Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Note: The losses anticipated for future periods are not recognized until they occur.
3. Extraordinary items
A prohibition of a product line by the government would be deemed an extraordinary event in a business
under U.S. GAAP as it is certainly unusual in nature and happens infrequently. Note that IFRS prohibits the
recognition of gains and losses as extraordinary.
6. Discontinued operations
The results of operations of a component of an entity will be reported in the discontinued operations section
of the income statement if the component is deemed to have met all criteria for the "held for sale"
classification.
Income/loss from an operating segment of a company that is held for sale or sold during the current period must
be reported, net of tax, in the period incurred. An operating segment is considered to be a component of an entity.
At December 31, Year 1, the segment has not been sold, but will still be accounted for as a discontinued
operation because it meets the held for sale requirement.
Impairment Loss
The impairment loss for Year 1 is $500,000 and represents the difference between the book value and fair value of
the segment at December 31, Year 1. Even though the division sold for a higher price in Year 2, the $2,500,000
represents the best available information as of December 31, Year 1.
There is no impairment loss at December 31, Year 2 because the segment was sold in Year 2.
Operating Loss
Operating losses are recognized in full in the period incurred. In Year 1, the operating loss for the entire year is
included in discontinued operations, even though the decision to dispose was not made until July 1.
There is no gain or loss on disposal in Year 1 because the segment was not sold until Year 2.
The gain on disposal in Year 2 is $380,000 ($3,200,000 sales price - $320,000 brokers fee - $2,500,000 book
value of segment).
In Year 1, the company records income tax benefit of $360,000 ($1,200,000 net loss from discontinued operations
x 30%). In Year 2, the company records income tax expense of $54,000 ($180,000 net gain from discontinued
operations x 30%).
1. Change in Accounting Principle, Prospective
A change from FIFO to LIFO is a change in accounting principle that is accounted for prospectively, like a change
in accounting estimate because it is too difficult to calculate the cumulative effect of the change.
The income tax basis of accounting is a non-GAAP method. A change from a non-GAAP method of accounting
to a GAAP method of accounting is considered to be an error correction under GAAP. An error correction is
accounted for by restating all prior periods presented and adjusting the beginning retained earnings of the earliest
period presented.
A change in accounting entity occurs when an entity has changed composition as a result of consolidation or a
business combination. When Goose presents it consolidated financial statements that include Gosling, it will
restate any prior period financial statements presented for comparative purposes to also reflect the consolidation
of Gosling. Under U.S. GAAP, this restatement is referred to as a retrospective adjustment.
While the change in reporting construction contracts is a change in accounting principle, an accounting principle
may be changed only if required by GAAP or if the alternative is preferable and more fairly presents the
information. A change in accounting principle is not acceptable if it done in order increase earnings and the stock
price of the company.
Since the company booked a liability in the previous year based on the best information available at the time, the
subsequent settlement is accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate. Previous financial
statements are not restated.
Axl, Bruce, Diddy, and Elvis are reportable segments because they each have 10% of at least one of the
following criteria:
An operating segment meets the size test if its reported revenue, including both sales to outsiders and
intersegment sales is 10% or more of the combined revenue, internal and external, of all reporting segments.
Combined revenue is $165,000 ($105,000 external + $60,000 intersegment). Diddy and Elvis have revenues in
excess of $16,500 ($165,000 x 10%).
An operating segment meets the size test if the absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10% or more of
the greater, in absolute amount, of
1. The combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss
2. The combined reported loss of all reporting segments that did report a loss.
The combined profit of all reporting segments that did not report a loss is $58,000 ($0 + $5,000 + $3,000 +
$50,000). The combined loss of all reporting segments that reported a loss is $9,000. $58,000 is greater than
$9,000, so a segment is deemed reportable if the absolute amount of its profit or loss exceeds $5,800 ($58,000 x
10%). Axl, with a loss of $9,000, and Elvis, with income of $50,000, meet this criteria.
A segment meets the size test if its assets are 10% or more of the combined assets of all reporting segments.
Combined assets are $87,000. Bruce and Elvis have assets in excess of $8,700 ($87,000 x 10%).
The total external revenue of operating segments, as determined above, must constitute 75% of total external
revenue. Total external revenue is $105,000. Reportable segments have external revenue of $90,000 (10,000 +
10,000 + 70,000), which is 86% of the total external sales.
1. Correct
No adjustment is necessary. Under both IFRS and U.S. GAAP, available for sale marketable securities are
marked-to-market at period end with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in the other comprehensive income
account. In the scenario above, the reclassified marketable securities would have generated an unrealized gain of
$750,000 in OCI.
3. Correct
No adjustment is necessary. Under IFRS, the company can choose to use the cost or revaluation model. RC
selected the revaluation model and properly reported the $895,000 excess of fair value over carrying value as a
revaluation surplus in other comprehensive income.
6. Correct
No adjustment is necessary. RC completed an effective foreign currency hedge in the third quarter of the fiscal
year properly reflecting the $65,000 translation gain in other comprehensive income. Because the foreign
currency transaction was liquidated in the following quarter, it is proper to remove the prior translation gain
reported in other comprehensive income in the fourth quarter when the investment was terminated.
Source of answer for this question:
QUESTION 1
This question deals with the incorrect recording of a sale. The company incorrectly accounted for the
transaction on the cash basis, overstating sales and income in Year 3, the year of receipt, and understating
sales and income in Year 2, the year of the proper accrual. As the receivable was collected prior to the Year 3
balance sheet date, there is no impact on the balance sheet.
To correct the error, sales are increased (credited) in Year 2 when the sales should have been recorded and
decreased (debited) in Year 3 when the sales were actually (incorrectly) recorded.
C O R R EC T I O N (2,000) 2,000 -- --
QUESTION 2
This question deals with the incorrect capitalizing of freight-out (covered in lecture F4). The company
inappropriately accounted for freight-out as an inventory item. Freight-out is a selling expense that should be
accounted for as a period cost at the time incurred. [Note that freight-in is a proper inventory cost.] The
company uses the FIFO method of inventory and maintains a safety stock equal to 50% of the current year
purchases. What this means is that only half of the current year purchases is sold each year; the other half of
the purchases carries over to the next year and is sold first (and shipped) in that year. For example, freight-out
for Year 1 was $50,000. The full $50,000 should have been expensed in Year 1, but it was not; only $25,000
was expensed (from the goods that were actually sold).
Although the company overstates its inventory, it does expense (and thereby reduce) net income for the cost of
goods sold that is recognized. The adjustment to each year's net income is the difference between the
accounting that should have occurred (expensing the entire amount) and the amount that had already been
recorded as cost of goods sold expense.
Original Accounting
Cost of goods sold, current 25,000 75,000 150,000
year
Cost of goods sold, prior year 25,000 75,000
C O R R EC T I O N 25,000 50,000 75,000 -- 150,000
Correct Accounting
Expense freight-out (period 50,000 150,000 300,000 -- 150,000
expense)
The correction is to add $25,000 of expense to Year 1. [Note that the "freight-out capitalized" line is just
information and is not part of the "footing" of the column.] The total correction is the additional $25,000.
The "Original Accounting" plus the "Correction" equals the "Correct Accounting" for Year 1.
In Year 2, $150,000 should have been expensed, but only $75,000 of the $150,000 was. In addition, the
$25,000 from Year 1 was expensed in Year 2 when it should have been expensed in Year 1. That means
that $100,000 was expensed when $150,000 should have been. The correction is to add $50,000 of
expense to Year 2.
In Year 3, $300,000 should have been expensed, but only $150,000 of the $300,000 was. In addition, the
$75,000 from Year 2 was expensed in Year 3 when it should have been expensed in Year 2. That means
that $225,000 was expensed when $300,000 should have been. The correction is to add $75,000 of
expense to Year 3.
At December 31, Year 3, there was $150,000 still in inventory that should have been expensed and not
capitalized. Inventory is adjusted by that amount (as a credit).
QUESTION 3
This question deals with discontinued operations (covered in F1). Losses associated with discontinued
operations should be accounted for in the years in which they occur. Components that are held for sale or that
have already been sold (or otherwise disposed of) would be charged with an impairment loss that would be
recognized once the conditions for disposal or held for sale status are met. Operating losses related to the
component are recognized in the year in which they occur. Estimated losses related to subsequent periods are
not accrued. All that has to be done here is to move the $150,000 of Year 3 operating loss from Year 2 to Year
3. The correction is the difference between the amount recognized and what should have been recognized.
Because the asset was disposed of before 12/31/Year 3, there is no effect on the balance sheet.
C O R R EC T I O N (150,000) 150,000 -- --
Correct Accounting
Impairment loss 100,000
Year 2 operating loss 75,000
Year 3 operating loss 150,000 -- --
QUESTION 4
This question deals with a change in accounting principle inseparable from a change in accounting estimate
(covered in F1). A change in accounting principle inseparable from a change in accounting estimate should be
accounted for as a change in accounting estimate. The change should be handled prospectively in income.
The company changed to the cost recovery method of recognizing revenue, which means that it will only
recognize profit after all the costs have been recovered. Recall that with a profit margin of 50%, this means that
there is $300,000 in profit and $300,000 in costs. The company expects to collect $200,000 per year beginning
in Year 1. Therefore, with the cost recovery method, the company would recognize $0 profit in Year 1 (i.e., the
entire collection of $200,000 would go against the cost recovery), $100,000 profit in Year 2 ($100,000 of the
$200,000 collected would go against the cost recovery), and $200,000 profit in Year 3 (as the costs were
recovered 100% in Year 2, all of the collections in Year 3 would be revenue).
Note that the facts tell us that the company did not account for the change in accounting principle that was
inseparable from a change in estimate; therefore, the original accounting as installment sales still exists on the
books of the company.
Let's look at the details of the transaction. The original sale was $600,000, with $200,000 scheduled to be
collected each year. With a 50% profit margin and the installment method, $100,000 of profit would have been
recognized each year. This was part of the original accounting. Note that the receivable was collected before
12/31/Year 3, so there is no impact on the balance sheet.
C O R R EC T I O N 100,000 (100,000) -- --
Correct Accounting
Account for prospectively:
Year 1 profit recognition --
Year 2 profit recognition (100,000)
Year 3 profit recognition (200,000) -- --
QUESTION 5
This question deals with amortization of software costs (covered in F2). The question states two things: (1) the
useful life of the software is 4 years and (2) the amount of sales is realized at 10% of expected lifetime sales
each year. The question appears to contradict itself because if the software has a useful life of 4 years, then it
is expected that 25% of the sales would occur in each year. The question goes on to say, however, that 10%
of expected lifetime sales is expected to be realized each year, which would seem to indicate the company
believes the sales to exist over 10 years. For these purposes, we are going to assume that the company's
accounting estimates are correct (for whatever reason).
Software costs are capitalized once technological feasibility is established and are then amortized using the
greater of the straight-line amortization over the useful life of the software or the percentage of estimated sales
achieved. The useful life of four years requires amortization of one-quarter (or 25%) of the cost, while sales are
realized at only 10% of total projected sales. The company's method of amortization understated the
amortization by $30,000 per year and overstated the capitalized software by $90,000.
Correct Accounting
Account for software development costs and amortize on a straight-line b asis or percentage of sales,
whichever is greater.
Amortization of cost 50,000 50,000 50,000
Remaining book value (200,000 50,000
- 150,000)
The $30,000 Debit in Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 adjusts the amortization to the correct amounts, and the
$90,000 Credit for the Year 3 balance sheet adjusts the $140,000 that was originally recorded to its correct
$50,000 amount.
QUESTION 6
This question deals with revenue recognition (covered in F2). To properly match earnings with the period
benefited, revenues should be recognized when earned, not when received. Subscription revenues that
represent an advance payment over a three-year period should be recognized to the extent that obligations have
been fulfilled in the year of receipt, with the remainder recorded as deferred revenue. The company's accounting
overstated revenue in the year of receipt, and did not properly establish a liability.
C O R R EC T I O N 100,000 100,000
Correct Accounting
Recognition of revenue when
earned
Subscription revenue
Deferred revenue (150,000 - (50,000) 100,000
$50,000)
QUESTION 7
This question deals with inventory (covered in F4). In this question, inventory sitting in a warehouse was
improperly included in cost of goods sold even though the goods had not been sold. Risks of ownership pass to
the buyer upon receipt when goods are shipped FOB destination. Risks of ownership pass to the buyer upon
delivery to a common carrier under FOB shipping point. In this case, since the goods were shipped FOB
destination, title had not passed to the buyer and the goods should properly have been included in inventory.
Restoration of inventory accounts and elimination of cost of goods sold are required adjustments.
C O R R EC T I O N (50,000) 50,000
Correct Accounting
Account for costs of inventory for
which company still has title
Cost of goods sold --
Inventory 50,000
SUMMARY
A recap of the correction adjustments is as follows:
Note that each numbered line, including the total adjustments line, shows a net total of debits and credits equal
to zero. All that is being done in each year is that the numbers are moved around.
JE#1
Sales $20,000
To adjust to accrual basis sales revenue, the sales that were made in Year 1 but not yet collected at the end of
the year are added to the sales already booked for the year under the cash basis. The amount uncollected at
year-end is accounts receivable.
JE#2
Inventory $12,000
Purchases made on the cash basis of accounting are not recorded until the invoice is paid. Since $12,000 of the
goods are still on hand, the amount is recorded under the accrual basis with inventory as a debit and accounts
payable as a credit.
The $2,000 of goods sold but not yet paid for is recorded under the accrual basis with a debit to cost of sales and
a credit to accounts payable.
JE#3
The asset purchase of $5,000 was recorded as small tools expense under the cash basis. Under the accrual
basis, the tools need to be reported as fixed assets with a debit to the factory equipment account. Depreciation
is calculated on a straight line basis for one year and totals $1,000.
JE #4
The insurance policy included as an administrative expense is for one year, from July 1, Year 1 to June 30, Year
2. Since six months are still to run on the policy, prepaid insurance of $1,200 ($2,400 x 6/12) should be reported
under the accrual basis.
JE #5
Cash $500
Under the accrual basis, the bad check would be reported as accounts receivable since it was not paid as of
December 31, Year 1.
JE #6
The bad debt expense account is calculated based on 1.5% of sales for the year. Sales revenue for the year is
$60,000, after including the sales in JE #1. Bad debt expense is $900 ($60,000 x 1.5%).
JE #7
Payroll expense $1,300
Since the company pays its employees seven days after the end of the pay period and the last pay date recorded
by the company was December 31st (for time worked through December 24th), under the accrual basis the
company has to record accrued payroll for the additional one week that was worked in Year 1 and will be paid on
January 7th, Year 2.
JE #8
On the accrual basis, the company will record the tax liability based on the income shown in the Year 1 accrual
basis income statement. The taxable income is calculated as follows:
The estimated income tax payments offset the total income tax expense and the remaining $1,000 is unpaid at
year-end and shown as income tax payable.
Under installment accounting, profit is recognized when cash is collected.
No gross profit is recognized in Year 1 because the Year 1 cost of sales of $60,000 is not recovered during Year
1.
All gross profit is deferred at the end of Year 1 because the $60,000 cost of sales has not been recovered.
From the Year 1 sales, $60,000 was collected in Year 2, for cumulative cash collections of $100,000 ($40,000 in
Year 1 + $60,000 in Year 2).
Year 2 recognized gross profit on Year 1 sales = $100,000 cash collections - $60,000 cost of sales = $40,000
Year 2 costs of $80,000 are fully recovered since the company collected $130,000 of the Year 2 installment
sales.
Year 2 recognized gross profit on Year 2 sales = $130,000 cash collections - $80,000 cost of sales = $50,000
Deferred gross profit on Year 1 sales at the end of Year 2 = $60,000 - $40,000 = $20,000
Deferred gross profit on Year 2 sales at the end of Year 2 = $120,000 - $50,000 = $70,000
2. $4,769,231
Carrying Value End Y2 $26,000,000
Less: Impairment Charge (3,000,000)
Adjusted Carrying Value $23,000,000
Amortization Periods 13
Amortization Expense $1,769,231
Impairment Charge 3,000,000
Total Expense in Y3 $4,769,231
3. $1,400,000
Initial Carrying Value $30,000,000
Less: Y1 Amortization (2,000,000)
Carrying Value End Y1 $28,000,000
Less: Fair Value End Y1 (26,600,000)
Revaluation Loss Y1 $1,400,000
* The year 2 income statement recognizes a reversal of the $1,400,000 revaluation loss reported in year 1, with
the $200,000 remainder recognized on the balance sheet as a revaluation surplus in the other comprehensive
income account.
Part 1:
1. $98,500. Money market instruments are considered cash equivalents, as they are easily converted into
cash and represent short-term instruments that are very low risk in terms of potential loss of principal.
Cash and money market instruments should be included in this total.
2. $39,000. The current value of the TBR stock (3,000 shares at $13 per share) should be included. The
original purchase price is relevant in terms of calculating the unrealized gain or loss (which will be reflected
on the Statement of Changes in Net Worth), but will not be presented on the Statement of Financial
Condition. In addition, HYL stock will not be included here because the stock was sold and no longer
represents an asset in Tames portfolio.
3. $9,150. Bond investments are monetary assets and should be valued based on the present value of
projected cash receipts. Each bond is currently worth $915 and he has purchased 10 bonds. So the total
value should be $9,150 (bonds payable of $10,000 less $850 bond discount.
4. $225,000. The original purchase price and original mortgage are not relevant for the current years
Statement of Financial Condition. The current value of $225,000 is what will be listed as an asset. The
current value of the mortgage of $190,000 will be listed as a liability.
5. $50,000. The current value of $50,000 is all that is relevant for the Assets section of this statement. The
outstanding principal owed of $35,000 will be listed as a liability.
6. $35,000. Life insurance should be listed at its cash surrender value of $40,000 less the $5,000 loan that is
outstanding on the policy. The fair value and face value are not included here.
7. $300,000. When a business interest is deemed to be large, ($300,000 relative to his overall asset
portfolio would be considered large/significant) the interest should be presented on a net basis. The value
of the business is $1.5 million ($4 million in assets - $2.5 million in liabilities). Tames holds a 20% interest
valued at $300,000 ( $1,500,000 X 20%).
8. $275,000. Only the pension plan benefits that are vested should be included as an asset.
Part 2:
1. Current values for stock investments are listed as assets on the Statement of Financial Condition. Original
cost data is used to determine unrealized and realized gains or losses, but it is not listed specifically under
either statement and is not required to be disclosed.
2. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments will appear on the Statement of Changes in Net
Worth.
3. Estimated taxes owed (based on when the stock currently held is actually sold) will appear as a liability on
the Statement of Financial Condition.
4. Realized gains and losses on the sale of property will appear on the Statement of Changes in Net Worth.
5. Interest rate details on an outstanding mortgage will be listed as a Disclosure.
6. Principal outstanding on student loans will be listed as a liability on the Statement of Financial Condition.
7. While a pay down of principal will reflect as a decrease in the liability itself, interest paid on principal owed
will be reflected on the Statement of Changes in Net Worth.
8. Nonvested pension plan benefits may be listed as a Disclosure, but will not be included on either
statement. Vested pension plan benefits will be listed as an asset on the Statement of Financial
Condition.
9. The face amount on a life insurance policy will be included in a Disclosures area. The cash surrender value
(less any loans payable) will be included on the Statement of Financial Condition.
AJE#1
Dr. Prepaid expenses $5,000
Cr. Rent expense $5,000
The rent expense attributable to year 3 that has been paid in year 2 is a prepaid item as of December 31, year 2.
AJE#2
Dr. Depreciation expense $1,500
Cr. Accumulated depreciation - pp&e $1,500
Depreciation is calculated on the original cost of $20,000, less salvage value of $5,000 over a 10 year useful life.
AJE#3
Dr. Bad debt expense $750
Cr. Allowance for doubtful accounts $750
When a specific account is written off, the allowance account is reduced (debit) and the receivable is removed from
Accounts receivable (credit).
AJE#5
Dr. Insurance expense $650
Cr. Prepaid expenses $650
Insurance expense for the year ended December 31, year 2 that has been posted to Prepaid expenses needs to be
adjusted to an expense account.
AJE#6
Dr. Interest receivable $300
Cr. Interest income $300
Interest income that has been earned in Year 2 is shown as income even though it has not as yet been received
(accrual concept).
AJE#7
Dr. Tax expense $2,000
Cr. Taxes payable $2,000
Income tax expense for the year of $3,000 for Year 2 is shown as an expense for the year. Since the amount in the
expense and payable account is $1,000, an additional $2,000 is needed to adjust the amount to the balance at year
end. It would appear that JRM Co. made a tax accrual of $1,000 earlier in the year.
April 1, year 1
The cost of purchasing a patent from an outside source for $50,000 is capitalized as an intangible asset. The
$35,000 in development costs incurred by DD Co. is research and development which is a direct charge to
expense.
July 1, year 1
Research and development costs are a direct charge to income EXCEPT for materials or equipment that have
alternate future uses. Because the equipment qualifies under this rule, the amount capitalized is the original cost
plus any expenditure directly related to the acquisition of the asset.
October 1, year 1
Legal fees for an unsuccessful defense of a trademark are an expense. Legal fees for a successful defense of the
trademark are added to the asset value of the trademark.
A patent is amortized over the shorter of its estimated useful life or its remaining useful life. Amortization is on a
straight line basis: $50,000/10 years x 9/12.
Depreciation expense is calculated on the capitalized amount of $79,000. Depreciation is on the straight line
basis: 79,000/5 year x 6/12. Because the equipment is currently used for research and development, the
depreciation is charged to research and development expense.
No entry required
Goodwill amortization is a two step process. First, since the carrying value of the identifiable net assets exceeds
the fair value, there is a potential for impairment. Second, the amount of goodwill loss is measured by comparing
the implied fair value of the goodwill to the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the implied fair value is less than its
carrying amount, a goodwill loss is recognized. In this case, the implied fair value is higher so no goodwill
impairment is recognized.
Source of the answer for this question:
Note: The solution to this research question states that the guidance for identifying a development stage
enterprise can be found in ASC 915-10-20 Glossary. Because there are no paragraph numbers in 915-10-20
and the word Glossary is not a paragraph reference, the answer to this question should be entered as follows:
FASB ASC 915-10-20
Solution:
1) DR Valuation account, Smith Co. $10,000
CR Unrealized gain on trading securities $10,000
7) DR Cash $255,000
DR Valuation account, Jones Co. 25,000
DR Realized loss on available for sale security 15,000
CR Unrealized loss on available for sale security 25,000
CR Available for sale security, Williams Co. 270,000
1. Cost Method
The investor (Big) accounts for the investment using the cost method if the investor does not have the ability to
exercise significant influence over the investee. Even though Big owns over 20% of Small, the remaining stock is
owned by one individual and control would be retained by the majority shareholder and his family who controls the
Board.
2. Consolidation
Big is the primary beneficiary of the partnership/VIE and must consolidate the partnership/VIE.
3. Equity Method
The equity method is used if the investor can exercise significant influence over the investee and holds 50% or
less of the voting stock. At December 31, Year 1, Big is the largest shareholder of Little Ladies and controls the
Board of Directors. The stock ownership percentage, which is now 28%, is a guideline that would reinforce the
correct answer; however, the control supersedes the ownership percentage.
4. Consolidation
The investor should prepare consolidated financial statements whenever the investor has control (over 50%
ownership) of the subsidiary. Big would consolidate the operations of Shared into their consolidated financial
statements. Even though Big consults with and gets input from the 49% shareholder, there is nothing in the facts
of the question that would imply that Big does not have control.
5. Consolidation
Because Big owns over 50% of the stock of Petite, it has control of Petite and should consolidate Petites
operations into its consolidated financial statements. A different location, different industry, different year end,
and no daily business relationship would not change the control as a result of majority investment.
1. $369,000; $39,000
Under the equity method, the investment is originally recorded at the price paid to acquire the investment.
The investment is subsequently adjusted as the net assets of the investee change through the earning of
income and payment of dividends. The investment account increases by the investor's share of the investee's
net income. Barnes' Year 1 share of Rhodes' income is calculated as follows:
2. $6,600; $9,000
Barnes should record the 10% stock dividend received from Rhodes with a memorandum entry that reduces the
per share cost of the Rhodes stock owned. Barnes will still own 30% of Rhodes after the stock dividend.
The distribution of dividends by Rhodes reduces the investment balance on Barnes' books by $2,400 ($8,000 x
30%).
DR Cash $ 2,400
CR Investment in Rhodes $ 2,400
Neither the earnings or dividends of Barnes affect the investment or income account.
Investment in Rhodes = $9,000 - $2,400 = $6,600 Rhodes (investee) income = $9,000
U.S. GAAP - $220,000; $450,000
Under U.S. GAAP, the full goodwill method is required. Under the full goodwill method, goodwill is the difference
between the fair value of the subsidiary and the fair value of the subsidiary's net assets:
Under the full goodwill method, noncontrolling interest is the fair value of the subsidiary times the noncontrolling
interest percentage:
Under the IFRS partial goodwill method, goodwill is the difference between the acquisition price and the fair
value of the subsidiary net assets acquired.
Under the partial goodwill method, noncontrolling interest is the fair value of the subsidiary's net assets times
the noncontrolling interest percentage:
SITUATION 1
The gain or loss on the intercompany sale of a depreciable asset is unrealized from a consolidated financial
statement perspective until the asset is sold to an outsider. An elimination entry in the period of the sale
eliminates the intercompany gain/loss and adjusts the asset and accumulated depreciation to their original
balance on the date of sale:
DR Gain on sale 40,000
CR Accumulated depreciation 15,000
CR Depreciation expense 5,000
CR Equipment 20,000
Since Peterson sold the equipment to Silver, a 100% subsidiary, the gain of $40,000 is eliminated. It was
originally entered in the books of Peterson as a credit and is calculated as the sales price of the asset of
$120,000, less the net book value of $80,000 ($100,000 cost less accumulated depreciation on 1/1/Y3 of
$20,000).
The accumulated depreciation for the consolidated group at December 31, Yr 3 is based on the original cost of
$100,000. Three years of accumulated straight line depreciation is $30,000.
$0 for Peterson since the accumulated depreciation was removed as part of the journal entry recorded at
the time of the sale.
$15,000 for Silver Corp., based on one year of straight-line depreciation ($120,000/8 years).
The eliminating journal entry raises the accumulated depreciation from $15,000 to the correct amount of $30,000.
The correct amount of depreciation expense for Year 3 is $10,000 based on the original purchase of the asset by
Peterson ($100,000 cost to Peterson / 10 years = $10,000). Silver Corp. recorded depreciation of $15,000 based
on their purchase of the asset at the beginning of Year3 ($120,000 cost to Silver / 8 years = $15,000).
The eliminating journal entry reduces the depreciation from $15,000 to the correct amount of $10,000.
The original cost of the equipment to Peterson is $100,000. The $120,000 cost of the asset to Silver must be
reduced to the original amount paid by Peterson.
SITUATION 2
When affiliated companies sell inventory to one another, the total amount of the intercompany sale and cost of
goods sold is eliminated when preparing consolidated financial statements. In addition, the intercompany profit
must be eliminated from the ending inventory and cost of goods sold of the group.
DR Sales 50,000
CR Inventory 8,000
CR Cost of goods sold 42,000
40% of the goods sold by Peterson are still in the ending inventory of Silver. The original cost of this inventory on
Peterson's books was $12,000 ($30,000 x 40%). The inventory is on Silver's books at the cost to Silver of $20,000
($50,000 x 40%).
The reduction of inventory adjusts the $20,000 inventory on the books of Silver to the correct amount of $12,000,
the original cost to Peterson.
The entire amount of Peterson's cost of goods sold is eliminated. This amount is $30,000.
In addition, Silver's cost of sales is based on the price paid to Peterson for the inventory. The additional cost Silver
paid is $20,000 ($50,000 intercompany sales price - $30,000 cost of goods sold). The amount that was sold
represents 60% of $20,000, so that another $12,000 needs to be eliminated to show the cost of goods sold based
on the original cost to Peterson.
1. Eliminate investment in subsidiary
Journal entry:
Remember to use the CARINBIG mnemonic to ensure that you eliminate all the appropriate accounts:
Common stock Eliminate the par value of the common stock of the subsidiary at the date of the acquisition;
the par value of the common stock is taken directly from the trial balance.
Additional paid-in capital Eliminate the additional paid-in capital of the subsidiary at the date of acquisition;
the additional paid-in capital is taken directly from the trial balance.
Retained earnings Eliminate the retained earnings of the subsidiary at the date of acquisition; amount is
taken directly from the trial balance.
Investment Eliminate the Parent Company's investment in Subsidiary.
Noncontrolling Interest In this instance, it is not applicable as it was a 100% acquisition.
Balance sheet adjusted to fair value Increase or decrease the book value of the subsidiary's plant and
equipment to equal its FV.
Identifiable intangible assets recorded at fair value No identifiable intangibles are identified in this problem.
Goodwill Establish a goodwill account as necessary.
The goodwill suffered a $2,000 impairment according to the situation tab. Goodwill is not amortized.
Eliminate intercompany transactions associated with the income statement. The only income statement
related intercompany transaction is the payment of the dividends by the subsidiary.
Eliminate intercompany transactions on the balance sheet. The only intercompany transaction is the
payable and receivable as identified in the facts.
Source of answer for this question:
FASB ASC 323-30-25-1
Keyword: Unincorporated joint ventures
Solution
Adjustments Amounts
Balance per Bank $9,225
Deposits in transit 8,400
Outstanding checks (11,550)
Incorrect check amount (450)
Outstanding checks - (11,550): Check #21063 is correctly shown as a disbursement by the company in March and should
clear in April. If the check has still not cleared by the end of April, the company may want to consider further investigation.
Incorrect check amount - (450): The check to the farmers market was correctly recorded by the company. The bank
cashed the check for the incorrect amount and will remit the $450 shortfall to the payee in April. This amount reduces the
actual cash balance in the bank reconciliation.
Bad check - (265): The bad check of $265 deposited by the company has not been recorded and should be adjusted on the
books in March.
NSF fee - (30): The NSF fee of $30 has not been recorded and should be adjusted on Gemini s books in March.
Payroll withdrawal: The payroll withdrawal was made by the payroll service in March. The company also properly
recorded the withdrawal in March, so no adjustment is necessary.
Credit card processing fee - (1,240): The credit card processing fee is $1,240 ($62,000x2%). The amount was deducted by
the bank as the deposits were being made. Because it has not yet been recorded on the books of the company, Gemini
needs to reduce the cash balance by $1,240.
Fee rebate - 20: The fee rebate of $20 is an addition to the books of the company on March 31st.
April rent check - 3,500: Since the rent check is still in the possession of Gemini Markets as of March 31st, the company
has incorrectly shown this amount as a reduction of the bank balance. The check amount should be added back to cash.
The rent check is not an outstanding check at March 31st since it was not sent or delivered in March.
Solution and Explanation
A) $1,570,000
The purchase price of the inventory is reduced by the $30,000 discount that the company received. The freight in
on the shipment of $100,000 is added to the cost of the inventory purchased.
B) $750,000
Since the goods were shipped FOB shipping point, title passes to the buyer when the common carrier picks up
the goods to be shipped. The goods are included in Party Supply s inventory until they are in the possession of
the common carrier.
C) ($3,500,000)
The average cost of sales is 70% (one minus the gross margin, ie 30%) of the sales price. Since sales for
December were $5,000,000, the cost of sales would be $3,500,000.
D) $210,000
Since the inventory was in the possession of Party Supply at December 31 and not transferred to the shipper, the
goods are still part of the inventory of the company.
The sale of $300,000 needs to be removed from the accounting records and the $210,000 cost of the sale (70% x
$300,000) is reversed and the goods restored to inventory.
E) ($25,000)
In a consignment arrangement, Party Supply includes the goods in their inventory until such time that the goods
are sold to a third party. When the original shipment was made, there was no change in the company s
inventory. Since 25% of the goods were sold before the end of the year, inventory is reduced by $25,000.
F) $20,000
The amount of goods stored in the public warehouse is already included in the inventory total. Shipping costs
between the warehouses is considered to be an inventory cost. The rent on the warehouse is a period expense
and is not part of inventory.
G) ($46,000)
Inventory is reduced to the lower of cost or market and any probable loss sustained is recorded in the period in
which the loss occurred. The amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the cost of $50,000 and
the realizable value net of selling costs of $4,000.
Solution
Part 1:
The replacement motor for $12,000 and the installation of $4,000 are added as fixed assets since the motor significantly
increases the usefulness of the machine, for a total of $16,000. The maintenance agreement is not considered to be a fixed
asset. The payment at the front end of the agreement would be a prepaid expense, not a fixed asset.
The old drill press is removed from the fixed asset schedule at the asset s original cost of $40,000.
Part 2:
The drill press has a depreciation base of $40,000 and a useful life of 5 years, so the annual depreciation is $8,000
($40,000/5). Since the asset was sold in September, 9 months of depreciation are taken. The amount of depreciation is
$6,000 ($8,000 x 9/12).
The molding machine has a depreciation base of $36,000 and a useful life of 9 years, so the annual depreciation is $4,000
($36,000/9). The amount of depreciation from April through December is $3,000 ($4000 x 9/12).
The replacement motor has a depreciation base of $16,000 and a useful life of 4 years, which is the remaining life of the
tooling machine on which the motor was installed. The annual depreciation is $4,000 ($16,000/4) and the depreciation from
July through December is $2,000 ($4,000 x 6/12).
The Super DP has a depreciation base of $54,000 and a useful life of 4 years, so the annual depreciation is $13,500 and the
depreciation from October through December is $3,375 ($13,500 x 3/12). The change in the estimated useful life of the asset
was determined in Year 2 and should be used to calculate the depreciation for Year 2.
Tax depreciation is not considered when calculating depreciation on the books of the company.
Part 3:
The depreciation expense of $38,375 is the calculated total from the previous schedule.
The old drill press is removed from the accumulated depreciation account at the cumulative amount of depreciation taken
on the asset when it was sold. The accumulated depreciation is $6,000 through Year 1 and an additional $6,000 for Year 2,
for a total of $12,000.
Explanation:
Construction period interest should be capitalized (based on the weighted average of accumulated expenditures)
as part of the cost of producing fixed assets.
Weighted average of accumulated expenditures for year 2: $360,000
The weighted average amount of accumulated expenditures (WAAE) for year 2 is calculated as follows:
$130,000 1/1-3/31/Y2 3 months $ 390,000
$370,000 4/1-9/30/Y2 6 2,220,000
$570,000 10/1-12/31/Y2 3 1,710,000
$4,320,000/12 months
Weighted average of accumulated expenditures $360,000
Note: Although the valuation on the realty tax bill is not used for financial statement purposes, the realty
tax bill is often the best evidence available for obtaining the allocation percentages for land and building.
2. $370,000
In an exchange that lacks commercial substance, record the asset received on the balance sheet as the
net book value (NBV) of the asset surrendered, minus any boot received (or plus any boot paid) in the
transaction, plus any gain recognized (or minus any loss recognized) on the transaction. In this case, a
realized gain of $130,000 exists [$450,000 - $320,000], but it is not reported (recognized) because cash
was paid in an exchange that lacks commercial substance (i.e., the gain is deferred).
Journal entry:
DR New Land $370,000
CR Cash $ 50,000
CR NBV of old land 320,000
3. $315,000
Exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be categorized into one of two groups: those which have
"commercial substance" and those which lack "commercial substance." If the exchange lacks commercial
substance, boot is received and a gain is realized, a portion or all of the gain will be reported (recognized).
In this case, boot received is less than 25% of the total consideration received, so a proportional gain is
recorded, as follows:
$150,000
x 10%
$15,000
Journal entry:
DR Cash $ 50,000
DR New land 315,000
CR NBV of old land $350,000
CR Gain on exchange 15,000
Balance sheet:
NBV of asset surrendered $350,000
Less: Boot received (50,000)
Add: Gain recognized 15,000
$315,000
1. $90,000
Rule: Salvage value is subtracted from cost under the straight-line method to arrive at depreciable base.
2. $162,000
Rule: Double declining balance method is at twice the straight-line rate (in this case twice 12.5% or 25%). However,
DDB does not subtract salvage value to arrive at depreciable base. Thus, cost is the depreciable base.
3. $140,000
Rule: Salvage value is subtracted from cost under the sum-of-the-years'-digits method to arrive at depreciable base.
The denominator for the SYD fraction is 36 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8).
4. $120,000
Rule: Salvage value is subtracted from cost under the units of production method to arrive at depreciable base.
Once the annual depreciation is calculated, simply multiply it by the % of the year the unit was in service
for the given year. In this question you would multiply the $5,125 by 75% for Year 1 and by 100% for Year
2.
Depreciation
Year Doub le SL% NBV Expense Year 1 Year 2
Interest payments = Face amount x Stated rate (semi-annual) = $1,000,000 x (10%/2) = $50,000
Additional
Transaction Journal Bond Bond Bonds Common paid-in Retained
Entries discount premium payable stock capital earnings
1. Cash
Discount
Bonds payable I N I N N N
2. Cash
Bonds payable
Premium N I I N N N
3. Bonds payable
Premium
Common stock
Additional paid-in
capital N D D I I N
4. Cash
Discount
Bonds payable
APIC (stock
warrants) I N I N I N
5. Retained earnings
Common stock
Additional paid-in
N N N I I D
capital
1. Because the nominal interest rate is below market, the bonds will sell at a discount.
2. The amount in excess of face is recorded as a premium. Under U.S. GAAP, no separate entry is made for
the convertibility feature because it is not separable from the bonds.
3. Under the book value method (which is GAAP), the stock issued is valued at the book value of the bonds
being converted. There is no gain or loss recognized.
4. The value of the warrants is credited to Additional paid-in-capital. Because the combination of bonds and
warrants were issued for an amount equal to the face amount of the bonds, the bonds without the warrants
must be valued at a discount.
5. A stock dividend merely reclassifies amounts from Retained earnings to Common stock and APIC at the fair
value on the declaration date.
Answers:
1. Record the journal entry for the issuance of the convertible bonds on January 1,
Year 1. Select no entry if no journal entry is required on this date.
Explanation:
Cash $825,500
Bond issue cost is an asset amortized over the life of the bond. The premium is
also amortized over the life of the bond.
2. Record the journal entries on June 30, Year 1 to recognize interest expense and
the amortization of the bond issue cost for the first six months of Year 1.
Explanation:
Explanation:
4. Assume that the bonds are converted on January 1, Year 2 and Acorn uses the
book value method to account for the conversion of bonds into common stock.
Record the journal entry for the conversion.
Explanation:
5. Assume that the bonds are converted on January 1, Year 2 and Acorn uses the
market value method to account for the conversion of bonds into common stock.
Assume the market price of the common stock on the date of conversion was $
250.00 per share. Record the journal entry for the conversion.
Explanation:
Common stock at par value = 800 bonds x 5 shares/bond x $20.00 par value =
$80,000
Loss $175,277
Source of answer for this question:
If the fair value of the pension plan assets exceeds the PBO, the pension plan is overfunded. If the PBO exceeds
the fair value of the pension plan assets, the pension plan is underfunded.
PART 2:
Pension benefit asset current $0
Pension benefit asset noncurrent $550,000
Pension benefit liability current $25,000
Pension benefit liability noncurrent $650,000
For balance sheet reporting purposes under U.S. GAAP, all overfunded pension plans are aggregated and
reported in total as a noncurrent asset. Because Plan B is SuretoPass' only overfunded pension plan, the
company will report a noncurrent pension benefit asset of $550,000. No current assets are reported under defined
benefit pension plan accounting rules.
Under U.S. GAAP, all underfunded pension plans are also aggregrated and reported as a current liability (to the
extent that the expected benefits payable in the next 12 months exceed the fair value of the plan's assets), a
noncurrent liability or both. SuretoPass has two underfunded pension plans: Plan A and Plan C. The total funded
status of these underfunded pension plans is $675,000 ($225,000 + $450,000). Because Plan C has plan assets
totaling $125,000, but expects to pay benefits of $150,000 in Year 2, SuretoPass must report a current pension
benefit liability of $25,000 ($125,000 $150,000) at 12/31/Year 1. The remaining $650,000 is reported as a
noncurrent liability.
Solution:
1. $941,000
Note: There are two components of the amortization of gains/losses. The first component is the difference
between actual versus expected returns (if expected returns are used to calculate pension expense). The
second component relates to any actuarial changes that result in gains or losses for the company.
While there is a difference between actual return versus expected return in Year 5, the actual difference will be
booked to other comprehensive income (OCI) at the end of Year 5 and subsequently amortized beginning in
Year 6. Pension expense will not be impacted until amortization begins.
In terms of actuarial gains/losses, Look Ahead Co. has a balance in OCI for the unrecognized actuarial loss of
$220,000 at the end of Year 4. This amount will be amortized using the corridor approach, which entails
comparing the unrecognized balance to a threshold equal to 10% of the greater of the fair value of plan assets
or the pension benefit obligation at the end of Year 4. For Look Ahead Co., the fair value of plan assets of
$3,310,000 is greater than the pension benefit obligation of $3,155,000. 10% of $3,310,000 is $331,000, which is
greater than the unrecognized balance of $220,000. If the unrecognized balance is less than this 10%
corridor (as it is here in Year 5), there will be no amortization.
2. $(33,100)
When a company uses the expected return on plan assets in calculating pension expense, a gain/loss will
occur if there is a difference between the actual return and the expected return. The company can choose to
either book this difference directly to the income statement in the period incurred or book it to other
comprehensive income and amortize it as part of pension expense.
For Look Ahead Co., the actual return of 4.5% is less than the expected return of 5.5%. As a result, Look
Ahead has a loss of $33,100 [$3,310,000 x (4.5% - 5.5%) = $(33,100)]. The company has chosen to recognize
this loss in the current period.
3. Decrease
Interest cost will decrease due to the decrease in the discount rate, resulting in pension expense decreasing.
4. Decrease
The increase in the average remaining service life will decrease the annual amortization of prior service cost,
which will decrease pension expense.
Since Look Ahead Co. uses the expected rate of return on plan assets, an actual rate of return lower than 4.5%
will result in an even larger spread between actual versus expected return. This will increase the company s
pension loss, which will increase amortization beginning next year, but will have no impact on pension
expense in Year 5.
Solutions:
Under U.S. GAAP, all positive funded status pension plans are reported as noncurrent assets.
2. Service/Interest Cost
$21,000 | $6,930 |
For GAAP purposes, Stanhope accounts for bad debts using the allowance method and has an Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts of $21,000. For tax purposes, the direct write-off method is used and no allowance is
recorded. Therefore, there is a $21,000 ($21,000 GAAP allowance - $0 tax allowance) temporary difference
between GAAP accounting and tax accounting. This $21,000 temporary difference represents future write-offs
that will be deducted for tax purposes when the write-offs actually occur. Future tax deductions result in deferred
tax assets.
The deferred tax asset to be reported is equal to the total temporary difference times the enacted future tax rate,
which is the company's effective tax rate of 33%:
$767,000 | | $253,110
A temporary difference exists because Stanhope is using the straight-line method for GAAP purposes and
accelerated methods for tax purposes. Because tax depreciation exceeds GAAP depreciation, this temporary
difference results in a deferred tax liability. The total temporary difference of $767,000 is equal to the difference
between the GAAP accelerated depreciation of $1,510,000 and the tax accelerated depreciation of $2,277,000.
The deferred tax liability is equal to the total temporary difference times the company's effective tax rate of 33%:
$8,000 | | $2,640
A temporary difference exists because unrealized gains of $8,000 have been recognized in net income for GAAP
purposes, but for tax purposes, the gains will not be recognized as taxable income until the securities are sold.
Because the gains represent future taxable income, the $8,000 temporary difference results in a deferred tax
liability.
The deferred tax liability is equal to the total temporary difference times the company's effective tax rate of 33%:
PART 2
Under U.S. GAAP, deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are classified as current or noncurrent based on
the following criteria:
1. Deferred tax items should be classified as current or noncurrent based on the classification of the related
asset or liability for financial reporting purposes.
2. Deferred tax items not related to an asset or liability should be classified as current or noncurrent based on
the expected reversal date of the temporary difference.
The $6,930 deferred tax asset related to the allowance for doubtful accounts is classified as current because
accounts receivable is a current asset. The $2,640 deferred tax liability related to the unrealized gain on trading
securities is classified as current because trading securities are (generally) classified as current. GAAP requires
that current deferred tax assets be offset against current deferred tax liabilities and presented as one amount.
Therefore, a net current deferred tax asset is reported on the balance sheet:
The $253,110 deferred tax liability related to tax accumulated depreciation in excess of GAAP accumulated
depreciation is classified as a noncurrent deferred tax liability because fixed assets as classified as noncurrent.
Source of answer for this question:
DR Cash $24,000
CR Treasury stock $20,000
CR APIC, treasury stock 4,000
DR Cash $14,000
DR APIC, treasury stock 4,000
DR Retained earnings 2,000
CR Treasury stock $20,000
Elimination of previous treasury stock transaction "gains" accounted for through additional paid-in capital
scheduled from the previous entry:
Accounting for any unabsorbed treasury stock loss through retained earnings after elimination of additional
paid-in capital, treasury stock:
Additional paid-in capital from retirement may be computed on a per share basis, as per above, or simply
plugged to bring the journal entry into balance.
Bayshore Industries, Inc.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended December 31, Year 2
1. An indirect method statement of cash flows always starts with net income/loss. For this question, net
income is obtained from the statement of income and retained earnings. For other questions, it might have
to be calculated from an analysis of the retained earnings account, but that is not necessary for this
question because the amount is given.
2. Almost all indirect method statements of cash flow have a depreciation and amortization "add-back."
Depreciation (and amortization) is sometimes given; for this question, it must be calculated, and it is
calculated from the accumulated depreciation from the balance sheets, the disposal of the equipment from
the other information, and the information about amortization. The starting point is an Account Analysis
Format of the accumulated depreciation account, as follows:
For this question, the statement requires both depreciation and amortization. Amortization can be
determined from the accumulated amortization balances from the balance sheets as $7,200 ($28,800 -
$21,600). The total depreciation and amortization add back is thus $447,700 [$440,500 + $7,200].
Remember that depreciation and amortization are always add-backs under the indirect method because
they were subtracted to get to net income in the first place. Now that we are working backwards from net
income for the statement of cash flows, they are added.
3. The next few line items on this indirect method statement of cash flows are differences in current assets
and liabilities. For this question, we can start with the change in accounts receivable, which is an increase
of $1,463,000 (identified directly from the given balance sheets). The next question is whether an increase
in accounts receivable should be added or subtracted, and there are many different ways to remember
whether to add or subtract. The one we will use for this question relates back to depreciation. Depreciation
is a decrease in the balance of an asset. Depreciation is added back. A decrease in accounts receivable
would thus also be added back. An increase in accounts receivable, like the $1,463,000 in this question,
would be subtracted from net income to arrive at net cash provided by operations. Other increases and
decreases in current assets would work the same way.
Think about it this way: Cash is a debit balance account generally, correct? And, the balance sheet always
balances (at least it should, and it always will on the CPA exam!). Therefore:
If an account that generally has a debit balance is increased, then the net balance sheet effect on
cash must be a decrease.
If an account that generally has a debit balance is decreased, then the net balance sheet effect on
cash must be an increase.
If an account that generally has a credit balance is increased, then the net balance sheet effect on
cash must be an increase.
If an account that generally has a credit balance is decreased, then the net balance sheet effect on
cash must be a decrease.
In short,
A change in a debit balance account has the OPPOSITE effect on the net balance of cash.
A change in a credit balance account has the SAME effect on the net balance of cash.
If you use another method to remember whether to add or subtract, use it. But you do need some method
so that these types of questions are easily answered by you on the CPA exam. The Becker Financial text
discusses other methods in lecture F7.
4. The next line item is the change in inventory, which is an increase of $594,000 from the balance sheet. An
increase in inventory (an asset and generally a debit balance account) would be subtracted, just like the
increase in accounts receivable.
5. The next line item is the change in prepaid expenses, which is an increase of $18,000 from the balance
sheets. An increase in prepaid expenses (an asset generally a debit balance account) would be
subtracted, just like the increases in accounts receivable and inventory.
6. The next line item is the gain or loss on disposal of property and equipment. For this question, the $18,000
amount can be obtained from the income statement. For other questions, it might have to be calculated
(original cost of $360,000 less accumulated depreciation of $319,500 = net book value of $40,500; the gain
is the proceeds of $58,500 less net book value of $40,500 = $18,000). For this question, we verified the
amount (and there was only one such disposal). Note that we really did not have to verify (as it was given
to us), but we have done this for illustrative purposes.
Gains on disposals are subtracted because they were added to get to net income in the first place. Losses
are added because they were subtracted to get to net income in the first place. (It is a coincidence that the
$18,000 for this line item is the same as the $18,000 for line item 10 and also, as will be discussed later,
the $18,000 from the line of credit.)
Note: You have likely memorized that, for the indirect method, gains and losses are adjustments to net
income to arrive at net cash provided by operations, but they did enter into the net income calculation and
they may also have been a 100% cash transaction (i.e., a cash gain or loss). So, why are they adjusted
out? Well, they are NOT from operations, right? And, the statement of cash flows also presents a section
on investing activities. The total proceeds from the disposal of the asset must be shown in the investing
activities section. If the gain (or loss) were not adjusted out of the operating section, then the statement
would not balance if the entire proceeds were used in the investing section.
7. The next line item is the change in accounts payable and accrued expenses. These accounts are typically
credit balance accounts. As discussed above in item (8), a change in a credit balance account has the
same net effect on the balance of cash. For this question, there is an increase of $475,800 from the
balance sheets. Therefore, the adjustment to net income to arrive at net cash provided by operations is to
add the increase (again, with assets, an increase is subtracted; with liabilities, an increase is added). That
is the end of the operating activities section.
10/11.
The next section is the investing activities section. Investing activities include buying something or
investing in something. For this question, property and equipment was purchased, and property and
equipment was sold. Purchases and sales must be reported separately (not netted). The calculation
requires another Account Analysis Format, this time, of the property and equipment account, as follows:
Nothing else has to be done, except to realize that the cash flow from the disposal of the equipment is the
$58,500 proceeds (obtained from the additional information). That is the end of the investing activities
section.
13. The next section is the financing activities section. Financing activities include borrowing, paying back,
and buying/selling the company's own equity (and other equity transactions). For example, they include
obtaining financing, either from inside investors (stockholders) or from outside investors (creditors, etc.).
For this question, there is an increase in the line of credit (which is short-term debt). More money was
borrowed, and it brought in $18,000 of cash flows to the company from financing activities (a positive
number on the statement of cash flows).
14. Financing activities include borrowing, paying back, and buying/selling the company's own equity (and
other equity transactions). For example, they include obtaining financing, either from inside investors
(stockholders) or from outside investors (creditors, etc.). For this question, there is a $2,000 increase in
the current portion of long-term debt and a $29,000 decrease in long-term debt. The net decrease is a
$27,000 decrease, so it is $27,000 of cash flows used for financing activities to pay down the debt (a
negative number on the statement of cash flows).
15. Financing activities include borrowing, paying back, and buying/selling the company's own equity (and
other equity transactions). For this question, there is no change in common stock or additional paid-in
capital, so no stock was issued. However, there were dividends paid (information obtained from the
statement of income and retained earnings). The $180,000 dividends are cash flows out of the company
from financing activities, or paying the dividends to those who have invested in the company (a negative
number on the statement of cash flows). That is the end of the financing activities section.
17. For an indirect method statement of cash flows, there is always a supplemental disclosure of interest paid.
(Note: interest paid is an amount that most readers of financial statements want to know. In the direct
method of the statement of cash flows, this amount is disclosed in the operations section as a separate
line item; however, this is not the case on the indirect method, so a supplemental disclosure is required.)
The interest expense from the income statement is $252,000, but it is the interest "paid" that is disclosed
on the statement of cash flows. Often, it has to be calculated, but in this question, the $250,000 was given
in the additional information.
18. For an indirect method statement of cash flows, there is always a supplemental disclosure of income taxes
paid. (Note: income taxes paid is an amount that most readers of financial statements want to know. In
the direct method of the statement of cash flows, this amount is disclosed in the operations section as a
separate line item; however, this is not the case on the indirect method, so a supplemental disclosure is
required.) The provision for income taxes from the income statement is $759,700, but it is the income
taxes "paid" that are disclosed on the statement of cash flows. Often, it has to be calculated, but in this
question, the $700,000 was given in the additional information.
The list was explained in the order in which the examiners provided the answers. There is no necessary order
to the items within each of the sections (operating, investing, and financing). The items have to be within the
correct section, however.
The statement of cash flows is divided into three categories that display the sources and uses of cash and cash
equivalents:
Operating This section displays the cash effects of the line items that make up the calculation of net
income.
Investing This section displays the cash effects of non-current asset transactions, such as purchases
and sales of fixed assets and investments and lending activities.
Financing This section displays the cash effects of borrowing, or paying back debt, and buying or selling
the equity of the company.
Solutions:
1. Operating activity
2. Investing activity
3. Investing activity
4. Financing activity
5. Financing activity
6. Operating activity
7. Financing activity
8. Operating activity
9. Operating activity
2. Decrease. Taxes paid, whether current or deferred, are a cash flow from operations (CFO) outflow under
the direct method.
3. Increase. A decrease in accounts receivable implies that overall the company collected cash on its
outstanding credit sales, which will be an increase in cash flow from operating activities.
4. No effect. Gains are subtracted from net income under the indirect method. Under the direct method,
gains are not included in the calculation of operating cash flow.
5. Decrease. This is a CFO outflow. A decrease in accounts payable implies that the company made cash
payments on amounts owed to vendors during the period.
6. No effect. The sale of an AFS security (assuming it is a non-current asset) produces a cash flow from
investing (CFI) inflow. Note that the loss itself would be an addition to net income under the indirect
method. However, the loss is not a component of the direct method calculation of operating cash flow.
7. Decrease. An increase in a prepaid expense is a cash outflow which would decrease CFO under the direct
method. Cash is paid in advance for rent prior to the warehouse being occupied or used by the company.
8. No effect. This is a cash flow from financing (CFF) outflow, regardless of whether the call price is above,
below, or at par.
10. Increase. Under U.S. GAAP, interest received on an investment is a CFO inflow, regardless of the
classification of the investment.
11. Increase. Cash received that is not earned is a CFO inflow. It will be booked as a liability until it is earned.
12. Decrease. $40,000 of cash refunded to customers for returned goods will be an actual cash outflow.
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash received from customers 1,939,100
Cash paid to suppliers (1,302,600)
Cash paid to employees (459,200)
Interest received 1,700
Dividends received 1,600
Interest paid (7,900)
Income taxes paid (26,200)
Trading security purchased (10,200)
Other operating cash paid (94,600)
Net cash provided by operating activities 41,700
Additional detail:
Interest paid is equal to interest expense because all bonds outstanding were issued at par.
Operating cash paid is the combination of prepaid rent of 49,000 and administrative expenses of 45,600.
Net cash provided by financing activities under the direct and indirect method:
Proceeds of Bond Issue 30,000
Plus Proceeds of Stock Issue 50,400
Less Dividends Paid (10,600)
69,800
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 19,500
Beginning cash and cash equivalents 37,300
Ending cash and cash equivalents 56,800
Record the journal entry and affected financial statements on the grant date, January 1, Year 1.
Explanation: No entry is required when stock options are granted. There is no effect on shareholders equity at
the time of issuance and compensation expense is not recorded because the right to use the options has not yet
been earned.
Record the journal entries to recognize compensation expense for Year 1, Year 2 and Year 3.
Debit Credit
Account
Compensation expense Stock options 50,000
Additional paid-in capital Stock options 50,000
Debit Credit
Account
Compensation expense Stock options 50,000
Additional paid-in capital Stock options 50,000
Debit Credit
Account
Compensation expense Stock options 50,000
Additional paid-in capital Stock options 50,000
Explanation: As time passes, compensation expense is recorded. One third of the total value of the options on
the grant date is recognized each year as compensation expense based on the three year vesting period for the
options. Additional paid in capital is credited for the same amount as the compensation expense.
Record the journal entry and affected financial statements assuming one half of the options were exercised
January 1, Year 4
Debit Credit
Account
Cash (25,000 X $30) 750,000
Additional Paid in Capitalstock options 75,000
Common stock (25,000 X $1.00) 25,000
Additional Paid in Capital 800,000
Explanation: The debit to cash is based on the number of options exercised times the exercise price. Previously
recorded additional paid in capital (refer to question #2) is reversed (debited). Common stock is credited based on
the number of shares purchased (25,000) times par value. The remainder is credited to additional paid in capital.
Assume the options not exercised on January 1, Year 4 expired on March 31, Year 4. Record the journal entry
needed on March 31, Year 4 to record expiration of the stock options. Select no entry if no journal entry is
required on this date.
Debit Credit
Account
Additional Paid in Capital stock options $ 75,000
Additional Paid in Capital expired stock $75,000
options
Explanation: The entry reflects reclassification of the capital from additional paid in capital stock options to
additional paid in capital expired stock options because the stock options have expired.
Source of answer for this question:
DR Cash
CR Other financing sources
DR Encumbrance control
CR Budgetary control
DR Budgetary control
CR Encumbrance control
DR Expenditures control
CR Vouchers payable
DR Expenditures control
CR Vouchers payable
DR Cash
CR Deferred inflows of resources
DR Estimated revenues
CR Appropriation control
DR Cash
CR Tax anticipation notes payable
DR Estimated revenues
CR Appropriations
CR Budgetary control
1. Special revenue
Special revenue funds are set up to account for revenues from specific taxes or other earmarked sources
that are restricted or committed to finance particular activities for a government.
2. Permanent
Permanent funds are used to report resources that are legally restricted to the extent that income, and not
principal, may be used for purposes that support the reporting government's programs.
3. Enterprise
Enterprise funds are set up to account for the acquisition and operation of governmental facilities and
services that are intended to be primarily self- supported by user charges.
4. Capital project
Capital projects funds are set up to account for resources used for the acquisition or construction of major
capital assets by a governmental unit, except those financed by proprietary or fiduciary funds.
5. Internal service
Internal service funds are set up to account for goods and services provided by designated departments on
a fee basis to other departments and agencies within a single governmental unit or to other governmental
units.
6. Agency
Agency trust funds account for resources in the temporary custody of a governmental unit. Fees are
accounted for as a liability to another fund.
1. Component unit discrete
The Winter Woods Library District is a component unit since it fails the SELF test. The entity is not
financially independent since its budget is approved by the city. Since the district does not meet the
requirements of a blended unit (governing boards are inseparable or the entity serves the serves the primary
government nearly exclusively) the district is a discretely presented component unit.
4. Primary government
The Autumn County Hospital Authority passes the SELF test and subcontracts its responsibilities. It is a
special purpose governmental unit, but it is a primary government that will have its own stand-alone financial
statements.
1. Non-reciprocal | Transfer
The monies transferred by the Tourist Development fund to meet debt service requirements that are fully
anticipated by the budget represent a non-reciprocal transaction (the Tourist Development fund will never get
the money back) and would be accounted for as a transfer in the fund financial statements.
2. Non-reciprocal | Eliminated
The monies transferred between governmental funds (the Tourist Development Fund and Debt Service Fund)
would be within the same category (governmental activities) in the government-wide financial statements. The
transaction is still non-reciprocal, but it would be eliminated in the government-wide financial statements to
avoid grossing up activity.
3. Reciprocal | Revenue
Charges made by an internal service fund are reciprocal (the internal service fund expects to be paid in
exchange for services) and would be accounted for as revenue in the fund financial statements.
4. Non-Reciprocal | Eliminated
The General Fund paid costs on behalf of another fund and was reimbursed. The expenditures should have
been accounted for in the capital projects fund. The reimbursement transaction is non-reciprocal (the general
fund expects the money back) but the reimbursement will net to zero. It will be eliminated and not be
displayed on the financial statements.
1. Fiduciary fund financial statements
Fiduciary funds are excluded from government-wide presentations and presented as fund financial
statements only.
5. Agency funds
Special assessments for which a governmental entity assumes no responsibility are accounted for in an
agency fund.
To reconcile the Fund Balance of Governmental Funds to the Net Position of Governmental Activities on the
government-wide financial statements, follow the GALS BARE mnemonic.
For differences between fund financial statement fund balances and government wide financial statement net
position related to measurement focus:
For differences between fund financial statement fund balances and government-wide financial statement net
position related to basis of accounting:
Add additional accounts receivable associated with revenue recognized under accrual vs. modified
accrual basis.
Subtract additional accounts payable associated with expenses recognized under accrual vs. modified
accrual basis.
Net change in fund b alance 750,000
Capital outlay expenditures 350,000
Debt service expenditures - principal 80,000
Debt service expenditures - interest -0-
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt (1,250,000)
Net revenue from enterprise funds -0-
Net revenue from internal service funds 15,000
Change in net position for fiduciary funds -0-
Depreciation on general governmental assets (175,000)
Change in net position, governmental activities (230,000)
To reconcile the change in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds to the change in Net Position of Governmental
Activities on the government-wide financial statements, follow the GOES BARE mnemonic.
For differences between changes in fund balance per fund financial statements and changes in net position per
governmental activities on government-wide financial statements related to measurement focus:
Subtract other financing sources associated with new debt proceeds or capital leases.
Add expenditures related to capital outlay in excess of depreciation and add expenditures related to
debt service principal.
For differences between changes in fund balance per fund financial statements and changes in net position per
governmental activities on government-wide financial statements related to basis of accounting
Add additional accrued revenue associated with earnings recognized under accrual vs. modified accrual
basis.
Subtract additional accrued expenses recognized under accrual vs. modified accrual basis.
Receipts from Customers:
Accounts Receivable Beginning 45,000
Revenues 95,000
Accounts Receivable Ending (75,000)
Receipts from customers 65,000
Payments to Suppliers:
Inventory Beginning 21,000
Other Operating Expenses (10,000)
Inventory -Ending (35,000)
Cash payments to suppliers (24,000)
Payments to Employees:
Accounts Payable Beginning 17,250
Personal Services/Contracted Services Expenses 60,000
Accounts Payable Ending (29,000)
Payments to Employees>/td> 48,250
1. Temporarily restricted - capital outlay
Assets provided to a not for profit organization that are restricted for a purpose that can be met by the
recipient organization are classified as temporarily restricted. The temporary restriction for the purpose of
asset construction is termed Temporarily Restricted - Capital Outlay.
5. Unrestricted
Cash received by a not-for-profit organization for any appropriate purpose within the context of the mission
is deemed to be unrestricted.
8. Permanently restricted
An unconditional donor restricted contribution whose use is restricted to the generation of revenue streams
is classified as permanently restricted.
1. No change in unrestricted or restricted classifications
The designation by the hospital's board of directors does not affect the classification of the asset as
unrestricted. Only an external donor's stipulation can cause an asset to be designated as temporarily or
permanently restricted.
2. $6,500
Investment income represents a combination of both interest received as well as changes in market value.
Earned $ 9,500
FMV/receipt (89,000)
FMV/year end 86,000
Earnings less change in value $ 6,500
3. $115,000
Community Service, Inc. will classify expenses as program expenses and supporting expenses. Support
will be further analyzed as either administration or fund-raising. The candidate is required to classify various
expenses given in the problem and to arrive at program expense as follows:
In arriving at this answer, candidates are required to ignore the value of volunteer services, properly classify
the expenses associated with specific fund raising appeals as general administration (in keeping with the
policy described in the situation), distinguish between administrative and fund-raising expenses listed as
Other cash operating expenses, properly classify interest expenses as administrative expense and
recognize that principal liquidations are irrelevant to expense classifications for purposes of not-for-profit
financial statements.
4. $2,750
General fund-raising expenses. Community services will classify expenses associated with printing and
mailing pledge cards as general fund-raising expense.
5. $-0-
Income on long-term investments - unrestricted. Community Services has no long-term investments -
unrestricted according to the situation. No income would be recognized.
6. $-0-
Community Services received donated hours from concerned citizens to serve meals to the homeless. The
skill levels required for this task failed to meet revenue recognition criteria (SOME). Community Services
need not recognize any revenue for contributed voluntary services of the type described.
1. O - Cash flows from operating activities
Increases in Unrestricted Net Assets would be treated in a manner consistent with net income in
commercial accounting applications. Operating transactions of this character would be classified as cash
flows from operating activities for purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows.
4. Asset | No classification
The receivable becomes cash but it is still temporarily restricted until the building is built. The asset box is
checked because the pledge receivable decreases and cash increases (assets are impacted), but there is
no change in total assets.
Temporarily restricted net assets (note that temporarily restricted net assets decrease):
Unrestricted
2. $0
The volunteer services that provide companionship fail the SOME test. No specialized skills are required for
the work and, if not provided by volunteers, it would likely not be provided at all. Barter will not recognize any
revenue or expense.
3. $25,000
Barter's revenues would include the value of the skilled carpenter since it passes the SOME test and the
carpenter "enhanced a physical asset." It would also include the unskilled labor associated with the project
since the labor "enhanced a physical asset." Barter would recognize $25,000 in revenue ($13,000 +
$12,000).
4. $100,000
The medical services pass the SOME test. They are partially defrayed ($20,000) so the revenue from
contributed services would be $100,000 ($120,000 - $20,000).
Source of answer for this question:
FASB ASC 958-605-25-16
Keyword: Donated services
1. The underlying is $50/share.
3. The initial net investment is the premium paid by XYZ of $1/share or $1,000.
Settlement Options:
5. True
The option writer delivers 1,000 shares of ABC Company stock to XYZ in exchange for $50,000.
This is a settlement option for this option contract. The terms of the option allow XYZ to purchase 1,000
shares of ABC stock from the option writer for $50,000 ($50/share).
6. True
The option writer can pay $10,000 to XYZ to settle the contract.
This is a settlement option for this option contract. Derivative instruments allow net settlement. In this case,
the option writer must provide 1,000 shares of ABC stock to XYZ in exchange for $50,000. Because the
market price of the shares is $60,000 (1000 shares x $60/share market price) but the option writer has agreed
to accept $50,000 from XYZ, the option writer has a loss of $10,000 on the option contract. Instead of
delivering the actual shares to XYZ, the option writer can instead settle the contract by paying XYZ the
$10,000. $10,000 is equal to the amount XYZ would realize if it paid $50,000 to the option writer for the 1,000
shares and then sold those shares at the market price of $60/share.
7. False
The option writer has the option to pull out of the contract rather than incur a loss.
This is not a settlement option for this option contract. An option contract is called an option because the
purchaser (XYZ) has the "option" to not use the contract if the terms are unfavorable. For example, if the
market price of the ABC stock had stayed below $50 during the 30 days, then XYZ would not have exercised
the option. The option writer does not have the "option" to pull out of the contract if the option terms become
unfavorable. When the option writer sold the option to ABC, the option writer assumed the risk that it would
incur a loss if the market price of ABC rose above $50 during the 30-day period.
1. The underlying is $1.44/.
3. The initial net investment is $0. There is no initial net investment on forward contracts.
Settlement Options:
5. True
XYZ receives $144,000 from the other party to the contract in exchange for 100,000.
This is a settlement option for this forward contract. The terms of the contract state that XYZ will deliver
100,000 and receive $144,000 (100,000 x $1.44/).
6. False
XYZ receives $152,000 from the other party to the contract in exchange for 100,000.
This is not a settlement option for this forward contract. The spot rate on the settlement date does not
determine the amount XYZ will receive in exchange for the 100,000 under the forward contract. Because the
spot rate of $1.52/ is higher than the forward contract rate of $1.44/, XYZ will actually get less for the
100,000 under the forward contract than XYZ would have received if XYZ had sold the 100,000 for the spot
rate of $1.52/ on February 28.
7. False
This is not a settlement option for this forward contract. Although derivative instruments do permit a net
settlement, in this case the net settlement would be an $8,000 payment by XYZ to the other party to the
forward contract. $8,000 represents XYZ's loss on the forward contract because under the contract terms
XYZ must sell the 100,000 for $144,000 when the market value of the 100,000 is $152,000 (100,000 x
$1.52/ spot rate). If XYZ makes the net settlement payment of $8,000 to the other party and then sells the
100,000 outside the contract for $152,000, the net amount XYZ will realize from the sale of the 100,000 will
still be $144,000 ($152,000 received - $8,000 paid on forward contract = $144,000).
1. Cash flow hedge | $0 | ($15,000)
The risk related to the variable-rate debt is that future interest payments (cash outflows) will increase as
interest rates increase. Therefore, the interest rate swap is a cash flow hedge in which the company receives
a floating rate of interest (essentially a reimbursement of the floating-rate interest paid on the debt) and pays a
fixed-rate of interest. This "converts" the floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. Because this is a cash flow
hedge, the unrealized loss will be reported in other comprehensive income.
A gain is recorded in OCI because XYZ has "locked in" the selling price of $85/barrel with the short position
in the forward contract and the forward price has fallen to $79/barrel.
A gain is recorded in OCI because the forward price has fallen from $79/barrel to $71/barrel and XYZ has a
short position in the forward contract.
DR Cash $140,000
XYZ records the cash received from the net settlement of the cash flow hedge:
4. February 1, Year 2
When the oil is sold, XYZ reclassifies the gain on the hedge from OCI to earnings. The net impact on
earnings from the sales revenue plus the gain equals $850,000 ($710,000 + $140,000). The forward contract
allowed XYZ to "lock in" the selling price of $85/barrel.
1. The asset (Asset Retirement Cost, ARC) is debited for $530,555, which is calculated as the
estimated cost of $710,000 multiplied by the PV Factor of 0.74726 in order to discount it to
todays dollars. The liability (Asset Retirement Obligation, ARO) is credited for the same
$530,555.
DR Asset Retirement Cost (ARC) 530,555
CR Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO) 530,555
2. Accretion expense is calculated as the balance in the liability account multiplied by the
accretion rate. The beginning balance in the liability account is $530,555. Multiplying that by
6% results in a Year 1 expense of $31,833 (rounded to the nearest dollar).
The fast way: Total estimated cost ($710,000) Total depreciation ($530,555) = Total Accretion
Expense ($179,445)
The long way: Add individual accretion expenses for each of the five years .
4. Increase: The liability that is currently reflected at present value ($530,555) will be increased
every year such that in 5 years, it will reflect the estimated asset retirement obligation of
$710,000. The accretion rate of 6% is assessed every year on the liability that year, which is
always increasing.
5. Depreciation expense of $ 106,111 ($530,555 depreciated straight- line over 5 years) will
be booked, with an offsetting entry of $106,111 to accumulated depreciation. Accretion
expense of $31,833 (calculated earlier) will also be booked, with an offsetting increase to the
ARO liability account.
4. S - $26,500,000