13/07/2010 e-CIMS News: CIMS Responds to Ske…

For Immediate Release

CIMS Responds to the Publication of an Extremely Skewed Study on the

Safety of Homebirth
Raleigh, NC (July 9, 2010)‐The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS) is outraged
that the publishers of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) accepted a
poorly designed and methodologically unsound study in which authors concluded there is a 3‐
fold increase in neonatal mortality in planned home births compared with planned hospital
birth.

"In our analysis of multiple studies from countries worldwide," stated CIMS Chair Michelle
Kendell, MBA, AAHCC, "CIMS found that the authors of the study included confounding data,
such as outdated and low‐quality studies, low‐risk and high‐risk mothers, babies born preterm,
babies unintentionally born at home, births attended by unqualified providers, and data from
birth certificates that researchers have found to be notoriously inaccurate."

Although the authors acknowledged that most of the articlesreviewed had similar outcomes of
low neonatal mortality, they based their conclusion on statistics drawn from questionable and
poor quality studies.

Furthermore, the study's lead investigator Joseph R. Wax, MD, and his co‐authors inexplicably
eliminated the only high‐quality study of planned homebirths in the U.S. that showed excellent
health outcomes for infants and their mothers when attended by certified professional
midwives. (Johnson & Daviss BMJ 2005).

In a press release, the American College of Nurse‐Midwives, a CIMS Organizational Member,

reported, "the authors' conclusion differs significantly from findings of many recent high‐
quality studies on home birth outcomes which found no significant differences in perinatal
outcomes between planned home and planned hospital births."

Other research conducted by the CIMS Expert Work Group found that planned home births with
a qualified care provider resulted in similar, not greater, perinatal mortality rates compared
with a similar low‐risk population of women having hospital births, despite lower intervention
rates, including electronic fetal monitoring, use of IVs, pain medication, instrumental
deliveries, and cesarean sections.

Lamaze International, a CIMS Organizational Member, also questioned the study's conclusion.
Amy Romano, MSN, CNM, researcher and contributor on Lamaze International's Science &
Sensibility blog, wrote, "high quality studies, conducted in low‐risk women in integrated
maternity care systems, find no excess risk for babies and significant benefits for mothers."

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that babies born at home are less likely to be
born preterm and low birth weight compared to babies born in the hospital.

campaign.constantcontact.com/rende… 1/3
13/07/2010 e-CIMS News: CIMS Responds to Ske…
Mary Lawlor, CPM, president of the National Association of Certified Professional Midwives, a
CIMS Organizational Member, stated the study "is far from the high‐quality rigorous review that
health care providers and the public expect."

Also, commenting on the study, Geradine Simkins, CNM, MSN, president of the Midwives
Alliance of North America, a CIMS Organizational Member, stated, "The American public,
particularly women in the childbearing years and those who care for them, have a right to high
quality research on childbirth. Research literature should not be used to cause undue alarm or
limit a woman's choice regarding care providers, including skilled midwives, and place of birth."

The study at the heart of this debate, "Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth
vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis", originally intended for print publication in the
September 2010 issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), was
published online on July 1. Researchers and critics suspect that the early release was politically
motivated to discredit midwives who attend the majority of home births in the U.S. and to
discourage legislators from passing increasingly pro‐midwife state legislation such as New York
State's Midwifery Modernization Act (Bill S5007a/A8117b), which passed on June 28 with
overwhelming bipartisan support, providing autonomous practice for all licensed midwives
working in all settings.

CIMS' advisor, Dr. Michael C. Klein, a senior scientist at the Child and Family Research Institute
in Vancouver and emeritus professor of family practice and pediatrics at the University of
British Columbia believes this is "an unabashed attempt to have poor science cover‐
unsuccessfully‐a political agenda. I am very surprised that the [Journal] would publish it, let
alone call it 'Editors Choice'."

According to the CDC, the number of women opting to have their babies at home has been
increasing since 1990 and rose by 5% in 2005 and remained steady in 2006. This is significant
because it marked the first time in 14 years that the percentage of out‐of‐hospital births
increased in the U.S. In 2006 there were 4.2 million births in the U.S., of which approximately
25,000 (.59%) were home births. About 61% of home births were attended by midwives.
Among midwife‐delivered home births, one‐fourth (27%) were delivered by certified nurse‐
midwives, and nearly three‐fourths (73%) were delivered by other professional midwives.

"Women choose to have a home birth for many reasons," states Nicette Jukelevics, chair of the
CIMS Coalition Building Committee. "For financial, cultural or religions concerns, lack of
transportation in rural areas, or to give birth in a supportive, low‐intervention, familiar
environment. Other countries like Great Britain, Ireland, Canada, and the Netherlands support
women's choice for home birth. The unsubstantiated controversy against planned homebirth
with a qualified provider has been with us for many decades. It's time that women in the U.S.
have the same right and opportunity to give birth as they choose."

The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS) is a coalition of individuals and national
organizations with concern for the care and wellbeing of mothers, babies, and families. Our
mission is to promote a wellness model of maternity care that will improve birth outcomes and
substantially reduce costs. This evidence‐based mother‐, baby‐, and family‐friendly model
focuses on prevention and wellness as the alternatives to high‐cost screening, diagnosis, and
treatment programs. Media Inquiries: Denna Suko (919) 863‐9482, dsuko@motherfriendly.org

###

campaign.constantcontact.com/rende… 2/3
13/07/2010 e-CIMS News: CIMS Responds to Ske…

Forward e-CIMS!

Email Marketing by
This email was sent to st-amant.stephanie@courrier.uqam.ca by
info@motherfriendly.org.
Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy
Policy.

C oalition for Improving Maternity Services | 1500 Sunday Drive | Suite 102 | Raleigh | NC | 27607

campaign.constantcontact.com/rende… 3/3