.3
3286.4
3203.7
3030.2
3024.0
0.0
39.7
42 3
42.3
33.4
77.7
68.2
90.1
172.8
346.3
352.5
Reduced Unit
Energy
Consumption
0.00%
1.18%
1 25%
1.25%
0.99%
2.30%
2.02%
2.67%
5.12%
10.26%
10.44%
0.0
1.7
1 8
1.8
1.4
3.3
2.9
3.8
7.2
14.5
14.8
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
12. 0%
1 0. 2 6%
10. 44%
10. 0%
8. 0%
6. 0%
5. 1 2%
4. 0%
2. 67%
2 . 30 %
2. 0%
1. 18%
1. 25%
2 . 0 2%
0. 99%
0. 0%
38
<Operation Stage>
The Contractors
Control
< Safety Side >
EE&C Design
EE&C Management Tool
Construction for EE&C
Setting & Adjustment for
EE&C
Tuning Guidebook
Tuning Manual
(Prepared by ECCJ)
ECCJ
Tuning Items
Load redu
uction
Controlled item
Action required
Effect
Suspension of dehumidifying
control
Remarks
Tenants' consent must be obtained
before modifying the temperature.
Consideration must be given to keep
uniform room temperature distribution.
(Efficient utilization of fans, etc.)
Same as above
If the air-conditioning system consists
of two separate lines (one for inside
air and the other for circumferential
air), care must be taken not to cause
cool air inside the room.
Dehumidification may be covered by
air-cooling.
Attention must be paid to room air
ventilation.
If the system is not equipped with CO2
control tuning is required to maintain
control,
the CO2 level lower than the standard
value.
Outside
Outside air intake control at
startup (Equipped/Not equipped)
40
2002
26C,
26
C, 50%
2003
27C, 50%
Time period:
July
J
l 1 th
through
h
September 3
y = 379.05x - 6211.9
R2 = 0.8088
6% reduction
20000
2003
y = 379.71x - 7556.2
2
R = 0.7438
15000
10000
2002
5000
26.0C
50%
53kJ/kg
0
0
20
40
32.0C
60%
73kJ/kg
60
80
100
E th l off outside
Enthalpy
t id air
i [kJ/kg]
[kJ/k ]
41
Example 2:
Reduction of outside air intake during air conditioning within the range (CO2
concentration:
t ti
1,000
1 000 ppm or less)
l ) allowed
ll
d by
b the
th Law
L for
f Maintenance
M i t
off
Sanitation in Buildings
Note
Building: High-rise office building in Tokyo, 40,000 m2.
(R i l heat
(Regional
h t supply
l = Chilled
Chill d water,
t 25 air-conditioners)
i
diti
)
[Air volume per air conditioner]
Before
B
f
tuning
t i
(/h)
After tuning
Aft
t i
( /h)
2,700
1,900
Circulated air
11,900
11,900
Ventilated air
13,100
13,100
1,500
700
Exhaust air
42
Example 2:
Reduction in heat received from DHC due to reduction of outside air intake
4500
y = 72.291x - 1868.1
2
R = 0.8673
Heat receiv
H
ved [MJ/h]
4000
3500
Before tuning
8% reduction
3000
2500
After tuning
2000
1500
y = 55.322x - 1001.5
2
R = 0.7004
1000
26.0C
50%
53kJ/kg
500
0
40
50
32.0C
60%
73kJ/kg
60
70
80
90
43
1899
1719
1800
1613
1600
1467
[MJ/m2]
1400
1396
1350
1326
1262
1153
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
5.Conclusions
Under the instruction of the Japanese Government (Ministry of Economy, trade
and Industry), ECCJ (The Energy Conservation Center, Japan) has been
conducting the PROMEEC (Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation for
ASEAN countries)
t i )P
Project
j t since
i
2000 under
d the
th collaboration
ll b
ti
off ASEAN
countries. The objective of this project is capacity building for the local
engineers and government officers to implement the activities for promoting
energy efficiency and conservation in Industry and Building sectors in ASEAN
countries.
countries
One of the main activities of this project is energy audits of the target buildings.
ECCJ has implemented short-time energy audits of new buildings and follow-up
surveys of previously audited buildings for the purpose of not only providing the
EE&C recommendations but also transferring the skills and knowledge
regarding energy audit and energy management to the participants of ASEAN
countries. For the last 9 years, 31 buildings have been audited and 11 of 31
buildings have been surveyed in the follow-up.
A
According
di to
t the
th results
lt off th
these energy audits
dit and
d follow-up
f ll
surveys, in
i order
d
to promote and disseminate EE&C in operation of existing buildings in ASEAN,
firstly each building should have their own database for energy management,
In-house Database and then have their own EE&C target (Process Benchmark)
obtained by the analysis of their In-house Database
Database. Providing Energy
Management tools such as ESUM/ECCJ and Tuning Manual is very effective to
assist the EE&C using Process Benchmark.
45
SMART CLOVER
Much
ECCJ is promoting
Four Leaf Clover ,
which is considered
to bring happiness,
as SMART
CLOVER, the
symbol of the
persons who
implement EE&C .
46