Você está na página 1de 4
INTHE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND UNDER $8.27(13),5 Bill of Rights Act 19905 1.5.25 High Court Riles INTHE MATTER OF 5.24 Local Electoral Act 2001 BETWEEN Friedrich Jouchim Febling, PO.Box 95, Haihari 7865, NZ, ‘engineer against royal corruption forthe GENERAL PUBLIC’ interest, Painif in pesson AND R (ako called Regina (Res), Queen (King), the Crown, Elizabeth Windsor), ‘Buckingham Palace, London, England, ‘Representative: Governor-General, Government House, Wellington, NZ, Defendant DATED 6° June 2016 STATEMENT OF CLAIM (Rolict Request Nullfying uf Auudemoerate 8.26 Local Bletor (caclosed is an Application for Injunction] 10 ‘The Regis, High Court, POBox 28, Greymouth AND TO Ria the Govesnor Geness, Government Hout, Welington ANDTO ‘The General Public ALSOTO The Germas Embusy and German Media INTHE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ‘GREYMOUTH REGISTRY ccrv.2016-418-000020, BETWEEN [FRIEDRICH JOACHIM FEBLING Plinitt AND THE CROWN Defendant Hing 25 July 2016 ‘Appearances: Paintin son via audiovisual ink Co Lange for the Crown Date of Minute: 26 July 2016 received on 4/8/16 MINUTE OF NATION J [1] 0n28 June 2016, the High Court at Greymouth eovepted a sttement of claim. from Mr Febling. The document does notin its body set out precisely what relief Mr FFehling is looking for but on its font shoe are the words “Relief request: mlifying lof ant-democraie 24 lal eectoral act”. It loo refere to an enelosed application for injunction, Within the statement of claim are wide-ranging arguments end iscusive statements. These reflect Mr Febling’s view tht feedoms within Now Zealand are ats fom fascist organisations and a fascist brotherhood that extends ‘to Froemason lodges, the courts andthe Royal Family. [2) On the same day the gh Court at Greymouth sccepted that statement of claim, it accepted an interlocuory application “without notice” for an injunction ‘The defendants named in the proceedings were The Queen and the Govemor- General INTHE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND (GREYMOUTH REGISTRY civ.2016-218-020 INTHE MATTER OF SECTION 24 LOCAL ELECTORAL ACT BETWEEN FRIEDRICH JOACHIM FEHLING Plainctt AND (ALSO CALLED REGINA (REX), QUEEN (cing), THE CROWN, ELIZABETH WINDSOR}, BUCKINGHAM PALACE, LONDON, ENGLAND, REPRESENTATIVE: GOVERNOR-GENERAL Respondent MEMORANDUM OF COUNSEL J Lange | HF McKenzie ‘CROWN soLICITOR'S OFFICE RAYMOND DONNELLY & CO PO 80x33 ox wxa146 Cchistchureh 8140 TELEPHONE (03) 366 0264 (MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: Preliminary 1. This memorandum summarises the defendant's documents filed in response tothe plaints: 11 interlocutory application for an injunction; and 1.2 statement of claim 2 The plaintiff has also fled an application for the honourable Justice Nation to recuse himself (dated 4 August 2016). By Minute dated & ‘August 2016, Justice Nation directed the Court not to accept the plaintiff's application in its current form. The defendant therefore does at respond to that application 3. For convenience, the Crown is referred to here as “the defendant,” although itis correctly variously the applicant (for a strike out}, the respondent (to the application for an injunction), and the defendant (to the statement of aim), Defendant's documents fled in response 4. The defendant files: 4.1 notice of opposition to application for injunction; 4.2 submissions in. support of opposition to application for Injunction; and 43. notice of application to strike out the plainti’s statement of 5. The defendant wil ile further submissions as required and as directed ‘bythe honourable Court as this matter progresses This memorandum i

Você também pode gostar