Betsy DeVos wants school choice. Chile tried that already. - The Washi... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/01/17/bet...

A confirmation hearing for Betsy DeVos, President-elect Donald Trumps nominee for education secretary, begins in the
Senate on Tuesday. DeVos is known as an advocate for school choice, which means she has pushed for charter schools and
voucher programs that use public funds to finance privately run schools.

Her support for school choice is controversial, not least because the efficacy of charter schools and vouchers is hotly
debated. Supporters of school choice argue a couple of things: first, that it gives students who live in underperforming school
districts a chance to go to good schools; and second, that by fostering competition between public and private schools, it
pushes both toward excellence and efficiency. Critics insist that such programs drain funds from public schools.

Only a limited amount of U.S. data speaks to this debate. But a large-scale, countrywide experiment in school vouchers has
taken place in Chile. And Chile offers an instructive and cautionary tale about how school vouchers affect education.

How Chiles school voucher system works

Chile has one of the worlds purest examples of a voucherized education system , established by the dictator Augusto Pinochet
in 1980. The state guarantees a certain amount of money for each students education. These funds can be used in a public or
private school.

Vouchers were introduced in Chile by free-market economists whose vision was similar to that of DeVos. When this vision
held sway, from 1980-1990, public spending on education was cut essentially in half from 5 percent to 2.5 percent of gross
domestic product. The state did relatively little to regulate the private schools that took vouchers.

After Chile returned to democracy in 1990, a series of center-left governments increased spending on education. This gave
public schools more funding. But some schools continue to struggle with operating costs particularly schools in poor

1 de 5 19-01-2017 12:32
Betsy DeVos wants school choice. Chile tried that already. - The Washi... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/01/17/bet...

neighborhoods, schools that serve high-risk students, and schools with low enrollments. Since vouchers were introduced,
public school enrollment has continued to decline. In 1981, 78 percent of students attended a public school. In 2013, 39
percent did.

How Chiles system affected education

Lower-income students are less likely to attend a voucher school in Chile. In 2006, for example, 42 percent of students in the
lowest income quintile attended a public school. Compare that with only 28 percent of students from the second-lowest
quintile and 4 percent from the wealthiest quintile of the population. Poorer students face barriers to using vouchers
including co-payments and difficulties with transportation. At least 63 of the countrys 345 municipalities do not have a
voucher school option. These districts are mostly rural and poor.

After more than three decades, only mixed evidence supports the idea that Chiles voucher system has improved student
achievement. A few studies suggest that private schools that take voucher students have better test scores than public schools.
Others find that this is mostly because private schools tend to admit more motivated and better-prepared students.

Until 2015, private voucher schools could limit which students could attend, thus cherry-picking the ones they thought would
perform best. Unsurprisingly, then, any differences in test scores between public and private schools disappear after
controlling for socioeconomic status.

The voucher system also widens the achievement gap between the haves and the have-nots. The aggregate socioeconomic
status of a school more strongly predicts test-score achievement in voucher schools than it does in public schools. This
suggests that voucher schools fail to level the playing field. Instead, the voucher system has aggravated Chiles high levels of
inequality.

Chiles backlash against vouchers

The voucher system has recently sparked a public backlash. Between 2006-2011, high school and university students took to
the street to protest the poor quality of public education. But efforts to improve public education and regulate voucher schools
have often been stymied by proponents.

A 1995 change that mandated an extended school day for all children thereby ensuring that public and voucher school
students had similar in-class time as children attending tuition-paying private schools met opposition from voucher schools
because of the associated costs. To overcome the resistance, politicians agreed to use public funds to finance improvements to
voucher school infrastructure. In some cases, that meant delaying similar improvements in public schools.

Meanwhile, private schools and right-wing parties blocked a proposed 2009 change that would have struck down any
admissions criteria for schools using public funds including private schools that took vouchers. Only in 2015, after waves of
intense protest, was President Michelle Bachelet able to pass a bill that outlawed admissions criteria for voucher schools and
increased public regulation and oversight of schools using public funds.

2 de 5 19-01-2017 12:32
Betsy DeVos wants school choice. Chile tried that already. - The Washi... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/01/17/bet...

What about in the United States?

Of course, Chile differs from the United States in many ways. But 14 U.S. states have large-scale voucher programs and other
policies that use public funds to send students to private schools. And the evidence from these systems is similar.

As in Chile, U.S. school choice programs can end up reinforcing class and race inequalities unless closely monitored. When
schools are monitored, school choice has increased racial integration in schools in highly segregated areas.

But in two cities with prominent school choice programs Milwaukee and Cleveland these programs did not always serve
the neediest students. The growth of vouchers coincided with the growth of white students using public funds. And in one
study of Clevelands program, the students who did not use vouchers were poorer and more likely to be nonwhite than
students who did use them. This resembles Chiles pattern.

U.S. voucher systems can also exclude students with special needs. Federal law requires public schools to serve students with
disabilities, but some states with choice programs allow participating private schools to reject students with disabilities. Even
when serving a student body that is racially and socioeconomically comparable to the public school population, charter schools
enroll a lower share of special-needs students than the surrounding public schools.

How does school choice affect student achievement? Much of what we know is based on studies of Milwaukee, Cleveland and
Florida, which have the longest-running programs in the United States. In general, as in Chile, evidence is mixed. Conclusions
depend strongly on researchers methodological choices and the think tank or research organization with which they are
affiliated.

For example, one study of Florida schools concluded that failing schools improved when vouchers let students go elsewhere.
But another researcher who examined the same schools but used different methods could not replicate the results.

Peer-reviewed studies are considered the most rigorous evaluations of vouchers, but these are few. Although some studies
found that students using vouchers had higher test scores than their public school peers, in general, peer-reviewed studies
found that the performance of voucher students does not differ significantly from that of public school students.

A major shortcoming of voucher evaluations is that they cannot identify the reason that vouchers work. For instance, a study
of Dayton, Ohio, schools found that vouchers had a small positive impact on some but not all students academic
achievement. For instance, African American students test scores went up, but the scores of whites and Latinos did not.
Another study of Milwaukee found that vouchers were associated with higher scores in math but had no impact on reading
scores.

3 de 5 19-01-2017 12:32
Betsy DeVos wants school choice. Chile tried that already. - The Washi... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/01/17/bet...

Why would the same voucher program be effective for some, but not all, racial groups or academic subjects? Without
understanding how vouchers work, it is difficult to say whether a program that works in one place would work in a different
setting or on a larger scale.

Overall, peer-reviewed research in the United States has found that vouchers have had little, if any, effect on student academic
performance or education quality in public schools competing with private voucher schools. Only a few places, however, have
used vouchers, making Chiles fully voucherized school system a cautionary tale for American reformers.

In Chile, the voucher system has not improved education opportunities for many poor or rural children. Rather, it has
increased socioeconomic inequalities and provoked discontent and protest.

Jennifer L. Erkulwater is associate professor of political science at the University of Richmond, and has written extensively
on U.S. social welfare politics and policy.

Jennifer Pribble is associate professor of political science and international studies at the University of Richmond, and
author of Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America .

Recommended by

How 2 Boston Grads Are Last Minute Cruise Deals Are Shark Tank" Star's Brilliant Tip
Disrupting a $19 Billion Industry Right Here On Paying Off Mortgage

4 de 5 19-01-2017 12:32
Betsy DeVos wants school choice. Chile tried that already. - The Washi... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/01/17/bet...

2017 - The Hearing Aid of the Comparing BI vendors? Don't Enjoy a "Reagan Retirement"
future is here! go into the fray unarmed. Get Thanks to Little-Known Tax
your 2017 BI Buyer's Guide now. Loophole

5 de 5 19-01-2017 12:32