Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
(Lahore),25(4),791-795,,2013
791
1. INTRODUCTION
Aquaculture is fast becoming an important industry
worldwide compared to any other animal food producing
sector [1]. In Malaysia, aquaculture industry in particular
either fresh water fish or salt water fish farming is
developing rapidly. This development is encouraging in not
only reducing the dependence of imported fish but also to
increase the income of the fish farmer involved in the
programme.
The static pond system aquaculture in general is widely used
in Malaysia. Based on the Malaysian Fisheries Development
Authority report, there are 10 high impact aquaculture
projects (HIP-ZIA) throughout Malaysia [2]. This project
requires a large quantity of water, land area and also pose on
environmental problem. This type of industry will generate
polluted effluents which causes the pollution. In addition,
the accumulation of feed residue and fish excreta during
cultivation often causes water quality deterioration in
fishponds, resulting in toxic effects to the fish. Aquaculture
farm discharged into receiving waters can further degrade
the water quality and cause a problem to aquatic life.
Therefore, an appropriate wastewater treatment process, in
particular a low cost system is helpful for sustaining
aquaculture development in Malaysia.
Water quality parameters that are most concerned are
inorganic solid suspension (ISS), total suspended solid
(TSS), biological oxygen demand (BOD), dissolved oxygen
(DO) and ammonia. In addition to total phosphorus (TP),
nitrate and pH of water discharged will cause health
problems to the habitat life around the receiving waters. A
number of studies had been carried out for the treatment of
wastewater [3]-[5]. Use of constructed wetlands for
aquaculture wastewater treatment is a continuous process
that should be given a high consideration. This is because it
792
Sci.Int.(Lahore),25(4),791-795,,2013
R4
D1
A2
B3
C4
Notes: Unit A consist of oil palm shell (OPS); Unit B consist of rice husk
(RH); Unit C consist of granite (GN); Unit D consist of gravel (GV)
4.6-4.7
0.68 0.02
2.33 0.17
COD
(mg/L)
1961 13
4.7-4.8
7.0-7.1
6.8-6.9
0.35 0.10
0.34 0.10
0.24 0.04
0.48 0.04
0.33 0.02
0.18 0.04
371 55
168 7
17 6
792
Sci.Int.(Lahore),25(4),791-795,,2013
3000
2685
2565
2627
Trial
2500
COD, mg/L
500
224
154
105
A1
B2
C3
D4
97
98
96
99
92
90
91
90
96
97
94
98
72
90
93
88
98
98
95
99
73
92
96
89
Average
97
98
95
99
79
91
93
89
171
154
75
23
85
95
69
56
66
0
Initial
A1
B1
C1
D1
Media types
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
(a)
3000
2685
2565
2627
2500
2000
COD, mg/L
Media
1500
1000
1500
1000
500
273
253
223
210
122
95
121
82
33
76
46
56
0
Initial
B2
C2
D2
A2
Media types
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
(b)
3000
2685
2565
2627
2500
2000
COD, mg/L
Sequence
2000
1500
1000
500
237
181
98
76
69
43
79
52
121
95
161
125
0
Initial
C3
D3
A3
B3
Media types
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
(c)
3000
2685
2565
2627
2500
2000
COD, mg/L
793
1500
1000
500
279
302
289
210
204
59
85
23
259
26
46
26
0
Initial
D4
A4
B4
C4
Media types
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
(d)
Figure.1 COD performance in sequences (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d)
4, for different types of media
794
Sci.Int.(Lahore),25(4),791-795,,2013
60
(a)
Trial
1
2
3
B2
0.95 (0.11)
0.97 (0.05)
1.11 (0.03)
Trial
C3
1.11 (0.08)
2
3
0.34 (0.01)
0.48 (0.01)
Trial
1
2
3
D4
1.33 (0.09)
1.61 (0.05)
0.87 (+0.02)
B1
0.031 (0.010)
(b)
C2
0.032 (0.014)
(c)
D3
0.0347(0.0162
)
(d)
A4
0.32 (0.08)
-
52.9
C1
-
D1
-
D2
-
A2
-
52
51.4
50
39.9
40
35
TDS, mg/L
A1
0.85 (0.13)
0.048 (0.016)
0.62 (0.04)
30
24.9
24.6
22.1
20.9
20
10
4.9
5.9
3.7
4.9
4.6
3.5
0
Initial
A1
B1
C1
D1
Media types
A3
-
B3
-
60
B4
-
C4
-
40
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
(a)
52.7
48.7
50
TDS, m
g/L
Trial
1
2
3
39.4
30
24.6
22.1
20.9
19.4
20
19.4
10
5.9
5.5
5.6
5.4
3.7
3.5
0
Initial
B2
C2
D2
A2
Media types
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
(b)
30
24.6
25
22.1
20.9
20
TDS, mg/L
15
10
5.1
5.1
5.1
6.1
5.5
4.9
3.9
4.9
4.9
4.5
3.9
3.7
0
Initial
C3
D3
A3
B3
Media types
794
Trial 2
Trial 3
(c)
30
24.6
25
22.1
20.9
20
TDS, mg/L
4. CONCLUSION
Biodegradable (oil palm shell and rice husk) and nonbiodegradable (granite and gravel) materials used as media
for treatment of catfish pond wastewater proved to be
effective for the removal of COD, TSS, TDS and managed
to increase the effluent pH to a neutral condition. However,
rice husk is less effective on removal of the TDS. Effects of
sequence order do not apply for COD, TSS removal and pH
but has a selected effect to TDS. A combination of granite
with oil palm shell or rice husk, and gravel with oil palm
shell or rice husk are recommended to be effective pollutant
removal from fish pond wastewater.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported by the Universiti Sains Malaysia
Short Term Grants No. 304/PJJAUH/6310091. The authors
would like to express their gratitude to Assoc. Prof.
Mohamed Ismail Mohamed Ibrahim for his valuable
comment and suggestion to this article.
Trial 1
15
10
6.2
5.4
5.3
5.4
4.9
3.3
3.7
5.8
5.7
3.1
0
Initial
D4
A4
B4
C4
Media types
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
(d)
Figure 2 Total dissolved solid performance in sequence (a) 1, (b)
2, (c) 3, and (d) 4 for different types of media.
Sci.Int.(Lahore),25(4),791-795,,2013
REFERENCES
[1] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation), The State
of World Fisheries and Aquaculture Food and
Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome,
. 2002.
[2] Official website of the Malaysian Fisheries
Development Authority (Lembaga Kemajuan Ikan
Malaysia, LKIM), www.lkim.gov.my
[3] W.J.B. Saliling, P.W. Westerman, T.M. Losordo,
Wood chips and wheat straw as alternative biofilter
media for denitrification reactors treating aquaculture
and other wastewaters with high nitrate concentrations.
Aquaculture Engineering, 37, 222-233, 2007.
[4] G.L. Palacios, M.B. Timmons,. Determining design
parameters for recovery of aquaculture wastewater
using sand beds. Aquaculture Engineering, 24, pp 289299, 2001
[5] Y.F. Lin, S.R. Jing, D.Y Lee, T.W. Wang, Nutrient
removal from aquaculture wastewater using a
constructed wetlands system. Aquaculture,. vol. 209,
pp. 169-184, 2002.
795
[6] International
Water
Association,.
Constructed
Wetlands for Pollution Control. Process, Performance,
Design and Operation. IWA Publishing, London, pp
156, 2000,
[7] American Public Health Association, APHA,
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater (18th Edition). American Water Works
Association and Water Environment Federation,
Washington, New York, 1992.
[8] Ahmad Md Noor, A.Y. Siew, H.L.H. Chong, H.P.S.
Abdul Khalil, S. Suryani, Suitability of oil palm fiber
and kernel as media in determining of oxygen demand
in subsurface flow of constructed wetland, in
Proceeding of the Environment and green chemistry
symposium, 12th Asian Chemical Congress (12ACC),
Kuala Lumpur, vol. II, pp. 124-132, 2007.
[9] Water Quality Index Classes, Malaysian Environment
Quality Report, 2008.
[10] L. Yang, L. Chou, and W. K. Shieh, Biofilter
treatment of aquaculture water for reuse applications,
Water Research, vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 3097-3108, 2001.