Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ABSTRACT
Despite the multiple significances of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) for the economic
development in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), the support of authorities is still missing. The
circumstances that have negatively affected on the development of SMEs in BiH are
numerous: lack of unified legal framework; failure to recognize the significance of
development of SMEs; slowness in the processes of economic transition and privatization; the
post-war emphasis on efforts to revitalize large enterprises with incidental ignorance for the
SMEs. It is relevant to mention that there are two official definitions of SMEs in BiH, one
applied in the Republic of Srpska and the other one being used in the Federation of Bosnia
and Herzegovina. Existence of multiple levels of authority in BiH (state, entity, canton and
municipality) contributed to establishment of a complex legal framework. Furthermore, this
system sometimes causes not only overlaps in jurisdiction and applicability of laws, but also
conflicting legal regulations. Apart from that, it frequently happens that the efforts for
development of entrepreneurship include persons that do not have adequate experience,
competencies and readiness to be instrumental in the development of SMEs. In this analysis
will be elaborate on fundamental problems in the development of SMEs in BiH, and the effort
to identify solutions to the problem of lack of systematic and institutional support in the
development of SMEs. Aim of this paper is to present a proposal for structuring of
relationships between institutions in BiH in order to facilitate effective support to growth and
development of SMEs in BiH.
1 INTRODUCTION
The process of transition in Bosnia and Herzegovina produced significant changes in creation
and establishment of the private sector, with emphasis on the relevance of development of
entrepreneurship and SMEs. The significance of the small and medium enterprises for Bosnia
and Herzegovina is multiple:
1. All of the following emphasize the core significance of SMEs for recovery and
development of Bosnia and Herzegovina: General framework of the economic strategy
for development (1999), Mid-term development strategy of BiH (2004), other cantonal
strategies, signing of the European Charter for small and medium enterprises.
2. According to the last OECD report, the SMEs in BiH constitute the backbone of the
economy, producing over 60% of the GDP and most of the new jobs (OECD, 2005, p.
30).
3. According to the Statistical business register (published by the Statistics Agency of
BiH as the first register of this kind in BiH), SMEs constitute 99.1% of all the active
enterprises in BiH.
1438
4. SMEs are also in focus of the strategies of EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development) for the period 20102013.
5. Along with the EBRD, the World Bank is also actively involved in supporting the
growth and development of the SMEs in BiH.
However, despite the multiple significances of the SMEs for the development of BiH, the
systematic and institutional support to the development of the SMEs is still lacking.
Even all the listed documents analyze different categories. E.g., the Statistical business
register provides data for all the enterprises in BiH (although only 0,9% have over 250
employees) but the trades are not included. The project of the Federal Ministry of
Development, Entrepreneurship and Trade considers only SMEs including trades.
Nevertheless, the most recent information are provided in the Statistical business register.
Along with the listed problems with inadequate statistical support, the closely-related problem
of grey economy is also causing difficulties in determination of the state of SMEs in BiH.
1439
enterprises, as opposed to the interest rates for their regular clients, and the banks name higher
risk rate as the reason for this practice. The crediting terms are especially difficult for the
entrepreneurs beginners. On the other hand, over the past couple of years, the micro-credit
organizations have been approving loans for the SMEs, particularly trades. However, the
fundamental problem is that such credits are expensive (high interest rates). Absence of more
acceptable terms of financing frequently represents the main hindrance in the business
operations of SMEs.
The example of Macedonia can be used as a confirmation for the said claims. The table below
provides a comparative illustration of progress made in BiH compared to Macedonia (as a
similar country in transition, with positive improvements) in the procedures for registration of
enterprises and business start-up:
Table 1: Starting a Business, Comparison of BiH with FYR Macedonia (World Bank, 2010
and 2012)
1440
2009 is as follows: BiH did not achieve progress in any out of ten areas that were included in
the research (Entrepreneurship education and training, Cheaper and faster start-up, Better
legislation and regulation, Availability of skills, Improving online access, Getting more out of
the Single Market, Taxation-Access to finance, Strengthening the technological capacity of
small enterprises, E-business and Developing stronger and more effective representation of
small enterprises interests). Each of the ten areas remained at the level of 2009, i.e. 2007. The
report for 2009 addresses the area of business start-up with particular criticism, providing the
following conclusion: BiH is the only country in the Western Balkans that is not
implementing a systematic reform in the processes of registration of enterprises. Also, in the
subject of e-business i e-governance: BiH is the weakest of all the countries included in the
research(OECD, 2009, pp. 202205).
1441
House of Reps BiH House of Peoples BiH
S 42 delegates 15 delegates; 5 Bosniaks, 5
T 28 elected in FBiH Croats (from the House of
A 14 elected in RS Peoples of FBiH) 5 Serbs from
T Peoples Assembly of RS
E Presidency BiH
1 Bosniak, 1 Croat (elected in FBiH), Council of Ministers BiH
President and 9 Ministers
1 Serb (elected in RS), rotating the
position of the chairman
ENTITY
House of Peoples Peoples Assembly RS
House of Reps FBiH FBiH - 58 delegates;
17 Bosniaks, 17
83 delegates
98 delegates
Croats, 7 others
delegated from
Cantonal Assemblies
Council of
Peoples
Clubs of 8 Bosniaks, 8
Bosniaks, Croats, 8 Serbs
Croats/Serbs 1 Presidency RS
candidate each President and 2
vice-Presidents Government RS
16 Ministries, 5
Government Bosniaks, 5
FBiH Presidency FBiH Croats, 8 Serbs
16 Ministries President and 2 vice-
8 Bosniaks, 5 Presidents, 1 Bosniak, 1
Croats, 5 Croat, 1 Serb
Serbs
CANTON 10 Cantonal
(only FBiH) Assemblies
The schematic layout clearly illustrates the complexity of the decision-making process at the
state level, that is based on a complex system of leverage, constructed to protect the interests
the three constitutional peoples (Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs). Furthermore, those are the
peoples that were in a war against each other not so long ago. An additional complication is
1442
the political stage dominated by ethnic political parties. Under the disguise of protection of
national interests any serious engagement in solving of the economic problems is still
missing, and the same applies when speaking of any serious approaches to stimulation of
development of SMEs in BiH.
Bosnia and Herzegovina lacks the necessary legal and institutional framework of state-level
support for the development of SMEs. Such framework should include the following: Law on
SMEs, Strategy of Development of SMEs, Agency for SMEs and a Fund for SMEs. From the
listed elements, BiH only has the Strategy of Development of SMEs that was adopted only in
2009 although the first proposal was prepared in 2005. This is to say that despite the evident
multiple significance of development of SMEs, the support of the government is still lacking.
Lack of a universal legal framework, failure to recognize the significance of development of
SMEs, slowness in the process of economic transition, post-war emphasis and efforts on
revival of large enterprises while ignoring SMEs all those are circumstances that have
negatively affected development of SMEs in BiH. For eventual acceptance of SMEs as an
element in the development of the country, a credit is to be given to the influence of
international institutions and successful accomplishments of domestic entrepreneurs.
At the level of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the sector of SMEs is governed by the Ministry of
Foreign Trade and Economic Relations. Within that Ministry exists a Sector for economic
Development and Entrepreneurship that includes a special Department for Entrepreneurship.
Competencies for SMEs in FBiH are governed by the Law on Incitement of Development of
Small Entrepreneurship (Official Gazette FBiH, No. 19/06). According to that Law, the
parties charged with program of development of SMEs are:
1. Government of FBiH and Cantonal governments
2. Federal Ministry of Development, Entrepreneurship and Trade
3. Respective Federal and Cantonal ministries and institutions, and
4. Local self-governance units
At the level of FBiH the problems of SMEs are in the jurisdiction of the Federal Ministry of
Development, Entrepreneurship and Trade. At the Cantonal level (only in FBiH) the bodies
that perform professional and administrative services, also relevant for the SMEs, are in the
jurisdiction of respective Ministries of Economy, with the following exceptions:
1. Posavina Canton Ministry of Economy and Physical Planning.
2. Tuzla Canton Ministry of Development and Entrepreneurship (Department for
entrepreneurship and trade), Ministry of Reconstruction, Development and Return
(development and incitement of entrepreneurship, especially trades), and the Ministry
of Commerce, Tourism and Traffic (Department for Commerce and Tourism).
In the RS, within the Ministry of Industry, Energy and Mining, there is an Assistant to the
Minister responsible for development of SMEs and entrepreneurship. At the lower
administrative levels (municipalities) there are also departments or persons responsible for
promotion, growth and development of the SMEs.
Nevertheless, without a universal state-level legal framework, this enormous and frequently
contradictory system of competencies and responsibilities of institutions can hardly contribute
to the development of entrepreneurship and the SMEs. Also, it occurs rather frequently that
1443
any efforts for the development of the SMEs involve individuals without adequate experience,
competencies and readiness to assist the process of development of the SMEs.
However, with consideration for the proposals outlined in the Strategy of Development of
SMEs in BiH 20092011 and the existing structure of legislative and executive authorities in
BiH, the authors proposes the following schematic layout of institutional relationships:
Business-Innovation
STRATEGIC LEVEL
Fund for
Center of Bosnia and Ministry of Foreign Commerce and Economic
Development of
Herzegovina Relations Council for development of SMEs
SMEs in BiH
RS FBiH
Minister's Assistant Minister's Assistant
for the SMEs for the SMEs Chambers of
Economy
Entitety Agencies Chambers of Trades
for development of and Crafts
Sectoral Associations
SMEs
Cantonal Ministries of
Economy
Minister's Assistant for
the SMEs
Municipalities
Offices for support to SMEs
The central position in the schematic layout is given to the Agency for Development of SMEs
in BiH that should be responsible for strategies, plans (especially the urgent adoption of a an
action plan for development of SMEs in BiH), but also lobbying for adoption and
implementation of laws that concern development of the SMEs at the state level (especially
1444
the Law on SMEs, and the Law on State Aid). Particular start-up efforts the Agency should
make in the processes of registration of enterprises (taking a positive example of a successful
reform implemented in Albania). A strategic level of support for the development of SMEs in
BiH is required for the two main reasons:
1. Bosnia and Herzegovina still does not dispose with a significant, or even the required
capacities for a strong development of SMEs
2. Taking into consideration the said circumstances in BiH, the ongoing process of
globalization, and the openness of economy of this country; Bosnia and Herzegovina
must not allow the luxury of dispersion of knowledge, capital and evidently
expensive business.
So, the Agency would represent a key institution in development of the SMEs in BiH. The
Agency would make strategic plans on distribution of financial support for the SMEs (with
particular consideration for the types of business), which would ensure to avoid the practices
of lump-sum support and uncoordinated support. The Law on State Aid should serve as a
basis for a transparent distribution of financial incentives to the enterprises. The Agency
would be responsible to the Government of BiH, i.e. directly to the Ministry of Foreign
Commerce and Economic Relations.
The Council for Development and Entrepreneurship of SMEs, within the Ministry, monitors
and supervises the work of the Agency, collects information from respective entity and
cantonal ministries. The Council would have a rather coordinating role between the ministries
and the Agency.
Business Innovation center of BiH should be established by the Government of BiH. The
Center would have a central role in development and promotion of innovation and
technical/technology system. The primary goal of the Center should be incitement of
innovations, recognizing potentials in inovative ideas, and support to materialization of those
ideas. The Center would also be in charge of the EU funds.
Entity agencies for development of the SMEs would be responsible for implementation of
measures associated with provision of business services, trainings, educations, etc., in
accordance with the plans prepared by the Agency for MSE in BiH. Entity agencies would
cooperate directly with universities and secondary schools, with the primary aim of promotion
of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial spirit in those institutions. Also, they would take on
the commitment to participate in the financing of education of entrepreneurs.
The primary task of the Fund for Development of SMEs should be financial mediation, and
support to entrepreneurs to overcome difficulties associated with liquidity, and facilitating
easier access to funding for development of SMEs (primarily beginners).
In that way, the established Network for business development (the network of support to
development of SMEs) would also function efficiently and at its full capacity.
The proposed scheme of institutional relationships would resolve the obligation of the two-
way vertical coordination between all the levels of authority in BiH, and also the necessary
horizontal coordination and collaboration at the entity level. Such created support mechanism
should result in creation of entrepreneurial climate where the entrepreneurial initiative will be
rewarded, appreciated and spurred, in ways that will provide incentives and the necessary
1445
skills to the entrepreneurs, and also promote awareness of advantages and benefits of
entrepreneurship. The ultimate goal of the proposed institutional relationships would be to
awaken the sleepy attitude of BiH towards private initiatives, bearing in mind the fact that one
part of the countrys legislation and citizens mindset rests on models inherited from former
Yugoslavia, i.e. the former system of socialism. The goal will be achieved when the
entrepreneurial ideas and undertakings receive support and become fully recognized as
generators of absolutely required new jobs, investment and innovations in Bosnia and
Herzegovina.
4 CONSLUSION
Bosnia and Herzegovina is a country consisting of two entities, Federation of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, and the Republic of Srpska, and Brcko District as a special territorial unit. BiH
is a relatively small country in the region with open economy. The process of transition in
BiH (with the ultimate goal of democratization and development of Western-European type of
market economy) represents a rather difficult path for this country followed by series of
problems such as: inappropriately implemented privatization; split markets and diversified
legal regulations; insufficient development of the financial market; lack of universal
implementation of crucial economic reforms. An additional aggravating circumstance is the
complexity and mutual conditional relationships between legislative and executive authorities
in BiH. In such a tangled network of relationships, unscrupulous and arrogant politicians,
working under the disguise of protection of vital national interests, any serious engagements
in solving of the burning economic problems yet remain to be seen. Also, regardless of the
multiple significances of the SMEs, the system of incitement for development of the SMEs
sector in BiH is almost non-existent in the true sense of the word. The necessary legal and
institutional state-level framework for support to the development of the SMEs does not exist.
5 BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Competitiveness of the 2011-2012th Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2011). Sarajevo: Federal
development planning institution. Retrieved 10.05.2012 from
http://www.fzzpr.gov.ba/upload/file/dokumenti/drugi_o_nama/konkurentnost_BiH_2011.
pdf.
2. Enterprise Policy Performance Assessment Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2005). Paris:
OECD. Retrieved 09.04.2010 from
http://www.oecd.org/countries/bosniaandherzegovina/35313064.pdf.
3. OECD. (2009). SME Policy Index 2009, Progress in the Implementation of the European
Charter for Small Enterprises in the Western Balkans. Retrieved 05.11.2010 from
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/international/files/2009_charter_report_en.pdf.
1446
4. Official Gazette FBiH, No. 19/06.
5. Strategy for Bosnia and Herzegovina 20102013. (2010). Retrieved 10.08.2011 from
http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/country/strategy/bosnia_l.pdf.
6. Strategy of Development of SMEs in BiH 20092011. (2009). Retrieved 01.09.2012 from
http://www.sme.ba/images/dokumenta/strategija%20msp%20bih.pdf.
1447
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.