ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION

Assessment Details
Course Code: EDU 1303

Course Name: Learning Technologies for the Classroom

Course Teacher: Diane

Task Title: Final Assessment - Portfolio: 30% (CSA)

Students create an eportfolio which features a homepage
Task Description:
and sections discussing and highlighting: role of technology
in education, examples and discussion of useful Web 2.0
and mobile technologies in teaching and learning.
(Outcomes: 1,2,3,4)

Special The Portfolio will include content prescribed by the

Instructions: teacher. A checklist will be provided to students in
Week 14.
Submit the link to your portfolio via BBLearn cover
page

Weighting: 30%

Duration/Word Not applicable

Limit:

Due Date: Week 16

Grading/Marking Your grade will be determined using the relevant

Criteria: criteria from the attached rubric.
(to be determined by
the teacher using the
attached criteria
matrix)

Late Penalty: Unless special circumstances are agreed with the

course teacher regarding late submission, work
submitted 1 working day late will be deducted 10%, 2
days late 20%, 3 days late 30% and any work
submitted more than 3 days late will get a zero mark.

Academic Honesty: Breaches of Academic Honesty will be treated with the

utmost seriousness. You are reminded the penalties for
cheating or plagiarism include dismissal from the HCT.
(for more information please refer to Academic and
Student Regulations , HCT Academic Honesty Policy ,
Student Handbook )

HCT Graduate Outcomes Addressed

1. Communication and Information Literacy *

v. 2014-05- 1
 2. Critical and Creative Thinking *

3. Global Awareness and Citizenship *

4. Technological Literacy *

5. Self-Management and Independent Learning *

6. Teamwork and Leadership

7. Vocational Competencies

8. Mathematical Literacy

v. 2014-05- 2
 ASSESSMENT COVER PAGE
Course Name: Learning Technologies for the Course Code: EDU 1303
Classroom

Instructor Diane Tzovanis

Name:

Task Title: Final Assessment (#3)

Due Date: Week 15 Date

Submitted:

Student
Name:
Student ID: Section:

Late Penalty:
Unless special circumstances are agreed with the course teacher regarding late
submission, work submitted 1 working day late will be deducted 10%, 2 days late
20%, 3 days late 30% and any work submitted more than 3 days late will get a
zero mark.

Academic Honesty:
Breaches of Academic Honesty will be treated with the utmost
seriousness. You are reminded the penalties for cheating or plagiarism
include dismissal from the HCT.
(for more information please refer to Academic and Student Regulations , HCT
Academic Honesty Policy , Student Handbook )

Student Declaration:
This assignment is entirely my own work except where I have duly acknowledged
other sources in the text and listed those sources at the end of the assignment. I
have not previously submitted this work to the HCT. I understand that I may be
orally examined on my submission

ACHIEVEMENT INDICATO

Achievement that does not meet

requirements Achievem
Achievement that
satisfactor
minimally meets the
the co
Signifi cantly below course Below course course requirements
GRADING/MARK require
requirements requirement
ING CRITERIA s
Assessment Clearly achievement
has not been does not that
submitted at meet the narrowly
all, is not- requireme does not
existent or nts meet the
requirement

v. 2014-05- 3
 not carried
out
s

Letter Grade F D D+ C- C

Percentage for 0 30 59 60 63 64 66
67 70
Gradebook 69 73

GENERAL CRITERIA (1-10)

1. Research Little or no Information presented Some information has Adequate in

Identification and information is insufficient or does been gathered from has been ga
investigation of a presented not relate sufficiently readily available sources from readily
range of appropriate to the task; there may applying standard sources app
academic and/ or be evidence of techniques. Information standard tec
cultural sources rudimentary research is sometimes inaccurate Information
generally ac

This criteria is about the range of artefacts you present on your portfolio and the accurac

Grading/Marking
Comments:

3. Explanation, Explanation and Explanation and Some explanation and Explanation

description, and/or reasoning is wholly reasoning is not easily reasoning is discernible, reasoning is
justification lacking. May discernible, complete though not always well-formed,
demonstrate a total or logical. Main points complete and/or logical and logical.
Logical reasoning, misunderstanding of lack support. in places. Key points main points
supported back up and the task. may be significantly backed-up, t
critical thinking: lacking in support. not always w
compare and contrast sufficient su
evidence an
examples, a
required.

This criteria is about the explanations and justifications you make for the artefacts and in

v. 2014-05- 4
 Grading/Marking
Comments:

5. Subject Unable to evidence Limited knowledge of Some evidence of Generally ac

knowledge or articulate basic subject. Information understanding key understandi
Understanding and principles and may be significantly aspects of the subject, aspects of th
application of subject knowledge related to irrelevant, incomplete but details are lacking. subject. Som
knowledge and the subject. and/or inaccurate Some irrelevancies and irrelevancies
underlying principles Information may be making information inaccuracies inaccuracies
irrelevant, hard to follow
incomplete and/or logically.
inaccurate.

Grading/Marking
Comments:

This criteria is about your knowledge of the educations system, schools, and teaching an

7. Reflection Consistent lack of Sporadic evidence of Some evidence of insight Adequate ev

Management of evidence of reflection not followed and thoughtful reflection. insight and t
learning through reflection for through consistently. Developing an reflection. G
reflection learning. No Incomplete awareness awareness of strengths has an awar
awareness of of personal strengths and weaknesses strengths an
personal strengths and weaknesses weaknesses
and weaknesses in
relation to task

Grading/Marking
Comments:

This criteria is about your ability to show your thinking about your teaching practice expe

UAGE CRITERIA APPLIED BACHELOR (11-13)

The whole text is Mostly unclear with Sometimes clear, with Generally clear and Clearly expressed, C
unclear. Errors are patches of patches of confusion. accurate. Errors can with only occasional t
numerous and cause significant break Accuracy is inconsistent. cause errors that do not C
r, significant down. Errors can Errors cause misunderstanding in cause a
misunderstanding. cause significant misunderstanding. places. Still some misunderstanding. a
es misunderstanding Correction required. correction required. Requiring a minimal c
and require amount of correction.
numerous
corrections.

ng
ts:

This criteria is about the accuracy of your English, in particular spelling, grammar and punctuation.

There is no evidence Significant Some inconsistencies in Structure and style Only occasional lapses S
re of style, structure or inconsistencies in style and structure. generally appropriate. in structure and style l
organization. style, structure and/ Organization not fully Mostly logical conventions. Main a
or organization. logical. organization. points are clear and A
logically organized. t

ng
ts:

This criteria is about how well you have organized your portfolio, the effectiveness of links, consistency of design and structure

v. 2014-05- 5
v. 2014-05- 6