Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
108816
HEARING
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE,
SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
UNITED STATES SENATE
ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
FIRST SESSION
(II)
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
CONTENTS
Page
Hearing held on February 27, 2003 ....................................................................... 1
Statement of Senator Allen ..................................................................................... 3
Letters dated February 5,7,10, and 25, 2003 in support of the Allen-
Dodd bill ........................................................................................................... 4,5,6
Statement of Senator Brownback ........................................................................... 1
WITNESSES
Bolen, Edward M., President and CEO, General Aviation Manufacturers As-
sociation ................................................................................................................ 35
Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 38
Creedon, Dr. Jeremiah, Associate Administrator, Office of Aerospace Tech-
nology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration ................................. 17
Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 19
Dietz, Dennis, Director, Manufacturing Research and Development, Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Wichita Division ........................................................... 42
Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 44
Dodd, Hon. Christopher J., U.S. Senator from Connecticut ................................ 7
Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 10
Tomblin, John, Ph.D., Executive Director, National Institute for Aviation
Research, Wichita State University .................................................................... 47
Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 49
Walker, Hon. Robert, S., Chairman, Commission on the Future of the U.S.
Aerospace Industry, and Chairman, Wexler and Walker Public Policy Asso-
ciates ..................................................................................................................... 12
Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 15
APPENDIX
Hollings, Hon. Ernest F., U.S. Senator from South Carolina, prepared state-
ment ...................................................................................................................... 61
(III)
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN AEROSPACE
RESEARCH
U.S. SENATE,
SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND SPACE,
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION,
Washington, DC.
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:30 p.m. in room
SR253, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. Sam Brownback,
Chairman of the Subcommittee, presiding.
OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. SAM BROWNBACK,
U.S. SENATOR FROM KANSAS
Senator BROWNBACK. I call the hearing to order. Thank you all
for joining us here today on the opening hearing about the U.S. in-
volvement in the aerospace research area. I anticipate holding sev-
eral hearings on this, and I think there will be some other mem-
bers joining us throughout the hearing time. I am pleased that
those of you here could join us today.
A hundred years ago, a great journey with unlimited promise
began in this country, and that was the journey of powered flight.
Through this journey we have led the world in amazing techno-
logical advances and the development of innovative products and
services. As we celebrate the great successes of the past one-hun-
dred years, let us reflect on where we have been and turn to where
we need to go.
On December 17th, 1903, the Wright Brothers made history with
a 12-second flight over the sand dunes of Kitty Hawk, North Caro-
lina. Since then, flight has gone through the plains of Kansas and
out across America. In the 1920s and early 1930s, some of the
original aviation entrepreneurs, Clyde Cessna, Walter and Olive
Ann Beach, Lloyd Steerman, formed the companies that continue
to be the leaders in general aviation today. The industry continued
to soar over the plains with the addition of the Boeing Company
through its purchase of the Steerman aircraft in 1929 and a major
expansion of a Kansas presence during World War II. This journey
encompassed the continued development of U.S. military, commer-
cial, and general aviation industries throughout the 1930s, 1940s,
and 1950s that set the standard for the world.
The journey of flight continued as Americans continued to push
the envelope. In 1947, Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier and
established a leadership role in the infancy of the jet aircraft age.
This propelled us to the next step that leads us to the stars with
the establishment of NASA in 1958, and the journey continued,
(1)
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
2
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
3
STATEMENT OF HON. GEORGE ALLEN,
U.S. SENATOR FROM VIRGINIA
Senator ALLEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
This hearing is very timely, and it is going to provide all of us,
a wonderful opportunity to discuss the current state of the U.S.
aeronautics industry as well as what will be necessary to ensure
the U.S. continues to lead the world in all aspects of aeronautics
technology. I very much agree with your bottom line assessment,
and I am glad to see that there are some in the Senate who share
the views of Senator Dodd and myself.
I will talk about the measure that Senator Dodd and I introduced
last year and have reintroduced again, which we think goes a long
way towards addressing our competitiveness, the importance of our
military superiority, as well as how important it is for our economy
that we make the proper investments in our aeronautics research
and development.
We have seen, in the last five years, that NASAs budget for aer-
onautics research and development have been literally cut in half,
from $1 billion to its current level of $500 million. In making these
cuts, the United States has been rendered more vulnerable to for-
eign competition in the field of aeronautics. There is nothing wrong
with competition. I am competitive. But if you are going to com-
pete, you had better be investing right and making the right deci-
sions; otherwise, you are going to get left behind.
The nations of Europe, have moved in the exact opposite direc-
tion, dramatically increasing such funding in an effort to enhance
their competitiveness in the worlds aviation market.
I commend the commission on the future of the U.S. aerospace
industry for crafting a comprehensive and frank report on the state
of the U.S. aerospace industry. I do find it disturbing that our aero-
space industry is still living off research and development initia-
tives that began during the Cold War. If the United States is going
to develop the stealth aircraft of the 21st century, it must make the
commitment to research and development.
This countrys ability to lead the world in innovation and techno-
logical breakthroughs are a direct result of our commitment in the
past, and it is obviously essential that there needs to be significant
investment in research and development on a sustained and stra-
tegic basis. And to make the research and development initiatives
as beneficial as possible, there must be consensus amongst all par-
ties involved on priorities and goals and the best path to achieve
those goals. A commitment to an integrated aerospace policy will
also be necessary for the United States to remain the global leader
in cutting-edge aeronautic technology.
Senator Dodd and I have a great concern with the growing atro-
phy of the Federal commitment to funding for aeronautics research.
After reviewing the commissions report and discussing the press-
ing issues with many in the aeronautics community, I have joined
with Senator Dodd to introduce, this session again, the Aeronautics
Research and Development Revitalization Act. This legislation will
provide aggressive funding authorizations to provide NASA aero-
nautics program with the resources it needs to keep the United
States on the cutting edge on all aspects of aeronautics and avia-
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
4
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
5
improve aviation safety, and security, and attract the next generation of aerospace
scientists and engineers. Assuring the nations ability to develop advanced tech-
nologies for our air defense network is of paramount importance.
The November 2002 report of the Presidential Commission on the Future of the
United States Aerospace Industry states, The United States must maintain its pre-
eminence in aerospace research and innovation to be a global aerospace leader in
the 21st century, and that Government policies and investments in long-term re-
search have not kept pace with the changing world. The Commission report rec-
ommends that the federal government significantly increase its investment in basic
aerospace research, which enhances U.S. national security, enables breakthrough
capabilities, and fosters an efficient, and secure and safe aerospace transportation
system and that the Administration and Congress work together to fund a new
R&D initiative to develop a new 2lst Century air transportation system for the na-
tion.
According to a recent report on The National Economic Impact of Civil Aviation,
the total economic impact of civil aviation exceeded more than $900 billion and 11
million jobs to the U.S. economy in the year 2000, roughly 9 percent of the total
U.S. gross domestic product. The National Aeronautics and Space Administrations
(NASA) and Federal Aviation Administrations (FAAs) budget should reflect this by
striving for a strong national commitment to aeronautical research. If the American
public expects the U.S. aviation industry to continue to be the largest positive con-
tributor to U.S. balance of trade, then we must have the ability to develop the next
generation of aircraft that will enable it to compete internationally.
Over the last decade, funding for NASAs aeronautics research and development
(R&D) program has fallen by approximately 50 percent, and unfortunately this
trend is continuing, The Aeronautics Research and Development Act of 2003 will
provide the necessary funding resources for NASA to compete with the European
Union by implementing a program plan for their Aeronautics Blueprint-Toward a
Bold New Era of Aviation. We strongly support your efforts to counter the dramatic
decline in U.S. research and development spending in aeronautics.
As we approach the centennial of the Wright Brothers first flight, it is more im-
portant than ever that America renew its national commitment to leadership in
aviation. We commend you for your leadership in introducing this important legisla-
tion, and we look forward to working with you and other Members of Congress, in
re-establishing the investment in aeronautics research and development as a na-
tional priority.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
6
DAVID SWAIN
AIRBUS
Herndon VA, February 25, 2003
Hon. George Allen,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Senator:
Thank you for affording me the opportunity to review legislation recently intro-
duced by you, Senator Chris Dodd and Congressman John Larson that strives to
reinvigorate the U.S. aerospace industry.
Airbus is very interested in, and supportive of, many aspects of the Aeronautics
Research and Development Revitalization Act bill. This interest is based on the fact
that Airbus, though headquartered in Europe, is a global company that has long de-
pended on a vibrant, creative and innovative American aerospace industry.
Today, we are a key player in the U.S. industryboth through our U.S. oper-
ations in four locations in three states and through our investments and procure-
ment with our American business partners. Last year, for instance, as a result of
the great aerospace engineering talent that exists in this country, Airbus estab-
lished an engineering office in Kansas. In Airbus North America Engineering, Inc.,
based in Wichita, American engineers are making vital contributions to the design
work for the Airbus A380 aircraft. Furthermore, Airbus spent 40 percent of Its glob-
al procurement budget last year in the United Stateswith American aerospace
manufacturersto provide key components for our full range of aircraft. This $5.6
billion expenditure (greater than Airbus procurement expenses in any other country
in the world) is recognition of the fact that American companies are successfully
competing and successfully producing valuable components of high quality and com-
petitive costs.
Your bill aims to help ensure that American aerospace companies continue to
compete successfully, and we support that aim. There are several key provisions in
this bill that we find compelling and positive for advancing the aerospace industry
generallyand the industry in the U.S. particularly.
Your legislation recognizes that adequate investment in education, training and
research is crucial.
It focuses on some of the most vexing problems facing commercial aviation
today, putting needed resources into reducing noise and emissions.
When the aviation industry fully recovers from the economic downturn and the
events surrounding 9/11, we will be back to the old problem of congestion of the
airspace. Again, your legislation would attack this problem head on, by invest-
ing in weather research and air traffic control systems.
Without dramatic improvements in all these areas, commercial aviation will not
be able to meet the demands of tomorrows marketplace.
Senator, we salute your efforts, and those of your colleagues, to maintain the com-
petitiveness of the U.S. aerospace industryone comprised largely of our business
partners and one clearly integral to our own business success as well.
Sincerely,
T. ALLAN MCARTOR,
Chairman
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
7
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
8
nomics, put aside some of the other very legitimate issues of na-
tional securitywhy we have full standing committees in certain
areas which have a marginal impact on our economic and long-
term security, and subject matters like this, putting aside the issue
of appropriations and the like, just the priority we in the Congress
give to this subject matter seem to have been higher in times past
than it is today. And it is reflected, obviously, in what has hap-
pened over the last decade in budget allocations. But maybe we
ought to think at some point about how we might revive again the
notion and the Senate of the United States placing a greater em-
phasis on this subject matter.
Competition is healthy. It absolutely is. We are all better off for
it. But if you are going to compete, you have got to be in a position
to do so. And we have declined in our capacity to compete effec-
tively. We are all making noteI do in my statementabout De-
cember 17th, 1903, of course, the Wright Brothers famous powered
flight in Kitty Hawk.
I recently was in Ireland and visited a site that I never knew ex-
isted before. It was the site where a couple of guys named Alcock
and Brown, in 1919, flew a plane from Newfoundland, and it crash
landed in Ireland. It was the first successful transatlantic flight.
Obviously, Lindberghs flight some years later is the one that has
got all the attention. I had never heard of Alcock and Brown before.
They flew that plane, imagine, 16 years, only 16 years, after the
Wright Brothers 12 secondsflew a plane, an open-cockpit plane,
the two of them, with twin engines. They were RollsRoyce en-
gines, I noted when I read the plaque.
So early on, there has been competition from the European com-
munity and elsewhere, and that is not a bad thing. We welcome
that. But we have maintained, as you both have pointed out, in the
20th century, really the dominant position in the world, particu-
larly the area of commercial aircraft, of course, and in our defense
structures, as well.
We have been the world leader, and not just in terms of market
share, but also of innovation. The great ideas, the most break-
through technologies that occurred, occurred in the United States.
There were obviously ones that occurred off our shores, as well, but
the bulk of them occurred here.
There has been a dramatic change in the U.S. aeronautics pri-
ority in the last ten years. In 1985, in commercial aircraft, we con-
trolled about 73 percent of the world market. That has declined
now to less than 50 percent of the world market in the past decade.
I do not know that much needs to be said, I mean, just in what
has happened. Now, there are a lot of reasons for ita united Eu-
rope, they are beginning to work more closely together, various
other reasons. But the fact of the matter is, we are declining. And
if you look at the budgets during that same period of time, the re-
search budgets out of NASAs Aeronautics Research and Develop-
ment Program have fallen to about 50 percent of what they were.
So you do not need to have to connect a lot of dots here to under-
stand what has happened.
Now, again, there are a lot of pressures, and very legitimate
pressures, on scarce dollars, but you both have made the point that
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
9
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
10
year 2000, roughly 9 percent of the total U.S. gross domestic prod-
uct was directly related to this industry. And we are now finding
ourselves in a very shaky position.
So our bill has been laid out for you. You understand what it
does. We know there are a lot of ideas you will be getting, Mr.
Chairman. The good news is, you are going to do something about
it. I am confident you will, confident the full Committee will. We
are confident the Senate will. We introduced our bill, I think a lit-
tle late probably, last year to kind of get the kind of attention. But
we are in early this year. This is a great hearing to be having, here
in the early weeks of February, to get us going.
Lastly, I would just mentionand it is not the subject matter of
the Subcommittee directly, but just the very notion of basic re-
search, Mr. Chairman. The one area that we have been very good
at in the last few years in basic research is in health, and I think
the evidence is so overwhelming, what has happened in medical de-
vices and products, there are miracle drugs that are appearing, be-
cause we in the public sector made a commitment to basic re-
search. And you cannot rely on the private sector to pick up the
slack on basic research. Applied research, they can do, but basic re-
search, there are so many empty holes in basic research that just
do not produce anything at all, and you would have a hard time
explaining to shareholders and boards of directors if you invested
hard-earned money as often as you have to in basic research and
to come up empty. But it is something we ought to be able to do
more of, because it has been a critical component of our economic
success in developing new technologies and being on the cutting
edge, internationally.
And so, as a general matter, I wish we could find some way to
reignite the interest in basic research in this country. And this is,
of course, one area where I think we can do something about it, but
I would like to excite you imagination about looking at the basic
research component that we used to play a far more critical role
in, and I think that role contributed, in no small measure, to the
success we enjoyed throughout the 20th century. So I raise that
just as a subject matter for your consideration in future conversa-
tions and debates.
But I am delighted to be joining my colleague from Virginia as
his cosponsor in this very exciting proposal, and we hope you will
find it worthy of your consideration.
[The prepared statement of Senator Dodd follows:]
PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. CHRISTOPHER J. DODD,
U.S. SENATOR FROM CONNECTICUT
Chairman Brownback, Ranking Member Breaux, and Members of this Sub-
committee, I appreciate the opportunity to make some brief remarks today regard-
ing the importance of U.S. involvement in aerospace research.
Aerospace and aviation are important assets for America and for my home state
of Connecticut. In addition to its obvious national security benefits, the aeronautics
industry makes a critical contribution to our nations economic growth and standard
of living. As all of you are aware, this year marks the 100th anniversary of Wilbur
and Orville Wrights first successful powered flight. Since those humble beginnings,
aviation technology in the United States has reached remarkable heights. In the
20th century, the U.S. became the world leader in the aerospace market. Some say
that the age of American preeminence in this field is on the wane. They point to
the fact that in 1985, the United States controlled more than 73 percent of the com-
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
11
mercial aircraft industrywhile today we control less than 50 percent of the global
market.
Over the last decade, funding for the NASAs Aeronautics Research and Develop-
ment program has fallen by approximately 50 percent. Recently the Presidential
Commission on the Future of the Aerospace Industry confirmed these concerns by
concluding that government policies and investments in long-term research have not
kept pace with the changing world, and in order to do so, the Federal government
must invest in aerospace research. I think the Commission said it well when it stat-
ed that We stand dangerously close to squandering the advantage bequeathed to
us by prior generations of aerospace leaders.
In contrast to this disappointing trend in the United States, two years ago, the
European Commission and aerospace industry executives unveiled a report entitled
European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020 which commits more than $93 billion by
2020 and outlines ambitious goals of attaining global leadership in aeronautics and
creating a world class air transport system for Europe and ultimately the entire in-
dustrialized world. The U.S. is now in a position where it must catch up in an effort
not to lose its economic and technological dominance over the international aero-
nautics market.
It is important to also point out that the declining investment in aviation R&D
is causing real economic pain right now to American workers. Right now, in Con-
necticut and across America, highly trained workers are being laid off. Right now,
engineering jobs are being outsourced to other countries where labor costs are lower.
I find this to be an unacceptable threat to our nations long term economic future.
How do we turn this around? Obviously, we cannot order a company to keep peo-
ple on a payroll, and we would be hard-pressed to try to redirect the flow of intellec-
tual capital into and out of the country. As the Wright Brothers so vividly showed,
our country has always had a competitive edge in the world economy: the ingenuity
of our people. This ingenuity has been cultivated by two factors above all others:
one, the quality and funding of education; two, by investments in research and de-
velopment. Obviously education is within the jurisdiction of another committee, but
R&D is in the control of this Committee and specifically this Subcommittee. It is
critical that we invest in our research and development and technology sectors so
that American workers will lead the world in developing and building the tech-
nologies of tomorrow. The importance of civil aviation to our economy cannot be un-
derestimated. It generated more than 900 billion dollars and 11 million jobs for the
U.S. economy in the year 2000, roughly 9 percent of the total U.S. gross domestic
product. This is not a sector that we can afford to continue to ignore.
Our colleague Senator Allen and I recently reintroduced legislation addressing
this very issue. The Aeronautics Research & Development Revitalization Act of
2003, S. 309, establishes a broad-based agenda to reinvigorate Americas aeronautics
and aviation R&D enterprise and maintain Americas competitive leadership in
aviation.
Our bill doubles NASA and FAA research and development funding by 2008 to
$1.15 billion and $550 million respectively. It sets new research goals for supersonic
transport, rotorcraft, high-efficiency and other technologies that the private sector
has identified as critical to future success in this industry. In addition, it establishes
professional training and scholarship programs to cultivate the talent of tomorrow.
I am pleased that you are holding this hearing, Mr. Chairman, because it is im-
portant that all of Congress, the Administration, and America know that these are
the facts, and the affects of losing this leadership will be detrimental to this nation
as a whole. I hope that members of this Committee will take a look at our bill in
the coming weeks. Senator Allen and I believe that this legislation merits the sup-
port of our colleagues. I look forward to working with you and other of our col-
leagues in the future. Thank you.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
12
groups. And I have asked her about what is her real focus and in-
terest, and shewe talk about nano-technology and a number
areas, but she says, you know, really we need to put money into
physics, mathematics, and she was really digging at that same
point, as well, that there is a feeling like you are just not planting
the seed corn that you need to in those areas.
We have moved forward in a lot of nice areas very strongly,
NIHs doubling of budget over the last five years, great investment
producing great results, human genome project, beautiful tech-
nology, beautiful information. Almost weekly you are seeing some-
thing, we have found for the gene for this or for that. I wonder how
many of those bad genes I have, but I have not asked yet, and I
do not know if I want to know. But it is really going to help us
a lot in the future. But I do not know that we have invested in the
same sense in those basic physics, mathematics that we need to.
So I appreciate your comments backing those up, as well.
Senator DODD. Thanks very much. Thank you both.
Senator BROWNBACK. Thank you very much for joining us.
The first panel we will have up, Honorable Robert S. Walker,
chairman, Wexler and Walker Public Policy Associates here in
Washington, DC Bob Walker, as former Congressman Bob Walker,
was chairman of the Science Committee in the House side a num-
ber of years, a long-time advocate or research and specific research
agendas to be able to help and build the strength and might of the
United States. And also Dr. Jeremiah Creedon, associate adminis-
trator, Office of Aerospace Technology of NASA here in Wash-
ington, DC.
Gentlemen, thank you very much, both, for joining us. Your full
statements will be put into the record if you want to summarize.
It is your choice. We are delighted you are here.
Mr. Walker, Congressman Walker, we are delighted to have you
here.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
13
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
14
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
15
humans bring curiosity and ingenuity. Robots merely see the ex-
pected. Their successes and discoveries are based upon past experi-
ences. Humans, however, when we are confronted with the unex-
pected, can produce greater discoveries.
We cannot allow out international competitors to surpass us.
Japan, China, India, and France all see space as a strategic and
economic frontier that should be aggressively pursued. China is
poised to launch a moon mission in a few short years, and I believe
their intentions are not just to fly to the moon, but to stay there
and set up a permanent base.
Whenever I consider why we travel in space, I have seen the
hand of God beckoning us to the heavens. We stand in a moment
in history when we can either respond to that call or retreat from
it. I believe, for own generation and for those to follow, we must
be willing to invest the resources and summon the courage to reach
as far as we can into the universe.
I thank you for the opportunity to make this address.
[The prepared statement of Mr. Walker follows:]
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
16
In 1908, Wilbur Wright stated, But it is not really necessary to look too far into
the future; we see enough already to be certain that it will be magnificent. Only
let us hurry up and open the roads.
Research and development are the roads that lead to revolutionary aerospace ca-
pabilities. In the past, aerospace led the technology revolution because of large pub-
lic investment in research directed at national security imperatives and goals.
Today, we do not have an integrated national aerospace consensus to guide policies
and programs. This has resulted in unfocused government and industry investments
spread over a range of research programs and aging infrastructure.
The lack of sufficient, sustained public funding for research, development, tests,
and evaluation infrastructure limits the nations ability to address critical national
challenges and to foster breakthrough aerospace capabilities that could enable a
new era in aerospace leadership for America.
Chapter 9 of the Aerospace Commissions report discusses our recommendation
that the federal government significantly increase its investment in basic aerospace
research, which enhances U.S. national security, enables breakthrough capabilities,
and fosters an efficient, secure, and safe aerospace transportation system. We also
make it clear that the U.S. aerospace industry should take a leading role in apply-
ing research to product development.
Transformational Issues
Propulsion and Power
Development of more advanced propulsion systems will lead to faster transit
times, improve operational flexibility and reduce the impact of radiation for long du-
ration human exploration missions. Nuclear energy could produce a high-tempera-
ture plasma that would potentially reduce the transit time for a manned mission
to Mars from seven or eight months to about twelve weeks. The Commission be-
lieves that once the time to explore many parts of the solar system has been reduced
to reasonable durationsmonths instead of yearsthe political imperative to do so
will follow. Increasing available power, both on orbit and beyond orbit, could expand
opportunities in military, civil, and commercial space applications.
Breakthrough Energy Sources
In the 21st century, new energy sources must be developed in order to achieve
revolutionary new air and space capabilities. As President Bush recently outlined
in his State of the Union address, we are moving towards a hydrogen economy. Use
of hydrogen fuel cells in aircraft technology can be an important step in establishing
a hydrogen economy that could free the U.S. from dependence on foreign sources
of energy.
Nanotechnology
Not only did microtechnology lead to computers and the Internet during the sec-
ond half of the 20th century, but it also brought us to the beginning of an exciting
scientific revolution we now know as Nanotechnology. Recent discoveries indicate
that at the nano scale, devices and systems have completely different electrical, me-
chanical, magnetic and optical properties from those of the same material in bulk
form. This could lead to such an increase in material strength that could revolu-
tionize aerospace vehicle structural design and performance.
The benefits of research may not be realized for decades but are critical to innova-
tion and to keeping the nations intellectual capital fresh and vibrant.
The obstacle we face is to move forward with these advancements; we need to
change the underlying infrastructure. Testimony before the Commission and studies
conducted by the federal government over the last decade have found that the na-
tions research infrastructure is aging and unable to meet our future needs.
Much of the U.S. RDT&E infrastructure is 4050 years old. We need to identify
and invest in a new infrastructure that supports U.S. government and aerospace in-
dustry needs so our infrastructure does not become a constraint on our countrys
technological advancement.
Transformational research and the associated RDT&E infrastructure are the
building blocks for developing breakthrough aerospace capabilities and are indispen-
sable parts of the U.S. innovation process. But in order to achieve true technological
prowess, industry has a great role and responsibility.
The Commission believes that the U.S. aerospace industry must take the leader-
ship in transitioning research into products and services. The transition of govern-
ment research to the aerospace sector has been slow. The industry must aggres-
sively develop business strategies that can incorporate government-funded research
into application.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
17
I would like to take a moment to address another subject of the Commission re-
port, which is under the jurisdiction of this Subcommittee. The Columbia tragedy
has presented new challenges and questions about the advisability of human space
flight. I believe there is no more important mission than to extend our reach beyond
the known into the unknown. We do that by investing in basic research but we also
do that on the frontiers of space.
Some may say we can learn all we need to know by sending robots in our place.
I would say that robots have their place, but it is not the same as ours. I contend
that there are three main reasons for us to continue to press forward with human
space flight:
The manned space program challenges uspushes the envelope of technology to
achieve the breakthroughs only made possible by humans.
To those who say that robots are cheaper, better, and faster than humans, I say
humans bring curiosity and ingenuity. Robots merely see the expectedtheir suc-
cess and discoveries are based on past experiences. Humans however, when we are
confronted with the unexpected can produce greater discoveries.
We cannot allow our international competitors to surpass us. Japan, China, India
and France all see space as a strategic and economic frontier that should be aggres-
sively pursued. China is poised to launch a moon mission in a few short years and
I believe that their intentions are not to just fly to the moon, but to stay there and
set up a permanent base.
Whenever I have considered why we travel to space, I have seen the hand of God
beckoning us into the heavens. We stand in a moment in history when we either
respond to that call or retreat from it. I believe for our own generation and for those
to follow, we must be willing to invest the resources and summon the courage to
reach as far as we can into the universe.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today, and I look for-
ward to your questions.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
18
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
19
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
20
I want to paraphrase this Mission Statement slightly to point to the Strategic and
Enabling goals that NASA developed to support each element, and from there, dis-
cuss the work we do in specific support of the Commissions recommendations in
Chapters 2, 3, 8 and 9.
To Understand and protect Our Home Planet . . . leads to specific NASA goals
for enabling a safer, more secure, more efficient and more environmentally friendly
aviation system, and improving security and quality of life. As NASA works with
the FAA and others to achieve these goals, we are in direct support of the Commis-
sions report, especially the Chapter 2 recommendation to transform the U.S. air
transportation system and the Chapter 9 recommendation to enable breakthrough
aerospace capabilities.
To Explore the Universe and search for life . . . leads to specific NASA goals of
assuring access to space, and developing revolutionary technologies that enable the
agencys science missions of the future, which in turn, open new opportunities to
science, exploration and commercial space endeavors. These efforts support the view
in Chapter 3 of the Commission report.
To Inspire the Next Generation of Explorers . . . leads us to NASA goals for
working with educators, K12 students, and the university community, to ensure
that the aerospace industry has access to a scientifically and technically trained
workforce as recommended in Chapter 8 of the Commission report.
As only NASA can . . . leads us to the unique basic research and technology de-
velopment NASA performs to fulfill our Mission, particularly in areas that offer the
potential for breakthroughs in critical aerospace capabilities such as propulsion and
power, information technology, and nanotechnology as recommended in Chapter 9
of the Commission report.
Early last year NASA unveiled an Aeronautics Blueprint that outlined a new and
revolutionary technology vision to address the aviation challenges we face in the
21st Century. The four critical areas for technological investment identified in the
Blueprint and also included in the Commissions areas of emphasis are: a Digital
Airspace, Revolutionary Vehicles, Aviation Safety and Security, and a State-of-the-
Art Educated Workforce. These Blueprint elements have been incorporated in
NASAs 2003 Strategic Plan.
Specific NASA activities in alignment with the Commissions
Recommendations
Through our Mission and goals, we have set the priorities that guide our invest-
ment of the taxpayers money, and clearly inform our Enterprises, Centers, and
most importantly, each of our employees, how they contribute with their particular
talents and capabilities to meet the nations critical needs. This hearing is a timely
opportunity to highlight changes Administrator OKeefe has made within NASA, as
well as elements in the Presidents Fiscal Year 2004 budget that speak directly to
the Commissions recommendations. Recent highlights include:
NASA has an Education initiative to turn the tide on declined interest in
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
NASA has a new Integrated Space Transportation Plan to more fully integrate
its efforts in the International Space Station, the Space Shuttle and the Space
Launch Initiative to support Science activities in space.
NASA developed (with industry, academia, the FAA, and DoD) an Aeronautics
Blueprint to define technologies that have the potential to open a completely
new era in aviation by providing unprecedented air transportation safety and
efficiency, a transformed national defense, new markets and economic growth,
and enhanced quality of life.
Overall NASA has aligned its programs to better represent and reflect national
priorities and to better concentrate our efforts. What follows is a summary of some
of our key activities.
AVIATION
The Commission has called for, in Recommendation #2, an air transportation sys-
tem that meets the needs of civil aviation, homeland security and national defense.
The Presidents Fiscal Year 2004 Budget reprioritizes investments and increases
funding for three new initiatives focused on National Airspace System Transition,
Quiet Aircraft Technology, and Aviation Security.
A critical element for the work in aviation is the need to set up an interagency
organization to guide and coordinate efforts for a National Aviation System Trans-
formation. FAA, NASA, and OSTP have coordinated a proposal for such an organi-
zation that would set goals and align missions across government to ensure that the
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
21
United States can meet future system demands, and stay at the forefront of the
global aviation industry.
National Airspace System Transition: Prior to the attacks of September 11,
2001, the aviation system was showing unmistakable signs of gridlock. Most air
travelers had experienced congested airports, flight delays, and unreliable service.
Since deregulation of the airline industry in the United States in 1978, air travel
has tripled while the air transportation support infrastructure has remained rel-
atively unchanged. Only one large hub airport and seven new runways have been
opened in the past decade, while the number of departures had grown nearly 30
percent from 7 million to 9 million per year.
As a result of the impact of September 11th on the economy and air transport
system, the current demand has been reduced but we believe that the capacity
issues that we faced prior to the attacks will return. Specifically, the growth in
delays in the years 2000 and 2001 significantly outpaced the growth in air traffic.
Our existing airspace management system clearly cannot accommodate projected
growth. We need to continue the development of technology to solve the problem of
limited capacity of the National Airspace System (NAS). We do not want to have
a situation where the capacity of the system constrains national economic growth.
Safety and security have taken on a whole new perspective since the terrorist at-
tacks. NASA is committed to working with airlines, airports, and other Federal
agencies to develop concepts and technologies, which will reduce the vulnerability
of aircraft and the NAS to criminal and terrorist attacks.
I am pleased to report that through reprioritization within the Presidents FY
2004 budget, there is increased funding to address these critical aviation issues and
begin the development of technology to increase the efficiency and capacity of the
National Airspace System (NAS).
We will invest $27 million in FY 2004 for this initiative, which we call the Na-
tional Airspace System Transition ($100 million over 5 years). The major challenges
are to accommodate the projected growth in air traffic while preserving and enhanc-
ing safety; providing all airspace system users more flexibility, efficiency and access
in the use of airports, airspace and aircraft; enable new modes of operation that
support the FAA commitment to Free Flight and the Operational Evolution Plan
(OEP); and develop technology to enable transition to a next generation National
Airspace System beyond the OEP horizon.
The research within this program will be focused on developing a more flexible
and efficient operational approach to air traffic management. For example, together
with the FAA, NASA will investigate and solve the technical challenges of increas-
ing runway capacity in inclement weather to eliminate the biggest source of
delayspoor visibility. We will also develop totally new concepts that allow the sys-
tem to scale with increasing traffic levels. We are developing sophisticated new mod-
eling capabilities of the nations air traffic system so we can test out our tools and
concepts.
As the Commission has pointed out, the transfer of technologyto ensure its ap-
plicationis essential to realize its value. Through efforts such as an interagency
program office we will strengthen ties between the member agencies, and work simi-
larly with academia and industry to transition the research into technologies, prod-
ucts and services useful to the nation.
Quiet Aircraft Technology: Noise is typically a primary objection that commu-
nities have to airport or runway expansions. Airports located in remote areas when
they were built are now located in the midst of sprawling communities. They are
subject to an increasing number of noise restrictions affecting airport and aircraft
operations. Since 1980, noise restrictions at airports grew worldwide from 250 to
over 800 airports with specific additional restrictions beyond normal regulations.
The U.S. has spent more than $4 billion from the Aviation Trust Fund and Pas-
senger Facility Charges over the last 20 years to mitigate airport noise (e.g., sound-
insulating nearby homes, building protective barriers). Reducing the noise impact on
communities is a key issue for 21st Century aviation.
To illustrate this challenge of reducing aircraft-generated noise, we have con-
ducted analyses of aircraft noise at Chicago OHare International Airport. Using the
baseline 1997 aviation fleet noise-level contours, objectionable noise levels extend
many miles from the airport and affect approximately 600,000 people in the sur-
rounding community. A quieter fleet of aircraft with a 10-decibel reduction in noise
will reduce that impact on all but approximately 55,000 people. NASAs research
and technology development continues to be focused on how to eliminate noise as
an issueby confining any objectionable noise to within the airport boundaries.
The Presidents FY 2004 budget has increased the funding to address this critical
aviation issue. NASAs Quiet Aircraft Technology Program is the primary source of
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
22
technology to achieving the noise goal and includes an increase of $15 million in FY
2004 (an increase of $100 million over 5 years) for this work.
NASA is developing technologies that can directly change the noise produced by
jet engines. Through an understanding of the basic physics of noise production we
are able to interfere with the way that sound is produced, creating quieter aircraft
for future travelers. We have also determined that a large part of the objectionable
noise comes from parts of the aircraft other than the engines when the aircraft are
approaching the runway. NASA is developing concepts for landing gear and wing
configurations to reduce this objectionable noise. Physics-based tools for noise propa-
gation allow us to test the benefits of new flight profiles to bring the aircraft noise
closer to the airport while maintaining flight safety.
In FY 2001, NASA was able to conduct full-scale demonstrations of noise reduc-
tion technologies that would result in a 5 decibels reduction in perceived noise. This
technology has been transferred to industry and is already being offered on produc-
tion aircraft and engines. Based on these results and the increased funding provided
in the Presidents Budget for research, we will be able to work in partnership with
the engine and aircraft manufacturers to bring additional noise reduction technology
to new aircraft more quickly than had been otherwise planned. We are expecting
to demonstrate an additional 5-decibel reduction in perceived noise by the end of
FY2007, leading to a total of 10dB reduction in comparison to the 1997 state of the
art. To better understand the significance of this accomplishment, we can refer back
to the illustration of Chicagos OHare airport. With a 5-decibel reduction the area
encompassed by the contour of objectionable noise was reduced by 40 percent, with
a 10-decibel reduction, the effected area is reduced almost 70 percent.
Aviation Security and Safety: Aviation has a long-standing tradition of being
the safest among all modes of transportation. The rate of accidents and fatalities
on a per-passenger-mile basis for commercial aviation is at least a factor of two
lower than that achieved by any other mode of transportation. However, as aviation
continues to grow, there are concerns that unless steps are taken to drastically re-
duce accident rates, increased flights will lead to more accidents. Any incident re-
ceives visibility, and some are deemed national tragedies. Each affects the publics
faith and confidence in aviation as a whole. Thus in 1997 the National Civil Avia-
tion Review Commission endorsed a goal to cut the fatal accident rate by 80 percent
by 2007. Much progress has been made in NASA technology development for avia-
tion safety. In particular we have seen the transition of advanced cockpit weather
technology into operational practiceboth forecast and real-time. In the area of se-
curity for aviation there is a lot of synergy with the technologies for safety.
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, safety and security have taken
on a whole new perspective. NASA is committed to working with airlines, airports,
and other Federal agencies to develop concepts and technologies that will reduce the
vulnerability of aircraft and the national airspace system to criminal and terrorist
attacks
As part of the Presidents FY 2004 Budget request, NASA will begin a new effort
in Aviation Security. We will invest $21 million in FY 2004 for this initiative ($225
million over 5 years). Research in this program will focus on concepts and tech-
nologies that can protect aircraft and the airspace system from criminal and ter-
rorist attacks while dramatically improving the efficiency of security. In the near-
term, NASA will develop and demonstrate decision support technologies for ground-
based air traffic management systems that detect and assist in the management of
threatening situations. Other areas include technologies to reconfigure the aircraft
to fly safely in the event of damage, and flight controls technology that would pre-
vent the aircraft from being purposefully crashed. While details of the program are
in formulation, it is currently expected that the long-term research will address:
Protection of Aircraft & Airborne Systems from Electro-Magnetic Interference
Airspace Operations
Transfer of Fundamental Information Technology to Security Applications
Transfer of Fundamental Sensor Technology to Security Applications
NASA has and will continue to work closely and partner with the Department of
Defense (DoD), the Department of Transportation (DOT), the Federal Aviation Ad-
ministration (FAA), the Department of Homeland Security, academia, and industry
to ensure that the research that NASA pursues is deliberately and methodically in-
tegrated into useful and timely products and processes.
ACCESS TO SPACE
The Commission has called for ensuring our nations ability to explore and utilize
space, in Recommendation #3, as well as in Recommendation #9, which calls for in-
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
23
creasing federal investments in basic aerospace research with the goal of reducing
the expense and time to reach space safely and reliably.
NASA agrees with the need to ensure and improve access to space. In the Presi-
dents Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 2003, NASA has formulated the revised
Integrated Space Transportation Plan (ISTP) to ensure that safe, affordable, capa-
ble, and reliable space transportation systems are provided to support NASAs mis-
sions. The Space Launch Initiative (SLI), which began in 2001 as a key component
of the ISTP, will provide the necessary technology development, risk reduction, and
systems analysis to enable future space access capabilities. Based on recent system
analyses, the ISTP has been updated and SLI has been refocused. As a result,
NASA has a more tightly integrated plan to support its science driven missions. We
believe the revised ISTP is a good plan, but we are committed to re-examining it
if necessary in light of future investigation findings on the Columbia accident. The
Space Launch Initiative budget is now focused on the highest agency space trans-
portation priorities: investing in an Orbital Space Plane (OSP) for assured access
to the ISS and the Next Generation Launch Technology (NGLT) Program that fo-
cuses on the most critical technology development activities, such as propulsion, ve-
hicle health monitoring, and high temperature structures.
The OSP Program will develop a human-crewed vehicle with multi-purpose utility
for the Agency. Initially serving as an ISS Crew Return Vehicle launched on an Ex-
pendable Launch Vehicle, the OSP will also provide crew transfer and limited cargo
capability. The results of the OSP will enable a transition path to future space
launch vehicle systems under development in NGLT.
The NGLT Program will be NASAs research arm for access-to-space technologies.
As in aeronautics, access to space will require interagency partnerships to meet
common needs. NASA is in the beginning of a cooperative effort with the Depart-
ment of Defense, through the National Aerospace Initiative (NAI), jointly working
to build a technology roadmap for hypersonics research and access to space tech-
nologies. We will also work with the Air Force Space Command on analyses for al-
ternatives, and towards developing requirements for the next-generation launcher.
In-Space Propulsion Research
Consistent with the Recommendation #9 of the Commission, to reduce the transit
time between two points in space by 50 percent, NASA supports the Aerospace Com-
missions recommendation that more research is needed in power and propulsion
systems. These systems have the potential for enabling missions that are not cur-
rently feasible. High performance propulsion systems will allow spacecraft to ex-
plore regions of space currently out of our reach, carry significantly greater scientific
payloads, and will significantly reduce the time required to travel to destinations
within the Solar System. This technology is needed to undertake sophisticated
science operations in the outer Solar System that support the search for life. More-
over, this technology can greatly increase the speed, robustness, and science return
of future robotic missions, while also serving as a stepping-stone to potential future
human exploration beyond Earth orbit.
The NASA Research Centers successfully pioneered the basic research on ion pro-
pulsion that led to the first demonstration of this technology on Deep Space One
in 1998. They also developed the pulsed plasma thrusters demonstrated on the
Earth Observing One spacecraft in 2001. The Presidents budget continues the de-
velopment of the next generation of propulsion technologies. Our goals are to in-
crease the operating power of electric thrusters, to extend thruster lifetime, and to
develop analytical models for optimizing thruster performance. The Presidents
budget request for NASA also includes funding for an augmented nuclear program
now called Project Prometheusas one of the agencys top priorities. Project Pro-
metheus enables robust and flexible missions to explore areas of our Solar System
where solar power is not practical, and it opens the door to a new generation of
space exploration missions. Project Prometheus will focus on two major areas of nu-
clear power and propulsion research and development: improved versions of tradi-
tional radioisotope systems and development of a fission reactor to provide the nec-
essary electricity to power electric engines and more capable science instruments.
The first demonstration of this capability is planned for the rovers of the Mars
Science Lander, scheduled for launch in 2009. This new generation of radioisotope
power systems will allow spacecraft, landers, and probes to operate 24 hours a day,
seven days a week, with increased mobility and reconnaissance capabilities.
NASA will also complete research and development of the first reactor-powered
spacecraft and demonstrate safe and reliable operations on long-duration, deep
space missions. The Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO) has been identified as the
first space science mission to demonstrate this capability. Scheduled for launch in
the next decade, this ambitious mission will orbit three of Jupiters moons, Callisto,
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
24
Ganymede, and Europa, to explore their makeup, history, and potential for sus-
taining life. This mission not only demonstrates a valuable new technology, it ad-
dresses a highest priority science objective from the National Academy of Sciences
going to Europa to confirm growing evidence that a global ocean is hiding beneath
its icy surface. Europa is likely to contain the three things necessary for life to
evolveliquid water, a source of heat, and organic material. 1 This technology
makes it possible to realistically consider missions that orbit multiple targets se-
quentially. Such a capability is tremendously advantageous, and it paves the way
for an entirely new generation of space exploration missions.
A Vision of the Future
Finally, to bring this together as a system, an approach we like at NASA, I would
like to take you into the future to envision how these investments will help enable
the aerospace system of the future.
The impact of information technology cannot be overstatedfrom the tools that
help engineers develop the highly complex air traffic management system of the fu-
ture, to the design of the new vehicles that will fly in it. To achieve unprecedented
safety, information technologies will be critical in transforming data into knowledge
to give pilots precise situational awareness of weather conditions, other aircraft, and
terrain, as well as knowledge of their aircraft through intelligent and autonomous
hardware and software systems that can adapt, self-improve, self-repair and self-re-
configure in response to component faults and failures. The application towards
aviation security is equally powerful. It can detect aircraft that do not conform to
normal operating patterns and determine whether there is malicious intent or help
is needed. In either case, strategies would be in place to land the aircraft safely.
Airports in the future are increasingly busy centers of commerce as businesses clus-
ter there for the environment conducive for increased productivity, now free from
the noise of aircraft operations and emissions, and the convenience of reliable and
affordable service.
Industry-sponsored research on the Space Station will have created a constellation
of commercial space platforms, some inhabited, others autonomously operated, meet-
ing the needs of industry research, development, and production for space-based
products. The Next Generation Launch Technologies research will have paved the
way for reliable and affordable airline-like service transporting cargo and pas-
sengers to and from orbit on a routine basis. These new vehicles will diagnose their
own health status, scheduling maintenance, identifying anomalies that require at-
tention, self-correct and repair minor faults, and track trends that could lead to
anomalies. Nano- and information technologies will have made these capabilities
possible.
New space research vehicles will combine new propulsion and power technologies,
high-strength low-mass structural materials, and sensors with dramatically in-
creased sensitivity and low power consumption. High-speed transport to the outer
planets and beyond, for science missions, will take weeks and months, not years and
decades. Nano-technology will have exploited physical phenomena at the nanometer
scale, creating healing metals for spacecraft skin to repair damage such as micro-
meteorite hits on long duration missions. Scientific returns per mission will increase
100-fold as research equipment and payloads are more capable and comprise the
majority of launch mass. NASA will be conducting missions that go beyond our solar
system. Robots will work collaboratively with humans to maximize scientific re-
turns. Research in automated reasoning will have enabled these robotic assistants
to contend with uncertainty, making them significantly more mobile, and more sci-
entifically capable. Space communications will allow scientists high-data rate access
to space assets, wherever they are, retrieving their data from extreme environ-
ments, over interplanetary distances and long mission lifetimes.
We also envision a vibrant educational system in the U.S.. Grade schools and high
schools now have new teaching tools and curricula inspired by NASAs programs,
and our efforts including the cadre of Teacher-Astronauts have inspired thousands
of students to pursue scientific and technical careers. The universities with special-
ties in engineering and the sciences have full enrollment with growing programs,
and their graduates will be finding exciting opportunities in both government re-
search and the private sector job market.
These are only snapshots of the possibilities. As the last century of advances made
possible by investments in aerospace research has shown, we are hard-pressed to
imagine what is truly possible in an environment that nurtures innovation.
1 Press Release, July 11, 2002 Missions to Kuiper Belt Now, Europa Within the Decade are
Key to Space Discoveries, National Academy of Sciences
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
25
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
26
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
27
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
28
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
29
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
30
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
31
system much greater and things such as that, and that, could con-
tribute to a increase in the budget in the future years.
Senator ALLEN. Well, the point is, comparing budgets, you fore-
see, in this budget, level funding; and, in the future, a 5 percent
decrease in research in
Dr. CREEDON. I think it will
Senator ALLEN.aeronautics.
Dr. CREEDON.be easier to tell, because we have a separate
budget and
Senator ALLEN. Understood.
Dr. CREEDON.and the current projections. The current plan is
for 5 percent decrease in the future, but this morning in testimony,
the administrator said that there was athe work that we were
doing with the FAA could be taken into account and may yet result
in a increase over that 5 percent decrease.
Senator ALLEN. That is if you includethere is nothing wrong
with including that specific program, but
Dr. CREEDON. Except that the plans have not yet been finalized,
I think, is why it is not in the budget at this time.
Senator ALLEN. Well, you will understand why there will be
some of us senatorsmyself, Senator Dodd, and hopefully others
who will be working to increase that.
Dr. CREEDON. I certainly do. And we certainly support the intent
of the bill that you and Senator Dodd have introduced to point out
the importance of investment in aeronautical research and the role
that research and technology play in this whole area.
Senator ALLEN. I am sorry, I have exceeded this. If I mayon
the SATS program for general aviation, I want to commend you in
what you all are doing there, working with FAA, for small airports
and for general aviation. I was there at the unveiling of it in
Danville, and I think that that has a great deal of potential for not
only general aviation; it is great for those communities to have ac-
cess, much easier access. I even like the idea because I always like
to look at what the price of fuel is. It even gives you information
as to what the price of fuel is, and that does change from facility
to facility, and it is, I think, an outstanding program that will real-
ly be beneficial to many smaller markets and rural areas.
Dr. CREEDON. Thank you.
Senator ALLEN. So I want to commend you on that.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator BROWNBACK. Thank you.
Mr. WALKER. Mr. Chairman?
Senator BROWNBACK. Go ahead.
Mr. WALKER. Could I comment for just a moment on the inter-
agency
Senator BROWNBACK. Yes, please.
Mr. WALKER.that Mr. Creedon was talking about, because I
think that it is important to understand, coming off the commission
report, that the interagency cooperation that he referenced with
FAA is extremely important, we believe, for the long-term funding
of a lot of these programs.
And I would reference one other program. NASA is cooperating
with DoD in the National Aerospace Initiative that DoD is bringing
forward. That probably has more potential for huge breakthroughs
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
32
in the aeronautical area than any other things that is being done.
And the cooperative program between those two agencies in that
arena could very well produce some of the breakthroughs and can
assure that we have funding streams from a couple of different
places that can move the program forward.
Senator BROWNBACK. Yeah, it seemed like to me when you were
talking about our superiority in military aircraft, that taking some
of that technology that is developed there and getting it out to our
private side would really be helpful.
Chairman Walker, you have been around government a good pe-
riod of time. You have seen us lose market share to Airbus from,
well, it was not probably five years ago, maybe seven, when we
were at 73 percent; now Airbus is passing us up, or projected, for
the first time, and that is in a down market. They are expanding
in a difficult market.
What are we going to have to do? Are we going to have to heavily
subsidize the way Airbus is to get back into a stronger position?
Are we going to have to do different business model plans or try
to attract more investment dollars into the aircraft manufacturing
business?
Mr. WALKER. We certainly have to do some things about chang-
ing the business model. And some of that probably does involve at
least being competitive with them in the favorable financing plans
that they offer to airlines and the nations around the world as they
are doing it. I hope that we do not have to go to government sub-
sidies to do that, but we certainly ought to have a financial plan
that works that allows Boeing to be competitive in those areas.
The other thing that we certainly found with Airbus is that they
justthey have an aggressive plan moving forward. The question
that you have to ask yourself, and it is a worthwhile question, is
whether or not they have bet right. I mean, they are betting on the
A380, which is a huge new airplane that is going to fly lots of pas-
sengers from hub to hub. The question is whether or not the travel
in the future is going to be hub to hub or whether it is going to
be point to point.
And one of the ways in which we can compete in this country is
by developing the point-to-point airplanes that allow us to have a
generation of aircraft that would be competitive because of a very
different kind of business model. And some of those will be very
small airplanes. Some of those will be more general aviation-type
airplanes than they will be even the regional jet capacities.
But I can imagine the business people of the future, who will not
fly hub to hub, who will want to get up in the town where they
live and fly to the town where they are doing business and come
right back, and do so in a time frame that fits inside their business
pattern. That is a huge challenge for our airlines, because that
means a lot of the people that have flown in the front of their cabin
and paid the big fees may be transferred off into some other mode
of transportation in the future. And so that has to be taken into
account.
But there is a changing business model that is already being ob-
served. And insofar as we can get in front of that, we have a
chance of being very competitive with the Europeans in the future.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
33
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
34
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
35
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
36
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
37
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
38
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
39
range from small, single-engine planes to mid-size turboprops to the larger
turbofans capable of flying non-stop from New York to Tokyo. These planes are used
for business purposes and recreation, as well as everything from emergency medical
evacuations to border patrols and fire fighting. General aviation aircraft are also
used by individuals, companies, state governments, universities and other interests
to quickly and efficiently reach the more than 5,000 small and rural communities
in the United States that are not served by commercial airlines.
General aviation is the backbone of our air transportation system and the primary
training ground for the commercial airline industry. The U.S. general aviation fleet
consists of over 214,000 aircraft that fly more than 29 million hours per year and
carry more than 166 million passengers. According to a recent study by Global In-
sight, general aviation contributes more than $41 billion to our nations GDP each
year and generates over a half million jobs.
Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry
Mr. Chairman, serving on the Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace
Industry was an honor and a tremendous educational experience. Unlike previous
commissions, this one looked at the totality of the aerospace industrynot just one
of its individual segments like civil aviation or space or military. As a result, the
Commission was not limited to viewing the industry through the prism of a single
federal agency like NASA, the FAA or the DoD. Instead, we had the opportunity
to see how the Federal Government as a whole treated aerospace.
What we found was that the United States did not have a unifying aerospace vi-
sion or a coordinated aerospace policy. Instead, our nations aerospace programs, in-
cluding research efforts, were the result of ad hoc decisions made by a patchwork
of federal agencies.
The Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry believes this situa-
tion needs to change if our nation is to continue to be the world leader in aerospace.
We can no longer afford to have redundant federal research programs. We can no
longer afford for one federal agency to keep taxpayer funded technology from an-
other. We can no longer afford to have research programs that industry does not
value. And, we can no longer afford to work on technologies that have no chance
of being certified for use in the national airspace system.
To remedy this situation, we need better coordination between Congressional
Committees, government agencies and industry. There is some coordination today
but it is generally fragmented and tactical. We need to be more strategic. We also
need to start looking at federally funded facilities and capabilities as national assets
rather than as proprietary assets of the civil aviation system or the space program
or the military.
Let me give you an example of what I am talking about.
Recently, the Air Force announced that it would close its one-of-a-kind Climatic-
test Center at Eglin Air Force Base because it was no longer serving an Air Force
function. The problem with that decision is that the Climatic Center, which is a
technologically advanced hangar that can simulate harsh environmental conditions,
is used by more than just the Air Force. Domestic manufacturers of civil aviation
products use the facility to test their products in extreme heat or extreme cold so
that they can determine the environmental operating envelope for their products
and obtain FAA certification.
The Climatic Center is an extremely valuable facility but one that would be too
expensive for a single manufacturer to maintain. Its imminent closure represents
the lost of an important national aerospace asset. The closure may be a good deci-
sion for the Air Force, but it is clearly not in the best interest of the U.S. aerospace
industry and the U.S. taxpayer.
Situations like the one at Eglin Air Force Base can only be remedied with better
coordination and cooperation between the various parts of the Federal Government.
I urge this Subcommittee to use its power to facilitate that coordination and co-
operation.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
As everyone knows, one of our nations foremost aerospace agencies is the Na-
tional Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA. I would like to focus the re-
mainder of my remarks today on NASAs aeronautics research programs.
Let me begin by saying that NASAs research is fundamental to achieving signifi-
cant breakthroughs in aeronautics. That is partially because NASA has many
unique core competencies, but also because its research horizon is long term, very
high risk, and not the kind of research that could be justified by a commercial enter-
prise.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
40
NASA research is focused at the pre-competitive stage, well before commercial
products are developed. In fact, experience has shown that a company may still need
to invest hundreds of million of dollars to bring to the marketplace a technology
NASA has designated as ready for commercialization.
NASAs Aeronautics Programs
Today NASA is involved in a number of important research programs that have
the potential to benefits the entire aviation industry, including general aviation. I
would like to highlight some of these programs.
Propulsion
Historically, propulsion has been a key aerospace technology. Dramatic advances
in airplane capabilities are often the result of breakthroughs in engine technology,
such as when went from heavy radial engines, to light weight piston engines, to tur-
bojets and then to fuel-efficient turbofans.
Today, the environmental impact of aviation operations is a significant constraint
on aviation growth because many communities are concerned about aircraft noise
and emissions. These concerns prevent the expansion of airport infrastructures that
could reduce or eliminate delays. They also force our Federal Government to spend
hundreds of millions of dollars per year soundproofing individual homes around
large airports. This kind of federal approach to noise mitigation is a little like re-
sponding to a water problem by buying mops rather than fixing the leak. As a coun-
try, we need to spend more on NASA Quiet Aircraft Technology and Ultra-Efficient
Engine programs.
The NASA Advanced Subsonic Technology (AST) Noise Reduction Program has re-
sulted in technologies that are already being used on todays airplanes to lower
noise at the source. This includes engine noise reduction from advanced inlet liners
and exit nozzles and airplane noise reduction from advancements in aerodynamic
wing design and reduced-weight composite materials. The Quiet Aircraft Technology
(QAT) Program will build upon the AST research into the next decade in support
of NASAs goal to significantly reducing the environmental impact of aircraft noise
on the community. In 2002, NASA and FAA initiated a new memorandum of agree-
ment (MOA) to coordinate research activities and increase funding in support of the
QAT program to speed up the introduction of lower noise aircraft technologies.
GAMA strongly supports the coordination of FAAs Research Engineering & Devel-
opment Program for Environment and Energy and NASAs noise and emissions re-
search programs to remove barriers to the growth of the aviation industry and accel-
erate environmental benefits to the community.
Vehicle Program
NASA has envisioned expanding their Vehicles Program to develop technologies
that will remove roadblocks to a vast range of aircraft, bring significant new capa-
bilities and benefits to our air transportation system. But unless NASA is author-
ized to spend significantly more to develop these vehicle-enabling technologies, we
will continue to lose our technology edge.
NAS Transformation
While the FAA has done an admirable job of planning upgrades to the NAS for
the next ten years, NASA should undertake the types of research that will meet the
needs of our air transportation system beyond the FAAs planning horizon. Key to
this process would be establishing a joint program office to coordinate the aviation-
related research activities of NASA, FAA, DOT, DoD and other government agen-
cies.
Air Traffic Management
No where is the need for a coordinated national vision for aerospace more appar-
ent than in the work NASA does in the air traffic control area. The Multi-Center
Traffic Management Area is an example where common goals and objectives have
resulted in excellent products that can be rapidly implemented by the FAA. But
other areas, such as airspace modeling, the lack of coordination and a shared vision
is quite apparent. We are especially concerned that the Virtual Airspace Modeling
and Simulation Project, known as VAMS, will consume an inordinate amount of
NASAs resources, and many of these resources seem to duplicate those within the
FAA.
Clearly, NASA has capabilities and facilities that FAA does not have, and it
makes no sense to duplicate these capabilities and facilities within our government.
In the area of air traffic control, NASA is essentially a longer-term research agency
for the FAA. But FAAs horizon is, and should be much shorter-term than NASAs.
So it is essential that NASAs role should include pushing the envelope in air traf-
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
41
fic control technologies, often beyond what can been seen from todays perspectives.
This role is often difficult for the FAA.
Without a single, clear roadmap for aeronautics that cuts across all parts of our
government, resources will be wasted and time lost.
In addition to the current NASA programs, we believe there is additional NASA
research which would be extremely beneficial to the aeronautics industry.
Software Certification
One new area where NASAs expertise would be especially useful is development
of software tools that could be used by the FAA and avionics manufacturers to test
avionics and other computer software used in the NAS to ascertain that it meets
appropriate certification levels of reliability and integrity. NASA research in this
area should be greatly accelerated and closely coordinated with the FAA, which is
the organization that determines the minimum performance standards.
Weather Sensors
Another area where NASA research has great value is advanced weather sensors
that can measure temperature and dew point from satellites at altitudes not typi-
cally traveled by airline aircraft. At lower altitudes, specially-equipped balloons are
used to gather this data. And above 29,000 feet, many airline aircraft are equipped
with sensors and automatic datalink of temperature, dew point and other data. But
between approximately 10,000 to 29,000 feet, weather data is very sparse.
It is not economically feasible to equip smaller general aviation aircraft that nor-
mally fly between 10,000 and 29,000 feet altitudes with sensors and data link, and
balloons are not feasible at these altitudes. And although the weather forecast mod-
els employed by the National Weather Service have greatly improved, they are still
impaired by the fact that measurements of temperature and dew point in the middle
altitudes are sparse. Forecasts derived from these models would be greatly en-
hanced if more accurate, real-time temperature and dew point data was available.
Nearly all of the weather products produced by the National Weather Service would
be enhanced, including many for non-aviation purposes. But most importantly to
GAMA, general aviation safety would be improved.
NASAs General Aviation Research
As a representative of the general aviation industry, I would also like to take the
opportunity today to mention some of the NASA programs which have been specifi-
cally focused on general aviation.
The Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiment (AGATE) was a NASA cost
sharing partnership with industry to recreate and speed-up the technological basis
for revitalization of the U.S. general aviation industry. The goal of the program was
to develop affordable new technology, as well as the industry standards and certifi-
cation methods for airframe, cockpit and flight training systems for next generation,
single pilot, 46 place, near all-weather light airplanes.
AGATE focused attention on moving technology that had been available only to
commercial air carriers into general aviation aircraft. NASA and industry worked
closely with FAA to bring electronic display regulations into line with current tech-
nology. As a result of this government-industry partnership, many new technologies
were either brought to the market, or they were commercialized much sooner than
would have been the case without AGATE. For a detailed discussion of how effec-
tively this research was commercialized, I have attached a copy of the AGATE Alli-
ance Commercialization Impact Report. * Perhaps the biggest lesson learned from
AGATE was that NASA can be an effective research partner with industry.
Another success was NASAs General Aviation Propulsion (GAP) program aimed
at developing revolutionary new propulsion systems for general aviation. Histori-
cally, it is new engines that have brought about the greatest changes in aircraft de-
sign and performance. At the entry level of general aviation, some very exciting new
engines are on the verge of reaching the market.
NASAs GAP program is an excellent example of how NASA research brings tech-
nologies to the point where industry can later refine NASA breakthrough tech-
nologies and develop commercially-viable products.
Small Aircraft Transportation System
NASAs Small Aircraft Transportation System (SATS) initiative is a program to
demonstrate how the integration of many next-generation technologies can improve
air access to small communities. This program envisions travel between remote com-
munities and urban areas by utilizing a new generation of single-pilot light aircraft
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
42
for personal and business transportation between the nations 5,400 public use gen-
eral aviation airports.
Current NASA investments in aircraft technologies are enabling industry to bring
affordable, safe, and easy-to-use technologies to the marketplace, including ad-
vanced flight controls, innovative avionics, crashworthy composite airframes, more
efficient IFR flight training, and revolutionary engines.
The SATS program is focusing on four key operating capabilities, which we fully
support:
Safe, high-volume operations at airports without control towers or terminal
radar facilities;
Lower adverse weather landing minimums at minimally-equipped landing facili-
ties;
Integration of advanced general aviation aircraft into a higher en route capacity
air traffic control system, with complex flows that can safely and efficiently ac-
commodate a wide range of aircraft with diverse performance characteristics;
Improved single-pilot ability to function safely and competently in complex air-
space in the evolving National Airspace System.
It should go without saying that NASAs technical expertise is an essential ele-
ment of the SATS initiative. Only NASA can cut across traditional technical bound-
aries and integrate research benefiting general aviation vehicles, air traffic control
procedures, airspace design and safety. And more than any other government agen-
cy, NASA has already demonstrated an ability to implement an effective consortium
of government and industry that can produce results. This ability is due in large
part to various collaborative research structures that are uniquely at NASAs dis-
posal.
We believe that at the conclusion of the SATS program in FY05, many of these
technologies will be mature enough to be handed-off to the FAA for final develop-
ment and deployment, and we are working with the FAA to develop such a program.
Technologies that result from the SATS program will greatly enhance the capacity
of the National Airspace system.
Conclusion
Mr. Chairman, NASA is a preeminent research agency with much to contribute
to the future of the aerospace industry. The challenge for all of us as stakeholders,
including this Subcommittee, will be to make sure NASA programs fit into a broad
national aerospace plan and are of value to the industry.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I would be happy to answer any
questions you might have.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
43
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
44
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
45
space leadership by implementing the Commissions recommendations. I commend
the Committees initiative, as reflected in todays hearing, to begin the important
implementation process. I also commend Senator Allen and Senator Dodd for their
strong support of aerospace technology and their recently introduced legislation in
this area.
For the remainder of my time, I will address two, interrelated recommendations
of the Aerospace Commission. First, the Federal Government should significantly in-
crease its investment in basic aerospace research, which enhances U.S. national se-
curity, enables breakthrough capabilities, and fosters an efficient, secure and safe
aerospace transportation system. This is a very high priority for the Boeing Com-
pany. Second, I will address the Commission recommendation to effect the trans-
formation of the U.S. air transportation system as a national priority. This must re-
sult in reducing door-to-door travel times of our citizens, and implementation of this
recommendation is Boeings highest aerospace research priority.
Aerospace systems protect us from those who would do us harm, and connect us
to our loved ones across the country and around the globe. The Aerospace Commis-
sion observed that the aerospace industry is a powerful force within the U.S. econ-
omy, contributing over 15 percent to our Gross Domestic Product, supporting over
15 million high quality American jobs, while generating the largest trade surplus
of any manufacturing sector.
There are a great many challenges affecting aerospace today. These include new
national security threats around the globe, cyclical commercial aviation markets, the
need for a more secure, efficient, environmentally-friendly and capable aviation sys-
tem, and safer, lower cost and more reliable access to spacea challenge under-
scored by the recent Shuttle Columbia tragedy, to name but a few. Government and
industry are both doing their best to deal with these issues and to respond to the
needs of their stakeholders. Our nation needs to remain a leader in space, and in-
vestment is required to take our nation to a new level of safety, affordability and
scientific research.
In our free enterprise economy, there is a proper role for government in each of
these challenges. The Commission correctly defined governments role as recognizing
the importance of aerospace leadership, creating a supportive policy framework, and
increasing federal investment.
For national security, aviation system security, and civil space, the government
investment role extends from funding enabling technology to procuring and oper-
ating systems. Let me note that The Boeing Company believes providing for the se-
curity of the air transportation system is a proper role of government, with re-
sources coming from the general fund rather than the aviation trust fund.
For commercial products, the government role is properly limited to its historical
role of supporting break-through, pre-competitive, fundamental research that has a
longer time horizongenerally more than three to five yearsthan industry can
support before it is mature enough to be considered for transition to product devel-
opment.
Government, including NASA, the DoD, FAA and the new Department of Home-
land Security, must continue to strengthen its partnerships so that the benefits of
aeronautics and space technologies can be leveraged, transferred, and applied swift-
ly where they are needed to meet our economic and security needs.
Mr. Chairman, the Boeing Company strongly supports the conclusion of the Aero-
space Commission that an aggressive initiative by the Federal Government to invest
in aerospace leadership would benefit the United States. There are broad public
benefits to be derived from federal investment in advanced test facilities, propulsion,
fuel systems, and fuel efficiency technologies, advanced materials, advanced struc-
tures, safety and security related technologies, environmentally friendly technologies
related to noise, emissions and cabins, and technologies related to subsonic and, in
the longer term, supersonic flight. I understand the pressures on the overall federal
budget in this time of national crisis. Nonetheless, I am disappointed that the FY
2004 NASA request for the Aerospace Technology Enterprise in the NASA budget
continues the trend of declining investment in real terms for the future of Americas
aerospace leadership.
A key step in maturing and proving advanced aeronautical technology is to incor-
porate it into scaled, prototype flight demonstrators. Demonstrators are particularly
valuable in that they provide a test bed to mature technologies that, in turn, maxi-
mize the potential for deploying technological advances to serve the nations press-
ing aviation needs. High priority demonstrators, for example, are needed for tech-
nologies that greatly (1) improve overall performance efficiency and, thereby, reduce
travel time and air transportations impact on the environment: (2) enhance access
and mobility to stimulate economic growth; and (3) improve our economic security
by decreasing our dependency on fossil fuels through the development of alternative
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
46
fuel systems such as hydrogen. By focusing on a range of technologies that can be
applied to demonstrators, a more significant and timely return on investment is
achieved.
Turning to a related key finding of the Presidents Commission on the Future of
the United States Aerospace Industry, productivity growth and our gross domestic
product are directly related to an efficient and growing air transportation system.
As I noted at the beginning, implementation of this finding is Boeings highest pri-
ority for federal research investment.
Aviation system delays are projected to increase, creating a severe drag on eco-
nomic growth in coming years. U.S. aviation system delays in 2000, as measured
by the FAA, resulted in a $9.4 billion loss in U.S. economic activity.
The decline in air travel and system delays following 9/11 is temporary. Fore-
casters agree that growth in demand for air transportation ultimately will return
to much higher historic levels, and will outpace available and currently planned ca-
pacity.
The U.S. economy will suffer without adequate government action to improve the
air transportation system. Aviation is highly dependent on an airport and airspace
infrastructure financed primarily by system users and controlled and regulated by
the government. This infrastructure does not meet future efficiency, capacity, or se-
curity requirements.
The Commission concluded that the FAAs Operational Evolution Plan (OEP) is
a necessary starting point, but insufficient for enhancing the U.S. air transportation
system and maintaining global aviation leadership. The one billion dollar annual in-
vestment in the OEP will not produce sufficient capacity to meet long-term demand,
nor will it take full advantage of technologies that can enhance the security of the
overall aviation system. According to a DRIWEFA study, if all projects envisioned
by the OEP were completed on schedule, airspace delays in 2012 would be greater
than in 2000, and the economic cost of delays between 2000 and 2012 would be an
estimated $157 billion.
The Boeing Company strongly supports the recommendation of the Aerospace
Commission for a national program office led by the Department of Transportation
with multi-agency participation. The goal of this initiative is to define and develop
a new air traffic management system to meet our long-term aviation security, safe-
ty, efficiency and capacity needs.
A national air traffic management initiative should build upon current air traffic
management and infrastructure initiatives, including the OEP, use a requirements
driven systems approach, develop a highly integrated, secure network centric ar-
chitecture to enhance common situational awareness for all valid system users, and
ensure seamless global operations. New and clearly identified funding for this initia-
tive is needed. In light of current economic crisis and declining aviation trust fund
revenues, the initiative should leverage investments and capabilities from non-tradi-
tional sources such as NASA, DoD, TSA, and DOT.
While I have not focused on space today, NASA aerospace research also contrib-
utes to safer, more reliable and lower cost access to space. President Bush told a
mourning nation that our journey into space will continue despite the tragic events
of February 1st. Fundamental technology challenges remain in the space flight
arena, including lighter weight, lower cost airframes, propulsion, and health man-
agement systems. The FY 2004 NASA Aerospace budget proposals to address these
needs should be supported, and necessarily will receive more emphasis when we bet-
ter understand the causes of the catastrophic loss of Space Shuttle Columbia.
Mr. Chairman, the investment of public funds demands public benefit in return.
I will close by citing some of the public benefits of federal investment in aerospace
research. They include improving the quality of life for our citizens by drastically
reducing the level of noise due to aircraft operations; reducing the congestion of the
air transportation system; reducing the rate at which fossil fuels are consumed and
greenhouse gases and other harmful gases and particulates are added to the atmos-
phere by aircraft; allowing for more rapid, cost-effective development of safer, lower
cost, more efficient aerospace, automotive and energy producing products; enabling
low-cost, safe, and low-emission propulsion systems; improving performance for op-
erators, and in turn reducing costs to the flying public; reducing the aircraft acci-
dent rate by 50 percent over the next ten years; increasing the mobility of our popu-
lation that, in turn, stimulates economic growth; and advancing flight, and with it,
aerospace leadership.
Finally, Mr. Chairman, I congratulate the Congress for its willingness to consider
the recommendations of the Aerospace Commission. I respectfully suggest that the
Congress engage as a full partner in their implementation. This partnership will re-
quire a long-term view of the Nations investment in aerospace technology and the
return on that investment to the American taxpayer. Past investments have surely
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
47
improved the lives of all Americans. In a year in which we celebrate the 100th Anni-
versary of Flight and mourn the loss of the Shuttle Columbia astronauts, we can
pay no greater tribute to Americas aerospace pioneers than by securing Americas
economic and physical security with another century of aerospace leadership.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to responding to your questions and
questions from other Members of the Committee.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
48
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
49
PREPARED STATEMENT OF JOHN TOMBLIN, PH.D., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL
INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH, WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity
to share my observations and vision on the future of the United States Aerospace
Industry with you today. My comments this afternoon will focus on the role of aca-
demia in partnership with government and industry and how that effective collabo-
ration can propel the future of the United States Aerospace Industry.
Aviation and the Global Economy
The United States has been the world leader in aviation throughout the 20th Cen-
tury. Americas aviation industry has designed and built commercial, general avia-
tion, and military aircraft used around the world, with exports resulting in a net
favorable trade balance. Today the aviation industry competes in a global economic
environment that is far different from that of the past. New challenges to our lead-
ership are arising from aircraft manufacturers in Europe, the Pacific Rim, and
Brazil. For example, the commercial airplane industry must now compete against
the European Union (13 countries). The balance of trade in the aviation industry
has shrunk from $41 billion in 1998 to $26 billion in 2001. Furthermore, new for-
eign government-supported research and test facilities, particularly in Europe, are
attracting business from United States aircraft companies because of availability,
quality of results, rapid response, and low costs.
To address this competition, the nations research and development base for air-
craft design and manufacturing must be expanded with support from the Federal
Government in partnership with industry. The need for federal support of new re-
search and test facilities and equipment is as acute as it is for basic and applied
research. It is only through research and the application of new technology in aero-
dynamics, materials and structures, and aviation safety that the U.S. will maintain
its leadership position in aviation throughout the 21st Century.
According to the Milken Institutes report of July 1999, entitled Americas High-
Tech Economy, Wichita, Kansas ranks 19th in the nation among high-tech metro-
politan areas because of the citys high concentration of aviation industry. Wichita
is second in the nation among aircraft and parts metros on the same basis. Prior
to September 11, 2001, Boeing, Bombardier-Learjet, Cessna Aircraft, and Raytheon
Aircraft provided more than 43,000 jobs and a $2.1 billion annual payroll to the
Kansas economy. The public is returning to commercial aviation as the only viable
choice for long-distance travel, and both commercial and general aviation are ex-
pected to recover from the recent economic downturn.
While the four major aviation manufacturers dominate employment in south cen-
tral Kansas, there are 1,800 smaller manufacturing shops in the 13-county region
surrounding Wichita. In addition, economists estimate that there are 2.6 jobs out-
side aerospace for every direct job within aerospace.
Wichita State University and the National Institute for Aviation Research
Wichita State University (WSU) is located in the metropolitan setting of Wichita,
Kansas and has partnered with local industry for the past 65 years. According to
the National Science Foundation, WSU ranked seventh in the nation in aerospace
research expenditures in 2000. The National Institute for Aviation Research (NIAR)
was established on campus in 1985 to help address the aviation industrys research
needs and has become a model for federal-state-industry-university partnerships.
NIAR is designated as a Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation (KTEC) Cen-
ter of Excellence, and is a partner in two FAA centers, the Airworthiness Assurance
Center of Excellence and the Center of Excellence for General Aviation Research.
The Institute was the recipient of the 2001 FAA Excellence in Research Award for
its continuing contributions to aviation research, and its ability to partner with in-
dustry, academia, and government. NIAR, through its ties with industry, other uni-
versities, KTEC, and federal agencies provides an ideal focus for federal and state
support to accomplish mutual goals for world leadership in aviation.
NIARs mission is to conduct research, transfer technology, and enhance education
for the purpose of advancing the nations aviation industries. Located in a cluster
of aviation industries, the Institute must be able to meet the research, testing, and
technology transfer needs of these industries and the federal agencies that support
aviation and establish certification regulations for the industry. With the assistance
of an industry advisory board consisting of vice presidents of engineering of the local
aviation manufacturers, NIAR has established thrust areas that are of primary im-
portance to the industries, and plans to upgrade and expand its capabilities within
these thrust areas. The thrust areas are as follows:
Aerodynamics
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
50
Aging Aircraft
Composites & Advanced Materials
Crashworthiness
Icing
Manufacturing
Structures
Virtual Reality
Partnerships With Industry and Government
Permit me to review some of the Institutes previous success stories which in-
volved forming a strong collaboration between academia, industry and government.
One of the most successful partnerships developed as a result of NASAs focus on
general aviation. The Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiment (AGATE)
was a NASA cost-sharing partnership with industry to create the technological basis
for revitalization of the general aviation industry in the United States. The goal of
the program was to develop affordable new technology as well as the industry stand-
ards and certification methods for airframe, cockpit and flight training systems for
next generation single pilot, 46 place, near all-weather light airplanes. I was chair-
man of the advanced materials working group from 1994 until the program ended
in 2001.
During this time, the partnership with academia, industry, the FAA, and NASA
helped establish certification standards for composite materials that revolutionized
the way in which they are certified and used on aircraft by creating a series of com-
posite material databases. Through these shared databases, a manufacturer can se-
lect an approved composite material system to fabricate parts and perform a smaller
subset of testing for a specific application. Through the joint collaboration of two
government agencies, the FAA and NASA, we were able to reduce the time required
for certification of new composite materials by a factor of four and the cost of certifi-
cation by a factor of ten. This model of composite material incorporation in applica-
tions and products has recently been adopted in the commercial transport and mili-
tary aerospace industry as well.
Typically, each company desiring to use a composite material in a product design
must conduct a qualification process for the material in order to verify its properties
and characteristics. Even for identical material systems, each company usually se-
lects a different customized qualification process leading to a very detailed and ex-
pensive procedure for each company. This cost increases further as other procedures
must be established for structural testing, manufacturing control and repair proce-
dures.
Thus, most programs are limited to using materials previously qualified for other
programs which leads to using older, out-dated material and not taking advantage
of the latest technology and material advances in the industry. A solution to this
problem, as witnessed by the AGATE program is to establish a national localized
center for composite material validation and quality assurance.
It is also worthwhile to note the paradigm shift that occurred as part of the
AGATE program. Typically, one would think it better to spend federal research and
development funding on larger commercial or military programs to advance the
state-of-the-art. However, from collaboration with industry, government and aca-
demia, the AGATE program was able to achieve a paradigm shift by spending fewer
research dollars in the general aviation market and applying the technology to large
commercial transport and military programs. This is the case of small aircraft tech-
nology spinning up into large, complex aircraft designs and providing more cost-
effective ways to achieve advanced performance as well as reduced costs. The appli-
cation and transfer of these advanced technologies are easier and faster in the gen-
eral aviation and business jet community than in the large transport and military
community.
Currently, Raytheon Aircraft Company is applying these advanced composite tech-
nologies on a new line of business jets, one of which is already certified and being
produced. Cessna Aircraft Company, even in the present economic hardship of the
aerospace world, announced at the National Business Aircraft Association meeting
in September that it would be producing three new business jets. Using new tech-
nologies in applications that improve product performance and safety is essential in
the 21st centurys global market.
Another important research area in the aerospace industry is aircraft crash-
worthiness. In a 1995 aircraft market survey, analysts determined that safety is the
primary concern among of general aviation aircraft pilots and passengers. For pilots,
the level of safety offered by the aircraft was said to be the primary decision factor
when purchasing a light airplane. For potential pilots (the latent market for air-
planes and flight services), a lack of safety was the primary reason for not piloting
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
51
light airplanes. And for potential passengers, a perceived lack of safety was the pri-
mary reason for not wanting to travel in light airplanes. The respondents of this
survey were not given a definition of the term safety; they were allowed to use their
own definition in formulating their response. Even though there were nearly as
many concepts defining safety as there were people surveyed, safety can be broadly
categorized into two areas. The first is control and minimization of factors that
cause accidents, or accident prevention. The second is control and minimization of
the factors that cause injury once an accident occurs, or injury mitigation. Designing
for crashworthiness addresses this second category of safety.
Customer concern over the safety of general aviation aircraft is warranted, to
some extent. Although declining, the accident rate of general aviation aircraft re-
mains relatively high and the average number of general aviation accident-related
fatalities remains significantly higher than other forms of air transportation. If gen-
eral aviation or air transportation is to grow significantly and become the alter-
native to the hub and spoke air transportation system that the Commission report
envisions, perceived and real safety must improve. The latent market (people inter-
ested in general aviation but not currently using it) will not participate without a
stronger perception of safety. The general public has come to expect crash safety in
their cars, and will likely demand the same from light airplanes.
Furthermore, crash safety at aviation velocities has been demonstrated in
racecars and in full-scale small airplane and helicopter tests. While many of the im-
provements in overall safety should come from accident prevention through such
areas as enhancements in the airspace infrastructure, flight systems, training, etc.,
the automotive experience has shown that privately owned and operated vehicles
will continue to crash. A zero accident rate is not likely. The automotive industry
has accepted this reality and designed crashworthiness into its cars; consequently,
thousands of lives are saved each year. By designing crashworthiness into light air-
planes, general aviation can see similar results. NIAR is currently working with the
FAA, NASA and the aerospace industry to develop and validate the analytical tools
necessary to incorporate crashworthiness features into aircraft during the concept
phase of development.
One of the most successful crashworthiness stories occurred just three months ago
in Texas where a pilot in a Cirrus Design SR22 lost control of his aircraft mid-flight
due to an aileron failure. Typically, this would have resulted in a fatality but in-
stead resulted in an uninjured pilot who was able to walk away from the crash.
Using a ballistic recovery parachute, which is a relatively new technology for small
aircraft and was developed in a partnership with the FAA and the NASASBIR pro-
gram, the pilot was able to safely deploy the parachute over an unpopulated area
and turn an otherwise fatal event into an unfortunate accident.
In-flight icing also has a significant impact on the safety, operation, development
and certification of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. In addition, icing hampers
the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles used for commercial and military appli-
cations. Recent accidents, such as the American Eagle ATR72 in Roselawn, Indi-
ana, in October 1994, and the Delta Connection (Comair) Embraer 120, near Ida,
Michigan, in January 1997, which resulted in 97 fatalities, show that icing con-
tinues to be a serious safety concern. In fact since 1986, more than 300 fatalities
have been attributed to icing-related airline accidents. Furthermore, the costs asso-
ciated with aircraft design, testing and certification for icing are very high, espe-
cially for general aviation aircraft manufacturers. These costs are typically in the
range of $5 to $10 million for a business jet aircraft. Research is needed to enhance
aircraft safety and to reduce aircraft icing design and certification costs.
Wichita State University is currently one of the leading universities in the U.S.
in aircraft icing research and continues to collaborate with government and industry
to enhance aircraft safety and utility and to provide industry with the tools needed
for reducing aircraft development and certification costs. During the last 20 years,
researchers at WSU have been conducted more than 18 collaborative icing research
programs involving NASA, FAA and the aviation industry. A number of these re-
search efforts were in direct response to the 1997 NASA Aviation Safety Program,
of which the goal is to reduce the aviation fatal accident rate by a factor of 10 by
the year 2022. Collaborative icing research programs have resulted in a number of
products ranging from aircraft ice protection systems, databases for aircraft design
and certification, aircraft test methodologies, simulation tools for aircraft design,
and pilot training aids.
As noted in the Commission report, human factors research must be a continued
consideration. The Institute is presently focused on investigating ways to improve
maintenance documentation available to personnel. Maintenance errors have been
identified as a major contributing cause in approximately 12 percent of major air-
craft accidents. The perception was that maintenance manuals are laden with er-
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
52
rors. However, results from a study funded by the FAA Airworthiness Assurance
Center of Excellence (AACE) showed that airline companies adequately provide
valid and appropriate content. The problem lies in the cumbersome way in which
the material is presented. Manuals should be prepared in a more user-friendly for-
mat, allowing ease in finding the relevant technical documentation and improved se-
quencing of information for complex maintenance procedures. Technical writers
must be familiar with how aviation maintenance is performed in order to effectively
describe complex procedures.
One of the unexpected outcomes the human factors research program was the de-
velopment of an education program to offer an Associate of Arts degree specializing
in aviation technical writing. This new program at Wichita State University is de-
signed to provide students with special aviation training so they can better under-
stand how to effectively communicate maintenance instruction in the manuals. The
program was created through a joint effort of WSU, the Wichita Area Chamber of
Commerce and the Wichita Area Technical College (WATC). Local aviation manufac-
turers including Cessna, Raytheon and Bombardier, supported the program through
research and program development that designed the curriculum and coursework.
In another collaborative effort, the Institute and Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Wichita Division are currently in the process of completing research on the effects
of manufacturing defects on composite nacelle structure. This program was success-
ful in reducing the cost of repairs and improving the first pass yield. It has also
provided a substantial database for assessing damage that occurs in the fleet.
A relatively new quality assurance inspection technology has been investigated in
the research and appears attractive for in-process manufacturing inspection. Fur-
ther research aimed at facilitizing the technique for use in aircraft production may
result in a small business opportunity for producing associated equipment.
Another important area that requires serious investigation is the current aging
aircraft problem. Economic and market conditions of present-day airline companies
are requiring the use of commercial and military airplanes far beyond their original
design life expectancies. The general aviation fleet consists of more than 215,000
aircraft, of which more than 25,000 are over 50 years of age and are still flying and
being resold. This aging airplane concern is being amplified as more airline compa-
nies use aged aircraft and rely on standard inspection practices for a guarantee of
airworthiness assurance. NIAR recently opened a new laboratory that will focus on
the integrity and aging aspects of small airplanes in commuter service. With fund-
ing through the FAA Airworthiness Assurance Center of Excellence and in partner-
ship with several original equipment manufacturers and airline companies, this new
laboratory will explore aging concerns in the commuter aircraft fleet and establish
guidance to ensure that current maintenance programs of small general aviation
airplanes are providing acceptable levels of continued airworthiness.
Commission Report on the Future of the Aeropsace Industry
In conclusion, I know we all agree that the future of aerospace is critical to na-
tional security, transportation mobility and freedom, economic well-being and qual-
ity of life for the American people. The Commissions sense of urgency to address
the needs of the aerospace industry cannot be ignored. Americas leadership in aero-
space is becoming threatened.
On December 17th, 1903, the brothers Wilbur and Orville Wright flew their
Wright Flyer from level ground under engine power alone and made aviation history
for the United States. It would be historically appropriate if the world dominance
of the United States Aerospace Industry could be assured for the next 100 years
through new and dynamic federal programs and policies.
I would like to thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I would be happy
to answer any questions you might have.
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
53
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
54
Mr. DIETZ. I think there are two answers to the question. I think
one answer to the question is, yes, there was, I think, in some
cases in the past, a more steady and predictable research activity
that was out in front. The other thing I think needs to be recog-
nized, we are talking very significant material properties from the
materials/processes historically used in building airplanes. We are
now working with materials and matrixes of those materials that
are whole new materials systems. They create all new challenges
for the structures they are used in. And, therefore, the ability to
create the basic research that is substantial enough to transition
to a product is a greater jump than it has been historically because
of significant changes.
It goes back again to changing that productivity model. We can-
not just make incremental improvements to the same old process,
and it is time we have to make step-function improvements, and
that is driving some of these new material, process and system
changes.
Senator BROWNBACK. Ed, did you have some comment on this?
Mr. Bolen?
Mr. BOLEN. Well, I think when we looked at this from the com-
mission, one of the things that we saw as somewhat of a historical
shift. I think we felt that 30 years ago a lot of the goals of the
space program, the military, the civil aviation, were roughly the
same. We wanted to fly a little bit further, we wanted to fly higher,
we wanted to fly faster. I think what we have seen more recently
is that the end goals of some of our different disciplines are dif-
ferent.
The military, for example, is now very interested in stealth tech-
nology. That is not something that spins off well to the commercial
side.
Senator BROWNBACK. I am particularly interested in that.
Mr. BOLEN. The commercial sideno, I mean, the commercial
side is very interested in flying quieter and flying cleaner. Well,
that is not to say the military does not care about it, but that is
certainly not their first priority. That is not how we have set it up.
So I think we have had a divergence of goals so they do not natu-
rallythe technology does not naturally flow back and forth as well
as it could.
But I think we do havecertainly with the general aviation com-
munity and NASA, I think we learned through the program, the
AGATE program that was discussed, we did learn that collabora-
tion and cost sharing was very, very helpful. But I do not think you
can ever have too much collaboration communication.
What we need to do is have the industry talking to NASA about
the type of basic research, pre-competitive level research, that we
need done. Then let the companies themselves try to take those
products and make them marketable, but also working with the
FAA to know that, hey, if we got this technology
Senator BROWNBACK. It could be certified.
Mr. BOLEN.could it be certified? And we do not know that. And
so I think what we need iswe have got better communication
now, but we need to have all the Federal agencies talking to each
other, and we need to have industry involved, and I think that is
a fundamental part of the commission report at every levelbetter
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
55
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
56
tination is. You are not going the most direct route, and there are
issues of safety. But if you could go directly from Point A to B, in-
stead of Point A to C and then to B in the process, how much trav-
el time could we take off of flights going middle of the country,
from the East or West Coast to the middle of the country, orhow
much time are you talking about if we just use current technology
and did it very safely, though, in a safe way?
Mr. DIETZ. The point-to-point, obviously, eliminates congestion in
the hubs. And so that, in and of itself, creates some opportunities
to make a more manageable airspace. So that is certainly an ele-
ment of the capacity. But the other part of the capacity is man-
aging that capacity, as well, dealing with the human factors that
air traffic controllers and others have to deal with in managing
that and really linking all the elements of the system together to
where it is a truly network-centric type of operation.
Senator BROWNBACK. Like how much could we cut off the travel
time from Washington National to Kansas City if you had a more
efficient air traffic system? Just to make it personal.
[Laughter.]
Senator BROWNBACK. Just for example. I am calculating, here,
my weekly commute.
Mr. DIETZ. Well, obviously, if it is a direct flight, the whole issue
with door-to-door time is how soon do you have to get to the airport
ahead of time, what kind of security issues do you have to deal
with at the airport, what kind of issues does congestion in the air-
port deal with leaving on time and arriving on time? So it is a little
difficult to speculate
Senator BROWNBACK. Just the air travel from once we take off
to once we land?
Mr. DIETZ. I believe the air travel would be relatively the same.
Senator BROWNBACK. Okay. Is that the case of most that is point-
to-point, and the hubs
Mr. DIETZ. Obviously, as you talk about longer distances, the
ability to go point to point versus through a hub now enables you
to stop the whole landing/takeoff pattern and the whole wait time
in the airport and everything else, so that is when you begin to
really affect the travel time, is by eliminating that stop in between.
Senator BROWNBACK. Senator Allen?
Senator ALLEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, all
three gentlemen, for your insightful testimony. It is great to hear
the various perspectives. And, Mr. Dietz, thank you for your sup-
port of the measure that Senator Dodd and I are introducing. And
it is good to hear your views. There are different aspects of this,
not just funding just across the board, there is focus on aircraft
noise, fuel efficiency, emissions, research and development for civil
supersonic transport which will necessarily be a function of propul-
sion if you are going to get up to supersonic. Sure, you can do the
aeronautic aspect of it or the avionics and so forth, but you need
to have the engine, whatever the propulsion system is.
We do have rotor-craft research and development, as well, not
something brought up here, scholarships for those who are study-
ing in masters degree programs, and aeronautical engineering,
weather, air traffic managementit is very important. And I have
seen at NASALangley how some of the ideas on noise and better
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
57
air traffic management and how they are working, that theytake
OHare Airport; it is not theory how the noise pattern or the
amount of noise, areas affected by noise, would be reducedas well
as better air traffic management, because it is getting more and
more crowded. It is not just commercial aviation. It is general avia-
tion, as well. And all of these, I think, are very important, and we
have to increase our funding there and work in collaboration with
the private sector, with colleges and universities, as well as a vari-
ety of governmental organizations, whether it is NASA, whether it
is FAA, whether it is the Department of Defense.
Dr. Tomblin, let me ask you this question. You summarized your
remarks. In your written testimony that I was reading before, and
you alluded to it, that the aviation industry today competes inter-
nationally. We have been talking about that and competition and
how that is important and that it is different than it was in the
past. Could you share with us or discuss with us the differences
that you see, as far as that competition? And also, in doing so,
could you share with us any observations you may have where oth-
ers outside of the United States do a better job somehow than we
do, and can we learn from that, or does it really matter?
Dr. TOMBLIN. I think that a lot of the people that have testified
here today have touched on this. And my experience in dealing
with this actually comes personally. I mean, doing some consulting
with foreign aircraft companies.
And as Ed mentioned and Dennis mentioned, too, I see the
United States industry, when I personally look at it, having a five-
year vision. They have a five-year vision out. What changes is that
I see the global competition having the hundred-year vision. And
they will send a research product back that is ready to go to mar-
ketthey will send it completely backthat, in my opinion, is to-
tally new technologyback to the drawing board to get more cost
out and greatly affect the performance when they already have a
superior product to anything we produce. So that worries me, that
not only do they have this step, but they are making this step-func-
tion approach. So that we still have the leadership now, I think,
but it is becoming threatened if we do not do something.
Senator ALLEN. Now, is that a function of corporate strategy or
the? As you say, well, we look at it for five years, they look at it
a hundred years.
Dr. TOMBLIN. And I think it is
Senator ALLEN. Is that governmental? Is that corporate? Or is it?
Dr. TOMBLIN. I think it ispersonally, I see it as corporate. I
mean, they have the money to throw into the research and develop-
ment, where our companies do not put that much basic research
funding in, not as much as, like, thelike you see from the auto-
mobile industry.
Senator ALLEN. Well, I cannot recollect which one of youI was
going through the testimony. Maybe it was Mr. Bolen, or maybe
you, yourself, pointing out where NASAs value is, is the basic re-
search, and then the private sector comes in and figures out how
to adapt that research to some commercial value.
Now, it is not as if whatNASAs research would not have any
application. Much of it will. But sometimes you get adaptations of
utilization of that research, basic research, which maybe it is some-
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
58
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
59
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
60
space industry, which I want to see it be. And you have provided
us good thoughts and good food for thought.
We have several legislative vehicles that will be looked at. It was
mentioned here today, the AllenDodd bill. There will be some view
towards funding for research efforts. And please feel free to contact
our officeothers, the Committeeabout where you think the best
placement of effort and sources would be so that we can be secure
in moving forward and maintaining the lead in this very, very vital
field for our economy, for our future, for our safety and our travel,
and also for our security.
Thank you for coming. Thank you for traveling here. Thank you
all for attending.
The hearing is adjourned.
[Whereupon, at 4:30 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.]
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF
A P P E N D I X
(61)
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:08 May 16, 2005 Jkt 096511 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6611 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\96511.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF