UNIVERSITY OF SAN JOSE-

RECOLETOS
COURSE SYLLABUS
SCHOOL OF LAW

Course Title: SPECIAL Instructress:

PROCEEDINGS
No. of Units: 2 units Atty. Brenda
L.Tangarorang
2ND
Semester/ SY: semester 2015
Department/Tr College of Law
ack:
Pre-requisites:

I. COURSE DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES

The Rules in Special Proceeding is part of Remedial or Procedural law.

These Rules govern proceedings in special cases mainly for the
purpose of establishing a right and status of a person,or merely to
establish a particular fact.

The Rules of Court identified fourteen(14) subject matters governed

by these rules. These 14 subject matters are set forth from Rules 73 to
108 of the Rules of Court. Noted are the amendatory laws on the
following rules of procedure: Rules 99 on Adoption and Rule 100 on
revocation of Adoption have been repealed by the passage of R.A
8552on Domestic Adoption Act and R.A. 8043 on Intercountry
Adoption while Rule 104 on voluntary dissolution of corporations have
been repealed by Section 19 of the Corporation Code of the
Philippines

Furthermore, Rule 105 on the procedure for judicial approval of

voluntary recognition of minor natural children and Rule 106 on the
procedure for the constitution of family home have been rendered
obsolete by the passage of the Family Code.

By virtue of these aforementioned amendatory laws, the subject

matters governed by the rules on Special proceedings have now been
reduced from fourteen(14) to ten(10) subject matters The procedures
applicable to these subject matters as enumerated in the rules of
court, as well as the governing laws, and applicable principles and
jurisprudential rulings in special proceedings cases and the
amendatory laws on adoption and other related amendments shall be
the principal focus of this course.

Upon completion of this course, students will be able to:a)gain

knowledge of the intricacies and procedural mechanics of court
litigation involving cases governed by rules of special
1/14
proceedings;.b)to know and understand the essential concepts and
applicability of the rules governing special proceedings in a
theoretical court litigation setting and;c)to gain skills and develop the
power of methodical thinking through case analysis and comparative
learning.

Methodology

The course will focus on lectures, oral recitations and group

discussions which shall be conducted in every session. Oral
recitations on assigned cases and case analysis shall also be
conducted on a regular basis in order to develop the students
ability to analyze and discern the theory of each case in line
with the study of procedural rules relative to special
proceedings. This is designed to develop the students skill and
power of deep thinking and analysis, reasoning and facility for
expression. Surprise quizzes and participatory academic
discussion will also be conducted to challenge their knowledge
of the assigned laws and stimulate their analytical mind and
develop their argumentative capability.

The course will also be taught through individual and group

reports, submission and discussion of written reports and
comparative analysis of cases assigned; interdisciplinary study
and participatory academic discussion; hypothetical cases-
problem solving and case reporting.

II. COURSE OUTLINE

Week/Sess Topic
ion
Week 1 I. SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS:GENERAL PROVISIONS.

A) Definition:Special Proceedings .
B) Distinction:Special Proceedings vis--vis Action( Criminal and Civil)
C) Nature of the proceedings
D) Jurisdiction and Venue

II.RULE 72:SUBJECT MATTERS AND APPLICABILITY

OF GENERAL RULES.

A) Article 2176 of the Civil Code.

2/14
 III.RULE 73:SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE OF DECEASED PERSONS.

A) ARTICLES 390,391,392( PRESUMPTION OF DEATH) OF THE CIVIL

CODE
B) Venue and Jurisdiction.
C) B.P. 129 as amended by R.A 7691.

Week 2 IV.RULE 74: SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE.

A) EXTRAJUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE BY AGREEMENT.

B) SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF SMALL VALUE.

V. RULE 75: PRODUCTION OF WILL.ALLOWANCE OF WILL

NECESSARY.

ADMINISTRATION; WHEN AND TO WHOM ISSUED.

Week 3 VI.RULE 76: ALLOWANCE OR DISALLOWANCE OF WILLS.

VII. RULE 77: ALLOWANCE OF WILL PROVED OUTSIDE OF THE

PHILIPPINES.

VIII. RULE 78:LETTERS TESTAMENTARY AND LETTERS OF

ADMINISTRATION; WHEN AND TO WHOM ISSUED.

Week 4 IX. RULE 79: ISSUANCE OF LETTERS TESTAMENTARY PETITION

AND CONTEST FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION.

X. RULE 80:SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR.

XI: RULE 81:BONDS OF EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATOR.

Week 5 XII. RULE 82:REVOCATION OF

ADMINISTRATION;DEATH,RESIGNATION AND REMOVAL OF
EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATOR.

XIII. RULE 83:INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL.

XIV. RULE 84:GENERAL POWERS AND DUTIES OF EXECUTORS

AND ADMINISTRATOR.

Week 6 XV. RULE 85:ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPENSATION OF

EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATOR.

XVI.RULE 86:CLAIMS AGAINST THE ESTATE.

Week 7 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION

Week 8 XVII:RULE 87:ACTIONS BY AND AGAINST THE EXECUTORS AND

ADMINISTRATOR.

XVIII:RULE 88:PAYMENT OF THE DEBTS OF THE ESTATE.

3/14
Week 9 XIX.RULE 89:SALES,MORTGAGES AND OTHER ENCUMBRANCES
OF PROPERTY OF DECEDENT.

XX.RULE 90:DISTRIBUTION AND PARTITION OF THE ESTATE

XXI.RULE 91:ESCHEAT.

Week 10 XXII. RULE 92: GENERAL GUARDIANS AND GUARDIANSHIP:

VENUE

A) RULE 93:APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIANS.

B) RULE 94:BONDS OF GUARDIANS.
Week 11 C) RULE 95:SELLING AND ENCUMBERING PROPERTY OF THE
WARD
D) RULE 96:GENERAL POWERS AND DUTIES OF GUARDIANS.
E) RULE 97:TERMINATION OF GUARDIANSHIP.

XXIII. RULE 98:TRUSTEES.

Week 12 MIDTERM EXAM

Week 13 XXIV: RULE 99:ADOPTION AND CUSTODY OF MINORS.

XXV: RULE 100: REVOCATION OF ADOPTION.

Week 14 XXVI: RULE 101:PROCEEDINGS FOR HOSPITALIZATION OF

INSANE PERSONS.

XXVII: RULE 102:HABEAS CORPUS.

Week 15 XXVIII: RULE 103:CHANGE OF NAME IN RELATION TO R.A. 9048.

XXX: RULE 108:CANCELLATION OR CORRECTION OF ENTRIES

IN THE CIVIL REGISTRY.IN RELATION TO R.A 9048

Week 16 XXIX: RULE 107:ABSENTEES.

Week 17 XXXI: APPEALS IN SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS.

Week 18 FINAL EXAMINATION

4/14
III. REFERENCES AND OTHER MATERIALS

Principal
References:

Topical Required Readings/Assignments

Refere
nce
Natcher vs. C.A.,366 SCRA 386(2001)
I.& II. Vda. De Manalo vs. C.A.,349 SCRA 135(2001)
Hagans vs.Wislezenus,45 Phil.880(1920)
Mangalinan vs. Gonzales,36 SCRA 462(1970)
Baybayan vs. Aquino,149 SCRA 185(1987)
Fernandez vs. Maravilla,10 SCRA589(1964).
Heirs of Teofilo Gabatan et.al vs. C.A.,G.R. No.
150206(March 13,2009)
Montaner vs. Shariah District Court, G.R. No.
174975(Jan. 20,2009)
Alfredo Hilado Lopez sugar Corp. vs. C.A.,G.R. No.
164108(May 8,2009)

Suggested readings: Articles 390,391,392 of the New

Civil Code.
Republic Act 7170; B.P. 129 as
amended by R.A. 7691; article 2176 of the NCC.

III.. Saludo vs. American Express ,G.R. No. 159507(April

19,2006)
Benatiro vs. Hrs.of Cuyos,560 SCRA 478
Maria Socorro Avelino vs. C.A.,G.R. No.
115181(March 31,2000)
Eusebio vs. Eusebio,100 Phil. 593.
Garcia Fule vs. C.A.,74 SCRA 189.
Roberts vs. Leonidas,129 SCRA 33.
Advincula vs. Teodoro,99 Phil. 413.
Phil. Savings Bank vs. Lantin,124 SCRA 483.
Utolo vs. Pasion de Garcia,66 Phil. 303.
Sampio vs. C.A.,103 Phil.71
Ongsingko vs. de Borja,97 Phil. 872.
5/14
 Cayetano vs.Leonides, L-54919(March 30,1994)
Republic vs. C.A.,205 SCRA 356.
Lao vs. C.A.,382SCRA 407.
Jimenez vs. IAC,G.R. No. 75773(April 17,1990)
Benedicto vs. Javellana,10 Phil. 197.
Gass vs. Fortich,54 Phil. 196.
Villacorte vs. Mariano,89 Phil. 343.
Periera vs. C.A.,G.R. No. 81147(June 20,1989)
Lukban vs. Republic,98 Phil.574(1956)
PCIB vs. Escolin,56 SCRA 266(1974)
Cuenco vs. C.A.,53 SCRA 360
Petition to approve the will of Ruperta
Palaganas,G.R. No 169144(Jan. 26,2011)

Comparative analysis: a)Nuguid vs. Nuguid, 17 SCRA

449 with the case of Sumilang vs. Ramagosa,21
SCRA 1369 and Cacho vs. Udan,13 SCRA 693.
b)Valera vs. Inserto, 149 SCRA 533 with the case of
Trinidad vs. C.A.,202 SCRA 106.
c)Roxas vs. Pecson,82 Phil 407 with the case of
Matias vs. Gonzales,101 Phil. 852.

IV. Alcala vs. Pabalan,19 Phil. 520

Utolo vs. vda. De Garcia,66 Phil. 302(1938)
Divina vs. C.A.,220 SCRA 597(1993)
Vda de Reyes vs. C.A.,199 SCRA 646
Asuncion vs. Dela Cruz,97 Phil. 910
Perez vs. Perez,105 Phil. 1132
De Castro vs. Ginete, 27 SCRA 623
Nielson & Co. vs.Lepanto Consolidated,18SCRA1040
Yusingco vs. Ong Ing Lian,27 SCRA 589
Villaluz vs. Neme,L-14676(Jan. 31,1963)
Torres vs. Torres,L-19064(Jan. 31,1964)
Hernandez vs. Andal,78 Phil.196(1947)
Arcillas vs. Montejo,26 SCRA 197(1968)
Jerez vs. Nietes,30 SCRA 905(1969)
Mc Micking vs. Sy Conbieng,21 Phil. 211

V. Felix Azuela vs. C.A.,G.R. No. 122880(March

12,2006)
Pacioles vs. Chuatoco-Ching,G.R. No 127920(August
9,2005)
Pascual vs. C.A.,409 SCRA 105
Manahan vs. Manahan,58 Phil. 448.
Estate of Johnsond,39 Phil. 156
De Villa vs. C.A.,414 SCRA 436
Pio Baretto Realty vs. C.A., 62431
Ongsingco vs. Tan,97 Phil. 330
Rodelas vs. Aranza,119 SCRA 16(1982)
6/14
 Gan vs. Yap,104 Phil. 509(1958)
Gago vs. Mamuyac,49 Phil. 902(1927)
Solivio vs. C.A.,182 SCRA 119(1990)
Rodriguez vs. Borja,17 SCRA 418(1966)
Teotico vs. del Val,13 SCRA 406(1965)
Basa vs. Mercado,61 Phil. 632(1935)
Balanay vs. Martinez,64 SCRA 452(1975)
Fernandez vs. Dimagiba,21 SCRA 428(1967)

Alaban vs. C.A.,G.R. No. 156021Sept. 23,1985)

VI.& .Cuenco vs. C.A.,53,SCRA 360.
VII. De Aranz vs. Galing,161 SCRA 628(1988)
Suntay vs. Suntay,95 Phil. 500(1954)
Castro vs. Martinez,10 Phil. 207
Basa vs. Mercado,61 Phil.632
Joson vs. Noble,87 Phil.337
Cabanag vs. Delfinado,34 Phil.291
Aldanese vs. Salutillo,47 Phil.548
Fluemer vs. HIX,54 Phil.610
Miciano vs. Brimo,50 Phil. 867
Leon and Ghezzi vs. Manufacturing Life Ins.,80 Phil.
495
Johannes vs. Harvey,43 Phil. 175

Leon vs Manufacturer Life Ins. Co.,90 Phil.459

VIII..&I Gonzales vs. Aguinaldo,190 SCRA 112(1990)
X. De Guzman vs. Limcolioc,68 Phil.673(1939)
Duran vs. Duran,20 SCRA379
De Guzman vs. Angeles,162 SCRA 347(1988)
Roxas vs. Pecson,82 Phil. 407(1948)
Luzon Surety vs. Quebral,127 SCRA 295(1984)
Lacson vs. Reyes,182 SCRA 729(1990)
Phil. Trust Co. vs. Luzon Surety,2 SCRA 122(1951)
Quirino vs. Gorospe,169 SCRA 702(1989)
Melgar vs. Buenviaje,179 SCRA 196(1989)
Velasquez vs. George,125 SCRA 456(1983)
Caro vs. C.A.,113 SCRA 10
Estate of Olave vs. Reyes,123 SCRA 767
Manaquil vs. Villegas,189 SCRA 335

Comparative analysis: Ventura vs. Ventura,160 SCRA

810 with the case of Villamor vs. C.A.,162 SCRA 574

Co vs. Rosario,G.R. 160671(April 30,2008)

X. Tan vs. GedorioJr.,G.R. No.166520
Pijuan vs. Vda de Guerren,L-21917(Nov. 29,1966)
Matias vs. Gonzales,1010 Phil.852

7/14
XI. Sison vs. Teodoro,100 Phil. 1055
Mendoza vs. Pacheco,64 Phil. 134
Phil. Trust Co. vs. Luzon SuretyCo.,L-13031

XII. Advincula vs. Teodoro,L-9282(May 31,1956)

Padilla vs. Jugo,64 Phil. 888
Del Rosario vs. Del Rosario,67 Phil. 652
Cabarrubias vs. Dizon,76 Phil. 209
De Borja vs. Tan,93 Phil. 167
Arevalo vs. Bustamante,69 Phil. 656
Oronce vs. Lapuz,69 Phil. 395

Comparative Analysis: a)Uriarte vs. CFI of Negros

Occ.,33 SCRA 252 with the case of Advincula vs.
Teodoro,99 Phil. 413 .
b)San Diego vs. Nombre er.al.,L-19265 with the case
of Caro vs. C.A.,113 SCRA 10

XIII. Bernardo vs. C.A.,L-18148(Feb. 28,1963)

XIV. Tambunting vs. San jose,96 Phil. 491

Chua Tan vs. dela Rosa,57 Phil. 411
Layongue vs.Perez de Ulgasan,L-13666(October
31,1966)
Fernandez vs. Tiu,22 Phil. 603
Buenaventura vs. Ramos,43 Phil. 704
Centenera vs.Sotto,78 Phil. 432
Litonjua vs.Montilla,90 Phil. 767
Saturnino vs. Paulino,L-7385
Nieva vs. Alcala, 41 Phil 915(May 19,1955)
Ferraria vs. Rosas,65 Phil. 732

Comparative analysis: Enriquez vs. Watson, 6 Phil.

834
with the case of Nombre & Escomlar, L-19265.

XV. Ocena vs. Marquez,60 SCRA 38

Gonzales vs. Orense, 163 SCRA 570
Dacanay vs. Hernandez,53 Phil. 824
Escueta vs. Sy-Juiliong,5 Phil. 505
Phil. Trust Co. vs. Luzon Surety Co.,L-13031(May
30,1961)

Comparative analysis: De Guzman vs. De Guzman

Carillo,83 SCRA 256 with the case of Kalaw vs.
IAC,G.R. 74618.

8/14
XVI. Tan Sen Guan vs. Go Sui San,47 Phil.89
Echaus vs. Blanco,G.R.30453(Dec.4,1989)
Estate of Olave vs. reyes,123 SCRA 767
Jacob vs. C.A.,G.R. No. 85914(April 6,1990)
Veloso vs. Heredia,33 Phil. 306
PNB. Vs C.A, G.R No. 121597(June 29,2001)
Go Tamco vs. Chang Seng,46 Phil. 542
Maclan vs. Garcia,L-7622(May 7,1955)
Santos vs. Manarang,27 Phil. 213
Paulin vs Aquino,103 Phil. 1143
Lopez vs. lopez,68 Phil. 227

Comparative analysis: a)Uytioco vs. Imperial,53 Phil.

802 with the case of Rodriguez vs.Ynza,97 Phil.
1003.
b)Reyes vs. Rosenstock,47
Phil. 784 with the case of BPI vs. Concepcion Hijos
Inc, 53 Phil. 784.
c)Bautista vs. Tiongson,11
Phil. 579 with the case of Albano vs. Agtarap,22 Phil.
345 .

XVII. Peneyra vs. IAC, G.R. No. 68935(January 25, 1990)

Abiera vs. Orin,8 Phil. 193
Limjuco vs. intestate estate of Flagrante,80 Phil. 776
Borromeo vs. Borromeo,98 Phil. 432
Changco vs. Madrilejos, 9 Phil. 356
Arcega vs. Pecson,78 Phil. 743
Ingersoll vs. Chiu Tuan Lay,11 Phil. 564
Pilapil vs. hrs. Maximo briones,514 SCRA 197(Feb.
2007)
Guy vs. C.A.,502 SCRA 151( Sepr.,2006)

XVIII. Benedicto vs. Javellana,10 Phil. 197

Buan vs. Laya,102 Phil. 682
Mendoza vs. Pacheco,64 Phil. 134
Govt. of P.I. vs. Pamintuan,55 Phil.13
Lopez vs. lopez,68 Phil. 227
Imperial vs Munoz,G.R.L.-30787(August 29,1974)
Gullas vs. CFI Pampanga,G.R.L-26695(Jan.31,1979)

Suggested readings: Articles 2241-2251 ,NCC

XIX. Ngo The Hua vs. Chung Kiat Kang, G.R.L-

&XX 17091(Sept. 30,1963)
Pimentel vs. Palanca,5 Phil.436
Ramos vs. Octuzar,89 Phil. 730
9/14
 Guilas vs. CFI Pampanga,43 SCRA 117
Solivio vs. C.A.,99 Phil.1069
Camia de Reyes vs. Reyes de Ilano,63 Phil.629

XXI. Republic vs. C.A,G.R. No. 143483

Republic vs. IAC,G.R. No. 73831(February 27,1987)
Municipality of San Pedro vs. Colegiuo de san
Jose,65 Phil.318
Gullas vs. PNB,62 Phil., 519
Republic vs. PNB,G.R.L-16196(Dec. 30,1961)
City of Manila vs.Archbishop of Manila,36 Phil. 815
Go Poco Grocery vs. Pacific Biscuit Co.,65 Phil. 443.
Balais Mabanag vs. RFegister of Deeds Quezon
City,G.R.No. 153142(March 29,2010)
Municipal Council of San Pedro vs.Colegio de san
jose,65 Phil. 318

XXII; Jose Uy vs. C.A.,G.R.No. 109557(Nov. 29,2000)

A;B;C;D; Hernandez et.al. vs.Santos,G.R.No.
E. 166470&169217(August 7,2009)
Cabales vs. C.A.,G.R. No. 162421(August 31,2007)
People vs. Flores,G.R. No. 188315(August 25,2010)
Nery et.al. vs. Lorenzo,L-23096 & 23376(April
27,1972)
Alamario vs. Pabale,G.R.No. 151243(April 30,2008)
Lopez vs. Teodoro,86 Phil. 499
Singco vs. Longa,51 Phil. 507
Joycelyn Gualbertovs. Crisanto
Gaulberto,G.R.No.156254(june 28,2005)
Paciente vs. Dacuycuy, L-58319(Jan. 29,1982)
Guerero vs. Dolojan, L-4613;90 Phil. 873
Yangco vs. City of Manila,29 Phil. 184
Guardianship of Jr.de Inchausto, 40 Phil.506
Manotoc vs. Smith,43 Phil. 301
Guerero vs. Teran,13 Phil. 212
Inton vs. Quintana,81 Phil. 97
Phil. Trust Co. vs. Roldan,99 Phil. 393
Sinco vs. Longa,51 Phil. 507
Polasca vs. Baguisi,38 Phil. 177
Gamboa vs. Lopez Vito,62 Phil 550
Guardianship of Maria exaltacion Castillo,64 Phil.
839
Viloria vs. Adm. Of Veterans Affair,101 Phil. 762
Jocson vs. Empire Ins. Co,103 Phil. 580
Salonga vs. Evangelista,20 Phil. 273
Cui vs. Piccio,L-5131(July 31,1952)
10/14
 Lichauco vs. Tan Pho,51 Phil. 862

XXIII OLao vs. Co Cho Chit,220 SCRA 656

Ceniza vs. C.A.,181 SCRA 552
Tolentino vs.Vitug,39 Phil.126

XXIV In re petition for adoption of Michael Jude Lim, G.R.

&XXV. No. 168992-93(May 21,2009)
DSWD vs. Judge Antonio Belen, A.M.RTV-96-1362(july
18,1997)
Anonymous vs. Emma Curamen,A.M. 2549(June
18,2010)
In the matter of Adoption of Stephanie Naty Garcia,454
SCRA 541

XXVI. Chin Ah Cho et.al. vs. Concepcion.,54 Phil.775,780-781

XXVII. Flores vs. Cruz,52 O.G.5112

Lee Yick Han vs. Collector of Custom,41 Phil. 548
Talabon vs. Iloilo Provincial Warden,78 Phil. 599
Villavicencio vs. Lukban,39 Phil. 778
Petition for Habaes Corpus of Cezario Gonzales et.al.
vs.Gen. Efren Abu,G.R. 1709249 (july 4,2007)
LeeYick vs. Insular Collector of Customs,41 Phil. 548
Noel Bagtas vs. Hon. Ruth Santos, G.R. No.
166682( November 11,2009)
Go vs. Ramos,G.R. No. 167569(October 4 ,2009)
De Joya vs. Jail warden of Batangas City,417 SCRA 636

Cases On Amparo:

Lourdes Rubio et.al. vs. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo et.al.,

G.R. NO. 871(Feb. 18,2010)
Rev. Fr. Robert Reyes vs. C.A.,Sec Raul Gonzales,G.R
11/14
 No. 182161(Dec. 13,2009)
Daniel Masangkay Lapuz etal.., G.R. No. 182484 (June
17,2008)
Sec. of Natl. Defense vs. Raymund Reynaldo Manalo,
G.R. No. 180906(Oct.7,2008)
In the matter of petition for the writ of amparo of
Melissa C. Roxas and writ of Habeas data, G.R. No.
189155(Sept. 7,2010)

XXVIII Comparative Analysis:

.
ROMMEL JACINTO DANTES SILVERIO VS.
REPUBLIC,G.R. No.174689(Oct.22,2007) with the case
of REPUBLIC VS. JENNIFER B. CAGANDAHAN, G.R.
No. 1666676(September 12, 2008)

Republic vs. Capote, G.R. No. 157043(Feb. 2,2007)

Petition for Change of Name/Correction of entry of
Julian Lim Wang vs. Cebu City Civil Registrar, G.R. No.
159966(march 30,2005)
Republic vs. Roselie Eloisa Bolante,G.R. No.
160597(July 20,2006)

XXIX. Reyes vs. Alejandro, L-32026 (Jan 16 1986)

XXX. Republic vs. Labrador,G.R. No. 132980(March 25,1999)

Republic vs.Carlito Michael Kho, G.R No. 170340(June
29,2007)
LEE vs. C.A., G.R No. 118387(Oct. 11,2001)
Matias vs. Republic, L-26980(May 8,1969)
Republic vs. Bautista, L-35316(Oct. 26,1987)
Republic vs. JulianEdward Magpayo, G.R. No.
189476(Feb 2,2011)
Corpus vs. Sto. Tomas, G.R. No. 186571(August
11,2010)
Republic vs. Mercadera, G.R. No. 186027(Dec. 8,2010)

XXXI. Quasha Anchet Pena et. al. vs. LCV Construction

Corp.,G.R. No. 174873(August 26,2008)

IV. COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND GRADING SYSTEM

12/14
Course Grade Description
Requireme Breakdown
nts
Oral 7% Recitation conducted on assigned
recitation legal provisions and cases and
related laws..Students who are late
or absent when called for recitation
will get a grade of 5.0..
Su1rprise 10% Unannounced quizzes will be given
quizzes from time to time.
15% Students will be required to submit
Written case analysis and written reports on
reports comparative discussion of two or
more cases assigned
.

Prelim Exam 25% .

Midterm 25% .
Exam

Final Exam 25% .

V. COURSE POLICIES

The use of electronic device is permissible during lecture and

class discussion but not during examination. The use of
cellphones and other electronic devices like IPADare prohibited
during the exam.

For other course policies please see the Rules and Regulations
on attendance,dress code,discipline,J.D. scholastic
responsibility, and plagiarism, in the ALS Catalogue. In
addition, all written paper requirements should first pass
through the plagiarism checker, available at the APS library,
prior to submission.

VI.CONTACT AND OTHER INFORMATION

13/14
 The instructor is available for communication through my email
address: firecracker403@yahoo.com or through my office number
2537698.

NOTE: THE PROFESSOR RESERVES THE OPTION OF AMENDING

THE READING LIST, ASSIGNED CASES AND ASSIGNMENTS.

14/14