RUBRICS for seminar evaluation

Name of student:

Grading scale
Name of evaluator :
A B C D
Max.marks:50 40- 30- 15-29 <15
50 39
Criteri Level of Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor
a Perform (100%) (80%) (60%) (20%)
ance scor
e
1.Knowledge and
Content (25)marks

Information presented as Information presented in Most of Hard to follow;

1. 1Organization of interesting story in logical, logical sequence; easy to information sequence of
presentation(5) easy to follow sequence follow presented in information
sequence jumpy

1.2 Literature survey Material sufficient for Material sufficient for Material sufficient Material not
and background content clear understanding AND clear understanding AND for clear clearly related to
(minimum 10 papers)(5) exceptionally presented effectively presented understanding but topic OR
not clearly background
presented dominated

1.3.Methods (5) Sufficient for Sufficient for Sufficient for Methods too brief
understanding AND understanding AND understanding but or insufficient for
exceptionally presented effectively presented not clearly adequate
understanding
presented
OR too detailed
1.4.Results (figures, All figures clear, Most figures clear Majority of figures Some figures
graphs, tables, etc.) (5) appropriately formatted ,appropriately clear ,appropriately hard to read
,Exceptionally explained formatted ,Well explained formatted and ,inappropriate
Reasonably format and
explained lacking
explanations

1.5.Knowledge of Demonstrated full At ease; answered all At ease with Does not have
subject(5) knowledge; answered all questions but failed to information; grasp of
questions with elaboration elaborate answered most information;
 SREEBUDDHA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,AYATHIL

DEPT.OF .

SEMINAR EVALUATION SHEET

Roll CRITERIA Total GRA

No. mark DE
s
(50)
Name of (1.1) (1.2) (1.3) (1.4) (1.1) (2.1) (2.2) (2.3) (2.4) (2.5) 3
student 5mar 5mark 5mar 5mar 5mar 5mar 5mar 5mar 5mar 5mar 5mar
ks s ks ks ks ks ks ks ks ks ks

Name of evaluator
Signature