Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
for
Health Professionals
1
Module 2
Epidemiology
The Basic Science
of Public Health
Epidemiology
The Basic Science of Public Health
2
OBJECTIVES
define epidemiology and explain its role as the foundation for public health
describe three common measures of disease frequency
discuss the strengths and weaknesses of three major epidemiologic study
designs
identify at least two applications of the epidemiologic method
3
Part I
4
Epidemiology
5
From Hippocrates
to John Graunt
z Fifth century BCE, Hippocrates pointed
to the need to understand the
environment and the risks it posed to
understand the experience of disease
z 1662, John Graunt analyzed weekly
reports of births and deaths in London,
quantifying patterns of disease in the
population
6
From William Farr
to John Snow
z 200 years later, Dr. William Farr was
made responsible for medical statistics
in the Office of the Registrar General for
England and Wales
z A mere 20 years later, John Snow
completed his study of cholera
Farrs contribution is the tradition of using vital statistical data to study health
problems. His studies compared married to single persons, workers in
different occupations (metal mines and earthenware industry), elevations
above sea level, and the effects of incarceration.
If your class did not complete Module 1a, you might want to include at this
point the slides from that module on John Snow and cholera in London,
which provide a dramatic illustration of epidemiologic analysis.
7
Modern Experiences
8
Three Essential Components
z Disease distribution
z Disease determinants
z Disease frequency
Expected level
Endemic
Sporadic
Epidemic
Pandemic
9
Epidemiologic Studies
z Descriptive
z Analytic
10
Descriptive Studies
11
Analytic Studies
z Observational studies
case-control studies
cohort studies
prospective
retrospective
z Experimental studies
Cohort studies: groups of individuals with some common feature (age and
geography, for example) are identified for study over time to learn about
differing health and illness experiences. For example, one might enroll in a
study all third graders in a school and follow them until graduation,
attempting to identify the differences in experiences of those who maintained
a body weight close to recommended and those who did not.
The next slides illustrate some of the differences in timing in these types of
studies: case control, prospective cohort, and retrospective cohort.
12
Case Control Study
Exposure Disease
?
Key
Basis for selection of group for study
= present = absent
KEY
? To be determined
At the beginning of the case control study, the investigator knows that there
are some people with a disease; they are matched with similar individuals
(controls) who do not have the disease. The investigator looks backward to
identify what different exposures the two groups might have had. For
example, when some individuals attending a picnic become ill, they could be
matched with controls who also attended the picnic but did not become ill,
and all interviewed about what was eaten, to identify a possible source of
food-borne illness.
13
Prospective Cohort Study
Exposure Disease
?
Key
= present = absent
KEY
? To be determined
14
Retrospective Cohort Study
Exposure Disease
?
Key
= present = absent
KEY
? To be determined
15
Analytic Studies
z Observational studies
z Experimental studies
Intervention studies
Clinical trials
16
Basic Presentation of Results
Disease Disease
TOTAL
Yes No
Exposed
Yes A B A+B
Exposed
C D C+D
No
TOTAL A+C B+D A+B+C+D
All rates and ratios discussed can be
calculated from this.
Chi-square is the basic statistic used to test for the significance of any differences
noted in distribution of disease or risk in a table such as this.
A= the number of individuals who are exposed and have the disease
B= the number of individuals who are exposed and do not have the disease
C= the number of individuals who are not exposed and have the disease
D= the number of individuals who are both non-exposed and non-diseased
Any rates needed for epidemiologic analysis can be calculated from this basic
table. Unless your students are extremely familiar with statistics, you should insert
an example that will be of interest, and take some time to discuss it.
17
Smoking
and Carcinoma of the Lung
Disease status # of smokers # of nonsmokers P-value
Males
Lung cancer 647 (99.7%) 2 (0.3%)
Controls 622 (95.8%) 27 (4.2%) 0.00000064
Females
Lung cancer 41 (68.3%) 19 (31.7%)
Controls 28 (46.7%) 32 (53.3%) 0.016
Doll R, Hill AB 1950 Smoking and carcinoma of the lung: preliminary report. British Medical
Journal 2:739.
This table shows the association between smoking and lung cancer, taken
from the historic study by Doll and Hill.
Men and women with and without lung cancer were categorized as smokers
or non-smokers. Thus, the exposure was smoking; the disease outcome of
interest was lung cancer.
18
Interpreting Results:
Measurement Errors
z Bias
information
selection
z Confounding
extraneous factors
z Effect modification
statistical interaction
Confounding can occur when a variable related to the condition under study is
associated with, but not a consequence of, the exposure under investigation.
While it is never possible to control all factors in an epidemiologic study, findings
will be easier to interpret if extraneous factors are eliminated or made identical
for cases and controls.
Effect modification occurs when the magnitude of the association between one
variable and another differs according to the level of a third variable. Detecting
effect modification is an important aspect of data analysis.
19
Interpreting Results: Cause-
Effect Relationship
z Strength of the association
z Consistency
z Temporality
z Plausibility
z Biological gradient
In general, there are five criteria that must be met to establish a cause and
effect relationship. These are:
20
Measures of Disease
Frequency
z Prevalence
z Incidence
Prevalence and incidence are commonly confused. They are similar, but
differ in the number of cases included in the numerator:
Incidence includes only the number of new cases during a given time period.
21
Prevalence
The numerator for prevalence includes all persons during a specified interval
or point in time, regardless of when the condition began.
For example, a visual examination survey of 2477 persons between the ages
of 52 and 85 years showed that 310 had cataracts. The prevalence of the
condition was
22
Types of Prevalence Measures
R a te N u m erato r D en o m in ato r
Disease rate at Number of cases of disease Number of persons
autopsy autopsied
Birth defect rate Number of babies with a given Number of live births
abnormality
This chart shows several types of prevalence rates. All have in common a
numerator that includes all cases (new and old) of the condition under study.
23
Incidence
The numerator for incidence includes only those persons who develop the
condition during the specified time period.
24
Types of Incidence Measures
This chart shows several types of incidence rates. All have in common a
numerator that includes only new cases of the condition under study.
Note: When the denominator is the size of the population at the start of the
time period, the measure is sometimes called cumulative incidence. It is a
measure of the probability or risk of the disease or condition, i.e., what
proportion of the population will develop an illness or condition during the
specified time period. In contrast, the incidence rate indicates how quickly
people become ill measured in people per year.
25
Rates Commonly Used in
Epidemiology
z Crude
z Category specific
z Age adjusted
Crude rates are those calculated for an entire population, such as the
annual cancer mortality rate.
Rates imply a change over time. For disease incidence rates, the change is
from a healthy state to disease for a specified period of time.
26
Module Author
Dr. Wheeler is the Director of the Office of Public Health Practice at the School of Public
Health, University of South Carolina. Prior to joining the faculty at USC, she worked for
over twenty years in chronic disease prevention and health promotion programs at the
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. As a long-time
consultant with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, she also has experience
in public health policy development at the national level. Dr. Wheeler has published
research on the epidemiology of chronic diseases and related risk factors, as well as
community-based public health interventions to address those problems in South
Carolina. Her professional interests include policy and environmental interventions for
chronic disease prevention and health promotion, translating research into public health
practice, and minority health.
27