Você está na página 1de 86

EP HSE

HSE-MS Audit Questions EP HSE

Audit :

1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.1 Visibility

3.1.1.1 Visibility assessment level

1 Do leaders communicate HSE expectations to employees reporting 1


to them?

3.1.1.1 Visibility assessment level

1 Do leaders discuss and review with employees and contractors 2


progress against meeting specific 'results' and 'activity' HSE
targets. This usually takes place at staff appraisal and pre contract
award?

2 Are there regular management HSE statements demonstrating 2


commitment at the highest level?

2 Is there sufficient visible demonstration of commitment to HSE at 2


different management levels?
- Does this notably include putting HSE matters high on the
agenda of meetings (Board downwards)?

2 Is there a clear message that everyone is responsible for managing 2


HSE as part of their individual activities?

2 In visibly demonstrating their commitment to HSE, do line 2


supervisors lead by example?
- setting a personal example in day-to-day work e.g wearing correct
PPE?
- attendance at monthly departmental HSE meetings?
- attendance at and chairing own HSE meetings?
- attending subordinates HSE meetings?
- actively supporting daily safety discussions and 'toolbox'
meetings?

2 Who is responsible for management inspection follow-up? 2


- Does the management team receive copies of follow-up reports?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 1
1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.1 Visibility

3 In visibly demonstrating their commitment to HSE, do managers 2


lead by example?
- Setting a personal example in day-to-day work and following the
company rules?
- Attendance at and chairing management level HSE meetings?

3 Is there an active HSE dialogue between company and contractor 2


management?

3 Do line supervisors communicate company HSE objectives and 2


targets to subordinate staff and contractors?

3 Does the workforce think that line supervision consider HSE 2


matters to be an integral part of managing the business?

3.1.1.1 Visibility assessment level

1 Do leaders actively participate in HSE activities such as training, 3


reward and recognition schemes, industry/contractor workshops,
conferences and audits?

2 Is there an effective management inspections programme, covering 3


company/contractor facilities and operations?
- Is there an annual schedule for management inspections?
- How often is the schedule cancelled or changed?

2 Does the management inspection team include: 3


- At least one senior manager?
- The HSE department?
- The line?
- Medical department?

2 Is there feedback to the contractor management? 3


- Are minutes made and distributed?
- how long after the inspection?

3 Is there visible demonstration of commitment to HSE at different 3


management levels?
- Communicating the importance of HSE considerations in
business decisions?
- Recognition of performance when HSE objectives and targets are
achieved?

3 Do managment attend HSE meetings/conferences outside 3


company?
- Participate in internally- and externally-driven HSE initiatives?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 2
1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.1 Visibility

3 In visibly demonstrating their commitment to HSE, do managers 3


lead by example:
- Participation in the execution of HSE plans?
- Being actively involved in HSE activities and campaigns?
- Being actively involved in HSE review and analysis sessions?
- Discussing HSE with employees at all levels?
- Coaching employees who need to do better?

3 Do senior management participate in work site visits and 3


departmental/subordinate HSE meetings?
- Reading of and acting on HSE reports?
- Conducting HSE audits or inspections personally (including
remote sites)?
- Are these documented?

3 Do line supervisors conduct regular HSE visits, inspections and 3


audits to site?

3 During visits/inspections/audits, are activities ever stopped 3


because they were concluded to be unsafe?

3 How frequently do Senior management and Department heads 3


make HSE inspections?
- Are the inspections conducted following an agreed programme
and procedure or established practice?
- Are records (itinerary and action items) kept of their visits?

3 During management site visits and inpections: 3


- Do managers wear the required PPE?
- Is Unsafe Act Auditing a routine feature of these inspections?
- Are operations staff interviewed?
- Is there a structured list of questions?

3 What is the general status of follow-up on management inspections 3


for the audited operations?
- Are highlights of the inspection discussed in management
meetings and or HSE meetings?
- Are lateral learning points distributed to relevant staff?

3 Does Contractor Corporate and Country Management carry out 3


inspections?
- On a scheduled basis?
- Are findings documented?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 3
1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.1 Visibility

3.1.1.1 Visibility assessment level

1 Do leaders drive the process for HSE excellence? 4


- Do all levels 'own' the HSE management process?
- Do the documented surveys of employee perceptions confirm
that employees believe the company is committed to HSE?

2 Is there structured and repeated management HSE communication 4


to highlight to staff that:
- Supervisors are accountable for their subordinates' HSE
performance?
- Following HSE rules is a condition of employment?

2 Do management issue HSE communications to highlight to 4


contractors that meeting company HSE standards is:
- A prerequisite for continued employment under existing
contracts?

3 Do managers at all levels ensure that decisions/practices are 4


consistent with HSE policy and objectives?

3 Have management provided a culture in which staff and 4


contractors are well informed and motivated towards improving
HSE?
- Encouragement of employees' suggestions for measures to

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 4
1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.2 Proactive in target
setting

3.1.1.2 Proactive in target setting assessment level

1 Do leaders participate in the review of reactive indicators i.e. 1


'results' such as LTIs, spills, emission.
- Are these reviews documented?
- Is there evidence of effective follow-up?

3 Are investigations of serious incidents led by Managers of an 1


appropriate level?

3.1.1.2 Proactive in target setting assessment level

1 Do leaders participate in the development of objectives and target 2


setting for H,S & E management 'activities', (proactive indicators)
as well as 'result' indicators?

3.1.1.2 Proactive in target setting assessment level

1 Do leaders jointly develop and discuss and review HSE targets, 3


'results' and 'activity' improvement with employees and
contractors?

2 Do managers require HSE plans from their subordinates and 3


visibly verify implementation of HSE plans and actions they

3 Does management review corporate performance against objectives 3


and targets?
- At least quarterly?
- Is a summary of that review available?

3.1.1.2 Proactive in target setting assessment level

1 Do they ensure that all staff have been given pro-active and 4
re-active targets?
- Is there recognition of performance when HSE objectives and
targets are achieved?

3 Have line supervisors received/set specific HSE tasks and targets 4


(individually and/or as related to the department/contractor)?
- Do line supervisors set challenging HSE targets for all
subordinates?

3 How and how often is progress versus targets reviewed? 4

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 5
1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.3 Informed involvement

3.1.1.3 Informed involvement assessment level

1 Are leaders not convinced that the systematic management of HSE 1


and measurement of the effectiveness of such a system is more
important than the reactive measurements such as LTIs?

3.1.1.3 Informed involvement assessment level

1 Do leaders review the progress both in the development and the 2


content of HSE - management systems and HSE Cases and make
available the resources and expertise to meet the targets?

2 Do senior management hold subordinates accountable for 2


conducting HSE meetings on the following minimum basis:
- Departmental management: Monthy?
- Work site management: Weekly?
- Team supervision: Daily 'safety topic' or 'tool box' meetings?

3 Do managers stimulate full recognition of HSE risks across the 2


entire spectrum of the business?

3 Do managers actively support consistent application and/or 2


development of the various risk recognition and documentation
techniques, e.g.:
- HSE Cases,
- Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs)?
- Health Risk Assessments (HRAs)?

3 Has management provided an effective structure and sufficient 2


resources to manage HSE?
- Has this structure been communicated to and is it understood at
all staff levels?
- Do managers provide sufficient resources to enable management
of HSE risks ?

3 Does the Chief Executive chair the Management HSE Committee? 2

- Are the meetings held at a minimum quarterly frequency?


- Do managers verify that regular HSE meetings are held at all

3 Do the workforce see management and line supervision taking 2


action and providing resources to support their stated policy and
objectives?

3 Do line supervisors enforce formal and on-the-job training and 2


allocate sufficient time to allow for adequate HSE training of
subordinates?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 6
1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.3 Informed involvement

3.1.1.3 Informed involvement assessment level

1 Are Management fully aware of the priority areas for 3


improvement in the HSE-MS identified during Management
Reviews and of the status of the follow up?

3 Has management provided funds: 3


- For hardware to allow elimination of risks where possible?
- Appropriate staff resources to allow operation maintaining the
risks at ALARP ?

3 Do managers ensure that their staff: 3


- Are adequately empowered to effect HSE improvements?
- Have and use proper work procedures?
- Are fully trained and understand their equipment and jobs?
- Are given adequate time for training needs?

3 Does Management ensure that HSE aspects of business decisions 3


are evaluated and taken into account before final decisions are
reached?

3 Do managers at all levels ensure that conflicts between HSE and 3


cash flow are effectively balanced?
- Do they refuse to order or sanction 'short-cuts' or to save time or
money as a compromise on agreed HSE standards?

3 Do management and supervisors have credibility with the work 3


force on HSE matters?

3 Is there a formal statement of mandatory HSE requirements and 3


does line supervision personally ensure all staff are fully aware of
them?
- For example:
- compliance with HSE policy, standards and procedures?
- formal HSE training?
- on-the-job HSE training?
- wearing of PPE?
- equipment and tools to be used?
- response in HSE emergencies?

3.1.1.3 Informed involvement assessment level

1 Are Managers personally involved in improvement efforts 4


resulting from Management Reviews?

3 Do management provide adequate and timely response to 4


improvement suggestions and initiatives from subordinates?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 7
1. LEADERSHIP AND COMMITMENT 3.1.1.3 Informed involvement

3 Do employees consider that management are committed to HSE 4


and are serious about the priority of HSE?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 8
2. POLICY AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 3.1.2.1 Content

3.1.2.1 Content assessment level

1 Is the Company HSE policy statement dated and signed by the 1


current Chief Executive?

3.1.2.1 Content assessment level

0 Does the Company HSE policy specifically highlight that 2


individual staff are:
- Accountable for ensuring HSE systems are in place prior to
commencing work?
- Empowered to suspend his own or others' work where the risk is
unacceptable?

1 Do the company HSE Policy and Commitment statements comply 2


with Group requirements as a minimum and reflect company
circumstances?

1 Are there specific and clear daughter policies are available for all 2
areas relevant to the OU?

3.1.2.1 Content assessment level

1 Are the Contractors' HSE policies consistent with the Company 3


HSE policy?
- Are the contractor's HSE policy statements dated and signed by
their current Chief Executive?

1 Is there a Company statement on Joint Ventures (JV) available? 3

2 Has the Company developed specific, clear and concise policies in 3


the areas of:
- Drugs (medicines and illegal drugs)?
- Alcohol abuse?
- Road safety?
- Smoking?
- Gas flaring or venting?
- Others (social aspects, effluents)?

2 Is Contractors HSE-MS compatible with Companys? 3

2 Do Contractors have HSE related daughter policies? 3

2 Do contractors have HSE related daughter policies consistent with 3


company daughter policies?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 9
2. POLICY AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 3.1.2.1 Content

2 Does the Contractor HSE policy specifically highlight that 3


individual staff are:
- Accountable for ensuring HSE systems are in place prior to
commencing work?
- Empowered to suspend his own or others' work where the risk is
unacceptable?

3.1.2.1 Content assessment level

1 Is the HSE Policy reviewed as part of the HSE-MS review? 4

1 Are comments sought from stakeholders during the review 4


process?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 10
2. POLICY AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 3.1.2.2 Dissemination

3.1.2.2 Dissemination assessment level

1 Do employees and contractors know where to find a copy of the 1


HSE Policy of their company?

2 Is the company HSE policy included in tender documents and is 1


the company's expectations discussed with potential contractors?

3.1.2.2 Dissemination assessment level

1 Is the current HSE Policy is prominently displayed in a language 2


understood by all employees and contractors?
- Has each employee a personal copy of the HSE Policy?

3 Is the Company HSE Policy prominently posted on bulletin 2


boards, in managers' offices, in manuals and handbooks?

3 Do company employees as well as contractor staff: understand the 2


Company HSE Policy contents and context?

3 Is the Contractor HSE Policy prominently posted on bulletin 2


boards, in managers' offices, in manuals and handbooks?

3.1.2.2 Dissemination assessment level

1 Is the personal relevance of the HSE Policy to all new employees 3


(company & contractor) explained to them by their immediate
supervisor?
- Do supervisors discuss revised HSE policies with employees?

3 When the Contractor's HSE policy was issued, was it handed to 3


and discussed with
- Each Contractor employee by his/her Line Manager?
- Was the same done with sub-contractors?

3.1.2.2 Dissemination assessment level

1 Can employees and contractors explain what they must do in their 4


work so that their company can fulfil the requirements of it's HSE
Policy?
- Is the HSE Policy readily available to neighbouring communities
in an understandable format?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 11
2. POLICY AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 3.1.2.3 Strategic Objectives

3.1.2.3 Strategic Objectives assessment level

1 Is there an HSE MS in place or under development which includes 1


an HSE Plan to meet the OU strategic objectives.

2 Are challenging HSE objectives set? 1

2 Has actual performance been taken account of when setting 1

2 Have Contractors set Objectives and annual HSE targets? 1

3 Has the Sustainability Assessment Guide (EP 950373) been 1


reviewed by the HSE department?
- Has the concept of SD been communicated within the Company?

3.1.2.3 Strategic Objectives assessment level

1 Are the HSE targets described in the HSE Plan consistent with 2
those of the Shell Group (EP95-0140)?
- Is there a transparent cascade between OU corporate targets and
unit targets?

2 In setting Objectives, has Management considered the overall risk 2


levels of its activities and identified those critical operations and
installations, which require a fully documented demonstration that
risks have been reduced to ALARP?

2 Do the company's strategic objectives and annual HSE targets link 2


to the company HSE commitment and policy?

2 Have challenging targets (for 1 year and 5 year) been set in line 2
with SIEP requirements?
(ref EP 95-0140) for all of the following:
1 Fatalities
2 LTIF
3 TRCF
4 Vehicle Injury Rate (per million km driven)
5 Total Recordable Occupational Illness Frequency
6 Gas flaring
7 Hydrocarbon emissions to air
8 Halon losses
9 CFC losses
10 Oil in produced water
11 Oil spills
12 Oil from oil-based mud and cuttings discharged to water
13 Energy reduction
14 Waste reduction

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 12
2. POLICY AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 3.1.2.3 Strategic Objectives

2 Are Contractor Objectives and Targets consistent with Companies 2


Objectives and Targets?
- Have Contractor objectives and targets been effectively cascaded
down to operational levels?

2 Has the Company assessed what Sustainable Development means 2


to them and how they may contribute towards it?

3.1.2.3 Strategic Objectives assessment level

1 Do audits confirm that the HSE Plan is functioning? 3


- Is there a process in place to effectively monitor progress against
the HSE Plan and verify the HSE results?

2 Has the Company developed objectives and a strategy on 3


Sustainable Development?

3.1.2.3 Strategic Objectives assessment level

1 Are Senior managers measured on performance in setting 4


challenging targets for continuous improvement?
- Are personnel at all levels in the company assessed on
performance in achieving these targets which are included in the
HSE Plan?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 13
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.1 Roles & responsibilities
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.1 Roles & responsibilities assessment level

1 Is there a description of the current organisational structure and a 1


description of the relationships of all parties involved in the
operation including partners, contractors and regulators?

2 Is the Company Organisation adequate for its workload? 1


- Including development, implementation and management of the
HSE-MS?

2 Is it clearly defined whether smaller contractors fall under 1


Company responsibility, or under Contractor responsibility (i.e.
are subcontracted)?

2 Do the Company organisational structure and allocation of 1


resources reflect that handling of HSE is a line responsibility.

2 Is there a separate Company HSE organisation and if so: 1


- What are its terms of reference?
- Is the organisation adequate for its current workload?

2 Are current Company organograms available? 1


- Is distribution subject to document control?
- Are they regularly updated?

2 Does the Contractor organisational structure adequately describe 1


the relationships between:
- The various operations sections?
- Operating sections and supporting services?
- All Subcontractors?

2 Do the Contractor organisational structure and allocation of 1


resources reflect that handling of HSE is a line responsibility.

2 Is there a separate Contractor HSE organisation and if so: 1


- What are its terms of reference?
- Is the organisation adequate for its current workload?

2 Are current contractors organograms available? 1


- Have they been distributed to appropriate Company staff?
- Are they regularly updated?

3 Are all staff and employees made aware of their HSE 1


responsibilities when joining the company?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 14
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.1 Roles & responsibilities
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.1 Roles & responsibilities assessment level

1 Does the HSE MS include a description of all HSE critical 2


activities and the HSE responsibilities of employees and
contractors in undertaking these activities. Supervisors, employees
and contractors know these?

2 Are job descriptions available for each position (company and 2


contractors)?
- Are HSE responsibilities described in these
- Are they agreed with and issued to staff?

2 Who is the Custodian of the HSE Management System? 2

3.1.3.1 Roles & responsibilities assessment level

1 Are HSE critical activities defined and known by contractors and 3


employees responsible for their implementation together with the
inputs, outputs, performance standards, verification and
competency requirements?

2 Is there an explicit right for all staff to refuse work that damages 3
one's health, is unsafe or will damage the environment?

2 Has a management representative been assigned responsibility, 3


authority and accountability for co-ordinating implementation and
maintenance of the HSE-MS?

2 Are responsibilities at departmental interfaces defined? 3


- How is co-ordination of activities across departmental boundaries
arranged?

3 Are authority levels given commensurate with assigned 3


responsibilities?

3 Is HSE fully understood and implemented in the line? 3


- At all levels in the company?
- Do Line managers and supervisors accept responsibility for all
aspects of their subordinates' HSE performance?

3 Do all employees accept responsibility for their own and 3


colleagues' safety and health protection?

3.1.3.1 Roles & responsibilities assessment level

1 Individual HSE responsibilities are known and understood by all 4


employees (company and contractor) and are maintained by
updating and revision in conjunction with the employees.

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 15
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.1 Roles & responsibilities
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3 Are responsibilities regularly reviewed and updated in conjunction 4


with staff?
- Are copies of responsibilities available with and understood by
the appropriate staff?
- Are company and contractor staff aware of their responsibilities
for HSE?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 16
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.2 HSE Advisors
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.2 HSE Advisors assessment level

1 Is quality specialist advice is readily available to line personnel on 1


all H, S & E issues?
- Do HSE advisers meet relevant (regulatory) professional
requirements?

2 Have HSE advisers / focal points been nominated in the contractor 1


organisation?

2 What training has the HSE adviser(s) received? 1


- HSE Management Training?
- Environment?
- Occupational Health?

3 Are HSE advisers appropriately trained to deliver professional 1


advice within the defined scope of responsibilities and duties?

3 Is there adequate experience of line operations amongst HSE 1


advisers?

3.1.3.2 HSE Advisors assessment level

1 Is the role and reporting relationship of the HSE Advisor(s) fully 2


defined in the HSE-MS and understood by all staff?
- Do the HSE adviser(s) have direct access to the Chief Executive?

2 Is the HSE Department custodian of the HSE-MS? 2

3 Is there an appropriate balance between line staff and HSE 2

3 Is there a line HSE focal point? 2


- Does he report to the appropriate organisational level?
- Are his/her responsibilities and duties documented?
- Are his/her responsibilities and duties known to other staff?

3.1.3.2 HSE Advisors assessment level

1 Is HSE fully understood and implemented in the line and only 3


specialist advice is required from HSE advisors?
- Is this advice sought and acted upon?

3 Do the line managers accept responsibility for implementing the 3


HSE-MS in their areas.?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 17
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.2 HSE Advisors
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.2 HSE Advisors assessment level

1 Can HSE advisors demonstrate that they regularly support the 4


drive for continuous improvement in HSE-MSs across the
operation?
- By proactive challenge?
- By comparison with and promotion of best Group/Industry
practice?

3 Is the HSE department involved in monitoring the quality and 4


timely completion of HSE Cases?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 18
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.3 Resourcing
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.3 Resourcing assessment level

1 Has there been a review of the resourcing levels required to 1


conduct the operations, notably taking into account:
- Risk level?
- Emergency procedures?
- Leave and Competency levels?

3 Are the manpower review results realistic and have they been 1
agreed with appropriate supervisors and line managers?

3 Is the agreed manning in line with manning philosophies and facts 1


e.g.?
- Facilities manning e.g. ad-hoc, day shift only, 24 hr/day?
- Activities manning e.g. single person visits, buddy system?
- Realistic transport times to reach facilities?

3 Are forecasted activity levels adequately planned for? 1

3 What are the leave rotation schedules for various staff? 1


- Is this strictly adhered to?
- Is proper hand-over in place?
- Do any staff spend excessively long periods on-site without
break?

3.1.3.3 Resourcing assessment level

1 Is the establishment described or referred in the HSE MS or HSE 2


Case?

2 Are there formal procedures or policies which describe: 2


- Minimum number of people required/allowed at the
facility/worksite at any one time?
- Manning requirements for certain hazardous activities?

2 Are there formal procedures or policies which describe: 2


- When accessing heights?
- Tank dipping?
- Electrical maintenance?
- HV switching?
- Accessing bilge tanks?
- Night operations?

3 Have adequate resources been provided for effective 2


development/implementation and management of the HSE-MS?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 19
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.3 Resourcing
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.3 Resourcing assessment level

1 Does the actual resourcing meet the requirements described in the 3


HSE MS or HSE Case in number and competency?

3 Does the current establishment (Company and Contractor) meet 3


the defined criteria (as described in the HSE-MS)?
- Approved establishment?
- Actual manpower in place?
- Competency?

3 Is the HSE Department adequately staffed to fulfil its role? 3

3 Is the Contractor manning levels adequate for its workload 3


including development, implementation and management of the
HSE-MS/HSE Case?
- Approved contractor establishment?
- Actual contractor manpower in place?
- Competency?

3 Are the contractor manpower levels adequate to comply with the 3


requirements as per the contract:?
- Are HSE requirements met?
- Is there adequate supervision?

3 Is excessive supervision required by company staff to ensure 3


contractually prescribed work quantity and quality is being
delivered?

3 If a significant percentage of staff is temporary, is training and 3


hand-over adequately handled?

3 Is facility manning and/or activity execution ever undertaken in 3


non-conformance with the formal procedures and policies?

3 Are manning levels adequate to allow regular worksite visits by 3


foremen and supervisors?
- How often do these worksite visits take place (daily, weekly,
monthly)

3.1.3.3 Resourcing assessment level

1 Are changes to resourcing levels and competencies and associated 4


risks assessed as part of the change control procedure?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 20
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.3 Resourcing
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

1 Are supervisors trained and encouraged to recognise the symptoms 4


of under-resourcing (stress, incident causation, overtime levels,
etc.)?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 21
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance assessment level

1 All staff and employees are made aware of their HSE 1


responsibilities when joining the company.

2 Is there an initial formal induction for new and transferred staff? 1


- Is the induction programme available to company and contractor
staff?

2 Does the work site induction training cover: 1


- Environmental hazards and effects?
- Fire?
- Legislative requirements?
- General safety rules and procedures?
- Hazard awareness and reporting?
- Occupational health?
- Other emergency response?
- Security?

2 Are records kept of company and contractors employees who 1


attended the HSE induction?

2 Are new managers and supervisors given a company HSE 1


orientation programme?
- Is there a written standard for the orientation programme?
- How many hours is orientation programme?
- How soon after arrival is the programme given?
- Are records kept?

3 Is it mandatory that all new company and contractor employees 1


attend the induction before they are allowed to work on site?
- How long does the induction training take?
- Does a member of senior management introduce the induction
briefing?
- is there any involvement of line supervision in the induction
briefings?

3 Is HSE induction training given to contractor staff? 1


- Does the HSE induction training for contractor staff cover all
contractor staff?

3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance assessment level

1 Is there a competency assurance process is in place for company 2


personnel with responsibility for HSE critical activities?
- Are the required and actual competencies of incumbants
documented?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 22
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

2 Is there a formal requirement for supervisors to develop critical 2


skills in their staff through on-the-job coaching?
- Is this documented in job descriptions and tasks and targets?

2 Is there a formal on-the-job training scheme? 2


- Which staff levels are part of this?
- How is it controlled?
- How is progress measured?
- Are progress and relative competence checks signed off by
supervisors?

2 Is there a system of HSE Management training for supervisors? 2


- What percentage of supervisors have attended such a course?

3 Has the company defined minimum competence/training and 2


experience levels for each Company staff position?
- Are minimum experience level requirements complied with?

3 Are mandatory training requirements achieved? 2


- For HSE critical positions?
- For all positions?
- Are records being kept?
- Who is responsible for updating the records?

3 Are state-of-art training aids available:? 2


- Films/videos?
- Self-teaching aids?

3 Have Company and Contractor management attended a HSE 2


management course?
(eg. Managing HSE in the Business Workshop (previous V2FA)?
What percentage of managers have attended such a course?

3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance assessment level

1 Is a competency assurance process as described in Level 2 above 3


also in place for the employees of contractors in positions with
responsibility for HSE critical activities?

2 Does the competence requirement analysis equally appraise: 3


- Company staff, contractors and sub-contractor staff?
- for all HSE critical tasks?
- for all tasks?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 23
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

2 Are staff competence requirements adequately specified in 3


contracts? do they cover:
- Specific site hazards?
- Anticipated staff turnover?
- Specific HSE training requirements?
- Medical requirements?

2 Who is responsible to check that new contractors are aware of and 3


are practising the contractual HSE competence regulations e.g.:?
- Induction training?
- Mandatory HSE training?
- Competence requirements
- Does Company verify and approve the quality of induction
training as provided by Contractors?

2 Are the contractually required contractor staff competency 3


requirements met?
- Induction training?
- Mandatory HSE training?
- Competence requirements
- Are records being kept?

2 Is there an overall programme for HSE training? 3


- Does the Programme include:
- HSE management inc all HSE-MS elements?
- Job procedures?
- Occupational health control?
- Road safety?
- Eenvironmental issues?
- Supervisory development

2 Is there a system of formal training for operators of mobile 3


equipment such as cranes, forklifts?
- Does the system include issue of formal operators
references/certificates?
- Are these certificates verified prior to allowing work to start?

2 Does supervisory development training cover: 3


- Proper job/task instruction?
- Skill development coaching?
- Concise task assignments?
- Personnel management skills?
- Communications skills?

3 Has the company/contractor defined minimum competence/training 3


and experience levels for each Contractor staff position?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 24
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3 Are competency and medical requirements for potential 3


sub-contract staff covered as well?
- How is the skill and experience level of potential sub-contract
staff specified and verified?

3 Does the system for competence verification differentiate between 3


:
- Initial recruitment for existing tasks?
- Initial recruitment for new tasks?

3 Do supervisors check the knowledge of a new addition to the 3


team?
- On trade specific skills/procedures?
- On company HSE regulations?
- On departmental HSE procedures?
- On emergency procedures?

3 Do supervisors check the knowledge of a new employees on their 3


first day on site?
- Including contractor and sub-contractor staff?
- Are records kept of these checks?
- Do records include conditions set prior to being allowed to work
on his/her own?

3 Are visitors briefed and their knowledge checked regarding specific 3


HSE procedures on the site?
- Are they briefed on the action they are to take if an alarm

3 Does the supervisor check the knowledge of staff by going through 3


a procedure with them?
- Are both existing and new procedures equally covered?
- Is this done on-site or in the office?
- How often is this repeated?
- Are there records kept

3 What on site competence checks have staff experienced 3


personally?
Were they ever asked to demonstrate competence before being
allowed to operate on their own?
- Who makes these checks?

3 Have they received training in: 3


- Firefighting individual and team based?
- First-aid? Inc Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation?
- Emergency Evacuation and Survival?
- Emergency Procedures?
- Environmental Control inc Waste mgt ?
- Operating Procedures?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 25
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3 Are training standards for Contractor and sub-contractor staff 3


equivalent?
- Notably if use is made of sub-contracted staff within the
Contractor organisation?

3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance assessment level

1 Are the competency requirements of all positions involving HSE 4


critical activities periodically reviewed and improved and the
competency of staff reassessed and gaps addressed?

2 Is there a systematic analysis of competence requirements for 4


tasks?
- Does the analysis differentiate between?
- Initial recruitment for existing tasks?
- Selection of existing staff for new activities?
- Are there documented guidelines covering the analysis of
competence requirements for tasks?

2 Is there a process defined for individuals who are found to be 4


not-yet-competent?
- Company staff?
- Contractor or sub-contractor staff?

2 Does the system notably aim at increasing competencies of staff in 4


HSE critical positions, covering e.g.:
- Job Procedures?
- Road Safety?
- Incident Investigation?
- Supervisory skills?

2 Is a database in place allowing the status of (refresher) training of 4


individuals to be easily verified?

3 Are staff not accepted in an HSE critical job until minimum 4


requirements are met?

3 Is the competence of staff regularly reviewed and appraised at 4


least annually?

3 Do staff themselves believe that they have received sufficient 4


training before being allowed to carry out their duties?
- Company staff?
- Contractor staff?
- Subcontractor staff?

3 Do line supervisors and management take a leading role in 4


on-the-job assessment and training of their subordinates?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 26
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.4 Competency Assurance
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3 Is sufficient HSE training available to all levels of the workforce? 4

4 Does the system for competence assessment and verification 4


include:
- Frequency of re-assessment?
- Method of assessment?
- Staff authorised to carry out assessment?
- Qualification requirements for assessment staff
- Documentation of results

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 27
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.5 Contractors
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.5 Contractors assessment level

1 Is Contractor HSE competence assessed in the light of the risks to 1


be managed during the contract prior to the invitation to tender and
award of contract?

2 Have contractor's HSE responsibilities been clearly defined in 1


contracts?

2 Are records kept of contractors' past HSE performance? 1

2 Does contractor performance monitoring include Health and 1


Environmental performance?

2 Are relevant HSE clauses in contracts adequate? 1

3 Is account taken of the level of risk to be managed in the Contract? 1

3 Are visits to contractors' premises part of pre-tendering and 1


evaluation procedures?

3 What assessment of contractors' HSE management potential is 1


made?

3 If a contractor with a poor HSE performance is accepted? 1


- Is money allocated for improving his performance?

3 Has the company communicated to the contractor specific: 1


- Site hazards w.r.t. health, safety and/or environment?
- Manning level requirements, relief schedules?
- Staff competence requirements?

3 Are copies of all contracts available with appropriate parties? 1


- Company site supervisors?
- Contractor site representatives?
- Are these parties familiar with the HSE relevant parts of the
contracts?

3.1.3.5 Contractors assessment level

1 Is Contractor mobilisation conditional on receiving a description 2


of:
- How major HSE risks will be systematically managed to
ALARP?
(risks with a consequence of 5A, 4B, 3C, 2D or higher on the risk
matrix (EP 95-0100)
- how the interfaces are managed on that particular contract or
project?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 28
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.5 Contractors
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3 Are contractor site inspections made prior to and during contract 2


start-up to verify that?
- Contractor staff are familiar with company practices and
procedures?
- Permit to Work?
- Journey management?
- Waste disposal?
- Hygiene?

3 Does the company prior to allowing the contractor to sublet the 2


work vet the contents of all sub-contracts terms?

3 Are the work schedules of the sub-contractor compatible with 2


applicable contractor and company HSE standards?

3 Is the value of good planning demonstrated during Contract 2


management?

3.1.3.5 Contractors assessment level

1 Is compliance with the contractors own HSE MS audited within an 3


audit programme defined in the contract.
- Are actions to be taken in the event of different levels of non
compliance defined in the contract.

3.1.3.5 Contractors assessment level

1 Are the HSE management systems of contractors subject to 4


continuous improvement during the course of projects and
contracts in consultation with the OU?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 29
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.6 Communication
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.6 Communication assessment level

1 Is there an effective hierarchy of HSE meetings at all levels within 1


Company and Contractor?

2 Are contractor HSE meetings consistent with Company ? 1


- Do sub-contractor staff attend HSE meetings?
- What level of contractor management does attend?
- Who attends from the company?
- Does the contract holder attend? How often?

2 Is the process of recording and disseminating the HSE meeting 1


proceedings adequate?
- Distribution of minutes?
- Posting on HSE bulletin boards?
- Other applicable parties (lateral learning)?

3 Does senior and middle management participate in lower levels 1


HSE meetings?
- Do they provide focus on compliance with program standards?
- Do they make special presentations on HSE topics?

3 Does the HSE meeting structure allow employees full 1


involvement?
- Does it allow employees own ideas and suggestions to be heard?

3 Are special meetings also held after an incident? 1

3 Is the process that ensures that HSE meetings are attended and/or 1
their contents disseminated adequate?
- Is attendance compulsory?
- Are staff levels in attendance?
- Has any member of top management participated?

3 Is the process that selects the topics for discussion at the HSE 1
meetings adequate?
- Are the themes for HSE meetings planned in advance?
- How are topics selected and decided?
- Incidents?
- Theme of the month?
- New plans/equipement?

3 What are workers reactions to HSE and 'tool-box' meetings? 1


- Do they give added value?
- How long do they last?
- Are purpose and contents understood by all attendees?
- Is sufficient attention paid to complications of multi-lingual
workforce?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 30
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.6 Communication
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.6 Communication assessment level

1 Is there an effective system in place for the timely transfer of HSE 2


information and feedback across all levels in the company and
contractors?
- Are all employees aware of key HSE information and
expectations?

2 Have the HSE risks and hazards of work activities been adequately 2
communicated to all company and contractor employees?
- Induction discussions/courses?
- Safety Cases?
- HSE and/or 'toolbox' meetings?

2 Are guidelines available for carrying out HSE meetings? 2


- At what frequency are meetings to be held?
- Is agenda and other reading material issued to attendees prior to
meetings?
- Who is to chair the meetings?

2 Are the communications techniques used adequate and appropriate 2


?
- Personal contact?
- Inter-active video?
- Video?
- Notice boards?

2 Are HSE bulletin boards available in sufficient quantity and in the 2


appropriate locations, carrying appropriate and current
information?
- Are up-to-date HSE performance indicators posted at HSE

2 Are focussed HSE campaigns conducted effectively? 2


- How many HSE themes were promoted within the past twelve
months?
- Was the selection of HSE themes based on critical problems?

3 Has the company adequately shared its HSE experiences with its 2
Contractors?
- At Management level?
- At Department Head level?
- How often are meetings held?
- What are the main subjects of meetings?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 31
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.6 Communication
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3 How are the general HSE rules and procedures communicated? 2


- In the language that can be understood?
- Is there a briefing or is it purely a paper communication?
- Is employee and contractor understanding verified?
- By whom, how and how often?

3 Have the potential consequences of departure from HSE critical 2


procedures and/or performance targets been adequately
communicated to all levels within the Company and Contractor?
- Risk to employee himself and colleagues?
- Disciplinary action?

3 Is there evidence of open communication on HSE 2


accidents/incidents and is its coverage adequate?

3 Are safety alerts and bulletins distributed, displayed? 2

3 Has the company disseminated adequate information on 2


emergency response procedures?
- Availability of emergency response procedures?
- Formal emergency response training courses?
- Emergency response preparedness training via exercises?

3 How are language and/or comprehension problems assessed, dealt 2


with and understanding verified?
- Do supervisors and crew have a common language?
- Are translators with work experience available in the crews?

3 Are any of the supervisors proficient in the local language? 2


- Is there a requirement for bilingual foremen in the contracts?
- Are language training courses available?

3 Are HSE signs and information available in the local language? 2

3 Are pre-job and/or tool-box meetings held, where risks and barriers 2
are discussed?
- Do these meetings cover:all of HSE?

3 Does the Company newsletter effectively communicate issues and 2


material related to HSE?
- How often is it distributed?
- Does it reach all employees?
- Do all employees comprehend and value the newsletter?

3 Are posters available and appropriately placed to support specific 2


HSE programs and current initiatives?
- Are HSE posters changed at least once each month?
- Is it clearly designated who will change HSE posters?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 32
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.6 Communication
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3 Are line management and supervisors visible and motivating in 2


setting examples by adhering to safe working practices themselves?

3 Is the need for compliance with procedures constantly and 2


consistently being discussed and encouraged ?
- During HSE meetings?
- During activity toolbox meetings?
- By supervisors during supervisory worksite visits?

3.1.3.6 Communication assessment level

1 Is there a formal process to address HSE matters raised by 3


employees, contractors, customers, government agencies and the
public?

2 Are there company focal points for dealing with the different 3
authorities?

2 Is there a check-list of reports/studies required by governmental 3


agencies?
- Does the check-list include the report date and file location?

2 What Contractor-wide and/or industry sector communication 3


forums exist?

2 Is there training available in the effective running of HSE meetings? 3

2 What specific type of HSE incentive schemes are used, if any? 3


- Small rewards to large number of people?
- Large rewards to a few people?
- Is award based on positive contribution, not accident rate?

3 Is the HSE department involved in communication regarding HSE 3


issues?

3 Are communications with the regional Police and Emergency 3


services effectively in place?

3 Are HSE contests/competitions held? 3


- Do senior or line managers present safety awards or recognition?

3 Is the meaning of the HSE performance indicators well understood 3


by all?

3 Are employees sufficiently informed on exposure sampling results 3


and records e.g. air, dust, noise, radiation?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 33
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.6 Communication
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.6 Communication assessment level

1 Is there a consultation programmes are in place to identify and act 4


upon HSE concerns of communities and other stakeholders.
- Are the HSE Policy, targets and verified performance of the
company provided in a clear format with a process for feedback.

2 Has senior management communicated the company's HSE 4


objectives and performance to Government and other authorities?

2 Is the Companys environmental performance being externally 4


verified and reported consistent with Group Policy?

2 Is there a system in place to maintain external factors awareness: 4


- Who is responsible?
- How is information disseminated?

3 Is the HSE Case and HSE-MS reviewed by the authorities? 4


- How often?

3 Are Company expectations of the Police and Emergency services 4


shared, understood and accepted by them?

3 Is there adequate awareness of external factors which might 4


influence the HSE performance and/or business of the company?
- Third party pressure groups (e.g. Greenpeace, Friends of the
Earth)?

3 Is there adequate awareness of external factors incuding: 4


- HSE problems of companies (oil and/or non-oil) operating in the
same environment?
- Governmental programs in HSE context?
- Labour Union HSE initiatives?

3 What is the role of the HSE Department in maintaining an 4


overview external factors?
- What awareness of these issues is there at the various
management levels?
- senior management?
- departmental management?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 34
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.7 Documentation - HSE
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND MS Manual
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.7 Documentation - HSE MS Manual assessment level

1 Are there HSE procedures available in the company and the 1


organistional units within the company?

3.1.3.7 Documentation - HSE MS Manual assessment level

1 Is there a corporate HSE-MS Manual for management? (paper, 2


CDROM or controlled web site)
- Is the HSE MS for the project / department or unit descriubed in
a an HSE-MS Manual?
- Does it cover all 8 elements in detail?
- Are shortfalls in the HSE-MS identified and is an action plan for
rectification in place?

3.1.3.7 Documentation - HSE MS Manual assessment level

1 Is the HSE MS Manual substantially complete? 3


- Has the environmental part of the HSE-MS it describes been
certified to conform with ISO 14001?

2 Does the documentation adequately and separately cover the 3


standards for:
- Occupational health?
- Safety?
- Environment?

3 How does the company seek to influence developing or emerging 3


legislation?

3.1.3.7 Documentation - HSE MS Manual assessment level

1 Is the HSE-MS Manual complete, maintained up to date and 4


subjected to continuous improvement?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 35
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND Case
DOCUMENTS

3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE Case assessment level

1 Have all sites requiring HSE Cases been identified? 1


- Is the basis for their selection available?
- Is there a resourced plan in place for their development?

3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE Case assessment level

1 Are HSE Cases complete for all required locations and activities? 2
- Do these HSE Cases demonstrate how all relevant risks are
managed to *ALARP?
- Are HSE Cases endorsed by those managing the asset or
operation and senior management?

* risks with a consequence of 5A, 4B, 3C, 2D or higher on the risk


matrix (EP 95-0100).

2 Does the HSE Case document all the significant hazards and 2
potential risks of the activity /site / facility?

2 HSE Case Checklist: Is there a brief summary statement of the 2


objectives of preparing the Case, eg to meet legislation, to assure
that risks are reduced to ALARP, to demonstrate HSE risk
management, etc?

2 Is the Case specific to the facility / operation/ vessel? 2

2 Has ownership of the Case been defined? 2

2 Has responsibility for maintenance of the Case been defined? 2


- Is there a defined time period for revalidation?

2 Does the Case adequately describe the HSE-MS as implemented 2


for the facilitiy/ operation/ vessel?

2 In particular, is the "Evaluation and Risk Management Process" 2


adequately documented and in compliance with the Company HSE
MS?
- Does this process cover the elements of hazard identification,
threat and consequence identification, risk assessment and
necessary controls?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 36
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND Case
DOCUMENTS

2 Does the Case have an Activity Catalogue? 2


- Are activities "HSE critical" or only "Hazardous"?
- Have the responsible party for the Activities and Tasks been
clearly defined?
- Has this responsible party signed the activity sheet?

2 Does the Case have an adequate description of the Operation, 2


focusing on HSE considerations?

2 Does the Operations description make reference to all the systems 2


required by contractual or regulatory requirements to be inspected
by either regulator or third party certifying authority, e.g. cranes,
pressure vessels, and relief systems?

2 Does the Case have a Hazard and Effects Register? 2


- Have the risks associated with "Major" Hazards been
demonstrated to be ALARP?
- Are all Occupational H, S and E Hazards and Effects adequately
covered?
- Are Hazards and Effects systematically assessed i.e. on a risk
matrix after the implementation of controls?

2 Have control tasks defined on the Hazard Sheets been assigned to 2


individual positions?
- Via the Activity Catalogue?
- Via Job Descriptions?
- Via special listings given to staff?
- Via work procedures?

2 Is the wording of control tasks specific and self-explanatory? 2


- Are staff aware of these tasks?
- How does management verify execution of these tasks?

2 Does the Case reference HSE-critical Procedures? 2

2 Does the Case refer to the Workplace Hazard Management 2


system(s) in place: PTW, Tag-out/Lock-out procedures, JSA's,

2 Does the Case have a Manual of Permitted Operations (MOPO)? 2

2 Is there a HSE Case remedial action plan? 2


- Has the line taken ownership of this plan?
- Is the remedial action plan dated?
- Is there documented evidence of progress made versus this plan?

2 Is there a signed and dated Statement of Fitness for the Case? 2


- Is the date sufficiently recent (i.e. relevant to the current
operation)?
1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q
EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 37
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND Case
DOCUMENTS

2 Is there an "Interface Document" or "Bridging ocument" (Project 2


Plan or other) in place to describe the interface between the
Company and Contractor HSE-MS's?
- Does this include the Emergency response Plan?

2 Has all legislation applicable to the operations been identified and 2


summarised?
- Does the summary contain an overview of practical implications?

- Is this summary well disseminated/accessible (in Company and

2 Are HSE legislation and permits documented/registered 2


documents?
- Do these include local, national and international (where accords
are signed or promulgated) documents?

3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE Case assessment level

1 Do Contractors document how all hazards and effects are managed 3


on their contract?
- Can Contractors demonstrate that major risks are reduced to
*ALARP?
- Are the Interfaces between company and contractor systems
defined?

* risks with a consequence of 5A, 4B, 3C, 2D or higher on the risk


matrix (EP 95-0100)?

3 Are relevant staff made aware of the HSE Case? For example by: 3
- By participation in its development?
- Workshop at start of Project?
- Handout of relevant abstracts to all personnel?
- Handout of their tasks from the Case?

3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE Case assessment level

1 Is each HSE Case including those of contractors up to date? 4


- Are the interface documents up to date?
- Do these documents reflect current practice on the location or
activity?
- Are HSE Cases reviewed as per cycle specified in the Case?

2 Is there a defined Review Process of the Case, notably the Hazard 4


Register?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 38
3. ORGANISATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, 3.1.3.8 Documentation - HSE
RESOURCES, STANDARDS AND Case
DOCUMENTS

3 Are HSE cases reviewed in addition to the stated frequency? For 4


example:
- Before major modifications to the facility?
- After an unsatisfactory HSE Audit?
- Prior to start of new seismic and drilling projects?

3 How is Contractor awareness of changes in e.g. legal requirements 4


maintained?
- Contractor's own responsibility?
- Information provided by Company?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 39
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.1 Identification

3.1.4.1 Identification assessment level

1 Are the techniques for hazard & effects identification adopted by 1


the company documented?
- Are these techniques known by those employees responsible for
their use?

3.1.4.1 Identification assessment level

1 Are appropriate techniques such as Health Risk Assessment 2


(HRA), Environmental Assessment (EA) and HAZOP used on all
facilities and operations, new projects, acquisitions and
divestments?
Are the results documented in an inventory of hazards and effects?

2 Has the company systematically identified and documented the 2


HSE hazards and effects, which may affect or arise from its
operations? Does this cover:
- H,S and E
- Initial and routine plant start-up?
- Preventative, break-down and shut-down maintenance?
- Online and intrusive equipment inspection?

2 If not for done for all operations, has the specific activity audited 2
been subjected to HRA, EA, HIA, SIA, HAZID / HAZOP?
- Are these reviews stand alone or part of the HSE Case?

3.1.4.1 Identification assessment level

Is there a listing of "residual risks" of operations or failure of 3


control systems of operations that could have the following
potential results:
- Fire?
- Explosion?
- Spillage?
- Toxic emission?
- Death/injury?
- Civil unrest?

1 Is there a comprehensive inventory of HSE hazards and effects has 3


been documented for all units within the company.?

2 Is there a listing of identified HSE hazards and risks resulting from 3


operating the audited facility or executing the audited activity?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 40
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.1 Identification

3.1.4.1 Identification assessment level

1 Is there a process for updating the hazards and effects listing as a 4


result of changes to the operation or findings e.g. job hazard
analyses, inspections or incident analyses?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 41
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.2 Assessment

3.1.4.2 Assessment assessment level

1 Have hazard and effects assessments been carried out as part of 1


new projects, acquisitions, divestments and major modifications?

3 Do HSE assessments form an integral part of any proposal for 1


acquisition, divestment, abandonment or merger of business
entities?
- Are business risks, related to HSE, assessed in joint ventures that

3.1.4.2 Assessment assessment level

1 Have hazards and effects assessments been carried out for all 2
operations and assets, (includes workplace hazards).?
- Has the risk or significance of these been classified using the risk
matrix or equivalent and endorsed by management?

3 Have incidents and potential other HSE emergency situations 2


including those arising from the following been considered while
assessing the HSE risks:
- Product / material containment failures e.g.:
- fuel storage sites?
- flowline and pipeline transport?
- process equipment?
- fuel loading or transfer?
- Soil and/or ground water contamination?
- Waste storage or shipping of disposal failures?
- Emergency Shutdown System (ESD) failures?
- Lifting equipment failures?
- Helicopter crashes?
- Structural failure?
- Climatic, geophysical and other external natural events?
- Sabotage and breaches of security?
- Human factors including breakdown in the use of HSE-MS
procedures?

3.1.4.2 Assessment assessment level

1 Do the assessments include health, safety and the environment 3


including impact on third parties?
- Do the assessment for environmental effects satisfy ISO 14001
requirements?

2 Is there a requirement for an EA before approval of any new or 3


changed facility, process, or activity?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 42
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.2 Assessment

2 Does the Environmental Assessment (EA) process and document 3


include:
- Stakeholder consultation?
- Assess the need for a Social Impact Assessment (SIA)?
- Assess the need for a Health Impact Assessment (HIA)?
- Relevant environmental legislation?
- A well defined project scope?
- Discussion on alternative methods / designs and alternatives?
- Environmental information relevant to the project scope?
- The impacts of the project?
- The required mitigation measures of the impacts?
- An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) ?
- does the EMP address monitoring, audits and reinstatement?

2 Are there adequate procedures in place to evaluate (assess) HSE 3


risks resulting from identified hazards and effects against
consistent screening criteria?

2 Do the risk screening criteria differentiate between being: 3


- Tolerable?
- Intolerable i.e. additional controls and measures are to be
implemented?

2 Do the risk screening criteria take into account probabilities of 3


occurrence and severity of consequences for:
- People (staff and public) w.r.t. health and safety?
- Environment?
- Assets?
- Company reputation

3 Are EAs carried out routinely for all new projects? Do they cover 3
all life cycle stages:
- Seismic
- Drilling
- Engineering
- Development
- Construction
- Operation
- Abandonment

3 At what stages in the project is the EA process initiated? 3


- Is the EA completed and approved before start of operations
/construction?
- Who is involved in preparing and reviewing EAs?

3 What is the operational view of the value of EAs? 3

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 43
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.2 Assessment

3.1.4.2 Assessment assessment level

1 Are the hazard and effects assessments kept up to date and 4


modified when circumstances change as part of the change control
procedure?

3 Are the original assumptions made in the hazard and effect 4


identification process reviewed to determine if they still apply?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 44
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.3 Controls - and
ownership.

3.1.4.3 Controls - and ownership. assessment level

1 Have the controls and persons responsible for managing the 1


controls been identified for known risks?

2 Are there risks which have been identified as intolerable? 1


- Have adequate measures been defined and applied to reduce these
to tolerable levels?

3 Have risk reduction measures been defined for all HSE risks? 1
- Are these measures adequate? - do they suitably aim for risk
management at ALARP?

3.1.4.3 Controls - and ownership. assessment level

1 Can each 'significant' risk (including those in the workplace) be 2


demonstrably linked to a set of controls either preventative and/or
recovery?
- Is the quality of the controls commensurate with the risks?

3 How is waste management addressed in design e.g. 2


- Reduction at source as a prime objective in new design?
- Provision of treatment facilities e.g. aqueous effluents?
- Minimisation of gaseous emissions?

3 How does engineering: 2


- Ensures it knows of latest environmental technology?
- Incorporate alternative options and environmental cost / benefits?

3 During the design of the facility, service or pipeline, were the 2


following considered:-
- Location selection to minimise environmental impact?
- Occupational health and ergonomic impact?
- Separation of process equipment from personnel?
- On-line monitoring of emissions and effluents?
- Disposal facilities?
- Bulk versus packaged handling of raw chemicals?
- Minimisation of ignition sources?
- Structural integrity?
- Leak detection and shutdown?
- Soil protection and ground water monitoring?
- Emergency response and lifesaving requirements?

3 Are adequate controls, procedures or facilities available to manage 2


the risks?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 45
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.3 Controls - and
ownership.

3.1.4.3 Controls - and ownership. assessment level

1 Are all controls for known risks and hazards assigned to 3


responsible parties?
- Are performance measurements defined for the maintenance of
the controls?

2 Is there a regular monitoring program in place for hazards and 3


effect and their associated risks?

3 Within the context of environmental protection: 3


- How is energy conservation / efficiency addressed?
- How is the necessity to phase out Halons addressed?

3 Are adequate controls in place to manage the HSE risks within the 3
levels defined as tolerable?

3 Are residual HSE risks being effectively managed to ALARP? 3

3 Do supervisors and workers understand their responsibilities for 3


HSE Critical Activities?

3.1.4.3 Controls - and ownership. assessment level

1 Have controls been revised as a result of changes, improvements 4


and more demanding targets e.g. in terms of waste, discharges,
emissions, conservation and as appropriate, establishment of
community devlopment projects?

2 Is the operation / facility regularly being audited to verify that its 4


risk management procedures are being adhered to?
- How often and by whom?
- Are the results documented?

3 Are the residual hazard management requirements satisfied in 4


practice?

3 Is the effectiveness of risk management regularly monitored and 4


reviewed?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 46
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.4 Performance in
maintaining controls

3.1.4.4 Performance in maintaining controls assessment level

1 The means of measuring performance in the maintenance of critical 1


HSE controls are defined and documented?

3.1.4.4 Performance in maintaining controls assessment level

1 Are performance indicators available for all HSE-critical activities 2


(e.g. for testing systems, emergency response times, procedures,
training effectiveness)?
- Are these included or referenced in the HSE Case and assigned to
individuals?

3.1.4.4 Performance in maintaining controls assessment level

1 Is actual performance in undertaking HSE-critical activities 3


documented and trended against the performance activity
indicators set?

3.1.4.4 Performance in maintaining controls assessment level

1 Is performance against activity indicators used in staff appraisal 4


and rewarded accordingly?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 47
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.5 Recovery

3.1.4.5 Recovery assessment level

1 Are recovery procedures available in the company for general 1


emergency and contingency planning and for managing the
consequences of any failure to control hazards and effects?

3.1.4.5 Recovery assessment level

1 Are the procedures in Level 1 referenced in the HSE MS and or 2


HSE Case(s) together with those responsible for updating,
implementing and checking implementation of the procedures?

3.1.4.5 Recovery assessment level

1 Are all personnel familiar with their roles in control and recovery 3
procedures?
- Recovery procedures are regularly tested?
- Records are available to demonstrate that these procedures are in
place and performing satisfactorily under test?

3.1.4.5 Recovery assessment level

1 Are the control and recovery procedures updated and their 4


implementation improved as a result of drills and practical
experience from both inside and outside the company?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 48
4. HAZARD AND EFFECTS MANAGEMENT 3.1.4.6 Recording

3.1.4.6 Recording assessment level

1 Does the HSE-MS describe the procedures used in the analyses of 1


hazard and effects in the company.

3.1.4.6 Recording assessment level

1 Are all hazards and effects analyses described or referenced in the 2


HSE Case demonstrating that the selected option is ALARP?
- Are the controls in place to reduce risks to ALARP?
- Are all shortfalls identified in the remedial action plan?

2 Is there documented evidence of the consistent application of risk 2


reduction measures to reduce risk beyond the levels already
defined as tolerable e.g.:
- Additional procedures?
- Additional hardware?
- Additional manpower?

3.1.4.6 Recording assessment level

1 Do documents exists which describe all those activities which must 3


be discontinued or restricted in given circumstances (MOPO)?
- Are these documents based on HSE risk?
- Are they understood by all supervisors responsible for
operational decisions?

2 Does the Operations Manual clearly define process limits in terms 3


of:
- Pressures?
- Temperatures?
- Fluid characteristics?
- Flow rates?

2 Are activities which must be discontinued or restricted in certain 3


circumstances fully documented? (MOPO)

3 Have the limits of the original facilities design envelopes ( e.g.. 3


MOPO) been communicated to staff?

3.1.4.6 Recording assessment level

1 Is the HEMP documentation updated to reflect the actual 4


situation?
- Do all controls described in the analysis reflect existing practice
and any identified shortfalls?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 49
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.1 HSE Plan

3.1.5.1 HSE Plan assessment level

1 Is there a Corporate HSE Plan which includes one and five year 1
performance targets?

3.1.5.1 HSE Plan assessment level

1 Has an overall company HSE Plan been developed to meet 2


continuous improvement targets?
- Has a strategy been developed to close the gaps in the HSE
management system?

2 Do the corporate HSE plans clearly define the strategies, targets 2


and time tables required to meet the corporate HSE objectives and
targets, including those in the longer term?
- Do strategies address closing identified gaps in the HSE
management system?

2 Are the plans realistic and achievable? 2


- What % of targets were achieved in last reporting period

2 Have the corporate HSE plans and objectives been formulated 2


through input by appropriate levels of the organisation and/or
other input sources?

3 Does the HSE department provide guidance on preparing and 2


monitoring of departmental action plans?

3.1.5.1 HSE Plan assessment level

1 Have HSE improvement plans been developed in the different 3


units with resources, accountable parties and target dates.?
- Do these HSE plans align with the overall documented Corporate
HSE Plan and Business Plan?
- Does the Corporate HSE Plan reflect the resources required?

2 Are the HSE Plan tasks and targets SMART (simple, measurable, 3
achievable, realistic, time-based)?

3 Are subordinates held accountable for progress against plans and 3


targets?

3 Does the appropriate management level review departmental HSE 3


plans?
- For appropriateness of contents (eg. against corporate targets,
etc.)?
- For progress against plans and action items?
- How is this documented?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 50
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.1 HSE Plan

3.1.5.1 HSE Plan assessment level

1 Do strategies to improve company HSE performance in the longer 4


term form part of the overall business plan.
- Are targets are published externally annually?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 51
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.2 Asset Integrity

3.1.5.2 Asset Integrity assessment level

1 Are there operations ref. plans under development for some or all 1
assets?
- Are structured hazard review techniques performed for new
processes only?
- Is risk management focuses on mitigation?
- Are P & IDs and equip.t registers being developed or updated?

2 Are responsibilities for technical integrity of facilities or 1


equipment defined?
- Setting of standards?
- Technical validation of standards?
- Verification of compliance with standards?
- Authorisations of deviations (change control)?

2 Is asset custodianship clearly defined? 1

3.1.5.2 Asset Integrity assessment level

1 Are operations personnel are involved in hazard reviews in 2


accordance with company guidelines?
- Are P& ID and hazardous area drawings are held current?
Is the change management process adhered to?

3 Are responsibilities for technical integrity of facilities or 2


equipment known by staff?

3 Does the asset custodian have appropriate authority levels? 2

3 Have maintenance and inspections plans been agreed with the asset 2
custodian?

3.1.5.2 Asset Integrity assessment level

1 Are structured review hazard analyses complete for all processes? 3

- Have operations personnel participated in the development of


worst case incident scenarios for emergency planning purposes?

3 Is the asset custodian aware of equipment overdue for inspection? 3

3 Is there visible evidence that facility production/activity plans are 3


formulated around technical integrity and safety related activities?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 52
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.2 Asset Integrity

3 Is work pre-planned and job hazards consciously recognised? 3


- Does this include journeys planned and optional modes of
transport considered?

3 Are priorities maintained and resources balanced when additional 3


projects are introduced?

3.1.5.2 Asset Integrity assessment level

1 Have all recommendations arising from hazard analyses and 4


reviews have been resolved?
- Are employees involved in a process of ongoing review and
improvement of asset integrity?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 53
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.3 Procedures & work
instructions

3.1.5.3 Procedures & work instructions assessment level

1 Do HSE standards and procedures exist? 1


- Are they known to supervisors but are they inconsistently
applied and enforced?
- Are the HSE standard sand procedures documents written
primarily by HSE personnel or consultants with little or no
employee involvement?

2 Are there rules and procedures:? 1


- Do they identify possible hazards?
- Do they refer to governing legislation?
- Are they controlled documents?
- Understandable for target audience?
- Have users been involved in the preparation?
- Are they available at the right level?
- Have staff been adequately briefed on or trained in their use?

2 Are there specific procedures to cover simultaneous activities such 1


as:
- Production and drilling?
- Production and construction / commissioning?
- Production and maintenance?
- Seismic / hazardous areas?

3 For those areas of operation which are covered by HSE legislation. 1

3 For those areas of operation which are covered by HSE legislation: 1

3 Are written HSE procedures supplemented with worksite 1


instructional signs?
- Security, access control?
- Emergency Plans
- Hazardous area classification?
- Control of combustible material?
- PPE to be worn?

3.1.5.3 Procedures & work instructions assessment level

1 Are the HSE standards and procedures consistently applied? 2


- Do HSE or consultant personnel develop these with employee
input.?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 54
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.3 Procedures & work
instructions

2 Are there rules and procedures for HSE critical activities and 2
locations?
- Are they consistent with higher level documentation?
- Consistent and up-to-date with on-site conditions?
- Fit-for-purpose?

2 Is a permit to work (PTW) system in place? 2


- Who is the process custodian?
- Are there sufficient supervisory staff nominated to authorise a
permit?
- Are staff trained in the use of the PTW?
- Is a document available instructing in the use of the PTW?
- Are the PTWs examined before being authorised?
- Is the PTW process audited regularly?
- Is there any system of review of the use of the PTW system?

2 Is there a list of work for which a PTW is required? 2


- Are there general definitions as to which permits are necessary
when?

2 Do the following work permits exist? 2


- Hot work
- Electrical isolation
- Use of explosives
- Work at height above 2m
- Manriding (drilling rig manriding winches only)
- Entry to vessels
- Mechanical isolation
- Valve lock out
- Radiation permit
- Excavation
- Diving
- Heavy lifting

2 Are procedures in place in place to control operation and 2


maintenance of the following:
- PSV isolation valves?
- Vent/relief header valves?
- Locking systems?
- Castell/Sempell locks?
- CAR seals?
- ESD valve by-passes?
- Process drains?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 55
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.3 Procedures & work
instructions

2 Are procedures in place to control and maintenance for 2


instrumentation?
- Alarm and trip overrides?
- Fire & gas detection and logic systems?
- Trip setpoint changes?
- Control setpoint changes (including gain, etc.)?

2 Are there procedures for isolation and de-isolation of equipment 2


and vessels?
- Spade and valve listings for individual jobs?
- Purging air from systems prior to start-up?
- Purging hydrocarbons from system?
- Gas and oxygen testing?

2 Is the use of Breathing Apparatus equipment procedurised? 2


- Are all jobs listed which require the use of BA equipment?
- Is there a sufficient number of staff trained and authorised to use
BA equipment?
- Is regular maintenance of BA being covered?

2 Does the materials purchasing procedure make specific reference to 2


HSE related controls?
- HSE information (MSDS) is obtained from suppliers?
- HSE specifications are included in the purchase orders?

2 Does the materials purchasing procedures make specific reference: 2

- Composition and hazardous properties are required?


- Records be maintained of quantities of hazardous substances
purchased?

2 Does the materials storage procedures reference: 2


- bunded, impervious area storage for chemicals in sacks and/or
drums?
- Availability of materials data sheets locally at storage
sites/stores?

2 Does the materials storage procedures reference: 2


- Surplus stock management for hazardous materials?
- Secondary use or scrapping of used drums and containers?

2 Are there waste management procedures? 2


- Do the procedures include prevention, reduction, re-use,
recycling and recovery?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 56
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.3 Procedures & work
instructions

2 Do the waste management procedures adequately cover all 2


operations e.g.:
- Seismic?
- Drilling and workover?
- Production?
- Procurement and logistics?
- Engineering and construction?
- Accommodation /camps and catering?

2 Are the procedures related to accurate waste inventories? 2


- How is this information recorded?
- How often is the information updated?
- How are new waste streams identified and included?

2 Does the procedure specify requirements for waste segregation? 2

2 Is there a separate waste disposal procedure? 2


- Are the waste disposal facilities operated by the company or by
contractors?

2 Do the disposal facilities operating procedures specifically address 2


environmental aspects of .:
- Soil contamination?
- Burning of waste?
- Ground water pollution?

2 Are the procedures specific on allowable volumes, qualitative 2


limits and standards and what to do if a limit or standard is

2 Is there a robust and seamless system for executing Daily Orders? 2

- How are these handled at change of shifts?

3 Have the rules and procedures been distributed and communicated 2


to relevant employees and contractors?

3 Are the PTW requirements known to all the work force & 2
supervisors?
- Who physically checks that precautions have been taken before
work?
- Who personally briefs the men doing the job before work starts?

3 When in use, where are PTWs displayed? 2


- How is a permit adapted if scope of job changes in the middle?
- How does one establish when a job is finished?
- How long are permits stored?

3 How is a permit arranged in an emergency, such as during the 2

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 57
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.3 Procedures & work
instructions

3 Is equipment assessed pre procurement to ensure compliance with 2


company standards:
- Materials specification?
- Instrumentation standards used e.g. redundancy, standardisation?

- Coatings?

3 Do operators (Company and Contractor) know the procedures 2


relevant to their job?
- How did they get this knowledge?
- Have they read the procedures themselves?

3 Are the Design and Equipment HSE Standards and Specifications 2


complied with?

3 Are the general HSE rules and procedures complied with 2


- Vehicle standards
- Seat belt usage
- Wearing of PPE?
- Control of combustible materials?
- Chemicals handling?
- Office and worksite security?
- Alcohol and drugs?

3 Are facility and activity specific HSE instructions and procedures 2


complied with ?
- Permit to Work procedures?
- Work procedures?
- Night driving limitations?

3 Is there any evidence of non-compliance, if so at what level or 2


interface?
- How is non-compliance dealt with?
- Are the rules for compliance with procedures equally applied to
all staff?

3 What is the operating procedure for the particular job that they are 2
doing at this very moment?
- How did they find out what the procedure was?
- Are they following it exactly?
- How do they know this?

3 Do they know the checks to make before e.g.: 2


- Using lifting equipment?
- How do they get to know about a new procedure?
- Have they been involved in writing new procedures?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 58
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.3 Procedures & work
instructions

3.1.5.3 Procedures & work instructions assessment level

1 Is there a defined process for the development and review of HSE 3


standards and procedures?
- Does this process include employee involvement?
- Are Shell /OU DEP's consistently applied?
- Is there a documented process for updating Shell /OU DEP's?

2 Is there a documented process for the development and review of 3


HSE standards and procedures?

2 Is there a written procedure for handling refusal to work situations: 3

- How confident do the employees feel themselves with?


- Clarity of the procedure?

3 For those areas of operation which are covered by HSE legislation: 3

- Who is responsible for initiating changes to meet new legislation?

3 What do operators (Company and Contractor) think of their 3


procedures:
- Useful, accurate and practical?
- Are parts of the procedure unnecessary?
- Have they ever been asked to review, comment on existing or
new procedures?

3 Have there been occasions where the workforce had to deviate 3


from the procedures?
- How do they know when they are allowed to this?
- Are variances subject to a control procedure?

3 Who checks to make sure that the workforce is aware of the 3


procedures and understand them?
- How often does this happen?

3.1.5.3 Procedures & work instructions assessment level

1 Is there evidence that in addition to outside the formal review 4


cycle, modifications to standards and procedures have been
initiated by operations personnel?
- Have they ever been consulted for improvements of procedures?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 59
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.3 Procedures & work
instructions

3 Can operators and maintainers initiate change or modification to 4


procedures and work instructions?
- who is authorised to approve changes?
- is there prompt response to operator/maintainer requests for
change?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 60
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.4 Contingency planning
and External Planning

3.1.5.4 Contingency planning and External Planning assessment level

1 Are the relevant external emergency organisations unfamiliar with 1


the operational hazards in the company?
- Does the company emergency plan not define the incident
command structure and the relationship with these external
agencies?

2 Are there written plans and procedures for dealing with reported 1
emergencies, hazards or environmental effects?
- Crisis Management Plan?
- Emergency Response Plan (ERP?
- major fire and/or explosion?
- loss of containment and/or spillage?
- injury?
- death?
- civil unrest?
- Oil Spill Response Plan?

3.1.5.4 Contingency planning and External Planning assessment level

1 Is there a clear command structure for dealing with the various 2


types of emergencies?
- Are responsibilities of staff involved well defined?
- Is the incident command structure identified?
- Are regulatory emergency response requirements met?
- Is a comprehensive emergency response plan under development.

- Are external emergency agencies familiar with operational hazards


in the company?

2 Is there a Corporate Crisis Management Team? 2


- Is there an Emergency Response Adviser?
- is this person a member of the Corporate Crisis Management
Team?

2 Are the Contingency plans and procedures current and in 2


possession of those on the distribution list?

2 Do the contractors have their own emergency response plans and 2


procedures?
- Are these in accordance with contractual requirements?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 61
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.4 Contingency planning
and External Planning

3 Have key personnel participated in the development of worst case 2


incident scenarios?
- Are those involved in executing these plans familiar with the
plans/procedures?
- What is or has been the role of the HSE Department in
formulating these plans?

3 What are the experiences of Duty Personnel responding to 2


emergency calls?
- During normal office hours?
- Outside normal office hours?

3 Specifically for spill response, are contractors on call or 2


identified to provide assistance.

3 Do Medevac Plans comply with maximum responses times: 2


- Tier 1: 4 min - life saving first aid
- Tier 2: 20 min - fully trained & certified first aider
- Tier 3: 60 minutes - Paramedic, site doctor
- Tier 4: 4 hours specialist/hospital doctor

(These times should be tested during the audit if records do not


confirm them.)

3 When contractors rely on company resources to respond to own 2


emergencies:
- Is the contractor fully familiar with the possibilities and
limitations of the company emergency response resources?
- Has the contractor identified and managed the gaps?

3 Is the frequency of each type of exercise adequate? 2


- Has there been coverage by table top exercises, worksite
exercises (with full involvement of emergency response resources
and deployment of equipment)
- Real emergencies?

3.1.5.4 Contingency planning and External Planning assessment level

1 Is there a comprehensive tiered emergency response plan which is 3


integrated with individual site plans as appropriate?
- Are competencies defined in the plan and assured?
- Do drills include testing the co-ordination between sites?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 62
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.4 Contingency planning
and External Planning

2 Is guidance available on: 3


- Emergency plans?
- Training for firefighting teams, first-aiders, spill containment and
clean up, etc.?
- Emergency drills and exercises?
- Personal Protective Equipment?
- Addressing complaints and public concerns?

2 Is there a Duty System of trained Duty Personnel? 3


- Are there alternatives in case of unavailability?
- Have competencies been defined and assurance systems put in
place?

2 Is there a programme to co-ordinate with outside agencies? 3


- Fire departments/police?
- Local hospitals?
- Environmental departments?
- Contractors?

2 Is there a formal company or departmental schedule for ERP 3


excercises:
- Is the schedule being complied with?
- What percentage of planned exercises was actually carried out in
the last year?

2 Is there a formal feedback loop to improve the existing plans, 3


procedures, systems and hardware?

3 Are the emergency response team members familiar with their 3


duties and responsibilities?

3 How are updates to emergency response plans and procedures 3


documentation managed?
- Who is focal point for amendments?
- Who approves amendments?
- How are names and telephone numbers kept up to date?

3 Have all emergency response plans, procedures, systems, 3


hardware and organisations been tested with dry runs, work site
exercises or real emergency events?
- How are response to the exercises and real events reviewed?
- How often are emergency communications systems tested?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 63
5. PLANNING AND PROCEDURES 3.1.5.4 Contingency planning
and External Planning

3.1.5.4 Contingency planning and External Planning assessment level

1 Are drills conducted with third parties and agencies according to a 4


plan?
- Are improvements incorporated and checked?
- Are external agencies and communities familiar with site hazards
and emergency response plans?

3 Are third parties, agencies and contractors involved in the review 4


process of exercises and real events?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 64
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.1 Performance Monitoring

3.1.6.1 Performance Monitoring assessment level

1 Are the means of measuring performance in the maintenance of 1


critical HSE controls defined and documented?

1 Is the HSE management system is being introduced but 1


measurements which show that activities are being performed
satisfactorily are not yet available?

3.1.6.1 Performance Monitoring assessment level

1 Are performance measurements relating to 'results' (LTIs, 2


emissions etc.) collected?
- Have locations completed the first review assessment of the
implementation of their HSE-MS?

2 Are all SIEP internally and externally reported performance 2


measures of Company and Contractors being fully collected and
collated ?

3 How reliable and comprehensive are the performance measures? 2


- Are definitions and calculation methods consistent with
EP95-0325 guide?
- Are definitions known and understood by both the contributors
and collators?

3 Are all Company and Contractor vehicle accidents recorded (also 2


those with minor damage)?
- Are all Company and Contractor Sub-Contractors vehicle vehicle
kilometres driven while engaged on Company business recorded?

3.1.6.1 Performance Monitoring assessment level

1 Are locations beginning to develop performance indicators to 3


measure the elements and procedures of the HSE MS?

2 Is there routine monitoring of emissions and / or effluents? 3

2 Are measures in place within the Company for all elements of 3


HSE-MS development?
- HSE-MS development progress against plan
- Completion of HSE-MS remedial actions against plan
- HSE-Case development progress against plan

2 Are all SIEP internally and externally reported performance 3


measures of Company and Contractors systematically recorded,
assured and verified within the Company?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 65
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.1 Performance Monitoring

2 Are (sub-)contractors required to maintain and report HSE 3


performance?
- Are contractor HSE statistics included in the overall company
statistics?
- Is there a guideline defining contractors excluded from HSE
statistics?

2 Are there inspections/checks for: 3


- Electrical equipment e.g. condition of fixtures, wiring, grounds
and connections?
- Mechanical equipment e.g. condition of power transmission,
machine guarding?
- Walking and working surfaces e.g. condition of guarding,
cleanliness?
- Compressed gas cylinders e.g. segregation, protection and
restraints?
- Flammable materials e.g. storage, ventilation and working
supply?
- Exits and escape routes e.g. marking, visibility, lighting and
unobstructed access?
- Deluge showers and eye baths e.g. water flow, temperature and
drainage?
- Personal Protective Equipment?
- Scrap, and waste e.g. accumulation, removal, storage and
disposal?
- Aisles and storage stacks e.g. accessibility, marking, dimensions?

- Chemicals e.g. location, segregation, stability, damage,


protection?
- Tag-out and lock-out e.g. adequacy, and use of tags and lock-out
devices?
- Points of discharge e.g. measurement devices, control to specified
3 Are individual Company locations, asset areas and Contractor sites 3
using a consistent sub set of the Company HSE-MS performance
measures?

3 How often does the contract holder review the contractors HSE 3
performance?

3 How and how often are comparisons made with HSE performance 3
of other sections, companies, sectors?
- Inside same country?
- Outside same country but within Group?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 66
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.1 Performance Monitoring

3 Do supervisors carry out regular inspections? 3


- How often?
- What do they look for?
- Are check lists used
- Is there any guidance on the subject?
- What reports are generated and who gets them?

3.1.6.1 Performance Monitoring assessment level

1 Are numerical performance indicators and targets used to measure 4


the implementation of the elements and procedures of the HSE
MS?
- Are numerical performance indicators and targets included in
employee appraisal?

3 Do line supervisors actively support and participate in Unsafe Act 4


Auditing with focus on people first and equipment second?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 67
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.2 Records

3.1.6.2 Records assessment level

1 Is the monitoring system for health, environmental and safety 1


performance driven mainly by legislation?
- Are health programs developing?

2 Are all reportable Company, Contractor and Sub-contractor 1


injuries recorded?

3.1.6.2 Records assessment level

1 Have tasks been identified where exposure assessments should be 2


made?
- Have significant effects been identified where environmental
measurements should be taken?

2 Is contractor's HSE performance recorded and used within the 2


Companys
- Contractor registration system?
- Who does this analysis and how often is this done?

2 Is there a list of outstanding HSE action items and their status? 2


- Who keeps track
- Are closed out items reported on, or do they just disappear?
- How and how often is management informed of the action status?

3 When was the last visit by the off-site supervisor / manager?: 2


- Supervisor at base?
- Department head?
- Are the results discussed with operators?

3 With the latest supervisory inspection report at hand, visit the 2


inspected site/operation with the particular supervisor and review:

- The gaps in the checks,

3.1.6.2 Records assessment level

1 Are records for most health, environmental and safety 3


measurements available in the company?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 68
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.2 Records

2 Are the following Health indcators being measured and reported: 3


- Smoking rate?
- Noise exposure frequency?
- Exposure toxic chemicals
- Sickness absenteeism?
- Occupational Illness Performance Indicators?
- Total Recordable (Occupational) Illness Frequency?
- Lost-Time (Occupational) Illness Frequency?

2 Are the following HSE-MS indcators being measured and reported: 3

- Progress against plans and/or targets?


- Effectiveness of HSE initiatives
- Number of training courses?
- Achieving HSE milestones ?
- Number of audits?

2 Are the following Safety indcators being measured and reported: 3


- Unsafe Act Audits and results?
- Lost Time Injury Frequency?
- Total Recordable Case Frequency?
- Ratio of TRCF to LTIF?
- Vehicle accidents?
- Number of km driven?
- Near misses?
- Number of "first-aid and other minor injuries"?
- Material Losses?
- Compliance with HSE legislation?

2 Are the following Environment indcators being measured and 3


reported:
- Spillages and product cross-overs?

3 Is Near Miss and Unsafe Acts analysis effectively used for 3


improvement?
- Properly analysed?
- Conclusions drawn and actioned?

3.1.6.2 Records assessment level

1 Are records for health*, environmental and safety measurements 4


available on locations?
- Are trends openly discussed as part of improvement plans.?

* confidentiality requirements permitting.

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 69
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.3 Non compliance &
corrective Action

3.1.6.3 Non compliance & corrective Action assessment level

1 Are the procedures which describe what must be done in the event 1
of non compliance with legislation, procedures and standards
known?

2 Is there a formal guideline for: 1


- Handling violators of HSE rules?
- Commendation of those who demonstrate consistent compliance?

3.1.6.3 Non compliance & corrective Action assessment level

1 Few variances are recorded and the procedure for approving 2


variance is ill defined or impractical.

3 Do supervisors and line managers feel empowered to take 2


disciplinary action for repeat offenders?
- do they exercise these powers?

3 Is there any evidence of formal action taken against repeat 2


offenders of compliance requirements?

3.1.6.3 Non compliance & corrective Action assessment level

1 Is there a documented system for variance control of HSE critical 3


procedures and standards?
- Is the system known by those responsible for following
procedures and standards?
- Are there records for variances at all locations and projects?

2 Are HSE non-compliance by Contractors reflected both in contract 3


close-out reports and in the Companys Contractor registration
system?

3 Do line supervisors verify and reward compliance with 3


procedures, PTW, PPE requirements, etc.?

3 Does line supervision take appropriate action against 3


non-compliance?

3 Are all staff (Company and (sub-) Contractors) familiar with 3


applicable legislation and the practical consequences?
- Are they familiar with the penalties for non-compliance?

3 Have there been any cases of disciplinary action against repeat 3


offenders of compliance requirements?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 70
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.3 Non compliance &
corrective Action

3.1.6.3 Non compliance & corrective Action assessment level

1 Do employees anticipate any potential need to deviate from 4


standards and procedures?
- Do they allow sufficient time to consider alternatives?
- Do they if necessary obtain the appropriate authorisations for
the variance?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 71
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting &
follow up.

3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting & follow up. assessment level

1 Are significant high profile incidents investigated? 1


- Are these investigations undertaken directly by HSE personnel?

- Are the investigation findings only disseminated locally?


- Is the remedial action poorly tracked?

2 Are fatalities reported to the Service Companies within 24 hours? 1

- Are high potential incidents details distributed appropriately


within 24 hours?

3 Is there any evidence that there is a blame culture? 1


- Throughout the organisation?
- At selected locations/parts of the organisation only?

3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting & follow up. assessment level

1 Are there procedures for reporting and investigating incidents? 2


- Do both HSE personnel and supervisors undertake
investigations?
- Is there a documented process for tracking recommendations?

2 Is there an adequate HSE incident reporting and investigation 2


procedure?
- Does it define what constitutes a reportable HSE
accident/incident?
- Uses standard reporting forms/reports?

2 Are there clear guidelines for appointing the incident/accident 2


investigation team leader and team members?
- Do the cover the competency and training requirements of team
members?
- Do these guidelines separately cover:
- fatality?
- lost time injury?
- vehicle accident?
- fire, explosion or other material damage?
- potential for any of the above outcomes?
- when is at-the-scene participation of senior management
required?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 72
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting &
follow up.

2 Are all incidents/accidents to be reported: 2


- First-aid injuries?
- Occupational illness?
- Property damage?
- Chemical and oil spills?
- Fires and/or explosions?
- Third party?
- Near misses?

2 How are repetitive or significant items of damage or loss identified 2


by the system?
- Do maintenance records identify accidental damages?
- How often are property damage rates communicated to
management?

2 What verification system do line supervisors have in place to 2


ensure that they are told of all incidents/accidents?
- Checks of first-aid register for injuries not formally reported?
- Is there any evidence that incidents/accidents are not reported?

3 Are incident reports/investigations seen to assist accident 2


prevention?

3 Are all incidents and accidents being reported? 2

3 Are contractor staff involved? 2


- Because the incident/accident occurred in their own sphere?
- Because they possess relevant experience to assist in other
investigations?

3 Is the HSE department routinely involved in either participating or 2


supporting incident investigation by the Line?

3 Who decides to initiate a formal incident/accident 2


investigation/report?
- Who decides how injuries are classified - as MTC, RWC or LTI?

- line management?
- Senior Management?

3 Does the Line and/or Site Supervisor always see the investigation 2
report before it is published?
- Does he/she always agree with it?
- How are his/her doubts communicated:
- to the Line Department?
- to the HSE Department?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 73
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting &
follow up.

3 Are the incident/accident investigation guidelines complied with? 2


- Incidents that need to be reported to national authorities, etc.?
- Are deadlines for reporting given and adhered to?

3 How are sub-contractor accidents reported? 2


- How and by whom are they investigated?
- who leads the team?
- are sub-contractor staff involved?
- Does the sub-contractor Supervisor always see the report before
it is published?

3 Is there evidence of constructive follow-up by the 2

3 What features of reported incidents are analysed: 2


- Frequency?
- Probability of recurrence?
- Potential loss?
- Causes.

3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting & follow up. assessment level

1 Is the reporting and investigation process well understood? 3


- Is the reporting and investigation process also applied to high
potential near misses?
- Are supervisors trained in incident investigation?
- Do supervisors direct investigations which include employee
participation?
- Are lessons learned disseminated?

2 Are there clear guidelines that incident investigations must include 3


review of relevant parts of the HSE Case, and that conclusions and
actions must be fed back into the HSE Case?

2 Do the gudelines cover the Immediate reporting to management of 3


accidents/incidents which:
- Are politically sensitive e.g. third parties involvement?
- Require immediate, company wide dissemination for lateral
learning?

2 Is the reporting and investigation also applied to high potential 3


near misses?

2 Are Accident Trees (e.g. TRIPOD) used during incident/accident 3


investigations?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 74
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting &
follow up.

2 Is there a structured system involving different tiers in both the 3


Company and Contractor that analyse occupational
injuries/illnesses?
- Frequency and severity of injuries/illnesses?

2 Do incident analyses identify immediate and causes in relation to: 3

- HSE-MS (training, supervision, etc.)?


- Environmental factors?
- Defective equipment, or facilities?
- Inadequate work procedures?

3 Are line supervisors proactive in analysing HSE 3


accidents/incidents and disseminating lessons learned to staff?
- By note and/or personal briefing?

3 Are the procedures of incident reporting and investigations 3


distributed to all relevant levels?
- All company supervisory staff?
- All contractors and sub-contracting supervisory staff?

3 Is the reporting and investigation process well understood? 3


- Have the Supervisors been trained in incident investigation?

3 When does management discuss HSE accidents/incidents? 3


- Are these discussions minuted?

3 How often are incidents and incident rates discussed? 3


- What kind of information do they get?
- relating to their own part of the organisation?
- relating to other parts of the organisation?

3.1.6.4 Incident Reporting & follow up. assessment level

1 Are investigation findings documented and addressed in a timely 4


manner?
- Are accountabilities assigned and tracked to closure?
- Is all information stored and retrievable?
- Do employees suggest improvements to the process?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 75
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.5 Change Control

3.1.6.5 Change Control assessment level

1 Are the changes to approved plans (cost time, resources) approved 1


"one level up", and only formally documented and approved when
required by financial controls?

3.1.6.5 Change Control assessment level

1 Is there a change control procedure? 2

2 Is there a system for management of controlled HSE 2


documentation in the company?

2 Are there procedures for execution of change modification work? 2


- Who supervises change modification work?
- What is the procedure for the work request?

3.1.6.5 Change Control assessment level

1 Are there several change control procedures (corporate, BU/asset, 3


projects)?
- Is the scope of each change control procedure clearly defined?
- Do the procedures document evaluation, approval and the
responsibilities and competencies of those involved?

2 Are custodians for each HSE document appointed? 3

2 Do documents require formal approval by specialist staff and 3


management prior to:
- Initial issue?
- Issue of revision?

2 Are fixed review periods defined for every document? 3


- How frequent are these reviews?
- Are the prescribed review periods being complied with?

2 Are Line Managers appointed as "Owner/holder" for every 3


document?

2 Are authorised change control procedures available on site, are 3


they comprehensive enough and are they (including any waiver
procedures) being applied?

2 Do the change control procedures adequately cover: 3


- Changes in design or material?
- Changes in working techniques?
- Changes in consumables (e.g. welding rods)?
- Waivers of specifications?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 76
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.5 Change Control

2 How are changes implemented? 3


- Are there meetings?
- are minutes available?

2 Are there documented procedures for managing change of staff and 3


organisation?

2 Are there adequate, documented procedures for managing change 3


for:
- Company and work procedures?
- Legislation?
- how are changes in legislation identified?

2 Is it formally documented who can authorise deviations from a 3


rule, standards and procedures?
- Is this documented separately for:
- engineering standards?
- general HSE rules?
- activity and site specific HSE instructions and procedures?

2 Do the change procedures specify: 3


- Authority levels for approval of changes and modifications?
- Communication required to inform the relevant organisations and
staff?
- Documentation procedures to be adhered to?

2 Are changes to the hardware, operating procedures or legislation 3


incorporated in the HSE-MS?

2 Do the change procedures specify: 3


- Authority levels for approval of changes and modifications?
- Communication required to inform relevant organisations and
staff?
- Documentation procedures to be adhered to?

2 Is the variance procedure to allow deviations from standards 3


available onsite?
- Does it require involvement of sufficiently senior management?
- How is the input of each specialist discipline ensured?
- What is the involvement of the HSE department?

3 Has Line management taken full ownership of their particular HSE 3


related documents?

3 Are current HSE related documents available at all key locations? 3


- Can staff easily access documents?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 77
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 3.1.6.5 Change Control

3 Prior to allowing staff to take full responsibilities of activities 3


within their sphere of influence:
- Is their HSE competence assessed for successfully handling their
new job?
- is a remedial training plan formulated where deficiencies are
observed?

3 At what organisational level can these deviations be authorised? 3


- how are the deviations and authorisation thereof recorded?
- are these records ever audited?

3 Are the supervisors fully familiar with the company variance 3


procedure?
- Are the procedures followed?

3.1.6.5 Change Control assessment level

1 Do the change control procedures include the requirement for 4


comparative analysis and documentation of the HSE impact of
IMPLEMENTING the change as well as the HSE impact of the
IMPLEMENTED change.
- Are there records of this being done?

2 Is there a system in place for monitoring compliance with 4


documents?

3 Were change proposals appropriately vetted during the review 4


process and the HSE cases and procedures subsequently updated?

3 Have all completed changes been included as appropriate in the 4


HSE Case and/or procedures?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 78
7. AUDIT 3.1.7.1 Audit plan

3.1.7.1 Audit plan assessment level

1 Are Audits mainly focused on hardware and housekeeping? 1


- Are the audits conducted mostly by HSE personnel?
- Are regulatory audits conducted?

3.1.7.1 Audit plan assessment level

1 Is the auditing plan and process documented? 2


- Is checklist and compliance auditing being performed?
- Is there a follow up system in place?
- Are supervisors involved in auditing?

2 What is a typical age of outstanding action items? 2

3 How are follow-up system (database) issues handled by the 2


on-site system?

3.1.7.1 Audit plan assessment level

1 Is the audit process defined and implemented? 3


- Are supervisors take ownership of audit process?
- Does the audit process involve employees and independent
parties?
- Are audit recommendations documented and tracked to closure?

2 Is there a documented HSE audit process, consistent with 3


EP95-0130, to verify effectiveness of the HSE Management

2 Does the HSE audit process specify standards in terms of: 3


- Responsibilities?
- Team composition?
- Location?
- Frequency?
- Method?
- Follow-up?

2 Is there an integrated corporate audit plan, which covers HSE 3


audits for the full range of company facilities and activities?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 79
7. AUDIT 3.1.7.1 Audit plan

2 Do the audit plans cover: 3


- HSE management audits?
- HSE departmental audits?
- Cross-departmental HSE audits?
- Contractor HSE audits?
- Occupational health audits?
- Waste management audits?
- Restoration and recovery audits

2 What are the typical audit frequencies for: 3


- Integrated HSE audits?
- Separate H, S and E audits?
- Are the HSE audits carried out at the planned frequency?
- if not, what is the actual frequency?

2 Are Contractors required to have a corporate audit system 3


implemented irrespective of contractual requirements?
- Regular/major contractors?
- All contractors?

2 Is there an Internal Audit Committee or Department? 3


- Do they regularly review and approve the audit plan?
- Are there minutes kept of IAC meetings?

2 Are asset integrity issues with an HSE impact adequately covered? 3

2 Are there corporate environmental audits? 3


By qualified persons?

2 Are standard audit questionnaires provided for use by auditors? 3

2 Is there a structured, time based programme for departmental 3


audits, covering company as well as contractor facilities and

2 Do departmental HSE plans reflect corporate plans regarding 3


auditing e.g.:
- Number and types of audits to be conducted?
- Audit schedules?
- Are the HSE audits carried out at the planned frequency?

2 Are pre-start operational audits systematically carried out? 3


- Fully covering H, S and E?
- Do they adequately cover all areas of the operation?

2 Is there a single Company follow-up system (database) for all 3


audit types?

3 Do managers and supervisors take ownership of audit process 3


which involves employees and independent parties?
1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q
EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 80
7. AUDIT 3.1.7.1 Audit plan

3 Do Health apects of audits cover: 3


- chemical agents, including caustic, corrosive and toxic; labels,
storage, disposal, clean up?
- engineering and procedural controls, including ventilation of toxic
fumes, vapours, mists, smoke, gases and dust?
- Noise exposure; measurement and controls?
- Temperature extremes; measurement and controls?
- Hazardous substances; ?
- Biological agents, surveys and controls?
- Health surveillance?
- Illumination; surveys and controls?
- PPE; selection, placement and compliance?
- Ergonomics; surveys and controls?
- Living environment and life-style health hazards?

3 Do environmental aspects of audits cover: 3


- External environmental protection; evaluations and actions?
- Chemical storage and containment?
- Waste treatment, storage and inventories?
- Waste reporting to authorities?
- Environmental effects monitoring?
- Purchasing (toxicity) controls?
- Site rehabilitation success?

3 What internal and external HSE audits have been done in the past? 3

- Was the frequency fixed? By whom?


- Who took part?
- wide cross-section of the work force?
- staff from outside the location/section?

3 How is the effectiveness of HSE auditing verified? 3

3 Can audit follow-up be seen to be effective? 3

3 Is responsibility for follow-up firmly established in the line? 3


- What is the role of the HSE department in the follow-up?

3.1.7.1 Audit plan assessment level

1 Is the audit programme fully implemented? 4


- Does the skilled auditor base include HSE personnel, supervisors
and employees?
- Is conformance with ISO 14001 externally certified?
- Have past audit recommendations arising from serious findings
been resolved?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 81
7. AUDIT 3.1.7.1 Audit plan

2 Is there a system of Unsafe Act Auditing in place? 4


- What training/instruction have people received in UAA?
- Do staff understand the difference with UA reporting?
- Does the system adequately cover all areas of the operation?

2 Is there an effective system for lateral application of audit 4


recommendations?

3 Is the defined audit process fully implemented? 4

3 Is the audit structure, plan and execution audited at appropriate 4


times by independent auditing?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 82
7. AUDIT 3.1.7.2 Competency

3.1.7.2 Competency assessment level

1 Does the Company uses mainly unqualified and/or inexperienced 1


resources for HSE audits?

3.1.7.2 Competency assessment level

1 Do HSE personnel involved in audits first undergo formal HSE 2


audit training?
- Is there is a process of describing the required competency for
auditors?

3 How are HSE auditors trained? 2


- Technical competence?
- HSE competence?
- Auditing skills?

3 Does Company have access to and only use qualified, experienced 2


personnel for HSE audits?

3.1.7.2 Competency assessment level

1 Do personnel in other parts of the organisation as well as the HSE 3


or audit department undergo HSE audit training and competency
development?

3.1.7.2 Competency assessment level

1 Has company access to, and only uses, qualified, experienced 4


personnel with high credibility to perform HSE audits?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 83
7. AUDIT 3.1.7.3 Contractor

3.1.7.3 Contractor assessment level

1 Do regular contractors have formal internal HSE audits on their 1


operations?

3.1.7.3 Contractor assessment level

1 Do regular contractors provide senior personnel to participate in 2


company led integrated HSE audits of the operations contracted to
them?

3 How are follow-up system (database) issues handled in the 2


Contractor's Corporate system?

3.1.7.3 Contractor assessment level

1 Do regular Contractors have an HSE audit process and audit 3


schedule?
- Is it implemented irrespective of contractual requirements?
- Does the audit schedule include audits carried out by independent
auditors?

2 Are Contractor internal audit reports made available to Company? 3

2 Does the contractor operation have a system of Cross-audits in 3


place?
- Are these audits properly documented?
- Are checklists available for such auditing?

3 Are subcontractors audited by the main contractor? 3


- Who verifies the follow-up of the action items?
- Are reports available?

3 How often is contractor's work audited for unsafe acts and 3


conditions?
By whom?

3 Does senior (corporate or country management) management carry 3


out audits?
- Are checklists used?
- Are these audits documented?

3.1.7.3 Contractor assessment level

1 Do all Contractors have a formal system of corporate audits? 4


- Is it implemented irrespective of contractual requirements?
- Are independent audits included?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 84
8. MANAGEMENT REVIEW 3.1.8.1 General

3.1.8.1 General assessment level

1 Are modifications to the HSE management system only instigated 1


and followed up by senior management when shortcomings have
been highlighted as a result of incidents or failure to meet targets or
regulatory requirements?

3 Does management review incident investigations? 1


- Is this formalised?
- Do management analyse incidents for underlying causes?
- Are recommendations to prevent recurrence endorsed by
management?

3.1.8.1 General assessment level

1 Have the management reviews of the HSE Management System(s) 2


that have taken place been done in an adhoc manner and are not
well documented?

3.1.8.1 General assessment level

1 Is there a defined process for formal and regular review of the HSE 3
management system?

2 Is there a regular and formal review of the effectiveness of the 3


company HSE-MS?
- Is the review interval at least annual?
- Who is the focal point for the review?
- Are all the management team involved in the review process?
- Are reviews documented?

2 Are recommendations from audits, inspections and reviews 3


incorporated in the overall HSE-MS review?
- Is effective action taken on outstanding issues from audits and
inspections?
- Can this be verified from the documentation?

2 Does the Contractor have a corporate or regional review system? 3


- Reviewing the HSE-MS?
- Reviewing progress against (major) audits?
- Reviewing progress against objectives and targets?

3 Are Contractor HSE-MS reviews documented and disseminated to 3


Country Management or Site Management?
- Are site personnel informed of relevant issues (performance
against targets, etc.)?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 85
8. MANAGEMENT REVIEW 3.1.8.1 General

3 Do the Department and Line managers regularly review: 3


- Minutes of subordinates' HSE meetings, incident investigation
reports, audit
reports?
- is progress on follow up monitored and stimulated?
- what are steps taken to ensure lateral learning?

3 Does management regularly review consequences of legal 3


developments and other external developments?

3.1.8.1 General assessment level

1 Have Senior management reviewed the effectiveness of the HSE 4


MS following a defined process and implemented the conclusions?

- Did the review take into account changes in risk exposure,


stakeholders, the business environment and performance?

2 Has there been a focal point appointed for follow-up of the 4


Management review of the HSE-MS?
- Has a plan been put in place for follow-up of review action
items?
- Has there been progress made in the follow-up process?

3 Are changes in risk exposure, stakeholder perception, business 4


environment or performance taken into account in the review?

1 top level q, 2 system / documentation , 3 verification / interview or physical check q


EP HSE 13-May-02 Page 86

Você também pode gostar