Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DOI 10.1007/s11046-014-9801-1
Received: 24 September 2013 / Accepted: 7 August 2014 / Published online: 19 August 2014
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
Introduction
The thermally dimorphic fungus Paracoccidioides
brasiliensis is the etiologic agent of paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM). PCM is the most frequent systemic
mycosis in Latin America, with the highest incidence
of diagnosis in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and
Venezuela [1]. The main route of acquisition is the
inhalation of fungal particles, which usually leads to
123
178
123
179
Fungal Strain
Groups Studied
Ten groups of mice (n = 5 animals each) were used.
Four controls were included: sham non-Dex, untreated
mice; infected non-Dex, mice infected with Pb 18, but
untreated with steroids; sham, uninfected mice immunosuppressed with Dex phosphate; infected, immunosuppressed mice infected with Pb18 strain; CFA/IFA,
immunosuppressed mice, infected and treated with
CFA/IFA; P10, immunosuppressed and infected mice
immunized with P10 peptide; (ITC), immunosuppressed and infected mice treated with itraconazole;
(SMT/TMP), immunosuppressed and infected mice
treated
with
sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim;
ITZ ? P10, immunosuppressed and infected mice,
immunized with P10 and treated with itraconazole;
SMT/TMP ? P10, immunosuppressed and infected
mice, immunized with P10 and treated with SMT/TMP.
Cell Proliferation Assay
Spleen cells were collected from mice according to the
different groups to assess P10-stimulated cellular
proliferation. Spleen cells were collected, dispersed
manually and washed in RPMI 1640 (Cultilab, Brazil)
supplemented with 20 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM HEPES,
100 U/ml of penicillin, 100 lg/ml of streptomycin,
2 mM L-glutamine, 50 lM b-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM
sodium pyruvate, 100 mM non-essential amino acids
(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and 10 % fetal
bovine serum (FBS). Cells were washed twice in FBSfree RPMI, counted, added to 96-well plates at
4 9 105 cells/well and final volume of 200 ll. The
123
180
123
181
Statistical Analysis
Results
Splenocytes from Immunosuppressed Mice
Immunized with P10 Peptide Undergo
Lymphoproliferation When Stimulated with P10
in Vitro
Splenocytes from infected mice, with or without prior
immunosuppression, were exposed in vitro to P10
(Fig. 1). Dex-immunosuppressed animals infected i.t.
for 60 days and with or without treatment with CFA/
IFA or antifungal drugs did not significantly impact
splenocyte proliferation. In contrast, the splenocytes
from immunosuppressed mice that had been immunized with P10 peptide with or without antifungal drug
treatments showed significant proliferation when
stimulated in vitro with P10 when compared with
immunosuppressed and infected animals. These
results indicate that P10 alone strongly stimulated
splenocytes even in immunosuppressed mice after
60 days of infection. As a control, we used splenocytes
stimulated with ConA or infected non-immunosuppressed mice. In both positive control groups, we
observed that splenocyte proliferation was similar to
that achieved in immunosuppressed and P10-stimulated splenocytes, which corresponds to our prior
findings [10].
**
non-Dex
Dex
D.O. 590
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
I
SM TZ
T/
TM
P
P1
P1 0
0+
0+
I
SM TZ
T/
TM
P
P1
on
-s
tim
ul
at
ed
C
on
A
In
fe
ct
ed
In
fe
ct
ed
IF
A/
C
FA
0.0
0.5
Fig. 1 P10 immunization of splenocytes from Dex-immunosuppressed mice significantly increased cellular proliferation.
Splenocytes are isolated from experimental groups after 60 days
i.t. infection with 3 9 105 yeast of P. brasiliensis. Splenocytes
from uninfected mice are incubated in RPMI alone (negative
control) or with ConA (positive control, 4 lg/ml). A second
positive control was the measurement of the proliferation of
splenocytes from infected, untreated mice. The proliferation
rates of splenocytes from immunosuppressed mice with or
without P10 peptide stimulation with or without antifungal
drugs are also assessed. ** p \ 0.01 relative to the control group
123
182
123
dispersed yeast cells (Fig. 4a). In contrast, a significant increase (p \ 0.05) in the number of CD11b?
cells in the lungs of animals immunized with P10 was
observed, with dense clustering of these cells around
rare yeast cells (Fig. 4b). These data indicate that
macrophages accumulated around P. brasiliensis
yeasts in the pulmonary tissue of immunosuppressed
mice immunized with P10 (Fig. 4b). Lungs of animals
that were not immunized showed a prominent number
of fungal cells and a faint Ly-6G/Ly-6C? cellular
staining (Fig. 4c). We can observe an intense staining
in pulmonary tissue of mice immunized with P10,
demonstrating a significant increase (p \ 0.05) in the
number of Ly-6G/Ly-6C? cells within small compact
granulomas in close proximity to rare yeast cells
(Fig. 4d). It is important to note that the monoclonal
antibody used [clone RB6-8C5 from BD Biosciences
(San Diego, CA)] reacts with a common epitope on
Ly-6G and Ly-6C that is present on neutrophils and
eosinophils. In the case of L3T4? cellular population,
pulmonary tissue of mice that were infected and not
immunized revealed a set of fungal cells and non-cell
marking was observed (Fig. 4e). The L3T4? receptor
183
Table 1 Lung cytokine levels after 60 days of infection in immunosuppressed BALB/c mice infected with 3 9 105 yeast cells of P.
brasiliensis Pb18
Cytokine ng/ml
Treatment
Dex
Untreated
Infected
Untreated
IL-4
IL-10
IL-12
IFN-c
2.90 0.99
2.48 0.88
32.40 1.20
14.18 5.67
2.97 1.04
5.24 0.17
72.20 4.8
17.31 3.47
2.24 0.94
3.46 1.89
28.28 9.79
12.44 2.10
Infected
7.23 1.22
10.19 1.09
40.53 3.20
12.87 5.03
IFA/CFA
2.92 4.44
1.23 1.61
58.78 13.49
11.80 10.75
3.30 1.14**
1.49 1.66**
80.22 6.25*
16.94 6.62*
4.95 1.64*
1.64 1.01**
62.74 7.03*
29.49 2.02*
4.37 1.71
1.45 1.34**
83.43 3.13*
17.43 3.91*
P10
ITZ ? P10
SMT/TMP ? P10
non-Dex
Dex
NO (uM)
20
15
*
10
P1
0
I
SM TZ+
P1
T/
TM
0
P+
P1
0
TM
IT
T/
SM
FA
ed
ct
A/
IF
fe
In
nf
ec
t
ed
ed
U
ni
fe
ct
ec
ni
nf
U
In
te
d
is expressed in a subpopulation of mature T lymphocytes, including most T helper cells that exert an
important role in the host defense against fungi. In our
123
184
Discussion
123
185
123
186
Infected
ITZ.
SMT/TMP.
P10
P10+SMT/TMP
P10+ITZ.
Survival (%)
80
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
Days
123
P10 immunization also led to the enhanced production of NO by macrophages. Previous studies have
shown that NO is involved in the inhibition of P.
brasiliensis conidia-to-yeast development [30]. Anergic animals infected with P. brasiliensis and immunized with P10 showed an increased production of NO
in the splenocyte culture supernatants. Such increase
could be related to the increased expression of
CD11b? cells, which were abundant in the lung tissue
of these animals. The CD11b receptor can be
expressed on macrophages, dendritic cells, natural
killer cells, microglia and B-1 cells [31]. Dendritic
cells and macrophages are part of the first line of
defense against P. brasiliensis [32].
In addition to CD11b ? cells, a significant increase
in the number of Ly-6G?/Ly-6C? and L3T4? cells
was shown in the lung tissue of immunosuppressed
animals that have been immunized with P10. Neutrophils and monocytes are Ly-6G?/Ly-6C? cells that
may be involved in the early host response against P.
brasiliensis [33]. T helper and NKT cells are L3T4?
and represent a major cell immune mechanism in host
defense in PCM.
A pro-inflammatory response is important to contain
the infection and the spread of the fungus in the host, but
the deleterious effects of an exacerbated immune
response have to be controlled. Pulmonary fibrosis is a
severe and progressive sequel of PCM. Development of
pulmonary fibrosis is probably attributed to a prolonged
inflammatory stimulus, which is common in PCM [34].
It is noteworthy that animals immunized with P10
showed a decrease in pulmonary fibrosis. A likely
explanation is the remarkable reduction of fungal
burden in the lungs of immunized animals, which leads
to decreased stimulation and less pulmonary fibrosis.
Detection of IFN-c, TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-18 in the
lungs (data not shown), indicated restoration of
cellular immunity in anergic animals immunized with
P10. In PCM, TNF-a is directly related to the
formation of granulomas [35], and together with IL12 and IL-18, potentiates the fungicidal activity of
macrophages.
Evaluation of cytokine responses as well as their
effects on cellular populations is increasingly important for understanding the global immunomodulatory
processes that occur during infection. Recently, new
subpopulations of effectors CD4? T cells (Th9, Th17
and Th22 cells) have been identified as important
mediators in response to fungal infections [35 ].
However, further studies are needed to better understand the resistance mechanisms to pulmonary PCM in
different patient populations.
As compared to 100 % of immunosuppressed and
infected animals that died within 80 days after infection with virulent P. brasiliensis Pb18, those immunized with P10 and treated with sulfamethoxazole/
trimethoprim or ITC were fully protected as all
animals in these treatment groups were alive at the
end of our experiment (200 days).
Currently, treatment of PCM depends on the
severity of the disease, type of drug utilized and the
time of use. Treatment of PCM is often compromised
due to the toxicity of the protracted antifungal therapy
required and relapses due to fungal resistance have
been reported [13]. Presently, we show that peptide
P10 immunization restores specific immunity against
P. brasiliensis even in animals subjected to immunosuppressive treatment with a synthetic corticosteroid
(Dex) in an experimental model of PCM. Complete
protection against the fungal infection without fibrotic
side effects was achieved using a combined approach
of chemotherapeutic drugs and P10 immunization.
The use of P10 as an adjuvant to antifungal
treatment is a promising tool in the treatment of
PCM and this modality also can be considered for the
prevention of relapses [20]. Combined treatment could
be important even in cases of clinical resistance to
azoles and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. The present data strongly suggest that immunization with P10
peptide, even in the setting of immunosuppression, has
significant therapeutic benefits in experimental PCM,
which further supports pursuing clinical trials with the
peptide as a vaccine candidate in human PCM.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by grants
2007/58750-4, 2011/17267-4 and 2010/51423-0 from Fundacao
de Amparo a` Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) and
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientfico e Tecnologico
(CNPq). We acknowledge the valuable technical assistance of the
Laboratory the Immunohistochemistry of Department of
Anatomy, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science,
University of Sao Paulo, and of Carlos da Silva and the animal
facility of Department of Microbiology, University of Sao Paulo.
References
1. Restrepo A, McEwen JG, Castaneda E. The habitat of
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: how far from solving the
riddle? Med Mycol. 2001;39:23341.
187
2. Brummer E, Castaneda E, Restrepo A. Paracoccidioidomycosis: an update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993;6:89117.
3. Franco M. Host-parasite relationships in paracoccidioidomycosis. J Med Vet Mycol. 1987;25:518.
4. Calich VL, Singer-Vermes LM, Russo M, et al. Immunogenetics in paracoccidioidomycosis. In: Franco M, Lacaz
CS, Restrepo A, del Negro G, editors. Paracoccidioidomycosis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1994. p. 15173.
5. Castaneda E, Brummer E, Pappagianis D, et al. Impairment
of cellular but not humoral immune responses in chronic
pulmonary and disseminated paracoccidioidomycosis in
mice. Infect Immun. 1988;56:17717.
6. Singer-Vermes LM, Caldeira CB, Burger E, et al. Experimental murine paracoccidioidomycosis: relationship among
the dissemination of the infection, humoral and cellular
immune responses. Clin Exp Immunol. 1993;94:759.
7. Brummer E, Hanson LH, Restrepo A, et al. In vivo and
in vitro activation of pulmonary macrophages by IFN-c for
enhanced killing of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis or Blastomyces dermatitidis. J Immunol. 1988;140:27869.
8. Puccia R, Travassos LR. 43-Kilodalton glycoprotein from
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: immunochemical reactions
with sera from patients with paracoccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, or Jorge Lobos disease. J Clin Microbiol.
1991;29:16105.
9. Vicentini AP, Gesztesi JL, Franco MF, et al. Binding of
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis to laminin through surface
glycoprotein gp43 leads to enhancement of fungal pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 1994;62:14659.
10. Taborda CP, Juliano MA, Puccia R, et al. Mapping of the
T-cell epitope in the major 43-kilodalton glycoprotein of
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis which induces a Th-1
response protective against fungal infection in BALB/c
mice. Infect Immun. 1998;66:78693.
11. Rodrigues EG, Travassos LR. Nature of the reactive epitopes in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis polysaccharide antigen. J Med Vet Mycol. 1994;32:7781.
12. Iwai LK, Yoshida M, Sadahiro A, et al. T-cell recognition of
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis gp43-derived peptides in
patients with paracoccidioidomycosis and healthy individuals. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14:4746.
13. Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Telles-Filho FQ, Mendes RP, et al.
Guidelines in paracoccidioidomycosis. Rev Soc Bras Med
Trop. 2006;39:297310.
14. Hahn RC, Conceicao YTM, Santos NL, Ferreira JF,
Hamdan JS. Disseminated paracoccidioidomycosis: correlation between clinical and in vitro resistance to ketoconazole and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole. Mycoses.
2003;46:3427.
15. Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Duarte MI, Nunes DF, et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis in a renal transplant recipient. J Med
Vet Mycol. 1995;6:4114.
16. Ribeiro L, Hahn RC, Favalessa OC, Tadano T, Fontes CJFF.
Systemic mycosis: factors associated with death among
patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus,
Cuiaba, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil, 20052008. Rev Soc
Bras Med Trop. 2009;6:698705.
17. Morejon KM, Machado AA, Martinez R. Paracoccidioidomycosis in patients infected with and not infected with
human immunodeficiency virus: a case-control study. Am J
Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:35966.
123
188
18. Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Vitali LH, Martinez R. Serological
diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis in HIV-coinfected
patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010;105:9047.
19. Chung YJ, Lee JI, Chong S, et al. Anti-proliferative effect
and action mechanism of dexamethasone in human medullary thyroid cancer cell line. Endocr Res. 2011;36:
14957.
20. Marques AF, da Silva MB, Juliano MA, et al. Additive
effect of P10 immunization and chemotherapy in anergic
mice challenged intratracheally with virulent yeasts of
Paracoccidioides
brasiliensis.
Microbes
Infect.
2008;10:12518.
21. Restrepo A, Arango MD. In vitro susceptibility testing of
paracoccidioides brasiliensis to sulfonamides. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 1980;18:1904.
22. Magalhaes A, Ferreira KS, Almeida SR, et al. Prophylactic
and Therapeutic Vaccination Using Dendritic Cells Primed
with Peptide 10 Derived from the 43-Kilodalton Glycoprotein of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Clin Vaccine
Immunol. 2011;19:239.
23. Blotta MH, DeKruyff RH, Umetsu DT. Corticosteroids
inhibit IL-12 production in human monocytes and enhance
their capacity to induce IL-4 synthesis in CD4 ? lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1997;158:558995.
24. Li Y, Ito N, Suzuki T, et al. Dexamethasone inhibits nitric
oxide-mediated cytotoxicity via effects on both macrophages and target cells. Immunopharmacology. 1995;30:
17786.
25. Travassos LR, Goldman G, Taborda CP, Puccia R. Insights
in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis pathogenicity. In: Kavanagh K, editor. New insights in medical mycology. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 24165.
26. Souto JT, Figueiredo F, Furlanetto A, et al. Interferongamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha determine
123
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.