Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Recommended
Action to be
Taken on
Discovery of a
Broken or
Defective Rail
Synopsis
This document gives
recommendations for the minimum
actions to be taken on discovery of a
broken or defective rail. It supports
Railway Group Standard GC/RT5022.
Submitted by
This document is the property of
Railtrack PLC. It shall not be
reproduced in whole or in part without
the written permission of the Controller,
Dean Benson Railway Group Standards,
Standards Project Manager Railtrack PLC.
Published by:
Authorised by Safety & Standards Directorate
Railtrack PLC
Railtrack House DP01
Euston Square
London NW1 2EE
Brian Alston
Controller, Railway Group Standards Copyright 2000 Railtrack PLC
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Contents
Section Description Page
Part A
Issue Record 2
Responsibilities 2
Health and Safety Responsibilities 2
Supply 2
Part B
1 Purpose 3
2 Scope 3
3 Definitions 3
4 Inroduction 4
5 Recommended Action to be Taken upon the Discovery of Broken Rails 4
6 Recommended Action to be Taken upon the Discovery of Rail Defects 5
7 Recommended Action to be Taken upon the Discovery of Cracked or Broken
Fishplates 6
8 Flame Cut Holes in Rails and Fishplates 7
9 Equipment Used to Pass Trains over Broken or Defective Rails 7
Appendices
A Recommended Action to be Taken upon the Discovery of Broken Rails 9
B Recommended Actions to be Taken upon the Discovery of Defects in Rolled
non-AMS Rails 16
C Recommended Action to be Taken upon the Discovery of Defects in Rolled
AMS Rails 20
D Recommended Action to be Taken upon the Discovery of Defects in Cast Rails
and Crossings 25
E Recommended Action to be Taken upon the Discovery of Cracked or Broken
Fishplates 31
References 32
RAILTRACK 1
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 2 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
Part A
Issue Record
This document will be updated when necessary by distribution of a complete
replacement.
Revisions in the reissued document will be marked by a vertical black line in the
right hand margin adjacent to the revision.
Responsibilities
Railway Group Standards are mandatory on all members of the Railway Group *
and apply to all relevant activities that fall into the scope of each individuals
Railway Safety Case. If any of those activities are performed by a contractor, the
contractors obligation in respect of Railway Group Standards is determined by
the terms of the contract between the respective parties. Where a contractor is
a duty holder of a Railway Safety Case then Railway Group Standards apply
directly to the activities described in the Safety Case.
* The Railway Group comprises Railtrack and the duty holders of the Railway
Safety Cases accepted by Railtrack
Supply
Controlled and uncontrolled copies of this document may be obtained from the
Industry Safety Liaison Dept, Safety and Standards Directorate, Railtrack PLC,
Railtrack House DP01, Euston Square, London, NW1 2EE.
2 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 3 of 32
Part B
1 Purpose
This document gives recommendations for the minimum actions to be taken on
discovery of a broken or defective rail. It supports Railway Group Standard
GC/RT5022.
2 Scope
This document contains recommendations that are applicable to the duty holders
of the following category of Railway Safety Case:
Infrastructure Controller.
3 Definitions
All technical terms used in this document, other than those given below, have
the meanings defined in GC/RC5603.
Broken rail
A rail that has either:
Defective rail
A rail that is not broken, but which contains a crack (visible or invisible), localised
spreading of the rail head or some other defect requiring the rail to be either
removed prematurely from the track or repaired to prevent it from breaking in
service.
ESR
Emergency speed restriction.
RAILTRACK 3
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 4 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
Track category
The classification of a section of track by usage and speed, so that requirements
relating to design, maintenance, renewal and inspection of the track may be
specified and applied. The procedure for categorising track is given in
GC/RT5023.
4 Introduction
This document quotes, verbatim and boxed, sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5 of
GC/RT5022 and gives recommendations which will generally enable the
requirements of these sections of the Railway Group Standard to be met with
respect to the actions to be taken on discovery of a broken or defective rail.
5 Recommended Action
to be Taken upon the
Discovery of Broken Rails
The procedure shall only be for the use of people who are trained and competent
in the application of the procedure or by track engineers who can demonstrate
competence through relevant knowledge and experience.
Other people who have received special training and hold valid certificates are
permitted to authorise trains to pass over broken rails in accordance with a
separate procedure set out in the Rule Book, GO/RT3000.
The minimum actions shall be selected from one of the following options:
The specified minimum actions shall vary to suit the following factors:
4 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 5 of 32
The minimum action shall be varied during the course of events if required to suit
changing conditions (for example, the fitting of equipment to the break to permit
trains to pass or the deterioration of sleepers supporting the broken rail).
The procedure shall only permit trains to pass over a broken rail at 20mph if the
following conditions are met:
the break has been fitted with a temporary rail clamping system designed for
use at a speed of at least 20mph;
the break is not within 3m of a welded or fishplated joint;
the gap between rail ends does not exceed 50mm wide.
The procedure shall require the broken rail to be removed from the track within
24 hours of its discovery in lines in track categories 1A, 1, 2 and 3 and within
48 hours of its discovery in track categories 4, 5 and 6.
When a broken rail is discovered, the actions required by the procedure shall be
implemented.
6 Recommended Action
to be Taken upon the
Discovery of Rail Defects
RAILTRACK 5
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 6 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
The specified minimum actions shall vary to suit the following factors:
The minimum actions shall be formulated to minimise the likelihood of the rail
breaking before it has been removed or repaired. Where a likelihood remains of
the rail breaking before it is removed or repaired, the minimum actions shall be
designed to reduce the consequences of the rail break.
If a rail defect is discovered of a type that may be repeated in the length of rail as
manufactured (for example, piping), the procedure shall require consideration to
be given to replacing the complete rail between adjacent joints.
When a defective rail is discovered, the actions required by the procedure shall
be implemented.
7 Recommended Action
to be Taken upon the
Discovery of Cracked or
Broken Fishplates
6 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 7 of 32
The specified minimum actions shall vary to suit the following factors:
Both fishplates at a joint shall be replaced, even if only one of the fishplates has
been broken or cracked. All other components used to form the joint shall also
be replaced at the time the fishplates are changed.
The procedure shall require the underlying cause of the broken or cracked
fishplates to be investigated and, where the cause is identified, action to be
taken to prevent a recurrence.
If a flame cut hole is found in a standard grade group rail in a running line, a
20mph speed restriction shall be imposed and the rail changed within 36 hours.
A temporary rail clamping system shall be fitted where possible.
If a flame cut hole is found in a higher grade group rail, the line shall be blocked
until the rail is changed.
9 Equipment Used to
Pass Trains over Broken
or Defective Rails
RAILTRACK 7
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 8 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
The general requirements for the use of such equipment shall be as set out in
section 6.6.1 for temporary rail joints.
Use of very short pieces of sawn or disc cut rail held in the gap of a broken rail
by a temporary rail clamping system shall be subject to the following
requirements:
Use of short lengths of rail with a temporary rail joint at either end to replace a
broken rail shall be subject to the following requirements:
the short rail shall be supported by at least three sound, well packed
sleepers;
the initial gap at each temporary rail joint shall not exceed 10mm;
the temporary joint shall not be a fly-fished joint;
the maximum permitted speed shall be 20mph;
the other requirements for temporary rail joints set out in 6.6 are met.
the joints are inspected after 24 hours and a permanent repair is effected
within 48 hours.
All equipment used to pass trains over broken or defective rails shall be
inspected after use to confirm the equipments continuing fitness for purpose.
8 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 9 of 32
Appendix A
Recommended Action to be Taken on
Discovery of Broken Rails
A1 Charts Giving
Minimum Actions
All charts are to be read in conjunction with the notes given at the end of this
Appendix.
RAILTRACK 9
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 10 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
10 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 11 of 32
RAILTRACK 11
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 12 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
12 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 13 of 32
Longitudinal split
Is the split at a
joint? YES
Impose 5mph
NO ESR
RAILTRACK 13
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 14 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
Railhead damage
NO
Impose 5mph
Is the rail ESR
damaged or YES
distorted either
vertically or
laterally by more
than 10mm?
Impose
NO 20mph ESR
14 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 15 of 32
A2 Notes to Charts in
Appendix A
A2.1 Notes referenced in charts A1.1 to A1.5 inclusive
1. Block the line if the break at a welded joint is within 3m of another welded
or fishplated joint.
2. Block the line if the break is more than 50mm out of vertical from head to
foot of rail.
4. No wheels less than 450mm diameter should pass over the break.
5. A short length of sawn or disk cut rail of suitable full rail section should be
clamped in position to provide wheel support and guidance.
7. The time limit for the arrangement specified is either 24 hours for Category
1A, 1, 2 or 3 lines or 48 hours for Category 4, 5 or 6 lines.
8. If the adjacent welded joint is alumino-thermic, then this welded joint should
also be clamped.
9. Block the line if the break is in the foot on both sides of the foot. Impose
5mph ESR if the break is in the foot on one side of the foot.
10. Only clamping systems designed for gaps over 75mm should be used.
These systems should be approvedl for this specific application. They
should be used strictly in accordance with manufacturers instructions and
the type approval certificate.
c. The condition and packing of the two adjacent sleepers on each side of the
break should be sufficient to support the rail.
e. The size of the gap between rail ends or the length of pieces missing should
be measured (not estimated).
f. Block the line if the break is in an S&C rail that is free to move (for
example, a switch rail). The minimum actions set out in the tables only
apply to breaks in S&C where the break is in a rail that is bolted to and
supported by S&C blocks or another form of support.
g. Block the line if any cracks extend from the break into the web.
RAILTRACK 15
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 16 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
Appendix B
Recommended Actions to be Taken on
Discovery of Defects in Rolled non-AMS
Rails
B1 Table of Minimum
Actions
The table is to be read in conjunction with the notes given at the end of this
Appendix.
16 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 17 of 32
RAILTRACK 17
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 18 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
B2.3 Notes
Code Notes
L Report battered rail ends as Untestable where applicable
N Wheelburns cannot be ultrasonically tested; track having continuous
wheelburns should be rerailed
O Interpretation of timescales within bands of action. The definitive
date for removal should consider:
where the defect is located;
annual tonnage over the defect;
axle weights;
permissible and enhanced permissible speeds;
local track conditions.
P Rails reported as untestable because of rail head shape or ballast
scars should be considered for reprofiling and retesting
Q When assessing multiple defects for corrective action then any
action taken should be based upon the largest defect present
S Where it is discovered that a crack is extending into the rail head
and / or foot then an ESR of 5mph should be imposed
T If it is not possible to fit temporary rail clamping system then the
minimum action is to impose a 20mph ESR and change rail within 36
hours
18 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 19 of 32
Code Notes
U Bulging means an increase of 2mm or more in the width of head /
web
V S&C: In S&C layouts where, because of the complexities of the
design of the units or because there are delays in the supply of
replacements, it is not possible to adhere strictly to the minimum
actions stipulated, then the action to be taken should ensure that the
risk to trains is as low as reasonably practicable
W Replace with a wide gap weld if possible (wide gap weld not
available for AMS). If this is not possible, fit temporary rail clamping
system and replace weld within 7 days
X Appoint a watchman
Y Engineers specified timescale should not exceed the laid down
frequency of ultrasonic inspection
Z Report extent and location for consideration of rail grinding
RAILTRACK 19
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 20 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
Appendix C
Recommended action to be taken on
discovery of defects in rolled AMS rails
C1 Table of Minimum
Actions
The table is to be read in conjunction with the notes given at the end of this
Appendix.
20 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 21 of 32
RAILTRACK 21
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 22 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
22 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 23 of 32
,'dd *
( )
*'dd *'dd
RAILTRACK 23
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 24 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
C2.4 Notes
Code Notes
L Report battered rail ends as Untestable where applicable
N Wheelburns cannot be ultrasonically tested; track having continuous
wheelburns should be rerailed
O Interpretation of timescales within bands of action: The definitive
date for removal should consider:
where the defect is located;
annual tonnage over the defect;
axle weights;
permissible and enhanced permissible speeds;
local track conditions.
P Rails reported as untestable because of rail head shape or ballast
scars should be considered for reprofiling and retesting
Q When assessing multiple defects for corrective action then any
action should be based upon the largest defect present
S Where it is discovered that a crack is extending into the rail head
and / or foot then an ESR of 5mph should be imposed
T If it is not possible to fit temporary rail clamping system then the
minimum action is to impose a 20mph ESR and change rail within 36
hours
U Bulging means an increase of 2mm or more in the width of head /
web
V S&C: In S&C layouts where, because of the complexities of the
design of the units or because there are delays in the supply of
replacements, it is not possible to adhere strictly to the minimum
actions stipulated, then the action to be taken should ensure that the
risk to trains is as low as reasonably practicable
W Replace with a wide gap weld if possible (wide gap weld not
available for AMS). If this is not possible, fit temporary rail clamping
system and replace weld within 7 days
X Appoint a watchman
Y Engineers specified timescale should not exceed the laid down
frequency of ultrasonic inspection
Z Report extent and location for consideration of rail grinding
24 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 25 of 32
Appendix D
Recommended Action to be Taken on
Discovery of Defects in Cast Rails and
Crossings
D1 Tables of Minimum
Actions
The tables are to be read in conjunction with the notes given at the end of this
Appendix.
RAILTRACK 25
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 26 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
Figure 1
Minimum actions for cracks discovered within fishplate limits
(,dd+*8%@ejg\Zkkn`Z\Xn\\b
),dd+*9%@ejg\Zk[X`cp+(9%,dg_<JIN +):%,dg_<JIN
+*:%)'dg_+(8%)'dg_<JIN +)9%)'dg_<JIN
<JIN
+*;%,dg_+)9%)'dg_<JIN
<JIN +)8%@ejg\Zk[X`cp
),dd
=`j_gcXk\
c`d`k
N 48ggf`ekXNXkZ_dXe
Notes to figure 1
1. In all cases where a transverse crack is found to extend from the running
surface to a position hidden by the fishplates, the circumstances should be
investigated to establish whether the crack is associated with another defect
that might compromise the safe passage of trains.
2. If there is more than one transverse crack extending from the running
surface to a position hidden by the fishplates, the line should be blocked.
26 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 27 of 32
D1.2 Cast monobloc, cast centre and cast vee AMS crossings only
Leg-ends
Figure 2
Minimum actions for cracks discovered within leg-ends but outside
fishplate limits
(,dd +.8%@ejg\Zkkn`Z\Xn\\b
),dd +.9%@ejg\Zk[X`cp +.:
)'dg<JIN
.,dd :fie\i
+.:%)'dg_<JIN
+/;%,dg_<JIN
+.;%,dg_<JIN
+/:%)'dg_ .,dd
<JIN
=`j_gcXk\c`d`k
+/9%@ejg\Zk[X`cp
*,dd
,'dd
N 48ggf`ekXNXkZ_dXe =ffkk`g
+/8%@ejg\Zkkn`Z\Xn\\b
RAILTRACK 27
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 28 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
28 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 29 of 32
RAILTRACK 29
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 30 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
D2 Notes to Tables of
Minimum Actions
1. Where the casting width is less than 70mm the limiting defect width will be
50% of that width.
2. Where the casting width is 70mm or more then the limiting defect will be
35mm.
3. Weld repairs should be undertaken on any casting where metal has broken
out.
30 RAILTRACK
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Recommended Action to be Taken on Date October 2000
Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail Page 31 of 32
Appendix E
Recommended Action to be Taken on
Discovery of Cracked or Broken Fishplates
E1 Table of Minimum
Actions
The table is to be read in conjunction with the notes given at the end of this
Appendix.
E2 Notes to table of
minimum actions
1. These minimum actions apply to all types of fishplates between all rail
sections.
2. The table sets out the minimum action. The situation at any particular joint
should be reviewed by a competent person and if necessary more restrictive
conditions applied.
3. Where present, the joint in the opposite rail should be complete, well
supported and with intact fishplates to enable trains to be passed over the
joint. If both joints have broken fishplates then the line should be blocked
until the fishplates are replaced.
4. Where there is any doubt as to the ability of the two sleepers either side of
the joint to hold the rail(s) to line, level and gauge where the fishplates are
broken, then it will be necessary to either (a) provide additional or alternative
support to the rails or (b) block the line until the fishplates are changed and
the defective sleepers are replaced. This is especially important where the
track is supported on concrete sleepers.
5. Both fishplates at a joint shall be replaced, even if only one of the fishplates
has been broken or cracked. All other components used to form the joint
shall also be replaced at the time the fishplates are changed. (GC/RT5022
section 8.3).
RAILTRACK 31
Withdrawn Document
Uncontrolled When Printed
Railtrack Approved Code of Practice
GC/RC5522
Issue One
Date October 2000 Recommended Action to be Taken on
Page 32 of 32 Discovery of a Broken or Defective Rail
References
The Catalogue of Railway Group Standards and the Railway Group Standards
CD-ROM give the current issue number and status of documents published by
the Safety & Standards Directorate.
32 RAILTRACK