Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
IIIIIWEl
IHlUHIIl
TECHNICAL
IIII~2
INFORMATION
CENTER
5 0644 00004896 1
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY -7-
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Mr. Neff/cJg/3937
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND 21005
Comm ner T M L LI
,ECOPyR
US Army Tank-Automotive Camand
AWN: AMSTA-QST
Warren, Michigan 48090r
REFE~iFNj
1. REFERENCES:
One vehicle, truck, utility, l/4-ton, 4X4, M151A2, US Army Reg. No. NBO4A,
produced under contract No. DAAEO7-71-C-0103, was subjected to a 5000-mile
comparison test at this installation during the period 24 May to 2 July
1973.
The over-all configuration of the M151A2 vehicle is basically the same
as previous models; all models incorporate the product improvements pre-
viously evaluated on the M151A2 vehicle. The most significant of the
3. OBJE)IVTE:
4. SUN4ARY OF RESULTS:
One M151A2 vehicle, USA Reg. No. NB004A, was received from the contractor's
plant, via commercial carrier, on 24 May 1973 in an acceptable condition
in accordance with applicable shipping procedures.
After completion of all performance tests the test tires, and wheels were
reinstalled for remainder of test. Remaining break-in mileage (420-miles) "
LiI
,
I
STEAP 49-U
SUBJECT: Final Letter Report on Ccmparison Test of Truck, Utility, 1/4-
Ton, 4X, M151A2, USA Reg. No. EBOOlA, Mfg. Serial No. 26801,
TECOM Project No. I-VG-120-151-O67, Report No. APG-Wf-341
Weight, LB
Ioad Location Curb Cross-Country Highay
3
STEAP4f-U
SUJET: Final Letter Report on Couaqrison Test of Truck, Utility, 1/14-
Ton, 14X14, M151A2, USA Beg. No. NBOO0eA, Mfg. Serial No. 26801,,
TECMJ Project No. 1-VG-120-151-06T, Report No. APG-ffl-431l
O~The 6-1/2% slope is not available at APG; 10% slope speed was 29.5 mph
and 60% slope speed was 7.8 mph (Ref. Incl. 1, Page 2).
dThe radiated. and conducted electcanagnetic emissions from the test item
exceeded the specified a11oviable limits of MIL-ST-461A for class inA
Equipment over the frequency ranges where tests were perf ormed.
14
STEAP-M]-U
SUBJECT: Final Letter Report on Camparison Test of Truck, Utility, 1/4-
Ton, 4A, ?151A2, USA Reg. No. IBOOiA, Mfg. Serial No. 26801,
TECOM Project No. l-VG-120-151-067, Report No. APG-MT-4341
Frequencies and amplitudes where the test item failed are given in Inclo-
sure 1, Pages 4 thru 25.
5
STEAP41T-U
SUBJECT: Final Letter Report on Comparison Test of Truck, Utility, 1/4-
Ton, 4X4, M151A2, TA Reg. No. NBO01 A, Mfg. Serial No. 26801,
TECCM Project No. l-VG-120-151-067, Report No. APG-T-434J
Upon completion of all testing a final inspection of the vehicle was per-
formed. A limited teardown and inspection of the engine, power train,
brake, suspension, and electrical systems was accanplished. The radial
test tires and wheels were removed fron the vehicle and original tires
and wheels reinstalled on the vehicle. The test tires and wheels are
stored in the warehouse awaiting instruction fron AMSTA-RKW.
The vehicle was restored to code "B" condition, given a technical inspec-
tion, painted, lubricated, and returned to supply channels.
5. CONCLUSIONS:
It is concluded that:
2 Ind H. A.BE
1. Test Data Acting Associate Director
2. Deficiencies and Shortcomings Materiel Testing Directorate
6
STEAP49-U
SUBJECT: Final Letter Report on Comparison Test of Truck, Utility, 1/-
Ton, 4X4, M151A2, USA Reg. No. NB001 IA, Mfg. Serial No. 26801,
TECO4 Project No. 1-VG-120-151-067, Report No. APG-T-43I3
Copies Furnished:
Cdr, TECOM, APG, MD. 21005, ATTN: AMSTE-1B (2 cys)
Cdr, TACOM, Warren, Mich. 48090
ATTN: AMSTA-QST (2 cys)
AMSTA-QKT (1 cy)
AMSTA-W (1 cy)
AMSTA-QE (20 cys)
AMSTA-EPT (1 cy)
AMSTA-QC (1 cy)
AMSTA-4 (1 cy)
Chief, DCASO, South Bend, 2015 Western Ave., South Bend, Ind. 46621
ATTN: DCRI-DIGS-C (6 cys)
Dir, DCASR, Chicago, O'Hare International Airport, P. 0. Box 66475,
Chicago, Ill. 60666, ATTN: DCRI-FCM (1 cy)
AM General Corp., 701 W. Chippewa Ave., South Bend, Ind. 46623
ATTN: Mr. Yeakey (QA),
Cdr, APG, MD. 21005
ATTN: STEAP-TL (1)
STEAP-T-U (8 cys)
SMP-MT -X (1 C)
Cdr, DDC, Alexandria, VA. 22314, ATTN: Docu Svc Cntr (2 cys)
7
TEST DATA
Inclosure 1, Page 1
Test Requirements Results
P
Page 2
Test Requirements Results
1
Page 3
EIBC1aRQAGNNUICINEFRNEVAUTO
1. OBJECTIVE
To measure and determine if the radiated and conducted electromagnetic
interference (DII) emission levels from the Truck, Utility, 1/ Ton,
4X4, Model K151A2, Serial No. NBOA-26801, USA Reg No. NB004A, and its
electrical accessories are within the specified allowable limits of
MIL-STD-461A for Class IIIa equipment.
2. CRITERIA
Radiated and conducted DII emissions from the complete vehicle including
its electrical accessories shall not exceed the specified allowable
limits of MIL-STD-61A for Class IIIa equipment.
3. MM'OD
Spectrum Surveillance System Model FSS-250D, Serial No. 33, is used to
collect and record the radiated and conducted 1I emission measurements.
1
Page 4
?.A3L3 I
Special Operating Conditions
l4. RESUMfS
The subject vehicle failed the radiated and conducted EMI emission
subtests RE05 and CE03, MIL-STD-461A for Class Ila equipment.
1
Page 5
TANA II
Radiated and Conducted Ia 1mission Results
Bad Emission (Rw5) Cond Alussion (Cuo3)
Item/Accssory DesC. Passed Failed Passed Failed
mf5A2 Truck X X
Radiated Eaissions, Subtest REOB5 - Frequency range, 150 kHz to 100 MHz.
Radiated XMI emissions from the ignition and battery charging systems,
windshield wiper motor and directional signal/4-way flasher were within
the allowable limits of the governing specification. However radiated
EMI emissions from the electric horn assembly (switching CU/OFF) exceeded
the allowable limits of the governing specification. Radiated EMI
emission measurements could not be made over the frequency ranges from
150 kHz to 21.5 MHz because of excessively high RF ambient noise levels,
0-42 db above specification limits, with exception of the radiated emission
subtests of the electric horn assembly. It was possible to masure the
radiated emissions from the electric horn assembly above the RF ambients
because the magnitude of these emissions exceeded the R? ambieat noise
level. Susiary tabulations of the radiated EMI emission accessory failures
(Subtest RE05) are shown in Table In.
1
Page 6
2ALE II
BaAted Da Biasion Accessory Failures
M-sD- lA (PO5) - 156 kiz - 1ooo Mz
Freq Range Db Above Ant. (25-200 MHz)
Sys/Acces. Desc. (NHz) Spec Limit Loc/Polar
F - Front of vehicle
L - Left side of vehicle engine compartment
R - Right side of vehicle engine compartment
V - BIA-25 Biconical Antenna vertically polarized (25-200 MHz)
H - BIA-25 Biconical Antenna horizontally polarized (25-200 MHz)
Mode 5 - Ref Table I
*Electric horn assembly operated ON/OFF (60 cpm)
1
Page 7
electric horn assembly exceeded the allowable limits of the governing
specification. Summary tabulations of the conducted EMI emission accessory
failures (Subtest CE03) are shown in Table IV below:
TABLE IV
Conducted EMI Emission Accessory Failures
Legend:
5. ANALYSIS
Although the vehicle ignition and battery charging systems were operating
simultaneously during performance of radiated and conducted emission tests
of these accessories, it was quite evident by the nature of the emissions
measured that they were being produced by the battery charging system.
1
Page 8
Radiated and conducted emission results obtained during conduct of the
tests herein contained are comparable with those obtained during previous
tests of the M151A2 Utility Trucks.
Truck, Utility, 1/4 Ton, 4X4, M151A2, AM General Corp, S/N NBO04A-26801
(252 miles at end of test)
1. Engine AM General Corp Model M151 series, 141.5 ClD, 4 cylinder liquid
cooled, gasoline, S/N 5018019, Ord Part No. 11613729
4. Horn, Electric, Automotive - Sparton Corp No. 14S-50M-C, Mfg Part No.
MS-51074-1
1
Page 9
LIST OF INSTRUMENTATION AND FACILITIES
2. Ancillary equipment for radiated emissions (RE05) - 150 kHz to 1000 MHz
1
Page 10
.1c:r CL
71
=C)
C)
4
7-Lc,2-
,)!N-,cnLn
Ln
1
V) s),
-c'
C>-
Car)
C"i
M:f.D C4
"a
am I Q) Cr)
CM 0
EM -S-
C\j (D I -::c (1)4-)
CC) c "*--- - - -AHH
I
C)
-c; s- 'o
5 zo F: r, -4-
4s
4 0 1-4 V2 - - -
r3 vi 1 1
7 to
41
3
to
-1 --4-4
0
-4 4-V
Pape
i A 4-
At
..........
C ) N
. . ..
.
=C) cm
to
cn
C )M cl
C)Lr) E
n _
,_u=n_,;Zcn:)
C"i ...........
..........
-to 1 (1) CV)
L>_4Lf).a 1 ,=
I "Cj 0
C; en , 4 4-
z 0 -4. t- -1 F ...-
W
mc V2 0
-4-i-F
1f -4
-F -C
TAU M _-y
- - -- -- - -
T_
ig
.4 44
.
.. ..
Z z
TI
jolsw aw I "oql qa
PaRe 12
4 ILO
F--3
41
11
Pare 13
Cob
- --- ----------
C)
r- u .. .. C14
LO ;C ,
Co
.3a
in
-i a LC) Cv)
w
"
C
6-4 NO C
ELO coy-,-:)
cliC lI
01.)li
0
s uiq*io 4-
cwlccrvm Ln 0)
u3uj
to
Ad .... ..
-P,tip
r!.,c 0
i IS
.. . ... jA-
-----------
cm
I y qa
Page 14
C)
MCI
LO to
I C)
M: CJLC)
-CCU) 0) CV)
0 3c
QC) S-_ :3 0
Eu-) -0) -------
Cj W 1 <:::-4-3
00 (ALrb___c LO
UvKt"O m
-Choc ME -
6 0 v3W
0 S_ to U-kr,
5 z i
O."A -00 - -
4 E.:c P C3
0 1-4 m
Z: t3 ri rl
F
00 0
- ---------
2 IN
.4 Zz
0
0
is 0
>
5 . . ... .
. . ... . . .. .. . 0
CM
II I [J
i l l lk
''I- - I , M I
Page 15
C)
04
4
cn C*)
C) U")
uj
too wm
or,
1.-" 0 3c
. . 0.
-0 C) N-:3 0
E Lo ta
W I CCO 4-3
co W V)r-= -C-Lo
I tn
MCC -cr
r_
0.6
4 0
---------
........
........
>
01%
Page 16
n~jflAO~I~Ij
I~f4 .AICAq
I
11
Page
17
[ ______'A ______
.10
- - - - - - - - - - -- -
Cj 0) C4
S.. 'S
0 C) too- -0
A A
fj U- (-) 5-
C) E 7
c
C30 a) a cn
Mu) -4A -0
Cjr- 9<06
CO*r- Cc o- %0 cn-
M <qj- 0
f-,u m
top -TEZ
E -T 4
z FEW
_rvt- E H f H
-4--* 3c
IMF 9
t0190A
3ft TRA-fff
4-
--- --- -i 17
1 17 1 . ...
-1 jvr I f +-V z =1,-Aa7v -P-MM
J/H
tA I
---....
t i i Tfff-
4
f-i
Page 18
C4
(D
6 Cj
5
OC) go m
- - - - - - - - - - -
S- - 4-) C) M
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
fl- CV) H - - -- - - - - - -
0
r-c..J" CID En
<C>-, W r- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
au-) . (7m F-:)
CJ r- I c:C 4)1--4
- ----- -------
- ---- -----------
---- ------ -- ---
-------- - -- -----
-------- - ---- ---
---------- --------
------------- -- ------------
- --- ------
- --- - -- - - - - - - - - -- ----- - --- - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -
oj
------------
----
-- -- ------
------ -------
C\j
-4 ------------ -
-------------
CrN
0
------ --------- -
-- -- --------
-----------------
04
E=r
-
----------
7
a To I E "oqy
Pape 19
C\i
10
-----------
cn (U- C4
C\J E
-0 0_
OC fo 5-
+>CD
IOLL. C)
a) 4-3r- cv,)
ZI --------------
CO =77kO W
P CDLL
0 ,vw
4-) CO btj W
m
-PIS
t-4 m
MWER-Im
if[
_4 K /I jr J.
-t/H --A-m-44 :M-- C\j
------- -------
(\j
--
L A Ffj[ MM*z-
-7
Page 20
44.
4--
8 cd- C
5) - h ()- - - -
-- - - - --- --
Page----21
C'4
a ON a)-
C)
A
C)
co 0
Q)r- - - - -- -
(w CV)
04-4 to -- - - - - -
for-- =3 --- - - - - - - - -
2 LA-
.4 OIA r-
cl- 0
CMD r-IML 4J %0
co "--r- to- r- - - - - - -
Mtr "::r
cn u
C) I- - - - - - - TIT
WT
AMFI
31rc
to 0 - - --- -
...........
- - - - - - - - - - -
--- - - - - - - - - - - - - ---
lob
t JTTH
4. V A
- -
E
0
ti
r?4
04
a NEW
7
15-4mupow -1" 6 1 oqy Q J-I--f-Ij 1-11
Page 22
CYCD
C)i
7n i P 4 - - -- - - - -
ftm" :=3q q=3
17
23
Page m --------
. . . . .. . . .
7
C-4
in to
4
V) Lf)
-E
ag)
M 4JTX-
to 0
2 .0 C)
ELC)
C"Ja) 1-4:04-w-==7
Coo V)
M C) -4- - - A:
c) t
AULL -4 t-14-1
7
Ef-
-------- --------------
0
------------
t
i l li f i l I
Vt
f EkT--Ey -41 1- 1j.
l I . t 1J.- - --. - -
- --- --- . . E-4
J:
7" 41 J
jJ-U -Ai 1-4 cu
-Ht: I
4: -14 11 -i! 4 i t I 1 11
_4
W- 0C',
2
----------
It
fit
t
tli t
4-j 1IL
M-jWTH I "ocLy qa
Page 24
'10
ID
LO L.) to
kn
4-) (n
=42- =Lz-l ------ --
0 C
2 CD "Cyv.---3 -
-4 -0 Ln so ---
CIJ 4) V) r-----4+-
0:) w -I*-ko C) T
I N I t
cr)< C:) 0 to
E
------------- 0
cu
------------- t
-------------
-MET -
Ci
----------
------ -------- 9
-4-
I M
4
4V -------------- -=--
lb'JW T. GAoqy q(l
Page 25
Fuel Consumption Average By Course, Vehicle No. NBO04A
1
Page 26
DEFICIENCIES AND SHORTCONINGS
1. Deficiencies
None
2. Shortcomings
Suggested Corrective
Shortcoming Action Remarks
Inclosure 2, nape 1
Unclassified
Security Classification
DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R & D -
(Security classificationof title. body of abstract and indexing annotation must be entered when the overall report to claseified)
I. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY (Corporate *Uthor) Ia. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
3- REPORT TITLE
Comparison Test of Truck, Utility, 1/4-Ton, 4X4, M151A2, USA Reg No. fB004A
Mfg Serial No. 26801.
4. DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (Type ol report and Inclusive dates)
W. H. Neff, Jr.
6. REPORT DATE 7a. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES j 0b. OF REFS
NO.
July 1973 36 I
8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Sa.IORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMERIS
IWE07-71-C-0103
b. PROJECT NO. APG MT-43li
TECCII Project No. 1 VG-120 151-067
Csb, OTHER REPORT NO(S) (Any other n mbers that may be assigned
this report)
None TAC(]
13. ABSTRACT
A comparison test of one truck, utility, i/-ton, xk, M151A2, was conducted by the
Materiel Testing Directorate at Aberdeen Proving Ground from 24 May to 2 July 1973.
Testing vas conducted in accordance with military specification NIL-T-0045331E.
Quality of workmnship at the time of manufacture was satisfactory. Vehicle
perfolnnce requirements vere met with the exception of radio interference suppression
and maximum speed requirements. Vehicle endurance was satisfactory, except the
lower right front suspension arm capserews Icosened, the upper radiator insulator
assembly fractured, and the right rear outboard suspension arm bushing was worn.
10V41473~
DD I-
row
, wOVeuI
8OT&FRAMU9t
KA9aRPLACE9S 00 FORM 1473. 1 JAN 5.WHIC1 I
OUSOLETE FronAMy US.o eUnclassified
Security Classification
Unclassified
Security Classification
4. LINK A LINK B LINK C
KIEV WORDS ROLE WT ROLE Wi' ROLE WT
Unclassified
security Classificetion