(2) MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v PASAY TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC., jurisdiction as shall hereafter be prescribed by law (S26).

be prescribed by law (S26). When the Organic Act

ET AL. November 25, 1932
MALCOLM, J.
FACTS
MEC filed a petition before the SC requesting its members to sit as a board of
arbitrators, and to fix the terms upon which certain transportation companies
shall be permitted to use the Pasig bridge of the MEC and the compensation to
be paid to the MEC by such transportation companies.
The request was made, in pursuant, to S11 of Act No. 1446 (entitled "An Act
granting a franchise to Charles M. Swift to construct, maintain, and operate an
electric railway, and to construct, maintain, and operate an electric light, heat,
and power system from a point in the City of Manila in an easterly direction to
the town of Pasig, in the Province of Rizal."), which provides:
"Whenever any franchise or right of way is granted to any other person or corporation,
now or hereafter in existence, over portions of the lines and tracks of the grantee herein,
the terms on which said other person or corporation shall use such right of way, and the
compensation to be paid to the grantee herein by such other person or corporation for
said use, shall be fixed by the members of the Supreme Court, sitting as a board of
arbitrators, the decision of a majority of whom shall be final."
speaks of the exercise of "jurisdiction" by the Supreme Court, it could not only
mean the exercise of "jurisdiction" by the Supreme Court acting as a court, and
could hardly mean the exercise of "jurisdiction" by the members of the Supreme
Court, sitting as a board of arbitrators. There is an important distinction
between the Supreme Court as an entity and the members of the Supreme Court.
A board of arbitrators is not a "court" in any proper sense of the term, and
possesses none of the jurisdiction which the Organic Act contemplates shall be
exercised by the Supreme Court.
Confirming the decision to the basic question at issue, the Supreme Court holds
that section 11 of Act No. 1446 contravenes the maxims which guide the
operation of a democratic government constitutionally established, and that it
would be improper and illegal for the members of the Supreme Court, sitting as
a board of arbitrators, the decision of a majority of whom shall be final, to act on
the petition of the Manila Electric Company. As a result, the members of the
Supreme Court decline to proceed further in the matter.

Opposition was entered to the petition by a number of public utility operators.

--------------------------------
WON S11 of Act No. 1446 is valid.
Held: No
The Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands represents one of the three
divisions of power in our government. It is judicial power and judicial power
only which is exercised by the Supreme Court. Just as the Supreme Court, as the
guardian of constitutional rights, should not sanction usurpations by any other
department of the government, so should it as strictly confine its own sphere of
influence to the powers expressly or by implication conferred on it by the
Organic Act. The Supreme Court and its members should not and cannot be
required to exercise any power or to perform any trust or to assume any duty
not pertaining to or connected with the administering of judicial functions.

The Organic Act provides that the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands shall
possess and exercise jurisdiction as heretofore provided and such additional