Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Constitutional Law II
Atty. V. Paul Le. Montejo
PRELIMINARIES
Academic Freedom
CASES:
Garcia vs. Faculty of Admission (G.R. No. L-40779, 28 November 1975, 68 SCRA
277)
DLSU vs. CA (G.R. No. 127980, 19 December 2007, 541 SCRA 22)
CSC vs. Sojor (G.R. No. 168766, 22 May 2008, 554 SCRA 160)
Mercado vs. AMA (G.R. No. 183572, 13 April 2010, 618 SCRA 218)
Calawag vs. UP Visayas (G.R. No. 207412, 7 August 2013, 703 SCRA 373)
ANNOTATION:
(313 SCRA 428)
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
1 | Page
Bocea vs. Teves (G.R. No. 181704, 06 December 2011, 661 SCRA 589)
Cabalit vs. COA (663 SCRA 133, 2012)
Ylaya vs. Gacott (689 SCRA 452, 2013)
ANNOTATION:
Just Compensation in Eminent Domain (686 SCRA 869)
F. Equal Protection
Article III, Section 1, 1987 Constitution
1. Economic Equality
Article II, Section 14
Article III, Section 11 (Free Access)
Article VIII, Section 5, Paragraph 5 (Legal Aid)
Article XII, Section 2 (Marine Resources)
Article XII, Section 10 (Nationalization)
Article XIII, Sections 1-2 (Social Justice)
Article XIII, Section 3 (Protection to Labor)
2. Political Equality
Article IX-C, Section 10 (Discrimination)
Article XIII, Section 1 (Social Justice)
CASES:
Dumlao vs. COMELEC (95 SCRA 392, 1980)
Quinto vs. COMELEC (606 SCRA 258, 2009; February 2010 Decision)
Ang Ladlad vs. COMELEC (618 SCRA 32, 2010)
3.Social Equality
Article XIII, Section 1
ANNOTATION:
2 | Page
Social Justice (645 SCRA 401, 2011)
4. Other Cases
Trillanes vs. Pimentel (556 SCRA 471)
Soriano vs. Laguardia (587 SCRA 79, 2009)
Chamber of Real vs. Romulo (614 SCRA 605, 2010)
Bocea vs. Teves (661 SCRA 589, 2011)
Del Castillo vs. People (664 SCRA 450, 2012)
Commissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix Feeds (664 SCRA666, 2012)
Manotok vs. Heirs of Barque (667 SCRA 472, 2012)
Garcia vs. Drilon (699 SCRA 667, 2013)
Aquino vs. PPA (696 SCRA 666, 2013)
National Artist vs. Executive Secretary (701 SCRA 269, 2013)
ANNOTATION:
Revisiting Fundamental Concepts in Constitutional Law (663 SCRA 661,
2012)
ANNOTATION:
Search and Seizure (291 SCRA 418)
Warrantless Search and Seizure of Prohibited Drugs (610 SCRA 670,
2010)
Search and Seizure (643 SCRA 637, 2011)
Law and Jurisprudence on Search Warrants and Warrantless
Searches (664 SCRA 450, 2012)
3 | Page
Martinez vs. People (690 SCRA 656, 2013)
ANNOTATION:
Plain View Doctrine (609 SCRA 434, 2009)
e. Express Waiver
CASES:
Veroy vs. Layague (210 SCRA 92, 1992)
People vs. Nuevas (516 SCRA 463, 2007)
People vs. Dequina (640 SCRA 111, 2011)
People vs. Uyboco (640 SCRA 146, 2011)
g. Exigency
CASE:
People vs. De Gracia (233 SCRA 716, 1994)
i. Airport Security
CASES:
Martinez vs. People (690 SCRA 656, 2013)
Sales vs. People (690 SCRA 141, 2013)
People vs. Cadidia (707 SCRA 494, 2013)
j. Jail Safety
CASE:
People vs. Conde (356 SCRA 525, 2002)
4 | Page
People vs. Exala (221 SCRA 494, 1993)
Guanzon vs. De Villa (181 SCRA 623, 1990)
Abenes vs. CA (515 SCRA 690, 2007)
4. Wire Tapping
Republic Act No. 4200
CASE:
Gaanan vs. IAC (145 SCRA 112, 1986)
a. Exclusionary Rule
Article III, Section 3, Paragraph 2
CASE:
Stonehill vs. Diokno (20 SCRA 383, 1967)
Waiver
CASE:
Pastrano vs. CA (281 SCRA 254, 1997)
ANNOTATION:
Warrantless Arrest (283 SCRA 190)
Warrantless Arrest and Warrantless Search in Buy Bust (607
SCRA 830, 2009)
5 | Page
c. Waiver of Illegality of Arrest
CASE:
People vs. Racho (626 SCRA 633, 2010)
10. Privacy
Article III, Section 2
CASES:
Ople vs. Torres (293 SCRA 201, 1998)
In Re: Camilo Sabio (504 SCRA 704, 2006)
SJS vs. DDB (570 SCRA 410, 2008)
Lee vs. CA (625 SCRA 66, 2010)
Manila Electric vs. Lim (632 SCRA 195, 2010)
Fernando vs. St. Scho (693 SCRA 141, 2013)
In Re: Noriel Rodriguez (696 SCRA 390, 2013)
Hing vs. Choachuy (699 SCRA 667, 2013)
ANNOTATION:
Right to Privacy (293 SCRA 201)
Concept of Privacy Zones of Privacy
C. Content-based Restrictions
6 | Page
1. Some Tests of Validity of Contest-based Restrictions
Balancing of interest: The court must undertake the delicate and difficult
task of weighing the circumstances and appraising the substantiality of the
reasons advanced in support of the regulation of the free enjoyment of rights.
(American Communication Association vs. Doubs, 339 U.S. 383, cited
in Gonzales vs. COMELEC, 27 SCRA 835 [1969])
Direct incitement: The guarantees of free speech and free press do not
permit a state to forbid or prescribe the advocacy of the use of force or of law
violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing
imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.
(Brandenburg vs. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 [1969], cited in Salonga vs. Cruz
Pano, 134 SCRA 438 [1985])
ANNOTATION:
(301 SCRA 34)
7 | Page
CASES:
In Re: Published . . . (385 SCRA 285, 2002)
In the Matter - Macasaet (561 SCRA 395, 2008)
Lejano vs. People (638 SCRA 104, 2010)
Re: Letter of the UP Faculty (644 SCRA 543, 2011)
D. Content-neutral restrictions
O' Brien Test: A government regulation is sufficiently justified if it is within the
constitutional power of the government; if it furthers an important or substantial
governmental interest; if the governmental interest is unrelated to the suppression
of free expression; and if the incidental restriction on alleged freedom of
expression is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest.
(United States vs. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968), adopted, in Adiong vs.
COMELEC, 207 SCRA 712 [1992])
2. Freedom of Assembly
BP Blg. 880 (Public Assembly Act of 1985)
CASES:
Bayan vs. Ermita (488 SCRA 226, 2006)
Supreme Court Circular A.M. 98-7-02-SC
IBP vs. Atienza (613 SCRA 518, 2010)
4. Movies Censorship
CASES:
Gonzales vs. Kalaw Katigbak (137 SCRA 356, 1985)
Iglesia ni Cristo vs. CA (259 SCRA 52
5. Radio Broadcast
CASE:
Eastern Broadcasting Corp. (Dyre) vs. Dans (137 SCRA 647, 1985)
8 | Page
g. Freedom of Information
Article III, Section 7
CASES:
Neri vs. Senate (564 SCRA 152, 2008)
CPEG vs. COMELEC (631 SCRA 41, 2010)
Re: Request for Copy of 2008 SALN (672 SCRA 27, 2012)
ANNOTATION:
(299 SCRA 782)
A. Non-establishment Clause
The establishment clause prohibits (1) excessive governmental entanglement
with religious institutions and (2) government endorsement or disapproval of religion.
CASES:
Re: Request of Muslim (477 SCRA 648, 2005)
Taruc vs. Dela Cruz (453 SCRA 123, 2005)
Estrada vs. Escritur (408 SCRA 1, 2003)
(492 SCRA 1, 2006)
Soriano vs. Laguardia (587 SCRA 79, 2009)
(615 SCRA 254, 2010)
3. Tax Exemption
Article VI, Section 28, Paragraph 3
CASES:
Bishop of Nueva Segovia vs. Provincial Board (51 Phil. 352, 1927)
Tolentino vs. Secretary (235 SCRA 632, 1994)
1. Flag Salute
CASE:
Ebralinag vs. Division Sup't of Schools (219 SCRA 256, 1993)
9 | Page
Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers Union (59 SCRA 54, 1974)
SOURCE:
Miranda vs. Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 1966)
CASES:
Ho Wai Pang vs. People (659 SCRA 624, 2011)
Luz vs. People (667 SCRA 421, 2012)
PHILCOMSAT vs. Senate (673 SCRA 611, 2012)
People vs. Lara (678 SCRA 332, 2012)
People vs. Soriano (693 SCRA 214, 2013)
People vs. Ibaez (698 SCRA 161, 2013)
Tanenggee vs. People (699 SCRA 639, 2013)
ANNOTATION:
Extrajudicial Confession (649 SCRA 649, 2011)
1. Miranda rule not applicable to confessions executed before January 17, 1973
CASES:
People vs. Ribadajo (142 SCRA 637, 1986)
Filoteo vs. Sandiganbayan (263 SCRA 222, 1996)
Santos vs. Sandiganbayan (347 SCRA 386, 2000)
10 | P a g e
People vs. Sayaboc (419 SCRA 659, 2004)
People vs. Bagnate (428 SCRA 633, 2004)
a. Pre-Galit rule (January 17, 1973 to March 20, 1985)
7. What may be waived: The right to remain silent and to counsel, but not the right to be given
"Miranda warnings."
8. Exclusionary Rule
Article III, Section 12, Paragraph 3
CASES:
People vs. Andan (269 SCRA 95, 1997)
Marcelo vs. Sandiganbayan (302 SCRA 102, 1999)
People vs. Janson (400 SCRA 584, 2003)
11 | P a g e
Yap Jr. vs. CA (358 SCRA 564, 2001)
Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 213847, 2014)
5. Right to bail and right to travel abroad
CASES:
Manotok vs. CA (142 SCRA 149, 1986)
Santiago vs. Vasquez (217 SCRA 633
Silverio vs. CA (195 SCRA 760)
7. READ:
Annotation on Bail (260 SCRA 161)
Right to Bail (647 SCRA 613, 2011)
ANNOTATION:
Due Process (287 SCRA 314)
2. Presumption of Innocence
CASES:
Biraogo vs. Phil. Truth (637 SCRA 78, 2010)
Lejano vs. People (638 SCRA 104, 2010)
Del Castillo vs. People (664 SCRA 450, 2012)
People vs. Maraorao (674 SCRA 151, 2012)
ANNOTATION:
(569 SCRA 903)
12 | P a g e
6. Right to speedy, impartial and public trial
A. Speedy Trial
CASES:
Jacolo vs. Sandiganbayan (635 SCRA 94, 2010)
Mari vs. People (657 SCRA 414, 2011)
COCOFED vs. Republic (663 SCRA 514, 2012)
Villareal vs. People (664 SCRA 519, 2012)
B. Public Trial
CASE:
Garcia vs. Domingo (52 SCRA 143, 1970)
C. Impartial Trial
CASE:
Re: Request Radio-TV Coverage of the Estrada Plunder Case (360
SCRA 248, 29 June 2001 & 365 SCRA 62, 13 September 2001)
9. Trial in absentia
Rule 115, Section 1 (c)
CASES:
Gimenez vs. Nazareno (160 SCRA 1, 1988)
Parada vs. Veneracion (269 SCRA 371, 1997)
Bernardo vs. People (G.R. No. 166980, 4 April 2007)
13 | P a g e
Lumanog vs. People (630 SCRA 42, 2010)
People vs. Sandiganbayan (699 SCRA 713, 2013)
a. Transactional Immunity
Article XIII, Section 18, Paragraph 8
Republic Act No. 1379, Section 8
Republic Act No. 6832, Section 8 (Davide Commission)
NOTE:
Executive Order No. 1 "The Truth Commission"
4. Exclusionary Rule
Article III, Section 12, Paragraph 3
ANNOTATION:
(307 SCRA 116)
(682 SCRA 724)
14 | P a g e
Lozano vs. Martinez (146 SCRA 323, 1986)
Agbanlog vs. People (220 SCRA 530, 1993)
People vs. Nitafan (202 SCRA 726, 1992)
Vergara vs. Gedorio, Jr. (402 SCRA 520, 2003)
3. Acts which when done were innocent (Ex Post Facto Laws)
Article III, Section 22
CASES:
Kay Villegas Kami (35 SCRA 429, 1970)
Salvador vs. Mapa (539 SCRA 37, 2007)
People vs. Casta (565 SCRA 341, 2008)
Nasi-Villar vs. People (571 SCRA 202, 2008)
B. What punishments cannot be imposed
1. Involuntary Servitude
Article III, Section 18, Paragraph 2
CASE:
Sarmiento vs. Tuico (162 SCRA 676, 1988)
2. Excessive Fines
Article III, Section 19, Paragraph 1
CASES:
People vs. Dela Cruz (92 Phil. 906, 1953)
People vs. Dacuycuy (173 SCRA 901, 1989)
Agbanlog vs. People (220 SCRA 530, 1993)
ANNOTATION:
Death Penalty (297 SCRA 822)
4. Indefinite Imprisonment
CASE:
People vs. Dacuycuy (173 SCRA 90, 1989)
15 | P a g e
3. Other Cases:
Jacolo vs. Sandiganbayan (635 SCRA 94, 2010)
Ivler vs. Modesto-San Pedro (635 SCRA 191, 2010)
Flores vs. Montemayor (651 SCRA 396, 2011)
People vs. CA (660 SCRA 323, 2011)
Ysidoro vs. Leonardo-De Castro (665 SCRA 89, 2012)
Bautista vs. Cuneta-Pangilinan (684 SCRA 521, 2012)
Braza vs. Sandiganbayan (691 SCRA 471, 2013)
E. Affirmative Rights
a. WRIT OF AMPARO:
A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC of 25 September 2007 as amended on 16 October
2007
CASES:
Tapuz vs. Del Rosario (554 SCRA 768, 2008)
Canlas v. Napico (554 SCRA 209, 2008)
Secretary of Defense vs. Manalo (568 SCRA 1, 2008)
Reyes vs. CA (606 SCRA 580, 2009)
So vs. Tacla (633 SCRA 563, 2010)
Manila Electric vs. Lim (632 SCRA 195, 2010)
Lozada vs. Arroyo (670 SCRA 545, 2012)
Navia vs. Pandico (673 SCRA 618, 2012)
Saez vs. Arroyo (681 SCRA 678, 2012)
Ladaga vs. Mapagu (685 SCRA 322, 2012)
De Lima vs. Gatdula (691 SCRA 226, 2013)
16 | P a g e
Pador vs. Arcayan (693 SCRA 192, 2013)
In Re: Noriel Rodriguez (696 SCRA 390, 2013)
ANNOTATION:
Writ of Amparo (605 SCRA 642, 2009)
Consti 2 Syllabus
Atty. Montejo
17 | P a g e