Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care | Brian ... http://brianharrisauthor.com/mirroring-god-implications-of-the-imago-de...

Home
About Brian Harris
Bookings & Calendar
Books
Blog
Budding Theologians

Home Budding Theologians Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care

Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for

Pastoral Care
Posted by Brian Harris on Nov 29, 2015 in Budding Theologians | 3 comments

I recently finished teaching an introduction to Pastoral Care course at Vose Seminary. It was a great class, and
many thoughtful projects and case studies emerged. One that especially struck me was this essay by Alycia
Randell on the implications of our being made in the image of God, for the provision of pastoral care. Alycia is
drawing towards the end of a combined BMin/BTh degree at Vose, and together with her husband Peter is
engaged in pastoral ministry in Mandurah. I thought that this fine essay more than justified Alycia being
classified as one of our budding theologians, and am glad that she agreed to have her work showcased in this
way. I hope you enjoy her essay as well.

As always, feel free to provide feedback via the comments.

Mirroring God: Implications of the imago Dei for Pastoral Care, by Alycia Randell

Abstract

Over centuries theologians have grappled with the concept of imago Dei which, despite its infrequency
through scripture, carries great weight for our theological understanding of humanitys relationship to God.
Despite the lack of agreement concerning the precise content and meaning, there are several areas where
general consensus can be found. The image of God in humanity can be seenas something that is:
Imperishable, Universal and Relational. It is from these common platforms that I will explore the implications
of the imago Dei for pastoral care

Finding Consensus on Imago Dei

Many pages over time have been devoted to the examination of the image of God in humanity. Over centuries
theologians have grappled with this idea in Genesis that, despite its infrequency through scripture, carries such
weight. A plethora of interpretations have ensued which seek to elucidate in what ways humanity is like God.
Unfortunately, as Vorster surmises, There is little agreement amongst theologians on the precise content and
meaning of the imago Dei.[1] Indeed, Brand portrays something of the scope in the following comment,

Philosophers and theologians have long speculated on all that could be contained within the mystery of that
single phrase. Predictably, they tend to project onto their definitions the principle concerns of their own era.
The Enlightenment age assures us the image of God is the ability to reason, the Pietists identify it as the
spiritual faculty, the Victorians claim it as the capacity to make moral judgements, and the Renaissance
thinkers locate the image of God in artistic creativity. As for our own psychology-dominated age? What else
[2]
could that image be, we are now advised, than our capacity for relationships with other people and with God.

Brands comment however is too simplistic as it does not take into consideration those questions and
conversations that permeate in all eras, such as: how the fall and sin shapes our understanding of the imago
Dei. The importance of these conversations being whether humanity still bears the image of God and if it does,

1 de 7 15/2/2017 11:53 a. m.
Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care | Brian ... http://brianharrisauthor.com/mirroring-god-implications-of-the-imago-de...

to what extent? What damage has been done to the imago Dei as a consequence of sin? Some, like Luther,
suggest that sin destroys the human image-bearing capabilities altogether. Others, like Calvin, separate the
image into parts by distinguishing between humankinds natural and super-natural gifts.[3] The conclusions we
reach regarding the image-bearers we ought to be and the image-bearers we are will have an impact on how
we care. Needless to say, consideration of the consequences of the fall has had an impact in shaping the many
strands of thinking about the imago Dei.

Likewise, is the imago Dei a physical concept, a relational concept that indicates the nature of the human
beings relationship with God, or does it indicate the way in which human beings represent God on earth?
Some, like Brunner, proposes that the imago Dei is an intrinsic quality; a reflection that both indicates the
presence of God and points back towards God.[4] Others, like Barth, reject Brunners ideas that human image
bearing can lie in any inherent qualities. Instead he asserts that the imago Dei cannot be distinguished outside
of relationship with God.[5] The main question here is: what is Gods original purpose for creating humankind
in His image? Ironically, the answer is the same; it is the evidence of God. Whether it is for the purpose of
bringing others into relationship with God, or the proof of relationship with God, both agree that the imago Dei
is the evidence of God.

In fact, there are several areas where general consensus can be found concerning what it means to be a
human made in the likeness of God. It is these commonalities I wish to now turn attention to, and the general
implications each has on pastoral care practices.

The Imago Dei is

Imperishable

One thing that is largely agreed upon within mainstream Christian theology is that sin does not abolish the
humans image, but rather twists and distorts it.[6] The reason being that, The protological history in Genesis
1-11 clearly upholds the humans possession of the imago Dei even after the fall.[7] This can be seen in Gen
9:6 where distinction is drawn between humankind and other forms of life; that is, human life is given greater
value because of the imago Dei. As Boer states, humanity still participates in the imago Dei, however, under
the condition of sin. The bright flame of its original image is now only an ember, but an ember still
glowing.[8] To this Vorster adds, The fact that human image-bearing cannot be destroyed by sin does not
mean that sin only affects the human partially. It rather means that God still preserves the human in spite of
sin.[9] What Vorster captures is the notion that God has placed within humanity an imperishable image.

To put it another way; that which God has done cannot be undone, even by sin. The imago Dei is immortal and
attests to the truth that humankind was made for eternity. The implications for pastoral care are twofold; that
is, the imperishable image is a source of hope and reverence to pastors. It is a source of hope because it
means that no person is a lost cause. As Way points out, [Care] is inclusive of the terrorist, the murderer, the
abuser, the perpetrator of horrendous violence.[10] All humankind retains value in Gods sight, despite sin.
Therefore, we have the hope and assurance that no person is beyond the saving and redemptive work of
Christ.

Secondly it is a source of reverence, as the pastor is without excuse for mistreating, overlooking or judging
another individual. God has deemed all human life to be valuable because he identifies himself within
humanity.[11] Here, the regard shown towards our neighbour is tantamount to the regard we give to the Lord.
Indeed, the value placed on any given individual will alter the behaviour towards them. The ministers work is
to treat every person with the highest esteem.

Yet this is an impossible feat in our own strength. Smail is correct when he asserts,

There is something and somebody beyond ourselves and the culture that has shaped us, to whom we are
bound and answerable, because our calling is not to be ourselves by and for ourselves, but to find ourselves
[12]
beyond ourselves in becoming like him.

It is in Jesus Christ that the pastor is both cared for and receives the ability to care. For Christ does not just
display God-reflecting humanity, but he imparts it to us.[13] In the same way, the pastoral care relationship
imitates the grace we have received in Christ and foreshadows the grace we are yet to receive. For all of us,
the reward is the same: a chance to be judged not for what we are but for what Christ is. When God looks upon
us He sees his beloved Son. [14]

Universal

2 de 7 15/2/2017 11:53 a. m.
Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care | Brian ... http://brianharrisauthor.com/mirroring-god-implications-of-the-imago-de...

Another thing that is largely agreed upon within mainstream Christian theology is that the image of God is seen
in collective humankind. As Boer articulates, I see mankind to constitute the one image of God. In this one
mighty and varied humanity, all women and men participate.[15] He goes on to argue, as some others do,
that Gen 1:27 attests to male and female being made collectively in Gods image and that the imago Dei
therefore is not borne by the individual.

However it could also equally be argued, that an idea embedded in the Genesis text is that the image or
likeness of God is not restrained to one type, kind, gender or person. Rather the image of God is shared. Here I
am more inclined to agree with Wenham,

Whereas Egyptian writers often spoke of kings as being in Gods image, they never referred to other people in
this way. It appears that the OT has democratised this old idea. It affirms that not just the king, but every man
and woman bears Gods image and is his representative on earth.[16]

Still, no individual can claim to bear the image of God in totality. Rather, We are called to bear that image as a
Body because any one of us taken individually would present an incomplete image.[17] Gerkin is correct in
asserting the need for the rediscovery of the congregation as the primary agent of care for the people of
God.[18] He calls for renewed attention to be given to the structures of care given by the congregation and
the advocacy of communal responsibility for one another as the main provider of care.

Relational

A third commonality is the notion that the concept of image ties God and human beings to one another. It
also, on the other hand, delineates between both. God makes a demarcation between other creatures and
humanity since only humanity is made in His likeness. This quality separates humankind from all other
creation. God breathing into man is a single act of special creation.[19] We possess what no other animal
does; we are linked in our essence to God.[20] Yet at the same time, humanity is still part of Gods creation,
and the semblance does not mean equality with God.

Like the rest of the creation we owe our being entirely to the will and purpose of God, but our distinctiveness
from the rest of creation is that God has mirrored himself in us, made us to be like himself so that he can relate
[21]
to us and we to him in a way that is unique.

Humankind is intrinsically relational. Alongside the encouragement of believers to find creative ways of
relating to God, there also is a need for care structures within the gathered church that give space and
opportunity to foster connection. Meditation, communion, prayer, singing, foot washing, responsive readings,
practicing hospitality etc are just as important practices to consider as visitations. As Way points out,

For an intrinsically relational being, even ordinary kindnesses affirm ones identity. The removal of this
category of relationships from pastoral care has minimized our awareness of how important ordinary
[22]
graciousness, everyday recognitions, and little kindnesses are for hospitable culture.

Created for Christ

I wish to return for a moment to the question of why God chose to make humankind in His image and why
image-bearing is linked to the mandate to rule. The creation of humanity is unique in format to every other
creation. Divine deliberation takes place before the creative act and a consensus reached within Trinity to
create humankind in our image. Boer points out, There appears to be an intimate relation between the image
in which Man was created and the work he was given to do.[23] Smail suggests This dominion over the
creation is the consequence of the imaging of the Creator; we have authority over the creation in virtue of our
likeness to the Creator.[24]

Still creating humankind in the image and likeness of God and giving them dominion over the earth appears
above all to be for and in anticipation of Christ Jesus. From a Christological perspective, it could be argued that
within Genesis God sets up the natural laws by which His salvific work will be accomplished. Firstly, that Man
will be the chief bearer of His likeness and the means by which God will be glorified and known. Jesus Christ is
the realisation and fulfilment of Gods original purpose. In Him the destination of the humans image-bearing
becomes evident. Christ is the very likeness and image of God and because of this, He holds dominion over
the earth.

Christ is more than a reflection of God. He is the Manifestation of God that emits the glory of God. Gods being
and character is reflected in a perfect manner in the life of Christ In Genesis 1 the human receives the

3 de 7 15/2/2017 11:53 a. m.
Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care | Brian ... http://brianharrisauthor.com/mirroring-god-implications-of-the-imago-de...

mandate to rule over the creaturely, but Christ, who is the true image of God, receives the mandate to rule
[25]
over the entire cosmos.

As a result of the incarnation and the revelation of the Spirit, we can now know what God is like and in so
doing, what ways we are like God. The work of the carer is hence to help summon up in the people we meet,
the image of God and spark Godliness in the human spirit. Furthermore, it is to encourage perseverance that,
the restoration of the image is an eschatological gift that starts in the present, but that is only fulfilled in the
future.[26] Finally, it is to give constant reflection and educated interpretation to the open meaning assigned
to the nature of the imago Dei in Genesis through the study of Christ Jesus.[27]

Final thoughts

Unfortunately it is often those in positions of ministry who can find themselves most at risk of not knowing for
certain just who they are and what exactly they are to do. As Dystra shares,

Over time, the sheer accumulation of these kinds of encounters began to take their toll on my faith and
ministry. In the face of steady exposure to tragedy and death, I began not only to doubt whether I had
anything of substance to offer the victims and their families, but also to question Gods loving and faithful
nature that I had previously taken for granted Confronting others severe crises on a weekly basis, I found
[28]
myself in a crisis of sorts as well.

In such situations, pastoral care also encompasses self-care. Ministers must be cautious to avoid the snare of
neglecting personal communion with God. In order to offer care those who minister must live in a state of
constant orientation and re-orientation towards God. Ultimately, a mirror can only reflect that which its face is
turned towards.

Bibliography

Boer, Harry R. An Ember Still Glowing: Humankind as the Image of God (Michigan: William B. Eerdmans, 1990)

Brand, Dr. Paul & Philip Yancey. Fearfully & Wonderfully Made (Michigan: Zondervan, 1980)

Brand, Dr. Paul & Phillip Yancey. In His Image: The Sequel to Fearfully & Wonderfully Made (Michigan:
Zondervan, 1984).

Cobb, John B. Jr. Theology and Pastoral Care (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977)

Dyrstra, Robert C. Images of Pastoral Care (Missouri: Chalice press, 2005)

Gerkin, Charles V. An Introduction to Pastoral Care (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1997)

Smail, Tom. Like Father Like Son: The Trinity Imaged in our Humanity (Bletchley: Paternoster, 2005)

Vorster, Nico. Created in the Image of God: Understanding Gods Relationship with Humanity (Oregon:
Pickwick Publications, 2011)

Way, Peggy. Created by God: Pastoral Care for all Gods People (Missouri: Chalice press, 2005)

[1] Nico Vorster, Created in the Image of God: Understanding Gods Relationship with Humanity (Oregon:
Pickwick Publications, 2011) 3.

[2] Dr. Paul Brand & Phillip Yancey , In His Image: The Sequel to Fearfully & Wonderfully Made (Michigan:
Zondervan, 1984) 20.

[3] Calvin suggests that the natural gifts are distorted by sin while the supernatural are taken away completely.
The natural gifts are ruined but not destroyed, whereas the supernatural (love, faith, holiness) can only be
regained through regeneration. Vorster, Created in the Image of God, 13.

[4] The relationship, says Brunner, is characterised by the fact that God reveals himself to the human in the
Word and that He at the same time gives the human rationality to receive his Word. And that, The human
was not only created by God, but was created in and for God. Ibid, 6.

[5] The human is a being that lives in a state of interaction. Ibid, 7.

4 de 7 15/2/2017 11:53 a. m.
Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care | Brian ... http://brianharrisauthor.com/mirroring-god-implications-of-the-imago-de...

[6] Ibid, 13.

[7] Ibid, 15.

[8] Harry R. Boer, An Ember Still Glowing: Humankind as the Image of God (Michigan: William B. Eerdmans,
1990) ix.

[9] Italics mine. Vorster, Created in the Image of God, 16

[10] Peggy Way, Created by God: Pastoral Care for all Gods People (Missouri: Chalice press, 2005) 61.

[11] Boer agrees with this sentiment when he comments, Between the true image and the Prototype there is a
fellowship, a mutuality, in which each recognises himself in the other. Boer, An Ember Still Glowing, 5.

[12] Tom Smail, Like Father Like Son: The Trinity Imaged in our Humanity (Bletchley: Paternoster, 2005) 4.
Brand and Yancey echo the sentiment in the following statement concerning Human self-image Paradoxically,
any of those desirable qualities may raise a barrier against the image of God, for virtually any quality that a
person can rely on makes it more difficult for that person to rely on the spirit of God. Brand & Yancey, In His
Image, 41-42.

[13] Brand & Yancey, In His Image, 59.

[14] Ibid, 47.

[15] Boer, An Ember Still Glowing, ix.

[16] Wenham, Genesis 1-15, cited in Smail, Like Father, Like Son, 46.

[17] Brand & Yancey, In His Image, 40

[18] [Italics mine] Charles V. Gerkin, An Introduction to Pastoral Care (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1997) 92.
Gerkin points out that the meaning of the term pastoral has historically had a fundamentally communal
connotation. Ibid, 92.

[19] Brand & Yancey, In His Image, 22.

[20] Ibid, 21.

[21] Smail, Like Father Like Son, 47.

[22] Way, Created by God, 79.

[23] Boer, An Ember Still Glowing, 3.

[24] Smail, Like Father Like Son, 43.

[25] Vorster, Created in the Image of God, 17.

[26] Ibid, 19.

[27] Ibid, ix. As Way says, The concern is rather a deeper issue of how congregations are to connect their
liturgies with their practices, their mission statements with their actions, their scriptural knowledge with their
ordinary and everyday behaviours, and their intentions with their embodiments. Way, Created by God, xii.

[28] Robert C. Dyrstra, Images of Pastoral Care (Missouri: Chalice press, 2005)73.

Share this:

3 Comments

5 de 7 15/2/2017 11:53 a. m.
Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care | Brian ... http://brianharrisauthor.com/mirroring-god-implications-of-the-imago-de...

1.
Syd Middleton December 7, 2015

What an insight! we are truly blessed to have Alycia serving with us at Waratah. A real Angel.
Syd Middleton. Waratah Christian Community Elder.

Reply

2.
Chris Brown February 24, 2016

This would be a lovely article for people in formation for spiritual direction to look at. When engaged in
the interface between pilgrims and God it makes a lot of sense to also be exposed to this type of fine
theological reflection. Many thanks. (Chris Brown, author of Guiding Gideon: Awakening to Life and
Faith).

Reply

Brian Harris February 24, 2016

Thanks Chris. I will pass on your comments to Alycia. I am sure she will find them encouraging.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

Managing Monday with Viktor E. Frankl Take 2

Managing Monday with Viktor E. Frankl
About a holiday

6 de 7 15/2/2017 11:53 a. m.
Mirroring God: Implications of the Imago Dei for Pastoral Care | Brian ... http://brianharrisauthor.com/mirroring-god-implications-of-the-imago-de...

Managing Monday with Pope Francis (take 2)

Managing Monday with Pope Francis

Recent Comments

Brian Harris on Managing Monday with Viktor E. Frankl

Becky Bee on Managing Monday with Viktor E. Frankl
Elizabeth jenner on About a holiday
Charmaine Hugo on About a holiday
Lynn on About a holiday

Tags

Apologetics Augustine Augustine quotes Barth Barth quotes Bible Blog Brian Harris books Calling Calvin
Christian education Christian life Christian Living Christmas church churchless faith CS
Lewis cumulative case apologetics disability doubt Easter emotionally healthy spirituality Emotions Ethics faith family Henri Nouwen
inspirational quotes John Calvin leadership Managing Monday Mandela
mission Nelson Mandela New Year Pastoral care preaching
Marriage Quotes resurrection sermon theology Vocation
When Faith Turns Ugly wisdom

Brian Harris is an Author, Principal of Vose Seminary, and Pastor at Large of Carey Baptist Church and Carey
Baptist College in Perth, Western Australia
Brian Harris

Subsc ribe to RSS Feeds

RSS - Posts
RSS - Comments

Rec ent Posts

Managing Monday with Viktor E. Frankl Take 2

Managing Monday with Viktor E. Frankl
About a holiday
Managing Monday with Pope Francis (take 2)
Managing Monday with Pope Francis

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress

7 de 7 15/2/2017 11:53 a. m.