Introduction

The Indian aerospace and defence (A&D) marketplace is among the most striking all
comprehensive and the administration wants to use this so as to progress interests in the area.
India is placed among the ten main nations on the planet as far as military inflow is
considered. It has set up itself as a major transporter of defence hardware. India apportions
around 1.8% of its total GDP on the spending of Defence requirements, of which 40% is in
capital acquisitions. Even with the items regarding the defence sector which are produced
locally, there is a huge import segment at both structure and sub-structure levels. (More than
50%). Just around 30% of equipment is produced in India, these are mostly by public sector
undertakings. India's defence sector, which was reserved for public sector, was unlocked in
2001 for Indian private sector with the support of FDI permissible up to 26%, both subject to
permitting to empower the private segment to take an interest in defence production inside
the nation. According to current statistics, the foreign supplier is gratified to balance 30% of
the contract value, or 50% in extension ventures, for instance, the MMRCA fighter contract,
through local sub-contracts. The policy is however not successful in achieving any important
budgetary or mechanical inflows, mainly due to the absence of motivations in the scheme for
outside financial investors. Remembering this and with the goal to welcome venture and
technology and create budding defence manufacturing to make India self-sufficient, the
Union Cabinet recently brought the FDI cap in defence manufacturing up to 49% under the
government endorsement path. FDI beyond 49% will be permitted on a case-to-case premise
where there is access to modern state of the art technology and will be liable to endorsement
from the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), subject to specific conditions. An extension
in the FDI cap up to 100 percent would be legitimate, rather than a settled cap based strategy,
which might be a required to desirable inflows.(Self-reliance in defence production , 2016)
(Business Capital)
 Year Developments

2001 Defence sector open to private sector industry

26%FDI

2002 Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) created

Buy category introduced

2003 Buy and make category with ToT introduced

2004 Kelkar committee constituted for revision of defence procurement

policy and participation of private sector

2005-2009 Defence offset policy formulated(2005) and Defence Offset

Facilitation Agency(DOFA) created
Make & Buy and Make Indian categories introduced

2011 Offset scope enhanced to include aerospace and internal security

July 17th FDI increased to 49%

2013
Need for FDI in defence
Defence sector is highly capital intensive and undergoes rapid obsolescence of technology.
FDI is not just getting funds, but access to the latest technologies. Increased FDI will reduce
the corruption in Indian defence. This can lead to significant development in quality and
quantity of defence equipment and proper growth in economic sector. Higher FDI will
enhance defence industry skills and also increase employment of skilled people in India. It
brings trade balance and increases liquidity by the way of foreign exchange reserves. As a
result the national GDP will increase due to higher FDI in defence manufacturing. Currently
India is the largest importer of defence equipments. Allowing FDI in defence can reduce this
to an extent.

The foreign vendors are not comfortable with transferring proprietary technology to a
company with barely 26 per cent ownership, they need to have incentives and assurances to
mitigate risks. Given the scale of private companies in India, cap of 26 per cent prevents large
investments. India faces significant challenges in protecting its territory and its citizens, the
need for greater foreign technological and infrastructural assistance to develop indigenized
capability are critical. Considering all these factors we can understand that a higher FDI in
defence manufacturing is needed.
International joint ventures

L&T and EADS JV for building defence systems for electronic warfare
Rolta India renews partnership with Intergraph Corp in defence security
Three joint ventures by different Tata companies with foreign majors
European naval systems major DCNS announces Indian venture
Vectra Group forms JV with Russian truck maker Kamaz
Problems in permitting higher FDI (Demerits)

The primary concern is that allowing greater FDI will reduce Indias control over a
security sensitive sector. Raising the ceiling from 26% to 49%, makes no fundamental
difference to the control majority Indian partner holding 51%.
Raising the FDI cap will marginalise DPSUs, ordnance factories and the private sector
and potentially crowd out Indias domestic industry

Indirect economic control of companies over FDI in Indian Industries

Authorities dealing with FDI

Approval from RBI (Reserve Bank of India).

Permission from FIPB (Foreign Investment Promotion Board).
Permission from SIA (Secretariat for Industrial Assistance).
Permissi0on from FIIA (Foreign Investment Implementation Authority).
Investment Commission.
Project Approval Board.

Policy on FDI in defence manufacturing in India

Defence Production Policy, 2011 has encouraged indigenous manufacturing of defence
equipment. Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) has been amended in 2016 to provide for
the following:

To encourage indigenous design, development and manufacturing of defence equipment

new category of capital procurement - Buy Indian IDDM (Indigenously Designed,
Developed and Manufactured) was introduced.

Preference to Buy (Indian-IDDM), Buy (Indian) and Buy and Make (Indian) over
Buy (Global) categories of capital acquisition.

Provision for Maintenance TOT (Transfer of Technology) to Indian Industry partners.

Provisions to allow foreign OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) to select Indian

Production agency.

Requirement of least indigenous substance has been upgraded.

'Services' as an alternative for releasing counterbalances have been re-presented
(Self-reliance in defence production , 2016)

Example for FDI in Defence manufacturing (Boeing Company)

On January 1, 2009, the administration of India obtained eight Boeing P-8I long-range
maritime reconnaissance and antisubmarine aircraft. The P-8I is a unique variation of the U.S.
Naval force's P-8A Poseidon. In June 2011, India's Ministry of Defence consented to an
arrangement with the U.S. government to obtain 10 Boeing C-17 Globe ace III airlifters. The
C-17 is the biggest defence contract marked by the Indian government with the US recently.
Boeing has presented a $300-million arrangement for investment in the Indian defence
industry as "offsets" for the four extra P8I long- range maritime patrol aircraft that India
planned to purchase for its naval force, a senior organization official has shown.

Present scenario of defence

Indias expenditure plan reached up to Rs229000 crore which was 12% high in the year 2014-
15 compared to the previous year, and thereby opened the area to foreign direct investment
(FDI). The capital spending reached from Rs89588 crore in February to Rs94588 crore.
Income budget of army Rs20665 crore
Income budget of navy Rs22312 crore
Income budget of air force Rs31818 crore
Income budget of DRDO Rs9298 crore
Income budget of OFB Rs1207 crore

The income budget of DRDO went up to 60% which was the largest hike in DRDOs history.
This takes R&D in the defence sector to Rs15283 crore, nearly 7% of the Rs229000
crore defence budget. DRDO, which has been getting about 5% of the defence budget, has
long pleaded for 7-8%.The capital distribution for the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB), which
will be utilized for modernizing the service's system of 41 industrial amenities that make
arms, ammunition and hardware for the military, was multiplied. This system, dispensed Rs
1,000 crore, is intended to encourage the fast move of substantial equipment from
cantonments in the inside to fringe ranges. Under this venture, various meter gage lines will
be moved up to wide gage. The tri-benefit "joint staff" home office is the other receiver of this
Budget, with its title raised to Rs1029 crore from Rs829 crore in February.
(2016) (Livemint, 2017) (Business standard, 2014)

Political-legal policy issues

Technology Transfer: A particularly mind boggling and questionable issue as western

countries like US, France trade innovation for making countries which have strong
affirmation of Intellectual property rights (IPR). India is still weak on this point of view
however more grounded enactments concerning this issue will upgrade the move of
advancement in Defence acquisitions. Hence, more grounded confirmation of the benefits of
IPR of development merchants is advocated.

Low public responsibility of defence establishments:

 In India, despite the point that there are institutional structures, for instance, self-
sufficient associations like Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Controller and
Auditor General (CAG) to check disgrace, frail institutional system for institutional
securing remains a loophole.
It is expected to acquire responsibility and clarity of securing arrangements.
Corruption: Debasement in defence weaponry assembly procurement bargains owing
essentially to nonappearance of straightforwardness and authentic oversight by Ministry of
Defence before and likewise the current chopper entryway trap just shows how
straightforward the Indian Defence industry is .In 2015, India got a "D" order exhibiting high
frailty to contamination in protection bargains according to hostile to defilement guard dog
Transparency International (TI) in its report about defend straightforwardness for the Asia
Pacific district. This is one of the genuine obstructions with reference to why the Indian
assurance industry is not progressing in the right course.

(Self-reliance in defence production , 2016)

Offsets

Offset, in artistic sense, is an element that offsets remunerates a demonstration. In defence

procurement context, it is a component of "compensation" made by the producer that
generally happens through putting a base for each penny of significant worth expansion in the
requesting nation. Defence offset signifies "a provider places work to a concurred an incentive
with firms in the purchasing nation, far beyond what it would have gotten the nonattendance
of the counterbalance." Thus under defence offset, a foreign provider of gear consents to
fabricate a given percent of his item (as far as esteem) in the purchasing nation. Once in a
while this may happen with technology transfer.

The DPP 2006 commanded provider must outsource 30% with Indian organizations or make
investments in India for requests in excess of Rs 300 crore. It is estimated that by 2020,
EADS (European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company) alone will represent $1 billion
(Rs 4,800 crore) of outsourcing to India. Indian organizations can rake in $10 billion in the
following 4-5 years through the offset program. The defence service presented advancements
like 'offset banking', permitting organizations to save their offset credits. This will improve
the ability of the entire production network and giving access to higher technology and
worldwide markets

(Self-reliance in defence production , 2016)

Challenges

The private area does not have the ability to effectively retain and convey the quality
and volumes of offset work visualized.
The public sector and BRDs are additionally not completely adapted to put
considerable incremental foundation to get the technology and capacity under offsets.
Conclusion

India faces serious challenges in defending its territory and its citizens, the need for greater
foreign technological and infrastructural assistances to develop indigenized capability are
critical. Ensuring that the foreign defence investors will be able to generate sufficient
incentives from their investment, the FDI would increase substantially. Even though the FDI
cap has been recently increased, 49% was not enough in bringing investment and advanced
technology into the sector. In order to bring in inflow of capital and setting up of entities of
OEMs and their suppliers with transfer of technology (Business Capital)y, it is better to allow
either 100% or in case if it is not possible, at least a 74% FDI in the sector.

References
Business standard. (2014, july). Retrieved from http://www.business-
standard.com/article/economy-policy/fdi-in-defence-increased-to-49-
114071001148_1.html
(2016, june tuesday). Retrieved from https://thewire.in/90617/india-defence-
sector-fdi-wrap-up/
Self-reliance in defence production . (2016, june monday). Retrieved from
http://www.pwc.com
Livemint. (2017, august friday). Retrieved from
http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/lvBslknAbAKLLrTAxmPlpL/The-case-
against-higher-FDI-in-the-defence-sector.html
Business Capital. (n.d.). Retrieved from Self-reliance in defence production The
unfinished agenda. (2016, june monday). Retrieved from
http://www.pwc.com