Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
3
Tesco Val. 2L Vani
Refurbish Fleet
70%
Phase I
trial
35 40
30%
Fail
deliveries
Competitor 4:
Competitor 3:
Competitor 2: 92
150
Competitor 1: 9
Air et Inc.: 11
30
5
The Interview Process
Acknowledgements
Career Services would like to thank the following companies for their generous
contribution to the London Business School Case Book.
London Business School Case Book 1
Contents
Marakon
How to Ace Case Interviews 9
Air et Inc. 78
Overview of Case Interviews 9
Tackling a Case Interview A step-by-step illustration 10
stimation Cases 15 McKinsey & Company 3
Brainteasers 17
Major Types of Business Case 18 OldPharma 83
The one month emergency action plan 23 Refresh ow Soda 89
Overview 24 Footloose 96
The Importance of Fit 24
Criterion Based uestioning 25
Two key Why do you want to ...? questions 26 Roland Berger Strategy Consultants 1 6
Do you have any questions for me? 27
A Two-Way Process 27 Mobile Phone Company MPC Market Share ain 106
Additional Resources 28 Private et Co P C Fleet Renewal 108
Case Competitions 11
BC
ohnson and ohnson 119
Iceberg 50
Cupids Arrow 55 M A Trocar Business Case 119
2 London Business School Case Book
Foreword
elcome
Cases are real-life business problems, usually complex We hope you will nd this Case Book useful in a number
or ambiguous enough that a management team engages of ways:
valuable consulting support to solve them. We hope you An introduction to t and case interviews
will approach the cases in this Ofcial LBS Case Book, not A theoretical guide how to address cases, what
with the narrow aim of convincing employers to hire you, interviewers are looking for
but with a spirit of intellectual curiosity that drives your A source of practice cases from a number of rms to
enjoyment of the interview process and a problem-solving do with friends colleagues anyone who will help
career beyond that. An insight into the type of answers you might give to a
particular case this is only a guide there are no right
Case interviews are not just used by consulting rms. answers
Other rms use them in business school hiring, especially A reference to at least some additional resources
for internal consulting and corporate strategy roles, and available elsewhere
they are a great way to hone your business problem solving
skills. It just remains for us to wish you all the best
Practise lots
We are sure you will nd that Practise, Practise, Practise
is the best preparation. People often ask us how much
practice is enough? There are two answers the minimum Consulting Careers Team
is practise until you feel condent the maximum is practise Career Services
with all your energy until you have nothing left to give. ondon Business School
London Business School Case Book 3
Business udgement
Focusing on where the real problem is Can they
identify the big buckets and smell money
Logical and well-structured approach
Can you identify the key issues and address these in
a logical and structured way?
Using frameworks only if they are appropriate not
shoehorning the case into the last framework they
learned
Clearly summarising conclusions so far at each
stage of the case
Creativity
Coming up with alternative ideas or creative
suggestions
Credibility
Will you be taken seriously by the client?
Are you someone that other people will listen to?
London Business School Case Book
Demonstrating leadership
Leadership is incredibly important to consultants. ot only
do MBA level and above hires enter rms in positions of
leadership e.g. leading junior analysts in day-to-day work , Maturity
but all consultants are essentially expected to lead clients Balance of gravitas and enthusiasm
towards good, implementable solutions. Plus consulting Able to draw on experience to inform opinion
rm culture tends to place extra curricular leadership Clear and concise
requirements of one sort or another on all members of uestions and disagrees appropriately
the rm.
Your leadership abilities are assessed during both the case Integrity
and t interviews, but primarily through exploring your Solving the problem posed
track record as a leader in the t section, as it is hard to Responding to the questions actually asked
demonstrate real leadership abilities during a case interview. ot trying to bend the rules
Inspirational
Demonstrates real insights
Passionate about creative new ideas willing to stick
with them when tested
Track record
Uses appropriate interpersonal styles and methods
to inspire and guide individuals or teams towards
achieving a common goal
Takes a lead in the interview drives to completion,
insight and results
Solid track record of leadership achievements e.g.
sporting clubs, military
London Business School Case Book
Other interests
Sum up: Demonstrating success in activities outside the
Are you both interested, and interesting? work arena
Tip: The challenge that you face consulting, then you might want to Identify these areas quickly, both by
in interviewing is to convey your consider other career options. looking at your past performance in
excellence on all of these dimensions interviews and by internalising the
in a 45 minute time period. With understanding of what is feedback given to you from mock
required of you and practice, you will interviews at London Business
Your ability to achieve this goal is a nd that many of the elements listed School, and work actively to improve
function of three things: innate ability, above come across naturally. If you your ability to convey them to an
understanding of what is required of are a quantitative and or engaging interviewer.
you, and practice & self-awareness. person, you will come across as so in
There is little you can do about innate the interview without thinking about In every interview, you must also
ability, though the very fact that you it. You still need to practise, however, maintain signicant self-awareness
are a student at London Business since these natural predilections will of how you are being or might be
School suggests that you have the easily be masked if you enter the perceived. Actively manage the
ability to get a job in consulting. interview unprepared or nervous. image you are conveying. That may
If, however, you know that you are Practice will also help you identify seem like a lot to think about while
not strong on a number of the skills the areas that dont naturally come youre also trying to solve a complex
highlighted in the previous section across for you in a short interview. case, but it is very important.
as being critical to success in
London Business School Case Book 9
Many recruiters consulting companies in particular will An interviewer may use any or all of three types of cases
test for a high degree of competence in the area of solving during a case interview:
complex, business problems. A management consultant
is, above all else, a problem solver and therefore this is
the core skill that recruiters look for when interviewing Business Case
candidates. You are the C O of an insurance company. You want
to launch an e-commerce business that is synergistic
Consulting rms use case interviews because cases give with your current insurance products, but which is
them the opportunity to see how a candidate thinks about not an insurance product. How do you decide what
business problems and tests a candidates ability to solve this on-line business should sell and who it should
these business problems. sell to?
Case interviews also give the candidate some insight into The majority of consulting interviews are Business Cases
the type of work that consultants conduct. If you do not because it is the only case type that really tests the skills
en oy solving problems during a case interview, it may be an that a recruiter is looking for, and also demonstrates the
indication that, in fact, a career in consulting is not for you. work that a consultant will be required to do once in the job.
Firm C makes tin cans. It is planning to expand its An interviewer may throw in a Brainteaser, but will virtually
manufacturing capacity and is debating whether to add never use a brainteaser as the sole case in an interview.
to its existing plant or build a new plant. What would you The problem with brainteasers is that they are binary the
recommend that it does? candidate either gets them or doesnt.
Business Cases
Its the same with solving business cases. When you get a case posed in an interview, dont just think, Oh no, I have to
solve this huge problem in one go . Solving a case successfully consists of running through the following four basic steps:
Step 1 Listen and Clarify Step 2 Structure Step 3 Analyse Step Conclude
nsure complete Develop approach to solve Request information to test Synthesise ndings into
understanding of business problem: hypothesis: recommendations:
issue: Structure problem Ask questions and Summarise your ndings
Listen carefully Identify key issues & collect information not just by recapping
Take notes if it helps you prioritise Develop, test and rene your analysis draw out
Ask clarifying questions Formulate an initial hypothesis key facts
as needed hypothesis Iterate Make a recommendation
Take time to evaluate the Articulate approach & Hone in on the solution Add next steps
information given hypothesis Verbalise your thought
process
London Business School Case Book 11
Step 1 Listen and Clarify Step 2 Structure Step 3 Analyse Step Conclude
The interviewer will introduce the case to you by giving Clarifying questions
A bit of background, e.g. type of industry, who your client
is The interviewer may have used terms that you are not
Describing the specic business situation familiar with ask him her to explain what those terms
iving you some initial information mean.
One thing is vital make sure that you listen very carefully. Clarifying questions show that you are taking a real
Take notes. Make sure that you take a pen and paper with interest and demonstrate that you are serious about fully
you into the interview. The importance of listening cannot be understanding the business problem posed.
emphasised enough.
If you dont make sure that you understand what the
interviewer is asking you to do upfront you are denying
Tip: You will create a very bad impression if you need yourself the opportunity to perform well in the interview. In
the interviewer to repeat the question or if, through not general, you should not need to ask more than one or two
listening, you have missed the key facts and therefore clarifying questions, and it is ne if you dont have any.
go on to solve the wrong case or fail to focus on the
important issues in the case. Take time to evaluate the information
A minutes silence will feel like a long time to both you and
the interviewer.
Step 1 Listen and Clarify Step 2 Structure Step 3 Analyse Step Conclude
Using the Prot Revenue Costs equation is a good As you conduct your analysis throughout the case interview,
structure to start with. Company As declining prots remember to relate your ndings back to your initial
could be due to loss in revenues price x volume or hypothesis: This seems to support my initial hypothesis . ,
increase in costs xed costs variable costs . This seems to refute my initial hypothesis , and if you are
refuting your initial hypothesis indicate that Actually, is
more likely to be where the solution to this problem lies .
The interviewer may have given you a hint early on which
might steer you towards a particular path rst. Otherwise
that might become clear as you progress through the
pathways you have laid out.
Step 1 Listen and Clarify Step 2 Structure Step 3 Analyse Step Conclude
The analysis phase should form the bulk of the case Questions
interview
There is also a skill to drawing information out of the
interviewer. Many interviewers will give candidates who they
Tip: This is an iterative process. believe are asking questions in a structured, thoughtful way
much more information that they would give to candidates
who they believe are just reeling out an unstructured
In this phase you will: laundry list of questions in the hope that they will be able to
Ask your interviewer questions piece some kind of analysis together from that laundry list.
Collect the information you need to conduct your You must only ask questions that you can justify and then
analysis demonstrate that you are using the answer to that question
Develop, test and rene your hypothesis to further your analysis and push the case forward.
And hone in on a solution based on the facts
Calculations
Tip: While asking questions is a fundamental part of the
When doing calculations, explain all of the steps you process, you must ask these questions in the context of
are taking to the interviewer. This illustrates your thought your structure and the issues you are exploring rather
process and maximises the ability of the interviewer to than just ring off questions randomly or in no particular
coach you. order.
Step 1 Listen and Clarify Step 2 Structure Step 3 Analyse Step Conclude
Once you feel that you have exhausted all the issues You may also want to add some next steps or additional
and consequently lines of analysis nish the considerations, as appropriate, to your conclusions and
interview by summarising the situation and providing a recommendations.
recommendation or recommendations This shows that you recognise the limited amount of
B Try not to just recap the analysis you have just time and information you had available in getting to your
conducted in your summary. Rather, summarise the key conclusion
things that you learnt as you performed your analysis and There may be issues you havent had the time or the
how these added together to reach your recommendation. information to address properly
Cases are short Implying to the interviewer that you
have covered every base in a complex business issue
Example: I recommend that Company A looks at ways in 30 or 40 minutes, might indicate that you are short
to reduce their indirect costs to try to reverse the slide sighted, naive or perhaps even arrogant
in protability. iven that the industry is characterised
by intense competition, it will be difcult to grow their
market share or to increase prices. Reducing CO S Tip: It is much better to make reasonable
without negatively affecting the quality of the product recommendations but also to acknowledge that you
and losing customers would be difcult. Therefore they havent been able to be completely exhaustive and
should look at other ways to save money through, for highlight the areas youd like to penetrate further if you
example, reducing factory overheads, saving money had more time .
through supply chain efciencies, reducing head ofce
costs, and improving marketing spend and sales force
efciency.
Estimation Cases
An estimation case is usually in the form of something like If you run into one of these cases:
How many gallons of white house paint are sold in the U.K. Make sure that you have claried, and therefore fully
each year? understand, the question
Remember the interviewer may deliberately not have
Other examples of estimation cases are: given you all the information
How many tube trains are there on the Underground? Another sensible, perceptive question to ask in this case
How many golf balls would t in Canary Wharf tower? is whether the paint is internal or external
If a male and a female goat are put on a deserted island The paint is actually for external walls only
that has plenty of food and water on it, what would be An interviewee may be marked down if they failed to
the islands goat population after ten years? establish that at the start, though they would probably
How many wedding dresses are sold in the UK each not fail the case on this point alone
year? Break the problem down into logical steps
How many divorces are there in the US each year? Solve each step one at a time
How many re extinguishers are there in London
Business School?
How many coke cans would t in Buckingham Palace? Tip: Always clarify when uncertain. For example, with
And so it goes on 2 the house paint case, if you do not come from the U.K
you may be unfamiliar with gallons. Ask the interviewer
what a gallon is approx 4.5 lts .
2 They could be based on anything this actually makes it very easy to practice estimation cases, because you can come up with a list of at least twenty estimation cases in
under ve minutes
16 London Business School Case Book
3 it is probably sufcient to show that you are using the relative volumes to determine how many balls would t in the building
London Business School Case Book 1
In addition to solving the case in a sensible way, the Saying things like very single person I know lives in a
interviewer will be looking for you to generate some rapport at. However, because I live in central London, Ill assume
with them that is not entirely typical is chatty and gives a little of
yourself away. It also serves to illustrate to the interviewer
that you are not just pulling your numbers out of the air
Level of detail to use in your answer This depends on whether the estimation case is given to
you as the only case in the interview or as an add-on to a
business case. You should adjust the response accordingly
Key statistics and formulae It will be useful to know some common numbers and
formulae to get you through these types of questions
Brainteasers
Brainteasers are not cases in which a technique can be learnt, mainly because a brainteaser can be about virtually anything
and posed in any way. However, brainteasers are increasingly rarely used as interviewers seem to be realising that they do
not give a good insight into a candidates ability to do the job. If you get a brainteaser, just try to stay calm and take some
time to think about the problem. Also, and very importantly, dont panic if you dont manage to solve the brainteaser. They
are binary you either get the answer or not and, if you dont, it certainly does not mean that you wont get the job. It will
just be one of many data points that the interviewer will use to make a decision.
1 London Business School Case Book
However, it must be remembered that these six categories are not mutually exclusive or completely exhaustive.
For example, a market entry case might require industry analysis, and an acquisition case may involve evaluating return on
investment.
Some cases may not t neatly into any of the six major business case types, but may incorporate certain elements from one
or more of them. xamples of some of these categories are included in the practice cases within this Case Book. Please
look out for the icons at the start of each case.
PROFIT
Prot Improvement
Example: Company As prots have declined by 30%
Prot improvement cases are probably the most common over the last eighteen months. The C O would like
business cases that you will encounter in an interview. They you to help him her understand why this protability
are also arguably one of the easiest as the problem is easily decline has happened and what he she can do to return
structured through systematically examining each aspect of Company A to protability.
the protability relationship: Prot Revenue Costs
In this business case the interviewer will typically ask you As mentioned above,
to analyse why a rms prots have decreased and what a Prots Revenues - Costs
rm could do to reverse this decline and bring itself back ri aria l o t antit
to protability. i d o t
You should ensure that you are familiar enough with each Cost related issues to consider during your analysis
of these formulae to be able to use them in a case interview include:
situation. Fixed versus variable costs
Short-run versus long-run costs
A good way to tackle this kind of case is to use the Capacity utili ation and its impact on total average cost
protability formula to structure your answer up front per unit
laying this structure out for the interviewer and then Benchmarking costs against industry competitors
exploring each dimension in detail. Relative percentage weighting of cost components:
Cost of oods Sold: labour, raw materials, overheads
In addition to the formula, you should have a sound Operating Costs: sales and distribution, marketing,
understanding of both revenue and cost related issues. general and administrative, research and
development
Revenue related issues to consider during your analysis
include: An analysis of costs will vary with the type of industry
Factors that impact price: being considered. It is very important to demonstrate
Market power sound business sense by showing the interviewer that you
Price elasticity understand, for the specic industry that you are examining
Product differentiation in your case, where the big money buckets are, i.e., that you
Opportunities for differential pricing of the same can smell the money.
product, e.g., airline seats
Methods of Pricing: cost plus, matching, market
based think about the pros and cons of each of For example, for a pharmaceutical rm, research
these and development expenses will be the biggest cost
Brand Implications, e.g. strength buckets. For an airline, xed costs i.e., leasing of or
depreciation on the planes, fuel costs, landing fees,
Factors that impact volume: maintenance costs are huge. In the case of a rm with
xternal factors: multiple products, how the company is allocating their
Competition share of market, positioning image, costs between the products and, therefore, their ability
customers, protability, differentiation, future to properly understand which products are making
plans a positive contribution and which are not, may be an
Substitutes complements important issue.
Market forces declining market si e, technology,
regulation
Customers needs latent vs demonstrated, price
sensitivity, segmentation product extension IND STR
ANA SIS
Internal factors:
Distribution channels Industry Analysis
Manufacturing capacity
Logistics supply chain inventory management With an industry analysis case an interviewer will ask you
to evaluate the structure and or desirability of a particular
rowth strategies: industry.
Sell more existing products to existing customers
Sell existing products to new customers
Sell new products to existing customers Example: Your client is the C O of Company B, a
Sell new products to new customers think of U.K manufacturer of rolling stock for the railways. He
product extensions she would like you to help him her understand whether
the rolling stock industry a good one to be in. Why or
why not?
Tip: ew products do not need to be completely new.
A line extension, e.g., Diet Coke, is classed as a new
product, so remember line extensions when thinking Porters 5 Forces is a tool to analyse industry attractiveness,
growth strategies but if you are going to use this to structure your answer,
ensure that you dont say to the interviewer Oh, an
industry analysis case, Ill use Porters 5 Forces.
2 London Business School Case Book
Analyse customer needs: Highlight this prioritised list during a summary of the
Segmentation si e, protability, share, growth preceding discussion, in order to build up to a go no go
Drivers of purchase behaviour product, price, recommendation. It is perfectly acceptable to say that you
promotion and place need further information in certain areas, but that your initial
Power in the market hypothesis is:
Identify gaps in customer needs We should or should not explore this business opportunity
further .
Match between the company s strengths and those
needed for the new market:
Core competencies
Product service portfolio CAPACIT
E PANSION
Differentiation
Management
Workforce Capacity Expansion
Key skills
Resources - can the rm establish a competitive Capacity expansion cases usually revolve around how a rm
advantage v- key success factors can optimally increase its output potential.
Potential positioning and price positioning
Source of volume - steal share from whom? or
expand category? Example: Your client, the C O of Company D has
iche or mass strategy? decided that he she needs to expand Company Ds
Cost structure - scale v- scope economies manufacturing capacity and is considering either
Capital expenditure required building a new plant in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, or
Potential returns increasing the scale of its current plant in Singapore.
Which would you recommend that it do?
Evaluate barriers to entry
Customer-related:
Product differentiation A good approach to tackling capacity expansion cases is:
Brand loyalty 1 stimate the potential benet of capacity expansion by
Switching costs quantifying market demand and potential revenue gains
Access to distribution channels 2 valuate the means of capacity expansion existing
on-Customer-related: plant or new plant? . Issues to consider here include
Proprietary technology availability of desirable location for a new plant,
conomies of scale proximity to customers and suppliers, transportation
Capital requirements costs, cost and availability of labour, technology, time
xperience curve required to complete expansion, capital costs of new v-
Regulation existing plant
3 Market considerations
Evaluate methods of entry 4 Impact on industry demand & pricing: will expansion
Build, acquire, partner? create excess capacity in the market?
uantify investment cost and risk 5 Likely competitive response
6 Cost Benet analysis
Analyse how rm has entered markets in the past 7 Alternatives: investigate other options to ensure that you
whether has it been successful or unsuccessful have fully analysed the problem other options could
and why include outsourcing, leasing or acquisition of an existing
plant.
Bear in mind this is a very long list, and will not all apply in
each case. It is vital, having used this approach to structure As in the earlier cases you need to summarise your
your thought processes and initial discussion on the topic, analysis, in order to support a go no go recommendation.
to identify a prioritised list of those areas that seem to be It is perfectly acceptable to say that you need further
the biggest potential issues factors in the decision making. information in certain areas, but that your initial hypothesis
is: We should or should not explore this business
opportunity further .
22 London Business School Case Book
Potential synergies: When approaching acquisition cases, Tip: While you may not have enough information to
the easiest thing to remember is will 1 1 3?, i.e. will the answer many of the questions above, indicating that you
acquisition add value over and above the value of the two understand the importance of these questions is useful,
component companies? so do bring up a few. They are all questions that you
would nd critical to answer in coaching a rm through
nderstand the acquiring company s line of an acquisition to demonstrate that you understand what
business: this type of analysis is likely to focus on.
Core competencies
Cost structure
Structure of the industry in which it currently As in the earlier cases, you need to summarise your analysis
competes in order to support go no go recommendation. It is perfectly
acceptable to say that you need further information in
Assess the rationale for acquisition e g hy is certain areas, but that your initial hypothesis is: We should
the company considering the acquisition hat or should not explore this business opportunity further .
potential synergies exist
Acquire resources: increase capacity, increase
distribution, broaden product line, improve
technology, human capital, brand name, customers
network effect
Decrease costs: economies of scale, economies of
scope brand, distribution, advertising, sales force,
management talent, etc. , climb the learning curve
more quickly
Other strategic rationales
Determine why the rm is considering the investment As in the earlier cases, you need to summarise your analysis
in order to support go no go recommendation. It is perfectly
acceptable to say that you need further information in
certain areas, but that your initial hypothesis is: We should
or should not explore this business opportunity further .
mail to nd people Read or practise 2 cases Practise at least 1 case Continue reading
interested in practising per day. Practise at least a day with friends. If you business articles,
case interviews with you 3 market si e estimation run out of cases, have a practising behavioral
questions during the week friend make up one based questions, and doing
Practise answering t on recent business news mock case interviews
questions. Focus on very day, read 2 FT stories with friends
concrete examples articles. For each, identify
illustrating your the main business issue, Continue reading business Meet with someone
achievements, role on and spend 15m developing articles and practising from industry. Ask
teams, leadership and an issue tree for the case behavioral questions about the company,
analytical abilities as if for interview. Discuss their experience, and
with your case buddy, and if they can give you a
Reach out to 1or 2 see what other areas they case provide feedback
people in industry and would have considered. on your resume. Its
network. et at least Youre striving to learn to vitally important to
1 lunch scheduled for structure things in a M C have someone review
weeks 3 4, after youve way your resume before
practised cases. Dont things get too serious.
only ask them to look at Practise 1 different t Its also useful to get
your resume they can question per day, in front a professional opinion
also give you a practice of a mirror or with a friend on your current case-
case with instant cracking ability
feedback
2 London Business School Case Book
Fit Interviewing
Overview
In addition to your case interviews, you will be given one or more t interviews during the consulting interview process with
each rm. These interviews may either be combined with the case interview hybrid case and t or conducted separately,
depending on the rm.
Fit Interviewing
eneral experience
Knowledge attitudes
Probe
Specic examples
e
Pr
ob
ob
Pr
e
Pr
e
ob
Probe
ob
Pr
In criterion based questioning, the interviewer will explore An explanation of the six probing questions is as follows:
in detail the candidates experience and ability on a specic
criterion5, e.g., drive, teamwork, entrepreneurial spirit. eneral experience:
Problem Solving: criterion tested mainly through the The amount of experience a candidate has had overall in
case using developing that criterion
Personal Impact: criterion listening understanding xample Desire to excel: How important has working
responding, empathy, in uencing, teamwork, condence hard and being driven been in your career to date?
v- ego, sense of humour
Leadership: criterion integrity, maturity, willingness to Specic examples:
take personal risks, ability to take initiative Specic examples where a candidate displayed that
Drive and Motivation: criterion enthusiasm, desire to criterion
excel, self-development, energy, perseverance xample Desire to xcel: Describe a previous
achievement for which you had to strive
The interviewer will explore these criteria by probing the
interviewee in detail on the six different topics highlighted Self evaluation:
in the slide above, though of course they will probably not How the candidate assessed his her ability on that
run through all six probing questions for each and every criterion
criterion they are testing an interviewee on, because of time xample Desire to xcel: Could you have done more to
constraints. make sure you achieved your full potential over the past
three years?
Fit Interviewing
Fit Interviewing
few reasons why that rm is the best t for you. Read the However, do not put yourself under undue stress
website, go to the companys presentation, talk to their researching little known facts about the rm or trying to
representatives after the presentation, read the Who are come up with genius questions that no-one else will ever
the consultants? presentation on portal, use the Consulting have thought of. The interviewer is only trying to assess that
Club discussion threads and talk to Career Services. your interest in their rm is genuine and that you have good
reasons to back up this interest. Keep that in mind when
youre preparing answers to this question.
A Two ay Process
Fit interviews are very much two-way conversations It is also very important to go to interviews having
between the interviewer and interviewee. You should feel condence in yourself and your abilities. As I mentioned
that you are interviewing the rm as much as they are earlier, students can be too concerned about being career
interviewing you. In addition to having insightful questions changers forgetting that 80% of people who go through
about the rm, try to analyse the people that you are the consulting selection process are career changers.
speaking with when youre interviewing with that rm. If you
get the job, you will also need to sit on a ten-hour ight with
people similar to your interviewers and work very, very long Tip: Do not feel that you have to apologise for your past
often stressful hours with them. Is that really something career choices. However, as mentioned previously, do
you want to do? have a good story that illustrates a train of thought
running through your career decisions.
Career Search is not just about getting a job any job . It is
about getting the right ob even though it may be hard to
remember that at times. The recruitment opportunities at Also think hard about what you have learnt and how this
London Business School especially if you are participating learning applies to a new career in consulting. There are
in on-campus recruitment are unlike anything else you will aspects of almost any job that can relate to consulting.
experience in your life. You have a whole array of fantastic Consulting rms are looking to hire the best people,
rms all wanting to hire talented students all of whom regardless of background, so remember that and have
are prepared to come to you and lay out their wares. Make condence when you interview.
sure that you dont waste that opportunity by not having the
condence to ensure that the rm you end up working for is
the one you really want to work for. etting the job is not the
only goal here. The goal is to be happy and professionally
satised long after you have left London Business School,
whether that is in consulting or in another eld altogether.
2 London Business School Case Book
Fit Interviewing
Additional Resources
Career Services Portal Pages Previous London Business School and other B-schools
Career Services training sessions for consulting case books
Consulting Club posts Portal and Campus roups Vault and WetFeet guides
Firms websites DO OT go to an interview with a rm www.caseinterview.com
before you go on its website
Ach ieve RESULTS.
Bain people gain the best practical business experience. Working across issues, industries and organizations, we develop
strategic insights that clients can act on, and then we rally those organizations into action to make sure the results stick.
Along the way, we amass an incomparable breadth of experience, building a foundation for wherever our paths may take
us, whether thats continuing to deliver results for Bains clients, starting businesses, leading companies or driving social
change. Every assignment is a new opportunityto learn, to grow, to influence, to impress and to make lasting connections.
What will you achieve?
www.joinbain.com
Grow Further.
E.ON
the regional and global units. In 2012, we covered a
portfolio of over 100 projects. We work as alternative
to and in full competition with external top
Anne www.eon.com/en/
Bicking careers/professionals/
consultants.html
Follow us on:
you will
BC
E K Consulting
Marakon
Monitor Deloitte
Complication
While ticket sales and revenues have continued to grow steadily, protability growth has lagged
Key question
What is the root cause of the clients lagging protability?
Please follow the steps below to guide you through the case.
Frame the Use framework to Dig deeper Develop insights Synthesise what Make a
problem guide analysis you learned recommendation
Prot
Revenue Cost
Note for Interviewer: The quantitative component of this case is very straight forward. Intent is for the bulk of the interview
to be spent on the qualitative elements.
Copyright 2010-2011 by Bain & Company, Inc. All rights reserved
London Business School Case Book 3
Entertainment Co
Frame the Use framework to Dig deeper Develop insights Synthesise what Make a
problem guide analysis you learned recommendation
iven this framework, what questions would you ask your interviewer?
Revenues Costs
Has there been a What has happened How have Fixed How have Variable
signicant change in to # of tickets sold in Costs FC changed Costs VC changed
ticket prices? past ve years? in past ve years? in past ve years?
Interviewer: Average ticket price Ticket sales volume FC have grown as VC from stop to stop
changes from stop varies greatly the client has added are generally very
to stop. Cities with from stop to stop. more tour stops. consistent. Primary
largely wealthy ntertainment Co. is FC are generally drivers of differences
populations typically more popular in some allocated by length are venue rental
have higher avg ticket places than others of stop
prices
Entertainment Co
CA R
$1,000M
05 10
875
800
Entertainment Co revenue
767
743
652
603
600
488
400 12%
200
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
50%
Entertainment Co prot margin
25
-25
-50
-75
City 9
City 8
City 7
City 6
City 5
City 4
City 3
City 21
City 20
City 2
City 19
City 18
City 17
City 16
City 15
City 14
City 13
City 12
City 11
City 10
City 1
Entertainment Co
Frame the Use framework to Dig deeper Develop insights Synthesise what Make a
problem guide analysis you learned recommendation
Hints
Exhibit 1: Interviewee should immediately recognise disparity in growth of revenues and prot.
Exhibit 2: Interviewee should point out that the unprotable shows have shorter LOR and occupancy rates.
Entertainment Co
Develop a hypothesis that you can test dig deeper into the drivers that matter
Hypothesis: Entertainment Co s slow growth in protability is a result of expansion to markets that are
unprotable or marginally protable
Revenues Costs
Interviewee: Avg ticket price Attendance ranges Fixed costs which Variable costs range
varies from $100 from 75K to 210K are allocated by run from $50-60K
to $80 as result of different length vary from $4M
run lengths and to $8M
occupancy rates
Entertainment Co
Frame the Use framework to Dig deeper Develop insights Synthesise what Make a
problem guide analysis you learned recommendation
What insights can you draw from the data you have?
Key insights
Interviewee: It appears that ntertainment Co. is growing ticket sales and revenue at the
expense of protability
They should be more selective about the markets that they enter. Several
possibilities exist for continued growth.
Stay longer in the good markets and dont go to the bad markets
Reduce cost of the show
Develop a lower cost show format for the marginal cities
Combination of the above
Interviewer: Reducing the cost of the show is not an option for artistic reasons
We have some data on ticket sales by week in two markets that I would like you to
analy e
ntertainment Co. has launched a new lower cost format show in a few markets. The
new show will be performed in Ice-rinks rather than in Theatres like the current show
I have the initial prot analysis of the most recent Theatre and Ice-rink show in three
markets for you to analy e
Entertainment Co
City A City C
3,000 3,000
Tickets sold
1,000 1,000
0 0
Show 1
Show 10
Show 19
Show 28
Show 37
Show 46
Show 55
Show 64
Show 72
Show 81
Show 7
Show 14
Show 21
Show 28
Show 35
Show 42
Key Insights
City A: Some markets continue to have strong attendance throughout suggesting that they could add additional shows
without dramatically decreasing occupancy
City C: Other markets already see a signicant drop-off in sales by the end, suggesting that there is no additional
capacity for adding shows and that the city may not be able to adequately utili e the Theatre format with its very high FC
Entertainment Co
Exhibit Ice rink format introduced in 2 1 to offer lower cost option for younger people families
105
100
Ice-rink
2.0
75
65
50
Theatre Theatre
1.0
84%
25
0.0 0.0
2009 2010 Theatre Ice-rink
Other
6.75
6 Marketing Accomodations
Talent transport 40
40
Venue rent Other
Stage
Accomodations
transport
4 Crew
compensation Venue rent
Crew
20 compensation
Stage
2
construction Marketing Artist
compensation Artist
Talent transport
compensation
0.45
0 0
Theatre Ice-rink Theatre Ice-rink
Key Insight
Fixed costs per visit: Theatre format has very high xed cost base relative to Ice-rink. This suggests a need to
maximi e utili ation i.e., sell as many tickets as possible
Entertainment Co
80 $100K-150K 80 45-64
60 60
$50K-100K
25-44
40 40
$25K-50K
20 20
$25K 0-24
0 0
Theatre ticket buyers Ice-rink ticket buyers Theatre ticket buyers Ice-rink ticket buyers
Key Insights
1 of attendees by household income: Customers appear to have the same prole, which is not what the client
expected to happen when they introduced the new show format.
2 Share of population by age: In fact it seems a greater proportion of Ice-rink customers are older and slightly
wealthier.
Entertainment Co
Key Insights
1 City : Some markets may be able to sustain both formats without signicant cannibali ation. Therefore using both
formats in the market may make sense.
2 City : Some markets appear to be more susceptible to cannibali ation i.e. only 4K incremental Theatre tickets
would have exceeded the prot of the 20K Ice-rink tickets. ntertainment Co. should probably stick to only the Theatre
format.
3 City : Theatre format is not always protable. Remember that there are very high FC so if you cannot sell a large # of
tickets it might make sense to use the lower cost format.
Entertainment Co
Frame the Use framework to Dig deeper Develop insights Synthesise what Make a
problem guide analysis you learned recommendation
Key Insights
The root cause of the slower growth in protability is that as ntertainment Co. has grown they have not segmented
their markets and used the appropriate show format or length of stay
Theatre show has very high FC and therefore should only be taken to cities that can support a lot of shows and
sell a lot of tickets, otherwise Ice-rink format may be a better choice
Some markets can probably sustain both the Ice-rink and Theatre formats
Cannibali ation is a risk that must be mitigated. Ice-rink format should only perform in cities where it is very likely
to not impact Theatre sales
Entertainment Co
Frame the Use framework to Dig deeper Develop insights Synthesise what Make a
problem guide analysis you learned recommendation
Key Insights
Improve protability by segmenting markets
Large markets e.g., City A where cannibali ation is relatively low risk should be targeted for ot t atr and
t rin format
Medium markets e.g., City B should be limit d to onl t atr format to avoid cannibali ing the more
protable Theatre ticket sales
Small markets e.g., City C should be limit d to t rin format which can deliver greater prots than Theatre
Result will be higher penetration in large markets improved protability per ticket sold in the medium markets,
and greater prots at a lower risk due to lower cost base in the small markets
Entertainment Co
Entertainment Co
Frame the Use framework to Dig deeper Develop insights Synthesise what Make a
problem guide analysis you learned recommendation
Q: How would you Q: iven this Q: How can you Q: What insights can Q: How would you
frame the problem? framework, what dig deeper to nd you draw from the bring together
questions would you the source of the data you have? everything you have
A: Disaggregate ask your interviewer? problem? learned?
drivers and A: Some markets have
components of A: Drill into price and A: Dig in to price and much lower ticket A: Ice-rink show has
revenue and cost cost drivers over time cost drivers by market prices and attendance, shorter run lengths,
or by different market suggesting that they may be appropriate
Q: Do you have a may be inappropriate where Theatre cannot
hypothesis? for such a high cost sustain long runs and
product cover FC. But in cities
A: As ntertainment with long Theatre runs,
Co. has grown they Ice-rink format should
have started to be avoided
Fist pass
Bain & Company grants the London Business School permission, without charge, to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and or sell copies of the content in
the above Bain & Company practice case the Works subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice set forth at the bottom of each page and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Works.
BC
Iceberg PROFIT
Europe
Opening statement: Present the candidate with the slide Ask the candidate:
Our client is Iceberg, a major titled: UK ice cream tub prices and What strategies could Iceberg use
global branded ice cream producer. tell them: to address the performance issue in
Iceberg develops, manufactures and The Associate on this case prepared urope and how would you prioritise
markets ice cream products and this slide. What is causing the them?
sells to retailers who, in turn, sell to performance issue in urope?
the end consumer. Ice cream is one If the candidate is struggling, ask:
of the most protable products that How should Iceberg segment the Tests strategic thinking, creativity
Iceberg makes. The business has market and what is happening in each and ability to prioritise and provide
grown at 5% led by orth America segment? reasons
and developing markets. However,
Iceberg has recently seen poor
growth and competition intensifying Tests business intuition and What are your recommendations for
in the uropean ice cream market, in the ability to interpret data, Icebergs management?
particular from supermarkets own- draw conclusions and identify
brand ice cream. Iceberg management implications
are sure they have great products: Tests ability to synthesi e and
they continue to win in consumer taste structure recommendations,
tests, there is a strong pipeline of How does the market opportunity business intuition and empathy
planned product launches, and they compare to Icebergs business
have strong brands in many markets. today?
Management believes this allows them If the candidate is struggling,
to sell their products at a higher price ask: Which segment would you
than the competition. What could recommend Iceberg focus on and
be causing the performance issue in what is the margin and volume
urope? potential in that segment?
BC
Iceberg
Key case insights an excellent candidate might uncover for the interviewer only do not tell the candidate
There are 3 market segments: Iceberg is winning market share in In any given segment
economy, mass market and a shrinking mass market recommended: Icebergs volume,
premium-priced products margin or prot potential its
Premium segment is likely growing, competitiveness to customers
Iceberg competes primarily in the as brands distinguish themselves and consumers realising they are
mass market segment dened as from the mass market to retain and different and its ability to win
price points 2.00 3.99 , with a grow margins against branded and private label
38% market share by value 46m products
out of 122m , 34% by volume To compete, Iceberg should:
15m L out of 44m L Drive volume to improve plant
utilisation 35% in Western This case is long and candidates
urope, vs. 60% in orth would not necessarily be expected
If the candidate delineates 3 America and reduce unit to nish it
segments slightly differently, their costs, so that it is better able to
market si e and share numbers compete on price in the mass
would differ accordingly market
Increase presence in premium
relying on taste performance
Mass-market consumers are and strength of brand
becoming more price conscious Optimise drivers of consumer
sales of 2.00-2.59 are strongest purchasing behaviour besides
in the mass market category price e.g. packaging
advertising shelf placement
In the mass market and economy Potentially expand in the upper
segments, Tesco is undercutting end of the economy market,
Iceberg and other competitors although its retailer purchase
on price, growing the economy price may be less competitive
segment and pushing down
Icebergs revenue in the mass
market
2 London Business School Case Book
BC
Iceberg
7.00-7.99
6.00-6.99 Haagen Da s
Ben & errys
5.00-5.99 Tesco Finest
4.50-4.99
L
4.00-4.49
Retail price segment
3.50-3.99
3.00-3.49
1.50-1.99
1.00-1.49
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Market value of price segment at retail price 2012 m
1.0
0.18 0.89
0.8
0.11
0.10
L
0.6
Product cost
0.08 0.51
0.19
0.4
0.11
0.2
0.13
0.0
Ingredients Packaging Production Distribution Product Advertising Overhead Profit Retailer
cost & promos purchase
price
Source: Client data BC analysis
London Business School Case Book 3
BC
Iceberg
Exhibit: Iceberg global ice cream production plant utilisation show to candidate if this data is requested
Europe N America
100% 100%
80 80
Max Max
60 70% 60 70%
40 40
20 20
0 0
A B C D F HI K L A B C D F H I
Western urope C
Example of a possible case structure for review after the case interview
Product Pricing
Cost structure Competition
compare with compare with
Other branded ice creams Other branded ice creams Fixed costs Distribution channels
Own label ice creams Own label ice creams Variable costs Shelf positioning
Substitutes Substitutes
Promotions
other desserts other desserts
London Business School Case Book
BC
Iceberg
Differentiation between poor average and superior performance for review after the case interview
Identifying relevant Starts asking for a variety Asks a series of specic Denes information
information of information no clear questions related to a needed, including
logic single logical line identies rationale identies key
some key points from points and explains their
the graphs can process implications from the
answers and move on graphs presented
Running calculations Calculates incorrectly that Correctly calculates Realises lowering price
drawing conclusions from Iceberg cannot compete at Iceberg can compete at may dilute margins and
facts supermarket price points lower price points except suggests ways to avoid
Tesco Value and quanties identies production
margin utilisation issue and
proposes solution
Calculates volume
revenue prot potential
Identifying key implications Limited or eeds to be asked Identies the key case
and next steps illogical additional for ideas on potential insights drives to
demonstrates creativity recommendations solutions has a few ideas solutions on their own
on where to improve for how to improve prioritises a list of alternate
formulaic approach opportunities goes beyond
e.g. spend more on the obvious throughout the
marketing case process
London Business School Case Book
MARKET
Cupid s Arrow ENTR
Do not share any exhibits until Candidate is expected to continue Ask the candidate:
Part B with their case analysis. Share facts of So, what recommendations would
the case or exhibits see the following you make to Cupids Arrows
1 Structuring the case pages for details when these are management?
specically asked for by the candidate.
Our client is Cupids Arrow, a
successful subscription-based online When sharing an exhibit, ask the Tests ability to synthesi e and
dating agency. They currently operate candidate: structure their recommendations,
exclusively in the US market, where What does this exhibit tell us? How business intuition and empathy
they are the market leader. Cupids might this affect Cupids Arrows entry
Arrow are considering entering the into the UK market?
UK online dating market. What are
the main factors that they should
consider? Tests business intuition and
the ability to interpret data,
draw conclusions and identify
Tests ability to structure, implications
hypothesise and think creatively
around a problem
2 Market si e estimation
BC
Cupid s Arrow
Key case insights an excellent candidate might uncover for the interviewer only do not tell the candidate
The UK market will nearly double The UK soul mates segment ntry into the UK market could be
in si e over the next 2 years and is may already be quite via organic growth or syndicated
quite fragmented with at least a few competitive: HappyHearts 33% from the existing US Cupids Arrow
new entrants share and 20% p.a. growth and site, but would be fastest via
Lovebirds 23% share together acquisition and rebranding of a
Prot margin is healthy at 75% per have 75% share and the soul smaller site, for instant network
customer 180 p.a. per customer mates segment is only 25% of effects between subscribers. iven
the UK market the anticipated pace of growth in
Cupids Arrow may struggle in UK may increasingly shift the UK market and the likely lock-in
entering the UK market candidate towards soul mates, like the effect in this market based on the
may take a slightly different view US as online dating loses its si e of a subscriber base,
of the future direction of the UK stigma, but it is not there yet acquisition and rebranding of a
market and optimal strategy, but is smaller site would be advisable
expected to support their position Overall, the UK market is attractive,
with similar insights : but may require Cupids Arrow to
There is greater stigma around adapt its image focus in the UK This case is long and candidates
online dating in the UK 65% more towards the interests of UK would not necessarily be expected
than in the US 35% , although customers socialising casual to nish it
this is declining over time dating and to form a clear strategy
Cupids Arrows core strength to compete against the aggressive
in the soul mates segment in growth of HappyHearts and the
the US 60% of the US market , threat of new entrants
is less applicable in the UK
where this segment comprises Along with a clear strategy,
only 25% of the market aggressive marketing campaigns
socialising and casual dating and friend referral benet schemes,
segments comprise 75% of etc. are key to establishing a
the market presence in the UK market
Facts to share with the candidate if asked for specically for the interviewer only
Cupids Arrow currently has US Set-up costs for Cupids Arrow Exhibit: Running costs for a
revenues of USD$30m per year in the UK for organic growth typical K online dating agency
are minimal e.g. IT equipment, ar if a da o t o t
Cupids Arrow currently focuses on customer survey ro ta ilit
nding soul mates life partners
for its subscribers in the US HappyHearts growth is due to Exhibit: S vs K perceptions
aggressive marketing campaigns of online dating ar if a d
xpected revenue for Cupids and friend referral benet schemes a o t mar t m ntation
Arrow in the UK is 20 per month d mo ra i diff r n t of
per customer Exhibit: Historic and pro ected onlin datin it in t r
growth of the K online dating t
market ar onl in art of
t a aft r t mar t i in
if a d a o t mar t ro t or
om tition
London Business School Case Book
BC
Cupid s Arrow
Exhibit: Historic and pro ected growth of the K online dating market
show to candidate if this data is requested
300 CA R
12 1 278
Other 20 players 2m
36
250 Table4Two
TakeAChance
CA R 204
200 TakeMeOut
9 12
m
19 MatchMeUp
UK revenue
Exhibit: Running costs for a typical K online dating agency Show to candidate if this data is requested
60
5
50
15
per customer year
40
30 60
20 40
10
0
Marketing IT support Admin support Total costs per customer
London Business School Case Book
BC
Cupid s Arrow
Question 1: Do you believe there is a stigma Question 2: hat are you looking for from an
around online dating online dating agency
50 50 60 60
40 50
40
% respondents
% respondents
40 40
30 35
25 25 30
20 20 25 25
15 20
15
10 10
10
5
0 0
US UK US UK
Source: Survey of a random sample 20-45 year olds from the US and UK n 100 in each country
Example of a possible case structure for review after the case interview
Main factors affecting the attractiveness of the K online dating market for Cupid s Arrow
Protability Acquisition
London Business School Case Book 9
BC
Cupid s Arrow
Example calculation for the si e of the K market For review after the case interview
Drivers Assumptions
UK population 60m
Number of K
% of target range that
customers 33%
are single
0.5m
% of single potentials
Subscription revenue: that are interested in 25%
Total si e of the K internet dating
market year
120m % willing to pay for a
20%
subscription service
BC
Cupid s Arrow
Examples of creative ideas to maximise success in the K for review after the case interview
Candidate may take different views of optimal strategy not all of these will apply
The K has a stigma around online dating compared Adapt marketing to integrate with the K market
to the S market Be less overt about nding The One
mphasise socialising and meeting new people
Supplement UK sites with in-person social events
K customers are looking for a different type of online Rebrand in the K towards a more social focus
service socialising casual dating less geared Appropriate branding to attract a wider pool of singles
towards nding a life partner Modify the website to emphasise meeting friends
casual dates as well as partners
Offer regular managed events to get single people
together in a fun setting e.g. ice skating, bowling
Although K market is today focussed on Expand existing S site directly into the K with
socialising casual dating with rapid K market strong branding to reduce online dating stigma
growth online dating is expected to rapidly lose Maintain focus on nding life partners
its stigma and customers will increasingly seek life Aggressive, wide marketing base showing real
partners online as has been the case in the S members and matches to emphasise that everybodys
using it
xpect potentially slow growth until stigma reduces
London Business School Case Book 61
BC
Cupid s Arrow
Differentiation between poor average and superior performance for review after the case interview
Making a market si e Struggles to identify the Makes a clear structure Makes a clear structure for
estimate main drivers of the market. for estimation, makes estimation and completes
Does not have a rough no very few errors with analysis with condence
idea of UK population. numerical steps and enthusiasm.
Struggles to provide Makes insightful
rationale for estimates. commentary around
Makes basic numerical estimate assumptions.
errors Acknowledges potential
other revenue sources.
Interpretation of graphical eeds signicant Correctly interprets main Identies all main trends
gures identifying key info prompting to understand competitor trends from plus more subtle features
output. Draws only basic graph, is able to calculate of graphical outputs,
conclusions from the data prot margin, understands asks probing questions
little insight some of the survey ndings e.g. Do we know what is
with little prompting driving the doubling of the
market si e? and suggests
hypotheses synthesi es
clearly between the market
and survey exhibits
Synthesi ing key Poor recollection of main Can correctly draw Summary is a well
ndings and making ndings laundry list together key ndings with synthesi ed and structured
recommendations recall with little synthesis reasonable synthesis of view that incorporates
demonstrating creativity insight. Unable to ideas needs prompting all the main ndings.
provide creative ideas for to come up with creative Drives independently to
success in the market e.g. ideas for Cupids Arrow to the need for a change
suggests just offering a be successful in strategy for entry into
low subscription price the UK, gives a clear
strategy recommendation
and rationale and makes
creative suggestions
62 London Business School Case Book
Europe
Case Question
Our client is a budget airline considering entering a new market for business class ights. They are considering running an
all business-class service within urope. They want your advice on whether this is a good idea, and if so, how they should
do it.
Intro Facts tell the candidate if asked Key Insights do not tell the candidate
Q: What is the clients current business Issues exist around the brand of a low cost airline,
A: A range of cheap short haul ights from the UK to various meaning the rebranding might be necessary
uropean destinations
Landing slots at hub airports are critical to business
Q: Do they offer any business class ights at the moment? travel, and will be very hard to acquire
A: o, but passengers can pay for various upgrades such
as speedy boarding and greater legroom They do not have the full set of capabilities required to
deliver a business class service, so choice of partners
Q: How is their current brand perceived? will be critical
A: xtremely cheap, but very low quality service
Case at a glance
Structure the case and discuss the Identify some innovative service Work out the cost to break even on a
challenges that will be involved in offerings for the luxury tourism market ight to Vienna
entering this market
Business Travellers Incumbent Airlines xisting slots at airports Set up new subsidiary
Structure xamples of typical questions that the interviewer could ask around each of the four areas
Customers Competition
Will their budget brand be a limitation or an asset? Can this simply be launched as another route with a
What capabilities do they have as a budget airline that different service?
are particularly useful? Whom could they partner with?
What do they not currently do that they will need to be Is an acquisition or partnership a viable option?
good at? Should they consider setting up a new company?
Do they have access to landing slots?
Creativity Here are some ideas for innovative services in this market
Basic Ideas More Innovative Ideas
1 Fly a scheduled service to high end holiday resorts 1 Charter to luxury cruise lines to offer passengers ights
2 Partner with luxury hotel chains and travel companies to to the ship
offer packages 2 Do not y scheduled ights, but focus on one off ights
3 Fly from regional airports and include a chauffeur to get to key uropean social events Monaco rand Prix,
passengers there Paris Fashion Week, LBS winning MBAT
3 Offer packages including entry to these events
4 Run on board events, such as wine tastings
5 Offer experience ights e.g. over the orth Pole
6 London Business School Case Book
Calculation Our rst destination will be Vienna. How much would we have to charge to break even with
25 32 seats lled?
What are the main cost items that you would expect an airline such as this to face?
Costs
Airport charges
Fuel Aircraft dry lease Aircraft servicing Aircrew costs Other overheads Landing, passenger Catering costs
use of facilities
2 pilots 700 ph
6000kg 0.5 Kg 2500 ight 600 ight 1500 ight 900 ight 1400 ight
3 crew 400 ph
The gures in each cost item can be given to the interviewee, although they should expect to make a reasoned
estimate where possible
Any cost items the interviewee does not identify should be given to them
The interviewee should then work through to the answer below
Differentiation between poor average and superior performance for review after the case interview
Identifying relevant Struggles to identify what Identies a number of the Identies a number of
information the cost categories are, major cost categories, can the cost categories,
does not ask the right make reasonable rule of understands what drives
questions to get there thumb estimations them and can make
estimations
Running calculations Struggles with arithmetic, Reaches an answer and Reaches an answer
drawing conclusions from unable to work out a break shows the ability to sense easily and demonstrates
facts even gure check their numbers structure in their approach
Identifying key implications Thinks of only basic ideas Comes up with 3-4 ideas Comes up with a wide
and next steps for the airline service, for the airline service which range of ideas, including
demonstrates creativity probably things that are are at least sensible innovative ones that may
being done already not have been heard before
66 London Business School Case Book
Europe
eography of the case
Case Question
Our client is a packaging coating company that produces coatings to protect beverage cans. They are experiencing a prot
margin erosion and would like you to help them restore protability without modifying their cost structure.
Intro Facts tell the candidate if asked Key Insights do not tell the candidate
Q: Where and what is the company producing? Without touching at the cost structure, volume, price &
A: They provide uropean llers with coating for the inside product mix are the key levers to improve margins.
of beverage cans.
The most effective margin lever is price, hence we shall
Q: What explains the margin erosion & is competition facing focus on improving the pricing strategy.
the same challenge?
A: The reason is macroeconomic: a slow economic recovery
since the nancial crisis & a raw material volatility have been
affecting the entire market.
Case at a glance
et s review the main pricing Identify some innovative service et s estimate the price increase
strategies to x prices et s look at a value based pricing that could be reali ed thanks to a
Discuss the main 3 pricing strategies: approach for their product: what value based pricing approach on
cost-based value-based competitive- could be the benets that customer their product
based pricing strategies. are looking for Based on the following 3 benets -
Imagine potential customer benets Technical Assistance Coating Waste
from product features & services Reduction & Scratch Resistance - lets
offerings. assess the potential price impact
total gain, gain per Kg and % price
increase .
London Business School Case Book 6
Example of Structure
Increase Average Selling Price of existing products Increase Market Share at existing customers
lasticity more often, more per command, for longer, etc.
Improve Product Mix by selling more high margin products Reach out to new customers
Positioning within the existing area or in new regions
Structure How do you set price and what are the main pricing strategies?
Value Benets Driven Raw Material Cost Driven Market Competitor Driven
Base prices on product and service Base prices on raw materials volatility Base prices on competitor prices,
benets to be shared between the to reduce margin exposure supply-curve, and supply demand
customer and the supplier balances
Works better if product or service Works better if raw materials are Works better if competitor prices
benets are explicable to the increasing and are expected to are known and collecting them is
customers ideally quantiable continue to do so legal
Works better if customer knows Works better if price negotiation Works better if price elasticity is
the next best alternative prices period is shorter than the calculable
and features purchasing period
6 London Business School Case Book
Creativity Lets now focus on value-based pricing: what could be the customer benets of a coating product
for the inside of cans of soda?
Below Average: Average Above Average
Thinks about a couple of product Suggests: Same as before plus a couple of the
features but does not manage to Reduce down time to increase following:
translate them into benets for the productivity Protect brand image scratches,
customers Reduce product usage taste, customer claim
Reduce labour cost Provide local support
xtend product life expectancy
Full legislation compliance
Shift ordering responsibility to the
supplier
Quantitative analytics What is the potential price increase to be reali ed thanks to a value-based pricing
strategy on a coating product for soda cans?
Q: What is the price and volume sold of our product?
A: We sold Tons of A a oat at 2 2 Kg to our only client
268,000 Total
1 3 Total 268,000- 2.25-2.00 500,000
0.54 Kg
Potential Price Increase: 29 Kg 0.54-0.25 : 2 2.79 2.25
London Business School Case Book 69
Differentiation between poor average and superior performance for review after the case interview
Running calculations
drawing conclusions from o clue on how to Mixes units or makes a Perfect ow to come
facts assess the premium calculation error once up with the numerical
generated by each Finds the potential solution & proactive
benets nancial gain of each about assumptions
Forgets to include the benets but does Puts outcome in
price difference vs. not put ndings in perspective: 24%
the competition in nal perspective and does Mentions next steps:
outcome not do the So What? Difculty to pass it all
Mixes units day vs. to the customer
year or tons vs. Kg
Multiple calculation
errors
nited Kingdom
Case Question
Our client is a mobile network operator in the UK. It has recently been suffering from high costs driven by increasing data
usage, and this has led to a fall in prot. They want to explore options for increasing their revenue
Intro Facts tell the candidate if asked Key Insights do not tell the candidate
Q: Is it just data usage driving costs? The market for mobile network operators is becoming
A: Yes. rowth in data usage leads to the need for constant commoditised there is little to distinguish between
investment in the network infrastructure and higher running networks and customers switch easily if prices are
costs too high
Q: Are we interested in reducing costs? The money in mobile internet is made by those who
A: Of course, but its out of our scope control the content, not the ow of data
Case at a glance
What are the drivers of revenue for Beyond the commodity business of A quantitative assessment of whether
a mobile network operator and what transmitting data, in what other ways it would be better to charge customers
improvement levers do we have? could a network operator generate per Mb of data used rather than a xed
revenue from the growth in the mobile fee, and a qualitative view on whether
internet? it is a good idea or not.
Structure A particularly good structure for this case is one that really understands the breakdown of
quantity and price
Quantity Price
Number of Devices Increase market share by winning customers from other networks
How? If those customers also consume a lot of data, what will the impact
on costs be?
Create new devices that people may sign up to in addition to their existing
ones
What sort of device? How will we charge for the data on it?
sage Drive increased usage of those services where we are able to charge on a
per-usage basis
Would we have to lower price to do that? Are there ways we could
increase the value-add of our services?
Conversely we could try to discourage data usage if it is charged on a at fee
basis, to reduce costs rather than increase revenue
How? Introduce limits?
Creativity Transmitting data is becoming commoditised. How else might the network generate revenue from
mobile internet?
Charge for hosting Can provide customers with a easy May be difcult to persuade content
content i e a web portal way of nding suitable content owners to provide content if they can
where content owners Could be a distinguishing feature for offer it for free elsewhere
pay for their content to be the network, e.g. Apple Apps Store
included
Other services e g credit Creates a new revenue stream for the Requires close involvement of device
card readers stolen car networks manufacturers and access to new
trackers etc markets
A strong candidate will identify a number of ways of monetising content and creating further forms of usage,
understand the positives and negatives of each and form a view on what the network has the capabilities to actually
do. They may get to this stage without prompting
An average candidate will identify some additional ways of generating revenue and understand which are more
suitable than others
A poor candidate will identify one or two additional options, but recommend those that are not likely to be suitable
for a network operator to do
London Business School Case Book 3
Calculation How much additional revenue could we generate if we charged users 0.05 per Mb rather than
5 monthly xed fee? Would you recommend doing this?
Proposed Pricing
Current Pricing
London Business School Case Book
Differentiation between poor average and superior performance for review after the case interview
Identifying relevant Does not understand that As a minimum identies Would identify what is
information the xed fee for data is the that charging for data with driving data usage, and
problem, and focusses on a xed fee is the problem, then begin to discuss other
other factors instead and suggests alternatives ways of generating revenue
from this
Running calculations Fails to account for the The right answer as a An understanding of
drawing conclusions from current revenues, or a minimum, structured by whether this is a good
facts simple average of data use each usage segment idea based on more than
across all customers a comparison of numbers,
showing good commercial
sense
Identifying key implications Thinks in terms of pricing One or two good ideas As per an average
and next steps models only, fails to around monetising content, candidate, but would show
demonstrates creativity understand where the and understanding of the a real understanding of
money is in mobile internet, pros and cons of each where money is being
suggests things that will made in mobile internet
also drive up costs and what the network has
the capabilities to do
London Business School Case Book
E K Consulting
NewCo Petrol Retailer INVESTMENT
Case Background
You are an entrepreneur on an island However, you do not have any She asks you to estimate what capital
of 50 million people. You feel that there meaningful capital and are going to you are likely to need in the business.
is an opportunity to invest in petrol need to raise the investment required
retailing there are already 1,000 petrol so you visit your local banker.
stations on the island .
If prompted, the interviewer will clarify that no additional information is available to answer the question.
You have not been given much The approach set out below starts together with a reasonable assumption
information with which to form a by determining the potential sales of for the required rate of return on
view of the si e of the investment the new petrol outlet, which in turn capital, the amount of capital required
required. Before starting to answer the depends on the total market si e from the bank can be calculated.
question, it is worth taking a minute and expected market share. The
to think through a logical framework economics of the business are then
to structure your response, and to mapped out to develop an estimate
explain the intended approach to the of the protability of the business.
interviewer at the outset. Using this estimate of its protability,
A strong candidate would receive no further guidance. Where necessary, candidates would be prompted to address
each of the following areas in turn to arrive at an estimate of the capital requirement.
6 London Business School Case Book
E K Consulting
Example calculation:
20m households on the island assuming 2.5 people on average per household
Ancillary revenue of 80
- c. 40 refuels per annum assuming average refuel si e of c.45 litres per visit
- average ancillary spend per visit of 2
E K Consulting
Question 3: hat are the economics of the business likely to look like
Having already estimated the revenue
for the site, there are two possible Example calculation:
approaches here. One would be
to identify the various elements of Typical operating margin 5%
xed and variable costs and develop
estimates for each of these. The BIT 500k 10m x 5%
second simpler approach is to
consider typical operating margins
for retail businesses, and assume this
business would perform in line.
Marakon
Air et Inc PROFIT
North America
Air et Inc. is a U.S. manufacturer volume increase year-over-year Air ets senior management team
of small, regional airplanes. It of 10% and 5%, respectively, and has hired a team of consultants to
manufactures two types of aircraft: revenues of $794 million and $225 help the company develop a value-
et engine 80 to100-seat and million, respectively maximi ing strategy. We need your
propeller aircraft 20 to 30-seat help to understand
Although overall Air et turned What are the key issues and
In 2011, Air et delivered 110 jet a prot, protability varied opportunities at Air et?
engine aircraft and 150 propeller signicantly by business What solutions would you
aircraft. This represented a unit recommend to management?
ncourage candidate to develop an approach to root cause the protability issue. Provide the following information
either in full or as requested by the candidate
ote conomic prot includes a charge that accounts for the required return on capital. When P 0 value is created,
when P 0 value is destroyed even if et Income is positive ,and at P 0 the business generates exactly the
required return
London Business School Case Book 9
Marakon
Air et Inc
Using a typical protability framework, the candidate should make the following observations
The et ngine business is The problem lies with the et et engine parts are complex and
unprotable while the propeller ngine business typically bought from speciali ed
business is highly protable O Ms
ross margins in the et ngine Additional information
business are much lower than the Costs and hence margins are in
Propeller business line with market average
The candidate should focus the rest of the discussion on the et ngines business and understanding market si e,
growth and protability within the segment. Provide the following information in full or as requested
Market Structure
500
deliveries
400 Competitor 4: 11 CA R
36 deliveries Competitor 4 6
Competitor 3:
# of Deliveries
Marakon
Air et Inc
Key insights
1 The market is protable and growing with the average ood andidat o ld to lor t mar t ro t
competitor generating 5% economic prot margins Additional information for di ion
Total Revenues $3520 mn
Revenue per aircraft $3520 440 $8mn The market is expected to continue growing at 7% for the
Cost per Aircraft $6.8m 10 % of $3300mn Capital next 10 years due to:
$7.6mn a Changes in regulation e.g. Open Skies and
conomic Prot per aircraft $8 mn - $7.6 mn $0.4 globali ation India, China have lifted restrictions on
mn U.S. based airlines to service these segments
P Margin 0.4 8 5% b The current customer base for Air et is largely US based
2 Air et has the largest market share at 25% was 20% 3 c Success of newer businesses such as Fractional et
years back Programs time sharing of jets
3 Air et growing at 15%, market growing at 7% d xpected replacement cycles as older jets are retired
4 Four other competitors control the remaining market
ranging from 16-22%
5 There is no dominant competitor in the jet engine
business
Competitive Position
Once the candidate identies that Air et has gained market share over the last 3 years, he she should explore the
reasons for it. Information for supporting this discussion
1 Air et is pricing its product lower than the market on b rforman Range of 500 miles which is similar to
average. They can increase price by 20% and still have the market average
a competitive product which provides a fair benet to c aint nan and A t if The majority of
customers the fragmented jet engine aircraft maintenance
companies have the capabilities and parts to service
2 There doesnt seem to be much differentiation versus Air ets aircraft
products from competitors 3 Therefore, just increasing the price by 20% will put Air et
a o it: Similar to industry standard, resulting in low in midst of the cluster. Without any offer advantage, Air et
switching costs for new customers will lose market share relative to its current position
Air et s Customers
Once the candidate identies pricing disadvantage as the issue, direct the conversation to lead to customer
segmentation at the root of the issue. Provide the candidate with the following information
Marakon
Air et Inc
The main driver of protability The Lessor segment makes Lessors comprise the largest
between segments is solely large purchases and exploits a customer segment more than 50%
price without doing any math, negotiating leverage over Air et of the total market by volume
since operating cost per aircraft Segment 1: 80 planes, our
produced and delivered is the Average revenue per customer is: share 12.5%
same regardless of the intended $390M 60 aircraft $6.5M per Segment 2: 120 planes, our
customer aircraft from Lessors, compared to share 33%
$8.4M from Af uent Individuals and Segment 3: 240 planes, our
$8.0M from Corporate Customers share 25%
Prompt the candidate to develop alternatives for solving the protability issues. Some suggestions based on
participation choices
1 Increase prices for Lessors: for 2 xit the Lessors segment: Similar 3 nter the leasing business:
every $500K we lose 1 customer calculations show that the loss Forward integration. Also creates a
15 aircraft . After a few calculations of scale makes the other two threat for the Lessor customer and
the candidate should see that segments unprotable as well improve negotiating leverage
with such elasticity this alternative cannot cover xed costs
cannot be protable, e.g. 4 Other
a Increase in Price to mn
losing 1 customer
b Total Aircrafts sold
10 40 45 95
c Total Aircrafts Cost
165 95 x 6 $735
d Total Revenue
84 320 7 x 45 $719
e Prot Loss $16 mn remains
unprotable at $7.5m and $8m
i.e. losing 2 or 3 customers
2 London Business School Case Book
Marakon
Air et Inc
Discuss with the candidate possible pros and cons of each alternative. Specically for Alternative 3 enter the leasing
business the following information should indicate that it is a good opportunity that can help prop-up the Lessor
segment as well
Market rowth: The jet engine, Market Economics: Customer: Air et has marketing
regional aircraft leasing market is i The aircraft leasing market relationships with all aircraft end-
large and growing. In 2011, the new is protable with the average users who are leasing their aircraft
aircraft leasing market represented competitor generating RO s of from the companys aircraft lessor
almost 50% of all new aircraft 15% cost of equity 10% customers. Air et works with these
delivered with operating leases ii The key driver of protability is end-users to help them congure
comprising half and is expected to cost of funds. Air et would be the plane during the front end of
grow 5% per year at parity the sales process
If time permits and the candidate has reached a satisfying solution for the protability issue, use the rest of the time to
brainstorm additional growth alternatives for the business. The following is a starter list
Europe
Case Background
This document is intended to help that the following case is a good The example below is set up to teach
prepare you for the case portion of a example of the type of case many of you how to approach a typical case.
McKinsey & Company interview. While our interviewers use. However, in most
interviewers at McKinsey have a good interviews the interviewer will only ask
deal of exibility in creating the cases a selection of the questions in this
they use in an interview, we believe case.
Context
The interviewer will typically start the case by giving a brief overview of the context, ending with a question that is the
problem denition. At the end of the description you will have an opportunity to ask any questions you might have to
clarify the information that has been provided to you.
Lets assume our client is ld arma Biological R&D is vastly different Should OldPharma acquire
a major pharmaceutical company from small molecule R&D. To gain BioFuture
pharmaco with USD 10 billion these capabilities, pharmacos can
a year in revenues. Its corporate build them from scratch, partner with
headquarters and primary research existing startups, or acquire them. Write down important
and development R&D centers are in Since its competitors are already information
ermany, with regional sales ofces several years ahead of ld arma
worldwide. ld arma wants to jumpstart its Feel free to ask interviewer for
biologicals program by acquiring explanation of any point that is
ld arma has a long, successful BioFuture, a leading biologicals start- not clear to you
tradition in researching, developing, up based in the San Francisco area.
and selling small molecule drugs. BioFuture was founded 12 years ago
This class of drugs represents the by several prominent scientists and
vast majority of drugs today, including now employs 200 people. It is publicly
aspirin and most blood-pressure or traded and at its current share price
cholesterol medications. ld arma the company is worth about USD 1
is interested in entering a new, rapidly billion in total.
growing segment of drugs called
biologicals . These are often proteins ld arma has engaged McKinsey
or other large, complex molecules that to evaluate the BioFuture acquisition
can treat conditions not addressable and advise on its strategic t with
by traditional drugs. ld arma biologicals strategy.
London Business School Case Book
OldPharma
Questions
In McKinsey & Company case interviews, the interviewer will guide you through the case with a series of questions that
will allow you to display a full range of problem solving skills. Below is a series of questions and potential answers that
will give you an idea of what a typical case discussion might be like.
Question 1
What factors should the team consider when evaluating whether ld arma should acquire BioFuture?
Take time to organi e your thoughts before answering. This tells the interviewer that you think about the problem in a
logical way
A good answer would include the BioFuture s marketing or sales OldPharmas capability gaps
following: capabilities specially how in biologicals R&D, sales and
Value of BioFuture s drug pipeline promotional messages will be marketing, etc.
umber of drugs currently in delivered, e.g., relationships with key
development. uality of drugs opinion leaders that can promote OldPharmas alternatives to this
likelihood of success . Potential biologicals Key opinion leaders can acquisition Alternative companies
revenues and prots come from the academic arena, like ld arma could acquire. Other
prominent medical school professors, strategies for entering biological
Biofuture s R&D capabilities future or from the public arena, like heads segment, e.g., enter partnerships
drug pipeline Scientic talent. of regulatory bodies or prominent rather than acquisition. Pursuing other
Intellectual property e.g., patents, telejournalists strategies than entering the biological
proprietary processes or know-how segment.
for biologicals research . Buildings, Acquisition price
equipment and other items that allow
Biofutures R&D to operate A very good answer might also
include multiple additional key
factors OldPharma should consider
For example:
BioFuture s existing partnerships or
other relationships with pharmacos
London Business School Case Book
OldPharma
Question 2
The team wants to explore BioFutures current drug pipeline. The team decides to focus rst on evaluating the value of
BioFutures drug pipeline both its current portfolio, as well as its ability to generate drugs on an ongoing basis. What
issues should the team consider when evaluating the value of BioFutures existing drug pipeline?
nsure to mention different issues instead of immediately diving very deep into one issue. Then ask your interviewer if
he she wants to go deeper on any of them.
A good answer would include the Costs to manufacture and sell, e.g., Side effects and potential legal
following: marketing, distribution, etc. exposure, e.g., potential law suits
Further cost of R&D until each drug due to unexpected side effects
is ready to be sold Press about these drugs, e.g., have
famous doctors called for this kind mergence of substitutes are
Potential value of selling each drug of drug, is it only slightly improving competitors working on substitutes
Market si e, e.g., si e of patient on what is on the market already? already? Is it about speed and
population, pricing does BioFuture have enough
researchers working on the
Market share, e.g., number of A very good answer would also respective drugs?
competitive drugs in R&D or on include the following:
the market different side effects, Risk level Strength of underlying patents, i.e.,
convenient dosing schedule i.e., Likelihood clinical trials of a drug how likely is it that a competitor
patients are prescribed to take a will prove effective can successfully copy BioFutures
drug at regular intervals that are drug?
easy to remember such as once a Likelihood drug will win regulatory
day or every 12 hours , etc. approval
Question 3
Below is a description of expected probability of success, by stage, in the Pharma R&D pipeline.
ote: Filing is the process of submitting all of the clinical and safety evidence from Phase I, II, and III trials, and asking
for regulatory approval to actually sell the drug.
OldPharma
ld arma believes that the likelihood of success of BioFutures primary drug candidate can be improved by investing an
additional USD 150 million in a larger Phase II trial. The hope is that this investment would raise the success rate in Phase II,
meaning that more candidate drugs successfully make it to Phase III and beyond. By how much would the Phase II success
rate need to increase in order for this investment to breakeven?
The interviewer would tell you to assume that if the drug is successfully marketed and sold, it would be worth USD 1.2
billion i.e., the present value of all future prots from selling the drug is USD 1.2 billion .
A very good answer would include To breakeven, i.e. to make the Phase II probability would have to
the following: $150 million investment worth increase from 40% to 80%
Investment would need to increase while, value of the candidate 70% x 80% 56%
probability of success in Phase II drug that passes Phase II would
from 40% to 80% increase of 40 need to increase to $540 million This seems like a very big
percentage points . There are multiple $150 million $690 million. This challenge as an increase by 40
ways to approach this calculation. One means, the probability of combined percentage points means that the
method is shown here: success in Phase I and II would current probability of 40% needs
If a candidate drug passes Phase need to increase by 150 540 28 to double
II, then it has a 50% x 90% 45% percentage points
chance of being successfully
marketed and sold. Since a So the current probability of
successful candidate drug is worth Phase I and II, i.e., 70% x 40%
$1.2 billion, a candidate drug that 28% would have to increase
passes Phase II is worth 45% x by 28 percentage points, i.e., to
$1.2 billion $540 million 56%. In order to come up to 56%,
Question
ext, the team explores the potential setup with BioFuture after the acquisition. Although BioFutures existing drug pipeline
is relatively limited, ld arma is highly interested in its ability to serve as a biological research engine that, when
combined with ld arma existing R&D assets, will produce many candidate drugs over the next 10 years. What are your
hypotheses on the major risks of integrating the R&D functions of BioFuture and ld arma
A very good answer would include Language barriers severely hinder Key scientic talent leaving
the following: communication and sharing of BioFuture after the acquisition
Scientists do not have overlapping information either because acquisition makes
disease therapeutic area interests them independently wealthy or
or expertise and are unable to Poor management and sense of because they dont want to be a
materially collaborate community as a result of R&D part of the new big ld arma
operations that might come with a pharmaco
Integration into the process- time difference of 9 hours
driven ld arma culture kills the
entrepreneurial culture at BioFuture
that has been key to its success
London Business School Case Book
OldPharma
Question
Post-acquisition, ld arma believes that it will be necessary to consolidate all biologicals R&D into one center. There are
two logical choices: ld arma existing headquarters in ermany, and Biofutures current headquarters in San Francisco.
ld arma does not have any current biologicals facilities or operations in ermany, so new facilities would have to be built.
How would you think about this decision?
A very good answer would include Overall easier to integrate asier to retain the entrepreneurial
the following: BioFutures R&D capabilities into spirit and culture of BioFuture
Reasons for consolidating at ld arma
OldPharmas corporate HQ in o need to rebuild e.g.
ermany Reasons for consolidating in manufacturing plants, research
Better coordination with non- BioFuture s San Francisco location facilities
biologicals R&D at ld arma Less likely to see ight of talent:
many top scientists would likely
Better coordination with other leave rather than relocate to
business units of ld arma e.g., ermany
marketing, manufacturing
asier to recruit and nd top
asier to intermix scientists in research talent in San Francisco
biologicals and traditional R&D vs ermany
units, and transfer any unique
capabilities & knowledge
Question 6
While researching the integration barriers, the team learns that one of ld armas top competitors, DrugMax, has already
partnered with BioFuture on their lead drug candidate essentially agreeing to split all development costs and future prots
50 50. ld arma is considering buying out DrugMaxs 50% share of the BioFuture lead drug candidate. As a rst step in
valuation, they have asked the McKinsey team to estimate the potential peak sales of this drug candidate this is another
way to verify potential future prots of a drug. The drug candidate is intended to treat non-Hodgkins lymphoma. ew cases
are diagnosed each year in 25 out of every 100,000 U.S. men and 15 out of every 100,000 U.S. women. iven this and any
other information you might need, what are the estimated U.S. peak sales of this compound?
The following information will be given to you by the interviewer upon request:
U.S. population is 300 million, half men, half women.
Full course of therapy takes 90 days and ld arma believes the drug can be sold at a price of $500 per day.
stimated market share i.e., % of eligible patients who are treated with this drug , is 25%.
A very good answer would include ach course of therapy will yield
the following: $45,000 in revenue 90 days at
xpected peak sales of this drug $500 per day . Therefore total U.S.
candidate are USD $675 million market potential is $2.7 billion.
stimated market capture is 25%,
Assuming a U.S. population of 150 leading to an estimated U.S. peak
million men and 150 million women, sales of $675 million.
there would be 37,500 estimated
diagnoses among men, and
22,500 diagnoses among women,
or 60,000 new cases of non-
Hodgkins lymphoma per year
London Business School Case Book
OldPharma
Question
On the third day of the engagement you run into the Vice President of Business Development for ld arma in the cafeteria.
He asks what the teams current perspective is on the BioFuture acquisition and what next steps you are planning to take.
How would you respond?
There is no right or wrong answer on in Phase II trials is not likely to be a ld arma. There are signicant risks
whether to buy or not buy and there protable investment secondly, one of to this as well, given the two worlds
are various ways on how to build an your competitors, DrugMax, currently nature of their organi ational cultures.
argumentation One possible very has a cooperation with BioFuture for
good answer would be: its lead drug candidate. This needs to As next steps we therefore want to
An acquisition of BioFuture can be taken into account when trying to better understand the feasibility of
bring two major sources of value to acquire BioFuture. We are still looking bridging the cultural gap and better
ld arma: the value of its existing into other potential synergies, but it understand pros and cons of different
compounds and the potential value of appears unlikely that ld arma can consolidation options estimate the
integrating its research capabilities into justify the cost of an acquisition purely cost of this research integration get
ld arma based on BioFutures existing pipeline a better understanding of the value of
BioFutures future potential to develop
In terms of BioFutures existing pipeline The greater source of upside is likely to drugs
there are a couple of challenges: rstly, be the long-term benets of integrating
the proposed idea of investing heavily BioFutures research capabilities with
London Business School Case Book 9
NE
RefreshNow Soda PROD CT
A NCH
North America
Case Background
This document is intended to help believe that the following case is a good The example below is set up to teach
prepare you for the case portion of example of the type of case many of you how to approach a typical case.
a McKinsey & Company interview. our interviewers use. However, in most
While interviewers at McKinsey have interviews the interviewer will only ask a
a good deal of exibility in creating selection of the questions in this case.
the cases they use in an interview, we
Context
The interviewer will typically start the case by giving a brief overview of the context, ending with a question that is the
problem denition. At the end of the description you will have an opportunity to ask any questions you might have to
clarify the information that has been provided to you.
RefreshNow Soda
Questions
In McKinsey & Company case interviews, the interviewer will guide you through the case with a series of questions that
will allow you to display a full range of problem solving skills. Below is a series of questions and potential answers that
will give you an idea of what a typical case discussion might be like.
Question 1
What key factors should fr o consider in deciding whether or not to launch at ra?
Take time to organi e your thoughts before answering. This tells the interviewer that you think about the problem in
a logical way
A good answer would include the Competitors Which products is packaging, or distribution? Is it
following: at ra going to compete with? possible to accommodate at ra
Consumers Who drinks avored Which companies are key players and in the current production and
water? Are there specic market how will they react? distribution facilities? What impact
segments to address? does geography have on the plant
A very good answer might also selection?
Cost Price Is the avored bottled include multiple additional key
water market more protable than factors RefreshNow! should Channels What is the ideal
those markets for fr o s consider For example: distribution channel for this product?
current products? Is it possible to Capabilities and Capacity Are current retail outlets willing to add
protably sell price set by the market, Are the required marketing and at ra to their product catalogue?
internal production costs at ra? sales capabilities available within
iven xed costs involved, what would fr o ? Does the product
be the break-even point for at ra? require speciali ed production,
London Business School Case Book 91
RefreshNow Soda
Question 2
After reviewing the key factors fr o should consider in deciding whether to launch at ra, your team wants to
understand the beverage market and consumer preferences to gauge potential success of at ra.
The bottled market splits into non-sparkling, sparkling, and imports. Flavored water falls within non-sparkling. Your team
has gathered the following information on the U.S. bottled water market. The information shows an estimate for the share of
avored water, as well as the current share for the two main products: Cool and O2Flavor.
Exhibit 1
Fictitious exhibit
S Bottled water market
Millions of gallons
Cool
20%
70%
Other
Based on the target price and upfront In order to launch at ra, The VP of Operations estimates
xed costs, what share of the avored fr o would need to incur that each bottle would cost $1.90
non-sparkling bottled water would $40 million as total xed costs, to produce and deliver in the newly
at ra need to capture in order to including marketing expenses as established process.
break even? Here is some additional well as increased costs across
information for you to consider as you the production and distribution
form your response: network
at ra would launch in a 16 o .
presentation 1 8 of a gallon with a
price of $2.00 to retailers
Describe your approach and talk the interviewer through your calculation. The more you talk the easier it will be for
your interviewer to help you
92 London Business School Case Book
RefreshNow Soda
A very good answer would include 1 at ra would need to sell 400 2 at ra would need to capture a
the following: million units in order to break 12.5% market share:
at ra would need to capture a even: on-sparkling avored bottled
12.5% market share of avored non- Variable prot per unit water market 5% x 8,000
sparkling bottled water in order to $2.00 $1.90 $0.10 million gallons 400 million
break even. Therefore, at ra would gallons
need to be the umber 2 product in Break even units Total xed
the market: costs Variable prot per unit at ra sales in millions of
$40 million $0.10 per unit gallons 400 million units 8
400 million units units per gallon 50 million
gallons
Question 3
fr o executives believe that the companys position as the top 3 beverage company in the country gives them
strategic strengths toward achieving the desired market share. However, they ask the team to characteri e realistically what
they would need to achieve that target.
What would fr o need to ensure realistically to gain the required market share for at ra 12.5% of non-sparkling
avored bottled water ?
A very good answer would include Strong Branding Marketing Create Operational Capabilities. nsure
the following: a successful introductory marketing access to preferred distribution
Match with Consumer Preferences campaign, including advertising, channels. nsure sales force
nsure product image, attributes, pricing, and bundling promotions. capabilties to sell the new product.
and quality fulll the needs of all Leverage top 3 producer status and nsure production ramp-up that allows
consumers or niche segment, reaching limited market fragmentation in order response to increased demand.
desired market share. nsure target to position at ra brand within top
price is consistent with other products 3 in the market segment. Anticipate
in the market and the consumers response from competitors e.g.,
expectations advertising, pricing, distribution
agreements . nsure product
positioning does not cannibali e on
other, more protable, fr o
products. ote: In marketing, the
decreased demand for an existing
product that occurs when its vendor
releases a new or similar product
is called cannibali ation . It is not
important for you to use this business
terminiology.
London Business School Case Book 93
RefreshNow Soda
Question
Within the key drivers for market share, fr o wants to know which to tackle rst and what the strategy should be.
Therefore McKinsey helped fr o design and run a study to understand branding and distribution. The following
information shows results from the study, based on a sample of target consumers. What can you conclude from the study in
regards to the preferred marketing image and strategy of at ra?
Cool la o r Other
10
Healthy non-alcholic Other 30 10
50 20 30
beverage
20
Caf restaurant 10
Sports drink 20 10 70
Convenience store 30
60
A very good answer would include Distribution differs from Marketing message to emphasi e
the following insights: current outlets and needs new identity and availability Marketing
Branding should emphasi e sports agreements research Major shifts campaign should be built around the
drink identity Healthy identity is compared to current distribution currently unaddressed market need
dominated by Cool product, Leisure model required in Supermarkets , for sports drink in order to connect
by O2Flavor and Sports fragmented Other , and Convenience stores . with customers in that segment.
in other products. Clear niche within Agreements with major retail players iven required changes in distribution
Sports identity, with top 2 brands may accommodate for product channels, at ra messaging should
currently occupying only 30% of share introduction, with fr o clarify new distribution strategy.
of mind. Sports branding should also managing mix across channels.
determine thinking around the sales Other channels need further
channels e.g., sales during sports research, since they are a major
events or at sports facilities component of the Flavored water
segment
9 London Business School Case Book
RefreshNow Soda
Question
The team now explores fr o s internal operational capacity to fulll the projected at ra demand. fr o
has decided to produce at ra from an existing dedicated production line in a single facility. In order to be on the safe
side in case of increased demand they plan for an annual capacity of 420 million bottles units of at ra. The production
line they have in mind currently operates for 20 hours per day, 7 days a week and 50 weeks per year. The speed for the
current bottling process is 750 units per minute.
Is the current production capacity sufcient to fulll the desired annual production plan of 420 million bottles of at ra?
A very good answer would include Daily production 750 bottles per Annual production 6.3 million
the following: minute x 60 minutes per hour x 20 bottles per week x 50 weeks per
fr o Would need to increase hours per day 0.9 million bottles year 315 million bottles
its capacity because it would currently
only allow to produce 315 million Weekly production 0.9 million
bottles of at ra: bottles per day x 7 days per week
6.3 million bottles
Question 6
iven the need for a speciali ed production process for at ra, the company has decided to add a new production line to
only one of their 5 facilities. What factors should they consider in selecting the adequate plant?
RefreshNow Soda
Question
The fr o C O has seen the teams analysis and conrms that the decision to launch at ra has been made.
The product will be marketed as a sports drink, produced in the Midwest US, and distributed through supermarkets,
convenience stores, and sport outlets. He asks the team what the company should start doing tomorrow?
nsure to mention different insights instead of immediately diving very deep into one insight. Then ask your interviewer
if he she wants to go deeper on any of them
A very good response would include Marketing to start designing launch Sales to start designing product
the following: strategy approach and training for
Finance to allocate required Design product identity, message, Associates
resources for launch packaging, etc. Collaborate with marketing in
Communicate launch decision and dening message for retail outlets
timeline to Finance department Create advertising and promotional and consumers
campaign
Analy e upfront investment and Design distribution strategy and
ongoing protability targets Dene any channel-specic allocate resources for new product
considerations e.g., displays,
Secure resources required for alternative campaigns Design and deliver product training
initial investment and allocate to for sales
each department e.g., Marketing, Prepare product communications
Sales, Production, Distribution for investors, customers, and Communicate new product
consumers characteristics and targets to
clients e.g., supermarkets,
Operations to begin product convenience stores, restaurants,
testing production line design and sport clubs .
logistics.
Create and test product
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose PROFIT
Europe
Footloose: Introduction
Dura ex is a erman footwear Together, these four brands represent on-the-job purposes. Casual boots is
company with annual mens footwear approximately 72% of the 5.0 billion the fastest growing sub-category, and
sales of approximately 1.0 billion erman mens boot market. The boots is geared more towards white collar
uro . category includes four main sub- workers2 and students who purchase
categories: these boots for week-end casual
They have always relied on the boot wear and light work purposes.
market for the majority of their volume Work boots, casual boots, eld and
and in this market they compete with hunting boots, and winter boots. Work The four key competitors in the market
three other major competitors. boots is the largest sub-category and are Badger, Dura ex, Steeler, and
is geared to blue collar workers1 who Trekker.
purchase these boots primarily for
Competitor Proles
Badger and Steeler are both well
established as work boot companies, Market Share of ork and Casual Boots by Company
having a long history and strong brand
recognition and credibility among blue
collar workers. At the other extreme is 43%
Trekker, a strong player in the casual Badger
11%
boot market but a very weak player
in work boots. Dura ex, however, is a
16%
cross between the other competitors, Duraflex
40%
having a signicant share in both work
boots and casual boots.
19%
Steeler
Historically Dura ex had an even 4%
1 Blue collar workers: wage earners who generally work in manual or industrial labour and often require special work clothes or protective clothing, which are replaced
approximately every 6 months
2 White collar workers: salaried employees who perform knowledge work, such as those in professional, managerial or administrative positions
London Business School Case Book 9
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
80%
Bought work boots
in past year
70
Bought casual boots
60% in past year
60
55%
50
40
35%
30
25%
20 20%
15%
10
0
Blue Collar White Collar Student
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
100%
16
21 21
26 Other
Other Other
Other
80
6 1
13 Athletic Store Apparel Store
Dept. Store 11
Sporting oods
Channel Share %
16
60 1 Dept. Store
3 13
Discount Outlet
Shoe Store Discount Outlet
40 23 22
Athletic Store Safety Work
Shoe Store
20 39
2 Safety Work 2
Shoe Store Shoe Store
0
Duraflex Badger Steeler Trekker
uality
Styling 45% 45% Comfort 52% Comfort 45%
Durability
uality uality
37% Comfort 39% 43% Styling 41%
Durability Durability
Past
Comfort 19% 30% Styling 22% Price 35%
xperience
Past
Features 10% Brand 13% Price 15% xperience 13%
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
180
1 euros
160
Company Margin 22
1 euros
140
12 euros Retailer Margin Company Margin 16
120
Company Margin 1 eneral & Admin. 1 Retailer Margin 6
100 eneral & Admin. 11
Retail price
Labour 12 Materials 32
20 Materials 21
Materials 1
0
Duraflex Casual Duraflex Work Badger
Work through these questions on your own, using the text and exhibits in the preceding pages. An answer key is
provided in the pages that follow
Question 1
How big is the work boot market expressed in euros ? Does Dura ex get more of its revenue from work boots or casual
boots?
Question 2
Question 3
What changes would you recommend to Dura exs work boot strategy? Why? Would you recommend they introduce a sub-
branded boot line?
1 London Business School Case Book
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
Answer Q1: How big is the work boot market expressed in euros Does Dura ex get more of its
revenue from work boots or casual boots
Average Boots Price x % of male population that bought work boots in past year
x total population for the segment x number of pairs bought in a year
Exhibit One gives us the populations for each segment and the percentages that bought boots. We therefore need to
nd the n m r of oot old and the a ra ri of a air. For this question, the candidate will need to make some
assumptions.
1 Average number of boots purchased per user 2 Average price per pair of boots
For work boots, we know that blue collar workers Work boots cost more compare Blue Collar vs. Student so
purchase an average of 2 pairs per year from the average price should be higher than 140 for all 150
Introduction, Footnote1 is reasonable casual should be lower than student 100-110
is reasonable .
White collar workers and students who buy work
boots probably use less rigorously and less frequently,
therefore ro a l onl air r ar
The total market value will then be the sum for each segment of the following equation:
Average Boots Price x % of male population that bought work boots in past year
x total population for the segment x number of pairs bought in a year
150 x 60% x 11Mill x 2 150 x 25% x 12 Mill x 1 150 x 15% x 7 Mill x 1 2 Mill or 2 6 Bill
Pairs
Buying ork work boots
Population Boots bought year Price Per Pair Segment Si e
Blue Collar 11.0 Million 60% 2 150 2.0 Billion
White Collar 12.0 Million 25% 1 150 450 Million
Student 7.0 Million 15% 1 150 155 Million
Total 2 6 Billion
London Business School Case Book 1 1
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
Average Boots Price x % of male population that bought work boots in past year
x total population for the segment x number of pairs bought in a year
100 x 20% x 11Mill x 1 100 x 35% x 12 Mill 1 100 x 55% x 7 Mill x 1 1 2 Mill or 1 Bill
Or:
Pairs
Buying ork work boots
Population Boots bought year Price Per Pair Segment Si e
Blue Collar 11.0 Million 20% 1 100 220 Million
White Collar 12.0 Million 35% 1 100 420 Million
Student 7.0 Million 55% 1 100 385 Million
Total 1 Billion
Summary
We know from xhibit 1 that Dura ex has a 16% share of the work boot market and 40% of the casual boot market,
therefore:
Dura ex s revenue from the work boot market 16 x 2 6 Bill 16 Mill
Dura ex s revenue from the casual boot market x 1 Bill Mil
So Dura ex gets most of its revenue from work boots, even though the revenues are almost evenly split
Our Answer:
The work boot market is 2.6 Billion . The casual boot market is 1.0 billion . Dura ex generates 416 Million from
work and 400 Million from casual. Depending on assumptions, casual may be slightly larger but the two should be
relatively close.
1 2 London Business School Case Book
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
Answer Q2: Explain why Badger is outperforming Dura ex in the work boot market
According to the data we have, and what we know as industry dynamics, the analysis can be split in 4 main areas that would
demand further study:
Distribution
Pricing
Cost analysis
ven if you have many good ideas to answer this question, you wont be impressive without STRUCTUR . You dont
need a formal framework, just be methodical and organised in your approach and summarise at the end
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
Cost Analysis
Summary
Dura ex is not sold where work boots are being purchased
Dura ex is not meeting the key needs of blue collar workers, as it is weaker than competitors on the critical Comfort
dimension
Badger prices its boots more competitively, which is likely to be particularly appealing to the large work boot market this
has helped develop a large and loyal consumer base
Badger has lower retailer margins both absolute and relative and spends less on Sales & Marketing
Answer Q3: hat changes would you recommend to Dura ex s work boot strategy hy ould you
recommend they introduce a sub branded boot line
There are two reasonable answers to this question The company can either:
The important thing with a subjective question is not what you answer to the question, but how you answer the question
pick a point of view and support it with critical reasoning
1 London Business School Case Book
Monitor Deloitte
Footloose
ustication: Implications:
Represents approximately 40% of Dura exs business nter safety work channel we may be faced with
from question 1 , making it very difcult to protably pressure from Badger exerting in uence on retailers in
ignore this market this channel
While Dura ex does have greater market share in the Build comfort and quality durability perception
casual boot market, we know from information given in among blue collar workers
the case that the casual boot market is smaller in si e
than the work boot market, which may indicate less Increase proportion of costs allocated to materials and
opportunity for share growth also, we derive lower labour potentially reducing company margin
margins 15% vs. 21% from casual boots from xhibit 4
There may be unique niche positionings for Dura ex
iven that Badger is introducing a new work line, they suggestions should be well thought out
may see new growth potential in the market which
Dura ex may also want to capitalise on Introduce sub-brand or increase promotion of brand
with a focus on blue collar workers: may include on-
Building a stronger image among blue collar workers site promotions, advertising in industry publications,
may entice them to try other Dura ex footwear products or advertising in maga ines on television during
programmes with a higher blue collar readership
viewership
ustication: Implications:
Stronghold for Dura ex right now 40% market share Unlikely to be a strong competitor reaction, since
Dura ex is already dominant player
Fastest growing market
Dura ex will not need to enter new distribution channels
Represents approximately 40% of Dura exs business
from question 1 , making it very difcult to protably Candidate should discuss a strategy for work boot
ignore this market market either winding down, maintenance etc. and
implications of this
Focusing additional resources on work boot market
would risk of alienating casual boot buyers white collar
workers and students
join.rolandberger.com
1 6 London Business School Case Book
Europe
Case Background
MPC is a global mobile phone handset manufacturer that has seen its market share in urope by value slip from 20% ve
years ago to 1% today. MPC has discussed its ambition to become relevant in urope again and has set itself a stretch
target to get back to its previous market share position. The uropean handset market has traditionally been dominated by
two players but the last few years has witnessed new entrants from the far ast.
Question
hat volume does MPC need Information to be provided as a Suggested approach:
to regain its past market share response to candidate questions: 1 Assess the si e of market in ve
position and what key challenges Assess only the ve key markets of key countries by volume and value
does it face in getting there UK, ermany, France, Spain and 2 Assess what MPC needs to
Italy populations of 60m, 80m, achieve to reach its goal by volume
65m, 45m, 60m and value
uropean mobile market is 3 Discuss the key challenges that
dominated by four key operators ABC needs to overcome
that handset manufacturers sell to
Vodafone, Orange, Telefonica O2,
T-Mobile
Handsets are split into two tiers
smartphones and feature phones
Smartphone penetration rate
across 5 key markets should be
assumed to be 35%
The main task will come in the next section where the candidate will need to demonstrate the ability to rationalise what this
ambition means for MPC.
xample calculation:
K er Fr Sp It Total T
Population 60 80 65 40 60 305 Data provided
Ratio of Mobile penetration 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Assumptions from candidate
Mobiles in circulation 75 100 81 50 75 381 Calculation required
Smartphone 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Data provided
Smartphone mn phones 26 35 28 18 26 133 Calculation required
Feature phones mn phones 49 65 53 33 49 248 Calculation required
Smartphones replacement rate yrs 2 2 2 2 2 Assumptions from candidate
Feature phone replacement rate yrs 3 3 3 3 3 Assumptions from candidate
Smartphones sold in a year mn phones 13 18 14 9 13 67 Calculation required
Feature phones sold in a year mn phones 16 22 18 11 16 83 Calculation required
Value of average smartphone E R 300 300 300 300 300 Assumptions from candidate
Value of average feature phone E R 100 100 100 100 100 Assumptions from candidate
Market value E R bn 5.6 7.4 6 3.7 5.6 28.3
MPC current market share value E R bn 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.3
Assume split of MPC phones smartphone 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assumptions from candidate
vs feature
in smartphones mn phones 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.23 Calculation required
in feature phones mn phones 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.29 Calculation required
MPC market share ambition value E R bn 2 1.1 1.5 1.2 0.7 1.1 5.7
Assume split of MPC phones smartphone 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assumptions from candidate
vs feature
in smartphones mn phones 0.92 1.23 1 0.61 0.92 4.67 Calculation required
in feature phones mn phones 1.14 1.52 1.23 0.76 1.14 5.78 Calculation required
Case Background
A private jet charter company, P C, has 5 aircraft, Lear ets which are used by businessmen, heads of state and high
net worth individuals. The jets are now 8 years old and while recent performance has been very good, there are some
individuals in the company who think it is time to replace the eet as it is looking a little tired. In fact, customers are
beginning to say that they prefer competitors planes because they are new, but this might be just because the cabins
are more up to date. The market is growing and P C remains the markets leading prestige brand. If the aircraft full the
customers criteria, there is enough demand to go round.
Question
Should Privet et Co replace its Information to be provided as a Suggested approach:
eet response to candidate questions: 1 stablish that the options are:
Aircraft tilisation a do nothing, continue with the
Aircraft utilisation is measured existing eet
in Block Hours 500 hours is b replace the eet with new
considered excellent aircraft
Older aircraft are less popular in c refurbish the existing eet
another 5 years, utilisation will
halve Start with asking the interviewer
Utilisation is driven more by questions about the business
facilities e.g. cabin, seats, in- ight model and various dynamics.
movies than aircraft age Identify the revenue and variable
cost components of P Cs
Pricing business and demonstrate clear
The price to charter a Lear et is thinking about the dynamics
USD 3,000 per BH that affect each.
The Interview
Step 1: IdentifyProcess
the evaluation structure
A simple evaluation model can be used The key differentiator here is criteria including cost, safety, prestige,
to generate three PV cases. The key recognising that there is a third way comfort and the latest facilities e.g.
point here is to rst create a baseline refurbishment. This is hinted at in the being able to connect phones and
case in which the cash ow of a do- question and will be made available laptops while in ight .
nothing approach is calculated. Once in the information above should the
this has been achieved, the same candidate ask the right questions. The
calculations can be re-run for the other aircraft age is a key driver of costs but
investment scenarios. the customer is driven by a range of
Calculate revenue from declining Calculate revenue which will hold rm as Calculate revenue which will hold rm
utilisation as customers choose customers continue to use P Cs newer as customers continue to use P Cs
competitors planes over P C planes newer planes cabin not aircraft is
important
Calculate variable costs driven by cost Calculate variable costs which will
per Block Hour, which will increase over remain stable due to lower maintenance Calculate variable costs driven
the time due to aircraft age and fuel costs on newer planes by cost per Block Hour, which will
increase over time due to aircraft age
Calculate cash ow which will be the Calculate cash ow driven by investment
same as gross margin due to absence of in replacement eets Calculate cash ow driven by
capital investment investment in re-furbishing eets
Cash Flow
USD 1,500 per BH, rising to
PV calculation
Variable Cost Cost per BH 2,000 hours per BH after 5
should assume
yrs for old a c
10% discount rate
Developing a top-down revenue and In addition, variable costs xed costs that the company is no longer
cost model over 5 years will enable can be ignored in this comparison are growing a lack of investment leads to
the candidate to build a cash ow rising as the aircraft spends more time stagnation and eventual decline.
and PV. For the baseline case, on the ground being xed, fuel costs
revenues will decline over time as the increase. By 2013, the engines will
aircraft interiors look increasingly old have completed the maximum 4,500 The comparison only needs to be
compared to newer aircraft owned by hours and will require an overhaul completed for a single aircraft but
the competitors. In 5 years time, as costing USD 1 million for two engines. it is important that the candidate
many as half of all bookings are going clearly states this assumption.
to competitors. The resultant cash ow will be positive
but the candidate should recognise
Baseline 2 12 2 13 2 1 2 1 2 16 2 1
Block Hours 500 450 400 350 300 250
Price per BH USD 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Revenue 1 13 12 1 9
Var. cost per BH 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000
Total OpEx 2 6 63
ross Prot 750,000 630,000 520,000 420,000 330,000 250,000
Cap x 1,000,000
FCF 750,000 370,000 520,000 420,000 330,000 250,000
NPV 1 399 6 10% discount rate
For re- eeting, P C needs to spend USD 6 million on a new plane in 2012 but no longer needs to overhaul the engines. The
new plane will enable full utilisation of 500 block hours per aircraft and will stop costs from rising so fast in the future at
least for the time being .
Re New Fleet 2 12 2 13 2 1 2 1 2 16 2 1
Block Hours 500 500 500 500 500 500
Price per BH USD 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Revenue 1 1 1 1 1 1
Var. cost per BH 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
Total OpEx
ross Prot 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000
Cap x 6,000,000
FCF 5,250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000
NPV 21 1 10% discount rate
For re-furbishing the planes, P C incurs much lower capital expenses - USD 1 m per aircraft in 2012 and USD 1 m per
aircraft in 2013 remember the engines will still need overhauling . The costs will continue to rise as the aircraft maintenance
bills will still be higher although fuel costs may be improved due to the overhaul. Most importantly, P C will maintain full
utilisation on the aircraft without needing to tie up USD 6 million in capital.
Refurbish Fleet 2 12 2 13 2 1 2 1 2 16 2 1
Block Hours 500 500 500 500 500 500
Price per BH USD 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Revenue 1 1 1 1 1 1
Var. cost per BH 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000
Total OpeEx 9 9 1
ross Prot 750,000 700,000 650,000 600,000 550,000 500,000
Cap x 1,000,000 1,000,000
FCF 250,000 300,000 650,000 600,000 550,000 500,000
NPV 1 6 10% discount rate
Replacing a single aircraft will generate and negative PV of over USD 2 million using the above assumptions.
Simply re-furbishing the aircraft will generate a positive PV of over USD 1 million if the numbers provided here are applied.
London Business School Case Book 111
Case Question
A free-to-air TV network is experiencing stagnating revenues. At the moment, a major shareholder is seeking to exit and is
expecting management to create and deliver on a growth strategy for the group. You are supposed to support management
in nding ways to grow revenues through diversication.
Intro Facts tell the candidate if asked Key Insights do not share with the candidate
Q: What are the clients current revenue streams? The core business, TV advertising, is stagnating.
A: More than 90% of revenues stem from TV advertising Additionally, winning market share from other free-to-air
TV broadcasters is hard to achieve
Q: How is the TV advertising market developing?
A: In general, it follows the economy, but the share of TV in Clients main assets are promotional power, brand, and
overall ad spending is stagnating declining content
nderstanding the problem Structuring the solution Quantifying one of the ideas
The TV advertising market is Ideas to leverage content Structure depending on the idea
stagnating Ideas to leverage brand xpectations:
Advertising budgets are being Ideas to leverage promotional Structured approach, driven by
shifted to online reach volumes and prices
Digiti ation has led to various new Business sense: What
TV stations and increasing clients assumptions are reasonable
share of the advertising market is achievable?
very hard to achieve
London Business School Case Book 113
1 6 1 2
16
Other
1 1 0.8 0.8 Outdoor
1 1 16 0.8
0.7 0.8 1.5 2.1 2.2 Online
0.3 0.7 0.7 0.8
0.3 0.4
2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9
2.6 Other print
1.9 1.9 1.8
1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 Maga ines
Possible structure for calculating the moneti ation potential of online videos
x
Sold Inventory et CPM
et advertising
ross- et
Key gures for website performance measurement revenues
ap
Reported calculated data KPIs
London Business School Case Book 11
North America
Intro Facts tell the candidate if asked Key Insights do not tell the candidate
All of the required facts are in the article The company invested $400m in launching a satellite
Further assumptions to be provided by the interviewer Theoretically the best way to assess whether this is a
good business is to perform an PV analysis. But that is
too complicated for mental maths
Identify the rural broadband market as Start with US population Product is aimed at very specic
the target segment ok to identify other segment, which is probably too small
segments, eg. Air transport as upside Convert to households to sustain it
Candidate should suggest calculating Make estimate about urban rural split Ask candidate what could be changed
an PV and explain how this shows to widen appeal of product. Key insight
that this is a good business Make further assumption about how here is that the company should look
much of this is already served by DSL for ways to market the product more
Candidate should notice that the widely without destroying the price
product cannot compete against other Identify that some households will premium it enjoys in its target markets
technologies because of price never be addressable
Rural Broadband
A newly launched $250m satellite will While most satellites are primarily used intensive services such as et ix and
soon start transmitting broadband for one-way broadcasting, ViaSat-1 Hulu has increased. Wild Blue hasnt
internet to rural US consumers the will be able to handle the two-way changed its service for six years, he
latest effort by telecommunications transmission of data at 140 gigabytes said. That isnt considered a good
groups to satisfy skyrocketing demand per second. That is more bandwidth value anymore. ViaSat had revenues
for high speed residential data than the combined capacity of Intelsat of $223m in the most recent quarter
services. and S S, ViaSats two largest peers, with net income of just $8m.
Mr Dankberg said.
The new satellite from ViaSat will give Shares in the company are up 16 per
the asdaq-listed company, based Intelsat, the worlds largest provider cent over the past month to about
in California, the ability to effectively of xed satellite services, recently $47, giving it a market capitalisation of
compete with other non premium outlined plans to invest $1.3bn in four $2bn. Its Wild Blue service has about
internet providers, which still are new satellite launches by the end of 400,000 customers in the US paying
the only options for millions of US 2012. ViaSat, in October successfully about $50 per month for satellite
consumers. launched its new ViaSat-1, one of the internet services. Mr Dankberg hopes
highest capacity data satellites in the to treble the number of subscribers in
Its bandwidth will also be used to world. Launched with a Proton rocket the coming year with capacity from the
power the in- ight wireless internet in Ka akhstan, the satellite is now in new satellite. The company also makes
service for etBlue, the US carrier. geosynchronous orbit 22,500 miles money by supplying components to
above the earth. It is powered by 100 other satellite makers, and selling
The ViaSat launch is likely to meter wide solar panels. Including services to companies and the US
be welcomed by the Federal launch costs and insurance, the government.
Communications Commission, which satellite cost ViaSat $400m.
is pushing for solutions to the digital One of ViaSats customers is Dish
divide, especially in rural areas. If Mr Dankberg conceded that his etworks, the satellite TV provider,
we have a really good service at industry faces an uphill battle. which resells its service to US
a reasonable price, we can keep Satellite doesnt have a good consumers. arlier this year Dishs
expanding the market, said Mark reputation for broadband service, parent company, choStar, acquired
he said. Moreover, WildBlue, the Hughes Communications, a ViaSat
Dankberg, ViaSats chief executive. consumer facing service ViaSat rival, a move that could see Dish drop
Satellite will be better for a lot of acquired in 2009, has not upgraded ViaSat as a supplier.
people than DSL, 3 or 4 . its service, even as the use of data
London Business School Case Book 11
Rural Broadband
Differentiation between poor average and superior performance for review after the case interview
Identifying relevant Does not correctly identify Identies, amount invested Understands that
information sum invested which is and attempts to drill down consumer choice in rural
written into the story . Fails into denition of rural, but markets very different
to understand importance stops short of a convincing to other markets. g. o
of rural target market for reason why rural market is 3 & unlikely to be cable
the product an important denition internet. Only choice is
DSL. Probes to nd out
about DSL distance limits
Running calculations Does not si e the market Is able to correctly si e the Si es the market and is
drawing conclusions from correctly ie. does not market using appropriate able to relate si e of market
facts use estimates to drill down assumptions guided by the to likely market revenue
from US population to rural interviewer using ARPU assumptions.
population. Si es market Candidate then attempts to
on people not households compare BITDA potential
against investment cost
Identifying key implications Does not reali e how Si es the market correctly Si es the market and
and next steps small the target market and is able to identify proposes creative ways
demonstrates creativity is compared to the requirement for further to expand the appeal
investment cost upside non rural markets, of the product without
airline market to justify compromising the price
investment cost premium the product
can command in its main
market
11 London Business School Case Book
Case Competitions
The Interview Process
Case Background
It was the end of the week Paul Marcun was shutting down for the day, no closer to resolving his dilemma. As Vice
President for thicon ndo Surgery S in M A, he had been working on the business plan for the next nancial year
when his attention was drawn to the data on the trocar business. It was clear that something was going on in the market and
that he needed to quickly get to the bottom of it.
S is one of the ohnson & ohnsons surgery globally through innovation in The S product range for
medical devices businesses, product design, high quality products, laparoscopic surgery includes access
specialising in products used for open professional education and excellent devices trocars , stapling devices,
and minimal access surgery as well support teams across the world. This ligating devices, surgical instruments
as advanced energy devices. The contributed to the increase in lap and advanced energy devices.
business has grown from start-up in surgery adoption from inception in
1992 to a $4.7B1 global business. With 1990 to estimated 40% in 2010.
headquarters in Cincinnati Ohio, its
business extends across all regions.
3 This means that the procedure requires more instances of passing instruments through the trocars and thus the quality of the trocar can have a direct impact on
procedure duration.
London Business School Case Book 121
Competitive landscape
In 2010, thicon ndo-Surgery led Applied Medical held the third-leading Hospitals in developed markets
the uropean market for trocars position in the disposable trocar will typically sign an annual supply
with the DOPATH C L trocar market in 2010, and has been rapidly contract with a trocar manufacturer
range, followed closely by Covidien. gaining market share in urope over so that switching between suppliers
DOPATH C L is seen as the the last few years, particularly in the during a year is uncommon. However,
premium top performing trocar in UK, ermany, and France. Applied emerging markets are often tender
the market. Both of these rms were Medical competes in this market by driven for quarterly purchases.
successful by holding strong positions offering its products at a much lower
in the disposable segment, which price than thicon ndo-Surgery and In the much smaller reusable trocar
generates about 3 times the revenue of Covidien, which allows it to secure segment, KARL STOR is the market
the reusable segment about 5 times in contracts among cost-conscious leader, followed by Olympus. A few
developed markets . Furthermore, both hospitals. Applied Medical is also other competitors were also active in
of these companies are well-known expanding its reach into the emerging the uropean trocar market, including
international rms with high-quality markets of M A with its low cost Richard Wolf, Aesculap a B. Braun
devices and wide product ranges. offering being very attractive to those company , and CO M D. See table 2
markets. for market share estimates. Also see
Both of these companies are well table 3 for estimated relative pricing.
positioned to remain leaders in the
trocar market through 2015.
Signicant trends
Reports from the market have in some countries. In emerging of tro ar disposable trocars
highlighted the following key trends in markets, the reverse has occurred are often re-sterilised and reused in
the markets: where countries are posting good the emerging markets of the region.
DP growth and increasing healthcare iven infection risks, the trend is not
ro in inimal n a i ro d r spend. observed in the developed markets but
Ado tion countries all across the it is estimated that trocars are used
M A region are increasingly adopting n r a in o r of non lini al approximately 1.8 times in the emerging
laparoscopy with MIP penetration rate ta old r the role of the markets. The main identied motivation
of 37% overall. For basic procedures physicians as the primary decision for reuse is cost reduction as the price
in developed markets, the penetration maker in the selection of medical of a trocar is spread across multiple
rates are over 70% while emerging consumables has been changing over uses. However improving patient
countries are still below 50%. The several years to a point where hospital awareness and regulatory environment
MIP penetration rates are expected administration staff now have equal in the emerging markets may reduce
to increase into 2018, mostly in the or greater roles in product selection. level of reuse.
advanced laparoscopy segment This has increased the role of price
aided by improved physician skills in purchase decisions for hospitals in l ort la aro o In urope,
and acceptance by health technology across the region. there is considerable interest in
assessment bodies of laparoscopy as the use of single-port laparoscopy
recommended over open procedures5. ro t of lo o t om titor there devices, which are generally priced
See table 4 for procedure volume are increasing numbers of low cost at a premium. Whereas adoption
forecasts into 2018. manufacturers entering the trocar rates are still very low less than 1%
market, targeting customers in both of laparoscopic procedures , industry
lo al onomi rforman the the developed and emerging markets. sources expect that the use of these
recent recession and current sovereign Whereas the quality and performance devices will increase over the forecast
debt crisis across much of urope has of the low cost competitor products period, driven by improved physician
led to cuts in government spending are usually 30% 50% below the training, favourable results from clinical
across the region. In developed levels for the premium products6, the studies, and patient demand for the
markets, government healthcare quality is perceived to be improving single-port technique7. S piloted a
spending is declining by up to 10% especially for basic laparoscopic Single Site Laparoscopy SSL port in
procedures. 2009 but has not executed a full launch.
Paul s dilemma
The data from the eld was showing ENDOPATH CE trocar upgrade The BAS pro ect
increasing price pressure in the There has been very limited innovation S has developed a new range of
trocar business with more customers in the trocar product space. The trocars called BAS . These trocars
considering the lower cost trocars product technology has largely are suitable for basic laparoscopic
as a way to reduce procedure input remained the same over the last 20 procedures but not considered ideal
costs. It increasingly looks like the years with only limited enhancements for advanced procedures8. There is
DOPATH C L will struggle to made by the leading competitors. the possibility to launch this product.
maintain its market share at the current However, S has been working on The manufacturing and distribution
price point. A number of marketing some signicant enhancements to the costs of the BAS will be similar to
teams from countries in the region are DOPATH C L range which would the DOPATH C L so that there
considering price changes to respond signicantly improve its performance will be gross margin variation with
to the growing low cost competition. by addressing some of the key DOPATH C L based on the
This will have signicant implications concerns reported by physicians in relative price decided.
on the business plan numbers for next performing laparoscopic surgery.
year and into the strategic planning
hori on. He also has two projects to
consider in deciding a plan for the
trocar business.
our challenge
Paul needs to make some decisions and has scheduled a meeting with S President to discuss his plans and requires
your advice.
Questions to answer:
1 As Paul, would you recommend 2 What change if any would you 4 What steps and or other
the launch of BAS and at what make to the positioning of the considerations would you
segment market should it be C L trocars range? What will be propose for implementing your
positioned? If decided to launch, the revenue impact? recommendations?
at what price relative to the
DOPATH C L range? 3 What if any wider strategic
recommendation would you
make to the Company President
regarding the trocar portfolio in
M A?
Exhibits
Table 1 EMEA Trocar Market Estimates
Value Market in M SD 2 2 9 2 1 2 11 2 12 2 13 2 1 2 1 2 16 2 1 2 1 CA R
Total market reusable & disposable $ M $414.46 $434.72 $454.82 $467.16 $477.61 $491.40 $505.63 $520.78 $537.09 $555.71 $575.11 3.01%
reusable market $ M $109.38 $114.61 $119.05 $119.56 $120.04 $120.83 $121.74 $122.70 $124.15 $126.06 $127.89 0.97%
Disposable new market $ M $305.08 $320.11 $335.77 $347.60 $357.57 $370.56 $383.88 $398.08 $412.94 $429.66 $447.23 3.67%
S Sales $ M $176.12 $187.48 $202.54 $212.26 $220.05 $229.13 $238.86 $249.12 $260.03 $272.12 $284.80 4.29%
on- S Sales $ M $128.96 $132.64 $133.22 $135.35 $137.53 $141.43 $145.03 $148.96 $152.90 $157.54 $162.43 2.64%
Total market growth rate 4.89% 4.62% 2.71% 2.24% 2.89% 2.90% 3.00% 3.13% 3.47% 3.49%
Source: Internal stimates