Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PMCID:PMC3519039
doi:10.4103/09742700.102357
Hemorrhagicshock:Thephysiologyapproach
FabrizioGiuseppeBonanno
TraumaDirectorate,ChrisHaniBaragwanathHospital,Johannesburg,SouthAfrica
Addressforcorrespondence:Dr.FabrizioGiuseppeBonanno,Email:f.g.bonanno@gmail.com
Received2011Mar3Accepted2011Apr13.
Copyright:JournalofEmergencies,Trauma,andShock
ThisisanopenaccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionNoncommercialShareAlike3.0Unported,which
permitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited.
Abstract
Ashiftofapproachfromclinicstryingtofitphysiologytotheoneofphysiologytoclinics,with
interpretationoftheclinicalphenomenafromtheirphysiologicalbasestothetipoftheclinicaliceberg,anda
managementexclusivelybasedonmodulationofphysiology,isfinallysurgingasthesafestandmost
efficaciousphilosophyinhemorrhagicshock.ATLSclassificationandrecommendationsonhemorrhagic
shockarenothelpfulbecauseantiphysiologicalandpotentiallymisleading.Hemorrhagicshockneedstobe
reclassifiedinthedirectionofusefulnessandtimingofintervention:inparticularitsassessmentand
managementneedtobetailoredtophysiology.
Keywords:Classification,hemorrhagicshock,management
INTRODUCTION
IthasalwaysbeenpuzzlingtryingtounderstandandaccepttherationaleandbenefitsoftheATLS
classification[1]especiallyafterhavingreplacedHolcroftmoresensibleclassification,[2]asforthedifficulty
ofpracticalimplementationwithreferencetotimingandoptimalmanagement.Bothclassificationswere
consequencesofexperimentsdoneonanimalsthatdonothavethesameadrenergicreceptorsdistribution
andamountonhumans,whichfurthervariesfromindividualtoindividual,[3,4]andamisinterpretationof
Shiresstudiesinthe1960s,[5,6]deceptivelycorroboratedbytheimprovementinrenalfailurestatisticsinthe
Vietnamwarwiththeoverloadofcrystalloids,incidentalwithacoincidentalincreaseofARDS.[7,8]
Amoreusefulclassificationofhemorrhagicshock(HS),individualphysiologytailoredand
therapeutic/decisionmakingfriendly,whichisbasedontheabovetwoclassificationsofshock,hasbeen
elaborated.
CLASSIFICATIONOFHEMORRHAGICSHOCK
Classificationsaremeanttosummarizetheassessmentandmanagementofascenarioorofaproblem[
Table1].ATLSclassificationofhemorrhagicshock(HS)[1]isnotsensitiveandspecificenoughtohelp
decisionmakinginreferencetothetimingofmanagement,beingbasedonlyontheamountofbloodloss
thatmayormaynotberightlyestimated,anditisunhelpfulanddifficulttoapplytoo.[9]Theprevious
physiologicalclassification[2]hadadvantagesoverlookedandnotrecapturedbytheATLSone,namely
theprogressionoftheeffectsofahemorrhageonthedifferentorgansandsystems,amorereliableindicator
thantheamountofblooditselfinguidingtimingofintervention.Nevertheless,thephysiological
classification,despitebeingmorefunctionalandusefuldoesnotkeepinaccountthepreexistentdifferent
organphysiologicalreservesorcanforeseethelevelatwhichhypotension,crucialparametersignaling
decompensation,occurs.Byrecommendingthefluidloadof2Lcrystalloidsloadforadultpatientstotestthe
reliabilityofcompensatorymechanisms,asrecommendeduptorecently,classicalATLSguidelinesactually
delaythetimingofinterventionassourcecontrolwhentestingisnotrequiredandmorecruciallyendup
increasingtheongoingorspontaneouslystoppedbleeding.Theonlynoveltyoftheclassificationisthecutoff
at30%bloodlossaslevelofbloodlossalwaysmanifestingwithhypotension,persenotenoughuseful
informationtoguidedecisionmaking.
Thenewclassification[Table2],whichmaywellbecalledthe"physiologicalHSclassification"or
"therapeuticalHSclassification,isbasedonadecisionmakingthatkeepsinaccounthardpracticeandbasic
physiologicalconsiderations,suchasthesignificanceoffluidbloodresistanthypotensionandbodynatural
hemostaticmechanisms,therightdefinitionofshocknonethelesstherelevancethathemorrhagetriggeredIR
andSIRhaveincriticalillnessscenariosassecondaryinsultfromischemia.
Incriticalshock,infactthereisnomuchofcirculatingvolume,andbrainandheartinternalcirculationsare
barelyholdingasaresultofthesystemicvasoconstrictionfromchemoreceptorandcentralnervoussystem
receptorsstimulation,whileinsevereshockthereissufficientbloodvolumetopotentiallymaintain
perfusiondespiteendogenouscompensatorycapacityintermsofvasomotion/vasoconstrictionhasbeenlost
inmoderateshockcompensatorycapacityinsteadhasnotbeenlostandmildshockindicatesonlysome
bloodloss.
Thephysiologicaltherapeuticalclassificationmustbedistinguishedfromtheprognosticone,i.e.reversible
orirreversibleshockandimplicitlyphotographsthelevelsofshockwithinatimeframeofreversibility.It
mustalsonotbeconfusedwiththetwohitmodelofphysiologicaldeteriorationeither,whichdescribethe
timepeaksofclinicaldownfall.
RATIONALE:TIMINGOFINTERVENTIONTHERESUSCITATIONPARADOX
Timingiseverything.Themainstemoftreatmentofshockisremovalofthecausaprima(source
optimizationincardiogenicshock(CS),sourcecontrolinHS,andsourceeliminationininflammatoryshock
(IS).ThetimingfortreatmentofHScanbesummarizedinatherapeuticparadox:Intervenesooninavery
sickpatienttopreventdeathandacceptingtheinevitablecomplicationsimprovethehealthyormoderately
sickpatientbeforesurgerybyoptimizingorreinforcingpatientphysiologywithaviewtoreduceorprevent
complications.So,sickerthepatient,theearliermorerapidandaggressivetheinterventionhastobetheless
sickthepatientmoretimehastobetakenforimprovementbeforeintervention.Patientbiologicaland
physiologicalreserves(immunity,nutrition,exerciseandagerelatedcardiovascularreflexesandspecific
organshomeostaticautoregulatorycompensatorymechanisms),preexistingsystemicdiseasesor
derangements(chronicrenalfailure,hypertension,diabetes,chronicliverdisease,andchronicheartdisease),
andconcurrentdrugintake(alcohol,antihypertensive,antiarrhythmic,blockers,steroids,vasodilators,
inotrops,andinsulin)playdifferentsignificantrolesintheoverallprognosisofthecriticalillnessbydelaying
detection,limitingthephysiologicalreserveofthedifferentorgansandcomplicatingrecovery.
TimingofinterventionforsourcecontrolinHSdependsontheclinicalseverityanddegreeofcompensation
thatinnormalindividualsreflectsthelevelofbloodloss,andontheresponsetofluidsload.TBVis70ml/kg
bodyweightinadults,80ml/kgininfantageand8090ml/kginnewborns.HSattheextremesoflifeis
moreseriousthanattheageinbetweenasforthenotdeveloped(newbornsandinfants)orlessresponsive
(elderly)vascularreflexes.Elderlypatientsasamatteroffactcanhaveshockatseeminglynormalblood
pressureof120mmHgduetoatherosclerosis,hypertension,andlessfunctionalreflexesmaintaining
relativelyhighpressuresforperfusion.[10,11]
HSinpregnantwomendoesnotmanifestwithshocksignsuntil3035%TBVislostduetotheincreaseof
plasmaandcardiacoutput.Thesupinepositionneutralizestheadvantagesofthosepreparatorychangesto
forthcomingintravascularvolumelossesasfortheuteruscompressingontheIVCandimpairingVR,
phenomenonavoidablebyalwaysmaintainingaleftobliquepositioningwhenlyingdown.
Acutebloodlossandhypotensionwithbrainandheartdisturbancesorabloodloss>40%ofTBV(critical
HS,unstablyunstable)requirestandbysurgerytostopbleedingpersistinghypotensionnotrespondingto
bloodorfluidsload(severeshock)withstablenormalizationofsystolicandreversedHRtrend(stably
unstable),alsorequiresemergencysurgerytostopbleeding.
Heartandbraincirculationincriticalshockareholdingbecauseofstillfunctionalregionalvasomotion,but
theyhavealreadypassedthecriticalextractionpointasbydefinitionischemicsignsarealreadypresent.
Noresponsetosmallvolumesofhypertonic/colloidfluidloadinsevereshocksignifiesaderanged
vasomotionduetolossofendogenouscompensationasthebeginningofaphysiologicalslopewith
continuinghemorrhageatarateinwhichreflexcompensatoryvasoconstrictioncannotmaintainpressures.
Anythingelseotherthanafastruntotheaterandswiftanesthesiainductionwillkillpatientsintheabovetwo
scenarios.Topushextrafluidsfastoringreatquantitywilldisruptthebalancebycounteractinglifesaving
hypotension,vasoconstriction,vesselretraction,andclotformation,withtheendresultofkillingthepatient
orinthelesspessimisticscenariocausingheartattackoracerebrovascularaccident.[12]
Themechanismsaccountingfortheworseningofthesituationbeforeorintheabsenceofsourcecontrolin
criticalandsevereHSaremultipleandactincombinationevolvinginaviciouscircleofacceleratedexitus.
ThechemoreceptorresponsetolowPaO2atlevelsofpulsepressureof7080mmHgincreasesBPbydirect
stimulationofthevasomotorcentersinthereticularactivatingsubstanceofthemedullaoblongataandlower
pons,increasingarteriolestoneviasympatheticnervoussystemstimulation.Atsomestage,withoutorbefore
sourcecontrolandinthepresenceofsupplementaryfluidsandoxygenorhyperoxia,thevasoconstricting
reflexgetsdampenedeventually,withHbO2reducedtominimaltermsfromtheunarrestedbleedingandCO
reducedfromthedecreasedvenousreturn,andwithdissolvedPaO2thatcannotsustainCaO2atalevelto
maintainsufficientperfusion(DO2),thereflexgetstriggered.Bythetimethechemoreceptoristriggered
though,HbO2willhavereachedminimallevels,andsotheDO2,andbrainandheartarealreadysufferingof
relativehypoxia(criticalshock).CoronarieshaveaveryhighO2ERatbasalconditions(75%vs.25%of
mostoftheotherorgans)andarealreadyinpathologicalsupplydependenceincriticalshock,dangerously
nearthecriticalextractionlevelbeyondwhichanaerobicmetabolismandpotentiallydevastatingfurther
ischemiaensues.[13]Adjunctivehyperoxiawillparadoxicallyacceleratethephysiologicalslope,particularly
ifcombinedwithbloodorfluidsincreasingbleedingratebeforesourcecontrol.
Asimportantly,theischemicCNSresponsetopressures<60mmHgwithdecreasedDO2delivery,as
signaledbyanalreadyclinicallyimpalpablelevelofsystolicpressure,wouldalsobecounteractedbyfluid
administrationwiththeparadoxofhavingasituation,otherwisekeptcompensatedbythetworeflexes,being
insteaddecompensatedbyfluidsandoxygenadministration.
Moreover,theincreaseofintravascularvolumeswithfluidtransfusionbeforesourcecontrolpreviously
advisedwouldfurtherdecreaseperfusionasitcounteractsthethreenaturalphysiologicalmechanismsof
hemosthasis,i.e.arterialretraction/spasm,hypotension,andclot,endingupincreasingbleedingand
decreasingpressures.
SinceWorldWarIinfactithasbeenknownthat:hypotension,vasoconstriction,vesselretraction,andclot
formationpreventedcontinuationofbleedingafterwoundingbloodorplasmatransfusionbeforesurgery
wasawastedresourcethatcouldcauserebleedingandsurgerywithcontrolofhemorrhagewasthemost
effectiveresuscitation.Theinsightofwarsurgeryexperiencehadtoldusthathypotension,clotformation,
andvesselsretractionwerethereasonsforpatientssurvivalafterarterialdamageorinjury,thatanuntreated
arterialinjuryorkilledrapidlyorwassavageableifspontaneouslystopped,whileavenousinjuryhadtorely
onlyonclotformationtostop.Thisimplies,paradoxically,thatmajorvenousinjurycanbemorelethalthan
arterialoneinsitessuchasmediastinumandretroperitoneumwhereitcannotbecompressed.[1417]
Thus,pushingfluidsandhyperoxiaandthemaintenancethoughtemporaryoftheactualmeanarterial
pressure(MAP)incriticalshockandsevereshockbeforesourcecontrol,isinprincipleanddefacto
deleterioustopatient'sphysiologyandoutcome.Delayandstandardresuscitationwithoxygenandfluids
willparadoxicallyresultinanearlierischemiaofthetwoorgansthantheonethatwouldoccurifno
transfusionandearlysurgerywereinsteadimplemented.
Thefluidloadtestisconsequentlyawastefulanddamagingexerciseincriticalhemorrhagicshockasisany
delaytofastsourcecontrol.
Inallothercasesofhypotensiveshockwithnoheartorbrainischemiathefluidloadtestshouldbecarried
outasittellsusonthestatusofcompensationpresentand,importantly,allowsdistinctionbetweensevere
andmoderateshock,i.e.betweenarushtotheaterortemporizingonfurtherdiagnosticortherapeutic
strategies.Hypotensiveshockwithoutheartorbraininvolvement,independentlywhetherthelossis20%
(notalwaysaccompaniedbyhypotension)or30%(alwaysaccompaniedbyhypotension)ofTBV,which
respondstoblood/fluidsoverloadtestwithnormalizationofbloodpressureandreversetrendintachycardia
(moderateshock),indicatesreliablythepresencestillofacertainphysiologicalreserveintermsof
compensatorymechanisms.Suchscenariosdonotrequireimmediateorrapidsurgerybutcanbeinvestigated
beforesurgeryorinterventionalradiologyandconsideredforconservativemanagement.Noinvestigation
shouldbeentertainedinthepresenceofcriticalorsevereshock.
Investigationsshouldbeallowedonlyinnothypotensive,compensatedmildtomoderateHS,andshouldbe
aimedonlytoidentifytheoriginofthebleeding/sandconcomitantpathologiesworthyoressentialtobe
pickedupbeforesurgery.History,clinicalassessment,logisticsandequipmentdictatethetimingof
interventionandinvestigationsincompensatedshockorconsiderationforconservativenotoperative
management.Bloodtransfusioninthesenotemergencycasesshouldbegivenwithinmaximum46hfrom
insulttopreventIRcomplications,tillaleveljudgedsatisfactory(Hb7g/dLwithHct>2124%)in
healthypatientsand910mg/dLwithHct2730%incardiacpatients,keepinginaccountSvO2minimal
levelsof70%,andnormalizedvaluesofBEandLAintheabsenceofinfection.[18,19]
ModerateHSrespondswelltocrystalloidsandPRBCi.v.mildshockcanbetreatedwithoralfluids,ori.v.
fluids.
Forstabilizationtobeconsideredestablished,besidesnormalBPandreverseornormalpulse,patientsmust
beseenwithnormalorimprovedcomplexion,mentalstatus,urinaryoutput,andcomfortingindirectsignsof
perfusionsuchasPaO2andSaO2.
PITFALLSINHEMORRHAGICSHOCKRESUSCITATION
Theloadingfluidtestof2LofcrystalloidspreviouslyrecommendedbyATLSwasdefacto
antiphysiologicalanddeleteriousespeciallywhenindiscriminatelyimplementedanddidnotbringincreaseof
survival,[20]butanincreaseinmortalityandpostoperativecomplicationswhencomparedtonofluidsor
lessfluidsresuscitation.[2124]Experimentalevidenceconfirmedthedeleteriouseffectsofthecrystalloid
bolus.[25,26]
Atnormalheartconditionsandhealthyvalvesandmyocardium,anyincreaseofvenousreturnwill
effectivelyincreaseMAPwhichwillincreaseactualbleedingbycounteractinghypotension,the
physiologicalvasoconstriction,andtheclottingattempts,whicharethethreenaturalmechanismsthe
organismusestostophemorrhage.Vasodilatationanddecreasedviscosityfromhemodilutionalsotriggerthe
samechainofevents,leadingtoincreased,continuousorrecurrentbleeding.Theseconsiderationsand
observationsweretestedinanimals,[2536]humans,[2022,37,38]andcomputersimulations[39]and
confirmedthat(i)toomuchfluidinfusioncauseshemodilutionofplateletsandclottingfactors,increaseof
bloodpressure,decreaseofbloodviscosity,vasodilatation,allfactorsthusleadingtoablowoutofthe
hemostaticplugwithaccentuationofongoinghemorrhageor/andsecondaryhemorrhage(ii)bloodloss
causeshypothermia,whichcausescoagulopathy(iii)inpatientswithpenetratingtrunkinjuryand
hypotensionanduncontrolledvascularinjury,ifnofluidsinstandardfashionaregiveninprehospitalsetting
beforetheater,survivalisincreased,complicationsdecreasedandhospitalstayshortenedcomparedto
standardfluidresuscitation(iv)surgicalhemosthasisisthekeytherapeuticactforuncontrolledhemorrhage
and(v)limitedormoderateresuscitationissuperiortoaggressiveresuscitationinuncontrolledvascular
injury.Samehemodynamicandhemostasisderangementsoccurifhypertonicsalineinsteadofcrystalloidsis
used[Figure1].[2527,30,3334,36]
Moreover,theprinciplefirstcrystalloidsthenblood,evenworseina3:1ratio,wasbasedontheassumption
thatnoncorpuscolatedplasma,thefluidpartofplasma,hasfirsttoreplacetheinterstitialintracellularshifts
occurringduringhemorrhage.Shiresstudies[5,6]wereaccurateontheassessmentoffluidsshifts,notinthe
waytomanagethem.Thehomeostasisofwaterbidirectionallyinthecellinterstitiabloodpathwayswillbe
obviouslyderangedinnotcompensatedshockwherebydefinitionthegrasponmaintainingbloodpressure
byarteriolarvasoconstrictionfailsandtheratiosintheStarlingequilibriuminthecapillariesdefault.Itis
intuitivethatonlybyrestoringvasoconstrictioncapacitytheshiftscanreoccur.Thisassumptionwasmissed
whenthe3:1ratiowaspostulatedastherightone,confirmingtheneedtocategorizeshockforany
experimentorstudyinamorephysiologicalmanner.TherealmessagefromShiresworksisthat
replenishmenttobeeffectiveandaccuratecanonlybedoneaftersourcecontrolwherethesolutionof
continuityisrepairedandcompensatoryphysiologyrestored.Onlythenfluidsinfusionwillequilibratethe
threefluidcompartments.Itistruethatcombinationsofcrystalloids,plasma,andbloodintheVietnamwar,
increasedsurvivalanddecreasedrenalfailureatexpensesofARDS(formerDaNanglung),butthatcannot
beattributedtothecombinationfluidsblood3:1morethatitcanbeattributedtobloodonly.[7,8]Theratio
3:1isnotonlyinaccurateinitsconception,amountandpriorityoftransfusionbutalsoforitsindiscriminate
use,i.e.whethershockiscompensatedandwithorwithoutsourcecontrol.Moreover,patientsselectionwas
notdoneintermsofcategorizingthemwithdifferentclassesofshockandthedecreaseofrenalfailureis
likelytohaverepresentedanaturalselectionoccurredinsurvivorswithnotcritical/severeshockcases,
eventuallysomeofthemevolvinginARDS.Besidesthenegativeeffectsonbleedingandonviscosityof
microcirculation,theclassicalapproachdoesnotmakesenseintuitivelyeither.Ifbloodlossistheprimitive
derangement,itisexpectedbloodreplacementtobethemainandmostimportantcorrectiveaction.Inother
words,bloodshouldbegivenfirstandcrystalloidsshouldfollowoncethefluidcomponentoftheplasma
shiftstowardinterstitialintracellularspacesandincreasesbloodhematocrit.[40]Theinfusionofcrystalloids
wouldthenreplacethelostintravascularcomponentandrestorehematocrit.Itissimpledeductionthatunless
thereisalossofcontinuityleftunrepairedinthecirculationsystem,whichisaclosedsystem,anyfluidshift
fromcellstointerstitiatointravascularspacewouldbereversedintheoppositedirectionbyreproducingthe
dynamicsbackwards(ClaudeBernardhomeostasisconcept).Inhemorrhageitisbloodthatislostandblood
needstobereplaced,atleasttominimumphysiologicallevelswhenbloodlosstrespassesthem.Anindirect
advantageofthisshiftofpolicywouldbetheshorteningoftimeofclotformationcomparedtothefirstfluids
thenbloodcurrentpolicythathasdominateddecadesofpracticeintraumawithdeleteriouseffects.[41]
InhypotensiveshockRinger'slactateshouldthereforebeusedonlyafterbloodorbloodcomponentstherapy
inanamounttailoredtobalanceosmolalityelectrolytesandhemathocrit.
AnotherdrawbackofanexcessoffluidtransfusionisRV/LVcardiacfailureorCSifthetwohalvesofthe
hearthavepreexistentdecreasedfunctionalreserveduetovalvularormyocardialpathology.Two
problemswouldthenbefacedoverloadandlowcardiacoutputwithtreatmentofoneconditionworsening
theotherone[Figure2].Directinotropicsupportwouldthenberequiredinconjunctionwithblood
replenishmentandaggressiveICUmonitoringofthecardiacoutput.
Furthermore,excesstreatmentwithfluidorbloodoverloadisdeleteriouswhetheriseffectedbeforesource
controlorafterwards,asitmaycausesecondaryintraabdominalcompartmentsyndrome,[4244]with
changesthattriggerasecondhitSIRorIRsyndromesandALIhelpedbySIRandvasodilatation,if
resuscitationisdonelate,orworsenedbyvasoconstrictionwithseriouseffectsonabdominalorgans
perfusion,ventilation,kidneyfunctionandvenousreturn,ifresuscitationisdoneearlyandinexcess.Gut
edemaandincreasedintraabdominalpressuretillabdominalcompartmentsyndromelevelwillensue,duethe
increaseofcapillarynetfiltrationpressure(cNFP)secondarytoincreasedintracapillarypressureresultofthe
increasedpressureupstreamfromincreasedvolume.Starlinglawrulingthepermeablecapillariesnet
filtrationpressurestates:NFP=[capillarypressure(interstitialfluidpressure+plasmacolloidosmotic
pressure)+interstitialfluidcolloidosmoticpressure].
InadequateordelayedresuscitationistheothersideofinappropriatetreatmentofHS.Cardiacarrestcan
occurasaprimaryhitforinsufficientvenousreturnandcoronaryischemiaduetothedependenceof
coronaryperfusionfrombloodflowduringthediastolephase,whichisdecreasedfollowingthedecreaseof
thestrokevolume.Thecompensatorytachycardiaonlyworsensthesituationacceleratingheartischemia.
PostHSSIRorIRphenomenonisthesecondseriousconsequenceofinadequateordeficientresuscitation
leadingtoincreasedmorbidityandmortality.[45,46]
STRATEGIESANDTACTICS
Adjunctsintreatment
CompensationofHSoccursbyreflexarteriolarvasoconstrictionsympatheticmediatedwithcatecholamines
actingon1receptors.Atsomestagehyporeactivitytoendogenouscatecholaminesinstalls,signaling
decompensation,whichbecomesparalysiswhenacompletelackofresponsivenessoccursevento
exogenousvasoconstrictorssignalingirreversibleshock.
Besidesitsprovenbenefitsinsepticshock(SS),vasopressinaliasargininevasopressin(AVP)aliasanti
diuretichormone(ADH)hasshownbeneficialeffectsinCSandincardiacarrest.[4751]InHSAVPhas
beenfoundtoreducethefluidrequirementandimproveneurologicaloutcomeandcardiopulmonary
parameters.[52]Vasopressinasbolus(0.4Uonceortwice)and/orinfusion(0.040.1U/min)reverses
intractableorprolongedhypotensioninthelatephaseHSorintraoperativeHSwithandwithoutcardiac
arrest.[5359]VasopressinvasoconstrictiveeffectresultsfrominhibitionofKATPchannelsandinhibitionof
nitricoxideinducedaccumulationofcGMP.Replacementofdepletedstoresofvasopressininthe
neurohypophysismayalsocontributetoreversalofshock.[60]ADHmaycauseproblemsathigherdosages
orwhengivenforseveralhours.[61]
Noradrenaline(NE)isapotentalphaadrenergicagonistwithminimaladrenergicagonisteffects.NE
increasesMAPduetoitsvasoconstrictiveeffectswithlittlechangeintheheartrateandstrokevolume,and
bydoingsoincreasesindirectlythecardiacoutputaswell.DosesofNEgoingfrom0.2g/kg/mintitratedto
responseupto3.3g/kg/minareusedtomaintainCOandBP.Itsdrawbacksareanincreaseofworkload
andoxygenconsumptionpluscoronaryvasoconstriction.NEshouldbeusedearlyasneurohormonal
augmentationtherapysupportinghemodynamicfunction,ratherthanasalaterescuetherapytotreatshock.
[62]
BothNEandADHcombinedwithhydroxyethylstarchimprovecerebralperfusionpressure,oxygenation
andmetabolisminHS,withAVPbeingthefasterofthetwo.[63,64]ThecombinationAVP+NEisan
effectivetreatmentforuncontrolledHSattheearlystageafterhemostasis,ifbloodisunavailable.[65]
NEshouldbeaddedtoAVPifthelatterisineffective,andmustbediscontinuedbeforeADH.[66]
LikewiseinSS,thecombinationoflowdosesNEandADH,orADHonitsown,canbeadministeredfrom
presentationandcategorizationofcriticalorsevereHStillbeforesourcecontrolasavasoconstriction
maintaining,vasomotorcollapsedelaying,drug.
Oncearterialpressureisbroughttoasystolicofatleast90mmHgandaMAP>6570mmHg,andCOstill
wouldbelow,intravenousdobutaminemaytakeover.Innormalheartsthereishoweverscarceneedfor
inotropicsupportinthepostoperativeICUphase.
Dopaminemayalsobeusefulinpatientswithcompromisedsystolicfunction,lowCO,andMAP.Atdoses
ofapproximately1020g/kg/min,theprevailingadrenergiceffectleadstoarterialvasoconstrictionand
elevationinbloodpressure.Theproblemwithdopaminehoweveristhatbeforethecardiovascularsystem
respondstovasoconstrictinghighdosagesithastopassthroughlowandmediumconcentrationsthatmay
temporarilyworsenthesituationbyincreasingtheheartrateandregionalvasodilatationinamomentwhere
thereisnotmuchbloodincirculationfurthermoredopaminepredisposestodysrhythmias.
Titratedhypotensiveresuscitation
Toolate,toolittle,tooearlytoomuch,toolateandtoomuchareallharmfulresuscitationstrategies.To
whichlevelthenshouldresuscitationbemaintainedbeforeimminentsurgeryortemporarilybeforesurgeryor
astheonlytreatmentifaconservativenonoperativeapproachisadopted?Thisshouldbealevelofblood
pressuresufficientenoughtomaintainperfusionwithoutriskingeithercontinuationofbleedingorre
bleeding.ThesetargetsarereachedwithTitratedHypotensiveResuscitation[Table3].
HypotensiveresuscitationisanoldconceptintroducedbyCannonaroundtheFirstWorldWar,[1417]but
implementedonlybyCrawfordinlate1980sforthetreatmentofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmbefore
surgery,[38]recentlyreintroducedas"permissiveortitratedhypotension"bytheIsraeliDefense
Force[67,68]fortransportedpatientswithHSwhereresuscitationmonitoringandtitrationaredifficultto
achieveandasmallvolumeofinfusionislogisticallyconvenient.Thesystolicpressurewaskeptlessthan90
mmHgtomaintainaconsciousnessleveloratthepalpablepulselevel,i.e.70and<90mmHgbytitrated
prnhourlybolusof250mlofRLorHTSskincomplexionandconsciousnessleveldirectresuscitationina
consciouspatient.
Thepresenceofassociatedheadinjurythatisnotmild(GCS12)compoundstheclinicalpicturebecause
ofthedifficultyorimpossibilitytouselevelofconsciousnessasanindicatorofthelevelofbloodlossand
compensatorymechanismsefficacy,andtheunpredictablelossofthecapacityofflowselfregulation
followingtrauma.PatientswithHSandHIneedthereforeamoderateresuscitationinbetweenpermissive
hypotensionandstandardresuscitation,i.e.systolicof100mmHgparticularlyinviewofthefactthatthe
brainlosesitscirculationselfregulatorycapacityatvariablelevelsofHI.[69,70]
Experimentalevidenceandclinicalexperienceincivilianandmilitarysettinghaveshownbenefitsandsafety
ofbolusesof250mloffluids,whethercrystalloids,colloids,orhypertonicsalineatdifferentconcentrations,
aseffectiveandsafeinitialmanagementofpatientswithHS[67,68,7173]HTSshouldbegivennotmore
than250,maximum375,ml/htomaximizeitsmeritsanddiminishitsdrawbacksonbleedingbyinterference
withcoagulationandmoreimportantlyfollowingincreaseofpressureasdirecthemodynamiceffect.
Inarecentstudyonhumans,thenodifferenceofmortalityinpatientswhoreceivedeitherHTS7.5%
Dextran70at6%orHTS7.5%administrationbolusesof250mlcomparedtoNS0.9%250mlasinitial
fluidtreatmentbeforesourcecontrol,[74]associatedtoanincreaseofmortalityinthesubgroupwhodidnot
receivebloodtransfusioninthefirst24h,appearstocontradictsomeoftheconclusionsofprevious
experiences.Theinclusion,inthestudy,ofpatientsinHSwithSBP70mmHgorwithSBPbetween70
and90mmHg+HR110bpmwouldfittheprofileofcriticalandsevereshockcategoriesifbrainorheart
wereinvolvedandaknownloss<40%hadoccurred,ornoconsistentresponsetothefluidboluswasnoted
moreover,theobservationsmadeinthegroupwithnobloodtransfusionindicatepatientsinwhomtypeand
amountoffluidswouldnothavemadedifference.Thestudyonlyemphasizestheneedofamoreaccurate
andusefulcategorizationofHS.
Hypotensiveresuscitationandpermissivehypotensionondemandortitratedhypotension,more
accuratelyTitratedHypotensiveResuscitation(THR),remainstheidealresuscitationandthewaytogoas
standardinitialresuscitationparticularlyduringtransportofpatientswithcriticalorsevereHSindependently
onthescenario,whethercivilorruralormilitary.
Emergencyprotocols:Thephysiologyapproach
IncriticalshockwithaknownTBVlossof40%orthepresenceofbrainandheartischemicchanges
thereisnoproveneffectivestrategyofresuscitationoutofhospitalthatwouldnotcontemplateheroicslikein
situextremeoutdoorresuscitation(EOR)bysmalloperativeunitswithorwithoutsuspendedanimation
fastlyinducedhypothermiatechniques.SuchtechniqueswithportablefemorofemoralCPBP/ECMO
withouthypothermiahavegivendismalresultsoutdoorsinCAorCSbeforerefractoryCAinnormovolemic
notexhanguinatingpatientsevenwhenappliedwithbeatingheart,andasurvivalof2030%indoors.[7576]
IntraumascenarioswithsolutionofcontinuityinthevasculartreeanddecreasedbloodvolumeEORwith
themethodofsuspendedanimationcanonlybeeffectivewithhypothermiainducedbycoldsalineaortic
flushviaemergencysternotomy/thoracotomy.[77]
UntilmethodsandtechniquesofEORandsuspendedanimationhypothermiaareoptimizedorperfected,
onlythreeoptionsaresofaravailable.Oneisalifesavingruntothenearestmedicalfacilityforrapid
sourcecontrolwithcontinuousbloodtransfusionrunninginhighcapacity/flowcannulae,wellknowingitis
destinedtogetlost.Twoistorunatthenearestmedicalfacilitywithnofluidtreatmentwhatsoeveratall
leavingtothepatientnaturalbalancingmechanismstodotheirbestwithoutiatrogenicinterferenceuntil
rapid/swiftanesthesia/surgeryforsourcecontrol."Three"isTHR.Intheauthor'sviewnoresuscitationor
THRarethemostsensibleoptionstouseasinitialresuscitationbeforesourcecontrolinpatientswith
hypotensiveHSbothindoorandoutdoorwhilerushingonthewaytoamedicalfacility.Thenoresuscitation
optionmayindeedbethebestoption.[21]
THRshouldalsobeusedinsevereHSaftertheinitialbolusofthefluidloadtestdiscriminatesitfromthe
moderateoneifshockturnsouttobemoderatewithnormalizedsystolicandreversedtachycardiatrend,no
furtherfluidshouldbegivenuntilsourcecontrol.
WhichfluidtouseincriticalHSinprehospitalphaseandwhichfluidshouldbeusedforloadtestin
severeHS?
Itshouldbethefluidonewouldliketouseasbridgeinfusionuntilsourcecontrolifbloodwereunavailable:
hyperosmotichyperviscoussolutions(HHS),HTSorRLcombinedwithalginates,andconjugatedalbumin
solutionsappearsofartobeexcellentchoice.Thereisoverwhelmingevidenceontheimportanceof
maintainingmicrocirculationfunctionwithaimtooptimizeperfusioninHSbyusingaptfluidwithspecific
characteristicsandcomposition,particularlyviscositymorethancolloidosmoticandoncoticproperties,and,
inparallel,ontheirreplaceablefunctionofbloodfrommicrohemodynamicsandoxygentransportend
points.[7894]
ToshowpredictablebenefitsofTHRonmortalityandmorbidity,[85,95]specificallyinpreventingthe
installingofcrypticshockabuttinginaIRMOD/Sclinicalpictureinthepostoperativeperiod,trials[96]
shouldbedoneonpatientsinhypotensiveshockclassifiableassevereorcritical.[97]
Itisunderthesameprincipleoftheleastinterferencewithphysiologyduringresuscitationsthattacticsand
strategiessuchasTHR,damagecontrol,anddamagecontrolresuscitation,havebeenconceptualized.
Likewisegeneralanesthesiashouldtoobetitratedtopain/autonomicstimulationresponse(autonomic
controlledanesthesia)underthecomprehensiveconceptofphysiologyapproach.
Etomidate,S(+)ketamineoralfentanylinductionandS(+)ketamineorremifentanylcontinuousintravenous
anesthesia(CIVA)titratedtoresponseistheauthor'ssuggestedmethodforanesthetizingcriticalandsevere
shockpatients.[98100]
EmergencyprotocolsbasedonaPhysiologyapproachcomprehensivestrategy,i.e.theTherapeutical
ClassificationofHS,THR,exogenousvasoconstrictivesupport,autonomiccontrolCIVA,andblood
andbloodcomponentsreplenishment,[101108]aresuggestedinTables4and5.Inhypotensiveshock
Ringer'slactateshouldbeusedonlyafterbloodorbloodcomponentstherapyinanamounttailoredto
balanceosmolalityelectrolytesandhematocrit.
CONCLUSIONS
ThestandardATLSclassificationofHSisunhelpful,confusingandmisleadingasitfocusesontheamount
ofbloodlossinsteadofindividualphysiologicalresponsetohemorrhage,whichisthecorebydefinitionof
thederangementwecallshock.Anewclassificationwasneededandcenteredonphysiologylikethe
classicalclassificationofHolcroftemphasized.
Theeraofflatanestheticsandsurgeryisoveranditistimewegotowardatailoredtoindividualphysiology
restorationandreprioritizeallcriticalillnessmanagementfromthemicrocirculationstandpoint.
Fluidsasfirstmodalityoftreatment,particularlyinexcessasrecommendedtillrecently,aredeleteriousin
hypotensiveshockandshouldbeconsideredsecondlinemodalitymoreovershouldbegivenafterblood,
andinanamountbasedonadjustingosmolarity.
Exogenousvasoconstrictorsareavalidtherapeuticstrategyonceendogenousvasoconstrictionhasfailedto
maintainthegripontheflowcontrollingarterioles.
SavelifeistheCommandmentindecompensatedhypotensiveshocknotrespondingtofluidloadtestor
withacalculatedTBVloss>40%orwithbrainheartsignsofischemia,acceptinginevitableandobligatory
IRandaphaseofCrypticShock.
Preventcomplications,namelyIR,istheCommandmentincompensatedmildormoderateshock.
Playingwiththeenemyinitsownwayisthekeywordofthegame.Donotalterthephysiological
compensatorymechanismsbutkeepthemandreinforcethem.Letthebodyruntheorchestraandfollowit.
WithouttherightconvenientandphysiologicalclassificationofHS,wewillstillcontinuetogenerate
controversiesandcontradictoryinvestigatorappeasingresults.
Footnotes
SourceofSupport:Nil.
ConflictofInterest:Nonedeclared.
REFERENCES
1.KortbeekJB,AlTurkiSA,AliJ,AntoineJA,BouiloonB,BraselK,etal.Advancedtraumalifesupport,
8thedition,theevidenceforchange.JTrauma.200864:163850.[PubMed:18545134]
2.HolcroftJW,Shock.CurrentSurgicalDiagnosisandTreatment.In:DunphyJE,WayDL,editors.5thed.
LosAltos:LangeMedicalPublication1981.pp.172181.
3.AhlquistRP.Presentstateofalphaandbetaadrenergicdrugs.Theadrenergicreceptor.AmHeartJ.
197692:6614.[PubMed:10722]
4.NakaiK,ItakuraT,NakaY,NakakitaK,KameiI,ImaiH,etal.Thedistributionofadrenergicreceptors
incerebralbloodvessels:anautoradiographicstudy.BrainRes.1986381:14852.[PubMed:3756494]
5.ShiresT,ColnD,CarricoJ,LightfootS.Fluidtherapyinhemorrhagicshock.ArchSurg.196488:688
93.[PubMed:14107023]
6.DillonJ,LynchLJ,Jr,MyersR,ButcherHR.,JrThetreatmentofhemorrhagicshock.SurgGynecol
Obstet.1966122:96778.[PubMed:5933394]
7.ShiresGT,CarricoCJ,BaxterCR,GieseckeAH,Jr,JenkinsMT.Principlesintreatmentofseverely
injuredpatients.AdvSurg.19704:255324.[PubMed:5447113]
8.CerveraAL,MossG.Progressivehypovolemialeadingtoshockaftercontinuoushemorrhageand3:1
crystalloidreplacement.AmJSurg.1975129:6704.[PubMed:1130612]
9.GulyHR,BouamraO,LittleR,DarkP,CoatsT,DriscollP,etal.TestingthevalidityoftheATLS
classificationofhypovolaemicshock.Resuscitation.201081:11427.[PubMed:20619954]
10.RiceIR,KirkebyOJ.Effectofcerebralischemiaonthecerebrovascularandcardiovascularresponseto
haemorrhage.ActaNeurochir(Wien)1998140:699705.[PubMed:9781284]
11.MongeGarciaMI,CanoAG,RomeroMG.Dynamicarterialelastancetopredictarterialpressure
responsetovolumeloadinginpreloaddependentpatients.CritCare.201115:R15.[PMCID:PMC3222048]
[PubMed:21226909]
12.BonannoFG.Pitfallsinsurgicalresuscitation.MinervaChir.200257:936.[PubMed:11832865]
13.SchumackerPT,SamselRW.Oxygendeliveryanduptakebyperipheraltissues:physiologyand
pathophysiology.CritCareClin.19895:25569.[PubMed:2650817]
14.CannonWB,FrasenJ,CowelEM.Thepreventivetreatmentofwoundshock.JAmMedAss.
191870:61821.
15.ShaftanGW,ChiuCJ,DennisC,HarrisB.Fundamentalsofphysiologicalcontrolofarterial
hemorrhage.Surgery.196558:8516.[PubMed:5845188]
16.WangensteenSL,EddyDM,LudewigRM.Bleedingandbloodpressure.AmJSurg.1969118:4134.
[PubMed:5306992]
17.AssaliaA,ScheinM.Resuscitationforhaemorrhagicshock.BrJSurg.199380:213.
[PubMed:8443656]
18.DuttonRP,CarsonJL.Indicationsforearlyredbloodcelltransfusion.JTrauma.200660:S35S40.
[PubMed:16763479]
19.PaydarS,FazelzadehA,AbbasiH,BolandparvazS.Basedeficit:Abetterindicatorfordiagnosisand
treatmentofshockintraumapatients.JTrauma.201170:15801.[PubMed:21818003]
20.KaweskiSM,SiseMJ,VirgilioRW.Theeffectofprehospitalfluidsonsurvivalintraumapatients.J
Trauma.199030:12158.[PubMed:2213930]
21.BickellWH,WallMJ,PepePE,MartinRR,GingerVF,AllenMK,etal.Immediateversusdelayedfluid
resuscitationforhypotensivepatientswithpenetratingtorsoinjuries.NEnglJMed.1994331:11059.
[PubMed:7935634]
22.HeckbertSR,VedderNB,HoffmanW,WinnRK,HudsonLD,JurkovichGJ,etal.Outcomeafter
hemorrhagicshockintraumapatients.JTrauma.199845:5459.[PubMed:9751548]
23.CottonBA,GuyJS,MorrisJA,Jr,AbumradNN.Thecellular,metabolic,andsystemicconsequencesof
aggressivefluidresuscitationstrategies.Shock.200626:11521.[PubMed:16878017]
24.HumannB,LeferingR,TaegerG,WaydhasC,RuchholtzS,LendemansS.DGUTraumaRegistry.
Influenceofprehospitalfluidresuscitationonpatientswithmultipleinjuriesinhemorrhagicshockinpatients
fromtheDGUtraumaregistry.JEmergTrauma&Shock.20114:46571.[PMCID:PMC3214502]
[PubMed:22090739]
25.SolomonovE,HirshM,YahiyaA,KrauszMM.Theeffectofvigorousfluidresuscitationin
uncontrolledhemorrhagicshockaftermassivesplenicinjury.CritCareMed.200028:74954.
[PubMed:10752825]
26.KrauszMM,HirshM.Bolusversuscontinuousfluidresuscitationandsplenectomyfortreatmentof
uncontrolledhemorrhagicshockaftermassivesplenicinjury.JTrauma.200355:628.[PubMed:12855882]
27.GrossD,LandauEH,AssaliaA,KrauszMM.Ishypertonicsalinesafeinuncontrolledhemorrhagic
shock?JTrauma.198828:7516.[PubMed:3385816]
28.CaponeAC,SafarP,StezoskiW,TishermanS,PeitzmanAB.Improvedoutcomewithfluidrestrictionin
treatmentofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshock.JAmCollSurg.1995180:4956.[PubMed:8000655]
29.BickellWH,BruttigSP,WadeCE.Hemodynamicresponsetoabdominalaortotomyinanesthetized
swine.CircShock.198928:32132.[PubMed:2776283]
30.GrossD,LandauEH,KlinB,KrauszMM.Treatmentofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockwith
hypertonicsalinesolution.SurgGynObst.1990170:10612.
31.BickellWH,BruttigSP,MillnamowGA,OBenarJ,WadeCE.Thedetrimentaleffectsofintravenous
crystalloidsafteraortotomyinswine.Surgery.1991110:52936.[PubMed:1887377]
32.BickellWH,BruttigSP,MillnamowGA,OBenarJ,WadeCE.Useofhypertonicsaline/dextranversus
lactatedringer'ssolutionasaresuscitationfluidafteruncontrolledaortichemorrhageinanesthetizedswine.
AnnEmergMed.199221:107785.[PubMed:1381159]
33.KrauszMM,BarZivM,RabinoviciR,GrossD.Scoopandrunorstabilizehemorrhagicshockwith
normalorsmallvolumehypertonicsaline?JTrauma.199233:610.[PubMed:1635107]
34.MatsuokaT,WisnerDH.Resuscitationofuncontrolledliverhemorrhage:effectsonbleeding,oxygen
delivery,andoxygenconsumption.JTrauma.199641:43945.[PubMed:8810960]
35.RiddezL,JohnsonL,HahnRG.Centralandregionalhemodynamicsduringcrystalloidfluidtherapy
afteruncontrolledintraabdominalbleeding.JTrauma.199844:4339.[PubMed:9529168]
36.SukhotnikI,KrauszMM,BrodV,BalanM,TurkiehA,SiplovichL,etal.Divergenteffectsofoxygen
therapyinfourmodelsofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshock.Shock.200218:27784.[PubMed:12353931]
37.BlairSD,JanvrinSB,McCollumCN,GreenalghRM.Effectofearlybloodtransfusionon
gastrointestinalhaemorrhage.BrJSurg.198673:7835.[PubMed:3533203]
38.CrawfordES.Rupturedabdominalaneurysms.JVascSurg.199113:34850.[PubMed:1990175]
39.HirshbergA,HoytDB,MattoxKL.Timingoffluidresuscitationshapesthehemodynamicresponseto
uncontrolledhemorrhage:analysisusingdynamicmodeling.JTrauma.200660:12217.
[PubMed:16766964]
40.TakasuA,MinagawaY,AndoS,YamamotoY,SakamotoT.Improvedsurvivaltimewithcombined
earlybloodtransfusionandfluidadministrationinuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinrats.JTrauma.
201068:3126.[PubMed:20154543]
41.SpoerkeNJ,VanPY,DifferdingJA,ZinkKA,ChoSD,MullerPJ,etal.Redbloodcellsacceleratethe
onsetofclotformationinpolytraumaandhemorrhagicshock.JTrauma.201069:105461.
[PubMed:21068611]
42.ScheinM,WitmannDH,AprahamianCC,CondonRE.Theabdominalcompartmentsyndrome:the
physiologicalandclinicalconsequencesofelevatedintraabdominalpressure.JAmCollSurg.
1995180:74553.[PubMed:7773495]
43.KirkpatrickAW,BaloghZ,BallCG,AhmedN,ChunR,McBethP,etal.Thesecondaryabdominal
compartmentsyndrome:iatrogenicorunavoidable?JAmCollSurg.2006202:66879.[PubMed:16571439]
44.BaloghZ,MooreFA,MooreEE,BifflWL.Secondaryabdominalcompartmentsyndrome:apotential
threatforalltraumaclinicians.Injury.200738:2729.[PubMed:17109861]
45.CryerHG,LeongK,McArthurDL,DemetriadesD,BongardFS,FlemingAW,etal.Multipleorgan
failure:bythetimeyoupredictit,itisalreadythere.JTrauma.199946:597604.[PubMed:10217221]
46.DouzinasEE,AndrianakisI,LivaditiO,PrigourisP,PanerisP,VilliotouV,etal.Thelevelof
hypotensionduringhemorrhagicshockisamajordeterminantofthepostresuscitationsystemic
inflammatoryresponse:anexperimentalstudy.BMCPhysiol.200818:815.[PMCID:PMC2483989]
47.WenzelV,KrismerAC,ArntzHR,SitterH,StadlbauerKH,LindnerKH.Acomparisonofvasopressin
andepinephrineforoutofhospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation.NEnglJMed.2004350:10513.
[PubMed:14711909]
48.JollyS,NewtonG,HorlickE.Effectofvasopressinonhemodynamicsinpatientswithrefractory
cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarction.AmJCardiol.200596:16174.
[PubMed:16360345]
49.TreschanTA,PetersJ.Thevasopressinsystem:physiologyandclinicalstrategies.Anesthesiology.
2006105:599612.[PubMed:16931995]
50.KrismerAC,DnserMW,LindnerKH,StadlbauerKH,MayrVD,LienhartHG,etal.Vasopressin
duringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanddifferentshockstates:areviewoftheliterature.AmJCardiovasc
Drugs.20066:5168.[PubMed:16489848]
51.VoelckelWG,ConvertinoVA,LurieKG,KarlbauerA,SchochlH,LindnerKH,etal.Vasopressinfor
hemorrhagicshockmanagement:revisitingthepotentialvalueincivilianandcombatcasualtycare.J
Trauma.201069:S69S74.[PubMed:20622623]
52.SanuiM,KingDR,FeinsteinAJ,VaronAJ,CohnSM,ProctorKG.Effectsofargininevasopressin
duringresuscitationfromhemorrhagichypotensionaftertraumaticbraininjury.CritCareMed.200634:433
8.[PubMed:16424725]
53.RaedlerC,VoelckelWG,WenzelV,KrismerAC,SchmittingerCA,HerffH,etal.Treatmentof
uncontrolledhemorrhagicshockafterlivertrauma:fataleffectsoffluidresuscitationversusimproved
outcomeaftervasopressin.AnesthAnalg.200498:175966.[PubMed:15155342]
54.HaasT,VoelckelWG,WiedermannF,WenzelV,LindnerKH.Successfulresuscitationofatraumatic
cardiacarrestvictiminhemorrhagicshockwithvasopressin:acasereportandbriefreviewoftheliterature.J
Trauma.200457:1779.[PubMed:15284571]
55.SharmaRM,SetlurR.Vasopressininhemorrhagicshock.AnesthAnalg.2005101:8334.
[PubMed:16116000]
56.StadlbauerKH,WenzelV,KrismerAC,VoeckelWG,LindnerKH.Vasopressinduringuncontrolled
hemorrhagicshock:lessbleedingbelowthediaphragm,moreperfusionabove.AnestAnalg.2005101:830
2.
57.TsuneyoshiI,OnomotoM,Yonetani,KanmuraY.Lowdosevasopressininfusioninpatientswithsevere
vasodilatoryhypotensionafterprolongedhemorrhageduringgeneralanesthesia.JAnest.200519:1703.
58.RothJV.Bolusvasopressinduringhemorrhagicshock?AnesthAnalg.2006102:1098.
59.RaabH,LindnerKH,WenzelV.Preventingcardiacarrestduringhemorrhagicshockwithvasopressin.
CritCareMed.200836:S474S480.[PubMed:20449913]
60.HolmesCL,LandryDW,GrantonJT.Sciencereview:vasopressinandthecardiovascularsystem,Part2
clinicalphysiology.CritCare.20048:1523.[PMCID:PMC420051][PubMed:14975041]
61.DunserMW,MayrAJ,TurA,PajkW,BarbaraF,KnotzerH,etal.Ischemicskinlesionsasa
complicationofcontinuousvasopressininfusionincatecholamineresistantvasodilatoryshock:incidenceand
riskfactors.CritCareMed.200331:13948.[PubMed:12771608]
62.MyburghJ.Norepinephrine:moreofaneurohormonethanavasopressor.CritCare.201014:196.
[PMCID:PMC3219251][PubMed:20860853]
63.MeybohmP,CavusE,BeinB,SteinfathM,WeberB,HamannC,etal.Smallvolumeresuscitation:a
randomizedcontrolledtrialwitheithernorepinephrineorvasopressinduringseverehemorrhage.JTrauma.
200762:6406.[PubMed:17414341]
64.CavusE,MeybohmP,DoergesV,HugoHH,SteinfathM,NordstroemJ,etal.Cerebraleffectsofthree
resuscitationprotocolsinuncontrolledhaemorrhagicshock:arandomisedcontrolledexperimentalstudy.
Resuscitation.200980:56772.[PubMed:19217706]
65.LiT,FangY,ZhuY,FanX,LiaoZ,ChenF,etal.AsmalldoseofArginineVasopressinincombination
withNorepinephrineisagoodearlytreatmentforuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockafterhemostasis.JSurg
Res.2010[Epubaheadofprint]
66.BauerSR,AloiJJ,AhrensCL,YehJY,CulverDA,ReddyAT,etal.Discontinuationofvasopressin
beforenorepinephrineincreasestheincidenceofhypotensioninpatientsrecoveringfromsepticshock:a
retrospectivecohortstudy.JCritCare.201025:362.[PubMed:19926252]
67.KrauszMM.FluidresuscitationstrategiesintheIsraeliArmy.JTrauma.200354:S39S42.
[PubMed:12768101]
68.BlumenfeldA,MelamedE,KalmovichD,etal.Prehospitalfluidresuscitationintrauma:theIDFMC
panelSummary.JIsraeliMilMed.20041:610.
69.TheBrainTraumafoundation,TheAmericanAssociationofNeurologicalSurgeonsandTheJoint
SectiononNeurotraumaandCriticalCare.Resuscitationofbloodpressureandoxygenation.JNeurotrauma.
200017:47182.[PubMed:10937889]
70.DarDE,SoustielJF,ZaaroorM,BroftainEM,LeibowitzA,ShapiraY.ModerateRinger'slactate
solutionresuscitationyieldsbestneurologicaloutcomeincontrolledhemorrhagicshockcombinedwithbrain
injuryinrats.Shock.201034:7582.[PubMed:20551780]
71.HolcombJB.Fluidresuscitationinmoderncombatcasualtycare:lessonslearntfromSomalia.JTrauma.
200354:S46S51.[PubMed:12768103]
72.HolcroftJW,VassarMJ,TurnerJE,DerletRW,KramerGC.3%NaCland7.5%NaCl/dextran70inthe
resuscitationofseverelyinjuredpatients.AnnSurg.1987206:27988.[PMCID:PMC1493198]
[PubMed:2443087]
73.WadeCE,KramerGC,GradyJJ,FabianTC,YounesRN.Efficacyofhypertonic7.5%salineand6%
dextran70intreatingtrauma:ametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials.Surgery.1997122:60916.
[PubMed:9308620]
74.BulgerEM,MayS,KerbyJD,EmersonS,StiellIG,SchreiberMA,etal.OutofhospitalHypertonic
ResuscitationAfterTraumaticHypovolemicShock:ARandomized,PlaceboControlledTrial.AnnSurg.
2010[PMCID:PMC3232054]
75.KagawaE,InoueI,KawagoeT,IshiharaM,ShimataniY,KurisuS,etal.Assessmentofoutcomesand
differencesbetweeninandoutofhospitalcardiacarresttreatedwithcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwith
extracorporeallifesupport.Resuscitation.201081:96873.[PubMed:20627526]
76.LeGuenM,NicolasRobinA,CarreiraS,RauxM,LeprinceP,RiouB,etal.Extracorporeallifesupport
followingoutofhospitalrefractorycardiacarrest.CritCare.201115:R29.[PMCID:PMC3222065]
[PubMed:21244674]
77.AlamHB,DugganM,LiY,SpaniolesK,LiuB,TabbaraM,etal.Puttinglifeonholdforhow
long.Profoundhypothermiccardiopulmonarybypassinaswinemodelofcomplexvascularinjuries?J
Trauma.200864:91222.[PubMed:18404056]
78.CabralesP,TsaiAG,IntagliettaM.Hyperosmotichyperoncoticversushyperosmotichyperviscous:small
volumeresuscitationinhemorrhagicshock.Shock.200422:4317.[PubMed:15489635]
79.CabralesP,IntagliettaM,TsaiAG.Increaseplasmaviscositysustainsmicrocirculationafterresuscitation
fromhemorrhagicshockandcontinuousbleeding.Shock.200523:54955.[PubMed:15897809]
80.WettsteinR,ErniD,IntagliettaM,TsaiAG.Rapidrestorationofmicrocirculatorybloodflowwith
hyperviscousandhyperoncoticsolutionslowersthetransfusiontriggerinresuscitationfromhemorrhagic
shock.Shock.200625:6416.[PubMed:16721273]
81.CabralesP,TsaiAG,IntagliettaM.Hemorrhagicshockresuscitationwithcarbonmonoxidesaturated
blood.Resuscitation.200772:306318.[PubMed:17092627]
82.SalazarVzquezBY,WettsteinR,CabralesP,etal.Microvascularexperimentalevidenceontherelative
significanceofrestoringoxygencarryingcapacityvsbloodviscosityinshockresuscitation.Biochem
BiophysicActa.20081784:14217.[PMCID:PMC2886513]
83.CheungAT,ToPL,ChanDM,etal.Comparisonoftreatmentmodalitiesforhemorrhagicshock.Artif
CellsBloodSubstitImmobilBiotechnol.200735:17390.[PubMed:17453703]
84.TsaiAG,HofmannA,CabralesP,etal.Perfusionvs.oxygendeliveryintransfusionwithfreshand
oldredbloodcells:Theexperimentalevidence.TransfusApherSci.201043:6978.
[PMCID:PMC2918661][PubMed:20646963]
85.KentnerR,SafarP,PruecknerS,BehringerW,WuX,HenchirJ,etal.Titratedhypertonic/hyperoncotic
solutionforhypotensivefluidresuscitationduringuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinrats.Resuscitation.
200565:8795.[PubMed:15797280]
86.HankeAA,MaschlerS,SchochlH,FlorickeF,GorlingerK,ZangerK,etal.Invitroimpairmentof
wholebloodcoagulationandplateletsfunctionbyHypertonicSalineHydroxyethylStarch.ScandJTrauma
ResuscEmergMed.201119:12.[PMCID:PMC3045349][PubMed:21310047]
87.VillelaNR,SalazarVzquezBY,IntagliettaM.Microcirculatoryeffectsofintravenousfluidsincritical
illness:plasmaexpansionbeyondcrystalloidsandcolloids.CurrOpinAnaesthesiol.200922:1637.
[PubMed:19307891]
88.VillelaN,TsaiA,CabralesP,IntagliettaM.ImprovedResuscitationFromHemorrhagicShockWith
Ringer'sLactateWithIncreasedViscosityintheHamsterWindowChamberModel.JofTrauma.
201171:418424.[PubMed:21248647]
89.MatsushitaS,ChuangVT,KanazawaM,TanaseS,KawaiK,MaruyamaTetal.Recombinanthuman
serumalbumindimerhashighbloodcirculationactivityandlowvascularpermeabilityincomparisonwith
nativehumanserumalbumin.PharmRes.200623:88291.[PubMed:16715378]
90.CabralesP,TsaiAG,IntagliettaM.Isresuscitationfromhemorrhagicshocklimitedbybloodoxygen
carryingcapacityorbloodviscosity?Shock.200727:3809.[PubMed:17414420]
91.CabralesP,IntagliettaM,TsaiAG.Transfusionrestoresbloodviscosityandreinstatesmicrovascular
conditionsfromhemorrhagicshockindependentofoxygencarryingcapacity.Resuscitation.200775:124
34.[PMCID:PMC3224809][PubMed:17481796]
92.MartiniJ,CabralesP,KA,AcharyaSA,IntagliettaM,TsaiAG.Survivaltimeinseverehemorrhagic
shockafterperioperativehemodilutionislongerwithPEGconjugatedhumanserumalbuminthanwithHES
130/0.4:amicrovascularperspective.CritCare.200812:R54.[PMCID:PMC2447609]
[PubMed:18423033]
93.CabralesP,TsaiAG,AnandaK,AcharyaSA,IntagliettaM.Volumeresuscitationfromhemorrhagic
shockwithalbuminandhexaPEGylatedhumanserumalbumin.Resuscitation.200879:13946.
[PMCID:PMC2758307][PubMed:18621463]
94.ExoJL,ShellingtonDK,BayirH,VagniVA,JanescoFeldmanK,MaL,etal.Resuscitationof
traumaticbraininjuryandhemorrhagicshockwithpolynitroxylatedalbumin,hextend,hypertonicsaline,and
lactatedRingers:Effectsonacutehemodynamics,survival,andneuronaldeathinmice.JNeurotrauma.
200926:24038.[PMCID:PMC2864460][PubMed:19691424]
95.KowalenkoT,SternSA,DronenSC,WangX.Improvedoutcomewithhypotensiveresuscitationof
uncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinaswinemodel.JTrauma.199233:34953.[PubMed:1404501]
96.DuttonRP,MackenzieCF,ScaleaTM.Hypotensiveresuscitationduringactivehemorrhage:impacton
inhospitalmortality.JTrauma.200252:11416.[PubMed:12045644]
97.DronenSC,SternSA,WangX,StanleyM.Acomparisonoftheresponseofnearfatalacute
hemorrhagewithandwithoutavascularinjurytorapidvolumeexpansion.AmJEmergMed.199311:331
5.[PubMed:8216511]
98.KienbaumP,HeuterT,PavlakovicG,MichelMC,PetersJ.S(+)ketamineincreasesmusclesympathetic
activityandmaintainstheneuralresponsetohypotensivechallengesinhumans.Anesthesiology.
200194:2528.[PubMed:11176089]
99.BonannoGF.Ketamineinwar/tropicalsurgery(afinaltributetotheracemicmixture)Injury.
200233:3237.[PubMed:12091028]
100.MorrisC,PerrisA,KleinJ,MahoneyP.Anaesthesiainhaemodynamicallycompromisedemergency
patientsdoesketaminerepresentthebestchoiceofinductionagent?Anaesthesia.200964:5329.
[PubMed:19413824]
101.KaurP,BasuS,KaurG,KaurR.Transfusionprotocolintrauma.JEmergTraumaShock.20114:103
8.[PMCID:PMC3097557][PubMed:21633577]
102.DuchesneJC,BarbeauJM,IslamTM,WahlG,GreiffensteinP,McSwainNE,etal.Damagecontrol
resuscitation:fromemergencydepartmenttotheoperatingroom.AmSurg.201177:2016.
[PubMed:21337881]
103.MorrisonCA,CarrickMM,NormanMA,ScottBG,WelshFJ,TsaiP,etal.Hypotensiveresuscitation
strategyreducestransfusionrequirementsandseverepostoperativecoagulopathyintraumapatientswith
hemorrhagicshock:preliminaryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial.JTrauma.201170:65263.
[PubMed:21610356]
104.LustenbergerT,TalvingP,KobayashiL,BarmparasG,InabaK,LamL,etal.Earlycoagulopathyafter
isolatedseveretraumaticbraininjury:relationshipwithhypoperfusionchallenged.JTrauma.201069:1410
4.[PubMed:20404754]
105.GreutersS,vandenBergA,FranschmanG,ViersenVA,BeishuizenA,PeedermanSM,etal.Acute
anddelayedmildcoagulopathyarerelatedtooutcomeinpatientswithisolatedtraumaticbraininjury.Crit
Care.2011:15R2.[PMCID:PMC3222029]
106.KashukJL,MooreEE,SawyerM,LeT,JohnsonJ,BifflWL,etal.Postinjurycoagulopathy
management:goaldirectedresuscitationviaPOCthrombelastography.AnnSurg.2010251:60414.
[PubMed:20224372]
107.SchoechlH,NienaberU,MaegeleM,HochleitnerG,PrimavesiF,SteitzB,etal.Transfusionin
trauma:thromboelastometryguidedcoagulationfactorconcentratebasedtherapyversusfreshfrozenplasma
basedtherapy.CritCare.201115:R83.[PMCID:PMC3219338][PubMed:21375741]
108.DavidJS,MarchalV,LevratA,InabaK.Whichisthemosteffectivestrategy:earlydetectionof
coagulopathywiththromboelastometryoruseofhemostaticfactorsorboth?CritCare.201115:433.
[PMCID:PMC3218978][PubMed:21672283]
FiguresandTables
Table1
Classicalclinicalclassificationsofhaemorrhagicshock
Table2
Therapeutical/physiologicalclassificationofHSandfirstlinemanagementofsourcecontrol
Figure1
EffectsofVRmanipulationsonhaemodynamicsinpatientswithnormalcardiacreserve
Figure2
EffectsofVRmanipulationsonhaemodynamicsinpatientswithdiminishedcardiacreserve
Table3
HS:toomuchtooearly,toolittleandtoolate.Whatistheidealorperfectresuscitation?
Table4
DecisionmakinginCriticalHS:Acomprehensivemanagement
Table5
DecisionmakinginSevereHS:Acomprehensivemanagement
ArticlesfromJournalofEmergencies,Trauma,andShockareprovidedherecourtesyofMedknow
Publications