Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility

of producers?

The over-packaged product has been a trend in todays competitive commercial world.
A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether it is the
responsibility of manufacturers or consumers to avoid the extra-packaged commodity.
This essay will give assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible
conclusion.

It is an undeniable fact that packaging helps to protect the products from damage or
contamination, it increases the durability, safety, hygiene and freshness of goods. For
instance, the self-life of goods increases significantly when they have packed in several
layers of aluminum foil and superior plastic. Furthermore, lucrative appearance could be
a significant factor for selling of the product more in the competitive market. Thus, the
manufacturer's reason for over packing products seems liable.

On the contrary, people who are against to over-packaging claims, the cost of the
material use to pack an item include to the product, where consumers care about the
quality of goods. Moreover, the manufacturers often use non-disposable wrappers like
plastic which are harmful to our environment and produce a significant amount of
garbage. Finally, the chemical used for packing can be severe ailment for health and
disposal of waste increases product carbon footprint.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that consumers,
producers, and sellers have a collective role to avoid over-packaged products to solve
the adverse effects. Appropriate authority and government must establish proper rules
and criteria and spread the awareness among the users about the drawbacks of over
packaging.
Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or
ideas to take any decisions. Discuss

Innovations or new ideas and decision making is a crucial step in the success of a
company. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether the
involvement of employees required for the decision-making process or it is the sole
responsibility of the management team. This essay will give assertion on both sides of
the contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

The solid foundation of any successful company is its people. Employees represent a
source of knowledge and ideas. People working in the particular area know the ins and
outs of the processes, which increase productivity and save the company time and
money from outsourcing. Furthermore, Teamwork-Participation and engagement of
employees in decision making creates a very positive impression and inspires them to
work better. The employees start feeling like part of the company and their output, job
satisfaction, morale attitude and innovative ideas significantly increase.

On the contrary, people who advocate that only management should take decisions
claims, employees may give advice in which they have their personal benefit and could
be harmful to the company. Besides, taking suggestions from everyone would only lead
to chaos and additional employees demand will increase. If selected people are on the
board of decision they can easily reach to the solution without any dilemma.

After pondering over a significant amount of thought on both the sides, I opine that an
organization can only flourish well where its employee's given the freedom to innovate
and rewarded for the same. Top level management should be smart enough to judge its
plausibility of implementation, as the final decision has to be taken by them.
Nowadays, people spend too much time at work, to the extent that, they hardly have
time for their personal life. Discuss.

It is irrefutable to say that, these days jobs are becoming slave masters. People are
spending a large part of their day in their offices to meet the cut-throat competition and
neglecting their personal and family life. Considering this, some analyst opines that this
trend is good for our society, while others argue opposite to it. This essay will give
assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

To begin with, there are many important reasons why people do overtime work. Firstly,
due to globalization, employees are facing competition and try to improve their
performance and maintain position at work. Secondly, companies are creating project
deadlines too small which eventually pressurize employees to deliver their best work in
a short time.

On the contrary, long working hours and highly stressful jobs lead to numerous physical
and mental health implications. There is absolutely nothing to prove that long working
hours improve productivity. Furthermore, another problem with this set up is the effect it
has on a persons family and social life and causes memory related problems. When
people spend long hours in the office, they get a little time to spend with their dear ones,
because of it, children deprived of the attention they deserve from their parents.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that proper work-
life balance is essential to lead a contented life. It hoped that companies arrange their
working hours in such a way that employees also get some time for themselves.
It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good
choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is irrefutable to say that, professional life and married life both have a pivotal role in
our life. An individual cannot live peacefully if there is no synchronization between these
two lives. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether getting
married before the settlement of career is right or people must complete their academic
path first. This essay will give assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering
plausible conclusion.

To begin, if a person marries at an early age, then he or she has more time to spend
with their loved ones. A good life partner will be supportive and helping hands during
studies. Partners would assist to meet responsibilities other than studies, then the
studies would be more focused and in a result a prominent success leading towards a
bright career. Moreover, people would be able to see his or her kids growing and start
their professional life before his retirement.

On the contrary, there are many important disadvantages if a person married before the
settlement of career. Firstly, individuals have to take more responsibilities toward their
family, due to which, they do not get enough time to study, and most of them leave their
education. Secondly, there is the probability of more tension on the part of both sets of
parents regarding the tuition fees, drop of grades and balancing time at home and
academic study. Thirdly, marrying at an early age also increases the population as
maturity level is low chances of divorce also increases.

After pondering over a significant amount of thought on both the sides, I opine that
marrying late is a better option than marrying in early age. Marrying late makes a
person more responsible and mature before taking this crucial step.
Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for
their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree?

It is irrefutable to say that, to succeed in the highly competitive world, a person must be
bilingual or multilingual. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of
whether a primary school is the best place for learning foreign language or children
should not be forced to learn. This essay will give assertion on both sides of the
contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

To begin with, learning a foreign language is essential for the growth of a childs brain. A
study by United Nations, for instance, has proved that learning any language other than
the natives mother tongue, activates various parts and cell of the brain, which
eventually make a child intelligent. Also, by studying the foreign language, a child can
easily communicate with Alien Land people and can understand their culture and
lifestyle. Moreover, knowing a foreign language will help a child to express things more
clearly as they have a wider range of vocabulary than those who start late, In other
words, cognitive advantages follow from becoming better multi-tasking-bilingual.

On the contrary, putting excess pressure on kindergarten pupils to learn a foreign

language has downsides also. It, indirectly, increases the burden of primary school
students, due to which, they will not be able to understand important subjects such as
Science and Mathematics, fundamentally. Moreover, children may get confused
because of learning many languages at the same time, and this could have an adverse
impact on their personality development. For example, it claimed that bilingual children
develop the ability to talk more slowly than monolingual kids.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that the benefits
of learning a foreign language in early age are apparently outweighing the drawbacks. I
believe, a person equipped with more languages help the society to make it more
prosperous and flourished.
In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed. Does a common man suffer from a
groups ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and
examples.

It is conspicuous that, throughout history, the thinking of a group of people is impacting

the lives of thousands of civilians. Whether it considered on a political or social level, a
set of decisions of a group explains how a society should work. I ultimately agreed that,
in the conflict of interest between different countries or different groups, it is the innocent
people who sacrifice their lives.

First of all, during World War II, a group of countries namely US, UK and China attacked
Japan with explosive atomic bombs destroying the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
killing more than one million civilians. A Clear example of the decision laid by a few
countries against Japan to surrender to its allies. Though these countries achieved
victory in their mission, Japanese people are still suffering from the dangerous radiation
effect which resulted in blindness and mental disorders. Thus, we can say that political
ideologies of a group can drastically harm society.

Also, September 11 attacks on the US by a group of 19 militants, associated with

Islamic extremist group, hijacked four airplanes and killed around 3,000 people by
colliding planes into symbolic US landmark. This example clearly shows how the
decision and planning of these terrorist activists took lives of thousands of innocents.

After pondering over a significant amount of thought, I opine that conflicts of ideas are
inevitable so individuals should respect the opinions of others so that this world can be
more peaceful and prosperous.
Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public
schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating
them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most
agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with
details from your own experiences, observations or reading.

It is irrefutable to say that, advertising has become an indispensable part of any

corporate businesses to attract potential customers. A matter of considerable
controversy at present is the issue of whether advertisements should place in schools or
not a good idea to promote commercial business. This essay will give assertion on both
sides of the contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

Advertisements are an excellent source of funding for the public schools who always
find themselves hard to manage their financial cash flow. Furthermore, advertisements
targeted to kids such as toothpaste and shower gel are helpful to bring awareness to
children. For instance, children may enlighten about the importance of hygiene and
keep precautions in their mind before eating something.

On the contrary, schools are the home for young children where they come to learn
academic as well as moral lessons. These kids can be tempted to do any activities
easily, therefore, putting advertisements inside schools may impact pejoratively on such
Students. For example, a child might break his hands and legs by imitating and
reproducing the action pose shown on the great blockbuster movie advertisements.
Moreover, many ads nowadays display sexually motivated explicit materials and other
adult themes which would captivate young mind to delineate juvenile delinquency
indulging into an anti-social behavior such as raping, smoking, vandalism, and other
heinous crimes. Further, these children might tempt to spend a hefty sum of money to
buy the mendaciously advertised unfruitful products which not only hampers their
academic activities but also mainly effects on their brain development and ethical
behavior.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that
advertisements are an efficient and effortless source of money for the public schools.
However, schools management must act prudently to monitor students continuously
behavior and choose suitable advertisements to put inside schools so that children do
not go astray.
Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?

It is irrefutable to say that, these days English is becoming a universal language in

every part of the world. It has become an intermediate language between various
countries. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether
English will remain a global language or it will replace by another language. This essay
will give assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

To begin with, in todays international business market, English plays a pivotal role to
make the business links with other international companies. Besides, this language also
provides a sharp edge to societies in a hard competitive world to survive. Moreover,
English plays a significant role in technology, computer programming, and medical
science. A vast majority of documents, books, publications, contracts are in English.
Students who have knowledge of this language can access information from internet,
magazines, and books which eventually help them to increase job opportunities, social
awareness and share information in the foreign land while traveling.

On the contrary, with globalization language from emerging economic like India and
China such as Hindi and Mandarin, which use as a mother tongue by billions of people
have a greater potential to surpass English concerning the number of users. Also, the
software will easily translate languages, so we dont need to learn more than one
language just for communication in the future.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine although lots of
languages are emerging in this world, English will remain the most preferred language
in coming years.
Value added by travel in Education. Is travel a necessary component of education or
not? Will scholar sitting at home have more knowledge?

Education has always been an integral and pivotal aspect of the human civilization.
International studies are becoming a new trend for young people as a way to expand
their education beyond own traditional education style. A matter of considerable
controversy at present is the issue of whether different qualifications are necessary for
students or not. This essay will give assertion on both sides of the contention before
delivering plausible conclusion.

Studying abroad helps people increase their awareness about different cultures of the
world and the quality of education in foreign countries is excellent. For example,
universities have a large community of students both from the local area and all around
the globe. The diverse academic community enhances the quality of learning by
providing a wider spectrum of opinions and expertise. Moreover, acquiring a globally
recognized qualification or degree opens the doors to the international job market.

On the contrary, studying from home is also feasible. The readily available technological
gadgets and the internet enable the students to adopt on-line programs and attend
virtual classrooms. Foreign education costs to people a lot of money. Furthermore,
some students cannot resist the new environment, due to this, they either have to quit
their studies or come back to their respective countries. Also, some students may lose
their focus from their studies and start gravitating towards earning more money.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that e-learning is
available for acquiring and upgrading qualification but the real classroom settings are
valued more in teaching young learners. The wise decision is required to choose the
right mode of learning according to the individual needs.
Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this?
Discuss with appropriate examples.

It is irrefutable to say that, the world has become a global village. A significant number
of international shopping malls are opening their branches in almost all cities of the
world. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether large
shopping malls are replacing small shops or malls is vital for economic development.
This essay will give assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible
conclusion.

There are reasons for people to believe that large shopping malls are necessary to
established as multi stories shopping malls come with a large number of stores and
other facilities under one roof. After that, all types of facilities such as restaurants,
entertainments, and a variety of product options available. Moreover, these shopping
malls monitored by security guards with 24 hours close surveillance and free car
parking for customers. Finally, shopping malls create variety of job opportunities for
young people.

On the contrary, the supermarkets will monopolize the market and control the price due
to less and weak competitors. Besides, Old trend, die hard authentic products can be
only available in small shops. Parking is one of the biggest problems for small old stores
and customer requires walking several shops to buy a single product. Moreover,
massive discounts are offered by malls in festival seasons which also gravitate more
buyers and divert their attention towards traditional and small shops.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that existence of
shopping malls will boost the economic growth of the city. But, many people still depend
on small shops for their livelihood. So it is the government task to make some strict
regulations about this issue.
The space travel is fantastic these day and they are very fascinate towards its but there
are many environmental problems in our planet we should resolve the problems or travel
space and spend a lot of money.
or

Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by human?

Nowadays, there are many countries spend a large mountain of money in the outer
space traveling. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether
the governments should spend as much money as possible in space exploration or
these funds should be used for some basic needs of Earth. This essay will give
assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

First of all, our planet needs more researchers to solve the environment problems. For
example, the air pollution increasing day after day on the earth this is causing the whole
in the ozone layer. The administration must use their resources to find some alternative
fuels which are eco-friendly and help to save our environment and fossil fuels.
Secondly, governments should spend much money to support and help the people who
are starving to death. Also, essential to developing social infrastructure, create more job
opportunity for young people.

On the contrary, Asteroid mining helps us to fulfill the needs of various minerals which
are very scarce on our planet. After that, there are some possibilities that we come in
contact with extraterrestrial species which may be far advanced than us in technology
and medicine. Moreover, most of the technologies we take for granted today originated
thanks to space research, take satellite technology, for example, which we depend on
for broadcasting and weather forecasting. We cannot foresee the distant future, so we
ought to develop the capability to escape from the earth.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that traveling
space gives us valuable knowledge and pleasure, but we have many issues to address
first in-house. So, if we utilize the money that we are currently allocating today for space
travel and research to address the above problems, then it is possible we can see a
pollution and poverty free world.
In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite
as well.

In recent decades, low-cost airfare has made international travel easier, and many
countries have, therefore, developed their tourism industries into key sectors of their
economies. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether
tourism has tremendous benefits to the developing countries or has lots of drawbacks.
This essay will give assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible
conclusion.

Undoubtedly, there are significant benefits that tourism brings to a country. First, a
thriving tourist industry implies an increasing need for a variety of services such as
hotels, transport, restaurants, and entertainment. These results in a considerable
number of jobs created for people and also the development of the infrastructure
needed to accommodate visitors. Besides, tourism also helps to understand the foreign
culture more deeply. Moreover, tourism is a "green" industry that, unlike factories,
generates a low level of pollution. In fact, because beautiful natural landscapes are
often places that tourists come to see, a country will often be sure to maintain the view
to keep it attractive for tourists.

On the contrary, a country may suffer from the loss of their traditional culture. People in
a country changing their lifestyle, customs, and language to more effectively serve
visitors or because they become influenced by foreign countries. Besides, gravitate
more tourists and profits, the government is doing deforestation and building attractive
places, countries spent significant budget to attract tourist, which can use in other
problems like in research, poverty etcetera. Moreover, Crime and theft also increase as
a result of the increases in drugs and prostitution that caters to some vacationers.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that a nation
should seek to develop its tourism industry because it boosts its economy and improves
the relationship with other countries. However, proper rules and regulations must be
created by higher authorities to protect nations environment.
The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education- Einstein. What does he
mean by that? And do you think he is correct?

Education has always been an integral aspect of the human civilization In the traditional
school system, the content of syllabus was very confined and related to only religion,
philosophy, metaphysics, and scriptural subjects. This is the reason why Einstein
considered education to be the biggest barrier to his learning. This essay will give
assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

According to Einstein, students learn through a formally designed education pattern

restricting their thought process. Also, there are some rigid rules like an age of
admission, content, and duration, of course, procedures of examination, selection of
elective subject, etc. which designed by the government or designated agency such as
school. The students are taught and given the answers to the questions, and these
questions come in the examination to test their retention power. Thus, students are not
encouraged to think out of the box and search for a solution themselves. They all are
expected to provide the same answer which is in books. This example shows why
Einstein believed that formal education hinders the process of learning.

However, in my opinion, education in schools is important for children as it provides a

disciplined environment, proper guidance from the teacher, extracurricular activities to
develop basic skills like reading and writing. Besides, modern day education aid with a
variety of technology, computers, projectors, the Internet, and much more. There is
much to learn and more to assimilate. For instance, the internet provides vast
knowledge and students should be allowed to search the answers to their problems
themselves. This will help them in coming up with different solutions and succeeding in
life. Thus, we can say that education plays a vital role in the initial learning phase.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that preceding
discussion propounds the view that, having appropriate education has many benefits.
The government and administration must take some careful steps to enlighten
adolescents about the importance of teaching.
Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in
what ways this can impact on their reputation.

It is conspicuous that, shopping culture has been changed from the last one decade.
More and more companies these days offering lucrative deals to gravitate more
customers toward themselves. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the
issue of whether offering discounts by companies decrease company's brand value or it
helps to increase organizations revenue. This essay will give assertion on both sides of
the contention before delivering plausible conclusion.

To begin, people who claim discounting degrades brand value argue that, the profit
margin in the stores will decline as the goods are sold at reduced prices. Sometimes,
these prices may even be below than market value. Furthermore, giving discounts to
customers may encourage them to ask for it all the time, and if the marketer does not
provide the best deal, they may get discouraged and look at other places for the same.
Above all, discounting can hurt organizations business in the long run. For instance, if a
company is giving discounts on time to time basis it shows that it has a lack of
confidence in its products and customer may think that the product is not
trustworthiness.

On the contrary, offering discounts increases the customer base of the organizations.
People prefer to do more shopping during a sale; discounts encourage people to spend
more. Moreover, many businesses have monthly, quarterly or yearly sales goals. For
instance, if a business is in danger of missing these goals, offering discounts can help
the business to meet their sales figures. Additionally, discounting items enable you to
free up room in stores, clearing last season's stock, or out-dated models. For instance,
Reebok, the clothing company, offers to discount up to 60% during Christmas days. It
helps the company to remove the last year stock so that new items come on store
shelves.

After pondering over a great deal of thought on both the sides, I opine that although
discounts decrease the margin of the company, it helps customers to buy branded
things at a reasonable price. Thus, giving discounts do not reduce the brand value of
the company but increase client base.
Parents should be held legally responsible for their childrens acts. What is your
opinion? Support it with personal examples.

It is irrefutable to say that, violence by juveniles has increased in recent years at an

alarming rate in our society. Children are involving themselves in crime and making our
society jeopardize. A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of
whether parents should be responsible for their young ones fault or should not punish.
This essay will give assertion on both sides of the contention before delivering plausible
conclusion.

On the one hand, parents should not blame for their childrens fault as the children
entirely make the decision to commit the crime. Many parents have done their best part
in the upbringing of their children so that their child cannot commit any offense, yet, their
offspring still succeed in engaging the same. Moreover, mass media is playing a crucial
role in making adolescents aggressive. For example, currently, many violent games and
movies are being released in the market. This makes a childs more violent which could
be one of the reasons for committing the crime.

On the other hand, parents should hold accountable for their childrens crimes because
parents are the first people that a child gets to know after he or she is born. It is
believed that parents start shaping the childs moral compass and character from a very
young age. Also, most of the children do offense because they were violently abused by
their parents when they were young. For instance, according to 2013 statistics, in
America, most offenses were made by juvenile belongs to a criminal family.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, parents should not solely blame and punished
for their childrens actions. Other factors should be taken into account when deciding on
whom to blame. The government must take some careful steps to educate children in
their schools so that they do not commit the crime.
Some people think law changes our behavior. Discuss.

Everyone knows that laws are the rules laid by the government on the citizens of their
respective country. It helps in smooth functioning of the nation by governing the
behavior of people. It disagreed that laws can change the behavior of a person. It can
only assist in creating a disciplined environment for the society and controlling the crime
to some extent but not eliminating it.

Firstly, imposing laws has created a sense of fear among people of getting punished.
For instance, damaging the historical monuments, books, paintings, sculptures or
another form of art is considered a crime and is punishable under vandalism law. This
example shows that a person with moral responsibility will take care of others assets,
but an individual who is not worried about the consequences will deface them. Thus, we
can say that humans action can be regulated by laws but cannot change completely.

Besides, in our day to day life, we follow the rules without even realizing them. Traffic
law is an example of this. Today, most of us follow the traffic signals out of habit. We
stop at a red light, start an indicator before a turn and wear the seat belt when we are
on the road. Thus, we can say that laws embed some changes in human behavior to
some extent. However, we are still facing traffic accidents which clearly show that rules
and regulations have controlled the conduct of humanity without altering them
completely.

In conclusion, we can say that standards and regulations can help in controlling the
behavior that is dangerous. Laws not only assist in checking the reckless nature of
people but are necessary for the development of society.
Talk about the pros/ cons of this era as is full of daily inventions.

Science and technology have great influence on human life since their inception
(establishment). A lot of technological advancements have been taking place day by
day, and which are conspicuously affecting people's life. Considering this, some
analysts argue that technology is improving our life, while, others think it is creating
problems. This essay focuses on some pros and cons of technological advancements
and asserts the appropriate conclusion.

To begin with, technology has made our life very comfortable. It is clear that computers
these days are so efficient and easy to use for people that they become a part of their
life. People can do everything on computers which save their time and effort.
Furthermore, with the advent of electronic communication world has become a global
village. For instance, VOIP technology helps people to make face-to-face conversation
with their kin and kith anytime. Moreover, technology enhances the students interest
and intimacy towards their studies. They can watch recorded video tutorials to remove
their concepts in any field. Also, medical discoveries occur at a much more rapid rate;
thanks to machines and computers that aid in the research process and allow for more
intense educational research into medical matters.

On the other hand, technology also brings some threats to people. Firstly, the
inventions of weapons especially nuclear war gadgets are extremely dangerous for the
existence of the entire life forms on the Earth. Secondly, an increased use of motor
vehicles causes the contamination of the environment which eventually causes certain
problems such as the rise in a surface temperature and global warming. Lastly,
companies that depend heavily on computer systems to conduct business can come to
a virtual standstill if the system breaks down.

In conclusion, I pen down saying that, the advantages of technologies outweigh

disadvantages. However, as every garden has some weeds, higher authorities must
take appropriate steps to reduce its adverse effects.
Imitating celebrities in sports and movies good or bad?

Hero worship is in our blood. In this day and age, media and sports personalities are the
heroes. They are everywhere on the billboards, in the newspapers, on TV and
internet. This omnipresence has earned them widespread fame and millions of fans who
try to imitate everything that they do. Is this an active development? Lets examine.

Imitating film and sports personalities are nothing unusual, but unfortunately, it isnt
always good. A large number of our celebrities dont set good examples. Many of them
are

known for their extravagant and wasteful lifestyles. They dont mind spending millions of
dollars on shopping and drive super luxury cars. Unfortunately, they inspire middle-class
people, who can hardly afford this, to adopt the same lifestyle. Wafer thin models
promote unhealthy eating habits. Anorexia has become a major health issue these
days. Models and film stars who look nearly perfect because of Photoshop effects have
given rise to a generation obsessed with looking perfect. Even extramarital relationships
are now considered perfectly acceptable because several celebrities have multiple
partners. Moreover, celebrities are often found in smoking advertisements, charged with
drugs, and other criminal activities, youth following their path can result in the
destruction of ethical values of society.

On the other hand, we do have something to learn from these famous people. They are
Achievers, actively participating in social activities like helping poor children to study
and creating awareness on protecting national heritage. Many of them had humble
beginnings. Still, they rose to fame because of their determination and hard work. We
can also achieve the same if we make a sincere attempt.

After analyzing the situation, it is not hard to see that admiring and imitating film and
sports personalities who do not set a good example is bad. Only admiring them is
alright. The problem begins when you try to emulate everything that they do.
Communication has changed significantly in the last ten years. Discuss pros and cons
impacts.

Information technology has brought the world closer together and made it a global
village. Now, we can not only share information quickly and efficiently, but we can also
bring down barriers of linguistic and geographic boundaries. This essay will discuss
pros and cons of mass communication on individual lives before delivering conclusion.

To begin with, technology has drastically changed the way of mass communication.
Communication has also become cheaper, quicker, and more efficient. We can now
communicate with anyone around the globe by just text messaging them or sending
them an email for an almost instantaneous response. The internet has also opened up
face to face direct communication from different parts of the world thanks to the help of
video conferencing. Information technology has contributed to bridge the cultural gap by
helping people from different cultures to communicate with one another and allow for
the exchange of views and ideas, thus increasing awareness and reducing prejudice.

On the other hand, some people believe that an information revolution has decreased
the privacy of individuals. From cell phones signals to email hacking, people are
worried about their private information, which could be stolen and misused.
Furthermore, traditional culture of many countries is now changing. To exemplify,
youngsters in Third World countries who watch Hollywood movies try to copy lifestyle of
people of developed countries. Hence, they stop giving respect to their culture. Lastly,
as information on the internet is in the English language, many other languages are
losing their importance.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, mass communication has tremendous benefits
for all of us. But, we should keep in our mind that every garden has some weeds, so
government should create some laws to handle negative side of mass communication.
Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news &
awareness and for some, it acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this?

The invention of Television around two decades back opened wide frontiers for
transmission of visual communication and awareness. Since then the research and
development on this have never paused, and today we have 3D and curved televisions
available as well. In fact, it will be hard to find any private family without watching TV as
a part of their daily life. It has helped in making the world a smaller place to live in by

making all sorts of shows, latest news update, and information in all areas via a wide
range of channels.

Television provides a broad range to channels to choose from on tourism, travel, foods,
lifestyle, news, general knowledge, movies, music, reality show and much more. In fact,

the information is so useful that many people plan their holiday based on a play on
tourism, they try to cook new items by following the recipe shown, become aware of all
sorts of happenings in the world and least to mention the crazy about the sports event.
For many, TV is almost indispensable as they believe it to be a friend, which is always
there when needed.

Television is a splendid time waster. We no longer have enough time for hobbies, other
outside amusements like theaters, movies, sports got ignored. People have grown
addicted to television, often neglecting the necessary and more important things like
meals, sleep, and even work. The more the viewer watches television, the lazier they
become. The TV glues them to the set instead of allowing them to go out. Television

prevents people from communicating with each other which had caused the harm to the
relationship between family members. Parents sit and watch tv at dinner instead of
talking to each other.

Finally, it is our duty to limit anything in too excess. The benefits which TV has brought
into our daily lives cannot deny.