Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract: Current direct techniques for moisture determination in dryers are off-line (Karl Fischer, LOD)
and require stopping the drying process to remove samples, which significantly increase cycle times.
Manually collected samples are susceptible to changes in physical conditions like humidity and
segregation, which will lead to inaccurate moisture analysis. Samples typically are withdrawn from the
fluid bed with a thief during processing and analyzed off-line in a laboratory for moisture content.
Commonly there is a delay before analysis results are available to the operator that causes processing
decisions, like end-point determination, to be made without optimal product moisture information. NIR
(Near infrared) spectroscopy can be a used to determine moisture content in fluid bed drying operations
accurately, on-line and in real time. NIRS is safe, non-invasive and requires minimal operator
involvement. NIRS provides information on the process, both physical and chemical, while it is going on.
This provides the ability to monitor critical parameters, and end-point is determined when the desired
state is achieved. Knowing exactly when a dryer has reached its endpoint will save companies energy,
eliminate the destruction of product due to over-drying, and increase the overall efficiency of the drying
process. Over or under drying of granules can be avoided thoroughly. NIR fits in well with the Process
Analytical Technology (PAT) initiative as developed by FDA.
Keywords: LOD (loss on drying), NIRS (Near infrared spectroscopy), Fluid bed dryer, moisture
measurement.
Dryer: It is an assembly of equipments used for removal of moisture from solids by evaporation.
Drying is defined as the removal of small amounts of water or other liquid from a material by the
application of heat.
Fluid bed dryers are found throughout all industries, from heavy mining through food, fine chemicals and
pharmaceuticals. They provide an effective method of drying relatively free flowing particles with a
reasonably narrow particle size distribution. In general, fluid bed dryers operate on a through-the-bed
flow pattern with the gas passing through the product perpendicular to the direction of travel. The dry
product is discharged from the same section.
Principle of operation FBD:
The required volume of air is produced by means of high capacity statically and dynamically balanced
fan. The fresh air is passed through Pre-Filter which removes traces of impurities from air. The purified
air is heated by means of electrical/steam heaters. The temperature of air is controlled by means of
digital temperature indicator-cum-controller. The hot air passes through the product container. The air is
passed from the bottom of the container, which has got perforations and S.S. fine mesh. Due to the air
stream the wet product gets fluidized and as the material is surrounded by hot air in fluidization chamber
its gets quickly & uniformly dried, due to rapid heat transfer. The moist air passes through Air Discharge
Bag to exhaust duct. A typical Dry Process involves the following steps:
With the sample taken out from the bowl an operator used to measure the moisture value in LOD (loss
on drying) instrument. LOD can measure the value of moisture in the granule. How much moisture left in
the product is known by LOD device.
Based on the moisture value given by LOD, operator restarts the FBD machine. After some time based
on assumption operator turns off the FBD & remove the product. He finally used to measure the value of
moisture in the product & enters moisture value in log sheet.
In this method, wet slab of material of sufficient high moisture content to be dried is placed in a tray
whose bottom & sides are insulated. The air is blown over the solid under constant drying conditions (air
velocity, temperature, humidity, pressure are maintained constant). The superficial water diffuses
through the surrounding stationary air film & is carried away rapidly by the moving air stream.
Periodically the slab is weighed. The weights of successive periods gives the loss of moisture content
i.e. amount of dried. The moisture present in the solid can be expressed on a wet weight or dry weight
basis. Then the following calculations are made.
Loss on drying % (LOD) = mass of water in sample in kg / total mass of wet sample kg *100 %
Drying rate = weight of water in sample kg / time in hr./ weight of dry solid kg.
NIR (Near infrared) spectroscopy can be a used to determine moisture content in fluid bed drying
operations accurately, on-line and in real time. NIRS is safe, non-invasive and requires minimal operator
involvement. NIRS provides information on the process, both physical and chemical, while it is going on.
This provides the ability to monitor critical parameters, and end-point is determined when the desired
state is achieved. Knowing exactly when a dryer has reached its endpoint will save companies energy,
eliminate the destruction of product due to over-drying, and increase the overall efficiency of the drying
process. Over or under drying of granules can be avoided thoroughly.
Introduction of Near Infrared Spectroscopy:
Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is a rapid non-destructive technique often used for in-process analysis
of moisture in the manufacturing environment. Real-time measurements can be made with no sample
preparation and the data can be analyzed and stored automatically. NIR fits in well with the Process
Analytical Technology (PAT) initiative as developed by FDA. One of the elements of the PAT initiative is
to use in-line analysis to increase process understanding and control to verify product quality and
release it for subsequent processing without delay. Using NIR, the process can be monitored for residual
moisture and yield better process control and end-point determination.
Definition of NIRS:
Near-infrared spectroscopy is the measurement of the wavelength and intensity of absorption of near-
infrared light by a sample. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a spectroscopic method that uses the
near-infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum (from about 800 nm to 2500 nm). Typical
applications include pharmaceutical, medical diagnostics (including blood sugar and oximetry), food and
agrochemical quality control, as well as combustion research.
Wavelength in nanometer
Infrared energy is the electromagnetic energy of molecular vibration. Molecules have several common
quantized vibration and rotation states that can occur separately or in combination. A molecule with an
electric dipole moment can go through one or more transitions between various vibro-rotational states, if
enough electromagnetic radiation at a specific frequency is absorbed by the molecule. The energy levels
of different vibration and rotation states are quantized, and energy levels can be determined using the
following equation:
Where:
These transitions can occur with high probability for n equal to 1, whereas such absorption is referred to
as fundamental absorption when n=1 or overtone when n=2, 3, 4 …m. respectively. The electromagnetic
radiation absorbed for vibration state changes are in the infrared region, while NIR spectroscopy
utilizes absorption bands whose absorption is mostly due to overtones. NIR instruments can usually
operate with electromagnetic radiation wavelengths between 700 nm and 2500 nm.
The molecular overtone and combination bands seen in the near IR are typically very broad, leading to
complex spectra; it can be difficult to assign specific features to specific chemical components.
Multivariate (multiple wavelength) calibration techniques (e.g., principal components analysis, partial
least squares, or artificial neural networks) are often employed to extract the desired chemical
information. Careful development of a set of calibration samples and application of multivariate
calibration techniques is essential for near-infrared analytical methods.
NIR instrumentation:
In a typical NIRS measurement application there are four basic parts to the measurement system:
The illumination unit provides the light, which is then led to the sample interface in some way, for
example by the use of mirrors or by using fiber-optics. The illumination optics of the sample interface
focuses the light on the sample, and the transmitted or scattered light is then collected with the collection
optics of the sample interface. The detection unit converts the collected radiation into an electrical signal.
In a spectroscopic measurement, the dispersive component has to be included in some point of the
illumination - sample interface - detection chain.
The operation principle of a spectral camera.
NIR reflectance instruments have detectors that measure the intensity of the NIR radiation that is
reflected from the sample at several key wavelengths. The actual constituent contents can be analyzed
and calculated based on the calibration equation, given the reflectance at the key wavelengths.
However, NIR transmission instruments measure the intensity of NIR radiation transmitted through a
sample at several key wavelengths. A calibration equation is then created to relate “log of reflectance”
values at several key wavelengths to the actual constituent fractional content values, usually done by
comparing with wet chemistry analysis from a standard sample set using a primary reference method.
Since NIR transmission instruments measure the NIR portion of the electromagnetic radiation that is
actually transmitted through the sample, the path length needs to be kept constant, and also selected for
a high signal-to-noise ratio. NIR spectroscopy instruments can also be referred to as discrete-
region/filter systems, or continuous spectrum detection systems, based on the mechanisms by which
they separate wavelengths. Discrete filter instruments select wavelengths by passing visible white light
(produced, for example, by a tungsten-halogen bulb) through a filter, allowing only a predetermined,
narrow region wavelength to pass through. Discrete filter instruments do not collect data at all
wavelengths, but only at or near the wavelengths of interest. The biggest advantage of a discrete filter
instrument is the high reproducibility of its narrow wavelength ranges. The main limitation of a filter-
based NIR instrument is that absorption data is only collected at a few specified, narrow range
wavelengths, and so the initial wavelength range selection may be difficult if the sample matrix is
unknown. Filter-based, discrete wavelength instruments also tend to be slow if they are not utilized in
conjunction with simultaneous diode-array (DA) detection for several wavelength ranges. Another
limitation of these filter-based instruments is their limited spectral resolution. For broad NIR absorption
bands, the spectral resolution limitation may not be a problem, especially if the selected filters satisfy the
spectral sampling criterion.
Near-infrared spectroscopic measurements usually deal with inhomogeneous, scattering and absorbing
samples. Such samples are often referred to as turbid samples. This is in contrast to homogeneous
liquid or solid samples, where light scattering does not occur. Nevertheless, the spectroscopic practices
originally developed for non-turbid samples are often employed with turbid samples. Specifically, the
measured reflectance or transmittance signals are converted into absorbance,
Where; I is the measured intensity and IR is the intensity of the reference sample.
The resulting quantity A, is said to be in absorbance units,
If a sample contains more than one absorbing component, then the absorption at a given wavelength will
be the total sum of the proportional contributions from all components in the sample.
EXPERIMENT
In concept, diode array spectrometers are simple instruments. They consist of a diffraction grating to
disperse the light, a focusing and collimating optical element, which could be the grating itself, and a
diode array and associated electronics as the detector. Figure below shows the essential components of
such system.
The system included a near infrared spectrometer with a T.E. cooled, 256 element InGaAs diode array
detector, a self referencing probe with two tungsten halogen lamps, a Hg-Ar line source for automatic
wavelength calibration and a spectralon white paddle for acquiring reference, linearity and noise data.
On-line analysis of moisture in the fluid bed dryer was performed through a viewing port on the fluid bed
dryer.
Dryer Monitor looking through viewing port on Fluid Bed Dryer
Spectra were taken every 3 minutes. Every sample point consisted of an average of 128 spectra.
Acquisition time was 1.8 milliseconds per spectrum, resulting in a total acquisition time of 230
milliseconds per sample. The spectra were saved in absorbance units. Figure below shows the
absorbance spectra for the entire run. All NIR spectra contained in this study were collected using a
diode array NIR Systems, XDS Process Analyzer and Vision software.
Absorbance spectra
Data Analysis:
The data was preprocessed by performing a first derivative on the spectra. The first derivative math
treatment is used commonly in NIR spectroscopy to minimize baseline offset caused by scattering and
enhance absorbance peaks
Figure 2 shows an enlargement of a spectral region that was used to model the moisture in the samples.
A two-factor partial least squares (PLS) regression model was developed with spectra from a calibration
run and loss-on drying (LOD) reference values (see Table 1).
Table 1
Figure 1. Second derivative of spectra Figure 2. An analytical wavelength
taken in process in FBD region used for moisture
analysis.
The second derivative intensity over the range 900–2100 nm was used to develop a prediction model
with an R2 value of 0.9896 and a standard error of calibration (SEC) of 0.2171. See Figure 3 for a plot of
NIR predicted versus LOD % moisture. Although the prediction model performed well, it would be more
robust with more calibration samples included.
Figure 3. A PLS (partial least square) Figure 4. NIR predicted Vs. LOD values.
Model was developed with Standard error of prediction is
an R² value Of 0.9896 & 0.4232.
a SEC (std. error of calibration)
is 0.2171.
Figure 4 shows the NIR predicted moisture versus LOD value. The standard error of prediction is
0.4232%. The LOD standard error was estimated to be 0.33% moisture. The model accuracy would be
improved with Karl Fischer reference data analyzed in a more timely manner. The endpoint
determination can be made when the moisture level asymptotically approaches a lower limit during the
drying cycle. The change in moisture reaches a minimum when the product is dry.
The operator is aided in making the decision to end the drying operation before the product is damaged
or degraded. The delay caused by waiting for lab results before the product can be released for
subsequent processing can be minimized or eliminated. Output from the NIR computer could be used by
the fluid bed dryer’s programmable logic controller (PLC) for closed loop process control decisions. This
provides the ability to monitor critical parameters, and end-point is determined when the desired state is
achieved. Knowing exactly when a dryer has reached its endpoint will save companies energy, eliminate
the destruction of product due to over-drying, and increase the overall efficiency of the drying process.
NIR fits in well with the Process Analytical Technology (PAT) initiative as developed by FDA. One of the
elements of the PAT initiative is to use in-line analysis to increase process understanding and control to
verify product quality and release it for subsequent processing without delay. NIR has proven to be
excellent across a wide range in moisture (1-23%).
References:
1. A.G. Rogers, “Granulation and Drying Principles”, “Hands-on” Postgraduate Course in Tablet
Technology, Univ. Tenn., Memphis (2003).
2. S.M. Maggard, D. E. Root, and M. Duell, J. Process Analytical Chemistry 7(1) (2002).
5. US FDA Draft Guidance “PAT – A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and
Quality Assurance,” August 2003,
http://www.fda.gov/cder/OPS/PAT.htm.
7. R.C. Lyon, E.H. Jefferson, C.D. Ellison, L.F. Buhse, J.A. Spencer, M.M. Nasr, and A.S. Hussain, Am.
Pharm. Rev. 6(3) (2003).
10. T.C. O’Haver and T. Begley, Anal. Chem. 53, 1876–1878 (1981). 11. H. Mark and J. Workman Jr.,
Spectroscopy 18(4) (2003).